solution proposal

36
Copyright © 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. Feb 2014 OLAM SAP PI Solution Proposal

Upload: scribeuser04

Post on 26-Nov-2015

130 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

test document for download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    Feb 2014

    OLAM SAP PI Solution Proposal

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    2

    Problem Statement

    System Landscape

    Handshake Transactions

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    a) Option1 : Using IDOC Adapter to JDBC Adapter b) Option2 : Using ABAP Proxy to JDBC Adapter

    c) Option3 : Using RFC Adapter to JDBC Adapter d) Options Analysis & Our Recommended option

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    a) Option1 : Using JDBC Adapter to IDOC Adapter b) Option2 :Using JDBC Adapter to ABAP Proxy

    c) Option3 : Using JDBC Adapter to RFC Adapter d) Options Analysis & Our Recommended option

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with iOlam

    a) Option1 : Using JDBC Adapter to JDBC Adapter b) Option2 :Using FILE Adapter to JDBC Adapter

    c) Options Analysis & Our Recommended option

    Interface Transactions

    Design Approach for MiniOPS Integration with iOlam

    a) Option1 : Using IDOC Adapter to JDBC Adapter b) Option2 : Using ABAP Proxy to JDBC Adapter

    c) Option3 : Using RFC Adapter to JDBC Adapter d) Options Analysis & Our Recommended option

    Error Handling and Alert Notification

    Plan and Resource loading

    OLAM Interface Estimations

    Key Expectation from OLAM

    NTTDATA SAP Process Integration Practice Overview

    NTTDATA SAP PI Case Studies

    Agenda

  • 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 3

    Problem Statement

    To design best design solution approach for the various handshake and Interface Transaction Scenarios to be implemented in OLAM by using SOA Middleware Tool (SAP PI) between various legacy systems like OPS (Order Processing System), OFS (Oracle Finance System), iOlam, MiniOPS with SAP systems like SAP GT (Global Template Instance) and SAP QC (Australia Instance)

    To configure Alert Mechanism to handle to various technical, business and miscellaneous exceptions like if transaction is not valid or missing some important data, etc. via email communication automatically

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 4

    OLAM System Landscape

    OPS

    SAP GT

    iOlam

    SAP QC Mini OPS

    OFS OFS

    OPS

    SAP PI

    Handshake Transactions Interface Transactions

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 5

    Handshake Transactions

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 6

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option 1: Using IDOC to JDBC Adapter

    SAP GT OPS SAP PI

    Pros: Simplest of all designs Easy to Track and Monitor Reprocessing failed IDOC is possible Better Performance

    Cons It will work in Asynchronous mode only

    IDOC Adapter JDBC Adapter Purchase Contract To Be Decided (TBD) TBD Sale Credit Memo Purchase Credit Memo Sale invoice Purchase Invoice

    Sale Deal Sampling Shipment Planning Purchase Debit note Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note

    SAP PI

    SAP QC OPS SAP PI

    IDOC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Sale Contract Goods Issue Sale Invoice Sale Invoice Sale Credit memo

    Purchase Contract Stock Shipment Purchase Invoice Purchase Credit note Purchase Debit note

    SAP PI

    SAP GT OFS SAP PI

    IDOC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes

    Account Payable

    SAP PI

    SAP QC OFS

    IDOC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes Account Payable

    SAP PI

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 7

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option 2: Using ABAP Proxy to JDBC Adapter

    SAP GT OPS SAP PI

    ABAP Proxy JDBC Adapter Purchase Contract To Be Decided (TBD) TBD Sale Credit Memo Purchase Credit Memo Sale invoice Purchase Invoice

    Sale Deal Sampling Shipment Planning Purchase Debit note Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note

    SAP PI

    SAP QC OPS SAP PI

    ABAP Proxy JDBC Adapter

    Sale Contract Goods Issue Sale Invoice Sale Invoice Sale Credit memo

    Purchase Contract Stock Shipment Purchase Invoice Purchase Credit note Purchase Debit note

