southern pine based biorefinery centerbiorefinery … pine based biorefinery centerbiorefinery...
TRANSCRIPT
Southern Pine Based Biorefinery CenterBiorefinery Center
Art J. RagauskasInstitute of Paper Science and Technology
School of Chemistry and BiochemistryGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
1
Project Overview• Technical hurdle to be
overcome?– Optimal material science for
pyrolysis and pretreatment reactors
– Viable generation ofViable generation of green/biodiesel
– Optimized bioethanol generation integrated with pulp/paper/modified cellulosics pathways
– Integration into a modern SW kraft pulp mill operationkraft pulp mill operation
2
Quad Chart Overview
• Project start date • Research studies have been initiatedTimeline Project Development
j– Oct. 1, 2010
• Project end date
Research studies have been initiated and on track
• Project Scope is following program deliverables
– Sept. 30, 2012
• Percent complete: 12%• Completion of deliverables projected
for Sept/30/2012.
Project ParticipantsCo-PI: Dr. P. Singh, MSE/GTIndustrial kick-off meeting
Project managed by deliverables
Initial testing facilities been ordered
3
g
Exploratory research studies on pine conversion technologies initiated
Approach• Develop on the GA Tech campus an integrated southern pine wood to
biofuels/biomaterials processing facility that will test advanced integrated wood processing exploratory technologies at the benchintegrated wood processing exploratory technologies at the bench scale.
Exploratory research program is structured to evaluate key chemical/enzymatic conversion processes needed to convert southern pine to biofuels and novel biomaterials in a pulp millpine to biofuels and novel biomaterials in a pulp mill.
Research program is task/milestone orientated Focus on Process Chemistry of Conversion & Material
4 4
Focus on Process Chemistry of Conversion & Material Science of Conversion Reactors
Technical Accomplishments/ pProgress/Results
Tasks Completedp
• Task A: Collect GA pine woodchips, residues and bark – Feedstock for laboratory studies for next duration of two year projectFeedstock for laboratory studies for next duration of two year project
• Task A.1: Determine biomass constituents
% ComponentPine wood
chipsPine wood
barkPine wood residues% Component chips bark residues
Holocellulose 68.5 50.9 65.9α-cellulose 45.4 29.3 42.1hemicellulose 12.2 13.7 12.5
Lignin 28.0 46.3 30.4acid insoluble lignin 27.3 45.5 29.4acid soluble lignin 0.69 0.81 1.02
-Basics constituents info needed for all studies
5
Ash 0.27 0.91 0.81
Extractives in DCM 2.5 3.6 1.5Tannin − 11.6 −
stud es
Technical Accomplishments/ pProgress/Results
• Task A.2: Structural analysis of pine - ongoing
Cellulose
C1
C6C4
Crystallinity & DP – key parameter forenzymatic deconstructionC2,3,5enzymatic deconstructionof cellulose for bioethanol
Data needed for upgradingLignin
Data needed for upgradingLignin studies for Green Diesel/biodiesel
6102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200
f1 (ppm)
1313413513613713813914014114214314414514614714814950f1 (ppm)
Technical Accomplishments/ pProgress/Results
• Task A.2: Structural analysis of pine - ongoing
St t l tTannins
Structural components mycontribute to corrosion &inhibit biofuel productionby biological routeby biological route
7
Technical Accomplishments/ pProgress/Results
• Task C.2: Microbial upgrading lignin and pyrolysis oil from pine pg g g py y presidue - ongoing
Single cell oils produced by heterotrophic microorganisms
TAG
Oleaginous species under growth restricting conditions (high C:N ratio) are capable to produce large quantities of TAG.Using agricultural wastes to grow two high yielding strains Rhodococcus opacus
8 8
g g g g y g pPD630 and Gordonia sp DG, the latter can produce TAGs up to 14.45 mg L-1 d-1 on orange waste while earlier converted carob waste with 59.27 mg L-1 d-1 productivity
Technical Accomplishments/ Progress/ResultsProgress/Results
• Task C.2: Microbial upgrading lignin and pyrolysis oil from pine residue - ongoing
DSM 1069 - OD [600]
3.0
residue ongoingMicrooragnisms Under Study1.Rhodococcus opacus DSM 1069 (DSM 1069)2.Rhodococcus opacus PD 630 (PD 630)
2.0
2.5
1.0
1.5
OD
[600
]
0.0
0.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000 50 100 150 200 250 300
hours
Glucose PHA VanA UE Gluc-0.5 VanA-0.5 UE-0.5
9 9p-hydroxy benzoate Na+ salt (PHA); 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzoate (vanillic acid) (VanA)Ultrasonicated lignin (UE)
