smooth enucleation by hydraulic force control …...smooth enucleation by hydraulic force control...

1
Smooth Enucleation by Hydraulic Force Control Using Magnetically Driven Microtool 1 Lin Feng, 2 Masaya Hagiwara, 1 Akihiko Ichikawa, 3 Tomohiro Kawahara, 1 Fumihito Arai 1 Department of Micro-Nano Systems Engineering, Nagoya university, 2 UCLA, 3 Kyushu Institute of technology Contact person:馮 林(Feng Lin) E-mail: [email protected], URL: http://www.biorobotics.mech.nagoya-u.ac.jp/, TEL: 052-789-5220, FAX : 052-789-5027 6. References 2. Concept 3. Methods 4. Experiments Acknowledgement This work is partially supported by JST-SENTAN and the Nagoya University Global COE program for Education and Research of Micro-Nano Mechatronics. 1. Background 5. Conclusions and future work 1. The volume of the enucleated part is controllable. 2. The incision of enucleated oocyte is smooth and neat. 1. M. Hagiwara et al., “On-chip magnetically actuated robot with ultrasonic vibration for single cell manipulations”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 11, pp.2049-2054, 2011. Conventional cell manipulation On-chip microrobot based manipulation Mechanical robot arm operations Problems: 1. Reproducibility 2. Contamination 3. Success rate 4. Productivity 5. Operability (a) (b) (a) (b) Problems: 1. Misalignment 2. Continuous process 3. Volume control A B A B Previous Enucleation approach (a) SEM image of after wet etching (b) SEM image of Si-Ni hybrid MMT Riblet MMT Fluid friction reduction of microrobot by riblet surface MMT Oocyte inlet Micro chamber PDMS chip Outlet MMT Oocytes Sucking in Oocyte Enucleation Process Blue arrows: Flow direction Yellow arrow: MMT moving direction White arrows: Oocyte moving direction Oocyte is regularly 100μm in diameter, To balance the pressure. Oocyte inlet micochannel width: 150 μm, height: 300 μm, length: 1mm. R1= R2 → R2: width: 300 μm, height: 300 μm, length: 2.343 mm The electric circuit analogy : hydraulic resistance Η: viscosity coefficient L: the length of the microchannel A: the cross-sectional area of the channel : the hydraulic radius of the channel A: the cross-sectional area of the channel P: the length of the perimeter of the channel Cutting volume control Volume ratio (10%) FEM Simulations Object surface: Surface traction (force/area), y component (Pa) Arrow: Velocity field Slice: Velocity field, y component (m/s) 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 0 -0.005 -0.001 -0.0015 -0.002 -0.0025 -0.003 Velocity Surface traction 73.4 Pa 60° Nucleus Oocyte Enucleated oocyte 50 μm (e) Oocyte Enucleation Process 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 120° 90° 60° Required time (s) Cutting corner angle Cutting time Enucleation time evaluation 1.6 s for single oocyte enucleation

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Smooth Enucleation by Hydraulic Force Control …...Smooth Enucleation by Hydraulic Force Control Using Magnetically Driven Microtool 1Lin Feng, 2Masaya Hagiwara, 1Akihiko Ichikawa,

Smooth Enucleation by Hydraulic Force Control Using Magnetically Driven Microtool

1Lin Feng, 2Masaya Hagiwara, 1Akihiko Ichikawa, 3Tomohiro Kawahara, 1Fumihito

Arai

1Department of Micro-Nano Systems Engineering, Nagoya university, 2UCLA, 3Kyushu

Institute of technology

Contact person:馮 林(Feng Lin) E-mail: [email protected], URL: http://www.biorobotics.mech.nagoya-u.ac.jp/, TEL: 052-789-5220, FAX : 052-789-5027

6. References

2. Concept 3. Methods

4. Experiments

Acknowledgement

This work is partially supported by JST-SENTAN and the Nagoya University Global COE program for Education and Research of Micro-Nano Mechatronics.

1. Background

5. Conclusions and future work 1. The volume of the enucleated part is controllable.

2. The incision of enucleated oocyte is smooth and neat. 1. M. Hagiwara et al., “On-chip magnetically actuated robot with ultrasonic vibration for

single cell manipulations”, Lab on a Chip, vol. 11, pp.2049-2054, 2011.

Conventional cell manipulation

On-chip microrobot based manipulation

Mechanical robot arm operations

Problems: 1. Reproducibility 2. Contamination 3. Success rate 4. Productivity 5. Operability

(a) (b)

(a)

(b)

Problems: 1. Misalignment 2. Continuous process 3. Volume control

A B

A

B

Previous Enucleation approach

(a) SEM image of after wet etching

(b) SEM image of Si-Ni hybrid MMT

Riblet MMT

Fluid friction reduction of microrobot by riblet surface

MMT Oocyte inlet

Micro chamber

PDMS chip

Outlet

MMT

Oocytes

Sucking in

Oocyte Enucleation Process Blue arrows: Flow direction Yellow arrow: MMT moving direction White arrows: Oocyte moving direction

𝑹𝒉 ≅𝟖𝜼𝑳

𝒓𝒉𝟐𝑨

𝒓𝒉 ≅𝟐𝑨

𝑷

Oocyte is regularly 100μm in diameter, To balance the pressure. Oocyte inlet micochannel width: 150 μm, height: 300 μm, length: 1mm. R1= R2 → R2: width: 300 μm, height: 300 μm, length: 2.343 mm

The electric circuit analogy

𝑅ℎ: hydraulic resistance Η: viscosity coefficient L: the length of the microchannel A: the cross-sectional area of the channel 𝑟ℎ: the hydraulic radius of the channel A: the cross-sectional area of the channel P: the length of the perimeter of the channel

Cutting volume control Volume ratio (10%)

FEM Simulations

Object surface: Surface traction (force/area),

y component (Pa) Arrow: Velocity field Slice: Velocity field, y component (m/s)

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-6

-8

-10

0

-0.005

-0.001

-0.0015

-0.002

-0.0025

-0.003

Velocity Surface

traction

73.4 Pa 60°

Nucleus

Oocyte Enucleated oocyte

50 μm

(e)

Oocyte Enucleation Process 0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

120° 90° 60°

Req

uir

ed t

ime (

s)

Cutting corner angle

Cutting time

Enucleation time evaluation

1.6 s for single oocyte enucleation