    SAP PI

    SAP GT OFS SAP PI

    ABAP Proxy JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes

    Account Payable

    SAP PI

    SAP QC OFS

    ABAP Proxy JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes Account Payable

    SAP PI

    Pros: Better error handling mechanism Good for large volume of data Reduction of overhead function calling Can make Synchronous & Asynchronous calls

    Cons Increased effort as a different ABAP Proxy has to be programmed for each interface

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 8

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option 3: Using RFC Adapter to JDBC Adapter

    SAP GT OPS SAP PI

    RFC Adapter JDBC Adapter Purchase Contract To Be Decided (TBD) TBD Sale Credit Memo Purchase Credit Memo Sale invoice Purchase Invoice

    Sale Deal Sampling Shipment Planning Purchase Debit note Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note

    SAP PI

    SAP QC OPS SAP PI

    RFC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Sale Contract Goods Issue Sale Invoice Sale Invoice Sale Credit memo

    Purchase Contract Stock Shipment Purchase Invoice Purchase Credit note Purchase Debit note

    SAP PI

    SAP GT OFS SAP PI

    RFC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes

    Account Payable

    SAP PI

    SAP QC OFS

    RFC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes Account Payable

    SAP PI

    Pros: Avoid making multiple calls to the same BAPI / RFC, rather have wrapper BAPI and send all records in one time RFC/BAPI support BE (Best Effort) when used synchronously.

    Cons Not Good for Large Volume of data RFC or BAPI has its own overhead of function call Not advisable for Asynchronous communication

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 9

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option Analysis and Recommended Option

    Based on Efforts Comparison vs. Technical trade off

    Options Detail Efforts Complexity Flexibility /Scalability

    Limitations

    Option1 IDOC Adapter

    Option2 ABAP proxy

    Option3 RFC Adapter

    Our Recommendation OPTION 1:IDOC to JDBC Adapter would suite for MM/SD/FI/GL related Transactions for OPS / OFS system Integration with SAP GT / QC Systems

    Note: As we are using standard IDOC Contents

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 10

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option 1: Using JDBC to IDOC Adapter

    OPS SAP GT SAP PI

    Pros: Simplest of all designs Easy to Track and Monitor Reprocessing failed IDOC is possible Better Performance

    Cons It will work in Asynchronous mode only

    JDBC Adapter IDOC Adapter Purchase Deal Sale Invoice Price Fixing Purchase Debit note Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note

    Sale Contract Purchase Invoice Price Fixing Sale Credit Memo Purchase Credit Memo Sale invoice Purchase Invoice

    SAP PI

    OPS SAP QC SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter IDOC Adapter

    Sale Deal Sale Contract

    SAP PI

    OFS SAP GT SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter IDOC Adapter

    Prepayment Account Receivable

    Account Payable DA Bill

    SAP PI

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 11

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option 2: Using JDBC to ABAP Proxy

    OPS SAP GT SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter ABAP Proxy Purchase Deal Sale Invoice Price Fixing Purchase Debit note Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note

    Sale Contract Purchase Invoice Price Fixing Sale Credit Memo Purchase Credit Memo Sale invoice Purchase Invoice

    SAP PI

    OPS SAP QC SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter ABAP Proxy

    Sale Deal Sale Contract

    SAP PI

    OFS SAP GT SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter ABAP Proxy

    Prepayment Account Receivable

    Account Payable DA Bill

    SAP PI

    Pros: Better error handling mechanism Good for large volume of data Reduction of overhead function calling Can make Synchronous & Asynchronous calls

    Cons Increased effort as a different ABAP Proxy has to be programmed for each interface

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 12

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option 3: Using JDBC to RFC Adapter

    OPS SAP GT SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter RFC Adapter Purchase Deal Sale Invoice Price Fixing Purchase Debit note Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note

    Sale Contract Purchase Invoice Price Fixing Sale Credit Memo Purchase Credit Memo Sale invoice Purchase Invoice

    SAP PI

    OPS SAP QC SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter RFC Adapter

    Sale Deal Sale Contract

    SAP PI

    OFS SAP GT SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter RFC Adapter

    Prepayment Account Receivable

    Account Payable DA Bill

    SAP PI

    Pros: Avoid making multiple calls to the same BAPI / RFC, rather have wrapper BAPI and send all records in one time RFC/BAPI support BE (Best Effort) when used synchronously.