R. opacus DSM 1069 growth on different substrates as measured by optical density (OD) at 600 nm.
Technical Accomplishments/ pProgress/Results
• Task C.2: Microbial upgrading lignin and pyrolysis oil from pine residue - ongoing
PD 630 - OD [600]
residue ongoingMicrooragnisms Under Study1.Rhodococcus opacus DSM 1069 (DSM 1069)2.Rhodococcus opacus PD 630 (PD 630)
2.5
3.0
3.5
1.5
2.0
OD
[600
]
0.0
0.5
1.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
hours
Glucose PHA VanA UE Gluc-0.5 VanA-0.5 UE-0.5
10
Both strains are growing on lignin like structuresNeed determine TAG production, my require reduction in lignin DP
Technical Accomplishments/ pProgress/Results
• Task C.GN.2 Pine residue and bark pyrolysis - ongoing
Pine residue pyrolyzed at 550 oC with 0.5 L/min nitrogen flow into the tubeg
Pyrolysis oil 45%Char 40%Non-condensable: 15%
Structure characterization ongoing
Examining role of lignin in pyrolysisExamining role of lignin in pyrolysis
Lignin yields a light/heavy oilP f d t 550 600 C
11
Preferred temp 550-600 oC
Technical Accomplishments/ Progress/ResultsProgress/Results
• Task C.GN.2 Pine residue and bark pyrolysis - ongoing
Light oil is primarily waterChange in pyrolysis temp increases catechols & reduces aliphatic hydroxyls
12 12
Technical Accomplishments/ Progress/ResultsProgress/Results
• Task C.GN.2 Pine residue and bark pyrolysis - ongoing
350400
Heavy Oils
200250300350
Mn(g/mol)
50100150200
Mw(g/mol)
050
400 500 600 700 Ongoing Studies:Improved reactor designCatalysis pyrolysis reactions
13 13
Technical Accomplishments pProgress/Results
• Task D 2: Cellulosic derivatives ongoing• Task D.2: Cellulosic derivatives – ongoingObjective: Develop new high-valued cellulosic co-products based on cellulosic
whiskers
14 14
Technical Accomplishments pProgress/Results
• Task D 2: Cellulosic derivatives ongoing• Task D.2: Cellulosic derivatives – ongoingObjective: Develop new high-valued cellulosic co-products based on cellulosic
whiskers
a b
AFM image of 0.5 wt% suspensions (a)
0 2μm 0 2μm
dc
whisker (b) DAC (c) DAC-MA (d) DAC-BA
- Testing physical properties- Testing physical properties - Composite applications
15
0 2μm 0 2μm
BESC A lti i tit ti l DOE f d d tBioEnergy Science CenterBESC: A multi-institutional DOE-funded center dedicated to understanding and modifying plant biomass recalcitrance
Oak Ridge Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation Oak Ridge National Laboratory
University of GeorgiaUniversity of Tennessee
Samuel Roberts Noble FoundationNational RenewableEnergy LaboratoryBrookhaven National University of Tennessee
Dartmouth CollegeGeorgia Institute of Technology
Brookhaven NationalLaboratoryUniversity of California–Riverside Cornell University West Virginia University
ArborGen, LLCCeres, Incorporated
Cornell University Washington State UniversityUniversity of Minnesota
322 people in 20 institutions
Mascoma CorporationVerenium Corporation
North Carolina State UniversityVirginia Polytechnic InstituteU i it f C lif i L A l
18
University of California–Los Angeles
Access to the sugars in lignocellulosic biomassin lignocellulosic biomass is the current critical barrier
• Overcoming this barrier
Butanol
Alcohols
Consolidatedbioprocessing
Hydrocarbons
will cut processing costs significantly and be used
Conventionalenzyme fermentation
Ethanol Fermentation Chemicalcatalysis
Syntheticbiology
Hydrocarbons
be used in most conversion processes
enzyme fermentation
• This requires an integrated multidisciplinary
Recalcitrance Time frame Planned ActualModified plants to field trials Year 5 Year 4
multidisciplinary approachNew or improved
microbes to development
Year 4–5 Year 3–4
19
Analysis and screening technologies
Year 3 on
Year 2 on
Comparative impacts of R&Dp pon biomass processing cost
A1 I h d l i i ldA1: Increase hydrolysis yield
A2: Halve cellulase loading
A3: Eliminate pretreatment
A: Conversion of biomassinto available sugars
