special category grant application staff review fy 2020 … · the archaeological report shall...
TRANSCRIPT
SPECIAL CATEGORY GRANT APPLICATION
STAFF REVIEW FY 2020-2022
Division of Historical Resources Department of State, Florida
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 1
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.012
TITLE: Dorr House Window and Door Restoration
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: West Florida Historic Preservation, Inc
PROJECT LOCATION: 311 S Adams Street, Pensacola, Escambia County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Window & door degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $38,500.00
Match Amount: $39,626.00
Total Budget Amount: $78,126.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Window Restoration
Door Restoration
Grant Administration
Window Conservator Fee
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated that professional window conservator services have been retained for this
project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
If funded, applicant is to delete travel expenses and per diem services as non-allowable items perthe Grant guidelines.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
If funded, applicant is to delete travel expenses and per diem costs from the budget as non-allowable grant expenditures as per the Grant guidelines.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 2
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.300.098
TITLE: Exploring the Settlement and Fleet of Tristan de Luna on Pensacola Bay
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: University of West Florida
PROJECT LOCATION: East Pensacola Heights and surrounding waters of Pensacola Bay,Pensacola, Escambia County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Site disturbanceDemolition
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $433,280.00
Match Amount: $433,281.00
Total Budget Amount: $866,561.00
PROJECT TYPE: Archaeological Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
FieldworkEquipment and boat rentalExpendable field and lab suppliesArtifact and sample laboratory analysisArtifact processing, conservation, and curationArchival researchReport preparationPublic outreachGrant administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional archaeological services are required and included in the project scope of work and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
The archaeological report shall conform to Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code. A 1A-32 permit must be obtained fromthe Bureau of Archaeological Research prior to the beginning of fieldwork conducted on state lands, if applicable.
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 3
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.011
TITLE: Washington Recreational Center f/k/a the Washington High School Gym
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Gulf County Board of County Comissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 407 Kenny Street, Port St. Joe, Gulf County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Hurricane damage
Interior materials and finish degradation
Window degradation
Infrastructure upgrades
Wood rot
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $316,800.00
Match Amount: $79,200.00
Total Budget Amount: $396,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
New flooring & installation
Windows & labor
Restore existing bleachers
Hot water heater installation
New side walk
Replace stage
Bathroom renovation
Exterior and interior painting
Engineering fees
Contractor fees
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Scope of Work item(s) are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category Grants Guidelinessection IV:
Switching out lighting
New PA system
Hot water heater installation
Stage restoration should be in-kind material in lieu of engineered flooring.
Court flooring should be in-kind replacement or restoration of the existing materials in lieu of sportsflooring material.
New side walk to be verified if it is part of the ADA path from the parking pad to the front door. Ifnot this would be a non-allowable expense and removed from the project budget. ($13,000.00)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the project scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 4 – Removal of non-original element(s) that have acquired historic significance
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 15 Preservation of Historic Concrete
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Delete line item "Hot water heater install"
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Delete line item "Hot water heater install" at a cost of $1,500.00.
Reducing the cost equal to:
Grant award = $315,600.00
Match amount = $78,900.00
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 4
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.015
TITLE: Historic Centennial Building
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Port St. Joe
PROJECT LOCATION: 2201 Centennial Drive, Port St. Joe, Gulf County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Hurricane damage
Water / Moisture infiltration
Interior finish degradation
Structural degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $291,154.00
Match Amount: $72,789.00
Total Budget Amount: $363,943.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Low Pressure Wash and Soft Scrub
Cracked Stucco Repair
Recoating Exterior Walls
Scupper Enlargement and Flashing
Removal, Repair, and Reinstallation of Leaderheads and Downspouts
Window Restoration
Wood Flooring Restoration
Wood Ceiling Restoration
Replace HVAC System
Architect / Engineering Fees, Permitting
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
Applicant has indicated that professional Contractor services and fees have been included withinthe project Scope of Work.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 5
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.106
TITLE: Historic Port Theatre Post Hurricane Michael Repairs
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Port Theatre Art & Culture Center
PROJECT LOCATION: 314 Reid Avenue, Port St. Joe, Gulf County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural failure / Instability (Above Grade)
Hurricane damage
Water / Moisture damage
Exposure to natural elements
Masonry degradation
Delayed maintenance
Roof failure
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $125,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $625,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Engineering and Plans
Building Permit
Demolition
Structural Repair to Steel Framing
Roof System and Structural Repair
Exterior Brick Repair
Replace Exterior Doors and Windows
Restore Original Entry Doors
Replace Electrical
Architectural Fees
General Contractor Fee
General Conditions
Foam Insulation
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
The use of spray foam insulation is not to be used on the historic fabric of the building.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering / Contractor services are required and have been includedin the project scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 2 Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 6
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.123
TITLE: Renovation of HCDC Campus
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Havana Community Development Corporation, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 264 Carver Avenue, Havana, Gadsden County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Vandalism / Security issues
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $125,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $625,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Construction Documents
Electrical & Plumbing
Heat and Air Conditioning Hardware
Painting
Wall Repairs
Lighting Fixtures
Restroom Fixtures
Roof Repair or Replacement
Project Administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated Contractor services and fees are included in line items within the totalScope of Work.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
If funded, grant administration cannot exceed 5% of the grant award amount.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 7
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.700.040
TITLE: Acquisition & Preservation of The Planter's Exchange, a national historic site
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Havana History & Heritage Society, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 204 NW Second Street, Havana, Gadsden County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
The applicant sites the following threats:
Weather related eventsGeneral deteriorationNeglect by current owner
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $67,500.00
Match Amount: $22,500.00
Total Budget Amount: $90,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Acquisition Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Purchase a section of the old Planter's exchange by the Havana Heritage and History Society, Inc.
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
If funded, an updated land survey must be provided which confirms that parcel can be purchased as stand-alone property.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
None
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
None
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 8
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.030
TITLE: Fort Coombs Armory Phase III
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Franklin County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 66 4th Street, Apalachicola, Franklin County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
Window degradation
Infrastructure upgrades
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $265,286.00
Match Amount: $200,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $465,286.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Design & Permitting
Construction of Fire Sprinkler System
Repair of Windows
Construction Administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated that professional Architectural / Engineering / Contractor services havebeen retained for this project.
This is an ongoing project. Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and havebeen included in the project scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 9
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.094
TITLE: Raney House Restoration Phase I
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Apalachicola Area Historic Society
PROJECT LOCATION: 128 Market Street, Apalachicola, Franklin County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
Water / Moisture infiltration
Infrastructure upgrades
Exterior finish degradation
Structural stabilization
Wood destroying organisms
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $157,697.00
Match Amount: $39,494.00
Total Budget Amount: $197,191.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Foundation & Substructure stabilization
Window restoration
Column restoration
Exterior & Painting
Electrical upgrades
Architect/Engineer services
Grant administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated contractor fees are included in line items within the total Scope of Work.
