soil mech

12
NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 1 Module 6 EVALUATION OF SOIL SETTLEMENT (Lectures 35 to 40) Topics 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT 1.2.1 Immediate Settlement from Theory of Elasticity Settlement due to a concentrated point load at the surface Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible circular area Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible rectangular area Settlement of a flexible load area on an elastic layer of finite thickness 1.2.2 Settlement of rigid footings 1.2.3 Determination of Youngโ€™s Modulus 1.2.4 Settlement Prediction in Sand by Empirical Correlation 1.2.5 Calculation of Immediate Settlement in Granular Soil Using Simplified Strain Influence Factor 1.3 PRIMARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT 1.3.1 One-Dimensional Consolidation Settlement Calculation Method A Method B 1.3.2 Skempton-Bjerrum Modification for Calculation of Consolidation Settlement 1.3.3 Settlement of Overconsolidated Clays 1.3.4 Precompression for Improving Foundation Soils 1.4 SECONDARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT 1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION 1.5.1 Definition of Stress Path

Upload: sharmi1990

Post on 22-Oct-2015

11 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

notes

TRANSCRIPT

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 1

Module 6

EVALUATION OF SOIL SETTLEMENT (Lectures 35 to 40)

Topics

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.2 IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT

1.2.1 Immediate Settlement from Theory of Elasticity

Settlement due to a concentrated point load at the surface

Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible circular area

Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible rectangular

area

Settlement of a flexible load area on an elastic layer of finite thickness

1.2.2 Settlement of rigid footings

1.2.3 Determination of Youngโ€™s Modulus

1.2.4 Settlement Prediction in Sand by Empirical Correlation

1.2.5 Calculation of Immediate Settlement in Granular Soil Using Simplified

Strain Influence Factor

1.3 PRIMARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT

1.3.1 One-Dimensional Consolidation Settlement Calculation

Method A

Method B

1.3.2 Skempton-Bjerrum Modification for Calculation of Consolidation

Settlement

1.3.3 Settlement of Overconsolidated Clays

1.3.4 Precompression for Improving Foundation Soils

1.4 SECONDARY CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT

1.5 STRESS-PATH METHOD OF SETTLEMENT CALCULATION

1.5.1 Definition of Stress Path

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 2

1.5.2 Stress and Strain Path for Consolidated Undrained Undrained Triaxial

Tests

1.5.3 Calculation of Settlement from Stress Point

PROBLEMS

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 3

Chapter 6

Lecture 35

Evaluation of Soil Settlement -1

Topics

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.2 IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT

1.2.1 Immediate Settlement from Theory of Elasticity

Settlement due to a concentrated point load at the surface

Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible circular area

Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible rectangular

area

Summary of elastic settlement at the ground surface (z = 0) due to

uniformly distributed vertical loads on flexible areas

Settlement of a flexible load area on an elastic layer of finite thickness

1.1 INTRODUCTION

The increase of stress in soil layers due to the load imposed by various structures at the foundation level will

always be accompanied by some strain, which will result in the settlement of the structures. The various

aspects of settlement calculation are analyzed in this chapter.

In general, the total settlement S of a foundation can be given as

๐‘† = ๐‘†๐‘’ + ๐‘†๐‘ + ๐‘†๐‘  (1)

Where

๐‘†๐‘’ = Immediate settlement

๐‘†๐‘ = Primary consolidation settlement

๐‘†๐‘  = Secondary consolidation settlement

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 4

The immediate settlement is sometimes referred to as the elastic settlement. In granular soils this is the

predominant part of the settlement, whereas in saturated inorganic silts and clays the primary consolidation

settlement probably predominates. The secondary consolidation settlement forms the major part of the total

settlement in highly organic soils and peats.

1.2 IMMEDIATE SETTLEMENT

1.2.1 Immediate Settlement from Theory of Elasticity

Settlement due to a concentrated point load at the surface

For elastic settlement due to a concentrated point load (figure 1), the strain at a depth z can be given in

cylindrical coordinates, by

Figure 1 Elastic settlement due to a concentrated point load

๐‘’๐‘ง =1

๐ธ[๐œŽ๐‘ง โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ ๐œŽ๐‘Ÿ + ๐œŽ๐œƒ ] (2)

Where E is the Youngโ€™s modulus of the soil. The expressions for ๐œŽ๐‘ง ,๐œŽ๐‘Ÿ , and ๐œŽ๐œƒ are given in equations (53 to

55 from chapter 3), respectively. Substitution of these in equation (2) and simplification yields

๐œ–๐‘ง =๐‘„

2๐œ‹๐ธ

3(1+๐‘ฃ)๐‘Ÿ2๐‘ง

(๐‘Ÿ2+๐‘ง2)5/2 โˆ’3+๐‘ฃ 1โˆ’2๐‘ฃ ๐‘ง

(๐‘Ÿ2+๐‘ง2)3/2 (3)

