site investigation report and remedial alternatives …

SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT ANDREMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES REPORT

FOR

BROWNFIELD S INVE STIGATIONGENEVA FOUNDRY SITE .

CITY 0F GENEVA, NEW YORK

Submitted By:

Passero Associates, P.C.• 100Libertypoleway

Rochester, NY 14604

and

Larsem Engineer.s700 W. Metro Park

Rochester, NY 14623

Revised August 2000 P.tl` 97] ,

TABI,E OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction ............................ „...„ ............ „...„ ................. „ ............... „ .... n ..... 2

1.1 Pulpose of Report ......................................... „ .................... „ ......... „„ ..... „ .......... „... 2

1.2 Site Background..„ ..................... „ .......................,.................... „„ ....... „ ......... „,.„... 2I.2.1 Site Description...„ ...............,.,... „...„ ............ „ ......... „..„ ................................................ 2

1.2.2 Site History...„...„ .................... „ ............... „ ..........................................-.......................,.. 2

1.2.3 Previous hvestigations ................................................................ „ .......... „ ............... „ .... 3

2.0 Study Area Investigation .... „ ...,........... „.„..„ ..... „„..„.„ ..... „ .... „„ ........... „.„ .... 7

2.1 Surface Features ..................,...,....... „.„ ............ „„ ...... „ ........ „ ......................... „... 7

2.2 Contaminant source hvestigation .....,...... „ ............... ~ ................................. „„ .... 72.2.1 Passive soil Gas ................ „ .................. „ .... 72.2.2 Test pits (Tank Exploration) .................. „.„...„ ......... „.„ ............ „ ....... „ ......... „ ............... 72.2.3 Sump sample ,.............................. ~ ......................... „ .............................................. „„ .... 7

2.2.4 Filled Foundry pit..„ ...... „ ..... „ .... „ ....... „ ................. „ ..,............................................. „.:.. 8

2.3 Meteorological Information..„ .... „ ........... '„ .....,...........................,... „ .... „ .....,. „ .... 82.4 Surface-Water and sediment hivestigation§ ................... „..„ ................. „ ............ 82.5 Geological Investigations ........................................ „.„„ ....... „„.„ ..... „„ ........... „.. 82.6 Soil and vadose zone Investigations...„ .... „„ .... „„ ....,...................... „ ..... „.~ ....... 92.7 Groundwater Investigations .................. „.„ ....... „ ................................................. 92.8 Human populations surveys ..... „ ........ „ .......... „.„ .... „...„..„..„ .... „ .................. „.102.9 Ecological investigations .................... „ .... „ ..................... „ ................................ 10

2.10 hierim Remedial Measure -Drum Removal .................................................... 10

3.0 Physical Characteristics of the Study Area .................,................................. 11

3.1 Geology ............ „ ........................................................ „ ...... „ ...... „ ..... „ ............. „ 11

3.2 Hydrogeology ....................,.. „ ........... „ .................. „ ............ „ .... „...„„ .... „ ...... „„ 113.2.1 Monitoring wells ...........................................,........ „ .... „ .............................................. 11

3.2.2 Groundwater contour. ` ................... „..: ............. „...„ ...... 113.2.3 Hydraulic conductivity ...................................................................... „ ......................... 11

3.3 Residential soil sampling, Geneva Foundry ............... „ .......................... „ ........ 133,3.1 October 1998 .............. „ ............ „ ...... „.. „ ...... „ ........... „ 133.3.2 May 1999 ........ „ ..... „ ....................,......,........................... „ ......................... „ .................. 14

4.0 Nature and Extent of contamination.„ .... „ .................................. „.„ .............. 18

4,1 Passive soil Gas .......... „ .......... „ .,.................. „..„ ....... „ ......... „ ..... „ .................... 18

4.2 Borehole soils .... „ .... „ ........ „...„..„ ..................................................................... 18

4.3 Groundwater ...........................................,.........................................,................. 29

4,4 Disscussions ,....... „„ ..... „...„..„ ........................... : ..... „.,.„ ........ „ ................... „ ..... 33

5.0 Contamination Fate and Transpolf .......... „ .................................................. „33

5.1 Containant persitence ........... „ ........... „...„„ ........................ „ ......................... 345.2 Contaminant Migration-Assessment of Human Exposure pathways„ ............ 34

-I-

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Corit'd)

6.0 Baseline Risk Assessment ....................,.. „ ...,.... „.„ ....... „„..„ .... „ ......... „ ........ 36

6.1 Public Health Evaluation ................ „.„ ................ „ .............. „ ...,.............. „..„ ...... 36

6.2 Envirormental Assessment...„ .............. „ ............ „ ....... „ .............,.... „..„ ..... „ ..... 37

7.0 Summary and co`nclusions .............. „ .....,.....................,.. „.„ .... „ ................. :.37

7.1 Surmay.„ ...... „ ........................ „ ....... „ ............ „.„...„ ...... „.„ ..... „„..„..„ ..,... „ .... 377.I.1 Nature and Extent of contamination ............................ „ ...................... 37

7.2 Envirormental Assessment„ ..............,,...,,........ „ ..........,..............,. 39

- FPl -

FIGURES

1. Regional Map.

2. Passive soil Gas Results

3, Monitoring well/Borehole Location Map

4. Residential soil Location Map

APPENDIX

/1. Photos

4. sump chalysis

6. Filled pit chalysis

4. Drum inventory/Waste Manifests

5. Soil Boring Logs

6. Well construction Diagram

` 7. Residential samples

8. Groundwater contour Map

9. SlugTestData

10.1987 NYSDEC Memorandum

11. NYSDOH June 1987 Inter-Office Memo

12. October 6,1987 NYSDOH Letter

13. NYSDEC September 1995 Field Notes

14. 1995 Recra Analytical Data

15. Geneva Historic Society

- iii -

ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS

New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York State Department of HealthColumbia Analytical ServicesEnvironmental Products & Services

S ite investigationhterim Remedial MeasureRemedial hvestigationFeasibility Study

Analytical Services ProtocolTarget Compound ListTarget chalyte ListMicrograms per Kilogram, or parts per billionParts per BillionMilligram per Kilogram, or parts per millionParts per Million

Volatile Organic CompoundS emivolatile CompoundPolychlorinated8iphenylBenzene/Tolueneflthylbenzene/XyleneMethyl Etdyl Ketone

Hydranlic Conductivity

Laboratory Quatifier indicating estinated value detected below laboratoryQuautification Limit

-|V-

fl

iD

ID

!D

ID

[D

!D

iot

!D

iD

i.,

[q

EXECUTIVE SUM MARY

Passero Associates, P.C. and Larsen Engineers completed the Site Investigation (SI) phase of theNew York State Deparfroent of Environmental Conservation QIYSDBC) Brownfields investigationof the Geneva Foundry Site on Jackson Street in the City of Geneva, New York, pursuant to theContract (Change Order) signed by the City of Geneva on November 30,1998. I/!e worfe ty¢sperf armed in accordance with the NY:SDEC-approved Workplan, Field Sarmpttng Plan, Health &Sofrty Plan, ctlid Qualtry Assuraiice Project Plc[I., dated July 1997.

AIl work was completed .in corif brmance with the New York State Department Of EnvirorlmentalConservation (DEC), Division Of Environmental Renediation, Mtivictpal Assistance EnviroranentalRestc>rcttion Profects "Browrf ield Progran" Procedures Hc[ndbock. .This report f;o{lows the f ormatsuggested in Appendin I Of the BrowITf iueld Procedures Handbook.

The Geneva Foundry Site is in an urban residential area near downtown Geneva, New York. Theinitial phase of fieldwork consisted of a passive soil gas investigation conducted in October 1998(Section 2.6). The soil gas investigation was followed by drilling and sampling nineteen soilborings; six of the soil borings were converted into groundwater monitoring wells. Two rounds ofgroundwater samples were collected for laboratory analysis in April 1999 and June 1999.

An interim Remedial Measure qRAtry consisting of the consolidation, characterization, and removalof numerous drums and assorted containers of an assortment of wastes has been completed. ,4sdiscusse_din§ec_Pop2.10,EPAassignedlD#NYD002216794tothe,CityofGenevaforthewasterremoval, cnd. all Of the cohiatners containing product were remcirved on Septenber 15 . 1999, incorifbrma;neew{thstatecnd,federalregulchons.

Analysis of a sludge sample from the sump inside the Foundry (Section 2.2.3) indicated thepresence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs); afuture RM of sludge removal and sump cleaning is recolnlnended.

Elevarfed surficial levels of metals in residential gardens in the vicinity of the Foundry wereoriginally identified by NYSDEC in June 1986 (Section .1.2.3). Two rounds of residential salnplinghave confirmed elevated metals in surficial soils around the Foundry (Section 3.3). Eye reco"z#erzdfuriker characterizdion Of metals at depth to dete:riirine the apprcipriate scope Of remedialfflecrszfres, Future remediation relative to metals will be evaluated and perfomed in conjunctionwith the NYSDEC and NYSDOH.

The passive soil gas study and analysis of a sump sanple in the southeast comer of the Foundrybuildingindicateapotentialsub-slabsourceareaatthesoutheastcomer.ofthebuilding(Section2.2.1). Because of linitatious due t,o the Geoprobe capabilities, the extent of sub-slabcon.tamination has yet to be determined.

Verecopr_mendtxpanitterimR!enedialMeasure(IBM)Ofcouectingthesunpcor[teITtsforciff:sitedi_sposal be conducted. As discussed in the Conclusion Of Section 1.2.3, we recommend {horJrighlycha;racte_rizing interior Foundry sands and dusts by grid sanpling. Once these recormended tasksar_e.perfarmed, we recormend that the Foundry beilding be denolished. Af tar demdition, a sub-slqb.twestigationwithatruelunounteddrtllrigisproposedinthefootpriritatthesoutheastcornerOfthebvilding.todeterminesourcearea(s)requlringremediationpriortore-developmentOftheproperty.

=E

1.0 Introduction1.1 Purpose of Report

The pulpose of this report is to present the results of the New York State Depart¥entof Environlnental Conservation QIYSDEC) Brownfields Site Investigation (SI) of theGeneva Foundry in. the City of Geneva, New York, pursuant to the Contract (ChangeOrder), sighed by the City of Geneva on Novemtter 30,1998.

1.2 SiteBackground

1.2.1 Sire Description

The Geneva Foundry site is located at 43 Jackson Street in the City of Geneva,New York Gigure 1, Regional Map). The Geneva Foundry is an approximately80,OOO-square-foot masonry building built as a foundry in the 1940s. The 2.5-

` acre parcel is located in an urban residential/commercial area near downtownGeneva. The site is bounded by Jackson Street at the north side of the property;the Lehi8h Station Railroad at the west side of the property; commercialproperty and Lewis Street at the south side of the Site; and an automotivemaintenance garage and residential properties, followed by Exchange Street tothe east of the site. .

1.22 Site ENoryG_en_ev_gi_Historicsocietv

The Geneva Foundry Corporation historic pamphlet marks the Catchpole BoilerWorks Company's beginvings on the present site in 1868 on Exchange Street(Appendix 15). By 1897 a Foundry hed been added and the business wasidentifeed as Catchpole & Cormpany. . The site gradually enlarged and beca;me .the Geneva.Foundry corporcttionwhen purchased in l92I by withan J. .Brennan, Sr., and was used contirmously as afioundry until 1988.

The historic pcrmphiet indicates that the Geneva Foundry "supplied easternindustry with qudity gray iron castings". Molding sctnd was processed byscreening, magnetic separation, nulling, and aeration as well as aiddition Ofbonding clays and "other mctterials''. A core room was equipped with "l]low-type machines as well as roll-over cnd. cther mechanical core mckingeqvipmeut. Two large batch=type ovens and one smaller drawer type gas oven"took care Of baking requlremeuts ... allays ouch ds silicon, chroninm, nickel,molybden:lan, ctc., are added at the receiving ladle and.checked by the chill testbefore dehiery to the maldingfloor.'. The cleaatng room had "all standardtypes Of clearing machines so that any cleaning spectficedons" could be met.There were "f;our large twmbling ba;ttels" and "high-speed grinders" as well ashand operated portdrle grinders cnd: chippers. Castings were moved franstation to stedon by f;ork tracks and: ultimately c[inyed at the shippingdepa[rimen± directly a!dyaceut to the cleaning room.

-2-

!D

tr

n

n

ln

lD

tr

n

H

The Geneva Foundry Corporc[tion booklet indicates that the Foundry buildingwas destrayed by fire in the early 1940s c[nd replaced with the present masoitryand steel structure, covering crver 80,000 square feet. This enlargedfiacilityexpanded ihio areas once occapied by the Ontario Coal Company and theBeard Coal Company to the west Of the former corxplex. The cnd:ustrialdevelopmat Of the site was irfluenced by the const:ruction Of the Syraouse &Rochester Railroad in 1841, which borders the site to the west. This railroadbeca;me part Of the New York Central System.

Stanborn Fire lnsura[nee Man_s

CopiesOfSanbornFirelneura:neeMapswithcoverageOfthesuftyectpropertydated 1884,1890,1897,1903,1909.1915,1925, .and: 1925 updc[ted to 1968were provided by the Geneva Historic Society (Appendix 16) .

The 1897 Sanborn Mctp indicates the A.Catchpole and Compa:ny "MachineShop and Foundry" located on the eastern portion Of the stlbJect site. Coalsheds and grain elevators were lclcated on the western side Of the site. cnd a"cement shed" is noted on the suftyect parcel on the north side Of Jackson

Street. Ne:w York Central Railroad bordered the site to the west.

In 1915, Catchpole Boiler, Foundry, and Machine Company occxpied the eastside Of the site. Ontario Coal Ccimpa;ny had coal sheds and a gra;in elevc[tor onthe west side Of the site, c[nd John H. Beard coal sheds occ:u:pied the pared onthe north side Of Jackson Strect.

The suftyect Geneva Foundry building was present in I 968, labeled "GenevaFoundry Corpora;tion. Plant No. 2, Division Of Ecko Products Corpora;tion". Agas tand¢was located at the northwest corner Of the ciffice` As discussed inSechon 2.2.2 Of this report, no tank was. discovered at this locc[tion duringOctober 1998 explclratory test pitting perfon'!!ied as part Of this SiteIINestigedon. The ctrea inside the lc[nge door at the southeast ccirner Of thebuilding is labeled " Crane Bay" , and the east side Of the building was a"CleawhgRoom".

Historic Aerial P_hot_o_s_

Aerial photographs fran the period 1968 through 1995 were re;vie:wed at theOritario County Department Of Plarming. The Geneva Foundry building on thesouthsideOfJacksonStreet,and,shedonthenorthsideOfJacksonStrectwerepresent through,out the period. No evidahee Of a gas tank (as noted on SanbornMap) is noted at the scale Of the photo taken in 1968. The rc[troed tracks to thewest, and surrounding area were sindlar in appec[rance throughout the periodOf these photos as they appear today.

-3-

:I.I

b

I1B

tr

tl

n

tr

D

Itr

I•H

n

I.I

.I

I

1.2.3 Previous Iiowestigatlons• 198_S__S_a_14

In June 1986, the owner of the adjacent property at 234 Exchange Street Q4s.Kay Gingeri) reported drums and spilled fluids on the Foundry property; it isunctear if any follow-up investigation was performed. Drums weresubsequently removed and spilled materials were collected.

_1986_Mctalscanp|_e_s_

4 Febxpary 1987 NYSDEC Memorandum premo) was sent by Ms. Mary JanePeachey to NYSDOH District Director Michael G. I,inse regarding " ElevatedMetal Concertratious.in Soils near Geneva Foundry" (Append]¢ 10). TheMemo indicated that Cormell Ur[iversity analyzed soil sc[mples collected in June198_6 from the garden cnd,f;once line Of the 234 Exchange Strect property. DECi,ndicated that Co:rnell "f iound levds Of iron, cadndun, copper. leek, hickal, zinccnd phosphorous above typical soil values" . Analytical data attached to thememo are as fiollows :

Paraii.eter Fence Garden Mil.eral soil,typical

TotalNitrogen 0.15

Orgctvic N - -Ammonia N

Phosphorus 0-15 0.16 0.08 'Potassham 0.24 0.44 I.9Calchan 2.93 1.73 a.9Magnesium 0.73 0.45 a.7Sodium 0.04 0.04 0.05Ircln 3.24 3.37 2.iAluminum 1.18 1.70 3.9Mangc[nese 0.10 0.08Cadminm 4.3 7.3 a.2cluroivium 77 jj J6Copper 205 8J 43Lead • 1340 1020 2jNickel 37.4 36.4 22Zz`JZC 1290 860 88

N.ate:AlthoughtheCcimellchalysespreseniedbyNYSDECdonotindicateuntts,theconcenirationsindicatethatdataispresentedinmg/Kgfoartsperrndllion).

-4-

Ib

n

n

b

Iir'

II?'

I'D

.'D

0

IIIiI

Gclnden AnalvsisThe Febrac[ry 1987 DEC Memo indicates that Cornell analyzed green beausgrown in the 234 Exchange Street garden:

Ctr NZ)Cr I.63 mgifegjvI. 2.06 mgmgPb 5 .80 mgmgZ71 31.0 mgn¢flC„ 7 .9 mgmg

The February 1987 DEC Mono was directed to tfee NYSDOH Geneva DistrictOffice. DEC requested an wiexprctc[tion Of the albove data relative to the"imminent or long-term tJureat.I , and asked fbr recommendations for re]nedial

measures (Appendix I,0).

NY__S_D_O_H_June__1_987hiter:Office_Mono_rqifrd_u_in.Dr.JohaHa;wleyseutaNYS-DOHwier-cifficememotoM}chael|inseonJune22, 1987 (Appofndx 11). Dr. Hcowley re;;ewed the Gringeri soft data c[nd statedthat "lead levels in the two soil sc[mples .... a:re higivly elevated when compa}.edto natural levels and also above levels typically f;ound in urban areas but notinmediately adyaceut to busy higivways. " Dr. Hawley suggested the i;ollowingSteps:

• Ms. Grtngeri should be advised that the elevated contandna:at levels in soilcreate the possibility Of elevated exposure.

• Ms. Gringeri and other local gardeners should be advised to washthorottghly all produce frcim their gardens to remove soil particles that maycoutaln high levels Of lead or other inetals.

Dr. Hctwley recommended that NYSDOH work with DEC to obtain all data onthe f ;oundry that may poteutially be userf ul in f iurther i"estigating this problem.He `suggested providing a map "shcrving the locations Of the fioundry,residential areas, and other potentially sensitive recaptors stlch as schoolswithin a ]y4 mile radius Of the foundry.

NYSDOH1987Mct£!1sJI_rilei:mE¥etia!±ifo_n_Michael I;inse sent a letter da.ted October 6,1987 to Ms. Kay C;ringeri, ownera[nd ocoupcmt Of the 2 34 Exchange Street residence, regarding "Heavy MctalSoil Coutawinatton" (Appchdix 12). Mr. I,inse stated thai "the results Ofanalysis corifined that there is no sign:iifecarit health hchard associated with theconsttmption Of edible plants grown in your garden.'. Based on elevated levelsOfhec[rymctalsinsods,Mr.I.insestatedthat"thoronghwashingOfdrlfrui:tsand vegctables is recoirmended and inporta:ut" .

-5-

_1_99:5 DEC SAMPLING EVENT

On Septenber 20, 1995 , NYSDEC collected can aqueous sanple from the sumppit f;or laboratory analysis f or volat+le orga[hic compounds (VOC) , arid Foundrystands and soils f ram neigivboring prope;ndes were sanpled f tor metals analysts :

thDECfieldnotesindicatethatanaqueoussamplewascollectedfromthesumpapproxinately 10 feet west Of the eastern edge Of i.he building and submitted toR;eera Environmental lnc. (Recra) fior volatile organic analysis OVOA). DECdescribed the water sctmple as "notably discolored w/ oil & waste". The fieldnotes state that DEC "had planned on getting a sludge sample from below thewater level, but uiifertunataly it was not possible to retrieve the sludge, evenafter repeated atteixpts " (Appendix 13).

S_uxpD__AnalysisTrance qudrndties foarts per billion) Of acetone, carbon disulf tide, tolue;ne, andxylenes were the only volatile organic compounds detected in the aqueous sumpscanple (Appendix 14) .

Foundrv Sc[ndsDEC col.Iected f irve sanples f ron f bundry sands or dusts collected f ram insidethe building, c[nd sttbndtted the samples to Recra fior Total Mctals analysis.

