smc martin inc. - us environmental protection agency · smc martin inc. report on biological...

SMC Martin Inc.

REPORT ONBIOLOGICAL STUDIESCONDUCTED AT SINCLAIR REFINERY SITEWELLSVILLE, NEW YORK

300001

A Subsidiary of Science Management Corporation

REPORT ONBIOLOGICAL STUDIESCONDUCTED AT SINCLAIR REFINERY SITEWELLSVILLE, NEW YORK

8764/MH

300602

SMC Martin

900 W. Valley Forge RoadP.O. Box 859Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482Telephone 215 265-2700 or 783-7480

November 6, 19858764-040-9200

Chittibabu Vasudevan, Ph.D., P.E.Senior Sanitary EngineerBureau of Western Remedial ActionDivision of Solid and Hazardous WasteNew York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation

50 Wolf RoadAlbany, NY 12233-0001

Dear Dr. Vasudevan:

The Biological Studies Report submitted here is part of theTask 2 remedial investigation of the Sinclair Refinery. Thiswork was performed for our contract No. D-000638 with NYSDEC.The firm of Michael Baker, Jr., of New York was subcontracted toperform the biological studies on this project; this documentrepresents their final report following our review andmodifications made to the draft version dated November 26, 1984.

There have been no significant changes in interpretation ofthe data, or conclusions of the report from the previouslysubmitted draft version, the results of which were considered inpreparation of our draft report "Phase I Remedial Investigation- Sinclair Refinery Site," dated March 14, 1985. I will contactyou shortly to answer any questions you may have on thissubmittal.

Sincerely,

SMC MARTIN, INC.

• C^O-^Vvjaxv^-^Daniel E. Erdman PG, CP6SProject Manager

DEE/mh8764:deelmh2

300003A Subsidiary of Science Management Corporation

REPORT ONBIOLOGICAL STUDIES CONDUCTEDAT THE SINCLAIR REFINERY SITE

WELLSVILLE, NY

PREPARED FOR

SMC MARTIN INC.900 W. VALLEY FORGE ROADVALLEY FORGE, PA 19482

PREPARED BY

MICHAEL BAKER, JR. OF NEW YORK, INC.295 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017

JULY 16, 1985

300004

OBJECTIVES

The subject study has been designed to assess the extent to which thebioaccumulation of 59 priority pollutants has occurred in representativeaquatic and terrestrial fauna inhabiting the Sinclair Refinery Site.The study involves biological field work, chemical analysis of compositeanimal tissue samples, data analysis/interpretation, and the formulationof recommendations for further study, if warranted. Due to the extreme-ly large number of potential test organisms, test tissues, pollutants,and sampling locations, this study must be regarded as a "first cut"attempt to ascertain whether specific organisms and specific prioritypollutants merit detailed investigations.

The experimental design of investigations directed at amphibians andsmall mammals was ecologically oriented. The intent of these investiga-tions was to quantify average whole body concentrations for each of thesubject priority pollutants in populations of insectivorous and herbi-vorous species inhabiting the Sinclair Site; and to compare/contrastthese concentrations with those measured in off-site populations. Ifthese organisms have, in fact, bioaccumulated priority pollutants, theirconsumption by predatory species could impair the reproductive successof these consumers. This phenomenon has been well documented in thetechnical literature for pesticides in raptors (birds of prey). Wholespecimens were used in the analytical work of the subject study inasmuchas amphibians and small mammals are consumed whole by predatory species(e.g., owls, hawks, eagles, foxes, and snakes) in nature.

The experimental design of investigations directed at fish and aquaticmacroinvertebrates was oriented toward public health and environmentalengineering considerations. The public health considerations involvesport fishermen removing fish from the Genesee River reach downstream ofthe Sinclair Site for personal consumption. The environmental engi-neering considerations involve supplementing water and soil test datawith biological data in order to assess the extent of contaminantmigration from the site under existing conditions (prior to remedia-tion). Originally, public health considerations were deemed to be the

300005

overriding factor in the aquatic program. Consequently, standardfillets (similar to those that would be taken by fishermen) of speciestypically regarded as game fish or panfish were slated for chemicalanalyses. During the actual field work, however, specimens capturedwere of insufficient size to fillet and still obtain the requisitesample size for the analytical protocol. Whole body homogenates weretherefore used in the analyses, with the emphasis of the study shiftingto the aforementioned environmental engineering considerations. Wholebody tissues were also used in the chemical analysis of forage fishesand most benthic macroinvertebrates inasmuch as these fish food organ-isms are consumed whole by game fish and panfish.

SAMPLING

General

Selected aquatic and terrestrial fauna were captured; identified to thelowest taxonomic level practicable (generally, to species for verte-brates and to family or genus for invertebrates); characterized to theextent practicable (vertebrates only) in terms of relevant morphologicalparameters (length, weight, sex, etc.); and processed in the field forsubsequent chemical analysis in the laboratory. Organisms were capturedby a variety of methods, as detailed below, from suspected areas ofcontamination as well as from upgradient, off-site locations. Biologi-cal field work was performed by ecologists representing Michael Baker,Jr. of New York, Inc. (New York, NY) and its subcontractor, AquaticSystems Corporation (Pittsburgh, PA). All ecologists performing on-sitework had completed EPA-approved health and safety training courses. Allfield work was completed in July of 1984. All collections were made inaccordance with the provisions of Scientific Collector's License SC-1870, issued to Baker by the New York State Department of EnvironmentalConservation on November 7, 1983.

300006

Aquatic Organisms

Fish were sampled at three locations near the Sinclair Refinery site(See Figure 1). Station #1 was located approximately 2-1/2 river milesupstream of the refinery site, near Stannards, NY. Station #3 waslocated adjacent to the refinery site and Station #4 was located approx-imately 1-1/2 river miles downstream of the refinery site. All fishwere collected by electroshocking and netting. Aquatic macroinverte-brates were collected at the three aforementioned sites and also in aslough draining the refinery site (Station #2). Macroinvertebrates werecollected with a Surber sampler.

The locations of all aquatic sampling stations are shown in Figure 1.Ecologists assigned to the sampling program used their knowledge ofhabitat preferences to select sampling locations with the greatestlikelihood of sampling success. In all cases, sampling activities beganat the upstream most station and progressed in a downstream direction.

After capture, organisms were identified, homogenized and composited bytaxa, containerized in glass jars, and shipped on dry ice to RECRAResearch Labs (Amherst, NY) for analysis. At RECRA Labs, the tissuehomogenates were analyzed for the 59 priority pollutants listed inAppendix A. The constituents chosen for analysis were selected from theU.S. EPA's list of priority pollutants. These are compounds with knownsignificance in terms of public health and environmental effects. Theselection of a limited number of constituents is consistent with theobjectives of this study, namely to provide data that may indicate overtcontamination of biological systems at a reasonable level of effort andto determine the need for additional studies.

Terrestrial Organisms

Small mammals were captured with Victor® snap-type mouse traps set ingrids. Trapping was performed at two locations on the Sinclair Refinerysite, and at one off-site location (approximately 1-1/2 miles southeastof the refinery) in order to provide background data. Station #5 (the

30000?

T. •TV f.

Go!' \,// £<•«•?

