slide 1 of 37 modern principles: microeconomics tyler cowen and alex tabarrok copyright © 2010...
TRANSCRIPT
Slide 1 of 37
Modern Principles: Microeconomics
Tyler Cowen
and Alex Tabarrok
Copyright © 2010 Worth Publishers • Modern Principles: Microeconomics • Cowen/Tabarrok
Chapter 8
International Trade
Slide 2 of 37
Introduction• In this chapter we…
Examine why trade is beneficial. Use the supply and demand model
to analyze trade. Evaluate political and economic
arguments that free trade is not necessarily good.
Slide 3 of 37
Why Trade?• Three benefits of trade
1. It allows for division of knowledge.
2. It allows economies of scale and creates greater competition.
3. It increases wealth through the principle of comparative advantage.
• Let’s look at each of these in turn.
Slide 4 of 37
Why Trade?1. Division of Knowledge—Specialization
In a modern economy—more knowledge is used than can reside in a single brain.
• Specialization →↑ knowledge → ↑productivity
• Without trade, specialization is not possible. Trade connects all markets.
• Example: Dog walkers, closet organizers give physicians the time to perfect their skills.
Trade → ↑markets → ↑division of knowledge
• Entrance of China, Eastern Europe, and Russia into world markets → ↑ stock of engineers, scientists → ↑ available knowledge
Slide 5 of 37
Why Trade?2. Economies of Scale and Creating
Competition Economies of Scale—Larger scale
production reduces costs.• Trade → ↑specialization → larger scale
production → economies of scale.• Example: Forming the EU →
↑specialization → larger firms → ↓ prices → EU firms become more competitive in the world market.
Slide 6 of 37
Why Trade?2. Economies of Scale and Creating
Competition (cont.) Trade Creates Competition
• Example: 1980s export restraints by Japanese → ↓ Imports of Japanese cars → Price of Japanese cars ↑ by $1,300 Price of American cars ↑ by $660.
• International competition keeps domestic firms competitive and on their toes. Threat of foreign competition keeps
domestic prices down.
Slide 7 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage
A country has a comparative advantage in producing goods for which it has the lowest opportunity cost.
Allows both trading partners to benefit from trade.
Not to be confused with absolute advantage.
• The ability to produce the same good using fewer inputs than another producer.
Slide 8 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
U.S. requires less labor to produce both → absolute advantage in producing both.
Shirts: Opportunity cost is lowest in Mexico. Computers: Opportunity cost is lowest in U.S. Comparative advantage
• Computers: United States• Shirts: Mexico
Slide 9 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
The theory of comparative advantage says that total production of the two countries will be greatest if both countries:
• Produce what they have a comparative advantage in.
• Import the other goods they want. In this case Mexico will produce shirts and
the U.S. will produce computers. Let’s see how this works with some further
calculations.
Slide 10 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
With No Trade—Suppose U.S. and Mexico allocate the same amount of labor (12 units) to the production of each good.
Slide 11 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
Suppose Mexico completely specializes in producing shirts and the U.S. moves 2 units of labor from producing shirts to computers.
Note: Total production of the two goods is higher thanwithout specialization.
Slide 12 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
With specialization, trade can make both countries better off.
U.S. trades one computer for 3 shirts.
Note: With trade both countries are better off, even thoughthe U.S. has an absolute advantage in both goods.
Slide 13 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
Comparative Advantage and Wages
• Assume that computers sell for $300 and shirts sell for $100 (consistent with the 3 to one trade).
• Average wage in each country can be calculated by using:
• Let’s use this calculation to see how specialization and trade affects wages.
Labor of UnitsofNumber
nConsumptio Total of Value WageAverage =
Slide 14 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
Comparative Advantage and Wages (cont.) Without Trade
With Trade and Specialization
67.216$24
$100)shirts 13()300$computers (13 WageAverage U.S. =
×+×=
50$24
$100)shirts 9()300$computer (1 WageAverage Mexico =
×+×=
50.37$24
$100)shirts6()300$computer (1 WageAverage Mexico =
×+×=
200$24
$100)shirts12()300$computers (12 WageAverage U.S. =
×+×=
Note: Trade and specialization increases wages in both countries
Slide 15 of 37
Why Trade?3. Comparative Advantage (cont.)