Mstal_s _AnalrysisLead levels in theftwe scanples were cur.lyzed to be 13.7 mgmg.14.I mg/kg, 60.7mgn¢g, 66.5 mg/kg, and 635 mgncg. The 635 mgifeg lead analysis was from thedust sample collected direaly beneath the centrally located " air pollutioncyclone''. These firve sarmples were designated GENE02. 03, 04, 05. and 06; al,lOf the analytical data are inalnded in Appendix I 4.

North Si.de JacksQn StreetDEF cotlected two soil sanples from the Foundry pared on the north side ofJackson Street for Mctals analysis (GENE07, 08) ; lead levels Of 211 rngn¢g and252 mgifeg were detected (Appendix 14) . .

B_ackarorindD_ECc?llectfdw¢attheyinterprctedasabackgroundsanplefron"justwestofthe railroad tracks" (GENEO9) ; 202 mgifeg were detected in the sample.

I:_CIN_CLHsloNS AN_D _|Mpl_|CAlrloNS. .The relatively clean sump water sanple collected by DEC in 1995 is `nctrapreseutative Of the VOCs cnd SVOCs dctected in the sludge sanple collectedduring this Site lrrvestigaton. The lead levels detected in sctmples CENE07, 08(A_pp_frdrl4)arerepresatativeofelevc[tedleadlevelsconfirmedduringthisSI. The sample labeled "background" by DEC in 1995 appears to have beencalleftedfromtoochosetotheFowidrytoactwallyrapresentbackgroundconditions.

-6-

(I

(I

[D

[1

(i

IE

H

n

H

ti

!1

!E

:I

:I

IIiI

Based on the elevated lead levels detected in the d:ust directly beneath thecerttrally located " c[ir pollution eyclone" , we recommend metals

• characterization Of the Foundry sands and drsts; a grid should be established toprovide complete coverage Of the Foundry f ootprinl. The results Of the metalscharacterization wilt be used to determine what quantity Of the sands would berecormended I;or collecfron and offisite disposal |]rior to denotttion Of theFoundry.

2.0 Study Area Investigation2.1 Surface Features

The Geneva Foundry building occupies the majority of the site on the south side ofJackson Street; a detached fomer office building is located east of the Foundrybuilding, and the eastern portion of the site is asphalt paved and fomer concrete slab.A dilapidated burned structure is present on the parcel on the nordi side of JacksonStreet, with asphalt and gravel to the east of the structure. A drainage ditch is presentbetween the Foundry site and the railroad to the west, with drainage flowing towardsSeneca Lake to the south.

2.2 Contaminant source Investigation

2.2.1 Passive soil Gas

A passive soil gas study was conducted during the preliminary phase offieldwork to identify potential source areas to investigate during the subsequentdrilling pbase of the site investigafron (Section 4.1). A potential source area isidentified in the sump inside the southeast comer of the Foundry buildingceigure 3).

2.2.2 Test Pits (Tank Exploration)

Two areas where pipes were noted aboveground were explored by test pitting todetermine if: the pipes were indicatiwi of buried .tanks:One pipe was investigated adjacent to the concrete stairs at the northwest comerof the former Foundry office building on October 15, 1998 (see Photo,Appendix 1). The pipe was followed beneath the porch and was identifiedexiting the far side of the porch; the former use of this pipe is unknown. ±!gtank was located.

A second pipe was investigated at the northwest comer of the Foundry building.Excavated soils were a clean-appealng gravel fill soil; EQ tank was located.

2.2.3 Sump sample

Anapparentsumpwithaccunulatedblacksludgeisloc'atedinsidetheFoundrybuilding, north of the door at the southeast comer of the building Q7igure 3). Asludge sample (with duplicate analysis) was collected for laboratory analysis(Appendix 2). Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in the sump areacetone (150 ppb); benzene (16 ppb); methyl ethyl ketone QffiK, 28ppb);carbon disulfide (99 ppb); methylene chloride (11 ppb); toluene (23 ppb); andxylenes (32 ppb). Semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) detected are bis(2-Ethythexyl) phthalate (4100 ppb) and naphthalene (2400 ppb). Metals detected

-7-

I

in the sump do EQ± appear to be of concern. ±!g polychlorinated biphenyls¢CBs) were detected in the sump.

2.2.4 Filled Foundry pit

The outline of a filled pit is evident in the northwestern quadrant of the Foundrybuilding Q=igure 3). A composite sample was collected from the apparentFounqry sand that fills the pit for laboratory analysis (Appendix 3). VOCsdetected in the pit fill sands are acetone (200 ppb); benzene (7.7 ppb); REK (33ppb);. methylene chloride (22 ppb); toluene (9 ppb); and Xylene§ (12 ppb).SVOCs detected in the pit fill are bis(2-Ethylhexyl)pthalate (1600 ppb); 2-

• Methylnaphthalene (1600 ppb); Naphthalene (2300 ppb); and phenanthrene

(1400 ppb).

2.3 Meteorological Information

Information relative to prevailing wind directions in the Geneva area was provided byRobert Seem of the Comell Uulversity New York State Agricultural ExperimentStation. Data for the year 1978 (arbitrarily selected from the period that the Foundrywas operating) indicate that on a month by month basis, the prevailing wind directionin Geneva was from the west-northwest quadrant. +4Jf%o2£gfe cz j„o%£fa Ztj; "o7z!feseasonal variedon is noted, the prevailing wind direction for the year originated in the270-degree to 314-degree west-northwest corxpass azimuth. This prevdrling windd|reaton would irifluence c[irborne d"st (with metal-bearing characteristics) ndgredonfran the Foundry. The 234 Exchange Street i>raperty, where elevated `ganden metalsare detected, is adtiacen± to and in the prevdrling dowrowind direction from theFciundry`

2.4 Surface-Water and sediment Investigations

Six sedinehi sc[mples were to be collected frojn the drtinage dick between the.Foundry and the rqdroad tracks to the west (Work.Plan, March 1998). However,when Peter h¢ortch (Passero Associates) and; Itm 'Cra[ft QTYSDEC) mat on site or.Oat?ber21,.1998tostakeoutsamplelo`cations,thedrchagedichwasdry,andnoevi.Pence Of F_oundry_ dr.atrage or runof f was noted. The side Of the Foundry buddinga9a?euttothe_trackshasnoapparenldischargepointsthatwouldbeantictpatedt-6d}scparge to the ditch. It the absence Of ctny apparent drainage pathways Jr

apschargep?tutsfromtheFoundry,itwasapparentthatdrainageditchsampleswouldb_errorei_ndca_rfuieofratlroadfrllmaterial,andn!ig±indieativeofpastrelea:esfrontheGeneva Foundry. It was agreed that sedimerit sampling from the ditch was riot

' warranted.

2.5 Geological Investigations

As previously napped, the overburden geology at the site consists of lacustrinedeposits,whichweredepositedinproglaciallakesandextendtoadepthofgreaterthan 15 feet below ground level. The deposits include laminated clays and silts, withthickness of up to 50 meters (Surficial Geologic Map of New York, Finger I,akesSheet 1980.

-8-

To obtain site-specific geological infomation and analytical data, a drilling programwas conducted in February 1999. Nineteen soil borings were drilled and sampled todepthsofuptofifteenfeet@igure3,MonitoringWellreoreholeLocationMap).

Sixsoilboringsweredrilledandsampledwithatruck-moimteddrillrigontheCtenevaFoundryparcelonthenorth§ideofJacksonStreet,andthreeboringsweredrilledwiththe truck-mounted rig around the exterior of the Foundry building. Hollow-stemangeringwithcontinuous2-inchdianeteraplit-apoonsoilsanplingwasconductedbyAmerican Auger & Ditching Co., hc. under the supervision of peter S. Morton, C.P.G.h addition, ten borings were drilled inside of the Foundry building with a skid-mounted Geoprobe (Section 3.2.1).

2.6 Soil and vadose zone Investigations

In October 1998, a passive soil gas investigation was conducted to screen the site forvadosezoneorganicvapors,andideutifyspecificareasforfurtherinvestigation.TwentyEmfluxsorbentcartridgeswereplacedintheground,includingsixsub-slablocationsinsideoftheFoundrybuildingandcollectedthreedayslater¢igure2);several of the cartridges were EQ± recovered. The samples were shipped to MarylandSpectral Services, inc. on 10/28/98 for analysis on 10/29/99.

inthesubsequentdrillingphaseoftheSI,nineteensoilsampleswerecollectedfromthe soil borings drilled in and around the Foundry building ¢igue 4). The soilsanplews were submitted to Columbia Analytical Services (GAS) for analysis inconformance with NYSDEC Analytical Services Protocol (ASP) methodology withCategory8deliverablepackageanalysesforTargetCompoundList(TCL)volatileorganic compounds (VOC) and TCL semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC), andTarget Analyte List (TAL) inorganics.

2.7 Groundwater Investigations

During the week of February 19-25,1999, six groundwater-monitoring wells wereinstalledontheFoindrysite.Thewellsweredevelopedbyhand-bailingandlow-flowpumping in April 1999, and groundwa.tor samples were collected on April 28, 1999and June 29, 1999. hi the first round of samples collected in April, analysis for TargetCompound List (TCL) volatile organic compounds ovoc) and TCL §emivolatileorganic compounds (SVOC), and Target Analyte List (TAL) inorganics wereperfome¢inconformancewithNYSDECAnalyticalServicesProtocol(ASP)methodology with Category a deliverable package.

BasedontheAprilsanpleresults,withDECapproval,thesecondroundofgroundwaferanalyseswereperfomedbynon-ASPmethodologiesforvolatileanalysisand inorganic analysis only.

-9-

2.8 Human populations surveys

Ir[formc[Ppn_:rpplie¢by!h_e_Cityo{GenevaindicatesthatthecityhasapopulationIf

?!mo_stl5.:0?0.pe?plf.A.Pimanpopulationss::I:i;eyis_generallyconduct:daspart-Ofthe Dctalled Amakysis Of Allema[twes portion Of the Risk Assessmehi. Passero

4?_s_a_c±ates_,LarsenEngineers,NYSDEC,andNYSDOHhadameethgonJune21,1999, tp discus.s i_he results Of chef irst round Of soil and groundwate; sampling. It wasagreedup?natthatmeetingthat,bcisedontheprevalenceOfsampleswhhnocoup.oun.dsdetectedinctryOfthec[pealrses("rtondetects"),thaiheeffortctnd,expenserequired to prepare a quntitative Risk Assessment was nat warranted. Based dri theclove,aHunanPopulchonSurveywasnotcorxpletedaspartOfthisSI/RAprofect.

2.9 Ecological Investigations

The _€eneva Foundry is bordered by residential property ±o the east, with coryrmercialbui_ldin_g5 to the east, southeast. cnd: south. The Lehigh Station Railroad is at the wests_ide Of_the_ site, and Jackson Street and residential p;operty are to the north. TheF.oundrybeildingcoverstheinlforityOfthesiteonthesouthsideOfJacksonStreet.,th_e.eas}e_rm_portionOftheparceliscoveredbyasphalt.Thesttbje;tparcelonthe;orthsideofJ_acfeo_nstreethasthedrlapidated,burnedshellofaf;owner:coalshedonthewest side Of the.site. The portion Of this parcel that is not drsphth or gravel-covered iso±ergrown with grasses cnd weeds. There are n!ig. sttrf ece wc[lers or ;etlands or. site.Tpe poten.tial.f or ecological traraport of f site is primarily through groundwater. AsdpFus.s?I.re!.ativ*etoaHuyia.npo_pulati_o?Surrvey,becaineoftireirevalenceof"nandetects"ipthefirstr?upedofanarfucaldata,anEcological:Ir[veingationwas-notcompletedioquanttfytheRIskAssessmenlportionOftheprofect.

2.10 Interim Remedial Measure -Drum Removal

PriortothisSI,theinterioroftheFoundrybuildingwaslitteredwithduns,pails,andassorted containers, contents ulinown. Envirormental Products & Services (EPS)have completed the iuterin remedial removal. of the miscellaneous containers. EPSconsolidated the dqus and miscellaneous c`ontainers to a staging area inside the doorat the southeast comer of the Foundry building. Z7Ze co7!fen¢g we7ie ffeen chcz7`Hcte7'z.zedas .an assortmgr± Of oils; greases; disinif ;ecta;nhs: soivenfs; cenents; rust iwhlbitor; andotp%rassort^edTatFials.(Appepdi3.4):PPAassignedlD#NYD002216794toth;ecityOfG~enevaSortFfF_a_u_pdry_,c[ndallofthecoritainerscontatningprohatwerereno;edonnsepfenberl5,1???:Co.pie_s__OfB{ll.sofLed_ing,Packingl;irirs,andwasteproftleRep?rfswerepro_vi.did_to}he_arty?ndareinclndedinApfendix4.Theonlydr;msorcoutc[iners renatving in the Foundry are enpty coutatriers that win be hc[;died ascf rtrl:cti,on/.d.a.mditiop (CP) .debris. Becpus?_all Of the ccmlctners were indde Of theF_oundrybeilding,cndnoobvioussignsofsptll.agewiere.notedwhenEPScouol;datedtheygstes,nofiollow-apsanpling.wasw-arairtedwhenthecoutatnerswerecoItect;dcnddisposedOfoffsite.

-10-

IIII

3.0 Physical characteristics of the study Area3.1 Geology

Soils. beneath the Foundry site have been previously napped as proglacial lacusthnesilts and clays (Surficial Geologic Map of New York, Finger Lakes Sheet, 1986).Soils encountered during this investigation are comprised prinarily of fine-grainedSands with varying amounts of silt and clay, consistent with the lacustrine depositspreviously described; several feet of coarse gravelly fill soils were encountered abovenative soils. .The Geoprobe borings inside of the Foundry were terminated at anapproximate depth of nine feet because of difficulties encountered in withdrawing thedrilling rods from the tight soil; soils encountered in the Geoprobe borings wereprimarily Foundry sands and fill soils (Soil Boring Logs, Appendix 5).

3.2 Hydrogeology

3.2.1 Monitoring wells

During the February 1999 drilling program, six monitoring wells were installed;MW-l is located on the parcel on the norfu side of Jackson Street, and MW-3and MW-4 ae one-inch diameter `inicro-wells" installed inside of the Foundrybuilding Figure 4). Because of the similarity of the fine sandy soils withvarying amounts of silt encountered across the site, all of the outside weus wereinstalled with sinilar completion specifications (Appendix 6). Drilling wasperformed by hollow-stem augering to depths of fifteen feet; a 2-inch-diameterPVC monitoring well, screened from fifteen feet to five feet, was installed at allwell locations. The micro-wells inside of the Foundry were teminated atapproxinately nine feet.

3.2.2 Groundwater contours

Depth to groundwater was measured prior to sampling in all of the Foundrywells on June 29,1999. Well elevations were Surveyed by the City of G.eneva,and the data was used to prepare a groindwater contour map (Appendix 8). Asindicated on`the contour map, the groundwater flow direction beneath theFoundry Site is to the southwest.

3.2.3 Hydraulic conductivity

RETHODOIjoGYHydraulic conductivity testing of the uppermost water bearing zone wasperfomed during the second round of groundwater sampling on June 29, 1999.Prior to performing the actual slug tests, an appropriate method for calculating .hydraulic conductivity Q[) values had to .be selected. `Based upon severalknowncharacteristicsofthe.screenedwaterbearingzope(unconfued,partiallypenetrating wens, water levels in the screens) and the plamed method of slugtesting,theBouwerRicemethodofcalculatinghydraulicconductivityvalueswas chosen.

=qu-

/

Prior to performing the slug tests, the depths to water level and the bottom ofeach well were measured from the top of the PVC well `casing. All wells testedwere of similar construction and depth. Slug tests were performed using therising head test. Since the water levels were in the screens of the weus beingtested, the rising head method was most appropriate. This method is performedby quicklyremoving a volume of water or solid slug from the well and measuring overtime the rise/recovery of the lowered water level.

FIELD PROCEDUREAsstated,the§hetestmethodutilizedwasarisingheadtest,requiringavolume of water or a solid slug be quickly removed from the well casing, andthe subsequent rise of the lowered water level me.asured and recorded over time.During slug testing at the Geneva sites, a bailer was lowered into each testedwell and the water level was allowed to return to static. Once the water level inthe well returned to static, the bailer full of water (approximately 1 liter) wasquickly removed and the subsequent water levels were measured as the waterlevel recovered over time. Water levels were measured using a Solinst waterlevel indicator equipped with an audible alarm. Depths to water were measuredat tined intervals iud recorded in the field book. In most cases, the water levelsin the tested wells were measured until approximately 90% of the original staticwater level had returned. Field measurements collected during the slug testingare included as Appendix 9.

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITYThe Bouwer/Rice method was used to calculate the hydraulic conductivities Q£

¥oa:u#f%r£¥::]6SxM]¥;5c£:e¥i6#::s°4T8dxryLSo±.t3e;m¥/::c:alculatedKvalues

GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITYTheflowvelocitycalculatedwithinth6waterbearingzoneattheFoundrysitewas calculated from an approximate average horizontal gradient of the water

::¥%;;ufadcethaec::sesr:::fit:£Lj:%±:=tehseti#aotewoe:Lg:e:tce¥at]3:2¥;g.gnc#:::;7Groundwater flow velocity at the Foundry site is calculated to be 185 fvyr.

-12-

3.3 RESIDENTIAL SOIL SAMPLING, GENEVA FOUNDRY

3.3.1 October 1998 Sample Event

As discussed in Section 1.2.3, NYSDEC and NYSDOH identified concernsrelevated to elevated metal levels ip residential gardens around the GenevaFoundry. Gardens in the immediate vicinity were sampled as part of this SI

* Odefoer 1998 (Figure 4): The analytical results are conpared to easternU.S. background vahaes and Recommended Soil Cleanap Obj ectives in Table1. Th_e easterp U.S. background val;ues and Clec["p Objectives I;or themetals are taken from NYSDEC Techvied and Administratwe dvidance

gf en?rFn4_un (TAGM) 4046 entitled "Determination Of Soft CleanxpLevels" (dated Jcrrmary 24, 1994). Althottgh the TAGM is intended-asgifdeneef;ortheremedic[tionofhazardouswastesites,thebackgroundandalea;yupvaluespreseutedintheTA:GMci,reusedhereasareferamcetoevahate the relcutye magri:itude Of coutaminaut levels in the soil,ssurrounding the Foundry.

A cc)mparison Of the sanple results to eastern U.S. backgroundconfentrations as shown in Table I indicates that concentrations Of arsenic,c_a_d_wi_un:copper,lead,mercury,andzincexceedtheupperrangeOfeasten

Y._S_. Pp.cf aground concentrations. These results cor[f rm the results of the1_986NYSDECsanplescollectedfromtheGingeripropertyat234ExchangeStreet.

Table 1

COMPARISON OF SAMPLE RESULTS TO EASTERN U.S. BACKGROUNDCONCENTRATIONS, NYSDEC RECOMMENDEI) CLEANUP OBJECTIVES, AND SITE

BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS

(Concentrations are in units of mg/Kg)

Analyte Eastern USBkgrd CleanupObjective Sample Results

40J 34J 34J (dup) 234E 178E

Aluminum 33.000 SB 8,170 9.410 10,500 9,320 10,400Antimony NA SB 3.4J 2.5J '

-..., i..8J. ''T:. 4.:0-I :i: ::. . ' .I'.4J-'=.-

Arsenic 3 -12* 7.5 or SB 23.2J 21.5J' 16.9J 22.3J 23.3J

Barium 15 i 600 300 or SB - - - - -Beryllium 0 -I.75 0.16 or SB 0.70 0.77 0.77 0.69 0.75Cfadmium 0.I -I 1 orsB 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3Calcium 13 0 -35,000* SB 8.410 11200 5.370 13.400 16,200

Chromium I .5 -40* 10 or SB 24.2J 26.7J 25.7J 30.1J 39.2JCobalt 2.5 - 60* 30 or SB 11.7 10.2 10.1 8.8 9.4Copper 1-50 25 or SB 154J 101J 104J 2,340J 972J

Iron 2,000-550,000 2.000 or SB 27.200 26'400 21,900 23,600 19,500Lead` ** SB 471 588 668 I,080 747

Mamesium loo-5.000 SB 2.870 8.000 3,230 3.640 5,800Manganese 50 - 5.000 SB 578 740 709 832 467

Mercury 0.001 -0.2 0.I l.3J 0.25J 0.25J 0.33J 0.72JNIckel 0.5 - 25 13 or SB 19.I 22.7 21.8 21.1 19.2

Potassium 8'500-43`000* SB I,270 2,040 2,180 I,520 1,160Selenium 0.I -3.9 2 or SB I.2 1.3 1.2 0.97 1.3

Silver NA SB 4.1 I.2 1.2 2.0 2.3Sodium 6,000 - 8,000 SB ND ND ND NI 824

Thallium NA SB 6.3 8.9 6.5 6.7 8.7Vanadium 9-50 150 or SB 21.6 27.0 23.9 20.3 2:2..J

Zinc 9-50 20 or SB 723 628 663 786 668Cyanide NA NA 0:17 032 ND ND ND

Notes:Eastern U.S. background values and cleanup objebtives are from NYSDEC TAGM 4046NA = not available*New York State background** 4 - 16 ppm in "ral areas; 200 -500 |]pm in metropolitan areasSB = Site background concentrationND = non-detect result

3.3.2 May ig99

Elevated levels of the metals mentioned above precipitated a second, moreextensive round of garden sampling. Locatioris ofbo.th rounds of residentialsamples characterized for surficial metal levels are presented on Figure 2. OnMay 5, 1999, David Napier ofNYSDOH coordinated sampling at greaterdistances from the Foundry to investigate the aerial extent of elevated levels ofmetals in soil. As indicated below, the majority of the samples were collectedfrom the top 2 inches of soil, and none of the samples were collected from adepth greater than 6 inches.

