socioeconomic impact of tourism centres in the northern finland

12
Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres in the Northern Finland Kari Aalto, Manager of International Affairs Council of Oulu Region

Upload: braden

Post on 14-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres in the Northern Finland. Kari Aalto, Manager of International Affairs Council of Oulu Region. Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region. General information - Northern Finland. • Population density 4,4 / km2 • Lapland 2/km2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres

in the Northern FinlandKari Aalto,

Manager of International AffairsCouncil of Oulu Region

Page 2: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

General information - Northern Finland

• Population density 4,4 / km2

• Lapland 2/km2

• Oulu Region (Obj. 1 areas) 3,85/km2

• EU average 121/km2

• Population 557 317

• Lapland 189 288

• Oulu Region 368 029

• Total area ~136 000 km2

• Lapland 98 937 km2

• Oulu Region 37 121 km2

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

Page 3: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

Tourist Centres in Lapland

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

Page 4: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

CASE LEVI AND RUKA

KUUSAMO (municipality)

• ~18 000 inhabitants

• Supply of labour 6 241 persons

• Employment 6 061

RUKA (tourist centre)

• 36 000 beds (16 000 in Ruka)

• Used capacity 44,6%

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

KITTILÄ (municipality)

• ~6 000 inhabitants

• Supply of labour 2 194 persons

• Employment 2 139

LEVI (tourist centre)

• 15 000 beds

• Used capacity 55,4%

Data Pekka KauppilaUnversity of Oulu

Page 5: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

CASE LEVI AND RUKA 2

RUKA

• Jobs 1990-1999

• Ruka (tourist Centre) +30%

• Kuusamo (the whole municipality) –13%

• Jobs at private companies 1993-2001

• Ruka +195%

• Kuusamo +66%

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

LEVI

• Jobs 1990-1999

• Levi (tourist centre) +120%

• Kittilä (the whole municipality) – 17%

• Jobs at private companies 1993-2001

• Levi + 197%

• Kittilä +88%

Data Pekka KauppilaUnversity of Oulu

Page 6: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

TOURISM FIGURES

KUUSAMO

• ~ 1 million travellers

• Tourism income 71 million €

• 6 000 holiday apartments / cottages

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

LAPLAND

• ~ 1,6 million travellers

• Tourism income 324 million €

• 25 809 holiday apartments / cottages

Page 7: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

Mines, ores and significant occurrences in Lapland

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

Page 8: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

Big Industries in the North Calotte

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

Page 9: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

Kuusamo ICT Program• Five Point Program

• Develop ICT

• Utilize ICT in Business

• ICT infrastructure

• Involvement of Interest Groups

• Improve ICT Image

• Results

• 250 eLearning students

• 250 new jobs in ICT

• 15% out of employed found new jobs

• Competitive advantage from ICT infra

• ICT linked with tourism

• National and International recognition

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

Page 10: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

SOCIOECONOMICAL IMPACTS OF TOURISM CENTRES’ DEVELOPMENT (including EU funding)

• Population increased, though centralized

• Population structure more favourable

• Gender structure healthier

• Age structure healthier

• Workforce increased

• Source of livelihood mainly from service sector

• Economical balance of resources good

• Employment rate increased

• Unemployment rate decreased

• Workplaces in private business increased

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region

Page 11: Socioeconomic Impact of Tourism Centres  in the Northern Finland

SOCIOECONOMICAL IMPACTS OF TOURISM CENTRES 2

• Service level in municipalities higher

•Infrastructure better

• Better roads

• Better flight connections

• Accessibility and connectivity higher

• Better image

• More tax incomes

• More comfortable residential environment

• Natural and cultural environment in balance

Kari Aalto, Council of Oulu Region