solving some gauge systems at infinite n · • duality between the strong- and weak-coupling...

28
SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N G. Veneziano, J.W. 1 YANG-MILLS QUANTUM MECHANICS QCD| V =−→ QCD| V =0 H = 1 2 p i a p i a + g 2 4 ǫ abc ǫ ade x i b x j c x i d x j e + ig 2 ǫ abc ψ a Γ k ψ b x k c , i =1,..,D 1 a =1,...,N 2 1. Bjorken (’79) – femto-universe uscher (’83) – lattice small volume expansion Banks, Fischler, Shenker, Susskind (’97) – M-theory 1

Upload: others

Post on 11-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS

AT INFINITE N

G. Veneziano, J.W.

1 YANG-MILLS QUANTUM MECHANICS

• QCD|V=∞ −→ QCD|V=0

H =1

2piap

ia +

g2

4ǫabcǫadex

ibxjcx

idx

je +

ig

2ǫabcψ

†aΓ

kψbxkc ,

i = 1, .., D − 1 a = 1, ..., N 2 − 1.

⇒ Bjorken (’79) – femto-universe

⇒ Luscher (’83) – lattice small volume expansion

⇒ Banks, Fischler, Shenker, Susskind (’97) – M-theory

1

Page 2: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

• The spectrum is quantitatively calculable !

⇒ States, the Fock space:

|n〉 =a†n

√n!|0〉, n no of quanta

〈m|H|n〉 ⇒ Em, ψm(x) (1)

⇒ The cutoff

n ≤ nmax ⇒ Em(nmax), nmax −→ ∞ (2)

2

Page 3: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

02

46

F

0

2

4

J

5

7.5

10

12.5

15

E

Figure 1: The spectrum of the SU(2) supersymmetric Yang-Mills quantum mechanics in 3+1 dimensions (with M. Cam-postrini)

3

Page 4: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

D 2 4 . . . 10N2 • • ◦3 •. ◦. ◦.∞ ⊙ M

Table 1:

M. Campostrini, M. Trzetrzelewski, J. Kotanski, P. Korcyl

P. van Baal, R. Janik

4

Page 5: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

2 THE LARGE N LIMIT

• Only single trace states contribute at large N.

• Only single trace operators are relevant

• A simple supersymmetric Hamiltonian

(QM of one boson and one fermion in 1+1 dimensions, at N = ∞)

• The phase transition at λ(= g2N) = 1

• Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ)

• Analytic solution

• Equivalence, at strong coupling, with the Heisenberg model (spin chain)

and, independently, with the q-bosonic gas

⇒ hidden supersymmetry in statistical models

hep-th/0512301, 0603045, 0607198 , 0609210, 0610172

mat-ph/0603082 with E. Onofri

E. Onofri et al., M. Beccaria, P. Korcyl

5

Page 6: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

3 ONE SUPERSYMMETRIC HAMILTONIAN

Q =√

2Tr[fa†(1 + ga†)],

Q† =√

2Tr[f †(1 + ga)a]

H = {Q,Q†} = HB +HF .

HB = Tr[a†a + g(a†2a + a†a2) + g2a†

2a2].

HF = Tr[f †f + g(f †f(a† + a) + f †(a† + a)f)

+ g2(f †afa† + f †aa†f + f †fa†a + f †a†fa)]

LARGE N MATRIX ELEMENTS OF H

F=0 |0, n〉 = Tr[a†n]|0〉/

√Nn

< 0, n|H|0, n > = (1 + λ(1 − δn1))n,

< 0, n + 1|H|0, n >=< 0, n|H|0, n + 1 > =√λ√

n(n + 1).

F=1

< 1, n|H|1, n > = (1 + λ)(n + 1) + λ,

< 1, n + 1|H|1, n >=< 1, n|H2|1, n + 1 > =√λ(2 + n).

6

Page 7: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

THE SPECTRUM

1 1.5 2 2.5 3F=0 F=1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

E

lambda=1.0

Figure 2: First 10 energy levels of H in F=0 and F=1 sectors at λ = 0.5

• Supersymmetry is unbroken in this model.

• Only breaking was due to the cutoff.

• Good test of the planar calculus.

7

Page 8: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

• Well defined system for all values of ’t Hooft coupling.

• At λ = 0 - SUSY harmonic oscillators

• Almost equidistant levels for all λ

• All levels collapse at λc = 1.

8

Page 9: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

0 20 40 60 80B

0

5

10

15

20

E

l=0.7

0 20 40 60 80B

020406080

100120

E

l=7.0

0 20 40 60 80B

0

5

10

15

20

E

l=0.4

0 20 40 60 80B

0

10

20

30

40

E

l=2.0

0 20 40 60 80B

02.5

57.510

12.515

17.5

E

l=0.2

0 20 40 60 80B

0

5

10

15

20

25

E

l=1.0

Figure 3: The cutoff dependence of the spectra of H, in the F=0 sector

for a range of λ’s

9

Page 10: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

THE PHASE TRANSITION

• The critical slowing down

• Any finite number of levels collapses at λc = 1 - the spectrum looses its

energy gap - it becomes continuous.