Twenty-one soil samples were collected around the area of the Foundry andwithin the city of Geneva. Each soil sample was collected using a clean

-14-

disposable plastic trowel and placed in a 4-ounce sample jar. The jars wereproperlylabeledandputinacooleronicetopreservesampleintegchtyfortransportation to the testing laboratory. All soil samples were analyzed for TALmetals, of which there was particular interest in the lead concentrations.

A list of the May 1999 sample locations ®1otted on Figure 2) and soil depthsfrom which samples were collected is presented below. The following Table 2presents the May 1999 analytical results with Eastern US Background levels andCleanup Obj ectives for comparison purposes.

1) Genesee park 0-2''

2) Ballpark 0-2„

3) Near St. FrancesRCChurch 0-2„

4) 34 Jackson st. front 0-2„

5) 34 Jackson st. back 0-2„

6) 34 Jackson st. back 6''

7) 178 Exchange st. garden out back 6„

8) 178 Exchange st. backyard right comer of yard, out backl0` from 0-6„fence, 3' from block garage (composite)

9) 234 Exchange st. backyard 33.5' east from Foundry wall and 32.70-2„feet south from other Foundry wall

10) 234 Exchange St. backyard 33.5' east from Foundry wall and 32.76„feet south from other Foundry wall

11) (QC) off SW porch comer post; 14' west and 17' north of statue 0-2„

12) (QC) off SW porch comer post; 14' west and 17' north of statue 61'

13) Behind or east of26 Lewis St. 32.5'; from Horsechestn.ut tree and 23.5'0-2„from the NO PARKING sign

15)AreawestoftheFoundry21'ofNPearTreeandappr6x.72'WofRR0-2„Tracks on Parcel 228 on the Tax Map

14) Behind or east of26 Lewis St. 32.5' from Horsechesthut tree and 23.5'4„6„from the NO PARKING sign.

16) drea west of the Foundry 21' ofN Pear Tree and approx. 72' W ofRRTracks on parcel 228 on the Tax Map

17) 195 Exchange Street backyard central north area of garden0.2„

18)90 Center st. 30' fromJackson st. and 30 ' from centerst. .

19) 21 State St. 27' from hedges along Center St. and 25' from the garage0-2„behind 21 State St.

20) 21 State St. 27' from hedges along Center St. and 25' from the garage

21) 3' from the back fence comer between 67 and 71 State St, 0-2„

The concentrations of lead found in the soils sampled ranged from 64 mg/Ing at the Ballpalc to 1210mg/kg found at two locations (234 Exchange Street at a depth of 6" and at 178 Exchange Street at adepth of 6"). Analytical results are tabulated as follows:

-15-

C_ONCI,H_S_IONThe elevc[ted levels Of surfictal metals in residendal praperties around the Foundry should beaddressed. The wind rose data discussed in Section 2.3 indicate a prevailing wind direction fromthe west-northwest quadrant. However, to a lesser degree, winds occur that originate from allcoiapass points. Elevated levels Of metals in surficial soils were detected is all Of the resideatialsamples collected f or analysis. Additional data should be collected in cortjunction with NYSDOH todeterndne mctal levels at depths greater than 6 inche.s. Based on the results Of the data indicatingvc[riation with depth, an abatement progran will be prepared to eddress NYSDOH concerns.

4.0 Nature and Extent of contaminationAnalytical results from the passive soil gas investigation, borehole soils, and two rounds ofgroundwater sanples and two rounds of residential garden sainples are presented below:

4.1 Passive soft Gas

The Emflux data are categorized as Total Aliphatic Hydrocirbous, TotalB enzene/Toluene/Ethylbenzene/Xylenes @TEX), and Total chlorinated solvents. Asindicated on the map in Figure 3, a potential source area of all three categories isidentified at Point 13 near the sump in the southeast comer of the building.

4.2 Borehole soils

During the week of February 19-25,1999, nineteen soil borings were drilled andsampled at the Geneva Foundry site. As i7ed!cazed o7e Fz.gt¢re i, £%e soz./ borz.Jig:I we7ielocated to provide data in sub-slab locations inside the Found:ry, and also outsidelocaticms on the parcels on both the north and south sides Of Jackson Strect.Borehale-4 (converted to mohitoring well MW-3) was located adjacent to the sumpinside the east side Of the Foundry buliding. MW5 and MW-6 were located at thepresumed dcl:wngradient, south side Of the building.

One soil sample .from each location was shipped to Columbia Anal5rfical Services forVoa. SNOC;. and frorgwic; analyses. As indicated by the Data Uschility SummaryR:epat (DUSK) prepared by Dr. Kenneth Applin, "indicates that all data areusable".

DiscussionThe borehole soil date do nat indicate any areas wcuranting soil remediation cirdelineation. The residential surficial soil sa;aples discussed previously exhibit leadlevels ap to two orders Of magnitude greater than the lead levels detected in the sckborings. Trace levels Of acetone detected in th? majority Of the soils ci:re prckchly alabc)ratciry artifact, and riot indicative Of soil conditions on site.

• The analytical results are tabulated in`thef allowing pages.i.

-18-

Borehole Soil I)ata

BH| Compound Name Co ncentratio n quGAIG)VOCs Acetone 4JSVOCs ro

Analyte Concentration OrGAIG)Inorganic Aluminum • 12,200

Arsenic 3.0Bariun 103Calcium 44,500

Chromium 16.4copper 15.3

Iron 19'900Lead 9.9

Magnesium 19,500Manganese 460

Nickel 20.1Potassium 1,340Vanadium 25.0

Zinc 51.9Total Cyanide ro

ND Non DetectJ Estimated value (detected b elow labs Quantification Limit)

BH2 Compound Name Concentration COGAIG)VOCs Acetone 6JSVOCs Phenanthrene 110J

Fluoranthene 120JPyrene 120J

Bermo(a)Anthracene 80JChrysene 84J

Benzo®)fluoranthene 82JBerlzoQ¢)Fluoranthene 68J

Benzo(a )Pyrene 69JAnalyte Concentration OrGAIG)

Inorganic Aluninum 5160Calcium 36500


hen . 11200Lead 7.8

Magnesium 14300Manganese 371.

Nickel 9.7Vandiun 14.8

Zinc 26.4Total Cyanide ND

19-

BH3 Compound Name Concentration QJGAIG)

VOCs Acetone 5JSVOCs ND

Analyte Concentration (MG/KG)

Inorganic Aluinun 10800Arsenic 3-0Bariun 67.5Calcium 57000

Chromium 14.2Copper 12.9

hon 18600Lead 7.9

Magnesium 18100

Manganese 511

Nickel 18.6Potassium 13700Vanadium 24.4

Zinc 42.7Total Cyanide ro

PCBs ND

BH4 Compound Name Concentration (UG/KG)

VOCs Acetone 9J2-Butanone 2J

SVOCs NDAnalyte Concentration OrG/KG)

Inorganic Aluminum 14700Bariun 137Calcium 56400

Chromium 19.9

Copper 15.3

Iron 21300Lead 10.1

Magnesiun 16600Mariganese 477

Nickel 23.8Potassium 3110

Vanadium 28.2Zinc 55.8

Total Cyanide ro

20


VOCs Acetone 5JFluoranthene 80J

Pyrene 72JChrysene 47J

SVOCs Fluoranthene 80JPyrene 72J

Chrysene 47JAnalyte Concentration quGAIG)

Inorganic Aluninun 9050arsenic 10.4Barium 143Calcium 50300

Chromium 20.2Copper 75,2

Iron 26800Lead 246

Magnesium 10700Manganese 568

Nickel 25.7Potassium 1710Selenium 1.4Vanadium 21.0

Zinc 118

Total Cyanide NDPCBs ND

BH6 Compound Nan.e Concentration quG/KG)

VOCs Acetone 4J2-Butanone 5J

Tetrachloroethene 6JSVOCs Bi§(2-Ethylhexy)Phthalate 39J

Analyte Concentration quGurG)

Inorganic Aluminum 2210Chronriun 3.9Copper 8.5hen 5280Lead 3.9Magnesiun 1170Manganese 220ZincTotal Cyanide ND

BH7 Compound Name Concentration quGAIG)VOCs Acetone 7J

2-Butanone 3JSVOCs Bis(2-Ethythexyl)Phthalate 49J

An alyte ` Con centration OrG/KG)

Inorganic Alumjnun 64800AIsenic 5.2Bariun 75.4Calcium 19300

Chromium 11.1

copper 19.0hen 16100Lead 74,2

Magnesiun 5800Manganese 356

Nickel 13.1

Potassium 1290Vanadium 17.5

Zinc 129Total Cyanide ND

BH8 Compound Name Con centration {UGAIG)

VOCs Acetone 3JSVOCs Di-n-Burylphthalate 43J

Analyte Concentration quG/KG)

Inorganic Aluninun 10100AIsenic 7.0Bariun 63.6Calcium 6520

Chrondun 21.0Copper 26.2

Iron 27100Lead 21.3


Nickel 16.8Vanadium 26.0


BH9 Compound Name Concentration quGAIG)

•S

VOCs Acetone 4JSVOCs Di-n-Butylphthalate 61J

Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 64JAnalyte Concentration (MGAIG)

Inorganic AluminumArsenic 13100T5es.L5:.a rD.

Bariun 70.2.Calcium 10200


Iron 35600Lead 56.3


Nickel 17.3Vanadium 29.3


BH10 Compound Name Concentration quGAIG)

VOCs Acefone 5J

SVOCs ND

Analyte Concentration Q¢G/KG)

Inorganic Aluminum 8880Arsenic 4.9Bariun 53,3Calcium 3420


Iron 21000Lead 16.6


Nickel 13.8Vanadium . 21.9


BHll Compound Name Concentration (UG/KG)

VOCs Acetone 5J

SVOCs Di-n-Butylphthalate 40JBis(2-Ethythexy)Phthalate 70J

Analyte Concentration OrG/KG)

Inorganic Alundnum 8610Barium 61.9Calcium 82700


Iron 13800Lead 7.7


Nickel 13.4

Potassium 1400Vanadium 16.8



VOCs Acetone 4JToluene 32

SVOCs Fluoranthene 43JPyrene 43J

Chrysene 43JBis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 47J

Benzo@)fluoranthen.e 140JBenzo®Fluoranthene 130J

Indeno(1,2,3,-cd)Pyrene 62Jdralyte C on centration quG/KG)

Inorganic Aluninun 4290AIsenic 2.7.

e Calcium 11500

Chrmiun 6.8copper 12.5

Iron 10100Lead .6.3

Magneslun 3560Manganese 291Vanadium 12.8



VOCs Acetone 5J

SVOCs Di-n-Butylpbthalate 50JBis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 52J


Inorganic Aluninun 12000Arsenic 3.6Bariun 82.5Calcium 39200


Iron 18800Lead 55.4




BH14 Compound Name Concentration (UGnKG)

VOCs Acetone 6J

SVOCs Bis(2-Ethylhexy)Phthalate 44JAnalyte Concentr ation aVIG/KG)

Inorganic Aluminum 13900Arsenic 3.0Barium 89.8Calcium 57600


Iron 20700Lead 9.6


Nickel 21.0Potas§iun 2490Vanadium 27.0



VOCs Acetone 3JSVOCs ND


Inorganic Aluminum 6750Barirm 51.1

Calcium 43200Ouomiun 8.4

copper 10.8Iron 12600Lead 6.3


Nickel 13.2Potassium 1510

Vanadium 15.5

Zinc 37.1Total Cyanide ND.

BH16 Compound Name Concentration quG/KG)

VOCs Acetone 5J

SVOCs ND


Inorganic Aluminun 15700Arsenic 5.5Bariun 138Calcium 2:J90


Iron 26000Lead 17.2




26.


VOCs Acetone 4J

SVOCs ND

Analyte Concentration quGAIG)

Inorganic Aluminum 11200Arsenic 10.3

Bariun 187Calcium 9410

Chromium 14.5

copper 16.3Ion 20500Lead 252


Nickel 18.6Potassium 1460Selenium 1.3


Total Cyanide ro'

BH|8 Compound Name Concentration (UG/KG)

VOCs Acetone 14Carbon Di sulfide 7J

2-Butanone 5JSVOCs Bis(2-Ethythexyl)Phthalate 44J


Inorganic Aluinun 7070Arsenic 6.6Barium 75.6Calcium 33400

Chl.omiun 11.8

Copper 26.4hen 20400Lead 2:J .3





VOCs Acetone 4J

SVOCs ND


Inorganic Alundnum 14900Arsenic 3.2

Bariun 109Calcium 48100

Chromium 19.6

copper 21.3

Ion 23100Lead 10.1 '


Nickel 25.7

Potassium 1920


Total cyanide NI)

28-

4.3

April 1999

GroundwaterThe fist round of groundwater samples was collected on April 29,1999 andsubmitted to GAS for VOC, SVOC, and inorganic analyses. Because ofinsufficient water in the one-inch diameter MW4, located inside the Foundry,the MW4 sample was analyzed for VOC only.

The fist round of groundwater analytical results is tabulated below:

owl Compound Name Concentration quGtl)

VOCs roSVOCs Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate 2J

Analyte Concentration QJGEL)

Inorganic Aluninun 3570Calcium 148000

Iron 4690Magnesium 51800Manganese 197

Mercury 0.32Sodium 23400

MW2 Compound Name Concentration quGEL)

VOCs ND

SVOCs Bis(2-Ethylhexy)Phthalate 2JAnalyte Concentration QJGth)

Inorganic Calcium 120000Ion 325

Magnesiun 22300Manganese 2080Potassium 12300

Sodium 27200

Ow3 Compound Name Concentration quoth)

VOCs ND

SVOCs NDAnalyte Concentration quGflL)

Inorganic Ahaminun 342Calcium 129000

Iron 496Magnesiun 36000Potassium 10800

Sodium 63400

Ow4 Compound Name Concentration QJGth)

VOCs ND

Ow5 Compound Name Concentration quGth)

VOCs NDSVOCs ND

Analyte Concentration QJGth)

Calcium 89200Chromium 43.7

Lead 158Magnesium 15900

Sodium 58200

Ow6 Compound Name Concentration quGfr)

VOCs NDSVOCs ND

Analyte Concentration apGth)

Inorganic Aluninun 223Calcium 155000

Iron 492Magnesiun 30900Manganese 19.1

Potassium 10000Selenium 5.3

Sodium 51000

The second round of groundwater Samples was collected,and submitted to CAS on June 30, 1999.With NYSDEC approval, second round samples were analyzed for Vocis and Inorganics only.Because of the small volume of water that was present in the two one-inch diameter wens Orw3,MW4) installed inside the Foundry, these wells were sampled for VOC analysis only. The secondround data is tabulated below:

JUNE 30.1999

owl chalyte Concentration QJGth)

Volatile roAnalyte Concentration OrGEL)

Inorganics Aluminum 40.2Arsenic 0.0181

Barium 0.338

Calcium 272Chronriun 0.0636

copper 0.0554tron 64.9Lead 0.0501

-30-

Magnesium 101

Manganese I.32Niekel 0.0521

Potassium 13.2Sodium 39.6

Vanadium 0.0957Zinc 0.172` Non Detect.

Ow2 Analyte Concentration quGEL)

Volatile NDAnalyte Concentration OrGEL)

Inorganic Aluninun 12.0Barium 0.181Calcium 135

Chromium 0.0178Iron 17.9 .Lead 0.0102

. Magnesiun 35.4Manganese 0.571Potassium 4.44

Sodium 75.0Zinc 0.0483

MVV3 -VOC Non Detect

Mlh/4 - VOC Non Detect

Ow5 dralyte . ` Concentration quGEL)

Volaffle roAnalyte Concentration OrGEL)

Inorganic Aluninun 1.23Bariun 0.0697Calcium 114

iron' 2.13

Magnesiun 22.4Manganese 0.0623Potassium 2.17

Sodium 71.0Zinc 0.0200

Ow6 ' AnalyteConcentration quGEL)

Volaffle NDAnalyte Concentration OrGm)

Inorganic Alulnun 1.59 LBariun 0.0637

Calcium 101

Iron 2.19Magnesium 19.9Manganese 0.0913Pofassiun 9.15

Sodium 42.2ZJE£ 0.0214

4.4 Discussion

Lead was detected in MW-5 in April 1999 at a concentration of 158 ug/L, greater thanthe Groundwater Standard of 25 ug/L. Lead was g±Q! detected in the June 1999 samplecolleofed from MW-5 (detection limit 0.00500 mg/L, or. 5 ug/L). Althou8b gg Voeswere detected in MW-3 near the sump, the passive soil gas data indicate a possiblesource of chlorinated solvents beneath the slat, near the sump in the southeast comerof the Foundry Building. More extensive sampling should be performed in thisarea with a truck-mounted drill rig after deznolition.

5.0 Contaminant Fate and Transport5.1 Potential Routes of Migration:

Characterization of EXDosure S etting:

This Brown field site in Geneva, N.Y. has unique Industrial - Commercial setting asseen on the location maps. The City of Geneva has its primary access from the northside via Route 14, which cormects to NYS Thruway Rt.90 on the north side.Significant railroad lines exist to serve the area along route 14 and the shorelinealong West Side of Seneca Lake. The main traffic was in the easterly direction totransport material toward Seneca County along the north end of the lalce. This railroad line wrapped around the Geneva Foundry on south westerly side and connectsto the Industrial commercial area off Gates Ave. on north side.

Residential prop.erdes are present to the north and west of the Foundry, and bothcommercial and residential establishments are located to the south and east.

The site is part of the old City of Geneva, and is serviced by Cfty of Geneva pubticwater and sewers. The availability of the public water supply eliminates the need forground water supply wells and, therefore, no drinking water wells are known to existwithin one mile of the Foundry site.

Most of the land area of the site was developed mary yeaps ago, and is either pavedor contains stable vegetative ground cover. Cirass areas and matine trees serve asbariers to soil erosion, and also inhibit tranaport of surface soil particles into surfaceruri!off or air. This site has been reviewed lay the New York State Health DepartmertiI)ased on some local citizen concerns about f oundry 's impact on residential lawns,vegetable ganders e±c. As discussed in Section 1.2.3, NYSDEC and NYSDOHirrvestigated velds in residential gardens around the Foundry in 1986-87. Elevatedswrficidl levds Of lead and zinc in the residences around the Foundry were firstdemonstrated by NYSDEC/NYSDOH in 1986-87, and confi:rmed by the October 1998and May I 999 during this SI. We recorrmend characterizing netal concentrc[tioms at

-32-

greater depths in cortyunction with NYSDOH, prior to design:ing a remedial plan forthe elevated levels of metals in the surf ictal soils. `

5.1 Contaminant persistence

The site investigation has identified the on-site presence of petroleum compounds -Benzene-Toluene and Xylene under the Building structures, and metals in the adjacentoff:stife gAId?qu soflis. Samples taken at distances in the prevailing dowrrwind directionto the east-sdutheast ci:rea do show elevc[ted metal concentratioris compared to typicalbackground concentrcttions Of these metals. Generatry. Lead and Zinc conceniraticiusappear to be liwited to the top layer Of soil below the grass cover, cnd presehi alinited exposure or pathway for exposure. The mctals are generally Of lcirw soltlbility,and will have a high persistence time in the soil. Pctroloum compounds will naturallydegrade with avallabitity Of nutrients and a source Of oxygen.

5.2 Contaminant migration -Asse.ssment of Human exposure pathways

This section describes the types of human exposures that could result in added healthrisks to persons at or around the site.