A3: Eliminate pretreatment
A4: Consolidate bioprocessing
B1: Simultaneous C5 and C6 use
B2: Increased fermentation yield B: Conversion ofsugars into biofuels
B3: Increased ethanol titer
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70% of processing cost reduction
Without overcoming biomass recalcitrance (A), cellulosic biofuels will be more expensive than corn biofuels Improved sugar conversion (B) is not enough
21
expensive than corn biofuels. Improved sugar conversion (B) is not enough.Ref: Lynd, L.R., M.S. Laser, D. Bransby, B.E. Dale, B. Davison, R. Hamilton, M. Himmel, M. Keller, J.D. McMillan, J. Sheehan, C.E. Wyman, "How Biotech can transform biofuels," Nature Biotechnology 26:169-172 (2008)
Targeted cell wall synthesis approach:• Test known putative recalcitrance genes in via
Populus and switchgrass transgenics (TP)• Basic research to identify unknown genes and
decipher how they effect recalcitrance
Discovery-based natural variation approach:• Identify natural variation in recalcitrance• Identify gene responsible • Test via Populus and switchgrass transgenics (TP)Test via Populus and switchgrass transgenics (TP) • Activation tagging
23
HTP Characterization Pipeline for the Recalcitrance Phenotypefor the Recalcitrance Phenotype
S i f 1000’ f l• Screening of 1000’s of samplesPre-treatment
th d ithComposition analytical
pyrolysis IR confirmed byEnzyme digestibility
lnew method with dilute acid and steam
pyrolysis, IR, confirmed by wet chemistry
sugar release with enzyme cocktail
24Detailed chemical and structural analyses of specific samples
Mining Variation to Identify Key Genes in Biomass Composition and Sugar Release
HTS PipelineCollected ~1300 samples for HTS Pipeline
Skagit (Sedro Woolle )
Collected 1300 samples for Populus Association and
Activation-tag Study
Sugar Release Assay
Analytical Pyrolysis
Skagit (Sedro-Woolley)
Skykomish (Monroe)
Puyallup (Orting)Columbia (Longview)
Cell Wall Biosynthesis
Database
Create Genetic Marker Map to identify allelic variation
Identify Marker Trait Association100 mi
Existing collections (N = 500; 1-12 trees/site)
New collections (N = 580; 140-160 trees/site)
Existing collections (N = 500; 1-12 trees/site)
New collections (N = 580; 140-160 trees/site)
Establish common d f i ti
Trait Association200 km
gardens for association and activation tag
populations with 1000s of plants
25
Association Study Association Study ––Composition DataComposition DataComposition DataComposition Data
•The association samplesThe association samples display extreme variation in lignin, S/G ratio, and sugar 80g , , gcontent
•Extreme phenotypes have 30
40
50
60
70
Cou
nt
Extreme phenotypes have been characterized for detailed pretreatment and
0
10
20
1.00
1.17
1.35
1.52
1.69
1.87
2.04
2.21
2.39
2.56
2.73
2.90
S/G ratiop
sugar release assays•All sampled genotypes are
S/G ratio
2 5
3.0
3.5
being replicated and will be established in a common garden experiment 1 0
1.5
2.0
2.5
S/G
Rat
io
26
garden experiment0.5
1.0
15.00 17.00 19.00 21.00 23.00 25.00 27.00 29.00
Lignin (%)
Populus Association Study0.8
mas
s]
Populus Association Study• Tested for enhanced sugar release
characteristics through pretreatment and
0.6
gar /
g b
iom
characteristics through pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis
– Hot water pretreatments at 160 and 180oC
0.4
0.2yiel
d [g
sug
• HTP pretreatment and co-hydrolysis in 96 well-plates
• Preliminary observations:0.0su
gar
30252015
li i t t [%]
0.8
iom
ass]
Preliminary observations:– Sugar yield increases with S/G ratio– Lignin content has minimal effect
S tli l l hibit
lignin content [%]
0.6
0.4suga
r / g
b – Some outlier poplar samples exhibit very high sugar release
• Characterization pipeline works
0.2
gar y
ield
[g
Pretreatment conditions: 180oC, 18Min160oC, 68Min
Standard BESC poplar
27
0.0sug
3.02.01.0
lignin S/G ratio [-]
Standard BESC poplarTheoretical sugar yield
Studer, Wyman et al.