^ • jj^^JF- "* »V">^JJ1 vJV

^*.-t;*f

^(fit-̂ K

^.-'^MUM I MlIftC FIELD

'....»L..

nE\

/, / ';y\

•>\)*r<

SrATfoHO

P,,.

\

BIOLOGICAL SURVEY SAMPLMG LOCATIONSSNCUUR RERNERY - WELLSVLLE, NY

A -AQUATIC STATIONSFIGURE 1 • -TERRESTRIAL STATIONS

SUloo WMt

\.

300008

off-site location) was composed of two, 24-trap grids. One of thesegrids was located in an old field area, and the other was located in anadjacent section of forestland. The first on-site terrestrial station(Station #6) was located on an upland portion of the refinery site.This station was composed of an open area with low vegetative cover anda number of bare spots, some of which contained oil. As at the off-siteterrestrial station, sampling here consisted of two, 24-trap grids, withtraps set at approximately 10 meter intervals. Station #7 was thesecond of the on-site terrestrial sampling locations. This station wascomposed of an old field bordered by woodlands within the refinery site.

The locations of all terrestrial sampling stations are shown in Fig-ure 1. In all cases, ecologists assigned to the sampling project usedfield observations, coupled with their knowledge of habitat preferences,to choose sampling locations which had the greatest likelihood fortrapping success. The location of the off-site sampling station waschosen because of its similarity to the habitats present on the refinerysite.

SAMPLE PREPARATION

Organisms sorted into taxa-specific station-specific lots were homogen-ized whole in an Osterizer® multi-speed electric blender with a stain-less steel blending assembly and standard borosilicate glass jar. Priorto all blending operations, the jar was decontaminated by the followingprocedure: 1) washing with non-phosphate detergent and hot water;2) rinsing with tap water; 3) rinsing with distilled water; 4) rinsingwith acetone; 5) rinsing with hexane; and 6) air-dry ing.

Although EPA's "Interim Methods for the Sampling and Analysis of Prior-ity Pollutants in Sediments and Fish Tissue" (_!) recommends pre-coolingthe blender jar with dry ice and blending the tissues in the presence ofdry ice, blending operations for this study did not use dry ice. Therationale for this procedural modification is that carbon dioxidereleased during sublimation may induce chemical transformations in theanimal tissues as a result of pH depression. The field team did,

300009

however, perform all blending operations as quickly as possible to avoidvolatilization of organic compounds from thawing specimens.

RESULTS

General

Generally, the success of the aquatic sampling program was greater thanthat of the terrestrial program. Of the 17 aquatic samples originallyscheduled to be collected, only one (A-6, macroinvertebrates fromrefinery slough) was not collected. Organisms for this sample were notavailable because of habitat conditions in the slough (silt bottomapparently contaminated by petrochemicals). The terrestrial samplingprogram was less successful, with only 6 of the original 21 scheduledsamples collected. This reduced success may be attributed to poorphysical habitat for small mammals (e.g., few brush piles, fallen logs,rock piles, etc.), or the fact that traps were often prematurely sprungby invertebrates (slugs).

Table 1 shows a list of the species collected under the biologicalprogram, the location where the samples were taken, and the compositionin terms of species and number of organisms in each sample.

After blending, the contents of the blender jar were poured into wide-

mouth, glass sample jars with screw caps consisting of Teflon® liners inphenolic plastic caps. The sides of the blender jar were scraped asnecessary with a Teflon® policeman to provide as complete a sampletransfer as practicable. The sample bottles were decontaminated priorto use by the standard procedure described earlier. The sample bottleswere labeled, and stored on dry ice while awaiting shipment to theanalytical laboratory.

On the final day of the field trip, all sample containers were packagedin ice chests containing dry ice. Samples were packaged to avoidbreakage of the glass sample jars. The ice chests and NYSDEC Continuity

300010

TABIZ 1MASTHl LIST OF SAMPLES PREPARED IMXR THE BIOLOGICAL PROGMH

Sanple StationCode Oode Station Location

A-l SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-2 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-3 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-4 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-5 SIA Gen. River near StamardsA-7 SIA 2 On-Site SloughA-8 SIA 3 Gen. River at SiteA-9 SIA 3 Gen. River at Site

A-10 SIA 3 Gen. River at Site

A-ll SIA 3 Gen. River at SiteA-l 2 SIA 3 Gen. River at Site

A-13 SIA 4 Gen. River Rt-17

A-14 SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17A-1S SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17A-16 SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17A-l 7 SIA 4 Gen. River near Rt-17T-4 SIA 5 Off-Site ParcelT-5 SIA 5 Off-Site ParcelT-7 SIA 6 On-Site Zone I1

T-ll SIA 6 On-Site Zone flT-18 SIA 7 On-Slte Zone 12T-21 SIA 7 On-Site Zone 12

Hater ofTaxa

SpeciesSpeciesSpeciesFamilySpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpecies

1 Family

SpeciesSpecies

Family

SpeciesSpeciesFamilySpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpecies

Commttne

Creek ChubUnite StickerRock BassCrayfishBullfrog TadpoleBullfrog TadpoleCreek ChubWhite Sucker

PunpWneeedRock BassLargemouth BassSballmouth Baas

CrayfishBullfrog Tadpoles

Golden ShinerCannon ShinerBlintnose Minnow

White SuckerPunpkinBeedCrayfishBullfrog TadpoleMeadow VoleDeer MouseShorttail ShrewMeadow VoleMeadow VoleShorttail Shrew

Scientific Mane

Senotllus atranaculatusCatoetonus ocnnereoniAobloplltes rupestrlsAstacldaeRana catesbelanaRana catesbelanaSenotllus atranaculatusCatoetcnus uMimamd

Leponds glbbosusAnUoplltes rupestrlsMlcropterus ««iiiin<A»«Micropterus dolcndeui

AstacldaeRana cateabelana

Notarigonus crygoleucasNotropis oomutusPiaepnales notatus

Catostonus coonersoniLepoBds glbbosusAstacldaeRana catesbelsnaMlcrotus pen isylvanlcusPeromyscus maniculatusBlarlna brevicaudaMlcrotus pemsylvanicusMlcrotus pemsylvanicusBlarlna brevicauda

SpecimensHomogenized

8118

16"12«12

' 105

3622

14«12

51420

72217

»1244

10252

SanpleWeight (g)

178ISOISO135ISO150168150

130

124150

142

150150143ISO10170

18681

14830

Specimen lengthRange (on)

76-18697-31048-175

———

70-189179-315

57-12151-105

55-6183-105

_—

77-9559-107

42-81

117-26656-122

——

98-150117-157100-120136-152105-150

90-96

Specimen WeightRange (g)

7-809-3292-115

———

3-7260-292

4-343-263-4

9-14

__—

4-92-111-7

14-2044-41

——

13-4511-2116-2442-4317-4015-17

ArchiveAvailable

YesYesYesHoHoHaYesYes

Ho

HoHo

No

YeaYesNoNoNoNotbHoNoNo

ArchiveUeltfit (g)

=80=•350=70N/AN/AN/A200

N/A

N/AN/A

N/A

"400*200N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

captured for the following sanples: A-6, T-1, T-2, T-3, T-6. T-8, T-9, T-10, T-12, T-13, T-1 A, T-1S. T-16, T-17, T-19, and T-20. Archive materials are stored at thecorporate headquarters of Baker Engineers In Beaver, Pennsylvania.