    Cons Not Good for Large Volume of data RFC or BAPI has its own overhead of function call Not advisable for Asynchronous communication

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 13

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with SAP GT/QC

    Option Analysis and Recommended Option

    Based on Efforts Comparison vs. Technical trade off

    Options Detail Efforts Complexity Flexibility /Scalability

    Limitations

    Option1 IDOC Adapter

    Option2 ABAP proxy

    Option3 RFC Adapter

    Our Recommendation OPTION 1:JDBC to IDOC Adapter would suite for MM/SD/FI/GL related Transactions for OPS / OFS system Integration with SAP GT / QC Systems

    Note: As we are using standard IDOC Contents

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 14

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with iOlam

    Option 1: Using JDBC to JDBC Adapter

    iOlam OPS SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter JDBC Adapter Sale Contract Purchase Contract Sales Way Bill Shipment Advice Export Invoice Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note Purchase Debit note

    Purchase Deal Sale Deal Stock Shipment Stock Shipment Purchase Invoice Purchase Debit note Sale Debit note Purchase Credit note Sale Credit note

    SAP PI

    OPS iOlam SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Sale Deal Purchase Debit note Sales Debit note Purchase Credit note Sales Credit note

    Purchase Contract Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sales Debit note Purchase Debit note

    SAP PI

    iOlam OFS SAP PI

    JDBC Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes Account Payable

    SAP PI

    OFS iOlam

    JDBC Adapter JDBC Adapter Prepayment Account Receivable

    Account Payable DA Bill

    SAP PI

    Pros: Can read any database if proper drivers are installed Creates XML structure of data from db automatically No content conversion required Can be used for both Synchronous & Asynchronous

    Cons Correct drivers need to be deployed for each type of database Cannot update or insert multiple tables with sequence

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 15

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with iOlam

    Option 2: Using FILE to JDBC Adapter

    iOlam OPS SAP PI

    FILE Adapter JDBC Adapter Sale Contract Purchase Contract Sales Way Bill Shipment Advice Export Invoice Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sale Debit note Purchase Debit note

    Purchase Deal Sale Deal Stock Shipment Stock Shipment Purchase Invoice Purchase Debit note Sale Debit note Purchase Credit note Sale Credit note

    SAP PI

    OPS iOlam SAP PI

    FILE Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Sale Deal Purchase Debit note Sales Debit note Purchase Credit note Sales Credit note

    Purchase Contract Sale Credit note Purchase Credit note Sales Debit note Purchase Debit note

    SAP PI

    iOlam OFS SAP PI

    FILE Adapter JDBC Adapter

    Expense Debit notes Account Payable

    SAP PI

    OFS iOlam

    FILE Adapter JDBC Adapter Prepayment Account Receivable

    Account Payable DA Bill

    SAP PI

    Pros: Simplest of all design

    Cons Not Good for Large Volume of data Difficult to Track and monitor

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 16

    Design Approach for OPS/OFS Integration with iOlam

    Option Analysis and Recommended Option

    Based on Efforts Comparison vs. Technical trade off

    Options Detail Efforts Complexity Flexibility /Scalability

    Limitations

    Option1 JDBC Adapter

    Option2 FILE Adapter

    Our Recommendation OPTION 1:JDBC to JDBC Adapter would suite for MM/SD/FI/GL related Transactions for OPS / OFS system Integration with iOlam / MiniOPS System