The settlement at a depth z can be found by integration equatin (3):

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐œ–๐‘ง ๐‘‘๐‘ง =๐‘„

2๐œ‹๐ธ

(1+๐‘ฃ)๐‘ง2

(๐‘Ÿ2+๐‘ง2)3/2 +2 1โˆ’๐‘ฃ2

(๐‘Ÿ2+๐‘ง2)1/2

The settlement at the surface can be evaluated by putting z = 0 in the above equation:

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 5

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’ =๐‘„

๐œ‹๐ธ๐‘Ÿ(1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ2) (4)

Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible circular area

The elastic settlement due to a uniformly loaded circular area (figure 2) can be determined by using the

same procedure as discussed for a point load, which involves determination of the strain ๐œ–๐‘ง from the

equation and determination of the settlement by integration with respect to z.

Figure 2 Elastic settlement due to a uniformly loaded circular area

๐œ–๐‘ง =1

๐ธ[๐œŽ๐‘ง โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ(๐œŽ๐‘Ÿ + ๐œŽ๐œƒ)

Substitution of the relation for ๐œŽ๐‘ง ,๐œŽ๐‘Ÿ , and ๐œŽ๐œƒ in the preceding equation for strain and simplification gives

(Ahlvin and Ulery, 1962) where q is the load per unit area. Aโ€™ and Bโ€™ are nondimensional and are functions

of z/b and s/b; their values are given in table 7 and 8 in chapter 3.

๐œ–๐‘ง = ๐‘ž1+๐‘ฃ

๐ธ[ 1 โˆ’ 2๐‘ฃ ๐ดโ€ฒ + ๐ตโ€ฒ ] (5)

The vertical deflection at a depth z can be obtained by integration of equation 6 as where ๐ผ1 = ๐ดโ€ฒ and b is the

radius of the circular loaded area. The numerical values of ๐ผ2 (which is a function of z/b and s/b) are given in

table 1.

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘ž1+๐‘ฃ

๐ธ๐‘

๐‘ง

๐‘๐ผ1 + (1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ)๐ผ2 (6)

From equation (6) it follows that the settlement at the surface (i. e. , at z = 0) is

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘ž๐‘1โˆ’๐‘ฃ2

๐ธ๐ผ2 (7)

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 6

The term ๐ผ2 in equation (7) is usually referred to as the influence number. For saturated clays, we may

assume ๐‘ฃ = 0.5. so, at the center of the loaded area (i. e. , s/b = 0), ๐ผ2 = 2 and

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘Ÿ =1.5๐‘ž๐‘

๐ธ=

0.75๐‘ž๐ต

๐ธ (8)

Table 1 Values of ๐‘ฐ๐Ÿ ๐‘ /๐‘

๐‘ง/๐‘ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.5 2

0 2.0 1.97987 1.91751 1.80575 1.62553 1.27319 .93676 .71185 .51671

0.1 1.80998 1.79018 1.72886 1.61961 1.44711 1.18107 .92670 .70888 .51627 0.2 1.63961 1.62068 1.56242 1.46001 1.30614 1.09996 .90098 .70074 .51382

0.3 1.48806 1.470044 1.40979 1.32442 1.19210 1.02740 .86726 .68823 .50966 0.4 1.35407 1.33802 1.28963 1.20822 1.09555 .96202 .83042 .67238 .50412

0.5 1.23607 1.22176 1.17894 1.10830 1.01312 .90298 .79308 .65429 .49728

0.6 1.13238 1.11998 1.08350 1.02154 .94120 .84917 .75653 .63469

0.7 1.04131 1.03037 .99794 .91049 .87742 .80030 .72143 .61442 .48061

0.8 .96125 .95175 .92386 .87928 .82136 .75571 .68809 .59398

0.9 .89072 .88251 .85856 .82616 .77950 .71495 .65677 .57361 1 .82843 .85005 .80465 .76809 .72587 .67769 .62701 .55364 .45122

1.2 .72410 .71882 .70370 .67937 .64814 .61187 .57329 .51552 .43013

1.5 .60555 ,60233 .57246 .57633 .55559 .53138 .50496 .46379 .39872 2 .47214 .47022 .44512 .45656 .44502 .43202 .41702 .39242 .35054

2.5 .38518 ,38403 .38098 .37608 .36940 .36155 .35243 .33698 .30913

3 .32457 .32403 .32184 .31887 .31464 .30969 .30381 .29364 .27453 4 .24620 .24588 .24820 .25128 .24168 .23932 .23668 .23164 .22188

5 .19805 .19785 .19455 .18450

6 .16554 .16326 .15750 7 .14217 .14077 .13699

8 .12448 .12352 .12112

9 .11079 .10989 .10854 10 .09900 .09820

After Ahlvin and Ulery (1962)

where ๐ต = 2๐‘ is the diameter of the loaded area.