Analysis of sample T-5 was not conducted because Deer Mice were not collected on-site.

300011

of Evidence Forms identifying the ice chest contents were then shippedby overnight mail service to the RECRA Research, Inc. Laboratory inAmberst, New York.

Aquatic Organisms

None of the organic pollutants analyzed for were found above the limitsof detection in any of the aquatic samples. Likewise, cadmium was belowthe detection limit in all of the aquatic samples.

Lead was detected mostly in the bullfrog tadpole samples. Levels oflead in the upstream, at-site, slough and downstream tadpole sampleswere 0.173, 0.374, 0.100 and 0.197 Vg/g, respectively. The only othersamples containing lead were the at-site creek chub sample with 0.196Vg/g and the downstream forage fish containing 0.123 Vg/g.

The bullfrog tadpole samples were the only samples found to containarsenic above its detectable limits. Arsenic levels (expressed as Vg/g)in the tadpole samples were as follows: upstream, 0.885; at-site, 1.08;slough, 0.930; and downstream, 0.394.

Of the heavy metals tested, nickel occurred with the greatest frequencyand in the greatest concentration. Table 2 summarizes the nickelconcentrations detected in the aquatic samples.

TABLE 2

CONCENTRATION OF NICKEL IN AQUATIC SAMPLES*

Crayfish Tadpoles Forage Fish Creek Chubs White Sucker Sport Fish

Upstream £0.1 1.70 -- 0.470 0.900 £0.1At-site 0.585 3.11 -- 3.69 6.17 0.461Slough -- 1.40Downstream £0.1 4.88 0.123 -- 0.128 1.05

*A11 concentrations in vg nickel/g tissue.

-- Indicates sample not collected.

8

300012

Terrestrial Organisms

None of the organic pollutants analyzed for occurred above their respec-tive limits of detection in any of the terrestrial samples.

Table 3 summarizes the concentrations of lead, nickel, cadmium andarsenic in the terrestrial samples and in composite soil samples fromonsite and background soil samples.

TABLE 3

METAL CONCENTRATIONS* IN SOIL AND TERRESTRIAL TISSUE SAMPLES

Nickel

Composite Soil BackgroundMetal

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

Sample Areas**

14-31

ND

53-1190

Soils

7.9-19

ND

1.3-29

15-49 22-33

On-SiteAnimals

ND

ND

Vole: 0.173-0.176Shrew: 0.157-0.259

Vole: 0.470-0.787Shrew: 0.212-0.452

Off-SiteAnimals

ND

ND

Vole: <0.1

Vole: 0.466

*A11 concentrations in ppm.**Compiled from Reference 2.ND « Not Deleted

DISCUSSION

General

Trapping efforts over four consecutive nights did not provide anyanimals for several of the terrestrial samples. Based upon fieldobservations by the wildlife biologist, the general lack of success canbe attributed to low population densities (resulting from poor physicalhabitat quality, e.g. no fallen logs, etc.) at the on-site stations, andfrom problems with slugs springing the traps.

• f'

3000̂ 3

Organics

Organic chemicals tend to biomagnify through food-chains as contaminatedorganisms serve as food for higher tropic level organisms. The extentto which an organic constituent biomagnifies is a function of itsconcentration in the environment and its solubility in animal lipidtissue (lipophilicity). Inasmuch as all animals contain a certainproportion of lipid tissue, any organism which can serve as food toanother organism can potentially contribute to the biomagnification oflipophillc organic compounds. Large amounts of fatty material in thesolvent extract of several samples interferred with the detection ofmany of the compounds of interest. In cases where such interferenceswere encountered, detection limits (Appendix A) are higher to reflectthis. However, in spite of certain elevated detection limits, adequatedetection limits (0.05 ppm) were obtained for all volatile organicconstituents. The fact that these constituents were not detected in anyof the aquatic or terrestrial samples would seem to indicate that thesubject animals do not regularly come into contact with these contamin-ants.

Inorganics

The total lack of cadmium detection among all samples tested wouldindicate that environmental contamination by this material is notoccurring at or around the Wellsville site. This is consistent with theconspicuous lack of cadmium detection in any of the composite soilsamples collected on-site.

Lead levels detected among bullfrog tadpole samples collected at theat-site station were 116% greater than tadpole samples collected up-stream of the site. Initially, this finding would seem to indicate thestrong likelihood of lead contamination from the Sinclair refinery site.However, tadpoles collected from the refinery slough, an area assumed torepresent a worst case location, had lead levels 422 lower than similarsamples from the upstream station. Lead is known to bioconcentrate inliving tissue from the surrounding medium (3_). Concentrations of 0.24

10

3000M

and 0.16 ppm of lead have been reported in freshwater fish (£̂ 5). Leadwas not detected in any of the samples of game fish collected. Thisfinding suggests that, with respect to lead, no public health conse-quences would result from the consumption of gamefish near the refinerysite. Among the terrestrial samples, lead occurred in significantlyhigher levels among all on-site samples compared with samples collectedoff-site. This finding, in conjunction with elevated levels of lead ison-site soils (Table 3), strongly suggests a causal relationship betweencontaminated site soils and elevated lead levels in the terrestrialon-site samples.

Arsenic is ubiquitous in the environment and is found in all livingorganisms. Information concerning the ecological cycling of arsenic islimited and it is not possible to state with certainty whether arsenictends to accumulate in any one section of the ecosystem (7) • The onlysamples containing arsenic above its limits of detection were thebullfrog tadpole samples. Arsenic levels from tadpole samples collectedat-site and in the refinery slough were roughly 221 and 5% higherrespectively than tadpole samples collected upstream of the site. Allsamples had an arsenic content of less than 1.1 ppm. Freshwater organi-sms inhabitating uncontaminated waters contain up to 3 ppm of arsenic.The average arsenic content of a variety of freshwater aquatic organismsvaries up to 2.1 ppm (7). In light of this, the range of arsenicconcentrations found in the tadpole samples collected as part of thisstudy (0.394-1.08 ppm) does not seem unreasonable and cannot be inter-preted as an indication of overt arsenic contamination of the aquaticecosystem at the site. Also, the fact that arsenic was detected in onlyone species, and also detected in all samples of that species, suggeststhat the elevated concentration of this element in the tadpoles may be aspecies-related phenomenon rather than occurring as a result of contamin-ation.