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 28 Painting Historic Interiors
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 10
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.108
TITLE: Crooked River Lighthouse and Keeper's House Museum Rehabilitation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Carrabelle Lighthouse Association, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 1975 Hwy 98 W, Carrabelle, Franklin County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural degradation
Exterior finish degradation
Wood rot
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $85,500.00
Match Amount: $28,500.00
Total Budget Amount: $114,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Grant administration
Repainting of the keeper's house museum, porches, ramps and attached washhouse.
Repair and replacement of rotting and decayed ramp and washhouse components
Pressure wash and prepare Keeper's House Museum
Treat spot damage, preparation and repairing of Lighthouse tower
Erection of scaffolding around tower
Architect Services
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Pressure washing historic fabric as per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
Preservation Brief 45 Preserving Historic Wood Porches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 11
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.700.010
TITLE: Acquisition of Lewis Spring House by Spring House Institute, Inc.
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Spring House Institute, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 3117 Okeeheepkee Road, Tallahassee, Leon County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Development pressureLeaking roofErosion issuesDeferred maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $247,500.00
Match Amount: $271,300.00
Total Budget Amount: $518,800.00
PROJECT TYPE: Acquisition Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Purchase of the Spring House by the Spring House Institute, Inc.
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
None
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
None
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 12
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.080
TITLE: FAMU Gibbs Cottage Rehabilitation Project
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Florida A&M University
PROJECT LOCATION: Florida A&M University campus, Tallahassee, Leon County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Deterioration by neglect
Exterior material degradation
Interior material degradation
Wood rot
Structural degradation
Roof failure
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $97,746.00
Match Amount: $98,179.00
Total Budget Amount: $195,925.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Plan Project
Document Historical Significance
Document Existing Bldg
Develop Program
Evaluate Existing Bldg
Finalize Program
Develop Estimate
Final Report
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Scope of Work item(s) are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category Grants Guidelinessection IV as a Development Project:
Document Historical Significance
Develop Program
Finalize Program
Develop Estimate
Final Report
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural services are required and have been included in the project scope andbudget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 17 Architectural Character—Identifying the Visual Aspects of HistoricBuildings
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
Preservation Brief 35 Understanding Old Buildings - The Process of ArchitecturalInvestigation
Preservation Brief 45 Preserving Historic Wood Porches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Delete line items listed as non-allowable Development grant services:
Document Historical Significance
Develop Program
Finalize Program
Develop Estimate
Final Report
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Delete line items listed as non-allowable Development grant costs:
Document Historical Significance = $37,379
Develop Program = $23,259
Finalize Program = $23,846
Develop Estimate = $10,907
Final Report = $14,067
Grant Fund staff recommendation = $43,234.00
Cash Match staff recommendation = $43,234.00
Total Project Budget = $86,468.00
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 13
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.029
TITLE: Sopchoppy High School
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Wakulla County School Board
PROJECT LOCATION: 164 Yellow Jacket, Sopchoppy, Wakulla County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Roof failure
Water / Moisture infiltration
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $400,000.00
Match Amount: $100,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $500,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Re-roof
Structural Repairs
A/E Fees, Permits
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the project
scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
None
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 14
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.300.006
TITLE: Wacissa and Wakulla Rivers - Flowing through Time
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Aucilla Research Institute, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: Wacissa and Wakulla Rivers, Jefferson County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing ResourcesIndividual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Site erosionSaltwater intrusionLooting
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $125,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $625,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Archaeological Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Archaeological Research Project:
Remote sensingFieldworkVideo survey and mappingArtifact and sample analysisReport preparation
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional archaeological services are required and included in the project scope of work and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
The archaeological survey report shall conform to Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code. A 1A-32 permit must be obtainedfrom the Bureau of Archaeological Research prior to the beginning of fieldwork conducted on state lands, if applicable.
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 15
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.009
TITLE: Jefferson County Historic Monticello High School Restoration
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 425 West Washington Street, Monticello, Jefferson County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural stabilization
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $250,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $750,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Historic 1915 Addition Restoration interior rebuild
Restore 15 interior wood doors, frames & transoms
Restore/replace exterior deteriorated wood work
Paint exterior wood work
Waterproof Basement walls
Waterproofing of existing gutters
Restore 10 Double Hung Wood Windows
Arch/Eng Services
Reports, Closeout, & Final Inspection
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated contractor fees are included in line items within the total Scope of Work.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 16
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.121
TITLE: Old Hamilton County Jail and Historical Museum Restoration Project - Phase I
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Hamilton County Historical Museum Incorporated
PROJECT LOCATION: 501 Northeast 1st Avenue, Jasper, Hamilton County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Roof failure
Water / Moisture intrusion
Interior finish degradation
Structural degradation
Mold infiltration
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $50,000.00
Match Amount: $12,500.00
Total Budget Amount: $62,500.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architectural Services
Roof Replacement & Associated Components
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural services have been included in the project scope and budget.
Applicant has verified a professional contractor with documented historic preservation experiencewill be hired for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 16 The Use of Substitute Materials on Historic Building Exteriors
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 17
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.027
TITLE: CCC - River Bathhouse Renovation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Friends of Fort Clinch
PROJECT LOCATION: 2601 Atlantic Ave, Fernandina Beach, Nassau County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $100,000.00
Match Amount: $25,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $125,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Engineering & Design & Permitting
Contract Labor and Supplies
Site supervision and additional repairs
Additional Materials and Equipment
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Lack of Architectural service fees
Select Scope of Work item(s) that are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category GrantsGuidelines section IV:
Removal of Sewer Lift Station and Well System
Interactive high quality interpretive material
Exterior landscape and recreational improvements (bench interpretive display)
Additional Materials and Equipment:
The various hand and power tools necessary to complete the in-kind-labor portion of thematch. These funds will also be used for the interpretive and educational material
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural services are required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Scope of Work item(s) are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category Grants Guidelinessection IV:
Delete line item "Removal of Sewer Lift Station and Well System"
Delete line item "Interactive high quality interpretive material"
Delete line item "Exterior landscape and recreational improvements (bench interpretivedisplay)"
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Scope of Work item(s) are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category Grants Guidelinessection IV:
Delete line item "Removal of Sewer Lift Station and Well System" at a cost of $10,000.00.
Delete line item "Interactive high quality interpretive material" at a cost of $20,000.00.
Delete line item "Exterior landscape and recreational improvements (bench interpretivedisplay)" at a cost of $5,000.00.
