small-group teaching
DESCRIPTION
Small-Group Teaching. Centre for Educational Development. Session learning outcomes. By the end of this session, you will have: identified and discussed characteristics of small group teaching, within your own subject - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
1
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Small-Group Teaching
Centre for Educational Development
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
2
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Session learning outcomesBy the end of this session, you will have:• identified and discussed characteristics of small
group teaching, within your own subject • identified some common problems associated
with small-group teaching and evaluated some potential tutor interventions
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
3
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Session overview• Introduction & Context• Disciplinary Contexts• Problems in small-group teaching• Teaching through discussion• Review
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
4
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
What we are specifically not engaging with in this session…
• Issues of students working in groups together on assessed tasks, and theories of group formation, team roles etc.
• but see http://www.learnhighergroupwork.com/
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
5
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Small Group Teaching - Context• Types/’genres’ include:
– ‘tutorials’, ‘seminars’, ‘labs’, ‘fieldwork’, ‘online discussion groups’, Problem-based learning (PBL) groups, action learning sets, workshops, syndicates…
• Sizes of ‘small’ groups can vary considerably
• Purpose and role may vary considerably
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
6
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
What size of group would you consider not to be a “small” group ?
A. 10 – 15B. 15 – 20C. 20 – 25D. 25 – 30E. 30 - 35
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
7
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Context – educational role• In comparison to large-group teaching,
small group teaching offers more opportunity for interaction and engagement:– tutor-student interaction– student-student interaction
• Learning in a social context
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
8
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Context - educational role• Favoured for developing higher order attributes:
– Problem solving– Critical thinking– Self-Awareness– ‘Functioning’ rather than ‘Declarative’ knowledge (Biggs &
Tang, 2007)
• Particularly through:– Discussion– Practical application– Relation to real-world events & experiences
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
9
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Contextual factors• Size of group• Location, room, layout, furniture,
equipment• Characteristics and diversity of group
• Resource & staffing issues to address
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
10
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Disciplinary contextsWhat is the situation at your institution with
regard to small group teaching?
Here are a few questions to consider.
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
11
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Disciplinary contextsIndividual questions
– What types of small-group teaching are you involved in at your institution?
– Are there typical ‘ways of practicing’? If so, what are they?
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
12
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Disciplinary contexts
– Are you aware of any examples of what you would consider to be innovative small-group teaching practice at your institution?
– What are the typical issues or challenges associated with small-group teaching in your context?
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
13
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Problems in Small-Group Teaching (Ramsden, 2003: 149)
• teacher lectures rather than conducts discussion• teacher talks too much• difficult encouraging students to talk• discussion limited to responses to tutor questions• if preparation is required, student don’t do it• one student too dominant/ too quiet• student focus is on solutions/answers more than
complexity
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
14
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Teaching & Learning Through Critical Discussion (Garrison & Archer, 2000)
• Allows students to listen, integrate new ideas, critique.
• Discussion phases:– Early – identifying issues– Middle – searching for resolution– Late – evaluating conclusions
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
15
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Critical Discussion (Garrison & Archer, 2000)
• Discussion develops higher thinking skills, in an environment where students can relate to interests and experiences - links ‘cognitive’ and ‘affective’ learning outcomes
• “A distinct shift from the excessively teacher-centred approach often associated with the lecture.”
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
16
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Establishing group rulesOne way to help make small group work a success is to establish some
ground rules at the first session.Which of the following rules do you think is the most important:
A. Rudeness is not acceptableB. If you can’t attend, you should let your tutor knowC. The session should begin on timeD. Everyone is responsible for making the session a successE. Everyone is expected to prepare and to have read the required
texts beforehand
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
17
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Other process techniquese.g. Race, 2007: 151-154– Rounds– Buzz groups– Syndicates– Snowballing– Pyramiding
– Fishbowls– Brainstorming– Pair Dialogues– Leave the room
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
18
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Solutions to the problems? (Ramsden, 2003: 149-151)
“At this point it is usual to provide a list of recipes designed to overcome these familiar difficulties. There are many effective techniques…But none of them will succeed for long unless you clearly understand the reasons for the problems. Just for now, forget about detailed solutions: think about what effective teaching consists of and how you would try to implement its prescriptions…”
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
19
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
ReviewBiggs and Tang (2007: 105):
“It helps to think of lectures and tutorials as situations, in which a range of teaching/learning activities can take place, rather than prescriptions for a manner of teaching.”
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
20
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Suggested reading• Biggs & Tang - Chapter 8, pp. 140-143• Ramsden - Chapter 9, pp. 149-151• Race - Chapter 4• Learn Higher Group Work
http://www.learnhigher.ac.uk/learningareas/groupwork/home.htm
• English Subject Centre – Seminar Teaching:http://www.english.heacademy.ac.uk/explore/resources/seminars/index.php
• David Jaques (Oxford Brookes):http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/2_learntch/small-group/index.html
• Small Group Teaching (Nottingham University):http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/smallgroup/
Centre for Educational DevelopmentORHEP Project
21
www.orhep.brad.ac.uk
www.orhep.brad.ac.ukThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
References• Biggs. J. and Tang, C (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning
at University, Third Edition, Maidenhead, Open University Press.
• Garrison, D.R. & Archer, W. (2000) A Transactional Perspective on Teaching and Learning, Oxford, Pergamon.
• Race, P. (2007) The Lecturer’s Toolkit, Third Edition, London & New York, Routledge.
• Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, Second Edition, London & New York, Routledge Falmer.