Nickel, like many trace elements, is widespread in the contemporary-human environment (8). Of the priority pollutants for which analyseswere conducted, nickel was by far the most widespread constituent and italso occurred in the greatest concentrations. When compared to theircorresponding upstream samples, the at-site homogenates of bullfrog

300015

tadpoles, white suckers, and creek chubs showed significant increases innickel concentrations. While superficially these data would seem toindicate the possibility of nickel contamination by the Wellsville site,the lack of an associated increase in nickel concentrations in the riversediments sampled upstream and at the site, would tend to indicate thatthese data may merely reflect consistently higher nickel concentrationsamong aquatic animals of the Genessee River. Normal ranges for nickelin aquatic tissue are well below those values observed from animalscollected near the refinery site. Normal levels of nickel reported forflesh of various species of freshwater fish collected in the northeast-ern United States average 0.2 ppm (J5). However, a direct comparisonwith these data does not apply, as reported data refer to flesh samplesrather than to whole body homogenates. Most ingested nickel is excretedthrough the feces; and, since whole-body homogenates were analyzed, anymaterial in the digestive tracts of the specimens would have beenincluded in the analyses. Inasmuch as domestic crude oil contains anaverage of 0.00142Z nickel (10), and since the Sinclair site processeddomestic crude oil, the possibility of an association between therefineries' presence, and elevated nickel levels observed among theaquatic fauna living nearby cannot be overlooked. The concentration ofnickel in meadow voles collected at the on-site sampling stations is notsignificantly higher than in the offsite vole sample. Similarly,although no corresponding offsite shrew sample was available for directcomparison, the levels of nickel in shrew tissue collected on-site donot Indicate overt contamination by this element.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of this study, no further studies on the bioaccumu-lation of priority pollutants are recommended at this time. However,additional ecological studies of the Genesee River main stem before,during, and after remediation are strongly recommended.

The remedial action ultimately selected for implementation may disruptthe ecology of the river in two ways: 1) by sedimentation impacts,which are commonly encountered in large earthmoving projects; or 2) by

12 300016

offsite migration of toxic priority pollutants, which could result fromexposure of wastes during site cleanup. The most reliable and quantita-tive means of documenting whether such impacts occur is by sampling andcharacterizing the benthic macroinvertebrate community. Accordingly, itis recommended that five sampling stations be established in the one-mile reach of the Genesee River downstream from the Sinclair site. Inthe vicinity of each station composite samples would be collected atrandom from the left third of the channel, center channel, and the rightthird of the channel. These samples would be collected before, during,and after remediation with an attempt to match collections in terms ofseason. The resultant data would be compared and contrasted in aquantitative fashion using the Shannon-Weaver species diversity index(d). The data also would be evaluated in a quantitative fashion givenavailable information on the pollution-tolerances of dominant forms.

REFERENCES

(1) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1980. "Interim Methods forthe Sampling and Analysis of Priority Pollutants in Sediments andFish Tissue." EPA 600/4-81-055, Washington, D.C.

(2) SMC Martin, Inc., 1985. Draft Phase I Remedial Investigation,Sinclair Refinery Site, Wellsville, New York. Volume II.

(3) Pringle, B.H., D.E. Hissong, E.L. Katz, and S.T. Mulawka. 1968."Trace Metal Accumulation by Estuarine Mollusks." J. Sanit. Eng.Div.; Proc. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 94:455-475.

(4) Kehoe, R.A., F. Thamann, and J. Cholak. 1933. "On the NormalAbsorption and Excretion of Lead. I. Lead Absorption and Excre-tion in Primitive Life." J. Ind. Hyg. 15:257-272.

(5) Harley, J.H. 1970. "Discussion - Sources of Lead in PerennialRyegrass and Radishes. Environ. Sci. Tech. 4:225.

(6) Bowen, H.G.M. 1966. Trace Elements in Biochemistry, AcademicPress, Inc., NY.

13 300017

(7) Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, NationalResearch Council. 1977. Arsenic; Medical and Biologic Effects ofEnvironmental Pollutants. National Academy of Science, Washington,D.C.

(8) Committee on Biologic Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants, NationalResearch Council. 1975. Nickel; Medical and Biologic Effects ofEnvironmental Pollutants. National Academy of Science, Washington,D.C.

(9) Wells, G.C. 1956. Effects of Nickel on the Skin. Brit. J. Derm.68:237-242.

(10) Anon. 1969. "Hand Eczema and Other Hand Dermatoses in SouthSweden." Acta Derm. Venereol. 49:5-91, (Supp:61).

300018

APPENDIX A

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

300019

fib

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.

Report Date: 9/27/84

INTRODUCTION:

On July 31, 1984 samples were received at Recra Environmental Laboratories.

A request was made by Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. to have the samples

analyzed for selected volatile, acid extractable, and base neutral compounds,

pesticide/PCB's, and four total metals.

This report will address the results of those analyses.

METHODS:

Volatile, acid extractable, and base neutral compounds were analyzed by

Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). Pesticide/PCB's were analyzed

by Gas Chromatography.

Methodologies for the volatile and metals analyses can be found in

Interim Methods for the Sampling & Analysis of Priority Pollutants in Sediments

& Fish Tissue, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Revised October 1980.

Samples for the analyses for acid/base neutral compounds and pesticide/PCB's

were prepared according to Sonication Extraction - Method 3550 found in Test

Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, July 1982, SW-846,

Second Edition, and analyzed according to the appropriate Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) methodologies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

As requested, sample T-5 was not analyzed.

The following samples were analyzed in replicate but no positive values

resulted:

A-4 and A-16 for acid/base neutral compoundsA-8, A-10, A-13, and T-ll for volatile compounds

RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (CONT'D.):

Low recoveries for pentafluorophenol and the volatile internal standards

in certain samples were determined to be a function of the sample matrix.

Checks for possible instrumentation problems were negative and replicate

analyses of the samples in question resulted in the same low recoveries.

Analyses for specific Pesticides/PCB's are based upon the matching of

retention times between samples and standards on a single gas chromatographic

column. Gas chromatographic values reported as "less than" (<) indicate the

working detection limit for the given sample and/or parameter.

Compounds reported as ND are "not detected".

Respectfully Submitted,


Barbara J. KrajewskiGC/MS Supervisor

BJK/jhs

RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES O U U U C J.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY


PARAMETER

2-chlorophenol

2,4-dinitrophenol

DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/g)

3.3

42

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

A-l

ND

ND

A- 2

ND

ND

A- 3

ND

ND

A- 4

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIOiNSarnnle Dat*Extraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luoropheno] - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpentaf luorcpheTiCl - Recovery

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g

91%12 ug/g79%

12 ug/g56%

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g120%12 ug/g92%

12 ug/g51%

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g

98%12 ug/g65%

12 ug/g74%

7/24/84 i9/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%

12 ug/g80% _

12 ug/g0%

FOR RECRA EnVIRGNMIiNIAL LABORATORIES

DATEV

A-3


I.D. //S4-754 300022

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHIIOMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY


1

PARAMETER

2-chlorophenol

2, 4-dinitro phenol

DETECTIONLIMITC'̂ /8)

3.3

42


A- 5

ND

ND

A- 7

ND

ND

A- 8

ND

ND

t

A- 9

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Levelceuterat^d phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (3S1) - Level2-f lucrophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2.) - Levelnentaf luoro-fuer.ol - Recovery

7/24&26/S49/18/849/21/842.0 UE/E

74%12 UE/E80%

12 UE/E62%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E

110%12 UE/E61%

12 UE/E47%

7/248,26/849/18/849/21/842.0 UE/E

130%12 UE/E-80%

12 UE/E55%

7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E

110% {12 UE/E32%

12 UE/E25%

FOR RECRA Eirv iROKHENTAL LABORATORIES

DATEff

A-4

RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754

3000?3

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMEli.K

2-chlorophcnol

2 , 4-din'! trophenol

DETECTIONLIMIT(UR/g)