Adam Smith on TradeIt is the maxim of every prudent master of a family never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy. The tailor does not attempt to make his own shoes, but buys them of the shoemaker. The shoemaker does not attempt to make his own clothes, but employs a tailor. What is prudence in the conduct of every private family can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom. If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry employed in a way in which we have some advantage.
Slide 16 of 37
CHECK YOURSELF
What does specialization do to productivity? Why?
How does trade let us benefit from the advantages of specialization?Alex Rodriguez is a very good baseball player. He is probably also good at
mowing his lawn. Why would Alex Rodriguez pay someone else to mow his
lawn rather than do it himself?
Slide 17 of 37
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand• We now use the demand and supply model
to determine… The effects of unrestricted trade on...
• Domestic equilibrium price and quantity. • Imports
The effects of tariffs and quotas on the…• Domestic equilibrium price and quantity. • Imports
Let’s turn to the model.
Slide 18 of 37
w/ Free trade:•World price prevails.•Domestic consumption =•Domestic production =
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand
Price
Quantity of semiconductors
P no trade
Free tradeequilibrium
tradefree
Stradefree
D QQ −
tradeno
Q
trade freeSQ
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supplyWorld price
No tradeequilibrium
Domesticproduction
Domestic consumption
Imports
tradefree
DQtradefree
SQ
trade freeDQ
• imports =
Slide 19 of 37
With Tariff:•World price + tariff prevails.•↓Domestic consumption →•↑Domestic production →
Analyzing Trade with Supply and Demand
Price
Quantity of semiconductors
pno trade
tariffS
tariffD QQ −
tradeno
Q
tariffSQ
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supply + tariff
World price+ tariff
Equilibrium w/tariff
↑Domesticproduction
Importsw/ free trade
tariffDQtariff
SQ
tariffDQ
• ↓imports →
World priceWorld Supply
tariff
tradefree
SQ tradefree
DQ
↓ Domestic consumption
Imports w/tariff
• tariff revenue
Slide 20 of 37
The Costs of Protectionism• To simplify we make two assumptions:
1. Tariff eliminates all imports.
2. With free trade, domestic production = zero. Reasonable approximations for sugar.
• A tariff has two effects:1. ↑ domestic production, ↓ domestic
consumption.• Resources are drawn away from more
productive uses to produce sugar.
2. Less is consumed → lower gains from trade.
• Let’s turn to our model again.
Slide 21 of 37
The Costs of Protectionism• Wasted resources and lost gains from trade.Price perpound(in cents)
Quantity(in billions of pounds)
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supply +tariff
World price
Free tradeequilibrium
20
20
9
24
U. S. costs
Worldcosts
Value ofwasted resources
World supply
Lost gains from tradeor deadweight loss
Tariffequilibrium
Slide 22 of 37
The Costs of Protectionism• Wasted resources and lost gains from trade. (cont.)Price perpound(in cents)
Quantity(in billions of pounds)
Domestic demand
Domestic supply
World supply +tariff
World price
20
20
9
24
World supply
Value of wasted resources = [(.20 – .09) x 20]/2 = $1.1 billion
$1.1 billion
Lost gains from trade= [(.20 - .09) x (24 – 20)]/2 = $.22 billion
Slide 23 of 37
The Costs of Protectionism• Conclusions
A tariff reduces economic efficiency because…• The supply of goods is no longer sold by the
sellers with the lowest costs.• Because world suppliers are willing to sell for
less, and U.S. consumers are willing to pay more → mutually profitable gains from trade are prevented by law.
U.S. consumers pay more, and workers in other countries (e.g., Brazil), many of whom are poor, lose income.
Slide 24 of 37
The Costs of Protectionism• One final cost: lobbying
The loss to domestic consumers is greater than the gains to domestic producers.