Delete line item "Additional Materials and Equipment" at a cost of $6,250.00. (Cash Match)
Total Grant request = $67,000.00
Total Cash Match & In-kind Match reduction = $16,750.00
Total Project budget = $83,750.00
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 18
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.001
TITLE: Old Methodist Church Stain Glass Restoration and preservation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: New Beginnings Apostolic Church Inc
PROJECT LOCATION: 345 W. Main St., Lake Butler, Union County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Window degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $48,711.00
Match Amount: $13,579.00
Total Budget Amount: $62,290.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Window restoration
Conservator project manager & labor fee
Storm glass windows & installation for 15 windows
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional conservator services are required for this project and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 33 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Stained and Leaded Glass
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 19
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.004
TITLE: Concerned Citizens of Bradford County
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Concerned Citizens of Bradford County
PROJECT LOCATION: 1080 North Pine Street, Starke, Bradford County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Vandalism / Security issues
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $92,058.00
Match Amount: $29,582.00
Total Budget Amount: $121,640.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Reroof
HVAC upgrades
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated Architect/Engineering/Contractor fees will be paid from a separate fundingsource other than the Grant budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 20
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.102
TITLE: Foreman's House Preservation Project
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Beaches Area Historical Society, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 425 Beach Boulevard, Jacksonville Beach, Duval County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Roof failure
Hazardous materials - Lead paint removal
Water / Moisture intrusion
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $41,088.00
Match Amount: $41,088.00
Total Budget Amount: $82,176.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Roof Replacement
Lead paint testing & removal
Interior Painting
Exterior Porch Ceiling painting
Window Repair
Porch/Ramp/Wood Repair
Attic Climate Control
Grant Administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated Engineering fees will be paid from a separate funding source other than theGrant budget for lead paint remediation and attic climate control.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 37 Appropriate Methods for Reducing Lead-Paint Hazards in HistoricHousing
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 21
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.114
TITLE: Florida Theatre Painting Restoration Project
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Florida Theatre Performing Arts Center, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 128 East Forsyth Street, Jacksonville, Duval County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $349,764.00
Match Amount: $349,765.00
Total Budget Amount: $699,529.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Paint Investigation
Paint Restoration Work
Lease Scaffolding for 12 Weeks
Tapestry Restoration
Architectural Conservator Finish Analysis
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional conservator services are required for this project and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 21 Repairing Historic Flat Plaster Walls and Ceilings
Preservation Brief 23 Preserving Historic Ornamental Plaster
Preservation Brief 28 Painting Historic Interiors
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 22
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.022
TITLE: Keystone Pavilion Feasibility Study
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Keystone Heights
PROJECT LOCATION: 565 S Lawrence Blvd, Keystone Heights, Clay County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Vandalism / Security issues
Exposure to natural elements
Wood rot
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $25,000.00
Match Amount: $25,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $50,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Survey - Boundary and topographical Survey
GeoTechnical Study - Conduct Geo-technical conditions of the structure and adjacent area.
Civil/ Structural Engineer Study
Schematics Design Phase Development
Architectural Design Study for Future Use -Study Interior Spaces
HVAC Studies - HVAC/MEP
Building and Site Analysis - Building and Site Analysis
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Scope of Work item(s) are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category Grants Guidelinessection IV:
Survey
GeoTechnical Study - partial, "adjacent area"
Civil/ Structural Engineer Study - partial, "Civil Study"
Architectural Design Study for Future Use
HVAC Studies
Building and Site Analysis - partial, "Site Analysis"
Not taking the design drawings through Construction Documents.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural services are required and has been indicated by applicant to be avolunteer service.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional Architectural / Engineering services.
Remove "Architectural Design Study for Future Use"
Remove "Building and Site Analysis"
Remove Geotechnical Study of site "adjacent area"
Remove "Survey"
Remove "HVAC Studies"
Remove "Civil Engineer Study"
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional Architectural / Engineering fees if fees are to be paid through the Grantfunds.
Remove "Survey" = $8,500.00: (Grant @$4,250.00; Match @$2,125; In-kind @ $2,125.00)
Remove "Architectural Design Study for Future Use" = $2,000.00: (Grant @$1,000.00; Match@$500.00; In-kind @$500.00)
Remove "Building and Site Analysis" = $5,500.00: (Grant @$2,750.00; Match @$1,375.00; In-kind @$1,375.00)
Remove Geotechnical Study cost labeled site "adjacent area" = TBD
Remove Civil Engineering study cost = $4,250.00 (Staff recommendation - half of requestedamount)
Remove HVAC studies = $5,000.00: (Grant @$2,500.00; Cash Match @$1,250.00; In-kind@$1,250.00)
Total Grant Award = $12,375.00
Total Eligible Match = $6,188.00
Total In-kind Match = $6,188.00
Total budget = $24,750.00
This reallocation of funding is in accordance with the non-allowable grant expenditures for theDevelopment Project Guidelines.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 23
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.054
TITLE: Clay County Historical Courthouse Facility Restoration Project
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Clay County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 915 Walnut Street, Green Cove Springs, Clay County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Individual Local Designation
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture infiltration
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $150,000.00
Match Amount: $150,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $300,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Stucco repair and paint
Window restoration
Masonry repairs, steps and column restoration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated Architect/Engineering/Contractor fees will be paid from a separate funding
source other than the Grant budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 15 Preservation of Historic Concrete
Preservation Brief 22 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Stucco
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 24
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.003
TITLE: Flagler Memorial Presbyterian Manse Rehabilitation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Memorial Presbyterian Church Society of St. Augustine, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 34 Sevilla Street, St. Augustine, St. Johns County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture infiltration
Inappropriate construction methods
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $250,000.00
Match Amount: $250,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $500,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architectural/Engineering Services
Clean and repair concrete, brick and terra cotta surfaces
Repair roof and gutters
Repair windows and doors, frames, surrounds
Repair wood damage including balcony roof structure and soffits
Repair chimneys and lightning protection
Paint surfaces and apply exterior coating
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated that professional Architectural / Engineering / Contractor services havebeen retained for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 30 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Clay Tile Roofs
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 25
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.300.105
TITLE: First Coast Maritime Archaeology Project: Identifying Maritime Heritage Sites At Risk
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Lighthouse Archaeological Maritime Program, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 81 Lighthouse Avenue, St. Augustine, St. Johns County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
LootingAccidental destructionClimate change and environmental impactErosionPollutionNatural disasters
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $643,385.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,143,385.00
PROJECT TYPE: Archaeological Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Field workArchaeological surveyArtifact conservationEquipment and servicesExpendable suppliesPublic archaeology outreachReport preparationGrant administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Project overlap exists with a grant application submitted by LAMP for a Hurricane Irma NPSSubgrant, including purchase of the same equipment and investigation of the same sites. If the
Hurricane Irma NPS Subgrant is funded, these items must be removed from the current scope ofwork and budget or the Special Category grant application must be withdrawn.
