source water protection division of drinking and ground waters
DESCRIPTION
Source Water Protection What we will cover: Background (What, Why, How) What Ohio EPA is doing What you can do nowTRANSCRIPT
Source Water Protection Division of Drinking and Ground
Waters
Program Richard Kroeger & Pam Nixon OAWWA - NE Summer Meeting
August 20, 2015 Division of Drinking and Ground Waters Source Water
Protection
What we will cover: Background (What, Why, How) What Ohio EPA is
doing What you can do now What is SWAP? ELEVATOR SPEECH:
Source water protection (SWAP) is protecting the area around a
public water systems wells or intake. The program was created by
the Safe Drinking Drinking Water Act (1986 and 1996) In Ohio, the
SWAP program is administered by Ohio EPAs Division of Drinking and
Ground Waters Background Safe Drinking Water Act was originally
passed by Congress in 1974 to protect public health by regulating
the nation's public drinking water supply. The law was amended in
1986 creating the Wellhead Protection Program Amended again in 1996
and requires many actions to protect drinking water and its
sources: rivers, lakes, reservoirs, springs, and ground water
wells. -Expansion of WHP program to include all PWSs, including
those with a surface water source -Part of the multiple barrier
approach to protection of public health -Catalyzed by contamination
events (Milwaukee, Canada, crypto examples, Dayton, West Lafayette,
& Columbus chemical examples) -Although only 150 PWSs use a SW
source, over 60% of the population in Ohio get their water from
surface water. Background The 1996 Amendments to the Safe Drinking
Water Act Require Every State to Develop and Implement a Source
Water Assessment and Protection (SWAP) Plan that Includes:
Determining the source area for all public water systems (PWS).
Identifying potential contaminant sources. Determining the
susceptibility of the PWS to contamination. -Expansion of WHP
program to include all PWSs, including those with a surface water
source -Part of the multiple barrier approach to protection of
public health -Catalyzed by contamination events (Milwaukee,
Canada, crypto examples, Dayton, West Lafayette, & Columbus
chemical examples) -Although only 150 PWSs use a SW source, over
60% of the population in Ohio get their water from surface water.
Public Water Systems Currently (August 2015) Ohio has:
4,223 Ground Water Systems (plus 124 systemsthat purchase water
from them) 114 Surface Water Systems (plus 189 systems that
purchase water from them) -Expansion of WHP program to include all
PWSs, including those with a surface water source -Part of the
multiple barrier approach to protection of public health -Catalyzed
by contamination events (Milwaukee, Canada, crypto examples,
Dayton, West Lafayette, & Columbus chemical examples) -Although
only 303 PWSs use a SW source, over 60% of the population in Ohio
get their water from surface water. Source Water Protection
WHAT?
Determine the area to be protected (delineation) Locate potential
sources of contamination (inventory) Decide protective strategies
(protection plan) Source Water Protection WHY?
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1993 (403,000 sickened, over 104 died) -
Cryptosporidiosis Walkerton, Ontario, 2000 (2,500 sickened, 7 died)
E. coli Put-in-Bay, 2004 (1,400 sickened) Grand Lake St. Marys,
2010 (dog deaths, human illnesses)- Microcystin Source Water
Protection WHY?
Dayton fire, 1987 ($12 million) 1994 EDB spill on Ohio River (water
shipments, monitoring costs) Monroeville, 2000 (atrazine and
nitrate led to new reservoir $2.6 million) Source Water Protection
HOW?
:Ohio EPA sent Drinking Water Source Assessment Reports to public
water systems. Included maps of protection zones and potential
contaminant sources Source Water Protection HOW?
Delineation method differs for ground water vs. surface water
systems Surface Water Ground Water Ground Water Delineation
A protection area is the area surrounding a well or wellfield that
contributes water to the well.Ohio uses a five year time of travel
as the basis of the protection area. Delineation Approach Method is
selected based on:
Hydrogeologic Setting Availability of Data Pump Rate Method does
not vary by type of public water system. Source Water Protection
HOW?
