Slide 1

SPECIAL EDUCATION March 13, 2013 Curriculum and Instruction Committee Question and Answers Meeting Developing tomorrows leaders today

Slide 2

Referrals to CSE

Slide 3

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN CHILDREN NEED TO BE CLASSIFIED? PROCESS?

Slide 4

IS IT APPROPRIATE TO MODIFY A STUDENTS CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT WITHOUT AN IEP OR 504 ?

Slide 5

WHO MAKES THE FINAL DECISION IN A CSE MEETING?

Slide 6

CAN ANY STAFF MEMBER WORKING WITH A CHILD MAKE A REFERRAL?

Slide 7

SHOULD REGULAR EDUCATION TEACHERS BE CONSULTING AND/OR ADVISING PARENTS ON SPECIAL EDUCATION ISSUES OR CONCERNS IN ANY WAY?

Slide 8

SHOULD TEACHERS/STAFF BE ADVISING FAMILIES TO PUT THEIR CHILDREN ON MEDICATION OR SUGGESTING POTENTIAL DIAGNOSIS TO PARENTS?

Slide 9

WHY DO SOME REFERRALS TO CSE NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH IST?

Slide 10

WHO DETERMINES THAT THE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST IS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT DESIGNEE?

Slide 11

DO THE ACTUAL CURRICULUM APPROACHES AND INSTRUCTIONAL METHODOLOGIES NEED TO B E PROVIDED FOR A CSE REFERRAL? WHEN SHOULD WE EXPECT DISCUSSION OF THAT INFORMATION?

Slide 12

WHAT INTERVENTIONS ARE WE CURRENTLY USING TO ADDRESS STUDENT NEEDS PRIOR TO CLASSIFICATION?

Slide 13

IT WAS SAID THAT WE HEAVILY RELY ON RTI DATA. FOR WHAT TO CLASSIFY CHILDREN? TO CONTINUE RTI? WHAT SPECIFIC DATA ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? AIMSWEB?

Slide 14

HOW LONG DO CHILDREN TYPICALLY HAVE TO STAY AT THE TIERS BEFORE WE HAVE ENOUGH DATA TO CONSIDER CSE?

Slide 15

NOW THAT WE HAVE RTI WHAT DOES THE CSE REFERRAL PROCESS/FORM LOOK LIKE?

Slide 16

Classification and Declassification

Slide 17

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN IEP, 504, OR DECLASSIFICATION DOCUMENT?

Slide 18

WHY IS IT SUCH A BIG DEAL TO CLASSIFY A STUDENT?

Slide 19

WHY DO CHILDREN WHO HAVE LOW STANDARDIZED TEST SCORES WHEN EVALUATED, NOT QUALIFY FOR CSE?

Slide 20

WHAT ARE WE DOING TO ADDRESS THE FAMILIES WHO FEEL PRESSURED BY STAFF TO ACCEPT CSE SERVICES OR TO PUT THEIR CHILD OUT OF DISTRICT? WHY ARE SOME CHILDREN SENT OUT OF DISTRICT WITHOUT THE EVIDENCE THAT THE BIP HAS BEEN CONSISTENTLY FOLLOWED OR WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF AN FBA?

Slide 21

BEHAVIORAL DATA TRACKING IS BEING DONE BY SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS WHO ARE RECORDING WHAT THEY WANT AND CHANGING WHAT THEY WANT. WHAT BEHAVIORAL DATA TRACKING ARE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS RESPONSIBLE FOR?

Slide 22

DO WE FOLLOW DISCREPANCY MODEL OR RTI TO QUALIFY CHILDREN AT THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL? RTI IS MANDATED ONLY FOR GRADES K-4 READING, RIGHT?

Slide 23

WHAT ARE THE PATHWAYS A CHILD CAN QUALIFY FOR A LEARNING DISABILITY (LD) IN NYS?

Slide 24

WHAT DOES A PATTERN OF STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES MEAN IN TERMS OF A LEARNING DISABILITY (LD)?

Slide 25

WHAT MAKES A STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT VALID AND RELIABLE? WHAT IS A GOOD RELIABILITY COEFFICIENT? WHY IS THAT IMPORTANT? DO THE TESTS USED IN PSYCHO-EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS MEET THIS CRITERIA?

Slide 26

DOES THERE NEED TO BE EVIDENCE OF VARIED CURRICULUM APPROACHES TO JUSTIFY A LEARNING DISABILITY (LD)?

Slide 27

WOULD CURRICULUM GAPS OR PROBLEMS BE RELEVANT IN A LACK OF INSTRUCTION AS IT RELATES TO A LEARNING DISABILITY (LD) DISCUSSION?

Slide 28

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A READING DISABILITY AND A LEARNING DISABILITY?

Slide 29

WERE ANY CHILDREN PUT ON THE CSE REGISTER LAST YEAR OR THIS YEAR?

Slide 30

ARE THE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS PRESSURED TO DECLASSIFY STUDENTS?

Slide 31

WHAT IS THE POINT OF RE-TESTING STUDENTS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN FULLY ASSESSED AND PUT ON DECLASSIFICATION SUPPORT? IS THERE AN IMPACT TO THE CHILD?

Slide 32

WHAT SUPPORTS HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE IN REGULAR EDUCATION FOR DECLASSIFIED STUDENTS?

Slide 33

WHY AND WHERE ARE WE USING THE LINDAMOOD-BELL LIPS, SEEING STARS, AND VISUALIZING/VERBALIZING PROGRAMS? WHAT ARE THE FIVE PILLARS OF READING?