The continued investigations and broad scope of work for the proposed project also presentconcerns. If funded, a strict special project scope of work must be proposed.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional archaeological services are required and included in the project scope of work and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
The archaeological report shall conform to Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code. A 1A-32 permit must be obtained fromthe Bureau of Archaeological Research prior to the beginning of fieldwork conducted on state lands, if applicable.
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 26
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.200.032
TITLE: Florida Water Exhibit at the Florida Museum of Natural History
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: University of Florida
PROJECT LOCATION: 3215 Hull Road, Gainesville, Alachua County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Electrical system failureAccessibility issuesLoss of attendanceLoss of educational impactOutdated information
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $500,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,000,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Museum Exhibit Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Final exhibit design and preparation of artifacts and mediaPrevious exhibit demolitionInfrastructure upgradesExhibit fabricationExhibit installation
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional museum exhibit design services are required and included in the project scope of work and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
None
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 27
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.124
TITLE: Smith-Griffin House Rehabilitation Phase II
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: The Pleasant Street Historic Society
PROJECT LOCATION: 321 NW 8th Avenue, Gainesville, Alachua County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
Vandalism / Security issues
Wood destroying organisms
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $75,000.00
Match Amount: $75,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $150,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Plans drawn
Permits
Selective Demolition
Level Building
Repair or replace floor framing
Repair or recreate windows
MEP upgrades
Add insulation
Install beadboard or drywall
Install ADA ramp
Paint interior and exterior
Install new flooring
Project supervision
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Recommend to Applicant to prioritize Scope of Work, it appears that the Scope of Work is in excessof the Project Budget.
Professional Architectural services appear to be at variance with the proposed line items indicated.Professional Engineering and Contractor services appear to not be accounted for in the Scope ofWork and Project Budget.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
Professional Engineering services are required but have not been included in the project scope andbudget.
Professional Architectural services and fees have been accounted for but appear to be at variancewith the proposed work.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 3 – Create a false sense of historical development or adding conjectural feature(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 17 Architectural Character—Identifying the Visual Aspects of HistoricBuildings
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Prioritize building envelope and structural stabilization line items.
Allow for professional design services and contractor services if grant funds are to be used forpayment.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Prioritize building envelope and structural stabilization line items costs.
Allow for professional design fees and contractor fees if grant funds are to be used for payment.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 28
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.016
TITLE: Historic Melrose Woman's Club Rehabilitaton
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Melrose Woman's Club, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 303 Pine Street, Melrose, Putnam County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Infrastructure upgrades
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $52,500.00
Match Amount: $13,125.00
Total Budget Amount: $65,625.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Demolition of existing kitchen and restroom
Lower present kitchen and restroom floors and replace 2 masonry piers
Remove interior load wall between kitchen and existing bathroom
Widen 2 doorways between meeting hall and 1896 rear addition from meeting hall to existingkitchen. Add 2 custom doors and hinge systems.
Reframe and replace (custom) door between kitchen and rear storage area leading to rear exit
Insulate roof and rear wall of storage area. Cover with drywall, prep and paint
Frame in and appropriately furnish ADA compliant restroom
Create historically appropriate appearing kitchen in remodeled space and appropriately furnish- per grant guidelines
Install and test a fire safety system.
Install a 2 stall cement handicapped parking pad with ADA markings, signage and wheel stops
Grant administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Scope of Work appears to be in excess of Project Budget.
Verifying work is being done correctly for altering the floor heights in the building.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been accounted for inprevious grant application.
Professional contractor services are required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 4 – Removal of non-original element(s) that have acquired historic significance
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 35 Understanding Old Buildings - The Process of ArchitecturalInvestigation
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended at this time.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended at this time.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 29
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.019
TITLE: The Marion Hotel, AKA the Sovereign Building, Facade Restoration
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Ocala Growth Management Dept.
PROJECT LOCATION: 108 N Magnolia, Ocala, Marion County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Window degradation
Water / Moisture infiltration
Wood rot
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $406,000.00
Match Amount: $406,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $812,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Mobilization, general conditions
Lifts, scaffolds, swing stage
Replace rotten wood in windows openings
Restore fanlights & transoms
Restore windows
Prep & paint
Architectural / Engineering services
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated contractor and window conservator services and fees are included in lineitems within the total Scope of Work and Project Budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 30
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.070
TITLE: Dade City Train Depot Renovations
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Dade City
PROJECT LOCATION: 14206 Hwy 98 Bypass, Dade City, Pasco County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
General disrepair
Masonry degradation
Exposure to natural elements
Window degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $14,675.00
Match Amount: $22,975.00
Total Budget Amount: $37,650.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Electrical upgrades
Lighting upgrades
Replace & repair wood flooring
Stain glass restoration
Brickwork restoration & re-pointing mortar joints
ADA upgrades
Repair exterior decking
Interior restoration & repair
Permits and Inspections
Project Management and Administrative Costs
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Lack of window protection on the rail side of the depot.
Scope of Work appears to be in excess of Project Budget.
Project Management and Administrative Costs appear to be in excess as compared to the ProjectBudget:
5% Administrative Costs of $14,675.00 = $734.00
Project Management = $5,766.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional contractor services are required for this project and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required for this project. Engineering servicescan be limited based on a simple switch out of electrical components.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 2 Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional Architectural / Engineering services.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional Architectural / Engineering fees if grant funds are to be used for payment.
If funded, grant administration cannot exceed 5% of the grant award amount.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 31
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.064
TITLE: Polk County History Center - Exterior Window Restoration and Exterior Door Repair
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Polk County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 100 East Main Street, Bartow, Polk County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Window degradation
Exterior material degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $463,344.00
Match Amount: $486,344.00
Total Budget Amount: $949,688.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Window Repair/ Restoration
Window Trim
Exterior Door Repair
Architectural Engineering Services
Grant Administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional window conservator services are required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 3 Improving Energy Efficiency in Historic Buildings
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional window conservator services.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional window conservator fees.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 32
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.068
TITLE: Phase 2: College of Law Fountains
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Stetson University, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 1401 61st St South, Gulfport, Pinellas County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural failure / Instability (Above Grade)
Soils instability
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $510,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,010,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Removal, restoration, and reinstallation of historical tile
Removal of existing failed substructure and installation of new structural base
Installation of filtration lines to these 3 fountains
Installation of code required grating and pipe stands in Fountain #4
Install new pavers, sidewalks, sod and landscaping for fountain renovated with previous grantplus 3 fountains renovated with this grant.
