sonia gandhi costing india dearly

8/14/2019 Sonia Gandhi costing India dearly

1/3

Sonia's presence in Delhi is costing India dearly

By : prarthana

Rating : Disabled

Margashirsha Shuddha Shashthi

By Francois Gautier

In 1898, the French writer Emile Zola wrote an open letter to the then French president in the newspaper

L'Aurore, titled j'accuse ('I accuse'), where he accused the French government of anti- Semitism towards

Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer unfairly condemned for treason.

Now it is time for the people of India to say openly that which many, including within the Congress, think

secretly and may utter in the privacy of their chambers.

It is not about Manmohan Singh, it is not even about Shivraj Patil, the fall guy; it is about that one person, the

Eminence Grise of India. She who pulls all the strings, She whose shadow looms menacingly over so many,

She who holds no portfolio, is just a simple elected MP, like 540 others, but rules like an empress.

Sometimes, one's very physical presence at the top is enough to move things, to influence the course of

events. One word from Her, a glance, a frown, are enough to put the whole heavy, inert, unwilling machinery

of India's bureaucracy and political system in full motion. Sometimes She need not say anything: in the true

tradition of Bhakti, Her ministers, Her secretaries, interpret Her silences and rush to cater to Her western and

Christian identity.

Nevertheless, she has said and acted enough so that one day she may stand accused on the pages ofHistory for what she must have done to India.

I'accuse Sonia Gandhi as being responsible for the tragedy of Mumbai, having emasculated India's

intelligence agencies by stopping them from investigating terror attacks in the last four years, including the

Mumbai train blasts. She has also neutralised the ATS by ordering them at all costs to ferret out 'Hindu

terrorism', which if it exists, has wrought minuscule damage compared to what Islamic terror has done since

2004. Did the US send a warning to India that there may be an attack on Mumbai and that the Taj would be

one of the targets? Were these ignored because the ATS was too busy chasing Hindu 'terrorists' on Sonia's

orders? I accuse Sonia and her government of having made the NSG the laughing stock of the world. How

many times did the NSG (who took ten hours to reach Mumbai) claim that it had "sanitised the Taj and that

the operation was over" and how many times did a bomb go off immediately after? For the last 20 years, the

NSG has guarded VIPs and has become soft. See the comments of Israeli terror specialists, who said the

NSG should have first sanitised the immediate surroundings of the places of conflict, kept the bystanders and

press (who gave terrorists watching TV in the Taj rooms a perfect report of the security forces' whereabouts)

out of the place, gathered enough information about the position of the terrorists and hostages before taking

action, instead of immediately engaging the terrorists, and ensuring the deaths of so many hostages.

I accuse Sonia of having let her Christian and Western background, in four years, divide India on religious

and caste lines in a cynical and methodical manner.

I accuse Sonia of weakening India's spirit of sacrifice and courage, so that 20 terrorists (or less) held atransom the financial capital of India for more than three days.

1/3
http://news/index.php?author/id:3http://news/index.php?author/id:3


2/3

I accuse Sonia Gandhi of always pointing the finger at Pakistan, when terrorism in India is now mostly

homegrown, even if it takes help, training, refuge and arms from Pakistan; of not warning Indians of the grave

dangers of Islamic terror for cynical election purposes.

I accuse Sonia of being an enemy of the Hindus, who always gave refuge to persecuted minorities, and who

are the only people in the world to accept that God may manifest under different names, in different epochs,

using different scriptures.

I accuse Sonia Gandhi of taking advantage of India's respect for women, its undue fascination with theGandhi name, and its stupid mania for White Skin.

I'accuse Sonia of exploiting the Indian Press' obsession with her. She hardly ever gave interview in 20 years,

except scripted ones to NDTV, yet the Press always protects her, never blames her and keeps silent over her

covert role.

I'accuse Sonia and her government of trying to make heroes of subservient and inefficient men to hide the

humiliation of Mumbai 26/11. Before going to his death, Hemant Karkare, the ATS chief, was shown on

television clumsily handling his helmet, as someone who uses it very rarely. Why did he die of bullet wounds

in the chest when he was wearing a bullet-proof vest? Either Indian vests are inferior quality or he was not

wearing one.

How did the terrorists who killed him and his fellow officer escape in the same vehicle used by the ATS chief

? Why did he and his officers go into Cama Hospital without ascertaining where the terrorists were? We

honour his death, but these facts say a lot about the ATS' battle-readiness.

Will someone in the Congress, someone who feels more Indian than faithful to Sonia, stand up and speak the

truth? Who said, "Go after Hindu terrorists"? Who insisted on putting pressure on BJP governments in

Karnataka or Orissa for so-called persecution of Christians, when Christians have always practised their faith

in total freedom here, while their missionaries are converting hundreds of thousands of innocent tribals and

Dalits with the billions of dollars given by gullible westerners? Who said, "Go soft on Islamic terrorism"? Whowants to do away with India's nuclear deterrence in the face of Pakistani and Chinese nuclear threats, by

pushing at all costs the one sided Indo-US nuclear deal, which makes no secret of its intention to

denuclearise India militarily? I am sure Sonia Gandhi has good qualities: she probably was a good wife to

Rajiv, a good daughter in law to Indira and by all accounts, she is a good mother to her children. One also

hears first-hand reports about her concern for smaller people, her dignity in the suffering that befell her when

her husband was blown to pieces, and her courtesy with visitors.

Nevertheless, she is a danger to India.

Her very presence, both physical and occult, open the doors to forces inimical to India. Even Indian

Christians should understand that she is not a gift to them: her presence at the top has emboldened fanatics

like John Dayal or Valson Thampu, who practise an orthodox Christianity prevalent in the West in the early

20th century, but no longer, to radicalise their flock. Indian Christians should recognise that they have a much

better deal here than Christians or Hindus have in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia or Saudi Arabia.

Under Sonia's rule, Indian Muslims, too, have been used as electoral pawns. They have been encouraged to

shun the Sufi streak, a blend of the best of Islam and Vedanta, for a hard-line Sunni brand imported from

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

For the good of India, her civilisation, her immense spirituality and culture, Sonia Gandhi has to go and a

government that thinks Indian, breathes nationalism and will protect its citizens must be voted to power.

Source:Express Buzz

2/3
http://0.0.0.0/http://0.0.0.0/


3/3

Also See

1. Protest against ban on pro-Hindu Sanatan Sanstha

2. Hindu Dharmajagruti Sabha

3/3
http://0.0.0.0/http://0.0.0.0/http://0.0.0.0/http://0.0.0.0/

sonia gandhi costing india dearly

Documents