At the edge of the loaded area (๐‘–. ๐‘’. , ๐‘ง/๐‘ = 0and s/b = 1), I2 = 1.27 and

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’ ๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘”๐‘’ = 1.27 0.75 ๐‘ž๐‘

๐ธ= 0.95

๐‘ž๐‘

๐ธ=

0.475๐‘ž๐ต

๐ธ (9)

The average surface settlement is

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’, ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’ = 0.85๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’, ๐‘๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘Ÿ) (10)

Settlement at the surface due to a uniformly loaded flexible rectangular area

The elastic deformation in the vertical direction at the corner of a uniformly loaded rectangular area of size

๐ฟ ร— ๐ต can be obtained by proper integration of the expression for strain. The deformation at a depth z below

the corner of the rectangular area can be expressed in the form (Harr, 1966) ๐‘ /๐‘

๐‘ง/๐‘ 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 12 14

0 .33815 .25200 .20045 .16626 .14315 .12576 .09918 .08346 .07023

0.1 .33794 .25184 .20081

0.2 .33726 .25162 .20072 .16688 .14288 .12512 0.3 .33638 .25124

0.4

0.5 .33293 .24996 .19982 .16668 .14273 .12493 .09996 .08295 .07123 0.6

0.7

0.8 0.9

1 .31877 .24386 .19673 .16516 .14182 .12394 .09952 .08292 .07104

1.2 .31162 .24070 .19520 .16369 .14099 .12350 1.5 .29945 .23495 ..19053 .16199 .14058 .12281 .09876 .08270 .07064

2 .27740 .22418 .18618 .15846 .13762 .12124 .09792 .08196 .07026

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 7

2.5 .25550 .21208 .17898 .15395 .13463 .11928 .09700 .08115 .06980

3 .23487 .19977 .17154 .14919 .13119 .11694 .09558 .08061 .06897

4 .19908 .17640 .15596 .13864 .12396 .11172 .09300 .07864 .06848 5 .17080 .15575 .14130 .12785 .11615 .10585 .08915 .07675 .06695

6 .14868 .13842 .12792 .11778 .10836 .09990 .08562 .07452 .06522

7 .13097 .12404 .11620 .10843 .10101 .09387 .08197 .07210 .06377 8 .11680 .11176 .10600 .09976 .09400 .08848 .07800 .06928 .06200

9 .10548 .10161 .09702 .09234 .08784 .08298 .07407 .06678 .05976

10 .09510 .09290 .08980 .08300 .08180 .07710

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘›๐‘’๐‘Ÿ =๐‘ž๐ต

2๐ธ(1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ2) ๐ผ3 โˆ’

1โˆ’2๐‘ฃ

1โˆ’๐‘ฃ ๐ผ4 (11)

Where ๐ผ3 =1

๐œ‹ ๐ผ๐‘›

1+๐‘š12+๐‘›1

2+๐‘š1

1+๐‘š12+๐‘›1

2โˆ’๐‘š1

+ ๐‘š ๐ผ๐‘› 1+๐‘š1

2+๐‘›12+1

1+๐‘š12+๐‘›1

2โˆ’1

(12)

๐ผ4 =๐‘›1

๐œ‹๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘›โˆ’1

๐‘š1

๐‘›1 1+๐‘š12+๐‘›1

2 (13)

๐‘š1 =๐ฟ

๐ต (14)

๐‘›1 =๐‘ง

๐ต (15)

Values of ๐ผ3 and I4 are given in table 2.

For elastic surface settlement at the corner of a rectangular area, substituting ๐‘ง/๐‘ = ๐‘›1 = 0 in equation (11)

and make the necessary calculations; thus,

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘›๐‘’๐‘Ÿ =๐‘ž๐ต

2๐ธ(1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ2)๐ผ3 (16)

The settlement at the surface for the center of a rectangular area (figure 3) can be found by adding the

settlement for the corner of four rectangular areas of dimension ๐ฟ/2 ร— ๐ต/2. Thus, from equation (11),

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 8

Figure 3 Determination of settlement at the center of a rectangular area of dimensions ๐ฟ ร— ๐ต

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘Ÿ = 4 ๐‘ž(๐ต/2)

2๐ธ (1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ2)๐ผ3 =

๐‘ž๐ต

๐ธ(1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ2)๐ผ3 (17)

The average surface settlement can be obtained as

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’, ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’ = 0.848๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ก๐‘’๐‘Ÿ, ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘’) (18)

Summary of elastic settlement at the ground surface (z = 0) due to uniformly

distributed vertical loads on flexible areas

For circular areas:

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘ž๐ต 1โˆ’๐‘ฃ2

2๐ธ ๐ผ2

Where

๐ต =Diameter of circular loaded area

๐ผ2 = 2 (at center)

๐ผ2 = 1.27(at edge)

๐ผ2 = 0.85 ร— 2 = 1.7(average)

For rectangular areas, on the basic equations (16) to (18) we can write

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘ž๐ต

๐ธ(1 โˆ’ ๐‘ฃ2) ๐ผ5 (19)

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 9

Where

๐ผ5 = ๐ผ3(at center)

๐ผ5 = 1

2๐ผ3(at edge)

๐ผ5 โ‰ˆ 0.848๐ผ3(average)

Table 3 gives the values of ๐ผ5 for various ๐ฟ/๐ต ratios.

