social security reform and the basic income grant workshop on the basic income grant presented to...

SocialSecurityReform and theBasic

IncomeGrant

Workshop on the Basic Income GrantPresented to the Select

Committee on Social ServicesBy the Basic Income Grant

Coalition25 June 2002


IncomeGrant

“There will be universal access to an integrated and sustainable social security system. Every South African should have a minimum income, sufficient to meet basic subsistence needs, and should not have to live below minimum acceptable standards. The social security system will also work intersectorally to alleviate poverty.”[1][1] Chapter 7, Paragraph 27 of the White Paper for Social Welfare, 1997.


IncomeGrant

Principles of the BIG Coalition

• Universal Coverage – from cradle to grave and not subjected to a means test

• Relationship to existing grants: No one should receive less in social assistance grants than before the intro of a BIG

• Amount: No less than R100 per person per month

• Delivery Mechanisms• Financing


IncomeGrant

Members of the Coalition

• Age-in-Action, AIDS Consortium, Alliance for Children’s Entitlement to Social Security, Anglican Diocese of Johannesburg, Black Sash, Child Health Policy Institute, Congress of South African Trade Unions, Co-operative for Research and Education, Development Resources Centre, Diakonia Council of Churches., ESSET, Gender Advocacy Programme, Community Law Centre (UWC), Southern African Catholic Bishops’ Conference, South African Council of Churches, South Africa New Economics Foundation (SANE), South African NGO Coalition (SANGOCO), Treatment Action Campaign, Young Christian Workers National Secretariat


IncomeGrant

The Social, Economic and Administrative

Impact of a Basic Income Grant

25 June 2002


IncomeGrant

Overview• Social impact: how effective would a

basic income grant be in addressing poverty and severe destitution?

• Economic impact: how will the basic income grant affect growth, development and job creation? Can the economic afford it?

• Administrative impact: is the basic income grant administratively feasible? How can government overcome the capacity constraints?


IncomeGrant

Measuring the social impact

• Use household surveys and micro-simulation models to evaluate the poverty impact

• Poverty headcount--how many people are freed from poverty?

• Poverty gap--how much does the policy reduce the gap between the incomes of the poor and the poverty line?


IncomeGrant

The social impact of the BIG

PolicyPoverty

gapreduction

Additionalpeople freedfrom poverty

Currentsituation

23% --

Full take-upof existinggrants

36% 0.8 millionpeople

BasicIncomeGrant

74% 6.3 millionpeople


IncomeGrant

The BIG is developmental and supports economic growth

• The government’s HRD strategy identifies how poverty and inequality undermine human capital development and thus constrain higher incomes – the poor are trapped by their poverty

• The Basic Income Grant provides income security, promoting productive risk-taking and helping to break that trap

• The grant supports improved nutrition, health, education and productivity


IncomeGrant

Poverty is a tax on workers--the Basic Income Grant reduces that tax and supports both higher

wages and job creation

Living standards and finding a job

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

KwaZulu Natal Gauteng Western Cape

Living standard prior to finding a job (quintile)

1 2 3 4 5 KwaZulu Natal

1 2 3 4 5 Gauteng

1 2 3 4 5 Western Cape


IncomeGrant

The macro-economic impact supports investment and growth

• The government’s MTBPS recognises that “a more equal distribution of wealth favours higher rates of growth.”

• Providing all South Africans with an economic stake improves social stability and reinforces the foundations for more investment and economic growth

• Shifting spending power to the poor stimulates job-creating economic activity


IncomeGrant

The cost of the BIG

• Using a micro-simulation model, the gross cost of the BIG identified by the terms of reference of the Committee of Enquiry is calculated to be R46 billion

• Using taxpayer data provided by SARS, the analysis identified adjustments to tax rates that recovered R22 billion

• The net cost of the grant is R24 billion

• The net cost is equal to the actual amount of resources transferred to the poor


IncomeGrant

Government Revenue OECD Comparison

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Korea

South Africa

USA

S w itzerland

Ja pan

Australia

Canada

Iceland

Ireland

Portugal

UK

Spa in

Gre ece

Cz ech Re p.

