spatial vision project team wildfire project user workshop round 2 – spatial products jo...

Spatial Vision Project Team

Wildfire Project

User Workshop

Round 2 – Spatial ProductsJo Cannington – Beca Anne Batrouney – BecaStephen Farrell – Spatial Vision

Thursday 2 November 2006


What is the Purpose of this Workshop?

Update potential users on progress

Present project outputs

Seek feedback on framework developed, and proposed project trial


Today’s Agenda 1. Welcome

2. Project Summary

3. Project Update and Review of Key Issues

4. Project Outputs

5. Morning tea

6. Trial of Project Framework

7. Next Steps


What are the Wildfire Project Objectives?

To develop:

A methodology to evaluate the potential consequences of wildfire on assets throughout Victoria.

State wide wildfire consequence map and datasets presented in a uniform and accessible format that supports integrated wildfire planning and decision making


Project Scope – Consequence of Loss

Project Focus


Project Outputs – Users and Processes


Key Concepts -Methodology Overview


What Consultation has been undertaken?

Project Management Team (9 meetings)

Expert Panel Workshops (4 Meetings)

Stakeholder User Consultation (4 Round 1 Workshops – Melbourne, Benalla, Horsham, Bairnsdale)

Web-site, project updates, information sheets

Co-ordination with IMFMP Project and CRC Independent Technical Advisor/Interested

Parties review - DoI and BoM


Example Output – State wide Map Data Views


Questions?


Key ConceptsAsset Classification

Consequence of Loss

Disruption

Spatial Reporting Unit


Key Concept - Asset Classification

Key levels:

10 Asset Classes

170+ Asset Categories

Asset Groups:

Environmental

Economic

Social

Differentiated on basis of assigning either:

Value, or

Disruption implications


Key Concept – Consequence of Loss

Consequence = DAMAGE + DISRUPTION

DAMAGE = total loss of value (replacement or intrinsic)

DISRUPTION = impact from the loss of an asset (based on service

and/or function it performs)


Key Concept – Disruption Elements

Impact on services and/or functions performed by asset


Progress Since Last Workshops?

Synthesis of Round 1 Consultation Information

Prepared Methodology

Assigned Values

Assigned Disruption Element Ratings

Developed Initial Spatial Products to Implement


Spatial Product Generation

Consequence of Loss generated for Asset Categories and 8 Asset Classes

CoL also generated for 2 proposed versions of Asset Classes

Findings Report prepared

Used 173 Asset Categories in total


Round 1 User Workshops

Four workshops were held: Melbourne – 30 May 2006 Benalla – 1 June 2006 Horsham – 6 June 2006 Bairnsdale – 8 June 2006

Good representation from each Agency Differences in each region – 4 Workshop

locations Limited representation from across the State-

most travelled within 1-2 hour of venue Examples worked well


Key Issues arising from consultation

Inclusion of proposed developments and projections (eg. population estimates, new infrastructure)

Disruption independent of damage (service of function performed can be lost without damage to asset)

Tighten terminology concerning planning levels (use of term ‘local’)

Need to retain integrity of Statewide view, but allow ‘user’ to assign value and disruption at local level

Different number of disruption elements in Asset Groups may lead to bias

Disruption must be assigned by ‘user’


Key Issues Outcome - Scope


Key Issues Outcome – Disruption

Disruption is the impact over time ascribed to an asset category due to the loss of a physical asset or the service it provides.


Key Issues Outcome – Spatial Reporting Unit

For planning purposes need to aggregate and summarise information


Key Issues Outcome – Asset Categories

Biodiversity Land Water Air Cultural Heritage Social Infrastructure Human Life Economic Production Infrastructure Property

Asset Classification Definitions3 Tiered Asset Classification

Environmental

Social

Economic

Triple Bottom Line Asset Classes(Reporting Level)

Asset Categories(Data Analysis/Collation)

Implemented 29 Nil 2 Nil 12 40 10 24 37 19

173


Key Issues Outcome – Value and Disruption


Questions?


Project Outputs

Spatial Datasets and Tables Prepared and provided on DVD

Map Representation of Data show result of initial application CD containing State and LGA results prepared

Findings Report prepared


Project Outputs

Asset Class Summary datasets

Asset Category Databases

Asset Class Component Feature Datasets

Raw Feature Databases

Reportingarea

summarydata

Featuredata

main

associated


Inputs Spatial Datasets - Assets as Features


Project Outputs – Consequence of Loss Data


Project Outputs

Maps Desktop GIS Corporate GIS (eg. DSE Metashare)


Project Outputs - Learnings

What was learnt Data Representation Polygon data representation (use of weights) Dataset coverage Data volumes


Findings – Polygon Representation


Derived Data - Human Life – Res. Pop. (ABS & Building density)


New Data - Econ. Production – Agricultural Production


Data Product Demo

Information Package

Spatial Links / Query

Data Representation

Weighting – Asset Category Significance

Context – integration with other data


Map Representation CD

Review of maps and CDs


Questions?


Project Trial Scope

Integral component of product development

Target participants – planning forums at various levels

Integration with other related projects Evaluate accessibility, applicability,

relevance and reliability of products Consider ongoing data management Commence March 2007


Aim

Ensure that Wildfire Project final products

can contribute to integrated strategic wildfire

planning and decision making


Objectives

To confirm that the methodology and spatial products meet user needs and are fit for purpose, prior to their formal release

To explore the potential contribution of wildfire products to concurrent projects e.g. IMFMP, Bushfire CRC and DSE/SII – PEMS

To assess the validity and reliability of the wildfire methodology and the sensitivity and accessibility of information presented as spatial products


Methodology

Representation of the assets as features, categories, classes and groups

Quantification and valuation of assets Validity – methodological assumptions Reliability User interactivity


Spatial Products

Datasets Sensitivity – spatial representation Representation and format Resolution User accessibility Business rules for planning at different levels Application for the delivery of interactive

products Delivery platform - desk top, web interface

etc.


Feedback for the Trial – Target Groups

GIS User Groups

Integrated Planning (IMFMP) Planners

Community Safety Officers

Integration with other Groups eg. Bushfire CRC

Different Geographic Locations and Scale State

Regional

Local

General


Governance

Project Board Project Management Team GIS Technical Project Team


For further information

http://www.spatialvision.com.au

Brian HineManager, Major ProjectOffice of Emergency Services CommissionerLevel 23, 121 Exhibition StreetMelbourne VIC 3000

phone: 03 8684 7920mobile: 0439 366 238email: [email protected]


Questions?

spatial vision project team wildfire project user workshop round 2 – spatial products jo...

Documents

imfmp project

project summary

project management team

project updates

asset slide

proposed project trial

wildfire project objectives

trial of project framework