small group collaborations generating neural connections via social connections jim therrell, ph.d.,...

16
Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT) NFO, August 21, 2012

Upload: everett-martin

Post on 31-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Small Group Collaborati ons

Generating Neural Connectionsvia

Social Connections

Jim Therrell, Ph.D., DirectorFaculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

NFO, August 21, 2012

Page 2: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Engaging. . .“If [students] can’t learn the way we teach, maybe we

should teach the way they learn.” -Ignacio Estrada

“I always found myself unable to think as a single person.” -Kurt Lewin

“The extraordinary power of interactivity is to get people thinking through doing and doing well by thinking.”

-Michael Allen (Guide to e-Learning, 2003, p. 312)

Page 3: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Integrated Course Design

Learning Goals

Teaching & Learning Activities

Feedback & Assessment

S I TU A T I O N A L F A C T O R S

Page 4: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

(Anxiety / Groan Zone)

(Boring / Drone Zone)

Increasing Engagement

In accord with students’…

You control what’s…

Page 5: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Self-Regulated Learning (SRL)

“Hmmm, which one?”

To the extent that students saw their academic tasks as more important than competing alternatives, they were more likely to stay on task (Bembenutty, 2009).

When students feel competent, and to the extent that they internalize the value of pursuing the academic goal, the more likely they are to delay gratification (Bembenutty, 2009).

Page 6: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

The 2-Step to Self-Regulation

1. Facilitate challenging, problem-based, cooperative / collaborative learning where

students construct their own work

2. Have students reflect on their work

(van Grinsven & Tillema, 2006)

Page 7: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Using evidence-based practices that . . .

... increase student engagement via small groups:

1. Problem-Based Learning2. Team-Based Learning4. Service-Learning5. Game Simulation & Role-Play6. Cooperative / collaborative learning strategies*

Page 8: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Cooperative Methods / 9 Reasons• Compared with competitive and individualistic efforts, results in:

– higher achievement– greater long-term retention of what is learned– greater time on task – more frequent use of critical thinking– more accurate and creative problem-solving– more willingness to take on difficult tasks and persist– more work toward goal accomplishment– more intrinsic motivation– transfer of learning from one situation to another

(D. W. Johnson & R. Johnson, 1989)

Page 9: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Rubric for Small Group Work

• Fully Engages• Understands the “Other” First• Facilitates Harmony• Listens Effectively• Generates Fresh, Appropriate Ideas• Follows Through w/ Responsibilities• Does Quality Work Consistently

(Likert Scale: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor)

Page 10: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Making Initial Connections

1. Group Mapping / Body Voting2. Alpha Circle by 1st Name

3. Alpha Circle in Birthday Order4. Whirling Bagel of Interests5. Group / Partner Choosers

a. Use neutral data (shoes, favorite color, etc.)

b. “Make 7”

Page 11: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

6. M & M’sMost Meaningful part(s) of the reading:

1) Read the chapter/section/article as part of homework, identify 2-4 Most Meaningful parts, then come to class to explain WHY it was an M&M for you (or periodically make it a written exercise);

2) In class: “Please get into groups of 3 or 4.”3) Each student identifies an M & M (and explains WHY) and other students

follow along in their texts (5-10 minutes);4) Each group picks a Recorder & Reporter, then D&D:

-- Debate & Determine the “best” M&M in your group and WHY, 5-10 min;

5) Select Reporters at random to relate to the class the end result of their D&D, including the why;

6) Set timer & display7) Assess the quality of their reports through (a) asking other students to add or

comment, (b) Socratic questions, (c) a mini-lecture, etc.8) Adaptation: the “Most Muddy” point in the reading (and why!).

Page 12: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

7. Concept Mapping

a) flip chart paper and markers for each group (3-4 students)

b) Identify the central concept (“learning”)

c) Guide or demonstrate with another concept showing lines &

relationships

Page 13: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Concept / Cluster MapWhat is your understanding?

Learning Culture

Page 14: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

8. Writing Prompts

“I learned that . . . . . . . . .”“The muddiest point today was . . . . . . . .”[ after some practice, challenge them to form a

well-constructed paragraph per prompt ]

Page 15: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

Skills for Success: 9. Improvisation (Yes & Thank You)

• “We should / We could”• “No, Yes/But, Yes/And”

• “Sound Ball”• “Last Word”

• “One-Word Story”– “The Professor”

• “Advance & Detail”

Page 16: Small Group Collaborations Generating Neural Connections via Social Connections Jim Therrell, Ph.D., Director Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching (FaCIT)

10.

Your Questions, Ideas & Comments