Slide 34

WHAT HAS CHANGED SO DRASTICALLY IN OUR TEACHING THAT CHILDREN HAVE GROWN TO GRADE LEVEL AND BEEN DECLASSIFIED TO BRING OUR NUMBERS FROM 20% TO 15%? HOW/WHAT DID OUR DISTRICT DO TO DECREASE OUR SPECIAL EDUCATION PERCENTAGES 3-5% FROM 09 -10 TO 13-14?

Slide 35

Professional/Certifications

Slide 36

CAN TEACHERS/STAFF OTHER THAN THE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST INTERPRET TEST SCORES UTILIZED AS PART OF A STUDENTS PSYCHO-EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION (REGARDLESS OF THE EVALUATION HAVING BEEN CONDUCTED BY DISTRICT STAFF OR NOT)?

Slide 37

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER REGARDING PROGRAMMING, IEP DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNICATION WITH PARENTS?

Slide 38

WHAT READING TRAINING HAVE THE PSYCHOLOGISTS HAD?

Slide 39

WHAT TRAINING HAVE READING TEACHERS HAD TO ANALYZE OR INTERPRET TEST RESULTS (SPEECH, AND PSYCH EVALUATIONS)?

Slide 40

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A READING TEACHER AND A READING SPECIALIST, AND HOW DOES THE SCOPE OF THEIR PRACTICE DIFFER? PLEASE PROVIDE EXAMPLES.

Slide 41

Programming

Slide 42

IS IT TRUE THAT STATE ED CAME OUT TO REVIEW THE ICM PROGRAM LAST YEAR? IF SO, WHAT DID THEY SAY?

Slide 43

HOW MANY COMPLAINTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO STATE ED WITHIN THE LAST 5 YEARS REGARDING SPECIAL EDUCATION?

Slide 44

HAS STATE ED PROVIDED US ANY FEEDBACK ON OUR CURRENT PROGRAMS AND PRACTICES?

Slide 45

IM SURE THAT THE POSITIVE ROLE MODELS OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS ARE HELPING OUT THE ICM KIDS, BUT ARE WE TRACKING HOW THE NEGATIVE BEHAVIORS OF THE ICM KIDS ARE AFFECTING OUR GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS?

Slide 46

Communication

Slide 47

WHAT IS THE FEEDBACK ON PSYCHO- EDUCATIONAL EVALUATIONS FROM OTHER DISTRICTS?

Slide 48

WHAT IS PREDETERMINATION AND PLEASE PROVIDE EXAMPLES? DO PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNT? DOES GOING OVER PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS AHEAD OF TIME COUNT?

Slide 49

TEACHERS ARE ASKED FOR A LOT OF INFORMATION TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE PSYCHOLOGISTS REPORT BEING COMPLETED AND WE DO NOT HEAR A BOUT IT UNTIL THE MEETING. CAN A PROCEDURE BE ESTABLISHED TO FOLLOW UP BEFORE THE MEETINGS SO EVERYONE IS ON THE SAME PAGE?

Slide 50

IS THERE A FORMAL PROCEDURE IN PLACE FOR THE RE- EVALUATION PROCESS FOR THE COMMITTEE THAT WILL BE AT THE MEETING? (THE PSYCHOLOGIST DOES ALL THE TESTING, SEND HOME RATING SCALES TO FILL OUT, TEACHERS ARE ASKED TO FILL OUT SURVEYS AND SCALES AND GIVE NARRATIVES ON THEIR STUDENTS, AND MAYBE WE GET AN EMAIL BACK ABOUT THE RESULTS)

Slide 51

WHY ARE WE TELLING PARENTS THAT OUR NUMBERS ARE TOO HIGH; THEREFORE, THEIR CHILD WILL NOT GET SERVICES ON THE CSE REGISTER?

Slide 52

Training

Slide 53

WHEN WILL TRAINING BE PROVIDED THAT HELPS DISTINGUISH BETWEEN INTERVENTIONS AND ACCOMMODATIONS/MODIFICATIONS?

Slide 54

WOULD ADDITIONAL TRAINING IN ACCURATE DATA COLLECTION (WITHOUT THE USE OF SUBJECTIVE OR INFLAMMATORY LANGUAGE) BE HELPFUL?

Slide 55

Additional Comments

Slide 56

PBCS ISM CLASS WAS NOT INITIALLY MODELED AFTER ANYTHING. A BRAND NEW TEACHER WAS (AND LET GO) AND NEVER REALLY GIVEN ANY GUIDELINES. GUIDELINES CAME MID-YEAR AFTER STAFF PUSHED AND QUESTIONED AND PUSHED AND QUESTIONED. VISITS WERE MADE TO BETHLEHEM, A DESCRIPTION WRITTEN, ETC. AROUND FEBRUARY OF 2012. LAST YEAR WAS A HORRENDOUS YEAR FOR BOTH TEACHERS, TEACHER ASSISTANTS AND STUDENTS AT PBC DUE TO THE LACK OF PLANNING FOR THE ICM CLASSES. THE UNDERSTANDING IS IT HASNT CHANGED MUCH BUT THAT TEACHERS ARE EITHER AFRAID TO SPEAK UP OR DO NOT HAVE THE TIME BECAUSE THEY ARE TRYING TO KEEP THEIR HEADS ABOVE WATER. NOT SO SURE PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS ARE WRITTEN SO PARENTS CAN UNDERSTAND THEM. ALSO THE INITIAL LETTERS SENT TO PARENTS ARE OFTEN DECEIVING AND/OR DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND; THEREFORE, HOLDING UP OR EXTENDING THE PROCESS. I KEEP HEARING TEAM BUT THAT IS NOT REALLY PUT IN TO PRACTICE.

Slide 57

AIMSweb and RtI Follow Up Meeting Being Scheduled with an AIMSweb Representative to Address Questions Related To These Topics.