sodqqlqj wrurqwr·v grzqwrzq · 400,000 creative 450,000 500,000 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986...
TRANSCRIPT
planning toronto’s downtown
Parks and Public Realm Plan – Request for Proposals Information Meeting Andrew Farncombe, Project Manager August 19, 2015
Where will future growth be accommodated? What physical and social infrastructure will we need, where will it go, how will we secure it?
Keeping Downtown a great place
to live, work, learn and play
BA
TH
UR
ST
S
T
Growth
TORONTO’S CHANGING DOWNTOWN
DOWNTOWN’S CHANGING SKYLINE 2005
DOWNTOWN’S CHANGING SKYLINE 2014 – Existing and Anticipated
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
TD TOWERS COMPLETED
OFFICE BOOM
RECESSION GROWTH OF DOT.COM &
CREATIVE SECTOR
START OF OFFICE BOOM
REGENT PARK
COMPLETION
ST.
JAMESTOWN
OPENING CENTRAL
AREA PLAN
ST.
LAWRENCE
NEIGHBOURHOOD
“KINGS
SECONDARY
PLANS”
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
0
EMPLOYMENT
277,000 > 433,800
POPULATION
124,000 > 199,000
CONDO
BOOM
A MIX OF HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL USES A planning principle that has shaped our Downtown
LIVING DOWNTOWN Downtown’s residential population doubled in 40 years
1976 2015
102,299
215,000
(estimated)
NET GROWTH PERCENT GROWTH
112,000+ 110%
GROWTH RATES Downtown is growing 4X faster than the City as a whole
1991 - 1996 1996 - 2001 2001 - 2006 2006 - 2011
5%
1%
4.5%
8%
7%
10%
18%
14%
16%
17%
13%
CITY OF
TORONTO
DOWNTOWN
REST OF GTA
4%
18%
KING-SPADINA
+86%
WATERFRONT WEST
+105%
WATERFRONT CENTRAL
+68%
FINANCIAL DISTRICT
+18%
KING-PARLIAMENT
+31%
ST. LAWRENCE- DISTILLERY
+8%
MOSS PARK
- 7%
REGENT PARK
- 4%
CHURCH-YONGE
+15%
BAY CORRIDOR
+27%
KENSINGTON - CHINATOWN
+8%
UFT
+5%
ST. JAMESTOWN
+7%
CABBAGETOWN
+1%
YORKVILLE
+2% ANNEX
+6%
DOWNTOWN
NEIGHBOURHOOD GROWTH Residential Growth 2006-2011
Growth is not uniform across the Downtown
DIVERSE NEIGHBOURHOODS Downtown includes different types of neighbourhoods
New High-rise Neighbourhoods Older Apartment Neighbourhoods
Main-street Neighbourhoods Low-rise Neighbourhoods
DOWNTOWN COMMUTERS AND VISITORS Daytime vs. Night time Population
245,000 + Night time Population
residents
overnight visitors
Source: TTS Survey, TES, Statistics Canada, RTO5 Statistics 2012
830,000 + People Downtown every day residents
commuting workers
commuting students
day trips
overnight visitors
ETOBICOKE SCARBOROUGH DOWNTOWN
70%
66%
50%
60%
25%
26%
32%
39% 36%
34%
3% 3%
11%
4%
41%
SOUTH OF 401 NORTH OF 401
MOST DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS WALK, CYCLE OR USE TRANSIT Commuting by Mode of Travel 2011
Downtown
ANTICIPATING MORE GROWTH
DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE 2003 to 2013
DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE 2003 to 2013
STUDY OVERVIEW TOcore
STUDY GOALS
Parks and Public Realm • Complete Street Guidelines
• Outdoor Café Design Guidelines • Toronto 360 Wayfinding
Strategy
Transportation • SmartTrack & Relief Line Assessments
• Bikeway Network • Gardiner East EA
• Feeling Congested? •Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Review
•King Street Operations Study
Community Services and Facilities • Recreation Facilities Master Plan
• Children’s Services Service Planning
• George Street Revitalization
Water and Energy • Central Toronto Integrated
Regional Resource Plan • Waterfront Servicing Master Plan EA Review
Planning Framework • Ongoing Local Planning Studies
•City-wide Planning Policy Reviews • Official Plan Review
• Heritage Conservation District Studies • Growing Conversations
ALIGNED INITIATIVES
TOcore PHASES
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT and ROLLING IMPLEMENTATION
ELEMENTS OF ENGAGEMENT
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
STAKEHOLDER FOCUS GROUPS
INTERACTIVE ONLINE INPUT
TRADESHOW INTERACTIVE OPEN HOUSE
WORKSHOPS
STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETINGS
PLANNERS IN PUBLIC SPACES
YOUTH OUTREACH PILOT
(Growing Conversations)
SOCIAL MEDIA STRATEGY
Parks
AND
Public Realm PLAN
TOcore will develop a parks and public realm plan for Downtown to improve the quality and connectivity of public spaces, and identify parkland improvement and acquisition priorities within an intensifying core.