3.3

42


A-10

ND

ND

A-ll

ND

ND

A-12

ND

ND

A-13

ND

ND

ADDITIONAI. SAMPLE INFORMATIONSa-.r-le DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f lueroDhenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpn-t-.ir luorc'Dhenol - Recovery

7/24&26/S49/18/849/21/842.0 UB/E

94%12 U£/E70%

12 UE/E56%

7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g

93%12 ue/e45%

12 ue/e36%

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g

76%12 ue/E77%

12 UE/g65%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g140% !12 u?/g68%

12 ue/g60%

FOK RECRA ElT^IRONTiENTAL LABORATORIES

DATE

A-5

RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754 300024

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

2-chlorophenol

2 , 4-dinitrophenol

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)

3.3

42


A-14

ND

ND

A-15

ND

ND

A-16

ND

ND

A-17

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION| Sample Date! Extras tier. DateI Anslvsis Date! Internal Standard (IS) - Level! deuterated phenanthrene - RecoveryI Surrogate Standard (SS1) - Leveli 2-f luorophenol - Recoveryi Surrogate Standard (SS2) - Level

•Dcncafluorophenol - Recovery

7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g

88%12 yg/g51%

12 ug/g61%

7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g

65%12 ug/g90%

12 yg/g58%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g

87%12 yg/g -55%

12 yg/g0%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g120%12 yg/g55%

12 yg/g60%

FOP. RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

DATE

s Avfrkl

i J i

fib A-6


I.D. #84-754300025

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

2-chlorophenol

2 , 4-dini trophenol

DETECTIONLIMIT(UE/E)

3.3

42


T-4

ND

ND

T-7

ND

ND

T-ll

ND

ND

T-18

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelcentaf luorophenol - Recovery

_9/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E

120%12 UR/E62%

12 MR/R53%

7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 UE/E

110%12 UE/E43%

12 uR/a25%

7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g

110%12 UE/E90%

12 UR/P,76%

7/27/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g

72%12 ug/R88%

12 UR/R71%

FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

DATE

i#U<<

A-7RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754300026

Page i or 2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERacenaohtheneacer.aphthyleneanthracenebenzo ( a ) an thracene

benzo(a)pyrenebenzo (g , h , i ) pervlene

benzo (k) f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalene

- chrysenedibenzo (a, h) anthracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene

1 , 3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2, 4-dinitro toluene

2,6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/e)1.93.51.97.82.5A.I2.51.92.52.51.91.9A. 45.7

1.92.21.91.9


A-l

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

A-2

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

A-3

NDND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

A-4

ND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

(Continued)


A-8 30002?

rage 01

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERnaphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepvrene

1,2, 4-tr ichlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)1.6

1.925251.91.91.9 .


A-lND

NDNDNDND

ND

ND

A-2ND

NDNDND

NDND

ND

A- 3ND

ND

NDND

ND

NDND

A-4ND

NDND

ND

ND

NDND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecafluorobipjhenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fluorobiphenyl - Recovery

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g91%

12 ug/g67%

10 ug/g66%

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g120%

12 yg/g78%10 ug/g84%

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g98%12 yg/g80%10 yg/g90%

7/24/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g110%12 ug/g100%10 ug/g100%


DATE

/ J


I.D. #84-754300028

of 2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERacenaohtheneacenaphthyleneanthracenebenzo (a) anthracene

benzo(a)pvrenebenzo (g , h , i )pery lenebenzo (k)f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalenechrysenedibenzo (a, h) anthracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene

1 , 3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2,4-dinitrotoluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(vg/g)1.9

3.51.97.82.54.12.51.92.52.51.91.94.45.71.92.21.91.9


A-5NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

A-7ND

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

A-8ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

A-9ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

NDND

NDND

NDND

(Continued)


A-10 300029

rage 01 «.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERnaphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodinethylanineN-ni.trosodi-N-propylami.neN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1,2, 4-trichlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/g)1.61.925251.91.91.9 •


A-5NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

A- 7NDNDND

NDNDNDND

A-8NDNDNDNDNDNDND

A-9NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

s~ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2- f luorobiphenyl - Recovery

7/24&26/$49/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g74%

12 yg/g77%

10 ug/g77%

7725/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%

12 ug/g100%10 pg/g

7/246.26/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g130%12 ug/g88%10 ug/g

100% ! 98%

7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%12 ug/g38%10 ug/g38%


DATE

A-ll

HECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754 300030

rage i 01

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERacenaphthenea cenaph thy leneanthracenebenzo (a) anthracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenso (g , h , i )pery lenebenzo (k) f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalene

\ chrysepedibenzc (a, h) anthracenei , 2-dichlorobenzene1 , 3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2,4-dinitrotoluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenefluoranthenefluorenehexachlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(UB/g)1.93.51.97.82.54.12.51.92.52.51.91.94.45.71.92.21.91.9


A-10

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

A-ll

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

A-12

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDKD

NDND

A-13

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND 'NDNDNDNDND'NDNDNDND

(Continued)

RiCRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754

A-12

300031

of 2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERnaphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethvlamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1,2, 4-trichlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)1.61.925251.91.91.9 -


A-10ND

NDND

ND

NDND

ND

A-llND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND

A-12ND

NDNDND

NDND

ND

A-13ND

NDNDND

NDND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalvsis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fiuorobiphenyl - Recovery

7/24426/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g94%

12 yg/g63%

10 yg/g

7/24&26/S49/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g93%

12 yg/g84%

10 yg/g

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g76%

12 yg/g84%

10 yg/g80% ! 87% | 90%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 ng/g140%12 yg/g100%10 yg/g100%


DATE^ I

ft* A-13RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754

300032

Page i or 2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETERacenaphtheneacenanhthvleneanthracenebenzo (a) anthracene

benzo(a)pyrene

benzo ( g , h , i ) pery lene

benzo (k)f luoranthene2-chloronaphthalene

' chrvsened ihenzo (a ,h) anthracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene

1 , 3-d ichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2,4-dinitrotoluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlcrobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/g)1.93.5

1.97.8

2.5A.I2.5

1.92.52.51.91.94.45.71.92.21.91.9


A-14

NDNT)

ND

KB

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

A-15

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

A-16

ND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

. ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

A-17

ND

NDND

NDND

NDND

NDND

NDNDND

NDND

NDND

NDND

(Continued)


I.D. #84-754

A-14300033

01 2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

naphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1 , 2 ,4-trichlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(Ug/g)

1.61.925251.91.91.9 ,


A-14ND

NDNDND

NDND

ND

A-15ND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND

A-16ND

NDND

ND

NDND

ND

A-17ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecafluorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fluorbbiphenyl - Recovery

7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 ug/g88%12 yg/g89%10 yg/g94%

7/25/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g65%12 pg/g85%10 pg/g83%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g87%12 yg/g60%10 yg/g76%

7/25/849/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g120%

12 yg/g100%

10 yg/g110%


DATE


I.D. #84-754300034

rage i 01

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

acenaphtheneacenaphthyleneanthracenebenzo ( a ) an thracenebenzo(a)pyrenebenzo ( g , h , i ) perylenebenzo (k) f luoranthene