• Second ground state with E = 0 appears in the strong coupling phase.

• Rearrangement of supermultiplets.

• Witten index has a discontinuity at λc.

• The strong - weak duality.

10

Page 11: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

0 0.5 1 1.5 2l

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

E

B=400

0 0.5 1 1.5 2l

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

E

B=40

0 0.5 1 1.5 2l

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

E

B=20

11

Page 12: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

ANALYTIC SOLUTION

CONSTRUCTION OF THE SECOND GROUND STATE

b ≡√λ (3)

|0〉2 =∞∑

n=1

−1

b

n 1√n|0, n〉 . (4)

STRONG/WEAK DUALITY

• F=0

b

E(F=0)n (1/b) − 1

b2

=1

b

(

E(F=0)n+1 (b) − b2

)

. (5)

• F=1

b

E(F=1)n (1/b) − 1

b2

=1

b

(

E(F=1)n (b) − b2

)

12

Page 13: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

3.1 SPECTRUM AND EIGENSTATES

• The planar basis

|0, n〉 =1

NnTr[a†

n]|0〉

• A non-orthonormal (but useful) basis:

|Bn〉 =√n|n〉 + b

√n + 1|n + 1〉 .

• The generating function f(x) for the expansion of the eigenstates |ψ >

into the |Bn〉 basis.

f(x) =∞∑

n=0cnx

n ↔ |ψ〉 =∞∑

n=0cn|Bn〉

• The Hψ = Eψ ⇒

w(x)f ′(x) + xf (x) − ǫf (x) = bf (0) + f ′(0),

w(x) = (x + b)(x + 1/b), E = b(ǫ + b)

13

Page 14: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

• The solution

f(x) =1

α

1

x + 1/bF (1, α; 1 + α;

x + b

x + 1/b), b < 1,

f(x) =1

1 − α

1

x + bF (1, 1 − α; 2 − α;

x + 1/b

x + b), b > 1,

E = α(b2 − 1)

• The quantization condition

f(0) = 0 ⇒ En reproduces the numerical eigenvalues of 〈m|H|n〉

• One more check: set α = 0 in the b > 1 solution.

f0(x) =1

1 + bxlog

b + x

b− 1/b, b > 1, (6)

• Generates the second vacuum state as it should.

• Cannot do this for b < 1 – there is no such state at weak coupling!

14

Page 15: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

F=2,3

States with F fermions are labeled by F bosonic occupation numbers

(configurations).

|n〉 = |n1, n2, . . . , nF 〉 =1

N{n}Tr(a†

n1f †a†n2f † . . . a†

nFf †)|0〉

• Cyclic shifts give the same state

• Pauli principle −→ some configurations are not allowed, e.g.

{n, n}, or {2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1}

• Degeneracy factors

15

Page 16: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

1 1.5 2 2.5 30

1

2

3

4

5

E

F=0 F=1

λ=0.5

1 1.5 2 2.5 30

2.5

5

7.5

10

12.5

15

17.5λ=2.0

F=2 F=3

Figure 4: Low lying bosonic and fermionic levels in the first four fermionic

sectors.

SUPERMULTIPLETS

• supermultiplets OK

• F=(0 - 1) accommodate complete representations of SUSY,

but F=(2 - 3) do not

• Richer structure than in 0/1, e.g. not equidistant levels.

16

Page 17: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

REARRANGEMENT OF F=2 AND F=3 SUPERPARTNERS

• The phase transition is there, as in 0/1 sectors.

• Supermultiplets rearrange across the phase transition point.

• Two new vacua appear in the strong coupling phase!

• The exact construction of both vacua.

17

Page 18: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

λ

E

F=2 and F=3

Figure 5: Rearrangement of the F = 2 (red) and F = 3 (black) levels while

passing through the critical coupling λc = 1.

18

Page 19: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5

1

2

3

4

5

qn + n− 1

Bmax

Figure 6: First five supersymmetry fractions.

SUPERSYMMETRY FRACTIONS

qmn ≡√

2

Em + En< F + 1, Em|Q†|F,En > (7)

19

Page 20: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

RESTRICTED WITTEN INDEX

W (T, λ) =∑

i(−1)Fie−TEi

No good when supermultiplets are incomplete (if no SUSY).

New definition - ”analytic continuation” into the critical region.

WR(T, λ) =∑

i

(

e−TEi − e−TEi

)

, Ei =∑

f Ef |qfi|2∑

f |qfi|2

20

Page 21: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.750

0.5

1

1.5

2

IW (6)

λ

Figure 7: Behaviour of the restricted Witten index, at T = 6, around the phase

transition.

