sojom laser welding simulation
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 1/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF
THE TEMPERATURE AND BEAD
PROFILES OF T-JOINT LASER WELDS
16.11.2011 1
N. Siva Shanmugam1*, G. Buvanashekaran2 and K. Sankaranarayanasamy1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology,
Tiruchirappalli – 620 015, Tamil Nadu, India.2Welding Research Institute, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited,
Tiruchirappalli – 620 014, Tamil Nadu, India.
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 2/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 2
The laser welding is a keyhole welding process havingconcentrated heat input. To obtain the required weld profile and
quality of weld, correct process parameters have to be selected.
Laser beam
Keyhole
Base material
Plasma
Melt pool
Input Parameters
Output ParametersBeam power
Welding speed
Beam Angle
Spot Diameter
Exposure time
Bead width
Depth of
penetration
Schematic representation of key hole welding
Laser Beam Welding
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 3/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 3
• The Heat developed during welding process intermittently
interacts with the work piece over very short time intervals,resulting in very rapid heating and cooling cycles.
• The weld bead is the product of a number of overlapping spot
welds, and every point in the weld area experiences a complex
series of thermal cycles during the passage of the welding heat
source.
• This complexity implies that analytical modeling techniques are
almost impossible.
• The Finite Element Modeling, therefore, is the preferred
option, although the analysis requires a very large number of
small time steps.
WHY FEM ?
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 4/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 4
Laser head
Cross jet
Work table
Shielding gas
Exhaust
Fibre Optic
Cable
Cross slide
CCTV
2kW Nd:YAG laser welding system at WRI
Power Source
Computer Numerical Controlled
welding system
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 5/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Material for Experimentation – SS304
The alloy 304 is a general-purpose austenitic stainless steel
The melting point of stainless steel ranges from 1400 to 1455oC.
Chemical Composition of AISI 304 Stainless Steel
16.11.2011 5
Component C Cr Fe Mn Ni P S Si
Wt. % 0.055 18.28 66.34 1.00 8.48 0.029 0.005 0.6
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 6/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 6
Flow Diagram –
Laser Welding
Simulation
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 7/24National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
where(x,y,z) = coordinate system attached to the heat sourceqv = power generation per unit volume in the domain D (W m–3)kx, ky, kz = thermal conductivity in the x, y and z directions (W m–1 K–1)Cp = specific heat capacity (J kg–1 K–1)ρ= density (kg m–3)t = time (s)
vw = velocity of workpiece (m s–1)
z y xq z
T k
z y
T k
y x
T k
x y
T v
t
T C vw p ,,)(
Mathematical Description of the Model
16.11.2011 7
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 8/24National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
2
0
2
0
3exp
r
r QQr
21
22 )( y x r ) /()(*)(0 ieeiee z z z zr r r r
,
Qr is the source intensity,
Q0 is the maximum source intensity,
r e is the (x,y) parameter of Gaussian curve in the upper plane at z=ze,
r i is the (x,y) parameter of Gaussian curve in the lower plane at z=zi .
3D Conical Gaussian heat source model
16.11.2011 8
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 9/24National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Heat Input Calculation
where Qkeyhole is the absorbed laser beam power (75%), r0 is theaverage keyhole radius, H is the plate thickness, r is the currentradius, i.e. the distance from the cone axis and z is the currentdepth.
Where q is the maximum heat flux per unit area and R is theheat source effective radius (R = 2r0, ro is the averagekeyhole radius, about 0.3mm).
Surface
Volume
2
22
0
)(3
exp),( R
y x
q y xq
20
3
R
top
topQ is a power of the plane heat source (25%)
h
ze
hr
Q zq
r r
keyhole1
2)(
2
01
2
0
vq is a Volumetric heat source
h
16.11.2011 9
H. Du, L. Hu, J. Liu and X. Hu, “A study on the metal flow in full penetration laser beam welding for
titanium alloy”, Journal of Computational Materials Science, 29, 2004, pp. 419-427.
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 10/24National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
The initial condition is
The essential boundary condition is
Boundary Conditions
z y xT t z xT ,,,,0, 0
z y xT z y xT ,,0,,, 0
on the boundary S1. This condition prescribes
nodal temperatures at the inlet surface S1.