2-chloronaphthalenechrysene

dibenzo (a, h) an thracene1 , 2-dichlorobenzene

1,3-dichlorobenzene1 , 4-dichlorobenzene2 , 4-dinitro toluene2 , 6-dinitrotoluenef luoranthenef luorenehexachlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(UR/8)1.93.51.97.82.5A.I2.51.92.52.51.91.94.45.7

1.92.21.91.9


T-4ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

T-7ND

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

T-ll

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ND

NDNDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

T-18

NDND

NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

NDND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

(Continued)


I.D. #84-754

A-16 300035

of 2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

naphthalenenitrobenzeneN-nitrosodimethylamineN-nitrosodi-N-propylamineN-nitrosodiphenylaminepyrene1,2, 4- trichlorobenzene

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/g)1.61.925251.91.91.9 -


T-4

ND

NDNDND

ND

NDND

T-7ND

ND

NDND

NDND

ND

T-llND

NDNDND

ND

NDND

T-18ND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - LevelDecafluorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-fluorobiphenvl - Recovery

—9/18/849/20/842.0 yg/g120%

12 yg/g69%

10 ug/g76%

7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%

12 yg/g40%10 ug/g56%

7/27/849/18/849/20/842.0 ug/g110%

12 vg/g85%10 yg/g67%

7/24/849/18/849/21/842.0 yg/g72%12 yg/g90%10 yg/g87%


DATEV U

A-17


300036

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

benzenecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzenechloroformmethyl chloride

tetrachloroethylenetoluene

1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane1,1, 2-trichloroethane:richloroethvlene

DETECTIONLIMIT(ye/kg)50505050505050505050

SAl-fPLE IDENTIFICATION

A-l

NDND

NDNDNDNDNDND

NDND

A- 2NDND

ND

NDND

NDNDND

NDND

A-3NDND

ND

NDNDNDNDND

NDND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbroraochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/24/848/16/8440 yg/kg46%40 yg/kg33%40 yg/kg35%

7/24/848/16/8440 yg/kg1%40 yg/kg37%40 yg/kg30%

7/24/848/16/8440 ye/ke110%40 yg/kg77%40 yg/kg100%


DATE

A-18


I.D. #84-75430003?

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

beruenecarbon totrachloridechleirobenzenechloroformcethvl chloride

tetrachloroethvlenetoluene1,1, 1-trichloroethane

1 , 1 , 2-tr ichloroethanetri^hlorcethylene

DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/kg)50505050505050505050


A-4

NDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

A- 5

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

NDND

A-7NDND

ND

NDND

ND

NDND

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis Dateinternal Standard - LevelbroTDnrhlornnethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-brcne-i-chicropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-cichlorobutane - Recovery

7/24/848/14/8440 ug/kg80%40 ug/kg76%

40 ug/kg40%

7/24&26/S48/17/8440 ug/kg27%

40 ug/kg68%40 ug/kg77%

7/25/848/16/8440 wg/kg71%

40 vg/kg56%

40 ug/kg57%


DATEv g

A-19

RECfIA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754

300038

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

benzenecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzer.echloroformirethyl chloride

tetrachloroethylenetolue-u=1 , 1 ,1-trichloroethane1.1, 2-trichloroethane•trichlcreethvler.e

DETECTIONLIMIT(US/kg)

50505050505050505050


A-8NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND

A-9NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

A-10NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-broao-l-chloropropsne - RecoveryIntfcn-i.il Standard - Level

i 1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/246.26/848/15/8440 UE/kE43%40 uE/kR18%40 ug/kg29%

7/24&26/S48/17/8440 UE/kE10%

40 UB/kB19%40 we/kg23%

7/24&26/S48/16/8440 uE/ke4%40 ue/kE12%40 UE/kE49%


DATE


I.D. #84-754300039

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

benzenecarbon tetrachloridechlorobenzenechloroformmethyl chloridetetrachloroethylenetoluene1,1, 1-trichloroethane1,1, 2-tr ichloroethanetrichloroethylene

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/kg)50

505050505050505050


A-llNDNDNDND

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

A-12NDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDNDNDND

A-13NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/24&26/S48/15/8440 yg/kg61%40 yg/kg33%40 yg/kg30%

7/24/848/15/8440 yg/kg84%40 yg/kg67%40 yg/kg67%

7/25/848/16/8440 yg/kg6%40 yg/kg30%40 yg/kg48%


DATE jfatit.—:

A-213ECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754300040

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

benzene

carbon tetrachloride

chlorobenzenechloroform

methyl chloridetetrachloroethvlene

toluene

1 , 1 ,1-trichloroethane1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane

trichloroethylene

DETECTIONLIMIT(pg/kg)

505050

50

505050

505050


A-14ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

A-15

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

A-16ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND 1

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSar.ple Date j 7/25/84Analysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-c'iloropropane - RacovervInternal Standard - Level1 , 4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

8/15/8440 yg/kg

20%40 ye/kg

51%40 yR/kR

40%

7/25/848/15/8440 ug/kg

25%40 ug/kg

22%40 ug/kR

34%

7/25/848/15/8440 ue/kR

68%40 yg/kg

75%40 yg/kg

57%


DATE

A-22


I.D. #84-754

300041

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAZL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY


PARAMETER

benzene


chlorobenzene

chloroform

methvl chloride

tetrachloroethylene

toluene

1,1, 1-trichloroethane

1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane

trichlorcethvlene

DETECTIONLIMIT(yg/kg)50505050505050505050


A-17

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

T-4

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

T-7ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSarr.cle DateAnaivsis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,^-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/25/848/14/84

40 VK/kE71%

40 PE/kE61%

40 PR/kg100%

—8/16/8440 uE/ke

57%40 uE/kE

46%40 ug/kg

48%

7/27/848/15/8440 ug/kg

68%40 uE/ke

57%40 uE/ke

10%


DATE

/li&^fjtew'

A-23


300042

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

benzenecarbon tetrachloride


methyl chloridetetrachloroethvlene

toluene1,1, 1-trichlcroethane1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethanetrichloroethvlene

DETECTIONLIMIT(ug/kg)50505050505050505050


T-llND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

T-18BDL

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

T-21

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - Levelbromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/27/848/15/8440 ME /kg

9%40 PR/kg

10%40 UR/kR

6%

7/27/848/17/8440 uE/kE

53%40 MR/kR

38%40 pR/kR

27%

7/27/848/17/8440 VR/kE

53%40 PR/kR

32%40 UR/kR

33%


DATE

A-24

BECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754 300043

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPKY


PARAMETER

Aldrinci-BHC

e-BHC

6-BHC

V-BHC

Chlordane

4,4' ODD

4,4' DDE4,4' DOT

Dieldi'in

FCB - 1016

PCS - 1221

PCB - 1232PCS - 1242

PCE - 1248PCB - 1254

PCB - 1260

UNITS OF MEASURE

yg/gyg/g

yg/g

yg/g

yg/gyg/gyg/g

yg/g

yg/g

yg/g

yg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/g

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)

A-l(7/24/84)<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4

<4<2<2<2<2

A- 2(7/24/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<4<4<2<2<2<2

A- 3(7/24/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<2<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

A-4(7/24/84)<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<4<4<2<2<2<2


DATE

A-25


I.D. #84-7543000^4

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY


PARAMETER

Aldrin

a-EHC

n-BKC

6-BKC

Y-BHC

Chlordane

4,4' DDD

4,4' DDE

4,4' DOT

Dicldrin

PCI', - 1016

PCB - 1221

PCB - 1232

PCB - 1242PCB - 1248PCB - 1254

PCB - 1260

UNITS OF MEASURE

ug/gPg/g

MS;/&M Z, / g

U6/g

vg/eug/gug/gvg/gug/gU ° / £

Ug/8

V15/8ug/gug/gug/g


A-5'7/24&26/S4)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4

<2<2<2

Ufi/R S <2

A-7(7/25/84)<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4

<2<2<2<2

A- 8C7/24&26/84)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

A-9(7/24&26/S4)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<0.2<0.2 !