Genetic block in lignin biosynthesis in switchgrass increases biofuel yieldsPhenylalanine PAL
HOOC
cinnamate LigninAgrobacterium-
mediated Ethanol yield
in switchgrass increases biofuel yields
R- OCoAS
HOOC OH
4-coumaric acid
C4H
4CL
Ligninpathwaytransformation
of switchgrass
Ethanol yield
0.25
0.30
0.35
Wei
ght
g/g)
O
HOH
R OOH
4-coumaroylshikimic acidor quinic acid
OOH
O
CoASOH
4-coumaroyl CoA HCT
C3HCCR
0 10
0.15
0.20
ol Y
ield
per
WB
iom
ass
(g
4-coumaraldehyde
HOH2C OH
4-coumaroyl alcohol
O
R- OOH
caffeoylshikimic acidor quinic acid
HCT
CAD
0.00
0.05
0.10
Wild-type
Eth
ano of
Noble
CoASOCH3
H lignin O
CoASOH
OH
caffeoyl CoA
CCoAOMT G ligninOCH3
switchgrass Foundation transgenic
switchgrass
feruloyl CoAO
CoASOH
HOH
OCH3
OCH3
coniferyl alcohol
OHHOH2C
CAD 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol
OCH3
OH
OH
HOH2C
OCH
F5HCCRCOMT
COMT
29
coniferaldehydeO
OH
5-hydroxyconiferaldehyde
O
HOH
OCH3
OHsinapaldehyde
O
HOH
OCH3
CH3O sinapyl alcohol
OCH3
OH
OCH3
HOH2C S ligninF5H CAD
The Samuel Roberts
NOBLEFoundation
COMT
29See Fu, C.; Mielenz, J.R.; Xiao, X.; Ge, Y.; Hamilton, C.Y.; Rodriguez Jr. M.; Chen, F.; Foston, M.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Bouton, J.; Dixon, R.A.; Yu, Z.; Wang, Z.Y. PNAS, DOI; 10.1073
Understanding the Structure/Function of the Cellulosome - CbhA is a Critical Enzymey
C. thermocellum CbhA
DockerinCBM3b
Bayer et al 2009CBM4
Fn3 Fn3PDB
New structures solved at NREL
Bayer et al. 2009(unpublished)NREL 2009 Fn31- Fn32
NREL 2009Ig-GH9
PDB
New structures solved at NREL
A bl d 7 d i
30 30Assembled 7 domain enzyme• Ready for computer simulations
New tools from “Systems Biology” offer confidence for conversion successconfidence for conversion success
250
kDa Run 1Run 2
250
kDa Run 1Run 2
Shot-gun Proteomic LC-MS/MS IdentificationAffinity Purification
400
500
(mg/
L)
Fermentation
Metabolic Labeling Quantitation
3750
75100150
3750
75100150
0
100
200
300
Pelle
t Pro
tein
(
0 5
1.0
1.5
2.0Log2(Switchgrass/Cellulose)Log2(Cellobiose/Cellulose)
0 5
1.0
1.5
2.0Log2(Switchgrass/Cellulose)Log2(Cellobiose/Cellulose)
10152025
10152025
00 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (h)
80
120
160
Prot
ein
(mg/
L)
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
CelSCelACthe0CelKCelQ
CelRXynDXynZ
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
CelSCelACthe0CelKCelQ
CelRXynDXynZ
0
40
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Time (h)
Supe
rnat
e
• C thermocellum alters its cellulosome
-2.0
-1.5
S (GH48)A (GH8)e0821 (GH5)K (GH9)Q (GH9)R (GH9)D (GH10)Z (GH10)-2.0
-1.5
S (GH48)A (GH8)e0821 (GH5)K (GH9)Q (GH9)R (GH9)D (GH10)Z (GH10)
Time (h)
• Pretreated Switchgrass• Cellobiose• Amorphous Cellulose• Avicel - 14N
• C. thermocellum alters its cellulosome catalytic composition depending upon the growth biomass substrate
• We identified and experimentally verified Avicel N• Avicel - 15N • Avicel-Pectin• Avicel-Xylan• Avicel-Pectin-Xylan
16 “new” cellulosome components
31Citation: “Raman B, et al. (2009) Impact of Pretreated Switchgrass and Biomass Carbohydrates on Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 Cellulosome Composition: A Quantitative Proteomic Analysis. PLoS ONE 4(4): e5271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005271”