Italy

Germ any

Fra nce

Austr ia

Belg ium

Norw ay

Ne therla nds

Finland

De nm ark

S we den

p erce nt of na tio na l incom e

South Africa’s

tax revenue is

relatively low

by international

standards


IncomeGrant

South Africa’s tax revenue is relatively low compared to countries

with comparable income levels

0 10 20 30 40 50

Percent

HUNGARY

POLAND

BRAZIL

URUGUAY

GABON

OMAN

TRINIDAD & TO.

PANAMA

SOUTH AFRICA

VENEZUELA

TURKEY

THAILAND

MEXICO

Government Revenue as a Percent of National Income (GDP)

Source: IMF


IncomeGrant

The Fiscal Impact

• Tax effort analysis demonstrates that South Africa can raise taxes by five percent of national income without undermining international competitiveness

• The basic income grant only requires an increase in taxes of two percent of national income

• The positive growth and development effects improve the affordability of the grant in the medium-to-long run


IncomeGrant

The Administrative Impact

• Research documents the source of administrative failure in the delivery of existing social security programmes--

– lack of bureaucratic commitment

– bureaucratic intensity of the “means test” and other administrative requirements

• The Basic Income Grant requires substantially less administrative resources

– “rights based”

– no “means test”

– targeting through the tax system (SARS)


IncomeGrant

The government’s strategy on administrative capacity

• In April, the government adopted the “Microeconomic Reform Strategy”, which has among its aims the improvement of government administrative capacity for social delivery

• The government has made eradicating poverty a priority, most recently in President Mbeki’s state-of-the-nation address (2002)

• Addressing corruption--the transparency property of a Basic Income Grant

• Delivery mechanisms

• Implementation strategy


IncomeGrant

Conclusions

• The Basic Income Grant is the most effective policy option for eliminating destitution and reducing poverty.

• Effective social security reform is developmental and affordable, generating a positive growth impact that promotes job creation while improving the effectiveness of social delivery and long term sustainability.

• The administrative requirements of the grant are substantially more manageable than those for existing social programmes. The government’s current strategy aims to further improve bureaucratic capacity for social delivery.


IncomeGrant

Administration of the Basic Income Grant


IncomeGrant

Key Requirements for Successful Social Assistance

• Good physical, administrative and information infrastructure

• Avoid complicated means test which acts as a barrier to entry

• Keep possibilities for corruption as low as possible


IncomeGrant

Current Constraints in the Administration of Grants

• Lack of awareness about grants currently available and the procedures involved in accessing them

• Insufficient pay points; lack of adequate infrastructure at pay points

• Delays in the processing of applications

• Money lenders• Internal corruption


IncomeGrant

Current Plans for Improvements in Delivery

• Social Development Department– The norms and standards project– SOCPEN replacement

• Public Service & Admin Dept.– Service Delivery Innovation Policy

• GCIS – Multi-Purpose Community Centres

• Public Service Commission– Citizen’s Forums for Service Delivery

Improvement


IncomeGrant

Home Affairs National Identification System

(HANIS)• Automated Fingerprint

Identification System (AFIS)• ID card• Integration of AFIS, ID and

population register• Smart card onto which various

applications can be loaded• Social grants have been prioritised


IncomeGrant

Payment System

• Smart card/chip system - debit card/telephone card - many initiatives underway including HANIS and reserve bank

• Post Office Bank

• Financial Institutions

• Tax system


IncomeGrant

Preparations for Implementation

• Concurrent programmes• Put in place institutional measures

and processes– Registration campaign for adults and

children– Extension of post bank infrastructure

and negotiations with other delivery agents

• Education and Training Programmes– targetting civil servants and the public


IncomeGrant

Further preparations

• Using existing intedepartmental forums for co-ordination– Social Cluster– DG’s Forum– Departments involved inService

Delivery

social security reform and the basic income grant workshop on the basic income grant presented to...

Documents