sports betting and the indian gaming regulatory act€¦ · professional and amateur sports...
TRANSCRIPT
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Sports Betting and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
Michael Hoenig, General CounselNational Indian Gaming Commission
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Created by Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2704)
Regulates over 500 gaming facilities operated by 241 Tribes
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
• “Provides a system for joint regulation by tribes and the federal government…” S. Rep. 100-446 (1988)
• Purposes:o Promote Tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal
governmentso Provide a statutory basis for regulation of gaming by tribeo Establish NIGC to protect gaming as a means to generate tribal revenue
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (28 U.S.C. 3701)
• Also known as “PASPA”
• Made it unlawful for States or their subdivisions to authorize sports betting. (28 U.S.C. 3702)
• PASPA allowed the Attorney General and professional and amateur sports organizations to bring civil actions to enjoin violations. (28 U.S.C. 3703)
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Murphy v. NCAA • 138 S. Ct. 1461
• “Prohibiting States from authorizing sports gambling” violates the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
• States may now legalize sports betting, “if they comply with other existing federal laws”
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
State sports book tally as of September 4, 2019:
• 13 states have legal, fully operable sports books: Arkansas, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and West Virginia
• 5 states and Washington, D.C. have passed sports betting legislation and are ready to launch within the next six months: Illinois, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee
• “26 states are moving toward legalization”
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
3 Basic Questions in the wake of Murphy:
Does a Tribe Want to offer sports betting?
Can a Tribe offer sports betting?
How does a tribe offer sports betting?
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Does a Tribe want to offer sports betting?
Each Tribe must decide for itself
based on a range of factors
relevant to it.
Revenue generator or
amenity?
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Can a Tribe operate a sports book?
Class III Game
(25 U.S.C. 2703;25 C.F.R. 502.4(c))
Requires compact(25 U.S.C.. 2710)
May require
change to existing compact
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
How does Tribe implement sports betting?
Self-operateIndividually
owned gaming
Management agreement
Consulting/vendor agreement
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Self-OperateTribe does everything in-
house
Sets odds
Decides whether/when to accept or stop accepting
wagers
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Individually Owned Gaming (25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(4); 25 C.F.R. 522.10)
• At least 60% of net revenue must go to Tribe. 25 C.F.R. 522.10(c)
• Must pay fees to NIGC. 25 C.F.R. 522.10(d)
• Licensing standards at least as restrictive as state law 25 C.F.R. 522.10(e)
• Apply state law standards with respect to purpose, entity, pot limits, and hours 25 C.F.R. 522.10(f)
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Management Agreement (25 U.S.C. 2711; 25 C.F.R. Parts 531 & 533)
• Must be submitted to Chair for approval. 533.1
• Management fee can be no more than 30%, but can go up to 40% with justification. 531.1(i)
• 5 year term limit, but can go up to 7 with justification. 531.1(h)
• Suitability determinations for management company. 533.6(b)
• NEPA
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Consulting or Vendor Agreement• Tribe maintains decision-making and management authority, but hires vendor or
consultant to provide information or advice
• Declination Letter: A legal opinion from OGC that states that draft documents submitted and reviewed are not management and do not violate SPI requirement.
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
De facto Management• Agreement gives no management authority to consultant or vendor
• Implementation of agreement leads to management without an approved contract
• Tribe should have someone with the expertise to make management decisions and decide whether to accept advice or information from vendor
D.C. Indian Law Conference21st Annual
#FBA #IndianLaw
Questions?