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Proposed sidewalk, sodding and landscaping services.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been accounted for inprevious grant application.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 40 Preserving Historic Ceramic Tile Floors
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
If funded, applicant is to delete sidewalk and landscaping services as non-allowable items perthe Grant guidelines. Sod replacement services are limited to immediate erosion control to thefountain pavers.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
If funded, applicant is to delete sidewalk and landscaping costs from the budget as non-allowable grant expenditures as per the Grant guidelines. In addition, sod repair will only entailimmediate erosion control to the fountain pavers.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 33
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.084
TITLE: Restoration of the Turner Bungalow
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Pinellas County Government
PROJECT LOCATION: 11909 125th Street, Largo, Pinellas County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Wood destroying organisms
Exterior material degradation
Structural stabilization
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $121,868.00
Match Amount: $121,868.00
Total Budget Amount: $243,736.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architectural services
Interior restoration
Exterior restoration
Building systems
Painting & abatement
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
"Insulate walls using reversible materials". This could cause irreversible damage to historic fabricand should be reviewed by staff before any wall insulation is installed.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Standard 9 – Incompatible new addition(s), exterior alteration(s), or related new constructiondestroying historic materials
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 16 The Use of Substitute Materials on Historic Building Exteriors
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
Preservation Brief 21 Repairing Historic Flat Plaster Walls and Ceilings
Preservation Brief 28 Painting Historic Interiors
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
Preservation Brief 37 Appropriate Methods for Reducing Lead-Paint Hazards in HistoricHousing
Preservation Brief 45 Preserving Historic Wood Porches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow the removal of the proposed wall insulation if possible damage to historic fabric will occur.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for cost reduction related to the proposed installation of wall insulation if necessary.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 34
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.104
TITLE: Central High School Rehabilitation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Pinellas County Schools
PROJECT LOCATION: 2501 Fifth Avenue, St. Petersburg, Pinellas County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
No immediate threat indicated.
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $502,884.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,002,884.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Restore historic terra cotta
Restore historic stairs
Remove infill at second floor historic library balcony archways
Re-point historic brickwork
Restore 2nd floor skylights
Restore wood & glass “storefronts”
Restore decorative trim and paint work at the small auditorium
Repair historic covered walkway ceilings at 2nd & 3rd floors
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural/Engineering services have been verified and accounted for as part of acampus wide project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 2 Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings
Preservation Brief 7 The Preservation of Historic Glazed Architectural Terra Cotta
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 35
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.200.107
TITLE: Explore Florida! The research, design, fabrication and installation of a permanent Floridahistory gallery exhibit in the St. Petersburg Museum of History
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: St. Petersburg Historical Society, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 335 2nd Avenue NE, St. Petersburg, Pinellas County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
FloodingHurricane damageOutdated information
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $700,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,200,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Museum Exhibit Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Final exhibit designResearch and curation of artifactsExhibit fabricationExhibit installationElectronic infrastructure upgrades
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Museum Exhibit services are required and included in the project scope of work andbudget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
None
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 36
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.087
TITLE: Archie Smith Fish House Restoration Phase III
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Indian River County Parks Division
PROJECT LOCATION: 1740 N. Indian River Drive, Sebastian, Indian River County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Hurricane damage
Exposure to natural elements
Delayed maintenance
Structural degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $147,121.00
Match Amount: $147,124.00
Total Budget Amount: $294,245.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architectural Design
Structural Engineering
Local/State/federal Permitting & Mobilization
Construction:
Demolition of existing pilings
New replacement pilings
Floor structure restoration
Partial demolition of concrete floor, thermal ceiling, and metal roof.
Patch and repair of concrete floor, thermal ceiling, and metal roof.
Patch and repair wood pier for 4 new external piles
Construction Administration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated contractor fees are included in line items within the total Scope of Work.
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 37
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.065
TITLE: People's Bank of Okeechobee Rehabilitation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Okeechobee Utility Authority
PROJECT LOCATION: 100 SW Fifth Avenue, Okeechobee, Okeechobee County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
No immediate threat indicated.
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $181,026.00
Total Budget Amount: $681,026.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Exterior/Interior demolition
Repair/restore exterior façade
New windows/doors
Roof repair
Restore pressed metal ceilings
Repair interior wall finishes
Interior remodeling
Painting
Contractor's general conditions and fees
Professional services fees
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
Preservation Brief 21 Repairing Historic Flat Plaster Walls and Ceilings
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments is recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 38
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.052
TITLE: Peacock House and Peacock Lodge Preservation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Port St Lucie Community Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT LOCATION: 2410 SE Westmoreland Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Mold Infiltration
Hazardous materials
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $250,000.00
Match Amount: $250,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $500,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Lodge:
Selective Demolition
Mold Remediation
Historic Porch Restoration
Historic Window Restoration
Restore 6 Exterior Doors
Structural Repairs
Exterior Paint
House:
Selective Demolition
Asbestos Abatement
Mold Remediation
Lead-Based Paint Remediation
Historic Window Remediation
Structural Repairs
Restore 5 Exterior Doors at House
A/E Services
Contractor Fees
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Lack of window conservator oversight.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated that professional Architectural / Engineering / Contractor services havebeen retained for this project.
Allow for window conservator services for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 3 – Create a false sense of historical development or adding conjectural feature(s)
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
Preservation Brief 45 Preserving Historic Wood Porches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional window conservator services if grant funds are to be used for payment.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional window conservator fees if grant funds are to be used for payment.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 39
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.028
TITLE: Rehabilitation of Warm Mineral Springs Cyclorama
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of North Port
PROJECT LOCATION: 12200 San Servando Avenue, North Port, Sarasota County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Determined Eligible by the National Park Service or Potentially Eligible by the Division
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural Instability (Above Grade)
Infrastructure upgrades
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $850,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,350,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Roof Repairs
Mechanical, Electrical, Lighting
Stucco, Ceiling, Window, Door and Wall Repair
ADA Concrete Modification/Floor Finish
Historical Mural Restoration
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
Professional conservator services are required for this project and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional Architectural / Engineering services if grant funds are to be used forpayment.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Applicant to verify professional Architectural / Engineering fees are included in proposed ProjectBudget.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 40
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.033
TITLE: Selby House Restoration Phase 2 - Interior
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 926 S. Palm Ave., Sarasota, Sarasota County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture intrusion
Exterior finish degradation
Roof failure
Infrastructure upgrades
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $387,523.00
Match Amount: $387,524.00
Total Budget Amount: $775,047.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
General Requirements
Concrete Repairs
Carpentry work
Roofing
Insulation
Storefront/Glazing
Framing/Drywall
Painting
HVAC upgrades
Lighting
Exterior Staircase
External LULA Elevator
General Liability Insurance
Builder's Risk Insurance
Architect Fees
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Standard 9 – Incompatible new addition(s), exterior alteration(s), or related new constructiondestroying historic materials
Standard 10 - New additions and adjacent or related new construction not reversible
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 3 Improving Energy Efficiency in Historic Buildings
Preservation Brief 11 Rehabilitating Historic Storefronts
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 41
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.090
TITLE: Municipal Auditorium - Recreation Club (Sarasota Exhibition Hall) Structural ProjectPhase II
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Sarasota
PROJECT LOCATION: 803 North Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, Sarasota County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Determined Eligible by the National Park Service or Potentially Eligible by the Division
Individual Local Designation
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Wood rot
Structural degradation
Curtain wall window degradation
Exterior material degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $262,837.00
Match Amount: $262,837.00
Total Budget Amount: $525,674.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Windows (glass wall)
Structural - First Floor Decking
Flooring
Concrete Decking with ADA Compliance
General Conditions
Payment and Performance Bond (City requirement)
Building Permit
Project Management (City)
Architectural and Engineering Services
Construction Management Services
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Scope of Work item(s) are Non-Allowable Costs per the Special Category Grants Guidelinessection IV:
Payment and Performance Bond (City requirement)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
This is an ongoing project, Professional Architectural / Engineering / Contracting services havebeen verified and accounted for.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 9 – Incompatible new addition(s), exterior alteration(s), or related new constructiondestroying historic materials
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 15 Preservation of Historic Concrete
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Remove line item "Payment and Performance Bond" from the Scope of Work as a non-allowablegrant expenditure.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Remove line item "Payment and Performance Bond" from the Project budget as a non-allowablegrant expenditure = $8,636.00.