    Note: As we are using standard Oracle Drivers for the database

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 17

    Interface Transactions

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 18

    Design Approach for MiniOPS Integration with SAP GT

    Option 1: Using JDBC to IDOC Adapter

    SAP GT MiniOPS

    Pros: Simplest of all designs Easy to Track and Monitor Reprocessing failed IDOC is possible Better Performance

    Cons It will work in Asynchronous mode only

    JDBC Adapter IDOC Adapter

    Sales Deal

    Purchase Deal Stock Shipment

    Merge Direct Shipment Direct Shipment Purchase Invoice

    Sale Invoice Purchase Debit note

    Sales Debit note Purchase Credit note

    Sales Credit note Price fixing

    Futures Processing Journals Negotiation

    Sale Contract Purchase Order Goods Receipt

    Goods Issue Goods Receipt

    Goods Issue Purchase Invoice

    Sale Invoice Purchase Credit memo

    Sales Invoice Purchase invoice

    Sales Debit memo Price fixing FI Journals

    LockBox application

    SAP PI

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 19

    Design Approach for MiniOPS Integration with SAP GT

    Option 2: Using JDBC to ABAP Proxy

    SAP GT MiniOPS JDBC Adapter ABAP Proxy

    Sales Deal

    Purchase Deal Stock Shipment

    Merge Direct Shipment Direct Shipment Purchase Invoice

    Sale Invoice Purchase Debit note

    Sales Debit note Purchase Credit note

    Sales Credit note Price fixing

    Futures Processing Journals Negotiation

    Sale Contract Purchase Order Goods Receipt

    Goods Issue Goods Receipt

    Goods Issue Purchase Invoice

    Sale Invoice Purchase Credit memo

    Sales Invoice Purchase invoice

    Sales Debit memo Price fixing FI Journals

    LockBox application

    SAP PI

    Pros: Better error handling mechanism Good for large volume of data Reduction of overhead function calling Can make Synchronous & Asynchronous calls

    Cons Increased effort as a different ABAP Proxy has to be programmed for each interface

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc. 20

    Design Approach for MiniOPS Integration with SAP GT

    Option 3: Using JDBC to RFC Adapter

    SAP GT MiniOPS JDBC Adapter RFC Adapter

    Sales Deal

    Purchase Deal Stock Shipment

    Merge Direct Shipment Direct Shipment Purchase Invoice

    Sale Invoice Purchase Debit note

    Sales Debit note Purchase Credit note

    Sales Credit note Price fixing

    Futures Processing Journals Negotiation

    Sale Contract Purchase Order Goods Receipt

    Goods Issue Goods Receipt

    Goods Issue Purchase Invoice

    Sale Invoice Purchase Credit memo

    Sales Invoice Purchase invoice

    Sales Debit memo Price fixing FI Journals

    LockBox application

    SAP PI

    Pros: Avoid making multiple calls to the same BAPI / RFC, rather have wrapper BAPI and send all records in one time RFC/BAPI support BE (Best Effort) when used synchronously.

    Cons Not Good for Large Volume of data RFC or BAPI has its own overhead of function call Not advisable for Asynchronous communication

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 21

    Design Approach for MiniOPS Integration with SAP GT

    Option Analysis and Recommended Option

    Based on Efforts Comparison vs. Technical trade off

    Options Detail Efforts Complexity Flexibility /Scalability

    Limitations

    Option1 IDOC Adapter

    Option2 ABAP proxy

    Option3 RFC Adapter

    Our Recommendation OPTION 1:JDBC to IDOC Adapter would suite for MM/SD/FI/GL related Transactions for OPS / OFS system Integration with SAP GT / QC Systems

    Note: As we are using standard IDOC Contents

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 22

    Error Handling and Alert Notification

    List of Different Errors that can be handled in SAP PI both Integration Engine (IE) and Advanced Adapter Engine (AAE) as categorized below

    1. Business Error 2. Technical Error 3. Miscellaneous Error

    Alert Notification

    a) In case, If there is a problem in handling MM/SD/FI/GL related Transactions in PI, then it needs to be flagged so a business user / Group Distribution list is alerted.

    b) E-Mail Notifications can be sent accordingly if PI Mapping fails or Connectivity fails or any other problems.

