Interactive Metadiscourse Used by The English Departments Students in Introduction Section of Skripsi

Interactive Metadiscourse Used by The English Departments Studentsin Introduction Section of SkripsiHana Hanifah 2215086461Chapter IPurpose 5Chapter IILiterature Review Chapter IILiterature Review Chapter IILiterature Review Chapter IILiterature Review Chapter IILiterature Review Interactive MetadiscourseFunctionsExamplesTransitions Express semantic relation between main clausesIn additions; but; thus; andFrame Markers Refer to discourse acts, sequences or text stagesFinally; to conclude; my purpose is toEndophoric MarkersRefer to information in other parts of the textNoted above; see figure; in section 2EvidentialsRefer to source of information from other textsAccording to X, Z statesCode Glosses Help readers grasp functions of ideational material Namely; such as; e.g.; in other wordsChapter IIIMetodhology

Chapter III Metodhology Data Collection Procedure

Chapter III Metodhology

Table AnalysisNoPrecedingMetadiscourse MarkersFollowingTMFM EMEVCGTotal of Running WordsTotal of IMD usedTotal Educational ProgramLiterature ProgramTotal Educational Program Literature ProgramCategory of InteractiveF per percent Raw1000 W NumberF per percent Raw1000 W NumberTransitional MarkersFrame MarkersEndophoric MarkersEvidentialCode GlossesTotalThe Overall Use of Interactive Metadiscourse by StudentsThe Frequency of Interactive Metadiscourse14No Interactive MetadiscourseIntroduction SectionEducational Program Literature Program TotalPercentageTotalPercentage1.Transition Markers18337.35 %20845.61 %2.Frame Markers12525.51 %9119.96 %3.Endophoric Markers224.49 %33 7.24 %4.Evidential6212.65 %4710.31 %5.Code Glosses9820 %7716.88 %Total 490100 %456100 %

Types of Interactive Metadiscourse Occurrences in the Introduction section

Findings

Total Frequency of Interactive Metadiscourse in Educational and Literature Program Introduction Sections

EducationalProgram LiteratureProgramTotal Total words201171986539982Total Interactive 490456946F per 100024.3622.9547.32Educational Program Literature ProgramCategory of InteractiveF per Percent Raw1000 W Number F per Percent Raw 1000 W NumberTransitional MarkersFrame MarkersEndophoric MarkersEvidentialCode Glosses9.10 37.35 % 1836.21 25.51 % 1251.09 4.49 % 223.08 12.65 % 624.87 20.00 % 9810.47 45.61 % 2084.58 19.96 % 911.66 7.24 % 332.36 10.31 % 473.88 16.88 % 77Total 24.35 100 % 49022.95 100 % 456

Frequency of Interactive Metadiscourse Markers per 1000 words The Occurrences of Interactive Metadiscourse Types in English Department Introduction SectionsWritten by Educational Program Students

Transition Markers in Educational Program Introduction Sections

NoTransitions MarkersFrequency1. Additionally 12.Also263.Although14.And115.As the consequence16.As a result 37.Because 148.Besides29.But1210.Further111.Furthermore812.Hence113.However814.In addition915.In contrast116.In the other head117.Meanwhile418.Moreover919.On the contrary120.On the other hand121.On the other side222.Since 1823.So1224.Still 225.Therefore1626.Thus 527.While1028.Whereas3TOTAL 183The Occurrences of Interactive Metadiscourse Types in English Department Introduction SectionsWritten by Literature Program Students

Transition Markers in Literature Program Introduction Sections

NoTransitions MarkersFrequency1.Also332.Although53.And164.Because 345.Besides46.But127.Further18.Furthermore49.Hence310.However711.In addition1012.Meanwhile313.Moreover714.Since 1715.So916.Therefore1317.Thus 1118.Though419.Too 120.While1021.Whereas122.Yet 3TOTAL 208ConclusionsBased on the first problem statement containing what the types of interactive metadiscourse is used by English Department students in their introduction section of skripsi. The types is used based on Hyland theory, namely Transition Markers, Frame Markers, Endophoric Markers, Evidential, and Code Glosses.Based on the second problem statement containing the Frequency of Interactive metadiscourse markers used by the English Department's students in their introduction section of skripsi. The number of frequencies per 1000 words of total words used in the whole introduction section is 24.36 to 22.95 for the educational programs and literature program.The last problem statement containing how the dominant of interactive metadiscourse markers used by the English Department's students in their introduction section of skripsi. Of the five types of interactive metadiscourse, transition is the most dominant markers used in both educational programs and literature program, which amounted to 37.35% on educational programs and 45.61% in the literature program.

ReferencesCao Feng and GuangweiHu (2014). Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences, 15-31Davaei, R (2013). Interpersonal Metadiscourse in Compositions Written by Iranian ESP Students, 291-300Hyland, K, (2004). Disciplinary Interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 133-151.Hyland, K, (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. New York: Continuum.Hyland, Ken & Tse, Polly, (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25/2, 156-177.Khajavy, G. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of Interactive Metadsicourse. International Journal of Linguistics. Vol 4 No.2.Kripendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis and Its Introduction to Its Methodology: Second Edition. Sage Publications.Laird, D. Writing for Results: Priciples and Practice.Nabifar, S and Maryam, S. The Comparative Investigation of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Used by American and Iranian Editors in English Newspapers, 12-21Nevita, I. (2013). Interactive Metadiscourse in The Background Sections of English Department Students Skripsi. Thesis. Jakarta: State University of Jakarta.Paltridge and Startfield. (2007). Thesis and Dissertation: A Handbook for Supervisors. London and New York: Routledge. Sultan, A. (2011). A Contrastive Study of Metadiscourse is English and Arabic Linguistics research Articles. ACTA LINGUISTICA volume 5, 28-41.

Chart10.45610.19960.07240.10310.1688

Sales

Sheet1SalesTransition Markers45.61%Frame Markers19.96%Endophoric Markers7.24%Evidential10.31%Code Glosses16.88%