This reduces the Grant award and cash match to $258,519.00 each.
Total project budget = $517,038.00
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 42
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.045
TITLE: Arcadia City Hall
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Arcadia
PROJECT LOCATION: 121 W. Hickory Street, Arcadia, DeSoto County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
No immediate threat indicated.
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $125,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $625,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Window Repairs
Selective demolition
Roof and eave repair
Floor repair and refinishing
Repair ornamental plasterwork
Electrical upgrades
Painting (interior and exterior)
Stucco repairs
Plumbing and bathrooms upgrades
Elevator
HVAC upgrades
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No measureable quantities given in application.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
Applicant has indicated Architect/Engineering fees will be paid from a separate funding sourceother than the Grant budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 23 Preserving Historic Ornamental Plaster
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Delete line item #10. "Elevator" as non-allowable per the Grant guidelines.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Delete line item "Elevator" at a cost of $50,000.00 as a non-allowable grant expenditure.
Reduce grant funding = $450,000.00
Maintain cash match = $125,000.00
Total Project Budget = $575,000.00
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 43
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.067
TITLE: The Mansion at Tuckahoe – Seawall Replacement
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Martin County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 1921 NE Tuckahoe Drive, Jensen Beach, Martin County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural stabilization
Material degradation
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $431,288.00
Match Amount: $431,288.00
Total Budget Amount: $862,576.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Removal of existing boardwalk
Construction of new seawall
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated Architect/Engineering fees will be paid from a separate funding source
other than the Grant budget.
Contractor services have been accounted for within the Project Scope of Work and Project Budget
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
None
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 44
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.008
TITLE: Town Of Lake Park Town Hall Waterproofing And Roof Replacement
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Town of Lake Park
PROJECT LOCATION: 535 Park Avenue, Lake Park, Palm Beach County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Roof failure
Water / Moisture infiltration
Mold Infiltration
Exterior material degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $325,000.00
Match Amount: $326,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $651,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Request for Proposal (RFP) packet preparation, project management
Design documents
New roof
Painting/Waterproofing
In-house project supervision/management
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Provide documentation for exterior waterproofing.
Pressure washing shall be in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards andGuidelines.
Contractor's "means and methods" shall be in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior'sStandards and Guidelines.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 7 – Inappropriate chemical or physical treatment of historic material(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 1 Assessing Cleaning and Water-Repellent Treatments for HistoricMasonry Building
Preservation Brief 6 Dangers of Abrasive Cleaning to Historic Buildings
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 30 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Clay Tile Roofs
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 45
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.097
TITLE: Historic Woman's Club of Boynton Beach (HWCBB) Historical Renovation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
PROJECT LOCATION: 1010 S. Federal Highway, Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture infiltration
Exterior material degradation
Inappropriate construction methods
Mold Infiltration
Wood rot
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $400,000.00
Match Amount: $403,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $803,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Land Planning Services and Historic Preservation Board Application (CRA Assistant Director)
Structural Engineering Feasibility Study and Design Fee (2nd Floor)
Project Management (CRA Assistant Director)
Architectural Design Fee
Windows and Doors Restoration or Replacement
Bathroom Upgrades
2nd Floor Stabilization
Building Lighting
Historic Stage Curtain Restoration and Wall Sign Replacement
Stucco Repairs, Repainting, Refinish Cypress Paneling
ADA Ramp
Contractor's Fee
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
"Land Planning Services and Historic Preservation Board Application" (CRA Assist. Director)
Prioritize building envelope restoration and structural stabilization before any interior work isto be started.
Note: All new window replacements shall be submitted to the Bureau of Historic Preservation,Architectural Preservation Services via the Grants Section for review and approval before anywindow replacement work commences.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional MPE Engineering services are required for this project.
Professional contractor with documented historic preservation experience required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 22 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Stucco
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
Preservation Brief 40 Preserving Historic Ceramic Tile Floors
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional Engineering services.
Delete "Land Planning Services and Historic Preservation Board Application" from the Scopeof Work as a non-allowable line item.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional Engineering fees.
Delete line item "Land Planning Services and Historic Preservation Board Application" as a non-allowable grant expenditure = $13,000.00.
Reduce Grant award = $390,000.00
Retain Match amount = $350,000.00
Reduce In-kind match amount = $40,000.00
This reallocation of funding will result in a reduction of the Grant funding and In-kind match to meetthe required 1 to 1 match by the applicant as per the Grant guidelines.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 46
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.058
TITLE: Goodbread Grocery Rehabilitation
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Bonita Springs
PROJECT LOCATION: 27300 Old 41, Bonita Springs, Lee County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural instability (Above Grade)
Roof failure
Interior finish degradation
Delayed maintenance
Demolition by neglect
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $200,000.00
Match Amount: $200,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $400,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architectural/Design/Construction Plans
Roof Replacement
New replacement window/doors (wooden)
Electric
Exterior stucco repair, building stabilization and painting
Bathroom/Plumbing
HVAC/Mechanical
Interior improvements - framing, paint, drywall, trim work, new flooring
Flood proofing/protection
Portico reconstruction
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Line item #10: Portico reconstruction. Proper documentation needs to be provided beforereconstruction efforts begin. A determination cannot be made from the information supplied as to anaccurate historical reconstruction or appropriate construction details.
Line item #9: Flood proofing/protection appears to be a non-eligible grant expenditure.
