some halo current measurements in 2009 s.p. gerhardt thanks to: e. fredrickson, h. takahashi, l....

9
Some Halo Current Measurements in Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew U Ioffe Inst RRC Kurchatov Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST POSTECH ASIPP ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep U Quebec

Upload: ethan-higgins

Post on 18-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009

S.P. GerhardtThanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora

NSTX Results Review, 2009

NSTXNSTX Supported by

College W&MColorado Sch MinesColumbia UCompXGeneral AtomicsINELJohns Hopkins ULANLLLNLLodestarMITNova PhotonicsNew York UOld Dominion UORNLPPPLPSIPrinceton UPurdue USNLThink Tank, Inc.UC DavisUC IrvineUCLAUCSDU ColoradoU IllinoisU MarylandU RochesterU WashingtonU Wisconsin

Culham Sci CtrU St. Andrews

York UChubu UFukui U

Hiroshima UHyogo UKyoto U

Kyushu UKyushu Tokai U

NIFSNiigata UU Tokyo

JAEAHebrew UIoffe Inst

RRC Kurchatov InstTRINITI

KBSIKAIST

POSTECHASIPP

ENEA, FrascatiCEA, Cadarache

IPP, JülichIPP, Garching

ASCR, Czech RepU Quebec

Page 2: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 29/16/2009

Halo Current Detection in NSTX

3 Rogowskis on the Center Column (pre-2008)

• One rogowski (CSCL1) broken into three segments.

• The other two (CSCL2 and CSCU1) continuous

Arrays of Toroidal Field Sensors (2008)

• Poloidal current flowing in vessel wall

• One array of 6 sensors near CHI gap (Inner Ring)

• One array of 6 sensors between OBD and SPP (Outer Ring)

Arrays of Instrumented Tiles (2009)

• 4 Tiles in row 3 of the outboard divertor (OBDLR3)

• 90º Toroidal Separation

• Highly localized measurements of the current

Page 3: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 39/16/2009

Novel Instrumented Tile Design Implemented For Four Tile #3s in the Lower Outboard Divertor

Design by S. Gerhardt, L. Guttadora, E. Fredrickson, and H. Takahashi

Mica Insulator

Folded Stainless Resistor

Resistor and Insulator “Sandwich”

Tile: Thinned, with a small pocketBolts and Washers with Insulating Ceramic Coating

Insulating Mica Washers

T-Bar: Thinned with small pocket

Stainless leads spot-welded to resistor, then spliced to shielded twisted Cu pair.

Page 4: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 49/16/2009

Example #1: Currents Flowing Out of OBD Row #3 (132186)

t=0.36 t=0.376

t=0.379 t=0.381

• Currents flow into the OBD near the CHI gap, and out of the OBD near tile #3

• Row-3 currents peak before the Inner-Ring currents• Essentially no currents on the center-stack.

Page 5: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 59/16/2009

Example #2 Upward VDE (132422)

• No conducting path between machine top and bottom.• Current flows down the outer vessel, along the machine bottom, and up the

center-stack• No current flow through row #3 tiles

t=0.438t=0.436

t=0.425

Halo currents local to the vessel top are undiagnosed in NSTX

Page 6: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 69/16/2009

Have Reasonable Measurements of HCF vs. TPF at Three Different Locations

• Row 3 of Outboard Divertor• New for 2009

• For Positive IHC, HCF

• Vacuum Vessel Near CHI Gap• 2008 & 2009 Data

• Lower Center Stack Casing• Correction to account for poor

TPF sensitivity of segmented CSC rogowski.

Upward Going VDEs show small peaking on the lower CSC

Downward VDEs show more peaking

?

Page 7: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 79/16/2009

Axisymmetric Halo Current Directions Changed After BT was Flipped (~135702)

On Vessel Wall Near CHI Gap Shunt Tiles in Row #3 of Outboard Divertor

Ip Direction

Force -free HCs induced during IP quench to replace this current.

DivertorFloor

BT (forward)IHC IHC

BT (reversed)

IHC Out of FloorIHC Into of Floor

Downward Going VDEs Landing Near CHI Gap

Upward Going VDEsDownward Going VDEs

Landing Near CHI Gap

Downward Going VDEs Landing Near SPP

Page 8: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 89/16/2009

Preliminary Analysis Shows that Currents of 20-30 kA per LLD Segment Should Be Anticipated For Rare Events

• Current density measured from tiles in outboard divertor.

• LLD Area is ~1m2, divided into four quadrants.

– A=2RR=20.780.2=1m2

• Maximum halo current density in row 3 observed for the low-, drsep<0 cases.

– These are exactly the conditions of the LLD baseline scenario.

• Halo currents of 20-30 kA/segment should be assumed for the rare worst case.

– Caveat, need to carefully look at the data for these worst cases.

• Halo current measurements will be an important part of the LLD operational experience.

Likely LLDOperatingSpace

Page 9: Some Halo Current Measurements in 2009 S.P. Gerhardt Thanks to: E. Fredrickson, H. Takahashi, L. Guttadora NSTX Results Review, 2009 NSTX Supported by

NSTXNSTX 2009 NSTX Results Review, Halo Currents (Gerhardt) 99/16/2009

Substantial Upgrade to Capability For 2010

Shunt Tiles In Red

Rogooskis in Blue

• Keep the Old Diagnostics• Center stack casing rogowskis• Lower vacuum vessel current measurements

• Add Some New Ones• Each LLD Segment has a Small Rogowski on its single point ground• 6 shunt tiles in row 3 of the lower outboard divertor• 6 shunt tiles in row 4 of the lower outboard divertor