21

Page 22: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

THE STRONG COUPLING LIMIT

Hstrong = limλ→∞

1

λH = (8)

Tr(f †f)+1

N[Tr(a†

2a2) + Tr(a†f †af) + Tr(f †a†fa)].

• It conserves both F and B = n1 + n2 + . . . + nF .

• Still has exact supersymmetry.

• Hstrong is the finite matrix in each (F,B) sector (c.f. a map of all sectors).

• The SUSY vacua are only in the sectors with even F and (F,B = F ± 1)

– the magic staircase

22

Page 23: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

11 1 1 6 26 91 ... ... ... ... ... 16796

10 1 1 5 22 73 201 497 1144 ... ... ...

9 1 1 5 19 55 143 335 715 1430 ... 4862

8 1 1 4 15 42 99 212 429 809 1430 2424

7 1 1 4 12 30 66 132 247 429 715 1144

6 1 1 3 10 22 42 76 132 217 335 497

5 1 1 3 7 14 26 42 66 99 143 201

4 1 1 2 5 9 14 20 30 43 55 70

3 1 1 2 4 5 7 10 12 15 19 22

2 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 5

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0

B

F 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Table 2: Sizes of gauge invariant bases in the (F,B) sectors.

• The magic staircase ⇒ there are always two SUSY vacua at finite λ (in

the strong coupling phase).

23

Page 24: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

4 q-BOSON GAS

• A one dimensional, periodic lattice with length F .

• A boson at each lattice site ai, i = 1, ..., F

• The new Hamiltonian

H = B +F∑

i=1δNi,0 +

F∑

i=1bib

†i+1 + bib

†i−1, (9)

where Ni = a†iai and B = n1 + n2 + ... + nF .

• The b†i (bi) operators create (annihilate) one quantum without the usual√n factors – assisted transitions.

b†|n〉 = |n + 1〉, b|n〉 = |n− 1〉, b|0〉 ≡ 0,

[b, b†] = δN,0 (10)

• This Hamiltonan conserves B.

• It is also invariant under lattice shifts U .

• The spectrum of above H,

in the sector with λU = −1, exactly coincides with the spectrum of

Hstrong, for even F and any B.

24

Page 25: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

• q-bosons: the b and b† c/a operators are defined by

b† = a†√

[N + 1]q√N + 1

, b =

[N + 1]q√N + 1

a,

[x]q ≡1 − q−2x

1 − q−2, (11)

and satisfy the q−deformed algebra of the harmonic oscillator

[b, b†] = q−2N . (12)

(13)

Therefore our SUSY-equivalent system corresponds to q → ∞.

• q-Bose gas was considered non-soluble (Bogoliubov) ... until now.

25

Page 26: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

5 THE XXZ MODEL

The one dimensional chain of Heisenberg spins

H(∆)XXZ = −1

2

L∑

i=1(σxi σ

xi+1 + σyi σ

yi+1 + ∆ σzi σ

zi+1)

• Our planar system, at strong coupling, is equivalent to the XXZ chain

with

L = F +B, Sz =L∑

i=1szi = F −B, and ∆ = ±1

2

• Riazumov-Stroganv conjecture: for odd L and Sz = ±1 there exists an

eigenstate with known, simple eigenvalue E = 34L.

• ⇒ the R-S states are the SUSY vacua of HSC !

• Even more: there is a hidden supersymmetric structure in the Heisen-

berg chain.

• SUSY relates lattices of different sizes.

26

Page 27: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

6 BETHE ANSATZ

• The XXZ model is soluble by the Bethe Ansatz

• The existence of the magic staircase can be proven using BA

BA can be solved analytically for the first three magic sectors

Bethe phases for F=6,B=5 → 42 × 42

x =1

72

36 + i√

2√

11 +√

13(7 +√

13) − 6√

2

6(−3 +√

13) + i√

2√

11 +√

13(−5 +√

13)

y =1

72

36 + i√

2√

11 +√

13(7 +√

13) + 6√

2

6(−3 +√

13) + i√

2√

11 +√

13(−5 +√

13)

27

Page 28: SOLVING SOME GAUGE SYSTEMS AT INFINITE N · • Duality between the strong- and weak-coupling phases: En(1/λ) ↔ En(λ) ... • Only breaking was due to the cutoff. • Good test

7 FROM N=3,4,5 TO INFINITY

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0λ

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

E1

E1: a of fit to a + b/N

E1: SU(3)

E1: SU(4)

E1: SU(5)

E1: Jacek’s

VW model, E extrapolated to N → ∞Massimo, 12 May 2006

Figure 8: Lowest eigenenergy for N=3,4,5, and its linear extrapolation to N = ∞,together with the planar result

28