Note: All new window replacements shall be submitted to the Bureau of Historic Preservation,Architectural Preservation Services via the Grants Section for review and approval before anywindow replacement work commences.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Contractor services are required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 2 – Removal of character defining feature(s) or space(s)
Standard 3 – Create a false sense of historical development or adding conjectural feature(s)
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 9 – Incompatible new addition(s), exterior alteration(s), or related new constructiondestroying historic materials
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 17 Architectural Character—Identifying the Visual Aspects of HistoricBuildings
Preservation Brief 22 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Stucco
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional contractor services.
Remove line item "Flood proofing/protection"
Remove line item "Portico"
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional contractor fees.
Remove line item "Flood proofing/protection" = $69,000.00 (Grant Funds of $34,500.00 and CashMatch of $34,500.00)
Remove line item "Portico" = $64,000.00 (Grant Funds of $32,000.00 and Cash Match of$32,000.00)
Reduce Grant funding = $133,500.00
Reduce Cash Match = $133,500.00
Total Project Budget = $267,000.00
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 47
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.122
TITLE: Old Hendry County Courthouse Interior Restoration, Phase I
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Hendry County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 25 E. Hickpochee Avenue, LaBelle, Hendry County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
Water / Moisture intrusion
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $125,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $625,000.00
REDI
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architect & Engineering Services
Haz. Mat Survey, Abatement, Demolition of non-historic elements; Repairs to Ceiling Joists
HVAC & Electrical
Grant Administration
Construction Management Contract
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering / Contractor services are required and have been includedin the project scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 7 – Inappropriate chemical or physical treatment of historic material(s) - the use of sprayfoam insulation.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 48
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.014
TITLE: Historic Hampton House Build-Out Phase IV
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: The Historic Hampton House Community Trust, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 4240 NW 27th Avenue, Miami, Miami-Dade County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
No immediate threat indicated.
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $535,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,035,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
HVAC installation
Fire protection
Electrical installation
Light fixtures
Interior construction
A/E fees
Project management
Contractor's fees
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
Professional contractor services are required for this project and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 3 – Create a false sense of historical development or adding conjectural feature(s)
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
Preservation Brief 24 Heating, Ventilating, and Cooling Historic Buildings—Problems andRecommended Approaches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 49
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.026
TITLE: Rehabilitation of the Gondola Building, Biltmore Hotel
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Coral Gables, Historical Resources & Cultural ArtsDepartment
PROJECT LOCATION: 1200 Anastasia Avenue, Coral Gables, Miami-Dade County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Delayed maintenance
Interior finish degradation
Exterior material degradation
Water / Moisture intrusion
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $500,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,000,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
General Requirements and Survey
Plans and Specifications
Geotechnical Engineering Services
Threshold/Special Inspections
Construction Manager Pre-Construction Services
New Plumbing and Electrical lines to building
General Construction Costs
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Excessive Professional Services Fees (Architectural). DMS fee curve indicates $88,784.00 isappropriate fee for the proposed project budget.
"General site restoration and repair", this is embedded in the Project Budget and should beremoved.
"Site infrastructure" shall be limited to 5 feet from the outside face of the exterior walls.
Excessive square footage cost = $881.00 s.f.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering and Contracting services are required and have beenincluded in the project scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 1 Assessing Cleaning and Water-Repellent Treatments for HistoricMasonry Buildings
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 22 The Preservation and Repair of Historic Stucco
Preservation Brief 42 The Maintenance, Repair and Replacement of Historic Cast Stone
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
The Scope of Work appears to be in accordance to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards andGuidelines however, the project budget cannot be verified with the Scope of Work as submitted as itincludes non-allowable grant line items as well as excessive square footage and professionalservices costs.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
As submitted the project budget cannot be verified in accordance per the submitted Scope of Workdue to the inclusion of non-allowable grant expenditures.
Revise Construction Budget to reflect work being done as well as professional services accordingto the DMS fees curve. These fees are based on the proposed Project Budget and should be revisedonce an accurate Project Budget has been proposed.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 50
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.073
TITLE: Star Island Water Tower Restoration
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Miami Beach
PROJECT LOCATION: Buoy Park on Star Island, Miami Beach, Miami-Dade County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
None
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Exterior finish degradation
Exterior material degradation
Water / Moisture infiltration
Structural failure / Instability (Above Grade)
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $350,000.00
Match Amount: $350,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $700,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architecture & Engineering Fees
Repairs to water features
Cupola repairs
Shaft repairs
Repairs to tower base
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated contractor fees are included in line items within the total Scope of Work.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 15 Preservation of Historic Concrete
Preservation Brief 39 Holding the Line - Controlling Unwanted Moisture in HistoricBuildings
Preservation Brief 50 Lightning Protection for Historic Structures
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 51
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.086
TITLE: 2019 Miami Marine Stadium Development Project
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: City of Miami
PROJECT LOCATION: 3501 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Miami-Dade County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Structural deterioration
Vandalism / Security issues
Exposure to natural elements
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $2,181,381.00
Total Budget Amount: $2,681,381.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Selective demolition of the lower foundation plan
Repairs of lower foundation plan
Concrete in place with forms and reinforcing of lower foundation plan
Pour structural concrete for beams
New concrete slabs overwater
Reinforce existing seawall
4 inch shotcrete overlay with reinforcing to existing seawall
City of Miami Office of Capital Improvements administration, project management andconstruction management fees (cash match)
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated contractor fees are included in line items within the total Scope of Work.
This is an ongoing project, Professional Architectural/Engineering services have been verified andaccounted for in previous phases.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 7 – Inappropriate chemical or physical treatment of historic material(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 15 Preservation of Historic Concrete
Preservation Brief 17 Architectural Character—Identifying the Visual Aspects of HistoricBuildings
Preservation Brief 32 Making Historic Properties Accessible
Preservation Brief 38 Removing Graffiti from Historic Masonry
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 52
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.096
TITLE: OLCDC Historic Hurt Building
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Opa-locka Community Development Corporation, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 490 Opa Locka Blvd, Opa-Locka, Miami-Dade County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Wood rot
Structural degradation of balcony
Water / Moisture infiltration
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $131,000.00
Match Amount: $131,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $262,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Second Floor Balcony Roofing Framing
Second Floor Balcony Roof membrane, flashing and roof drains
Wood Barn Door Restoration
Upper Roof Area and Main Dome Repairs
Second Story Windows
Exterior Painting
Plans (Windows and Roof)
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Replacement window submittals.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
The City will fund the Architectural/Engineering fees from a separate funding source.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
All new window replacements shall be submitted to the Bureau of Historic Preservation,Architectural Preservation Services via the Grants Section for review and approval before anywindow replacement work commences. Staff does not know what window product was proposed in2009.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 53
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.120
TITLE: Pinecrest Gardens Site Protection
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Village of Pinecrest
PROJECT LOCATION: 11000 Red Road, Pinecrest, Miami-Dade County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Individual Local Designation
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture intrusion
Exterior finish degradation
Window degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $500,000.00
Match Amount: $707,170.00
Total Budget Amount: $1,207,170.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Replace Exterior Windows
Replace Exterior Glass Doors
Repair Terrace Elevations and replace mosaic tiles
Fix base and incline of ramp, replace tiles and add handrails
Design (architect/engineering)
Survey
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Current mosaic design should be documented before demolition of either Terrace or ramp. Mosaicdesign is to be replicated during reconstruction of these areas.