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 23

    Plan and Resource Loading

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 24

    OLAM Interfaces Estimation-1

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 25

    OLAM Interface Estimation - 2

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 26

    Key Expectations from OLAM

    Phase Expected activities from OLAM

    Initiate

    Arranging development systems and environment for development Creating user id with authorizations and providing the user ids to on-site / Offshore teams Creating User credentials in Oracle DB for both OPS and OFS system along with JDBC drivers details

    Technical Design & Build

    Ensuring availability of concerned teams for review, approval and sign-off on technical design documents Coordinate any development/technical object identification in PI Configure Alert Categories and Alert Rules for both Integration Engine and Adapter Engine Message failures

    Testing

    Review and Approve test cases Participate if required in Actual Testing Coordination with other concerned teams(BASIS/OPS and OFS DBA Team) along with Functional Teams too

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 27

    SOA Foundation Capability

    High volume and reliable message support

    Service mediation Capability

    Protocol Translation Capability

    Message Routing Capability

    Message Transformation Capability

    Security Reliable Messaging Monitoring &

    Administration Tool

    B2B Add-ons Capability for EDI/RNIF/CIDX

    messages

    Strong BPM and Process Orchestration capability

    PI Implementation & Consulting PI AMS service PI Upgrade Service PI Migration service

    PI Assessment and Roadmap Rapid Development service B2B Add-ons service EDI Factory service

    Size & Scale : Multiple SAP PI Experts (Architects, Technical Experts, and Technical Consultants)

    Readiness : Over 10 ready apps ready to be customized per customer needs

    Verticals : Aerospace, CPG, Manufacturing, High Tech and Public sector

    LOB : Retails, Pharmaceuticals, Aerospace, Oil & Gas, Telecommunication

    Platform : Classical Swing client, Eclipse based NWDS client

    Key Clients: Hospira, REI, Palo Alto Networks, Orion Carbons, T-Mobile

    Services

    NTTDATA SAP Process Integration Practice Overview

    NTT DATAs approach on SAP Process Integration (SAP PI) that provides Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) foundation capabilities for SAP customers. SAP PI is an integration platform that provides seamless integration between SAP and non-SAP applications within the

    organization (A2A) as well as outside the organization boundary (B2B). The enterprise services bus performance of SAP PI is specifically

    tuned for a high-volume and reliable exchange of information across distributed business applications. SAP PI offers all functions of an ESB

    Overview

    Unique Capabilities

    Highlights

    PI COE

    SAP PI 7.31 Certified Consultants Pool

    15% Architectural Capability

    SCN Contributions Silver & Bronze contributors

    SAP PI 7.31 Ramp up Partner Testing

    PI EDI Offerings

    EDI Legacy / subsystem Migration to PI

    PI EDI Implementation

    PI EDI AMS Services

    PI RNIF Offerings

    RNIF Legacy / subsystem Migration to PI

    PI RNIF Implementation

    PI RNIF Services

    PI Integration Factory

    Rapid Delivery of Enterprise Services (RADES)

    Accelerated Mappings

  • 28 Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    NTTDATA SAP PI Case Studies

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    29

    Hospira Phoenix Case Study

    Scope & Objectives Business Challenges

    & Learning Solution Values Added

    Challenges Mapping of inventory materials

    to saleable material drug, pumps or service items.

    Executing multiple sub projects within Phoenix, without affecting one another.

    IT Challenges Use of a enterprise wide

    Interfacing mechanism(IDOC) for master data to cater to varying needs of different Application systems.

    Setting up of new processes around development using new Information technology areas like SAP PI and JAVA.

    Learning Maintenance consistence of

    master data changes across multiple options.