An exposure pathway is how an individual may come into contact with a contaminant.

The exposure pathway has five basic elements as follows:

1) source of contamination;2) environmental media and transport mechanisms;3) point of exposure;4) route of exposure; and5) receptor population.

These elements of an exposure pathway may be based on past, present or future events.Completed pathways, which are known to or inay exist at the Foundry site, include:

ON-SITE PATHWAYS :A majority of the site is occupied by the structlires and potential heavy metalaccumulation may have occurred under the pits and sumps and confined within thebuilding.

Petroleum contamination or heavy metals contained in the Soil under the Foundrystructure represents potendal threat to residents in following manner;

• Ingestion of on-site soils in unpaved.areas; ' i• Direct cofitact with on-site soils in unpaved areas;• hhalation of dust from the site;• Potential direct contact with surface runoff migrated to neighborhood;• Potential inLalation of voc's from contaminated groundwater and soils.

The netals would generally not qffed± the storm water generated in the ctrea since theycare not in direct corttact with precipitation. Mctals normally concen:irate in the rootzone Of the oval,fable grass or vegctedon. and do not tend to wash coway wwh thestormwc(terrunoff

-33-

OFF-SITE PATHWAYS :Air discharges from Foundry operations have resulted in increased levels of lead andzinc .in surficial soils around the Foundry. h 1987, NYSDOH issued a waning thatvegetables grown in close proximity to the Foundry should be thoroughly washedbefore eating these vegetables (Section 1.2.3). There appears to be a higher risk ofexposure to the garden soil, as compared to groundwafer migration from the foundy.

Elevated levels of heavy metals in the soils on nearby properties represent potentialexposure to residents in the fonowing marmers:

• hgestion of garden soils;• Direct contact with garden soils while digging and planting seeds;• Inhalation of dust while gardening;• Potential direct contact with surface runoff from the Foundry.

These elements of an exposure pathway may be based on past, present or future events.Completed pathways, which are known to or may exist at the Foundry site, include:

• ingestion of on-site soils in unpaved areas;• Direct contact with on-site soils in unpaved areas;• inhalation of dust from the Site;• Potential direct contact with groundwater;• Potential inhalation of voc's from contaminated groundwater and soils.

A majority of the site is occupied by the Structures and potential heavy metalacoumulation may have occurred under the pits and sumps and confined within. thebuilding. Therefore, demolition of the old buildings would remove unsafe structuresand provide access to the construction equipment to remove concrete floors etc. Aspart of the demolition project, some heavily contaminated soils could be hauled off sitefor disposal.

It is expected that this property will be developed for recreational use. Since theconstruction of park would require landscaping, bern etc. the remediation plan shouldinclude using some of the low contamination material as fill under the paved parkinglots to reduce overall project cost. Based on actual testing of soils under the concreteslabs, some chemical additives may be desirable to mix and chemically bond themetals to prevent migration to groundwater. These measures also mitigate the knownand potential future exposure pathways by immobilizing the contaminants and buildingproviding effective barriers.

-34-

6.0 Baseline Risk Assessment6.1 Public Health Evaluation

Seneca Lake is located approxinately 0.3 mile on the east of the Foundry site. Thereis no identified surface stream or underground water supply aquifer within 0.25 mile ofthe Foundry. The SI data indicate a possible pathway of Leavy metal contaminationfrom the site. On-site data confirm the presence of aliphatic hydrocarbons, BTEX, andchlorinated compounds adj acent fo the Foundry building. Therefore, potential existsfor future mi.gration of these contaminants toward the natural gradient discharging infothe Lake. Test results show certain metals to be present in this area and increasedlevels of lead (747 mg/kg, 1,080 mgkg) and zinc (668 mgckg, 786 mgckg) were foundnear the site. This appears to be impacted by the air exhaust historically dischargedfrom the Foundry.

Some information related to these metals and their health consequences is presentedhere to provide general perspective {source -Water and man's Health, published byAgency for Intemational Development).

Lead is naturally present in trace amounts in certain ground water supplies. Higherconcentrations could result from past agricultural spraying of lead arsenate aspesticide. Humans via food, air and tobacco smoke also ingests lead. Average intakeper person is estimated to be approx. 0.32 mg of lead per day. Accumulation of lead inhuman body could occur if the daily intake of lead exceeds 0.6 mg/ day. .

The residences located around the site have gardens, which can ex|]ose the residentsvia inhalation of ingestion of any Lead present in the soil. Garden activities andvegetables could become the source of lead intake affecting human health. Therefore,remediation phase should include replacement of selected garden areas with freshtopsoil and lawn to prevent any health impact on the residents.

Zinc is normally found as trace element in natural waters. Mean concentration reportedin37langedrinkingwatersuppliesinUSA,.were0.136ppm.Zincisbeneficialelement in human metabolism with usual daily intake of 10 to 15 mg. Oral toxicity ofZinc compound is low and a metallic taste is observed above 40 ppm of zinc indrinking wa.ter. Since drinking water in the area is supplied by municipal water system,the exposure to people is elininated. This element present in garden soil at theadjacent residences could pose health impacts due to the vegetable gardening activitieswhen exposure to soil or dust could occur. Replacement of selected gardens withrelatively higner concentrations of metals would prevent such exposure and protect theenvirorment.

Arsenicisnafurallyfoundinhotsftringsasanir;enate.Surfacewaters.maybeimpacted by industrial and mining activities or past use of pes`ticides spray on `agriculturalland.Ifpresentindrirfugwatergthisisacontaminautofconcemwithlimits of 0.05 ppm. This element present in garden soil at the adjacent residences couldpose health inpacts due to the vegetable gardening activities when exposure to soil ordust could occur. Replacement of selected gardens with relatively higherconcentrations of metals would prevent such exposure and protect the environment.

-35-

Due to low level of risk and potential impacts on very small number of residencesadjacent to this site, conducting a baseline risk assessment was not deemed necessaryfor this site. Direct remediation of affected residential lot(s) is advisable at this tine.

6.2 Environmental Assessment

The residential and commercial properties located on Jackson St. and Exchange Street,are all served by public water and sewer facilities, and therefore, not exposed to anycontaminants contained in ground water.

The Contaminated soils located at the foundry site do not directly expose the residentsif they stay on their property. It is possible that some individuals may enter the foundrybuildings and be exposed to harmful and unsafe environgient. Past discharges ofmetals via air exhaust appears to have elevated the metal concentrations in certainresidences near the site. This condition represents potential exposure to the people andneedstoberemediatedaspartoftheprojectwhleremediatingthefoundrysite.

Seneca Lake is located on the East Side and no action could result in migration of thecontaminants present on this parcel to pollute this precious natural resource.

7.0 Summary and conclusions7.1 Summary

7.I.1 Nature and extent of contamination

A passive gas survey was conducted using 19 Emflux cartridges and identifiedthe soil gas concentrations in QTanogram§ ng/I). The testing locations werechosen to cover the perimeter of the Foundry facilities as well as six locationswithin the facilities. Most of the test location did not find any detectablecontamination either on site or off site. Only three locations were identifiedwhere afiphatic hydrocarbons or BTEX compounds were present. These area areshorn in the Erfubit

LOCATION ALIPHTIC HC Chlor,C. BTEX(ng/I) (ngA) (ng/I)

1. Jackson Street' 10.77 ND 1.23

Northern boundary of site2. Foundy Pit 74.78 0.55 32.53

3. Southern Boundary of site 5.45 1.97 1.89

-36-

Z%e feSf results s%ow ffe&! most likely accumulation of contaminants is near thepit area near "onitoring well #3 or passive gas survey location # 13, which isaway from the residential area on Jackson Street. Z%e givc[#Spo7.f a/confczmz.#¢7grsvia groundwater depends on the water levels.resulting from naturalprectpitedoninthearea.PastyearsOfsuch-diedonhasnotyctreachedtheresidences` However, if cohiact with groundwater is created in f iuture, andcozgsidering the ground water movement toward Southeasterly direction, thecontaminant would migrate away from these residential units cz7td cz#ect theresidential and commercial properties on Exchange Street. Test results near soilboring # SB-7 and passive gas survey point # 9 does not indicate the presence ofpetroleum compounds. Therefore the contaminants at this time are limited toprimarily ¢rcos 7!ear Foundry structures. Remediation activity should be partof the demolition work to excavate the contaminated soils, provide on sitetreatment or off site disposal based on the volume of material and economicfactors.

The test results of the boring hole soil samples and ground water indicate thatdetection of contaminants within the Foundry structures. No significant off sitevalues were found to indicate migration of contaminants fo off Site properties.Lack of corrective action would result in future migration of contaminants andtherefore requires preventive remediation of the site.

Considering the Foundry operation and possible air discharge of metal dustpardcles on the surrounding area, a garden sampling program was carried out intwo phases. Samples were collected from multiple locations as described insection 3.3 of this report.

The data shows that certain heavy metals a,Cad, Zinc and Arsenic)concentrations are relatively high in the area adj acent to Foundy operation.Considering the potential exposure to I?sidents and their past concerns it isadvisable to include site specific corrective action on certain adjacent properties.Some of the.test results are shown here to present a relative overview of gardensoils in the area.

LOCATIONasENIC LEAD ZINC

mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

Adjacent to Foundry34 Jackson Street 26.9 425 329234 Exchange 38.60 1210 . 949178 Exchange 24.6 1210 853

Away from Foundry21 State Street 15.90 491 741St. Frances RC Church 48.5 287 116

90 Center Street 25.6 780 840

-37-

7.2 Conclusions

The data collected during the site investigations should be reviewed from both onsiteand off site conditions ,

The on site values confim the presence of metals ( czrse#z.c, /ec!d a#d Zz.7icJ cz#daliphatic hydrocarbon, BTEX and chlorinated compounds adjacent to or within thefo;l]ndry sidHl!ch]res. These are conlawinaat Of concern and are f round to be abovenormal background values. Since the local cttizeus have raised concerns about themetal coatc[ndncttion, it would be advisable to address this isstte and renediate themost crf fected properties to background levels.

The da.ta indicates the presence of metal contamination adjacent to and within thebuilding structures. These structures are unsafe, and prevent access to remove andremediate the contaminated soil & ground water for preventing any future migration ofthese metals. homediate demolition of these facilities should be made as part of theremedial action so that the source of contamination can be either removed orimmobilized on site and the site converted to it's intended long term use as recreationalpark.

Considering the elevated values of metals in garden soil taken from adjacentresidential properties, there appears to be a link to past Foundry operation. Therefore,remediation activity should be included for selected residential properhes as a part ofthe foundry site remediation proj ect.

All of the yards have well established vegetation cover, providing a natural bufferwhere the metal values are lower than adjacent residences to the foundry. It is notnecessary to replace all of the garden topsoil on the properties as part of the siteremediation. Based on additional test data specific properties should be included in thercrm!ed]3f uorD prq3ect. It is reconanended that.a;dditional soft samples be taken as part Ofremediation design step to furl tier clef iane the extent Of soft removal and cor[trol prof eatcosts.

Recommended Remediation Objectives :

The Remedial Alternatives Report QAR) has been prepared and included a§ pat ofthis report. This RAR includes a detailed evaluation of various altematives. Thefacilities located on this site are old and present an unsafe environment due to thepresenceofcontaminantsinandunderthepits,whichwaspartofqesefoundryoperations. It is recommend that tbese structures should be demo fished and convertthis site to a recreatiolial park for the neighborhood.

It is recommended that demofishing plans be immediately prepared a§ a part of theBrownfield remediation so that the contractor would have access to the contaminatedsoils and groundwater, which can be removed and treated, on Site or taken off site forproper disposal. The contaminated material should be tested so that a decision can bemade for encapsula.tion and burial on site or diaposed off site based on volume andother economic considerations.

-38-

REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES REP ORT

FOR

BRowNFmLDS INVESTIGATloNGENHVA FOUNDRY SITE

CITY OF GENEVA, NEW YORK

Submitted By:

Passero Associates, P.C.100 Liberty Pole WayRochester, NY 14604

and

Larsen Hngineers700 W. Metro Park

Rochester, NI 14623

TABLE 0F CONTENTS

1.0 INTROD{jcTION ................... „ ............................................................... ` ...... 1

1.1 PLlrpose and organization of Report ............ „ ..............,........... „„ ..................... 1

1.2 Background Information ..................... „ ..... „ ....... „ ............................................. 11.2.1 Description ............,....................... „ ......................... „ ..... „ .............,. „ ............ " .......... 1

1.2.2 Site History..„ .................................................................. „.„ ............... „ ..... „ ..... „ ...... 1

1.2.3 Nature and Extent ofcoutanination ,.... 11.2.4 Contaminant Fate and Transport...„ ..............................................., „ .......`.......... „ ....... 11.2.5 BaselineRIskAssessment .,.... I

2.0 IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ...„ .... 12.1 Introduction „ .................................................................. n ................................... I

2.2 Remedial Action objectives ........ „...„ ........ „ ............ „...„ .... „ ................. „..m„ .... 2

2.3 General Response Actions .... „ ........ „ ..,......... „ .... ~ ....................................... „ ...... 3

2.4 Development of Alternatives ......... „ .................................................................... 3

3.0 DETALILED ANALLysIS OF ALTERNA:FIVES .......... in .............. u..u ........... 4

3.1 Introduction .......................................... „ .......... „ ................................................. 4

3.2 Individual Analysis of Alternatives ................ „M ................ „ ..... „.„ ................... 43.2.1 Altemative 1 .... 43.2.2 Altemative2.„„...„..„ ......,...... „..„ .... „...„..~ .... „„„ .......... „ .............. „..„„.53.2,3 Altemative 3 ,................. „ .... „„ ...... „ .................. „..„ ........ „„ ........ „ .................... 5

3.3 Comparative Analysis ............ „ ....................... : ........................................... „..„.. 5

IIIII

1.0 INTRODUCTIONI.1 Purpose and Organization of Report

The purpose of this report is to present the results of the RemedialAlternatives portion of the New York State Deparinent ofEnvfronmental Conservation QIYSDEC) Brownfields Sitehvestigation (SI) of the Geneva Foundry in the City of Geneva, NewYork, pursuant to the Contract (Change Order), signed by the City ofGeneva on November 30,1998.

1.2 Background Information

1.2.1.1.i Site Description-Refer to section 1.2.1 in sR

1.2.1.1.2 Site ffistory -Refer to section 1.2.2 in SIR

1.2.2 Nature and Extent of contamination -Refer to section 4 inSR

1.2.3 Contaminant Fate and Transport -Referto section 5 in sR

1.2.4 Baseline Risk Assessment -Refer to section 6 in SIR

2.0 IDENTIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES

2.1 Introduction

TheGenevaFoundyybuildingocoupie.sthemajorityofthesubjectsite; the reriaining part of land is mostly paved with asphalt, andsurrounded by residential and commercial properdes. The Foundrybuilding has been abandoned and is not currently in a usableccmdition. The process for development of remedial alternatives isbased on consideration of the City' s master plan for beneficial use ofthis property, while keeping the needs of the neighborhood in mind.Future use of this property directly impacts the strategy for clean up.

The Foundry building condition is unsafe for working, and thepotential for reuse of the structure is hich|y unlikely. The extent ofsub-slab contamination near the sump at the southeast comer of theFoundry has yet to be detemined. h order to fully investigateremedial options, the extent of sub-slab contamination should bedetermined. Therefore, the remedial altematives are all inclusive ofdemolishing the existing structures.

Ill

Passerotharsen contacted several local contractors that we have aworking relationship with to provide an esfz.z„czJe o#/y for the cost todemolish the Geneva Foundry building. Based on a measured 71,000-square-foot area of the building footprint, the cost to demolish theFoundry and remove the debris as construction/demolition debris(Cro) is estimated to be approximately $300,000.00.

The cost to remove all of the assumed asbestos-containing materialswill be in addition to demolition costs. Based on quantities ofassumed asbestos provided by City of Geneva NYSDOL-certifiedasbestos inspector Thorn Rafferty, the cost estimate to handle all ofthe assumed asbestos prior to and during demolition is in the $ 15,000to $20,000 range.

The actual prices for demolition and asbestos abatement will berlnalized in the bid process for contractor selection.

2.2 Remedial Action Objectives

TheFoundrysitecontainsbothheavymetalsandpetroleuncontaninatiap primarily located close to the building perimeter, orinside near the sump area. This site has primarily two mediums ofinterest,i.e.soilandgroundwater.TheSIdataindicatehighervaluesof total aliphatic hydrocarbons near monitoring well MW-4 onJackson Street, MW-3 inside the building, and Ow-2 on the southernboundary of the site. Chlorinated compounds and BTEX were alsodetected in MW-2 and MW-3. Removal of the contaminated soil andgroundwateratthepointsourcearerequiredtoprotecttheenvironment and prevent future migration.

The main objectives of the overall site remediation are

a. Removal (or permanent containment) of the pollution sources ofexisting contamination (above ground and subsurface). The goalofsiteremediationistoeitherreachcontaminantvaluesbelowdetection limits, or achieve complete sealing of the contariationsource area to block the pathway to potential human exposure.

b. Prevention offuture migration of potential c6ntainants such asLead, Zinc, and petroleum compounds.

c. Protection of adjacent properties from negative envirormentalinpacts from the Foundry site.

-2-

I0

II

d. Elimination of hazardous and/or unsafe conditions created by theabandoned building structures.

e. Redevelopment of the site for beneficial reuse, which win servethe area and result in overall enhancement of property values andgrowth within the community.

2.3 General Response Actions-

Based on the results of the soil and groundwater sampling, theprinary areas of contamination are between MW-4, MW-3, and MW-5. This ar?a encompasses approximately 30,000 square feet. If thesoils were removed to an average depth of 8 feet, the total quantity ofcontaminated soil excavated for off-site disposal would beapproxinately 240,000 cubic feet, or 9,000 cubic yards. The volumeof contaminated water is estimated to be 10,000 cubic feet, or 75,000gallons (depending on the water table during construction activity).The treatment, containment, or removal options would be evaluatedbased on these quantities.

2.4 Development of Alternatives

The Foundry Site contains unsafe structures used for operations whilethe Geneva Foundry was in operation. Most.of the sourcecontamination material is located under these structures, and notaccessible unless the structures are demolished. There is no potentialfuture use of the existing buildings; demolition of the Foundrybuildings is. an essential part of developing rquedial alfematives, andfuture redevelopment of the site.

After the Foundry buildings are removed, the site subsurface will beexposed to allow excavation of soils or in-srfu treatment and/orcontainment. The following remedial altematives will be consideredfor meeting the dy. ectives;

a. Altemative 1 -Excavation and removal of contaminated soils andground ira.ter near the source area.

b. Alternative 2 -Capping of the contaminated area, andconstruction of perimeter sluny wans on north, east.and southside of the site.

c. Alternative 3 -in-situ treatment of contaminated soils, and on-Site treatment of ground water.

-3-

3.0 DETAILED ANAI.YSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

3.1 Introduction

The above-mendoned altematives provide various methods to protectthe envirorment, and prevent future migration of heavy metals,aliphatic hydrocarbon, BTEX, and chlorinated compounds. Theprimary factors for evaluation and analysis are project cost, time tocomplete the project, acceptability by local residents, and degree ofprotection achieved.

3.2 Individual Analysis of Alternatives;

3.2.1 Alternative 1 -Excavation and removal of contaminated soilsand ground water near the source area.

3.2.1.i Description -Under this alternative the buildingwill be demolished and au materials transported toan approved C&D landfill site. The |]avementmaterial will also be removed and disposed on C&Dsite. The areas near MW4, -MW-3, and MW-5 willbe marked based on the site investigation testresults, fo remove the contaminated soils byexcavation. Field test kits will be used to analyzeheavy metals, and total petroleum hydrocarbons inthe excavated soils. Any water collected in theexcavated areas will be containerized for off-Sitedisposalatthewastewatertreatmentplant.

In addition, two residential sites on adjacent streetswould be selected for removal of the top 12 inchesof garden soil, and replacement with fresh topsoiland new lawns to prevent any future exposure toresidents.

3.2.1.2 Assessinent -This option offers the shortest tine toremove potential contamination source consisting ofboth soil and groundwater. Proper removal and off-site disposal will assure local residents that thesource material is no longer present on site, and thatremaining soils and subsurface conditions haveundetectable levels of the past contaminants. Thecost of this alternative is estinated to include$350,000 for demolition, $150,000 for soil diaposal,15,000 for garden soiMawn replacement and

-4-

$ 10,000 for groundwater treatment at the Genevawastewater treatment plant.