and delineation methods differ for different types of surface water
systems: Inland Streams Ohio River Lake Erie Potential Contaminant
Source Inventory
Initial Inventory Land Use Analysis Site Visit Databases Compiled
for Initial Potential Contaminant Source Inventory
USEPA DATABASES (10) - Airborne Emissions - Superfund (CERCLA) -
Sites involving actions filed for U.S. EPA. (DOCKET) -TSD
facilities owned and operated by Federal agencies -Toxic Release
Inventory sites - National Compliance Database for FIFRA and the
TSCA - NPDES permit holding facilities - RCRA Hazardous waste
handlers - Pesticide-producing establishments - PCB Facilities
Additional Databases Searched (21)
- Abandoned mine lands - Oil & Gas Wells - Class 1 UIC wells -
Located Class 5 UIC wells - Confined Animal Feedlots - Construction
and demolition debris landfills - Industrial landfills - Municipal
landfills - Residual waste landfills - Inactive/closed landfills -
Unknown status landfills - Surface impoundments - Town Gas Sites -
Hospitals - Cemeteries - Airports - Leaking Underground Storage
Tanks - Underground Storage Tanks - Hazardous waste sites with
ground water monitoring information. - Sites reported to Ohio EPA
suspected of being contaminated Detailed Inventory Field Visit
Enter information into GIS database
Verify and correct database information Locate additional potential
contaminant sources Enter information into GIS database
Susceptibility Analysis
Description of Hydrologic Setting Summary of Potential Contaminant
Sources Review of Water Quality Data Pointers to Protection
Activities The purpose of the susceptibility analysis is to
determine the liklihood for the source water of a PWS to be
contaminated at concentrations that would pose a concern. (and
provide pointers towards protection activities). Now That Ive Got
the SWAP Report What Do I Do With It?
Use it for Consumer Confidence Reports Educate Local Residents
Complete a Protection Management Plan Public Education As Part of
the Protection Plan
Community Systems: Community-Wide Campaign Noncommunity Systems:
Employee Education Agriculture: Soil & Water, Farm Bureau Rural
Residential: Realtor, Bankers, Health Department Injection Wells:
Community Campaign Public Involvement Stakeholders Volunteers for
Inventory
Meetings with: Health Departments Soil & Water City
Administration Community Meetings County Farm Bureau Meetings Next
Steps Obtain Endorsement of - Completed Plan
Implement Protection Strategies - Education - Best Management
Practices Source Water Protection HOW?
The Protection Plan Must Address: Education and outreach Drinking
water shortage and emergency response Potential contaminant source
control strategies Need for additional water quality monitoring
Implementation schedule Commitment to update at least every ten
years Source Water Protection HOW?
Guidance for developing a Protection Plan is available atunder the
Protection Planning tab What Is Ohio EPA Doing to Promote Source
Water Protection?
Providing SWAP assessments Offering Protection Planning workshops
Maintaininga detailed Web page Tracking substantial implementation
Coordinating sampling for Drinking Water Beneficial Use Monitoring
hazardous algal blooms on drinking water sources Harmful Algal
Bloom (HAB) Response
OEPA samples PWS raw and finished water if there is likelihood of
cyanotoxins entering the water treatment plant However, OEPA does
not duplicate PWS cyanotoxin sampling if PWS is following Ohios
protocol and shares data with OEPA. OEPA uses NOAA Lake Erie HAB
bulletins to target sampling OEPA continues sampling until
cyanotoxins are below the threshold in two consecutive samples and
bloom has dissipated. This is incident response monitoring, not
routine sampling program. What Can You Do to Promote Source Water
Protection? Promote Coordination Most SWAP goals are also goals for
other programs: Prevent urban runoff MS4 program, Watershed Action
Plans Prevent agricultural runoff NPS, TMDL, Watershed Action
Plans, Farm Bill programs Promote green technologies innumerable
organizations, commercial and non-profit Promotelong-range planning
communitys planning department, and regional planning
organizations, Balanced Growth plans So why not incorporate SWAP
goalsand measurements into these programs workplans? Promote
Coordination For example, over the past 6 years, the watershed
coordinator for the Chagrin River Watershed Partners: Facilitated
adoption of model regulations Helped with one dam removal/700 feet
of floodplain restoration Helped implement 3 local nonpoint source
projects Coordinated restoration of a lake Implemented 2 low-impact
development projects Developed Balanced Growth Plan Updated model
ordinances Promote Green Technologies
Strategies to reduce urban runoff --Rooftop gardens --Rain barrels
--Rain gardens --Permeable pavement --Constructed wetlands
--Retention basins --Separation of stormwater from sanitary
wastewater Rooftop garden at Ohio EPAs Columbus office reduces the
buildings heating/ cooling costs and moderates rooftop runoff to
the Scioto River after storms Promote Green Technologies
Strategies to reduce agricultural runoff --Filter strips along
streamsand around sinkholes --No-till farming --Tile stops --Winter
cover crops (ryegrass, etc.) -- Integrated Pest Management For more
information on SWAP, please contact:
Richard Kroeger, Ohio EPA, Northwest District Office (Bowling
Green), Pam Nixon, Ohio EPA, Northeast District Office (Twinsburg),
For information on HABs in DW sources: Heather Raymond, Ohio EPA,
Central Office (Columbus),