    Solution Migration of AHA functionality

    to SAP with added features and functionalities

    Interface to Model N to get the real time pricing

    Integrate web services provided by Model N job framework with AUTOSYS system, using SAP PI.

    Interface various dataflows that support OTC and FI processes between the various application systems.

    Enhance core SAP functionality wherever needed, to support interfaces.

    Value Adds Leverage existing investments

    by integration of Hospiras standard job scheduling tool with the web service based job scheduling tool of Model N.

    Flexible design & configuration to allow switch over when needed

    Enhanced INet Interface to create any type of sales documents

    Streamlining and classification of the material master data based on material groups.

    Enabling hub and spoke model using a unified integration middleware system (SAP PI) to leverage the benefits offered by the model.

    Objectives Replace Contract Administration(CAS),

    Chargeback System & Replace Delphi system

    Migrate AHA functionality to SAP ECC from Delphi.

    Synygy to be the new Sales Performance Management system

    Scope Develop Interfaces between ECC, Model

    N, Synygy SFDC staging , BW and other systems using SAP PI/XI

    Master Data changes flow mutually between SAP, Model N and other systems to sync them up.

    Business Value Simplify contracting processes and

    reduce/eliminate manual efforts Write better contracts that deliver margin

    improvement Reduce time the sales rep spends in

    contract activities Reduce cycle time from initial customer

    contact through signed contract Enforce contract compliance

    commitments Reduce risk profile related to government

    reporting Reduce application support activities and

    costs

  • Scope & Objectives Business Challenges

    & Learning Solution Values Added

    Challenges POS Transactions containing

    cash & credit Sales information

    segregate & channelled to different SAP systems. Configuration of IDOC_AAE

    adapter with NWA activities so

    as to accomplish full fledged

    PI7.3 Enhancements provided by SAP. Testing of all 14 outbound and

    2 Inbound interfaces very integral part of upgrade project Learning Learnt PI7.3 implementation

    and required nwa activities needed for PI7.3 Faced some new issues and

    quickly we are working with

    SAP through Note

    implementation and trace capturing.

    Solution Usage of IDOC instead of

    IDOC_AAE adapter as

    workaround to meet the

    requirements in time.

    Learnt new monitoring ways

    instead of RWB in PI7.3 and

    creating the requirements

    myself in the absence of Net

    Weaver Admins and Basis for PI pre configuration activities.

    Value Adds Developed one interface

    instead of 7 for promotions based on discount types. Cutting Edge PI 7.3 features

    deployment and benefiting

    customer with all the

    functionality & providing

    customer training by giving hands-on workshop training.

    Objectives Replacement of Retails TIMS system with SAP ISRetail POS SAP POS will be used for

    sales activities & should record

    daily transactions to POSDM. Using PI inbound interface. Sap will be generating Article,

    Merchandise category, Sales,

    Seasons, Discounts,

    Promotion, employee related

    master data which need to be

    updated in POS system through interfaces. Scope Perform POS integration and monitor activities. Complete configuration of PI

    end to end implementations

    and making sure SAP POS

    replace TIMS & fully functional from Business standpoint.

    Harvey Nichols PI 7.31 IS-Retail Implementation for ALFA.

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    31

    T-Mobile Fullerton PI 7.1 Case Study

    Scope & Objectives Business Challenges

    & Learning Solution Values Added

    Challenges PI will receive Employee, Actual

    hrs worked, Org hierarchy, Employee Leave Status, Advice 2 pay ,Deductions data from SAP ECC and AON TBA system.

    PI should read and write the data securely between TMO and AON systems.

    Use of See burger's SFTP adapters for secure data transfer & content conversions.

    Managing single target folder for all the environments.

    Learning Working with Certificates &

    secure connection between B2B

    Learnt methodologies to perform smooth Go-live on time

    Solution Integrating the TMOs SAP HCM system and AONs TBA system using SAP PI 7.11. Develop ABAP client Proxies for outbound messages and ABAP server proxies for Inbound messages. Implementing both Inbound and Outbound interfaces along with content conversions using SEEBURGER-SFTP adapters. Providing alert mechanism for the failed messages.