3.2.2 Altemative 2 -Capping of the contaminated area, andcoustmction of perimeter sluny walls on the north, east and

• south sides of the site.

3.2,2.1 Description -Under this alternative the building willbe demolished, and all materials transported to anapproved C&D landfill site. The pavement materialwill also be removed and disposed of as C/Dmaterial. The areas near MW-4, MW-3, and MW-5 .will be marked based on the site investigation testresults to totally contain and seal the contaminatedsoils by providing a 12 inch inpemeable soil andsynthetic plastic liner cap with topsoil and seeding toestablish ground cover vegetafron. in addition, aneight feet deep slurry wall will be constructed alongthree sides of the property to seal the area andcontain all of the contaminants from migratingtoward the south - east direction.

In addition, two residential sites on adjacent streetswould be selected for removal of the top 12 inches ofgarden soil, and replacement with fresh topsoil andnew lawn, preventing future exposure to residents.

3.2,2.2 Assessment -This option requires a relatively longertime to seal and contain potential contaminationsources consisting of both Contaminated soil andgroundwater. Proper contairment and on-site sealingis intended to assure the local residents that thesource material is sealed and would not be ablemigrate off the site. The cost of this altemative isestimated to include $3 50,000 for demolition,$100,000 for soil and synthetic liner cap, $60,000 for12001inear feet {IJF) of slurry wan, and $15, 000 forgarde.nsoiIAaunreplacement.

3.2.3 Alternative 3 -in situ treatment of contaminated soils, and on-site treatment of ground water

-5-

3.2.3.1 Description -Under this altemative, the buildingwould be demolished, and all materials transported toan approved C&D landfill site. The pavementmaterial will also be removed and disposed of as C®material. The areas near MW4, MW-3, and MW-5will be marked based on the site investigation testresults to treat the contaminated soils in situ andremove the groundwater for treatment. The soil willbe excavated and mixed with chemicals, which crea.tea chemical bond and provide fixation of metals toprevent any leaching. Treated soil will be re-deposited in the excavated area. Any groiindwatercollected in the pit will be removed and transportedto the Geneva wastewater treatment plant.

h addition, two residential sites on adjacent streetswould be selected for removal of top 12 inches ofgarden soil and replaced with fresh top soil and newlawn to prevent any exposure to residents in future.

3.2.3.2 Assessment -`Ihis option would require a relativelylonger time to excavate and treat the soil to containmetals and petroleum compounds for preventingpotential contamination of both soil and groundwater.Proper chemical treatment and on-site mixing andplacement is intended to assure the local residentsthat the contaminated Soil is treated, and metals or|]etroleuln compounds would EQ± be able to migrateoff site. The cost of this alternative is estimated toinclude $3 50,000 for dem6lition, $ 180,000 for soiltreatment @ 20.00 per cubic yard, and $10,000 fortreatment of 75,000 gallons of contaminatedgroundwater, and $15, 000 for garden soiMawnreplacement.

3.3 Comparative Analysis

Thealtemativesdescribedaboveaerelativelyciese.incostofremediation. Therefore, other factors such as completion tine andpublic acceptance become an important factor in final selection of theselected remedy.

-6-

It is evident that the alternative #1 offers the fastest response at areasonable cost and least risk for public perception that pollutantscould potentially migrate off site. Source removal of the contaninatedmaterial offers the best option to eliminate public concerns.

Upon considering of all of the factors discussed above, werecommend that the City implement the Alternative # 1 as soon aspossible, with the financial assistance from N.Y.S. D.E.C. under theBrownfield grants program.

ms

'1

Ifl

i.``.?: i`:-.'` i.\t i:i.: :`i.`i.t,:`` \ :i=` `:,:.I:; i, ..:` i!-.`, `! :i.`.:? ;-.`:; `:```:.``. `

T-..i&.L`:-:i,:-=¥iF:TT:€,¥i:t&:"REI..

§®as¥RE §.€EB8 asp B®asisiBR¥

RE®EBTifi §8EBg #rfusKS®as Sffasg8=F P&fieBaa

li

€,

fl':

•1

i`:`=i `?:I i.t.`.i!` f`:`::., -``,.`'',i.`:..`:h.`` !`.: ::.::::: ;.i -:i i:. i`i I-`.! iT.``.:i `,'i...`-

E=.3grB. gip ©gg3£E i

®3tw.Ra S.F&@}asg AaEA

APPENDIX 2 - SUMP ANALYSIS

.®

COLUMBIA+ ANAIIYTICAI- SERVICESVOLATILE ORGANICSRETHOD 82608 TCLReported: 05/14/99

:I

!E

;i

!E

blE

[j

li

[[

;I

IH

11

;I

:.I

•H

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sa]nple ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

Date SaJnpled : 04/20/99 Order #: 286555 Saple laatrix: SOIL/SEDIMENTI)ate Received: 04/21/99 . Slibmission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 74.0

ANALYTE P Qlj RE S UI]T UNITS

DATE ANALYZEDANALYTICAL DIIjuTION :

05 / 03 / 991.00

ACETONEBENZENEBROMODICHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMBROMOMETHENE2 -BurENdNE (XPK)CARBON DIsunFIDECARBON TETRACHLORIDECHLOROBENZENECHljoROETENECIII.OROFORMCHLOROMETIIAmEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1, 1 -DICHI]OROETHANE1,. 2 -DICHI.OROETHANE1,1 -DICHI-OROETHENECIS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETIIENETRANS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETHENE1, 2 -DICHljoROPROPANEGIS -1, 3 -DICHLOROPROPENETRANS -1, 3 -DICHI.OROPROPENEETHYI]BENZENE2 - HEENOREMETHYliENE CHLORIDE4-METHYL-2 -PENTANONE (MIBK)STYRERE1 , 1 , 2 , 2 -TETRACHI]OROETHANETETRACHI]OROETHENETOI.UENE1, 1, 1 -TRICHLOROETHANE1, 1, 2 -TRICHljoROETHANETRICHLOROETHENEVINIlj CHLORIDE0-XYljENEM+P-XYLBNE

SURROGATE RECOVERIES

4 -BROMOFLUOROBENZENETOLUENE-D8DIBROMOFLUOROMETIIANE

QC IJIMITS

Dry Weight

TJJS/RTfsUf3/RTfsUG/KGTuf3/RTf3TJis|RTfsuf±/RTf±Tre/RTfiur±/RTfiTJfi/Fxf3

•E

;I

E

lD

!b

iE

ij

iE

[E

[j

[E

il

[1

lD

iD

iD

I

Col.UlmlA ANAL¥TICAI, SERVICES

Passero Associates, PCProj ect Reference : GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sample ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

VOLATII]E 0RGANICSRETHOD 82608 TCLReported: 05/14/99

Date Sa]npled : 04:/20/99 Order #: 286555 Sample Matrix: SOII-/SEDIMENDate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 74.0

ANALYTE P Q Ij R E SULT UNI TS

DATE ANAI.YZEDANALYTICAL DILUTION:

U5 / rJ3 / 991.00

ACETONEBENZENEBROMODICHLORORETHANEBROMOFORMBROMORETTENE2 -BUTANONE (MEK)CARBON DISUI.BIDECAREON TETRACHLORIDECHLOROBENZENECHLOROETFHRECHLOROFORMCHLORORETIIANEDIBROMOCHLORORETHANE1, 1 -DICHLOROETHANE1, 2 -DICHI]OROETHANE1, 1 -DICHLOROETHENECIS -1, 2 -D I CHLOROETHENETRANs -1 , 2 -DlcHLOROETHErvE1, 2 -DICHLOROPROPANECIS -1 , 3 -DICHLOROPROPENETRANS -1, 3 -DICHLOROPROPENEBTHyLBEDrzERE2 - HEXENONEMETHYLERE CHI]ORIDE4-METHYL-2 -PENTANONE (MIBK)STYRENE1, i, 2 , 2 -TETRACHljoROETHANETETRACHI-OROETHENETOI]UERE1, 1, 1 -TRICHLOROETHANE1, 1, 2 -TRICHLOROETHANETRICHLOROETHENEVINYL CHLORIDEO-XYLENEM+P-XYLENE


4 -BROMOFLUOROBENZENETOLUENE~D8DIBROMOFljuoROMETIIANE

QC IJIMITS

Dry Weight

Tre/RTf3UG/KGUfs/FlfsUf3/RTf3Or±/RTf3Ufi/RTf3TIE/RIf±Uf±lRTfiuri/RTfiTyK±/rJG `UG/KGufi/RTf±Tva/RTfiUf3/RTf3Uis|RTf 3 .UG/KGTyG/RTf3UG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGor3/RTfiTyi3|RTfsT]fe/RTfiUie/TRT±Uf3/RTfiUG/KGTJft/RTf3TJR)/RTf±

Tyie/RTfiari/RTfirule/TNfsUfi/RTf3ur3/RTfiTJf3/RT£

I.

lD

[ri

[i

!E

[i

[i

[i

h

III

!D

e61.UMBIA _ANAI]yTlcAL sEivlcEs

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIEI]DSClieat Saniple ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

VOIATILE ORGANICSMETHOD 82608 TCLReported: 05/14/99

Date Sampled : 04/20/99 Order #: 286556 Sample matrix: SOIL/SEDIMENTDate Received: 04/21/99 Sufomission #: 9904000318 Percept Solid: 74.7

ANELYTE PQL. RESUI]T UNITS

DATE ANAI]YZEDANALYTICAL DILUTION :

05 / rf3 / 991.00

ACETONEBENZENEBROMODICHLOROMETHANEBROMOFOENBROMORETENE2 -BU-TANONE (REK)CARBON DISULFIDECARBON TETRACHljoRIDECHI-OROBENZENECHLOROETHENECHLOROFORMCHLORORETHANEDIBROMOCHI-OROMETHANE1,1 -DICHLOROETHANE1, 2 -DICHI.OROETHANE1,1 -DICHI]OROETHENEGIS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETHENETRANS -1, 2 -DICHIIOROETHENE1, 2 -DICHLOROPROPANECIS -1, 3 -DICHLOROPROPENETRANS -1, 3 -DICHLOROPROPENEETHYLBENZENE2 - HEXENONEMETHYljENE CHI]ORIDE4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK)STYRENE1 , 1 , 2 , 2 -TETRACHLOROETHANETETRACHI]OROETHENETOLUENE1 , 1, 1 -TRICHljoROETIIANE1, 1, 2 -TRICHLOROETHANETRICHI.OROETHENEVINYlj CHLORIDE0 - XYljENEM+ P -XYI-ENE


4 -BROMOFLUOROBENZENET0I.UENE-D8DIBROMOFLUORORETHANE

QC LIMITS

Dry Weight

Tyf±/T«f3ar±/RTfiTJf±/RT&Tuft/TRETvs/RTf3ur±/REFSUG/KGTJ/ielRTG

UG/KG

:8/KgTJf3|RTf3TJ,f±/RTfiur±lRTfiTyf3/RTfsTJK3/Flf3Uf3/TZ(f3Ufi/YJf±TJlelRTfiTyf3|RTfe.

UG/KGUf±/RTf3Tre/RTfiTJi3/YIGUG/KGUG/KGuf±/FJf3TrerF!f3UG/KGTyf±lRTfi

Uf3/RTf3tat,lRTfi

UG/KGTyf3|RTfi

COI.UMBIA ANAI]YTICAli SERVICES

IIIIIIH

[b

ii

!D

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIEIIDSClient Sample 11) : FOUNDRY SUMP

VOIATILE ORGANICSRETHOD 82608 TCI]Reported: 05/14/99

Date Sampled : 04/20/99 Order #: 286556 Sample lfatrix: SOIL/SEDIMEN`Date Received: 04/21/99 Submission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 74.7

ENALYTB PQI]. RESULT UNITS

05 / rJ3 / 991.00

DATE ANAliYZEDANAI-YTICAL DILUTION :

ACETONEBENZENEBROMODICHLOROMETHANEBROMOFOREBROMOMETENE2 -BUTANONE (MEK)

L CARBON DISUI;FIDicanBON TETRACHLORIDECHljoROBENZENECHI]OROE±CHLOROFOENCHljoRORETHANEDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE1,1 -DICHLOROETHANEI, 2 -DICHLOROETIIANE1,1 -DICHLOROETHENEGIS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETHENETRANS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETHENE1, 2 -DICHLOROPROPANE

i - CIS-1, 3 -DICHLOROPROPENE

IIIII

•E

TRANS -1, 3 -DICELOROPROPENEETHYLBENZENE2 - HEXANONEMETHYI.ENE CHLORIDE4: -METHYI.-2 -PENTANONE (MIBK)STYRENE1 , 1 , 2 , 2 -TETRACHI-OROETHANETETRACHI.OROETHENETOLUENE1, 1, 1 -TRICHLOROETIIANE1, 1, 2 -TRICHI]OROEHIANETRICHLOROETHENEVINIL CHLORIDE`0-XYliENEM+P-XYLENE


4 -BROMOFljuoR0BENZENETOLUENE-D8DIBROMOFLUOROMETHANE

QC IJIMITS

Dry Weight

TJ/firK!f±Tre/RTfiUf3/RTf3UG/KGTJ/ie/YJf3ur±/RTfior±/RTf3TJ/£/RTfiUG/KGURi/RTfiTJf3/RTf±

UG/KGTIirs/RTfi

UG/KGTIti/Yre -Tl/f±/RTfs

Uf3/RTfiUf3/RTf3UG/KGTJ/fs|TRE.

Ufs/RTfsUG/KGTJf3|RTf 3 .

UG/KGTJ'3/RIf3Uf3/K!f±Tuf3/RTf3

Or±/RTf±Uf3/RTf±TJft/RTfiTyfs/RTf±TJG/RTfiTJf3/RTf3

Uft/RTfiUfe/Tf(a

t6IjmaslA_ ANALYTICAL sERvlcEs

II!d

Passero Associates, PCProj fct Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Saxple ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

EXTRACEABI.E 0RGENICSMETHOD 8270C SEMIVOLATIItESReported: 05/14/99

Date SaJnpled : 04;/20/99 Order #: 286558 Sample Matrix: SOII./SEDIMENTDate Received: 04/21/99 Stomission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 71.5

ANAL YTE P QI] RE SUI.T UNI TS

DATE EXTRACTEI)I)ATE ANAI.YZEDANAliYTICAlj DILUTION :

ACENAPHTHENEACENAPHTHYLENEanHRACENEBENzo (A) ANTlmACENEBENZO (A) PYRENE

I - BENZO (B) FLUORANTIIENE

[j

:I

d:I

III

0 4 I 2:3 / 9904J 30 / 99

5.00

BENZO (G, H,I) PERYLENEBENZO ( K) FLUORANTHENEBENZYL ELCOHOLBUTYL BENZYlj PHTHALATEDI-N-BUTYI.PHTHALATECjREAZOLEINDENO ( 1 , 2 , 3 - CD ) PYRENE4 -CHljoROANII.INEBIS ( -2 -CHL.OROETHOXY) METIIANEBIS ( 2 -CHLOROETHYL) ETHER2 - CHLORONAPHTHAI]ENE2 - CHLOROPHENOI.2 , 2 I -OXYBIS ( 1 -CHLOROPROPANE )CHRYSENEDIBENZO (A, H) ANTHRACENEDIBENZOFURAN1, 3 -DICHljoROBENZENE1, 2 -DICHLOROBENZENE1, 4 -DICHLOROBENZENE3 , 3 I -DICHljoROBENZIDINE2 , 4 -DICHLOROPHENOLDIETHYLPHTIIALATEDIMETRTII PHTHALATE2 , 4 -DIMETHYLPHENOL2 , 4 -DINITROPHENOIj2 , 4 -DINITROTOI.UENE2 , 6 -DINITROTOIjuENEBIS ( 2 -ETHYI.HEXYL ) PHTIIAljATEFLUOENTHENEFLUORENEHEXACHljoROBENZENEHEXACHljoROBUTADIENEHEXACHI.OROCYCLOPENTADIENEHEXACHLOROETHANEISOPHORONE2 -METHYljNAPHTIIAI.ENE4 , 6 -DINITRO -2 -METHYLPHENOIj

330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300670 4700330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300330 2300

23002`3 0 0470023002300.470091002300230041002300230023002300230023002300

670 47001300 9100

Dry Weight

T]f3/RTf±Uf3/RTfiTJfi/RTf3Uf3/FJf±UG/KGTIti/RTfiTIt3/RTf3UG/KGTue/RTf3TJf3/RT£Tue/RTf3

ufi/RTfiufe/RIf3ur=/RTfi .TJ/i3lRTfiTyf3/RTf3

UG/KGUft/RTfi

• T]rs |TRT£ .

uG/KGTyfi/RTfiur±/RTfiur±/RTfiuG/KGTJfi/RTfiur±/K!fiUG/KGTItirRIfiur3/RTf±Uf3/RTf±Uf3|RTf3Vie/RTfiTJfilRTfiUfi/RTfiTJf3/RTf±

UlelRTf±ura/RTfiurs/RTfsTyf3/RTf±Tre / riff iUG/KGTut/RTfiTdfe|RTG

col-umBIA ANAL¥TICAI] sERvlcEs

Passero Associates, PCProj ect Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sample ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

b

EXTRACTABLE ORGANICSMETHOD 8270C SBMIVOIjATILESReported: 05/14/99

Date Sapled : 04/20/99 Order #: 286558 SaJxple matrix: SOIL/SEDIMENTI)ate Received.s 04/21/99 . Submission #: 9904000318 Percent Solids 71.5

RE SUI.T UN I TSANAI]YTEI__ . - -

DATE EXTRACTEDDATE ANALYZEDANALYTICAli I)IIjuTION :

04/2[3/9904/30/99

5.00

4 -CHI-ORO -3 -METHYI]PIIENOL2 -METHYI-PHENOL4 -METHYI]PHENOLNAPHTHAljERE2 -NITROANILINE

r - 3-NITROANII.IINE

fl

biH

[b

I[i

4 -NITROANILINENITROBENZENE2 -NITROPHENOI.4 -NITROPHENOLN-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINEN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINEDI-N-OCTYL PHTRALATEPENTACHI.OROPHENOLPHENAVHRENEPHENoll4 -BROMOPHEN.YI. -PHENYI]ETHER4 -CHI]OROPHENYI. -PHENYI]ETHERN-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYljAMINEPYRENE1, 2 , 4 -TRICHLOROBENZENE2 , 4 , 6 -TRICHLOROPHENOL2 , 4 , 5 -TRICHIIOROPHENOL


TERPHENYL -dl4NITROBENZENE - d5PHENOI.-d62 -FI]UOROBIPHENYL2 - FljuoROPHENOI-2 , 4 , 6 -TRIBROMOPHENOL

QC IJIMITS

Dry Weight .