<0.2 |<0.2 1<2 |<4 ;<4

-1<2 !1

<2

<2 ;


DATE

A-26


I .D. #84-7543000/15

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Aldrinci-BHC

c-BHC

5-BHC

-,-BHC

Chlordane4,4' DDD

4,4' DDE

4,4' DOT

Dieldrin

tCB - 1016

FCB - 1221

PCB - 1232

FCB - 1242

PCB - 1248PCB - 1254

PCB - 1260

UNITS Or MEASURE

ug/gV.V./V,

US/8U'g/g

Ug/g

ug/gyp/sujj./e

y?/gus/e

,̂/g

i'.s/Eug/g

us/gUg/g

UK/P

'•Jg/g


A-10(7/246,26/84)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2

"<0.2

<0.2<2

<4<4<2<2<2<2

A-ll(7/24&26/S4)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

A- 12(7/24/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

A-13(7/25/84)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2 i

<0.2 :

<2 !<4<4<2<2

<2 i

<z i


DATE

A-27


I.D. //S4-754 300046

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Aldrin

a-BHC

6-BHC

c-BHC

>-BKC

Chlcrdane

4, A' DDD

4,4' DDE

4,4' DDT

Dieldrinpen _ ; r- 1 (-.r s_ u * vj i. O

PCE - 1 ° ~* I

PCB - 1232

PCS - 1242

PCB - 1248FC3 - 1254

PC3 - 1260

UNITS OF MEASURE

yg/gyg/g

Ug/g

ug/iUg/g

Pg/8

U8/g

Ug/g

ug/gug/g

yg/f?yg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/gyg/g

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE'1

A-14(7/25/84)<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2

<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

A-15(7/25/84)<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2

<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2

<2<2

A-16(7/25/84)<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2

<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

A-17(7/25/84)<0.2<0.2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2

<0.2<0.2<2<4<4

<2 !<2<2

<2 j

fa*FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

DATE

A-28


7 . D . /(RA-7S4

/ I

30004?

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



1

PARAMETER

Aldrin

ct-BHC

c-RKC

6-BHC

•Y-BHC

Chlordane4,4' DDD

4,4' DDE

4,4' DDT

Dieldrin

?CE - 1016PCS - 1221

FCB - 1232FCB - 1242

PCB - 1248PCB - 1254PCB - 1260

UNITS OF MEASURE

ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gUg/g

ug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/gug/g


T-4(-)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2"<0.2<0.2

<2<4<4<2<2<2<2

T-7(7/27/84)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<4<4<2<2<2<2

T-ll(7/27/84)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<4<4<2<2<2<2

T-18(7/27/84)

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2

<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<2<4

<4<2<2<2<2

I


DATE

A-29

RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI .D. #84-754

C2'

300048

ANALYTICAL RESULTS




A-l

A- 2

A- 3

A- 4

A- 4 Dup

A- 5

A- 7

A- 8

A-9

A-10

A-ll

A-12

A-13

A-U

A-15

A-16

A- 16 Dup

A-17

T-4

T-7

T-ll

T-18

DETECTION LIMIT(pg/g)

5.0

5.0

5.05.05.05.05.0

5.05.05.05.05.05.05.05.0

5.05.05.05.05.0

5.05.0

COMPOUND

PHENANTHRENE

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND


DATE

RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIESI.D. #84-754 additional

A-30 300049

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


Report Date: 9/.?7/8i

i1

PAPAMETEFl

Total ArsenicTotal CadmiumTotal LeadI-. _.. 1 VJ -t. .1i*. i. L.*. . 1 1 <_ -'*i_-l.

UNITS OFMEASURE

US/.?

ng/gyg/g1 1 .-» / o— ™. , -,

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)A-l

O/24/84)

<o.i<0.1<0.10.470

A- 2C7/24/84)

<0.09<0.09<0.090.900

A— 3(7/24/84)

<0.09<0.09<0.09<0.1

A-4C7/24/84)

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1

r^> it c7 'FOE. RKCSA ENVIROJMEKTAL LABORATORIESV } I J\J ' 7^ ^Vyxv

DATE


I.D. #84-754300050

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Total ArsenicTotal CadmiumTotal LeadTo t a 1 Nickel

UNITS OFMEASURE

ug/gWg/g

Ug/g

Pg/8

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)A-5

(7/24-26/84)0.885<0.090.1731.70

A- 7(7/25/84)0.930<0.080.1001.40

A- 8(7/24-26/84)

<0.1<0.10.196

3.69

A- 9(7/24-26/84)

<0.1<0.1<0.16.17

FOR EECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

DATE

ft* A-32RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754300051

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Total ArsenicTotal Cadmium

Total Lead

Total Nickel

UNITS OFMEASURE

Pg/g

Ug/g

Wg/g

Ug/R


(7/24-26/841

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

0.461

A-lln/24-26/841)

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

0.585

A-12(7/24/841

1.08

<0.1

0.374

3.11

A-13(7/25/841

<0.09

<0.09

0.123

1.25

FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL, LABORATORIES

DATE


I.D. #84-754

300052

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Total Arsenic

Total CadmiumTotal Lead

Total Nickel

UNITS OFMEASURE

ug/gUg/g

Pg/g

Wg/g


(7/25/84)

<0.08

<0.08

<0.08

0.128

A-15(7/25/84)

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

1.05

A-16(7/25/84)

<0.1

<0.1<0.1<0.1

A-17(7/25/84)

0.394

<0.1

0.197

4.88


DATE

.\J.