Settlement of a flexible load area on an elastic layer of finite thickness

For the settlement calculation, it was assumed that the elastic soil layer extends to an infinite depth.

However, if the elastic soil layer is underlain by a rigid incompressible base at a depth H (figure 4), the

settlement can be approximately calculated as

๐‘†๐‘’ = ๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘ง=0) โˆ’ ๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘ง=๐ป) (20)

Figure 4 Flexible loaded area over an elastic soil layer of finite thickness

Where ๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘ง=0) and ๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘ง=๐ป)are the settlements at the surface and at z = H, respectively.

Foundations are almost never placed at the ground surface, but at some depth ๐ท๐‘“ (figure 5). Hence, a

correction needs to be applied to the settlement values calculated on the assumption that the load is applied

at the ground surface. Fox (1948) proposed a correction factor for this which is a function of ๐ท๐‘“/๐ต, ๐ฟ/๐ต and

Poissonโ€™s ratio v. thus,

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 10

Figure 5 Average immediate settlement for a flexible rectangular loaded area located at a depth ๐ท๐‘“ from the

ground surface

๐‘†โ€ฒ๐‘’ ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’ = ๐ผ6๐‘†๐‘’(๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’) (21)

Where

๐ผ6 = correction factor for foundation depth, ๐ท๐‘“

๐‘†โ€ฒ๐‘’ = corrected elastic settlement of foundation

๐‘†๐‘’ = elastic settlement of foundation calculated on assumption that load is applied at ground surface

By computer programming of the equation proposed by Fox, Bowles (1977) obtained the values of ๐ผ6 for

various values of ๐ท๐‘“/๐ต length-to-width ratio of the foundation, and Poissonโ€™s ratio of the soil layer. These

values are shown in bfigure 6.

Table 3 Values of ๐‘ฐ๐Ÿ“ ๐ผ5

๐ฟ/๐ต Center Corner Average

1 1.122 0.561 0.951 2 1.532 0.766 1.299

3 1.783 0.892 1.512

5 2.105 1.053 1.785 10 2.544 1.272 2.157

20 2.985 1.493 2.531 50 3.568 1.784 3.026

100 4.010 2.005 3.400

Janbu et al, (1956) proposed a generalized equation for average immediate settlement for uniformly loaded

flexible footings in the form

๐‘†๐‘’ ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘”๐‘’ = ๐œ‡1๐œ‡0๐‘ž๐ต

๐ธ (for๐‘ฃ = 0.5) (22)

Where

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 11

๐œ‡1 = Correction factor for finite thickness of elastic soil layer, H, as shown in figure 5.

๐œ‡0 = Correction factor for depth of embankment of footing, ๐ท๐‘“ , as shown in figure 5.

๐ต = Width of rectangular loaded area of diameter of circular loaded area

Christian and Carrier (1978) made a critical evaluation of equation (22), the details of which will not be

presented here. However, they suggested that for ๐‘ฃ = 0.5, equation (22) could be retained for immediate

settlement calculations with a modification of the values of ๐œ‡1and ฮผ2. The modified values of ๐œ‡1 are based

on the work of Groud (1972) and those for ๐œ‡0 are based on the work of Burland (1970). These are shown in

figure 7.. Christian and Carrier inferred that these values are generally adequate for circular and rectangular

footings.

Figure 6 Correction factor for the depth of embedment of the foundation. (Bowles 1977)

Figure 7 Improved chart for use in equation (22). (After Christian and Carrier 1978)

NPTEL- Advanced Geotechnical Engineering

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 12

Another general method for estimation of immediate settlement is to divide the underlying soil into ๐“ƒ layers

of finite thicknesses (figure 5). It the strain at the middle of each layer can be calculated. The total

immediate settlement can be obtained as where โˆ†๐‘ง(๐‘–) is the thickness of the ๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘• layer and ๐œ–๐‘ง(๐‘–) is the vertical

strain at the middle of the ๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘• layer.

๐‘†๐‘’ = โˆ†๐‘ง(๐‘–)๐œ–๐‘ง(๐‘–)๐‘–=๐‘›๐‘–=1 (23)

The method of using equation (23) is demonstrated in example 2.