T]f3/RTf±uG/KGTJft/TZ!f3UG/KGur±/RTf±TJ&/REFS

ur3rRIfiTJf3/RTfiUG/KGTJf3/RTf3TJf3/RTETJfi}/RTf3TJf±lRTfiuR,/RTfi .TyR|/RTf3TJRi/RTfiTura|RTfiUG/KGT]rs/RTfi.Tyf i rf !f iTyfa|RTfiUfs/RTfiTJf±lRT£

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAI- SEE:VICES

Passero A§sociates, PCProj eat References GENEVA BROWNFIEljDSClient Sample ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

EXIRAC±ABIE ORGAHICSMETHOD 8270C SEMIVOLATIIjESReported: 05/14/99

Date Sampled : 04:/20/99 Order #: 286557 Saple Matrix: SOIL/SEDIRERTDate Received: 04/21/99 . Submission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 80.5

ANELYTE PQL. RESuljT UNITS

DATE EXTRACTEDI)ATE ANAljYZEDANALYTICAL DIIjuTI0N :

04 I 2;3 I 9904J 30 / 99

10 . 00

ACENAPHTHENEACENAPHTHYLENEENTHRACENEBENzo (A) ANTlmACENEBENZO (A) PYREREBENZO (a ) FLUORANTHENEBENZO (G , H , I ) PERYI]ENEBENZO ( K) FLUORANTHENEBENZYL AljcoHOLBUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEC2RBAZOI.EINDENO ( 1 , 2 , 3 - CD ) PYRENE4 -CHLOROANILINEBIS ( -2 -CHLOROETHOXY ) RETIIANEBIS { 2 -CHljoROETHYI. ) ETHER2 - CHLORONAPHTHAliENE2 - CHI.OROPHENOL2 , 2 I -OXYBIS ( 1 -CHLOROPROPANE )CHRYSENEDIBENZO (A, H) ANTHRACENEDIBENZOFURAN1, 3 -DICHlioROBENZENE1, 2 -DICHI.OROBENZENE1, 4 ~ DICHI.OROBENZENE3 , 3 I -DICHIIOROBENZIDINE2 , 4 -DICHI-OROPHENOLDIETHYI.PHTIIALATEDIMETHYL PHTHAIATE2 , 4 -DIMETHYI].PHENOL2 , 4 -DINITROPHEN0Ij2 , 4 -DINITROTOLUENE2 , 6 -DINITROTOLUENEBIS ( 2 -ETHYLHEXYL ) PHTHAI]ATEFLuOFLanHEREFLUORENEHEXACELOROBENZENEHEXACHLOROBUTADIENEHEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIE.NEHEXACHljoROETIIANEISOPHORONE2 -METHYLNAPHTHAljENE4 , 6 -DINITRO -2 -METHYLPHEN0I]

41004100410041004100410041004100410041004100410041004100410041004100830041004100

41004100410041004100

330 4100330 4100330 4100670 8300

1300 16000

Dry Weight

ur±/RTf3TJf3/RT£Tre/RTfsUf3/RTfsTre/RTfiUf3/RTfiTre/RTfiUG/KGUfi/RTfiTJR|/RTf3UG/KGUf3/RTfiari/RTf±TJG/TZJfiTUf3/RTfi

Uf3/RTfsuri/RTfiUfi/RTfiTyR,|RTf3.TJG/RTfiUfs/RTfiUG/KGUr3/RTf±UG/KGUG/KGTre/RTf3Uf3/RTfiuf i rK!f 3Tuf3/RTfiTIti/RTfiTJf3|RTf±

UG/KGUG/KGUG/KGTuf3/RTfs

UG/KGUie/RTf±UG/KGTre/RTf3uG/KGuG/KGTITS/TfJfi

UG/KG

tbl]umlA ENAI.¥TlcAI. sERvlcEs

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient SaJnple ID : FotJNDRY SUMP

[i

ib

!fi

[d

[E

lj

iE

[E

n11

(I

(I

11

lD

!H

EXTRACTABIiE 0RGANICSMETHOD 8270C SEMIVOIjATIIiESReported: 05/14/99

Date Saxpled : 04/20/99 Order #= 286557 Sample l¢atrix: SOIIj/SEDIMENTDate Received: 04/21/99 . Submission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 80.5

AN:ALYTE PQli. RESUI]T UNITS

DATE EXTRACTED : 04/23/99DATE ANALYZED : 04/30/99ANAljYTICAL DIIiuTION :

4 -CHLORO -3 -METHYI-PHENOI.2 -METHYI]PIIENOL4 -METHYI]PHENOLNAPHTELENE2 -NITROANI IjlNE3 -NITROANILINE4-NITROANII-INENITROBENZENE2 -NITROPHENOL4 -NITROPHENOLN-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINEN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINEDI -N-OCTYI- PHTHALATEPENTACHLOROPHENOIjpHENanHRERTEPHENOL4 -BROMO PHENYli -PHENYI-ETHER4 - CHljoROPHENYI] - PHENYI]ETHERN-NITROSO-DI~N-PROPYI.AMINEPYRENE1, 2 , 4 -TRICHLOROBENZENE2 , 4 , 6 -TRICHLOROPHENOL2 , 4 , 5 -TRICHLOROPHENOIi


TERPHENYI]-dl4NITROBENZENE -d5PHENOI.-d62 -FLUOROBI PHENYL2 -FLUOROPHENOI.2 , 4 , 6 -TRIBROMOPHENOL

QC IJIMITS

10 . 00

670670670330330330330330670

Dry Weight

Tra|RTf±Tre/RTfiTJfi/RTf±ar3/RTfiar3/RTfiTJft/RTfiTne/RTfiTue/RTfiUft/RTfiTJfi/RTfiUG/KGufi/RTfiTre/KJf±UG/KGTJG / RTf 3TJf3/RIGUf3/RTfs .TJfi/RT£Uf3/RTf±.UG/KGTJie/RTfiUG/KGur±/RTfi

COLUREIA ENAI]YTICAli SERVICH=S

Pa.ssero Associates, PCProject Reference : GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sample ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

Reported: OS/14/99

Date Sampled : 04/20/99I)ate Rec!eived: 04/21/99

ANAliYTE

Order #: 286559Submission #:9904000318

REstJLT

Sariple llatrix : SOIL/SEDIpqNT

DRY WEIGHT DATEUNITS ANAI;YZEI)

AELYTICELDIIJUTION

RETAI,SAIt7MINUMjRTIMONYansENlcBanlunBERyl,I,IurcroMlunCELC:IUMCHROMltJMCOBAI'TCOPPERIRONIJEADMAGREsltJMENGRESEMERCURYNICKEIIPOTASSI"SEI,ENI"SII;veRSODIUMTELI)ItJMVziNADIUMZINC I

WET CHEHISTRYPERCENT SC)LIDS

10.06.001.002.00

a.5000.50050.01.005.002.0010.05.0050.01.00

0 . 05004.00

2000 .5001.0050.0i.005.002.00

21707.39 U1.2320.9

0.616 U6.05182015.57.0431.5767021.8

805114

0.0616 U9.01

4150 . 6511.23 0

5221.23 U6.16 U'

483

1-0 81.2

I

05 104 / 99 1.0

cormBIA ANALirTlcAI] sERvlcEs

Passero Associates, PCProject Reference: GENEIA BROunlELDSC:1ient Sample ID : FOUNDRY §mff

Reported: 05/14/99

I)ate saxpled : 04/20/99 Order #= 286560 Sample mtrix: SOII./SEDIRENTDate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #:9904000318

I)RY WEIGIIT DATE ANAliYTICAI,ANIYTE PQI- RESULT UNITS JANAliYZED DII.UTION

WET CHEMISTRYPERCENT SOI.IDSTOTEL CYANII)E

1.00.500

•..

73.20.683 U

%MG/KG

CJ5 I 04 I 9904/3r)/99

I.01.0

INORGANIC - 6

•Cbl]UMBIA ANAI.YTICAL SERVICES

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sa]nple ID : FOUNDRY SUMP

EXTRACTABhE 0RGANICSMETHOD 8082 PCB'SReported:. 05/14/99

Date Samplecl : 04/20/99 Order #: 286561 Sample Matrix: SOIIj/SEDIMENTI)ate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #: 9904000318 Percent Solid: 75.0

ANAI-YTE PQL. RESULT UNITS

DATE EXTRACTEDDATE ANAljYZEDANAI+YTICAL DILUTION :

SURROGATE RECOVERIES QC IJIMITS

0412:319904 / 2:3 / 99

1.00

DECACHLOROBIPHENYI-TETRACHljoRO -RETA-XYLENE

Dry Weight

UG/KGTJf±lRTfiTJf±/RIGur±/RTf3ar3/RTf3Uf3/RTfiUG/KG

AVPENDIX 3 - FELLED PIT ANALYSIS

COLUREIA ANAI]YTICAL SERVICES

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSCliellt Saxple ID = FOUNDRY FILliED PIT

VOLATILE ORGENICSRETHOD 82608 TCI]Reported: 05/14/99

Date Sampled : 04/21/99 Order #: 286825 Sample MatriJc: SOIIj/SEDIREBDate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #: 9904000333 Percent Solid: 87.9

ANALYTE P Qlj RE SUI-T 1[JNITS

DATE ANALYZEDANALYTICAL DII.UTI0N :

OS I 03 I 991.00

ACETONEBENZENEBROMODICHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMBROMOMETENE2-BUTANORE (MEK)CARBON DISULFIDECARBON TETRACHLORIDECHLOROBENZENECHlioROET±CHI]OROFORMCHI]OROMETHANEDIBROMOCHI.OROMETHANE1, 1 -DICHljoROETIIANE1 , 2 -D I CHLOROETIIANE1, 1 -DICHljoROETHENEGIS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETHEN.ETRANS -1, 2 -DICHI-OROETHENE1, 2 -DICHLOROPROPANEGIS -1, 3 -DICHI.OROPROPENETRANS -1, 3 -D ICHljoROPROPENEETHYLBENZENE2 - HEENONEMETHYljENE CHljoRIDE4-METHYL-2 -PENTANONE (MIBK)STYRENE1 , 1 , 2 , 2 -TETRACHLOROETHANETETRACHI.OROETHENETOLUENE1 , 1 , 1 -mlcHI]oROETIIANE1 , 1 , 2 - TRICHljoROETHANETRICHLOROETHENEVINYL CHI-ORIDE0-XYljENEM+P-XYljENE


4 -BROMOPI-UOROBENZENETOIjuENE-D8DIBROMOFLUOROMETHANE

QC IJIMITS

8260 - 4

Dry Weight

ur±/TRIf3Uft/F(fiTJf3/TRTf3

Uf3/RTfsTJf3/RTf±Tuie/RTfsUf±/RTf±Ufi/RTf±Tre/Tz!fiTyfi/YxfiUfi/RTfsur3/RTf±UG/KGTJft/RTf±

g8/£8 .Ufi/RTf3TJf3/RTf±TJie/RTfiTJfe/TZJ&UG/KGur±/RTf3TJ/f3/RTfiufe/RTf3Ufi/rf!f±T3f3/TRTfi

UG/KGTue/RTf±ur3/RTf3TJfi/RTfiUG/KGUf3/RTfiryR/RTfsUf3/RTf3ur3/RTfi

COI]UMEIA ENAI-YTICAL SERVICES

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIEljDSClient Sample ID : FotJNDRY FILLED PIT

VOLATILE ORGENICSMETHOD 82608 TCLReported: 05/14/99

Dat.e Saxpled : 04/21/99 Order #: 286825 Sample Matrix: SOII]/SED|RENDate Received: 04/21/99 ` Submission #= 9904000333 Percent Solid: 87.9

ANALYTE P QL RE SULT tJNITS

DATE ANALYZEDANALYTICAL DILtJTION :

05 I 03 I 991.00

ACETONEBENZENEBROMODICHLOROMETHANEBROMOFORMBROMORETHRE2 -BUTANONE (REK)CARBON DISuliFIDECARBON TETRACHLORIDECHLOR0BENZENECHljoROETHENECHLOROFORECHI]ORORE±DIBROMOCHLOROMETIIANE1, 1 -DICHI.OROETIIANE1, 2 -DICHLOROETHANE1,1 -DICHLOROETHENEGIS -1, 2 -DICHLOROETHENETRANS -1, 2 -DICHljoROETHENE1, 2 -DICHLOROPROPANEGIS -1, 3 -DICHLOROPROPENETRANS -1, 3 -DICHlioROPROPENEETIIYLBENZENE2 - HEXANONERETHYIIENE CHljoRIDE4:-METHYL-2 -PENTANONE (MIBK)STYRENE1 , 1 , 2 , 2 -TETRACHljoROETHANETETRACHLOROETHENETOLUENE1, 1, 1 -TRICHljoROETHANE1 , 1, 2 -TRICHLORORTHANETRICHI.OROETHENEVINYI] CHLORIDEO-XYljENEM+P-XYLENE


4 -BROMOFI.UOROBENZENETOI.UENE-D8DIBROMOFLUOROMETIIANE

:I

QC LIMITS

8260 - 5

1507-55.75.75.7

20llU

5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7.U5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7U5.7U5-7U5.7UllU1911

5.75.75.79.25.75.75.75.75.75-7

28*86

162*

Dry Weight

Uft/RTf±UG/KGTJf 3 I YJ£Ufs/RTfiUG/KGTyfs/Tzjf3Uf3/RTfiTre/RTf±UG/KGTyf3/RT€UG/KGTJ/ft/RTfiUG/KGTur±/RT£Tre/RTfsur±/RTf±

JJft/FJ£TJfi/RIGT]f3/RTf3

-TIt±1RTfi

TJf3/RT£UG/KGUfi/RTfiTJf±lRT£UG/KGTre/RTf3TJfs/RTf±UG/KGTyR/TRTfi

UG/KGur3/RTf3Uf3/RTf±Uf3/K!f3UG/KGUG/KG

C-OI]UREIA ANAIIYTICAli SERVICESEXTRACTABIiE ORGANICSRETHOD 8270C SEMIVOLATILESReported: 05/14/99

ID

ID

.Ii.I

I

Passero Associates, PCProj ect Reference.: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sample ID : FOUNDRY FIIjLED PIT

Date Sampled : 04:/21/99 Order #: 286825 Sample Matrix: SOII]/SEDIRENDate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #: 9904000333 Percent Solid: 87.9

ANALYTE PQ L RE S ULT tJNI TS

DATE EXTRACTEDI)ATE ANALYZEDANALYTICAI] DIIjuTI0N :

04 / 2:3 I 9904 I 30 / 99

2.00

ACENAPHTHENEACENAPHTHYLENEanHRACENEBENZO (A) ANTIIRACENEBBNZO {A) PYRENEBENZO { a ) FI-UORANTHENEBENZO (G, H,I) PERYLENEBENZO ( K) FI]UORANTHENEBENZYL AljcoHOI]BUTYI] BENZYL PIITHALATEDI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATEcanBAzOLEINDENO ( 1 , 2 , 3 - CD ) PYRENE4 -CHLOROANII]INEBIS ( -2 -CHLOROETHOXY) METHANEBIS ( 2 -CHljoRORTHYL) ETHER2 -CHLORONAPHTHAI]ENE2 -CHI.OROPHENOL2 , 2 I -OXYBIS ( 1 -CHLOROPROPANE )CHRYSENEDIBENZO (A, H) ANTHRACENEDIBENZOFUEN1, 3 -DICHLOR0BENZENE1, 2 -DICHI.OROBENZENEi, 4 -DICHLOROBENZENE3 , 3 I -DICHlioROBENZIDINE2 , 4 -DICHljoROPHENOIjDIETHyLplmlALATEDIRETHYL PHTIIAIIATE2 , 4 -DIMETHYI]PHENOL2 , 4 -DINITROPHENOL2 , 4 -DINITROTOLUENE2 , 6 -D INITROTOIjuENEBIS { 2 -ETHYLHEXYI] ) PHTHAIATEFI]UORZRTHENEFliuoRENEHEXACHLOR0BENZENEHEXACHLOROBUTADIENEHEXACELOROCYCLOPENTADIENEHEXACHlioROETHANEISOPHORONE2 -METHYENAPHTHALENE4 , 6 -DINITRO -2 -METHYLPHENOL

330330330330330

330330330330330330330670330330670

13'00330330330330330330330330330330670

1300

Dry Weight

TJierfJ&TJ&/RTf3UG/KGTufi/RTfiTjf3/RTJSTyfs/Flf±TIE/RTfiUG/KGUG/KGTJRilRTfiTIt/RTf3nyfa/RT£UG/KGTUG/RTfi

Ufs/RTfiufi/RTf±Tife/RTfsUf±/RTf3ryG/TRIfiTJG/RTf±TJf3/RTfiryfe/RTf3TdR3 rRIf aTuft/RTfsTue/RTf3TIti/RTf±UG/KGur±|RTfsTus/RTf3Ufi/TfJfiurs/RTfiTyr3|RTfiUG/KGUfi/RTfiTyR±/RTfs

Uf3/RTfiur±|RTf3nyfs/RTf3UG/KGTJf3/RTf3Tuf3/raeTyf±|RTf3Tyle/RTfi

a,7n . i

col.urmlA ANAI]yTlcAI, .sERvlcEs

!D

•[j

b

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sample ID : FOUNDRY FIIiljED PIT

EXTRACTABLE ORGANICSMETHOD S270C SEMIVOLATII]ESReported: 05/14/99

Date Sampled : 04/21/99 Order #: 286825 Sample Matrix: SOIL/SEDIMENTDate Received: 04/21/99 Submissicm #: 9904000333 Percent Solid: 87.9

ANAL YTE PQli RE SULT UNI TS

DATE EXTRACTED : 04/23/99DATE ANALYZED : 04/30/99ANALYTICAI] DILUTION :

4 -CHI.ORO -3 -METHYLPHENOL2 -RETHYI-PHENOI.4 -METHYI. PHENOIjNAPHTELENE2 -NITROANILINE'3 -Ill.TROANI L INE4 -NITROANIIjlNENITROBENZENE2 -NITRO PHENOIj4 -NITROPHENOLN-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINEN-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINEDI -N-OCTYL PHTHALATEPENTACHljoROPHENOLPHENANTHRENEPHENOIJ4 -BROMOPHENYL - PHENYLETHER4 - CHI-OROPHENYL -PHENYLETHERN-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINEPYRENE1, 2 , 4 -TRICHLOROBENZENE2 , 4 , 6 -TRICHLOROPHENOL2 , 4 , 5 -TRICHI.OROPHENOL


TERPHENYlj-dl4NITROBENZENE -d5PHENOL-d62 -FI]UOROBI PHENYlj2 - FLUOROPHENOL2 , 4 , 6 -TRIBROMOPHENOIj

QC IjlMITS

2.00 Dry Weight

Uf3/RTfiTJ/ierfJf±Ufs/RTfiUfi/RTfiUG/KGTre/RTf3UG/KGUf3/RTfiT8ft/TfJf3

Ufs/K!f±TJf3/RTEUft/RTfiUG/KGTJft/RTf±Tuf3/RTf±

Ufs/RTf3Tyfirf[fsUG/KGUG/KGUf3/RTf±uie/RTf3Uf3/YJfsTJfi/RTf±

8270 - ?.

C.OIItJMBIA ANAI]YTICAli SERVICES

Passero Associates, PCProj eat Reference: GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Saxple ID : FOUNDRY FII.LED PIT

EXTRACTABIiE ORGENICSRETHOD 8082 PCB'SReported: 05/14/99

Date Sa]xpled : 04/21/99 Order #: 286825 Sample Hatrix: SOIL/SEDIMENDate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #: 9904000333 Percent Solid: 87.9

ANAI-YT E P QL RE SULT UNITS

I

DATE EXTRACTEDDATE ANALYZEDANAI.YTICAlj DIIjuTION :

SUREOGATE RECOVERIES QC IJIMITS

04/2:3|9904 / 2:3 I 99

1.00

DECACHLOROBIPHENYljTETRACHLORO-RETA-XYLENE

Dry Weight

Uf3/RTf3Ufi|RTf3uG/KGUie/RTfiUG/KGUG/KGuie/RTf3

8082 - 3

.

COI.tJMBIA ENAI.YTICAI] SERVICES

Iil

[j

EIj

b

bI.

Passero Associates, PCProj ect Reference : GENEVA BROWNFIELDSClient Sample ID :FOUNDRY FII.I.ED PIT

Reported: 05/14/99

Date sampled : 04/21/99 Order #: 286825 Sample llatrix: SOIII/SEI)mngNTDate Received: 04/21/99 Submission #:9904000333

ANALYTE PQL RESULTDATE ANAIIYT I CAI.

tJNIT S ANAI.YZED D II.UTION

RETELSALUMINUMNIIMONIARSENICBrmtJMBBRml]ItmCrmMluMCALCIUMcHRomt]MCOBELTCOPPERIRONLEADmGREslt)MENCRESERERCURYNICRELPOTASSIUMSEI]ENIUMSII;VIESODIUMTELIJIUM-IUM

i ' zlNC

WET CHEMISTRYPERCENT SOLIDSTOTAlj CYENIDE

87.90.500 U

tyre/y!&AVf3/RT£MG/KGurfi/RTfiMG/KGurf±/RIGurF±|yKfiurfe/RTfi

aurfi/RTJ3

INORCENIC - 1

APPENDIX 4 - DRUM INVENTORY/WASTE MANIFESTS

*\`;?:..::....I..3.i-''``

-,

EREse5grfaii..

INVENTORY OF DRIJMS AT FOUNDRY:

Cylinders:tarbonDioxide,Liquified,noniflammable(CTcrooT-3AL1800-1104484,vtr 2O# c02 6^?7, 2'xi o"•Emptyl2.'xl8"highl)ich]oroiuoromethaecAS75-71-8-small propane eyl.

4aerosolcans(need5gal.Pailtopack,mdship)

I lb. Ammoniun} chloride, granular, plastic container, % firi.`..