    Value Adds Direct interaction with AONs legacy system in secured way . Customized Monitoring transaction for the archived and failed messages in PI. Lower memory consumption and performance optimization of cache refresh Continuous enhancements and optimizations

    Objectives Integrating T-mobile SAP

    system with third party non sap system using SAP PI 7.11.

    T-Mobile HR Benefits related data like Employee, Payroll Deduction Data, Actual hours worked ,LSF and ATP need to be update in TMOs vendor FTP system and vice versa.

    TMO vendor is AON-Hewitt and the data needs to be transferred securely between these two networks.

    Scope Integration between TMOs SAP

    HCM system with AONs TBA system.

    Complete configuration check and Testing by using Readiness check document

  • Orion Engineered carbons PI 7.1 EHP 1 Implementation Case Study

    Objectives Business Challenges

    & Learning Solution Value Adds

    Challenges Implementing the Order To Cash

    business interfaces with various Chem eStandard customers using CIDX in SAP PI.

    Implementing EDI Integration for various customers using Seebuger was a big challenge. Each EDI transaction followed a different version of EDI document.

    Testing the EDI and CIDX Interfaces for various business partners.

    Implementing Encryption and decryption of messages for banking interfaces.

    Learning Learnt implementing CIDX

    interfaces Encountered certain new issues

    and resolved them quickly. Performed RCA for frequently occurring issues and fixed them.

    Solution Implemented the Encryption and

    Decryption of messages for banking interfaces using SAP SECURITY ADDON

    Implemented the CIDX (Chemical Industry Data Exchange) Interfaces using CIDX business content and CIDX Adapter.

    Implemented the EDI interfaces using Seeburger and developed custom adapter module for handling free form segments (which were not supported by Seeburgers module). Developed the EDI conversion mappings using Seeburger BIC Mapping Designer tool.

    Value Adds Developed user defined message search solution using which messages can be tracked based on content of payload. For certain critical

    interfaces like Process Order, customers were informed via mail for any failure of process order in SAP PI.

    Objectives Orion Engineered Carbons

    Integration objects are developed in SAP PI 7.1 (EHP 1) system

    Integrating various customers following Chem eStandards with SAP system of Orion.

    Implementing EDI message exchange with various business partners using SAP PI.

    Integrating various database systems with Orions SAP system using SAP PI.

    Integrating web services with Orions SAP system using SAP PI.

    Implementing SFTP transmission along with encryption and decryption of messages for banking interfaces of CITI Bank and JP Morgan using SAP PI.

  • Copyright 2012 NTT DATA Corporation 33

    NTTDATA SAP PI Case Studies - Summary

    Customers Project Type Version Total No of

    systems Environment Team Size

    Hospira Phoenix Implementation PI 7.31 10 BS 5 10

    TMOBILE Fullerton Implementation PI 7.11

    4 BS 3 2

    Hospira HSST Implementation PI 7.31

    7 BS 5 2

    Olympus Up gradation PI 7.31

    5 BS 3 1

    SORRA Implementation PI 7.31

    4 BS 3 2

    Harvey Nichols Implementation PI 7.11

    5 BS 3 2

    ORION Carbon Support PI 7.31

    8 BS 3 3

    Synergy Implementation PI 7.31

    5 BS 3 3

    LSI Logic Support PI 7.1

    4 BS 3 2

  • 34 Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    NTTDATA Customer Footprint

    Upgrades/

    Migrations Implementation

    Support

    We have delivered end-to-end SAP services in most industries.

  • 35 Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.

    Commercials

    NTT DATA's commercial Offer based on proposed scope for Integrating Legacy Systems with SAP is INR 25,00,000 ( Twenty Five Lakhs only) .

  • This document contains confidential Company information. Do not disclose it to third parties without permission from the Company. Copyright 2012 NTT DATA, Inc.