AIESEC Romania Report

September 2010 & Q3

Introduction•This report is a summary of the

main indicators that show our organizational performance, created with graphs for an easier understanding of the data presented

•It consists of standard analysis (Points 1 to 3) and a customized one for every month (Point 4).

Summary

1.Exchange Status

2.Membership Status

3.Financial Status

4.Q3 Report

1. Exchange status - Performance vs last year

1. Exchange status - Realized vs Planned for June

Conclusions• Total No of X Realizations for AIESEC RO: 45

• +12 | +36.3% vs. last year

• -12 | -21.5% vs. planned

• 40 OGX & 5 ICX

• Total No of X+L Realizations for AIESEC RO: 22

• +7 | +46.6% vs. last year

• LCs that exceed last years performance: CJ, CR, CT, IS, OR, TM

• LCs that maintained their last year’s performance: BU, PI, SB, TGM

• LCs that overachieved what they planned: CR, OR, PI

• LCs that achieved what they planned: CJ, IS, BV

• X+L Contribution for this month: BV, BU, CJ, CT, CR, IS, OR, PI, TM

MC’s thoughts

2. Membership Status - No of Active Members

2. Membership Status - Members efficiency

Conclusions• Total No of X Active Members in AIESEC RO: 453

• -51 | -10.11% vs. May

• Members efficiency: 10 Mb work for 1 X

• 26.3 was for September 2009

• 10.7 was for August 2010

• Target for term: 2

• Top 3 LCs with active Mb: IS, CR, GL

• LC with most efficient members: CJ (3.8)

MC’s thoughts

3. Financial situation - Revenue Diversification

3. Financial situation - Revenue Diversification for Country

3. Financial situation - Grant Applications

3. Financial situation - Reserve Policy

*Calculated using the following formula: Reserve fund/Operational budget per month

ConclusionsTotal value of incomes for LCs: €8.242

• Corporate - €2.099 | 25.5%

• Exchange - €2.878 | 34.9%

• Grants - €800 | 9.7%

• Alumni - €130 | 1.6%

• 2% & 3‰ - €2.335 | 28.5% (€2.177 - CR Congrats!)

• Other sources - €0 | 0%

•LCs that had X as sources of revenue*: BU, BV, IS, TM, CJ, SB, PI, CT

•5 LCs applied for Grants, 2 LC received a grant: BU, CJ

•6 LCs can support their operating budget from reserves for more that 3 months: BU, TM, TGM, CT, CR, IS

*≥ 20% out of Total Revenues

MC’s thoughts

4. Q3 Report - MoS realized vs. last year for AIESEC Ro

* Reporting in SONA has some issues for some LCs, data was taken from the Platform

4. Q3 Report - MoS Planned vs. Realized for AIESEC Ro

AIESEC Ro overall achievement for Q3 of MoS: 85.8%* Reporting in SONA has some issues for some LCs, data was taken from the Platform

4. Q3 Report - Members Efficiency

* Reporting in SONA has some issues for some LCs, data was taken from the Platform

Term Target

4. Q3 Report - LCs MoS Realizations

4. Q3 Report - Clustering Map Simulation*

* The Detailed Report will be released after the 15th of October

LCPerformanc

e ScoreEfficiency

Score

Romania 8.82 8.08

Brasov 8.20 6.38

Bucuresti 7.90 7.39

Cluj Napoca

8.14 7.60

Craiova 10.00 8.29

Constanta 6.67 6.14

Galati 7.06 7.06

Iasi 7.57 7.11

Oradea 7.51 5.11

Pitesti 8.33 6.29

Ploiesti 3.60 4.09

Sibiu 5.40 4.75

Targu Mures

8.50 6.10

Timisoara 9.00 6.01

PI

TGM

CJ

Conclusions• Overall TNs realized for Q3: 105

• +55 | +110% vs. last year

• -16 | -13.2% vs. planned

• Overall EPs realized for Q3: 116

• +51 | +78.4% vs. last year

• -41 | -26.1% vs. planned

• Overall X+L realized for Q3: 47

• +23 | +95.8% vs. last year

• 0 | 0% vs. planned

• Top 3 LCs performing LCs (based on MoS realization): CR, Pi, CJ

• AIESEC Ro overall status for Q3:

• 85.8% vs. planned

• On the 1st of October Romania reached for Q3, 221 Re, representing the best performance in Realizations for one quarter. The closest performance to this one is Q3 2009 with 118 Re.

• Place 1st in CEE regarding X+L and 4th in the World (28 X+L Re for Q3)

• AIESEC Ro Members Efficiency for Q3: 2.04 (Congrats!)

• -6.98 vs. Q2

• +0.04 vs. Term Standard

MC’s thoughts

Final thoughts

Thank You