I.D. #84-754300053

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Tctal ArsenicTotal Cadmium

Total Lead

Tc-tnl Nickel

UNITS OFMEASURE

UR/g

Ug/g

ug/R

us/K

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)T-4

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1

0.466

T-7(7/27/84)

<0.1<0.10.1570.452

T-ll(7/27/84)

<0.1<0.10.1730.787

FOR KliCRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES V-X L u (/ x

EATE

A-35


300054

ANALYTICAL RESULTS



PARAMETER

Total ArsenicTotal Cadmium

Total Lead

Total Nickel

UNITS OFMEASURE

Ug/gVg/gUg/g

Ug/g

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION (DATE)T-18

(7/27/84 ">

<0.1

<0.1

0.1760.470

T-21(7/27/841*

<0.2

<0.2

0.259

0.212

FOR RECRA ENVIRONMENTALNTAL LABORATORIES V-^i x \J ' / /


I.D. #84-754

300055

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


QUALITY CONTROL


EXTRACTABLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFMETHOD BLANK

COMPOUNDIDENTIFICATION

2-chlorophenol1,3-dichlorobenzene

2,4-dichlorophenoldi-n-octylphthalate

f luoranthenenaphthalenenitrobenzene

ng OFSPIKE

50505050505050

ngRECOVERED

2944

1840364335

%RECOVERY

58

883080728670

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATION

L .

Extraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpentaf luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - Leveldecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-f luorobiphenyl - Recovery

9/18/849/21/8420 ug/1100%

120 ug/161%

120 ug/124%

120 ug/180%

100 ug/178%


DATE


I .D. #84-754300056

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


QUALITY CONTROL


EXTRACTABLE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE A-17


2-chlorophenol

1 , 3-dichlorobenzene2 , 4-dichlorophenoldi-n-octylphthalatef luoranthenenaphthalene

nitrobenzene

2,4, 6-trichlorophenol

ng OFSPIKE5050505050

50

5050

ngRECOVERED

54

26

57

2511

31

3558

%RECOVERY

108

521145022 '62

70 !

116

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateExtraction DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard (IS) - Leveldeuterated phenanthrene - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS1) - Level2-f luorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS2) - Levelpentafluorophenol - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS3) - Leveldecaf luorobiphenyl - RecoverySurrogate Standard (SS4) - Level2-f luorobiphenyl - Recovery

7/25/849/27/849/27/842.0 ug/g

110%12 ug/g52%

12 ug/g55%

12 ug/g50%

10 ug/g60%


DATE


I.D. #84-754300057

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


QUALITY CONTROL


VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE A-2


benzenecarbon tetrachloride

chlorobenzenechloroformmethvl chloride


1 ,1 , 1-trichloroethane

1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethane

trichloroethvlene

ng OFSPIKE

1AOO1400

1400

1400

140014001400

1400

14001400

ngRECOVERED

3601201101403308820054160140

%RECOVERY

268.67.81024

6.314

3.911

10

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/24/848/20/8440 yg/kg8%

40 Lg/'kg8%

40 yg/kg26%


DATE

•VL


I .D. #84-754

A-39 300058

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTRQMETRY

QUALITY CONTROL




benzene

carbon teLrachloridechiorcbenzene

chloroformimethvl chloride

tetrachloroethvlene

toluene

1 ,1 ,1-trichloroethane .

1,1. 2- trichl oroethane

cr i.'?.hl'.>i\>titiivleri£

ng OFSPIKE

1400

1400

1400

1400140014001400

1400

1400

1400

ngRECOVERED

210

11012035021080140

160210150

t"/»

RECOVERY

15 |7.88.625

i155.7

1011 "*

15

. » - J

I.

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INTORMc'.TlONScnit>le DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelEromochloromt thane - Recoveryl:it 2rn£l SU'.niarc; - Level2-hicmo-l-chlurGpropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 .4- dichlorcbuvane - Recovery

7/24S.26/848/16/8440 yg/kg387.

4u 'jR/.-.c.30%

40 ug/kg38%

FOR RECRA ENA' . LABORATORIES

DATil


T . D .

300059

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


QUALITY CONTROL




benzene

carbon tetrachloridechlorobenzenechloroformmethvl chloride


1,1 ,1-trichloroethane -1,1, 2-trichloroethanetrichloroethvlene

ng OFSPIKE1400

1400

1400140014001400

1400

1400

14001400

ngRECOVERED

650

560530950530410470

600400600

%RECOVERY

4640

3868382933432843

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 , 4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/25/848/15/8440 ug/kg56%40 u:z/kg38%40 ug/kg30%


DATE

A-41

i RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

T . D . m-754300060

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


QUALITY CONTROL


VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-18


benzene



methvl chloridetetrachloroethylenetoluene

1 ,1 , 1-trichloroethane •

1,1 ,2-trichloroethanetric-hloroethvlene

ng OFSPIKE14001400

140014001400

1400

1400

1400

140014QG

ngRECOVERED

330280150360

380130210500200170

%RECOVERY

232011

26279.3153614

12

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1 ,4-dichlorobutane - Recovery

7/27/848/20/8440 ug/kg37%

40 iic/ke18%40 vg/kg20%


DATE


A-42 300061

ANALYTICAL RESULTS


QUALITY CONTROL

Report Date: 9/27/8A

VOLATILE RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-21


benzene



methyl chloride

tetrachloroethylenetoluene1 , 1 , 1-trichloroethane

1 ,1 ,2-trichloroethanetrichloroethvlene

ng OFSPIKE

1AOO

1400

1400

140014001400

1400

1400

14001400

ngRECOVERED490180300

630580310450460390350

%RECOVERY

35

132145412232

332825

ADDITIONAL SAMPLE INFORMATIONSample DateAnalysis DateInternal Standard - LevelBromochloromethane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level2-bromo-l-chloropropane - RecoveryInternal Standard - Level1,4-dichlorobutane - Recoverv

7/27/848/20/8440 ng/kg92%40 ye/kg41%40 ug/kg31%


DATE


T . D . #84-7543000R2

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.GAS CHROMATOGRAPHYQUALITY CONTROL


RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-4


p,p' DDD

p,p' DDEp,p' DOT

ng OFSPIKE0.480.480.48

ngRECOVERED

0.370.370.37

.%RECOVERY

777777

RECOVERY ANALYSIS OFSAMPLE T-5


Aroclor 1016

ng OFSPIKE

10

ngRECOVERED

8.8

%RECOVERY

88


DATE


I.D. #84-754300063

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.QUALITY CONTROL


REPLICATE ANALYSES

PARAMETER

Total Arsenic

Total Cadmium

Total Lead

Total Nickel

SAMPLEI.D.

A-4

A- 16A-4A-16A-4A-16A-4A-16

UNITS OFMEASURE

Pg/g

Vg/g

vg/gug/gMg/g

yg/gug/gyg/g

VALUE1

<0.1

<0.1

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1

VALUE2

<0.1<0.1<0.1

<0.1<0.1

<0.1<0.1<0.1

MEAN

<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1

<0.1<0.1

STANDARDDEVIATION

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

-

PERCENTCOEFFICIENT

OF VARIATION_

_

_

_

_

_

_

1


DATE

A-45 300064RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I.D. #84-754

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.QUALITY CONTROL


RECOVERY ANALYSIS

PARAMETER

Total Arsenic

Total Cadmium

Total Lead

Total Nickel

SAMPLEIDENTIFICATION

A-12

T-4

A-12

T-4

A-12

T-4

A-12

T-4

Mg OFSPIKE

100

100

1,000

1,000

100100100100

ugRECOVERED

65

39980

96085

3912595

%RECOVERY

65

39989685

3912595

L-


DATE

*ECRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES

I .D. #84-754A-46

300065

smc martin inc. - us environmental protection agency · smc martin inc. report on biological...

Documents