Lack of contractor fees and services
Line item "Replace exterior windows"
Note: All new window replacements shall be submitted to the Bureau of Historic Preservation,Architectural Preservation Services via the Grants Section for review and approval before anywindow replacement work commences.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional Architectural / Engineering services are required for this project.
Professional contractor services are required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional contractor services if grant funds are to be used for payment.
Reduce Scope of Work indicating concrete substrate replacement service. If funded, this serviceshould be removed from Scope of Work at the Terrace and ramp locations.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional contractor fees if grant funds are to be used for payment.
Reduce Project Budget indicating concrete substrate replacement costs. If funded, this cost shouldbe removed from Project Budget at the Terrace and ramp locations.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 54
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.005
TITLE: Hurricane repairs and protection for the Historic Key West Armory
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Historic Florida Keys Foundation
PROJECT LOCATION: 600 White Street, Key West, Monroe County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture Infiltration
Window degradation
Interior finish degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $47,000.00
Match Amount: $47,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $94,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Rebuild 11 windows
Hurricane protection 48 openings
Exit door replacement
Aluminum fence repair
Ceiling and wall repair and painting
Re-glazing of other windows as required
Architectural Services
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Professional window conservator services are required for this project and have not been includedin Scope of Work.
No response to Request for Information dated 6/7/2019.
Project overlap exists with a grant application submitted for a Hurricane Irma NPS Subgrant. If theHurricane Irma NPS Subgrant is funded, these items must be removed from the current scope ofwork and budget or the Special Category grant application must be withdrawn.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional window conservator services are required for this project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Scope of Work as follows:
Allow for professional conservator services if grant funds are to be used for payment.
Remove "Fence repair" from Scope of Work as a non-allowable Grant expenditure.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
Adjust Budget as follows:
Allow for professional window conservator fees if grant funds are to be used for payment.
Remove "Fence repair" from Project Budget as a non-allowable grant expenditure = $4,000.00.Staff recommendation is to divide the difference between the Grant Funds and the Cash Match whichwould equal:
Grant Fund staff recommendation = $45,000.00
Cash Match staff recommendation = $45,000.00
Total Project Budget = $90,000.00
This reallocation of funding will result in a reduction of the Grant funding and Cash match to meetthe required 1 to 1 match by the applicant as per the Grant guidelines.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 55
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.017
TITLE: St. Paul's Rectory Restoration and Repair
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: St. Paul's Protestant Episcopal Church of Key West, Florida
PROJECT LOCATION: 415 Duval Street, Key West, Monroe County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Determined Eligible by the National Park Service or Potentially Eligible by the Division
Individual Local Designation
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Roof failure
Water / Moisture infiltration
Wood rot
Interior finish degradation
Delayed maintenance
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $96,323.00
Match Amount: $96,323.00
Total Budget Amount: $192,646.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Restoration of Historic Porch
Restoration of the Roof, soffit & fascia
Repair/Replace Gutter/Downspouts
Front door restoration
Repair Sliding Doors on 1st Floor From Living Room
Door restoration
Repair Cistern Top & Rebuild Deck over the Cistern
Paint Exterior
Replace Failed Apron Lattice
Administrative Costs
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Reconstruction of historic side porch without documentation of the appearance. None supplied inapplication.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has indicated that professional Architectural / Contractor services have been retained forthis project.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standard 5 - Removal of distinctive feature(s), finish(es) or example(s) of craftsmanship
Standard 6 – Unnecessary replacement of historic feature(s) / incompatible replacement(s)
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 9 The Repair of Historic Wooden Windows
Preservation Brief 10 Exterior Paint Problems on Historic Woodwork
Preservation Brief 15 Preservation of Historic Concrete
Preservation Brief 18 Rehabilitating Interiors in Historic Buildings Identifying andPreserving Character Defining Elements
Preservation Brief 21 Repairing Historic Flat Plaster Walls and Ceilings
Preservation Brief 45 Preserving Historic Wood Porches
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 56
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.018
TITLE: Historic Monroe County Courthouse Exterior Masonry Restoration
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
PROJECT LOCATION: 500 Whitehead Street, Key West, Monroe County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
National Register District - Contributing Resources
Individual Local Designation
Local Designated District -Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Exterior material degradation
Water / Moisture Infiltration
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $482,825.00
Match Amount: $482,825.00
Total Budget Amount: $965,650.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Architectural Conservator
Architectural / Engineering Fees
Contractor Fees
Exterior Door Replacement
Historic Brick Replacement
Brick Mortar Repointing
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
Inappropriate past construction methods.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Professional conservator services are required for this project and have been included in the projectscope and budget.
Professional Architectural / Engineering and Contractor services are required and have beenincluded in the project scope and budget.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
Specific Preservation Briefs to be called out as recommended information to consider:
Preservation Brief 1 Assessing Cleaning and Water-Repellent Treatments for HistoricMasonry Buildings
Preservation Brief 2 Repointing Mortar Joints in Historic Masonry Buildings
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.
SPECIAL CATEGORY STAFF REVIEW
REVIEW ORDER NUMBER: 57
APPLICATION NUMBER: 21.h.sc.100.048
TITLE: Little White House Paint and Exterior Restoration
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION: Key West Harry S Truman Foundation, Inc.
PROJECT LOCATION: 111 Front Street, Key West, Monroe County
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Historical designation indicated includes:
Individual National Register Listing(s)
National Register District - Contributing Resources
THREAT / ENDANGERMENT
Threats indicated include:
Water / Moisture infiltration
Exterior finish degradation
FUNDING:
Requested Amount: $45,000.00
Match Amount: $45,000.00
Total Budget Amount: $90,000.00
PROJECT TYPE: Development Project
PROJECT SCOPE:
Exterior Painting to protect against water intrusion
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
No concerns or issues at this time.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT:
Applicant has allowed for professional Architectural / Engineering oversight services for thisproject.
STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:
Standards Compliance - None.
SCOPE ASSESSMENT:
No proposed scope of work adjustments are recommended.
BUDGET ASSESSMENT:
No proposed budget or funding adjustments are recommended.