*l-5gal.REDowCorig8Emulsion,poly,contaius35°/osiliconefluld*1-8oz.CanofDAPGlazingCompound*14lbsDurhan'sRockHardWaterPufty

(*Non-hazndous to Syracuse)

4-5gal.Pailstar,tilecemenffloorprinier,Gliddenpaint1-7gal. Epory Piner11-lgal.Pailsofpaintclear.nanel,waupain2-1gal.Cans.flammablemixfure.appearstobepaintremover1-lpt.Caripulpleprimer:for.PVC,.flammableI -1pt. Cia Wa.terlox2-5 lb. Pails of Heat Shield1-1qt.AirBrakeconditioner,antifreezeandrustinhibito.rI-1pt.CanSolventcementwititetrakydrofurmandbutanoneI -1qt. Can Dupont with aliphatic polysocyanates and estgr.solvents

2-55gal.Drumsofresidralmc`itgooil/water

2plastic,blackcubes,iinknoihrlLwasliquidbuthashardened1-55 gallon dnm of grease] needs overpackingI-5 gal. Pal Davis Howland Oil

5 ndsc gallonjugsI -5gal. Poly bail of pink cleaner/disinfectantI-5 gal pafl of disinfectant, has 1 gallon of material

Empties:

32-5 gallon drug25-55 gal. Drum5-30 gallon drumVarious 1 gallon containersAImpty quarts of oil containers

WASTE PROFILE FtEPOF[T - SYFIACUSE FACILITY

lD

;I

:I

:I

Environmental Products & Services, lnc.532 State Fair BoillevardSyracuse, NY 13204(800) 843-8265 FAX (315) 475-8920

Envl.ronmental PToducts & Services. Ino. Approval (Print Name}

White -FACILITy Cariary -CUSTOMER

Authorized S!gnatilre

Pink -CUSTOMEB SEBVICE Goldenrocl -EPS FIEPBESENTATIVE

DO NOT DETACH COPIES OF "ls Fof]M. PLEASE SEE INS"uCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE. 2oto.EAocoJ}5o2

WAS-I E= t''r{ur[Lt= rlt=run I - a I nAuuo[ rAu.L[ I IEnvironmental Products & Services, lnc.532 State Fair BoulevardSyracuse, NY 13204(800) 843-8265 FAX {315) 475-8920

Environmental Products & Services, lnc. Approval {P"-nt Nane}

Wtiite -FAcluTY Canary -CuSTOMER

Authon.zed Signatrre

Pink -CUSTOMEFI SEF\VICE Goldenrod -EPS REPF}ESENTATIVE

I)O NOT DETACH COPIES OF "ls FORM. PLEASE SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON flEVEf}SE SIDE. colofAC"`9So2

A ID a.

GcancIVcL NV. )Llu51oI

.'

____

LAB PACKPACKING LIST

.HAZAI]D culss:_. _ n J3nA! ___i_____ _

trDREse £¥ngL€ EatD';;:don FA"£p¥¥N=

Ill i

I I ..II

11111

I I , .I I I

i 1' I I

lilli

1111

1111

TO"L WE]GiiT (1 gaJha = 8 lbsLi

?acfaged §y

A ---,- J tJ--

(,/ WASTE PROFILE REPORT - SYRACUSE FACILITYEnvironmental Products & Services, lnc.532 State Fair BoulevardSyracuse, NY 13204(800) 843-8265 FAX (315) 475-8920

I Gerierator r`hj nf` rcielzlr,viol

cLfstomeT f7}q`fjlo fl€£r)rlfl+P_i S'£ress Fr?Pmr;va'.Foundh ).C`l-fe,•..-I.----..--I.I

£drnfi+rA.+ NV I+(or\d r+tajzirav^ . Ni lLRIL<14

:d:fact n=## kD'ln7cvur! :tl:fact Th3m ae€rf±phone / rTlm 315-~ I c)cO phone /31 srl 1 93§q - 2 ,f}Lj I: Type ofplantorfacilftygenerat.ngwaste frwhyldoyk_al H)Ll ylalllJMateri.atDesen.ptionr)I.i/Ay7°/I.=\f')}17_n^JlyTfrollfJa+£A I j4 e)9 0 I)urrtth/,

•v\mstF, Nrnd-JRckA Lif]u\al, tii.ri.s. /fiiJ ` H`nler, n+pi±``2` I1 I I__ ______I I_ _-.

specificGenerat.ngprocess , jyLu.`fal mnterirl l`

lsthisdebrisorgroundwatorfromaus=CorrectweAction-per40CFR part280? _ YES ii No

volume f±jFr. Units CIOJ) Frequeney:|oneTime _Month _r/ear

List components by % (total must equal loo): Flange: Min -Max Was a TCLp analysis perfomed?_ YES L2i NO

see ziunrjial a;a SamplelDNo. nJT~i 's+ % PCB n f`nr Qi iLf`nf9f=fipcJ

•--..: I---I- p -O/o

i% •Fiashpo]nt >lso®F IDoes waste contain free lic]uids? _yES _ NO lf }es, a/a Free LJquid other(state) Nlf\

Doeswaste havesfrong odor? _YES ~ NO Describe:.

I ls thlsa RCRA Harardouswaste?_YES ± NO IsthisaDOTHazaJdeusMateriaJ?_YES }£No `

0ls this a Flegula`ed Hazardous waste ln your state? _YEs iiNo Proper shipping Name \^/n Q;+P Nch}-t&j2nNvstatewastecod©.Nr)\91DOTHazardclass\\r}tj-Hy3ZL

otherstate codes ooTldentification No. VIDnL£ls Ous generatoi a coT`ditionally exempt small quanfty generator? _ YES _ NO

Additional lr`foimatio n

Environmental Products & Sowiceg, lpe. (PrintNamo)

While -FAcluTY Canaty. CuSTOMEF}

Authorized Signature

Pink -CUSTOMEB SEFIVICE Goldenrod -EPS BEPRESEt\rIATIVE

cO NOT OET^CH CoPIES OF "ls Fo". PLEASE SEE iNs"UcTloNs oN REVERSE SIDE. 2otor:ACco.0502

./

DENERATOPe

AGE-oF- ==__|O!2+!fLEL

LAB PACKPACKING LIST

D.a.T. paopE3 s'+,IPPING NAME

.HAanD cLAss:

pACKiNG MAmLAL

UNINI ._ Y|rDtdy---- _DlsposAL FAclLny iNF6RMATION

lilli

Lil....11

1111

11 I I I

i I I I I

I::::

I ,I I I

I.11

TO"lWE]Gur(igath=8Lbs.i

`H --.

?acfased By

Apernd §y

11[111]11[11111]111111]1111111[11111111!11[11

I?8b7Lq

CESQGCITY OF GENEVA47 CASTLE ST.GEENEVP.t NY

315 789-2541 . .

8 6710 1

14465NJA 2786710

rouNDRy slTE, TACKscIN- sT.GEmuA, Iurl4456

ENvlRONMENmL pRODucrs & sERvlcEs, ENc".y D 9 8 o 7 6 1 I. 9 i..

Cysle Cnen, in.217 South First StreetElizabeth, Nee Jersey 07206

P P3 I q / fly

315 471T0503

NJD00220004.6 .. . 908.355-5800

XWASTE aEROsOI,s, FLAMMABLE, 2.i, uNi95O , DOoi

x WASTE PAINT RELATED mT`ERIAL, 3, uNi263, PGIII,D001

x WASRE PAINT RELAri±D MATERIAL, 3, uN1263, PGIII .D001

LP#l EE1058 (G7I)

ulK (I"I)lla. Code GEN#364654lib. Code I,P#.3

ulK (I"I)

llc. Code LP#4

OOIDF00005 P

OOIDM00015 G-

OOIDM00020 G

D001

cool

rml

PO #: 3367l A. N¥-i C. NEEJob #:R2147 B. NET

Emergency Phone: {315) 471 -0503 ERG#: 126,|27,127

-#jE:QDsebeu::`/ 'thj% [°f:3r:8qg...

.:„:»f:..¥Tff§670ffi.fej&8#P5.,,§u`StTjE:....--------- = --=._ I __i_ -_ -...--__-_ -.--.- = ----- =. --i -----------------, 1-

.`.:.!''£,T,-'ri= i,i= !i{==j,?:\, ,'-,I ,..,.. ' .'-i'..I ..i .:is`-I .I.,i. '.._.` :,I.=.!':. :

"ERAHsoE~HSEM 2i7souillPIRSTSTaE+iE"E", NJ. 07206(908) 355-5800

LAB EACHPACKING I.]ST

D.O.T. PBOPH SHIPPING NAME:

lJ I ,I i i

i rllllllllllllllllll- 1111111111-

iIIll

11

IILIiI-

I

_11

!!!i

II

€r-flEck=gr"an&Bae'srtytT~T==Tus=]VI(#=T8o¥L°72°6

NTAINEE3 SZ5TYPE:OF-

_I. IJIuhPACKING LIST

D.O.T. PfiopEB SHIPPING NAME:

HAIAfiD CLASS:

EPA VASTE TYPE CODE:

PACKING MATE=lAL

UN/NA:

I I!

I

I 1,,,1•ii"f`E=i I Tr= I pHyslcAL si:}rEI.II E?ACC0E I

II

1£ li at i " I. "

Ii I " I ,,------'Ei5ff.:f'f::,ff':i:.fJ=.,^'f,.,:i.f^,.I-'=.`.-.,e-i-.-,

I

I"II,I •1('

. Q'1ll,Pn+,~h^-Ji , , A I ] t'(,

?actegec: §y

Accrcved ey

€JPHEIA±±soL=~Hs§ae ffag#a:%Rj::7¥EFT LAB PACK. FACK]NGL]ST

lFEST #:

f=UM #:

NIAINER SIZErTyp E:-oF- '_

D.o.T. pBopEa SHIPPING NAME:

HAZARD CLASS:

EPA WASTE TYPE CODE:

PACKIN G MATEE3`AL:

UN/NA

DISPOSAL FACILITY INFORMATION

AFPF,OVAL CODE:

DISPOSAL CODE:

i ANTTTY I DEScalpT]ON CF MArTrmALS {HAZAaD SUBSTANCE (No trade namesl`] I c^NIAINE TYPF= I

77 J aJ~ ID®®l 1- 7=mell.+ I

=1I LRL]Zi-I I I - IIIIIIE!JIIIIIIIIIII-|IIliiiiiiiiiii=i=EE==])rur frlryiF.y~ ` fl\au,, i`'. ,

13 I en 71ln . t,btbhil-II``'1

I

Aal_J_\\OlJ ir'u

LllI

I.I1

i..I

I

I I_ 1111111111111-II rlllllllllllll-I

I'' i EE= i' I-

I

'

1!11

'

11

11

I

i`mL WE;C-HT (1 gallon I 8 ;bs.. I I

Pactesca Ey

Agcrcved E`/

'C cy€fie3£f lf§m Reeycling, T;re?t¥m!±:I::& Pisposal of Hazardous waste

217 South First Street, Elizabeth, NJ 07206 * 908-355-5800,Fax (908) 355-0562

LAND DISPOSAL RESTR:ICTION NOTIFICATION AND CERIIFICATION FORM

h„eratorAI1::;:'e:~-rirf±i:__i+==::'-:I:::I::__"``"`_`'l]::::iI-.

r)erator EPA ID #:

\p\ -i.rl.Rtio r] I 0

is land disposal restriction (LDR) notification must be subn!itted with the ihitial shipment of all.new waste•eams. Due to r€_yised. LPFZ ncltifi_ff tip_n requirfple_nts eff?givvE af!_er ATgtlst 23, 1i98, previously appr6vedisle streapis will req_uirf re~notificatiop ot! this f?rm With the first shipmerlt after that date. subsequentitification is not required unless the waste stream changes.

WASFTE STREAM INFOFZMAJION

Box A.. Check this box if tflis LDR certjfication has been supplied with a previous shipmer|t. Additionalinformation and certification is not required on this fiorm,

Box a: Indicate if waste stream is a wastewater (WW) or nan-wastewater (Nlhml) (aqueous wastestreams contain!pg f ley! total orgairl-Ic carbpn (TOC)_and < 1°yio total siispended solids (TSs) arewastewaters. AJ] other streams are nan-wastewaters).

Box C: List all EPA waste codes and subcategory reference letters (if applicable}.

Fi: strea_ms cpntaip!pg_ : 1oM: total organ-Ic carb?n (i_OC).and < 10Mo total sirspendreJ s;lids -rT:5)--;r-e

ti§e`ip#°oun%hi_P_Per_ OwW/WW-, IPA Waste Codes and subcategory reference letter (if applicable)

•.ubcategory Reference Letters (EPA codes not listed here do not have subcategories)

I DOOI A Igniteble cliatac±eristic wastes, ex;gge|)i higfl TOG igr\itable litiu.tds subcategorvDO01 a l]igh TOC {> 10%} ignitable liquid subcategory -.D003 J4 Reactive sulfide subcategorr___ ___ _._____ _ _ __ -`,

I

8 Reactive nidesul]cateo .:.. . . . ` ----`,DOCS C. Water reactive subcategory .

' D003 0 Otlierreactivesubcategorv . . . . - ` . . .iD006 J4 CadmiutTi noti-batteTv subcategorv -,I)006 G Cadmium containing batteries subcategorv ' - ----

1. D008 AILeadnori-batterysubcategory.-i

1. DOO8 G Lead acid batteries subcategory --`,DOO9 A I - ..- .---.. ,,.. .-- _ __ _EiiEiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiEiEiiiiiiED009 8 High mercury iriorganic subcategory fe 260 PPM Total Mercury) ----DOO9 C

'LowmercusL]bcatea<260PPMTotalMercu-:--~i,

DOO9 D MercL]ry wastewater stibcategci rv

rmrrE .TSDF copy YELLOW -CuSTOMEF` CO PY

SPENT sol:RENT wAsrE cONSTITUENTs .. .

C.i_£:_a,p^p!i.ca.bÎ.e.waste code(s} and constituent(s) for each manifest line item containing EPA spent Solvent wastecodes Fool-F005.

ABCD_FOO 1 ABCD_F002 ABCD_F003

ABCDABCD_

-aa=tor'e•berizene-A-butyl alcohol-iso-brty] alcx]holcarbori diisulFide•.carbon tetrachlo ride-ch[arobenz:etie.rn-oJ•O-ol•p-cesoI•en3sylic acid-eyc]ohennone®rdicJi[orobenzene-thyl acRtate<tlhyl benzene

AE)CD_

ABCD__ _F004

•thyl ether-tT]ethar]ol

ABCDABCD_ABCDABcOABCD_ABCD

ABCD _ F005

-mefhy[elie cfi]o ride-rT]ethy] ethyl ketone-meftyl isobutyl ketone .-nitTobenzetae•pyridine-tetracfiloroethy[ene•toluene•1,I,I,-trichloroethane•±,1,2-tTichloroethane-trichlorcietf.ylene-tTichlororrlchofluororTzetharle-1,1,2-trfchloro-1,2,2,-trifluoroErfuane-ryler,es

uNDERi:ITNG HAZARDOus cONs:rlTiiENTs

F,O^r:3::=.ctLer!Pff^19y__A.affr.dôu^S..Wa.9ê,.f*a.TS. {ERA codes Fool-D043), _ please list all tJnder]ying hazardouscOT%P=_3f:.d.i_fi::d^g.4.O._CF5,2_6_8^(.2)_{i_).Fat5r§_presep{at_cpncentr;iti:;;-Ofc;:i.I;i-dr;-ir;i-;;fa;.g:g;#:n-i¥n]!â£^s^li,sthe!.i:!2_c.FF_2^68..!8(I.oò±:Fdro.5confpt4en.5idEptifjedins:dr;;(£f-ir;i-;feifrc-=;;±±:t;i;i-f:;CE;ifAcodes D004-D043 listed in Slection (1) do IIot need to be listed in this s:ir;:i:).

ERE•t

_None Present_None Present_Norie Present_None Present

HOW MUST THESE WASTE STREAMS BE MANAGED?

For each manifest line item, circle applicable treatmertyrequirement. Fcir contain.Inated soil, circle applicable choice as indicated.

A2%C7D7ST3!:.j=.n.°faEnnÊPLA_9.3^r.I_O!.S_r3_StLP_Lap_di?.notregrct.ed.freml.3ndqispos?lunder40CFR268subpartD.-_ _- _ ----- _ ----- I--|| \,®

P.is_3_a_P_..E_PAL_h_aL33!d_Pu_:_apste.th?t.is.po.ta.fopp_minatedsoilorha±ardous-dibri;.-w5-Si;-irJ;±ri;:ì:atedtotheaffp.P.P_ri_aFetr_cafmen!5tq.ndar?.setfipapin40CFRsubpartD.piiortolanddispo;al.A,B.f9. T9i5 i? a h.azardpus debri.s and is sTbif ect to tfie altern;tive tr;atment standa-r5:-drF`4o CFR 268.45.APCQ. Tf i!ls±5ja__!3Z3_rg?uS Wa.Sip con.f eminateq 5_g4.P]..!s cor[faminated soil does/d-i=-a.;tiEwiie-S&.i;tain listed•.. h.a.3:dô=.,r.st.5.aLn?ttan£{P_e3_:?i_t_= T grhipit? charact€p5ti.c. oi _h?zarirfe waste a;i. ;-;:.iri;if e

• . t±_ojp_§pes with ¢dJcle onei the sc|.|| treatment innJi;Js-i;-iidriiiii-dr; iiii.-ii(-i);)-a;dr:;;i';eEJ-ge'asgent. -_ _ J_ __, _Standards...---`-`-`-------...-'--'----.''.-I..

T#cjsufchE?fnhâ+Za.rfh#LS:+:,a=.e._th:.i.2e.:5__all_:P.PI!Ea.!!etr_3?tment*nd.apssftfo_fgin40CFR268subpartD.

r:Pfw=a_#.!S..%Lt£:3P!b_;t.e!P!.!aLn1_d_iFp_psal..I.Fer9fyund.:rpena!ky-iFlivi_ii={-:ii;iiEi].;afii-;:::a%fiun':dw:nda,rna:3;fiT!§?^r.W!P..ththe^xpff.a_th_r_a_u_g,I_5?3.!LiLsiLS._an.dtaprig.or.thai.rou.gh.kno_jl;I_i;6-fii;;viar£;i;;-i:i;fr'disC3enra:#5P#ri.SâLt,Lth*f^y_a5f_eLf_OHPI,i_es,^wi.th..th.e,Fe.a.tine-n_t_Sn_dar.Ssp_e9fi€?_-i-fr¢EFRFR-i:i-2ii8-Siurbrfiri;-anda|ia.PI!i_3gI_e.T?PP!itio_n_Eset.forth.in40FFR2_68.32arRCRAsection.3664iJ):iiEli-i;;ii;i:dr{i-nio'rr%;6o-na|S,uEb#rae:-:S^T:,I..a,%~u=Lt:::I.fL3#Plft{e_.I_aft_a_y?!eapatthere.a-ri`~-si;;i'fiis-n{-iisl-drfi;r-iJ'i;;i'fJ;;`:`false.certification, including the possibilky of a fine and imprisonment.

HL

cERTFlcrmoN•#aatallinformationonthisandallassociateddocumentsiscompleteandaccuratetothebestofmyrJ7e.

l`E

RERE[I

?.±A

I ` + + +=1~. . ,r`t

A

±I

1CI

i -iE E

ii-..---

II

EI

E

I

EEEird L,,

iDBiEEPE.p

^,.J`-

E=I

&[=1

.9D' `rd- a

L=T

i.!`D|{B

Eo

7

titEE=

EaE

I

C0E]EE]E]NE]EiEEEE

E=ZinE=Ei]EE

----I-

IIaca

aE.a,B£LL.

E=E=LLJLLE]aDaEEEEE]i

1,

EDIE

EElmEE]E]raRIERIEE]EEmE]

-._,--.*¥_```D.'.-~'`

_.-¥:`l.I__=

i|[iEBiBEiiEEiEiEREELiEEEEDEu

REDID

-E

||lds96-]!EBEIDE0EaoEE

BD`L`IDE]p,t€J-`rtlvf.

E|-

RIEEEEEEIi]EliEE]illEHEi]EIENillHDE]mE]EH

Nol9.a.iax]

9e-BD

o0B=0

I

+`t.

1,i!,*t€:0.Hay-.D¥.¥

•.rfi¥?try.-TmaBfJ;'pe

-

oD

t,Pi`i.

+++

t`3,.

}r."

00_

I-,i

•u

APPENDK 5 - SOIL BORING LOGS

i-.-...,,.PASSERO ASSOCIARES, P.C.

.. ALRo:HL[{|::TTvsjoELNEGrvNA:ERS-;oUc::s[T::.:.:. TEST ,BORING.F3EPORT• ...I... .i.

716-32S-1000 14604 \,+,

PROJECT G\ . Fob&hJriL HfyNf. NO.. Bti I

CuENT C. 6' a;enQul£-,` F=q7-I(clCONTRACTOR Amjir,`c4^ AttaJJr

SHEE:T NO:

CROUNDWATER DEPTH ToU CASINO SAMPLER COREBARRELLOCATION:

DATE llME WATER CASING HOLE TYPE El£VATION:

SIZE ID DATE START: 2-/7` i`iofilLLER:/Sd

HAMMER WT.