PARKS AND PUBLIC REALM Parks, squares, streets, laneways,
paths, ravines, school yards, POPs
and other open spaces
TOcore will develop a Downtown transportation strategy that prioritizes walking, cycling and transit and identifies networks and other improvements to increase mobility for the growing number of people living, working and visiting Downtown.
TRANSPORTATION Surface transit, walking,
cycling
ELEMENTS OF THE PUBLIC REALM
STREETS &
LANEWAYS PARKS
CYCLING
NETWORKS
STREET
TREES
POPS
SQUARES
SIDEWALKS
Towards a integrated
network
Intensifying residential fabric, growing workforce and more visitors Public realm as outdoor ‘living room’ Intensity of use: parks, squares, streets Balancing the needs of different users Securing new parks in a mature urban fabric Trees under stress Accommodating pedestrian flows and sidewalk amenities
TRENDS AND CHALLENGES
Acquiring new parks and squares and improving the ones we have (quantity vs. quality) Designing our streets for people: walking and lingering Building Toronto’s cycling network and expanding bike parking Making connections: a network of green corridors and great streets linking parks and open spaces Improving accessibility to parks, ravines and the islands bordering Downtown Protecting and growing the urban forest Reinforcing our retail main streets and surface transit routes Expanding the underground PATH
OPPORTUNITIES
Transforming our Downtown: bold and compelling vision, big moves, key strategies Putting public life, place-making and active mobility at the forefront of long-term planning for
Downtown Looking at the Downtown’s public realm in a holistic way, recognizing the challenges of a mature
urban fabric Engaging the public in new and meaningful ways A plan that provides clear, tangible direction to leverage our existing great public spaces through strategic capital improvements
PRINCIPLES
1. Work program (inception) • Staff workshop • Public space / public life study design • Public engagement strategy
2. Background & Analysis • Context, history + existing conditions • Public space analysis • Best practices • Active transportation analysis • Downtown park provision assessment • Street trees / analysis • Public engagement
3. Public Life Study • Behavioral mapping • Intercept surveys • Design recommendations
ACTIVITY COMPONENTS
4. Vision, Guiding Principles, Concept Plan and Priorities • Initial vision + guiding principles • Initial concept plan • Organizing elements • Placemaking opportunities + priorities • Draft ‘big moves’ and ‘key strategies • Public engagement
5. Parks and Public Realm Plan • Vision • Concept plan • Big moves • Key strategies under each big move • Public engagement 6. Implementation Strategy • Prioritizing and sequencing strategies • Quick starts • Partnerships • Risks + mitigation • Policy changes
ACTIVITY COMPONENTS (continued)
Follow “Proposal Content” guidelines -- Section 5.3 Note that study area includes Toronto Island Parks and should include consideration of adjacent areas – Section 3.1 Factor in that public engagement is cross-cutting Take into consideration data to be provided by the City – Appendix G (compendium of key policies, plans and guidelines), Appendix H (public realm map layers), Appendix I (active transportation data sets), Appendix J (parks asset and use survey report) and Appendix K (neighbourhood demographic profiles) See indicative weighting of team level of effort when forming bid teams – Section 3.7.2 Account for student volunteers for public life study – Section 3.4 Be mindful of proposal evaluation table – Appendix E Pay attention to mandatory requirements – Section 4.2 and throughout RFP document Note definitions of ‘permissive’ versus ‘imperative’ verbs in the RFP (‘may’ and ‘should’ versus ‘must’, ‘shall’ and ‘will’) Use the forms provided (e.g., Appendix F)
SUBMISSION CONSIDERATIONS
Questions?