16.11.2011 10
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 11/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
04
0
4
0
T T T T hq
n
T k n
Boundary Conditions
The natural boundary conditions can be defined by
nk
q
h
0T
where
is thermal conductivity normal to the surface (W/m K)
is prescribed heat flux (W/m2)
(varies with beam power, welding speed and beam incident angle)
is heat transfer coefficient for convection (W/m2 K)
is Stefan-Boltzmann constant for radiation (5.67 x 10 -8 W/m2 K4)
is emissivity
is ambient temperature (K)
on the boundary S2.
16.11.2011 11
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 12/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Heat Input to FEM A three Dimensional Conical Gaussian Heat
Source Model
T - Joint
16.11.2011 12
S S D
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 13/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Thermal material properties namely conductivity, specific heat, density are
temperature dependent
The latent heat of fusion is considered by the enthalpy of material for the
calculation of phase change The physical phenomena like viscous fore, buoyancy force, convective melt
flow and Marangoni effects are neglected
It is also assumed that, the absorbed laser energy is considered as 69.3% of
the laser power as proposed by Xie and Kar.
The assumptions made in this investigation are:
16.11.2011 13Ref: Xie J, Kar A. Laser Welding of Thin Sheet Steel with Surface Oxidation. Welding ResearchSupplement 1999; 78:343s – 348s
N Si Sh D f M h i l E i i
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 14/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 14
Sl.No.
BeamPower
(BP), Watts
Weldingspeed(WS),
mm/min
BeamAngle
(BA), deg.Focal Length
(F), mm
1 1000 500 30
1602 1250 600 45
3 1500 700 60
Laser Welding Parameters
Three input laser parameters namely laser beam power, welding speed and
beam incident angle varied at three levels resulting in 33 = 27 welding trials.
The experimental trials are conducted based on full factorial design.
N Si Sh D t t f M h i l E i i
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 15/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 15
Schematic representation of laser welding process for T-joint specimen
N Si Sh D t t f M h i l E i i
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 16/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 16
T-joint laser weld
Beam power -1250 W, welding speed 500 mm/min, beam angle 30o
N Si a Shanm gam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 17/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 17
Experimental Work
Cross sectional views of 1.6 mm thick T joint specimen welded with (a)
60o, (b) 30o and (c) 45o beam angles on both sides of the stiffener
Beam power 1250 W,
welding speed 500 mm/min
Partial Penetration
Partial Penetration
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 18/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 18
Physical Model of T-joint configuration
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 19/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Finite Element Model
2D
3D
T Joint
16.11.2011 19
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 20/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 20
The temperature distribution during laser welding process at various time steps
Beam power -1250 W, welding speed 500 mm/min, beam angle 30o
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 21/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Weld pool shape between (a) Experimental investigation and
(b) finite element simulation
(a) (b)
Comparison Exp. Vs. FEM
T Joint
16.11.2011 21
Beam power -1250 W,
welding speed 500 mm/min
beam angle 30o
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 22/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
60o 45o
30o
Beam power - 1250 W,
welding speed - 500 mm/min
Bead Shape
BA - 60o BA - 45o
BA - 30o
T Joint
16.11.2011 22
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering
8/3/2019 SOJOM Laser Welding Simulation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sojom-laser-welding-simulation 23/24
National Institute of Technology, Trichy
N. Siva Shanmugam, Department of Mechanical Engineering
16.11.2011 23
•
Proper fusion of base material (horizontal and vertical sheets) and tiebetween the bead profiles is achieved when the laser system is operatedwith 30o beam incident angle,1250 W beam power and 500 mm/min.welding speed.
• A partial penetration is established in the macro graph, when the
beam angle is maintained at 60o
• For the beam angle of 45o, proper fusion of base material is achievedbetween the horizontal and vertical sheets, but there is no tie betweenthe resulting bead profiles
• A series of experiments have been conducted to verify the finiteelement simulation results.
• Comparison of experimental and simulation results reveals a verygood correlation for depth of penetration and bead width values with astandard error of 2.78% and 1.9%, respectively
Based on the results of this investigation, the following conclusionsare made:
CONCLUSIONS
N Siva Shanmugam Department of Mechanical Engineering