Why then does congress pass tariffs?• Small number of producers → Benefit per
producer is high• Large number of consumers → Loss per
consumer is low.• Result: return from lobbying to producers is
higher than for consumers. Lobbying diverts resources from more
productive activities.
Slide 25 of 37
CHECK YOURSELF
Who benefits from a tariff? Who loses?
Why does trade protectionism lead to wasted resources?
If there are winners and losers from trade restrictions, why do we hear more often from the people who gain from trade restrictions than from the people who lose?
Slide 26 of 37
Arguments Against International Trade• Most Common Arguments
Trade reduces the number of jobs in the U.S. It’s wrong to trade with countries that use child
labor. We need to keep some industries for reasons
of national security. We need to keep some “key” industries
because of beneficial spillovers onto other sectors.
We can increase U.S. well-being with strategic trade protectionism.
• Let’s look at each of these in turn.
Slide 27 of 37
Arguments Against International Trade• Trade and Jobs
Tariffs raise the price of protected goods.• Consumers have less money to spend on
other goods.• Jobs are lost in other industries—these lost
jobs are hard to see. Increased imports into the U.S. result in higher
exports from the U.S.• The U.S. dollars we spend on other country’s
good are used to buy our goods.• Jobs are created in U.S. exporting industries.
Slide 28 of 37
Arguments Against International Trade• Child Labor
Restricting imports made by child labor may do more harm than good.• Children work out of necessity—what else
will they do?• Often the alternative is worse.
Prostitution Scrounging in refuse dumps
Child labor is a poverty problem not a trade problem.
The next figure shows this.
Slide 29 of 37Slide 29 of 29
Arguments Against International Trade
Slide 30 of 37
Arguments Against International Trade• Trade and National Security
Some industries probably should be protected.
Subject to great abuse—almost every industry can make this argument for protection.
Examples:
• Vaccine production?—probably a good idea.
• Mohair?—are you kidding?
Slide 31 of 37
Arguments Against International Trade• Key Industries
Some industries are characterized by large spillovers to other industries• Example: Computer chips are always used in
some other product. Protection benefits a larger number of
firms. Two comments:
• Subsidy is a better option than a tariff.• Hard to determine which industries are key.
Slide 32 of 37
Arguments Against International Trade• Strategic Trade Protectionism
Government helps domestic firms act like a cartel when they sell to international buyers.• May be able to grab a larger share of the
gains from trade than with free trade.• This can be done either with a…
Tax on exports Quotas on exports
• Success is limited by the number of available substitutes. OPEC succeeds because oil has few
substitutes.
Slide 33 of 37
CHECK YOURSELF
Over the past 30 years, most U.S. garment manufacturing has moved overseas, to places such as India and China, where wages are lower. The result of this shift has been a sizeable drop in the number of garment workers in the United States. While bad for these workers, why has this trend been a net benefit for the United States?
Slide 34 of 37
CHECK YOURSELF
What would happen if the U.S. government decided that computer chip manufacturing was a strategic national industry and provided monetary grants to Silicon Valley companies? Trace the effects of this policy on Silicon Valley companies, foreign competitors, the world market for computer chips, and the cost and benefit to U.S. consumers as a whole.
Slide 35 of 37
Trade and Globalization• Globalization is not new
Roman Empire Revitalized trade routes → European
Renaissance “globalization is the advance of human
cooperation across national boundaries.” (Donald Boudreaux)
Periods of increased trade and the spread of ideas have been among the best for human progress.
Slide 36 of 37
• Specialization and trade create enormous increases in productivity. Increases the total sum of knowledge. Takes advantage of economies of scale.
• Comparative advantage—when a country can produce something at a lower opportunity cost. Every person and every country has a
comparative advantage in something.
• Restrictions on trade waste resources. Consumers lose more than producers gain.
Takeaway
Slide 37 of 37
• Wages are determined by productivity. High productivity countries → high wages. Low productivity countries → low wages. Trade raises wages in both countries.
• We have looked at five arguments for protectionism. Some are valid but have limited applicability.
• Globalization is not new. Human progress has accelerated when
countries have become more connected with trade.
Takeaway