HAMMER FALL iNsPECTOR:Ad '.SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WATER LEVELS. .S..

i*a A C BIOus dN SAMPLER SAMPLE aSOIL AND ROCK INFORMAmoN0" 6„ % 12„18n 18"24

"N REC. NO. DEPTH REMARKS

Ia /2, + /'4

S j/

''8

PIP',?a,6aa

'torf i /Cpe/ c ;4ivrD / a:A

't4'` `- I + 8~

c"•-==------i--:--.i_-___:-.--==

'qc/ i 7

7 + S'.Iwet hal 5frt-L,I ;cfty

uJr ~sif Lfty 5It:I ./ ir 4,s2:rf:+c>tLT:/irrfq,Sif.Lzzkv`.5ILi-(I

I8, Jt 71 ` lS',

I8 ''0 i /?'/ I,

(Or '2.` 3. 1 ' Z- ha sic.,~y frcftyif air plqsL± CLA-y'il 1 L ( i!t •Qar:,; CL.A^Y :/ Sut€ s_.I/i/ /cr'`a,h54ND.-v+rFsrd,rfe , fired

N = NO.C-NO.

1111111'- I

OF BLOWS TO DRIVI ~ SPOON ~V«" _ 18. WT. EA. BLC)WoF BLows To DR]vE _ cAsiNG_ wTh~ LB. wr.~ EA. Blow

PASSER0 ASSOCIATES, P.c. ~:i.ARCHI TECTS-ENGINEERS-SURVEYtlRS ...

...¥ .. r±.:i..±t==. loo L[E€RTY POLE WAy RHCHESTERN.Y, i `716-32S-1000 14604 .....

PROJE:CT Ger"a i=k^JrqJ rc_J±_I_a:B#2-cL}ENT c.ih_ o{ Gereui. "E N_O.. qtllq

CONIRACTOR. Arhgrf.Lca^ Atoq€/ SHEET NO:

GROuNDWATER DEPTH rd CASING SAMPLER COREBARFiEL LOCATION:

OAlt "ME WATE:R CASING HOLE TYPE ELEVATION:

A. SIZE 'D DA:Its;ITNRI..2:iq4r

HAMMER WT. DRILLER:fuff

HAMMER FALL NspECTOR:inorran

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANCES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WATER LEVELS.

D€/0 f4CBLOus ON SAMPLER SAMPLE SOIL AND ROCK INFORMAlloN

01. 6.' 6"12 12"18" 18"24n RE:MARKSN REC. NO' DEPTH

(a (TZ, i1¢ '0

(L``

e{D00rJL\C,C'0 rr\ru..it pech c 5-ANI`T F:I-I(u€+c..Sdr4FIl{I-/.±r: f rf tL4

(T> 4i` i ( i (c" 1-I•c;.',-.-:,::;::;-':,.',,.-:,:,:i:;:::i cj!£/

q` '' r \-C^. 6 16'-`

f'- y` .3 I +','cl S,"t+ 7r*ued f;`` , ch .a 7`

s.f,+ +ap sj:cr L/ +r ff.:qu/

I9'lot

i) i •./L`'0 11„

s4+. I-cjfurtthr,'41hc:e,T;sifI,"+5£gT a;/ +r Ftc~J,cf l@>`#/CCLL:./,iv/.,,,+/`cCLA`i,i.`lA.gie/-rf.

''0(7,I

-iI

I

\ I

'12,

'y' 2. 2_ L 2_I

Lit i.ii` 5A~J? {'.j j3.S-'

N = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE SPOON WITH LB. WT. EA. BLOW

C = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE CASING WTH LB. WT. EA. BLOW,.`

'`....--.........-'---..`..,-..`.--...--`.,.........:....--.-..'...-.-......-.......--'

PASSERO ASSOCIATES, P.C....- ARCHITECTS-ENGINE:ERS-SuRVEYHRS

•E HE loo LIBERTY POLE RAY RDCHESTER,N.Y. I '

716-32S-1000 14604 \,,.

P¥_GfeL±eut F:oL¢.JrcLr HOLENO: /f3

CuENT Aimfa, C.i §{ .G3ae'un, FHI NO.. q+IllCONTRACTOR A wè^ ,-c,4^ Atlth SHEET NO:

CROUNDWATERVDEPTHTO

CASING SAMPLER COREBARF{EL LOCA"ON:

DATE T'ME WATER CASING HC)LE TYPE ELEVATION:

SIZE 'D DATE START: i-}7-?;DRiLLER:capeyN_sp_rloR..horha.HAMMER WT.

HAMMER FALL

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WA|ER LEVELs. a `

rtya tlC BLOus ON SAMPLER SAMPLESOIL AND ROCK INFORMAThoN

0" 6" 6"12 12"18" 18„24"N REC. NO. OEplli REMARKS

I,,,

o` z,À1I `4

PLOC'S\ +i--.`cLJ:'-f---x.----'-i:,,*jE-,-.-*-...i-I.#i`'Leul-i.gA~iD/Itch;drb-un,+

I? i'€pl,i.r,,'4

tJi, +a^ S±L.I W/ i^ fry

Jf a+ wl 4`V+Arfu-5ccT 4I41

(I la" u-;:;,ts6;\:[#=,th,try't'tfty

ir h f^"a, c;Ilmo;'t-f¢try,-s±LJ-

IC-drex.` \„

) i,i'û.r-t]€F SFL;T L,/ T4+ c:LAY

'rf et .i-LLT t,/ fir xp dL .-{,\-_..,I7` 'L' .''

74 ]òit+ h s±4r fu/ 5qu CJZ7cez~,

•.

. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE _SPOON ~WTH ~ LB. WT. EA. BLOWC = NO. OF BLOWS T0 DRIVE CASING_ VATH~ LB. VI. EA. BLOW

PASSER0 ASSOCIATES, P.C.:,..., ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS

•..;.. ,i-..i.'`:.loo LIBERTY POLE WAY RI]CHESTER,N.Y. ` '716-32S~1000 14604 . ...

PP!PUR!f :I Ge^{|,a Fowiwlru~ i+tyre NO.. B_H 1

a-c±=b___a_f_Gen:jq^ FILE NO: ¥7//7

CONTRACTOR -'AOvr,`c,a^ he.£r SHEETNO: /

GROUNDWATER DEPTH Tor CASING SAMPLER COREBARREL LOCATION:

DAFT llME WATER CASING HOLE TYPE ELEVATION:

SIZE 'D /„ DATE START:2`Z-} -?7

HAMMER WT. DRILLER: Ges¢o

HAMMER FALL iNsPECTOR: £nfc?f

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WATER LEVELS.

DLe70 H BLOus ON SAMPLER SAMPLESOIL AND ROCK INFORMATION

0"€" 6"12 12"18" 18"24"0 C N REC. NO. DEPTH c®uutal~,O~thLL+LREMARKs ,i..,,j4

/a /.3 I',/

PfD''\lDNr)A/'0NO •, a I--3' €{'[ -#r f.£A"ediitts'+

I:,:I+l±:#5irs+,-ct+:;f8hE.f,`,:#u,7,'3,-a.'€`\-S`.!`.

'i> c, I,i32.

'' (q~1t,

d.a./+f8;:Si5G -G `1.5..-`?'.Irpfis.o`=f#i;,i,*¥,.iL,,jc;C6

'7/z,I 3/

Gray.BT.6.I)¢C)47{pIfgri.dr4tymf+dtrr;;r;iL/S':#hahackcdy,

'L,. /+-/

N = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE SPOON Wl" LB. WT. EA. BLOWC=NO.OFBLOWST0DRIVECASINGW]THLB.VIT.EA.BLOW

Ill-

PASSERO ASSOCIATES, P.C.ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-SURVEYdRS

.T-. .:,.-::I:-<.- 100 LIBERTY POLE WAY RDCHESTER,N.Y. ! `716-325-1000 14604 i,-.

pRojECT G G~ HOLE NO: 8#. r

cLiENT C,{L 4 .' FILE NO:

CONTRACTOR. u .. . Z=f===T6F;{i( SHEET NO:

CROUNDWATER DEPTH TO CASING SAMPLER COREBARREL LOCATION:

DATE llME WATER CASING HOLE TYPE EuVATION:

SIZE ID DATE START: 3-z5irfj

HAMMER WT. -`a /6. DRILLER:

HAMMER FALL / g,'' •lNSPECTOR:


f2ap h BL0us ON SAMPLEF3 SAMPLESOIL AND ROCK INF-ORMATION

0. 6" 6"12 12„18„ 18„24"0 C N REC. NO. DEPTH

REMARKS

0 i i t( + C|

"b.,]F €14c(C .9lr;ue I clck.4?.d|

L/{r

L1

t Li L

•!H`twon+-hat 5r,LT L/ .I.rrtyG¢`han¢u 5±LT g i(I

1 IL( 6

q Gl

dry.ha S-ttT-. Iw/ 5.fry c£4dey,,¢dr.hat5:+LTfoi..`,;

(`8

C C

i \T p.iuLEL ed cutv vi sol+ 5;/I

9/ (bi J,

Y, |Dty`°.i`+ .hn CLA7' iv` ffro? )|jl,I

sfor .h ffLrc`j `7-`~`

19 '51 1

iLSout h ii.{{ sdrha *5^)/rs © lay.(+

N = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE SPOON WTH LB. WT. EA. BLOw

c = NO. OF BLOws TO DRivE cAslNG VATH LB. rm. EA. BLow

-

I

PASSERO ASSOCIATES, P.C,iARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-SURVEYER§.:

¥.-..=r.T=±;I...100 L[BE:RTY POLE: WAY RDCHESTER,N.Y. I `

716-325-1000 14604 ....

pRojECT Geh€t,fL riwLhrfi'4 HOLE NO= BH a

CUENT Ci`Lr of fi€he;` F„| Ncy:. ci +il ?

CONTRACTOR -Atngrr+qn Au4.er SHEET NO:

GROUNDWATER DEPTH ToV CASING SAMPLER CC)REBARREL LOCATION:

DATE 1lME WATER CASING tloLE TYPE ELEVATtoN:

SIZE ID DATE s.TART: 2.~2r-9f

HAMMER rm. DRiLLER: fro

HAMMER FALL INs_REIorti.indrb*`

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WATEFt LEVELS.

0 C

BLOus ON SAMPLER SAMPLE SOIL AND ROCK INFORMATloN0" 6" 6"12 12"18" 18"24"

N REC. NO. DEPTH REMARKS

a. 1.I '0 +cir`

I

/`AprD0`'¢C)0 dy y+c- swh- ruul PJflSap-----i---i----:::+-_--;i--tcLfr`(..,Theq`/r\o,sirin`TO```'ThsAWD

?' i' r ++ r 11`"

=i 6'`'\ +

€ i,1'1i.

6 6`+ +

L\ gr

i\\

£ /W i y4/ ?

'd.' /.a/' (

I I

9alair# h4^ h 5;4^zD.c5rfu.

I.tf 7.'€ i

/L /3

N = NO. OF BLOWS T0 DRIVE SPOON _"" L8. WT. EA. BLOwc = NO. OF BLOws TO DRlvE cAsiNG~ "TH LB. in. EA. BLow

`,,

I

I

I

I

I

I

PASSER0 ASSOCIATES, P.:C.ARCHITECTS-ENGINE:ERS-SURVEYORS

•.¥!. RE loo LIBERTy paLE VAT RHCHESTER,ivy. i `

716-325-1000 . i4604

pRojECT Ge,`eur4 fathde H=O--B#ScLiENT c,. rf G8fytgiA FILE NO:

coNiRACTOR ', 4th SHEET NO:

GROUNDWATER DEPTH TO ' CASING SAMPLER COREBARREL LOCATION:

DATE T'ME WATER CASING HOLE TYPE ELEVATION:

SIZE ID DATE START:2-2.q-?7

HAMME:R VI. DRILl£R: AcZ#

HAMMER FALL iNspECTOR: ri 4 ,Jfro


0 C

BLovrs oN SAMPLER SAMPLESOIL AND ROCK INFORMA"ON

0" 6„ 6"12 '2"18" 18„24"N REC. NO. DEPTH REMARKS

0 ? zj,¢+~ rfi" Jng c a,tryrf +rty dy/alft] ha 5Su~ v/ ffL cfty

? a Th« ed-c;,ut Lfu 5T:LT-L/ facf ay+

':

N = NO. OF BLOWS T0 DRIVE SPOON "" LB. WT. EA. BLOW

c = NO. OF BLoms TO DRivE cAsiNc "" LB. wT. EA, Blow

I

i

lD

!E

!H

:I

•-. - . . .PASSERO ASsbcIATES, P.C.

•:?. ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS-suRVEynRs

•..•..;-.- ::.a:+;s--:. •,3looLIBERTYPCILEWAYRDCHESTER,N.Y.'`

716-32S-1000 14604 •,,-

PROJECT Ce4t&rfi Fdrp4t~ HOuEro..8ir;0c± ck ol 6,#= FVN£NO:.??/[3

CONTRACTOR/ " ' fu94 SHEET NO:

CROUNDWATER DEPTH TO CASING SAMPLEf3 COREBARRE:L LOCATION:

DATE |lME WATER CASING HOLE TYPE ELEVATION:

SIZE ID DATE START:2~2i'-?7

HAMMER WT. DRl||ER:

HAMMER FALL lNSPECTOR:

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTE:R OBSERVED WAITR LEVELS.

0 C

BLOve ON SAMPLER SAMPLESOIL AND ROCK INF-ORMATION

0" 6" 6"12 12"18" 18„24"N REC. NO. OEP" REMARKS

0 5 #^ rx`..Lced\sul/%fty;-p;z/,ndh5Ah;D

/nd_ue+`ha c>`ELr L,/ .I,lfro*fry,3 G

N = NO. OF BLOWS T0 DRIVE SPOON "TH L8. WT. EA. BLOW

C = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE CASING "TH LB. VIT. EA. BLOW

TEST ,BOPllNG PIEPOPIT-,

N_0..S#tlCUENT cr 3 f Gwi FILE NO:

CONTRACTOR SHEET NO:

CROUNDWATER DEP" TO CASING SAMPLER LOCATION:

WATER CASING EusvATION:

DATE START:

HAMMER VIT. DRILLER:

HAMMER FALL lNSPECTOR:

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WATER LEVELS.

BLOus ON SAMPLER. SAMPLE

DEPTH

SOIL AND ROCK INFORMA"ONREMAF{KS

c drb `AM. a;il,:. thutT+ +qu

sT:l.I u| 3ifvae fa),

no=,if-Litif tTh SCLr y+`5Jue

frys`bct,I

i-r`. lah i¢`1,-A",, G £ S`',-/

N = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE

C = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE

SPOON

CASING

LB. WT.

LB. VI.

EA. BLOW

EA. BLOW

PASSER0 ASSOCIATES, P.C.ARCHITE:CTS-ENGINE:ERS-SURVEYHRS

loo LIBERTY pale VAT RflcHESTER,N.y. { '7i6-3e5-iooo i4604 ..~

PROJECT Ge nL€v4 riuhchrqu Hou£ NO.. Bit 12`

CUENT c`'h a+ Qihetr^ FILE NO:

CONTRACTOR ` AMq,~ MalJEL SHEET NO:

CROUNDWAIERVDEPTHTO

CASING SAMPLER COREBARREL LOCAlloN:

DATE TIME WATER CASING HOLE TYPE €LEVATloN:

SIZE ID DATE START: +-2Hk/~??

HAMMER VI. ORiLiER: ,3gr

HAMMER FALL NspECTOR:in¢.,a

SEASONAL AND CLIMA"C CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WA"R LEVELS.

0 C

BLOWS ON SAMPLER SAMPLE SOIL AND ROCK INFORMATIONREMARKSa"6" 6"12 12"18" 18„24"

N REC. NO. DEPTH

-i;?`/

i_6" u,Orof qL\ha 4ngfu{

try j s ; I+,, s Ouv; 4.,.i\ w,f 4,,,.c,c-

•ha-G£4# i,.'\ .,,/M, ,/5 /85 ,. I +/ cl7i`,

i,,

/ /

N = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE SPOON "TH LB. WT. EA. BLOW

C = NO. OF BLOWS TO DRIVE CASING WITH LB. TIT. EA. BLOW

`-......-.-.-PASSERO 4SSOCIARES, P.C.AecHITECTs-EN6rNEERs-suRVEyt]Rs

.=.. ri..=J:==-,i100L[B€RTYPOLEWAYRl]CHESTER,NLY.i'

716-32S-1000 14604 \.+``

PROJECT rvou£ NIO.- -S it 1` 1

CLIENT FILE NO:

CONTRACTOR SHEET NO:

CROUNt}WATER DEPTH TO CASING SAMPLER COREBARRELLOCATION:

DATE TIME: WATER CASING HOLE TYPE ELEVATION:

SIZE ID DATE Sl.ART: 2.-2y

HAMMER WT. DRILIER:

HAMMEF3 FALL lNSPECToft:

SEASONAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGES MAY ALTER OBSERVED WATER LEVELS,

0 C

8LOus ON SAMPLER SAMPLESOIL AND ROCK INFOF3MATloN

0" 6" 6"12 % 18"24"N REC. NO. DEPTH REMARKS

0 ? ¢A

/

c"L41£+idr +r4ul , ~Jl c&r,

7 f

N = NO. OF BLOws TO DRivE SPOON unTH LB. wT. EA. glow

C = No. oF BLowS TO DRIVE cAsiNG~ WTH LB. wr. EA. Blow

++6_Tq N rd tr4f lrf u* Grf u

b t t , `-__-0-TS i-" fltwfty , J3 fo_+

s-+L:I tl/ fa cft7~

froT5t-Lrof ha 53=LT-L,/

+r fry

£±iEji

a

C,

BET/6 - twh 5 grck ed fiuned flwdrrty .Lfro nLdof fo city

c!-i th.Ojj+~ wf+ ha 5£Lr ©

i)-f

cn c,sdy/edavrL,;dri 5~r+I: t'/ h- f ty

c s.A"D f:-((

wls+ F ir v.i tv\ fry

a

c,

0

th\ ,

trLG-ql `-__-¢lL[ (i11-Jot _2/ f" rfLL, +dy peal #

`\~{/ Jf iThn# 5IJ'Lf /ir Cf ty

AppENDlx 6 - in7nLL coNSTRucTloNDIAG-

'

iI

i

:i

i

i1

i

APPENDIX 7 - RESDENTIAL SAMPLES

Colund]ia Analytical Services, Inc.INORGANIC CLP

-1-INORGANIC ENAI.YSIS DATA SHEET

LID TAcksow ST

SAREIE ro.

9810000391

Case No. :

atrix {soil/water} : SOIL/SEDI

evel (low/I[ied} : LOW

Solids: 79.9

SAS NO. :

Lab Saxple ID:

SDG NO.: 40dACK

250189

Date Received: 10/27/98

Concentration Units (ug/I- or mg/kg dry weig.ht) : MG/KG

Cas No. Analyte t6Lcentration

|7429-90-5 lAluminun I 817ol I

lBIN Ipl7440-36-0 [Antimony I 3.4

I 7440-38-2 I Arsenic I 23.21 lN

|7440-39-3 lBarium I 3411 I NIpl

o.7olBl lpl|7440-41-7 lBerylliuzn I]7440-43-9 lcachlum I 2.211

7440-70-2 lcalciun I 841ol 1* I

|7440-47-3 lchromirm I 24.211"

|7440-48-4 ICobal± I' 11.7181

|7440-50-8 ICopper I 15411

|7439-89-6 llron 272oo I

|7439-92-1. lLead I|7439-95-4. IMagnesiun I|7439-96-5 lManganese I s78l I

|7439-97-6 IMelcury I 1.31 lN

|7440-02-0 INic*el I 19.ill

17440-09-7 I Potassium I 127ol I I

|7782-49-2 Iselenium I i.2lEl lF

|7440-22-4 . I silver I 4.11 lE

|7440-23-5 lsodlun I 38.9lul lpl

|7440~28~0 lthallium I 6.311 lpI

|7440-62-2 |Vanadlum I 21.61 I

7440-66-6 I zinc I 7231 I

Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: .

Color After : YELLOW Clarity After : CIEAR

Co-nts:

Tex ture RED ItJM

artifacts:

Form I -IN ]{YS ASP 12/9

Colulnl}la And.I:yllcal Services, in.c.

Contract: 9810000391

Lab Code:

INORCENIC CLP-1-

INORGANIC ENAIJYSIS DATA SHEET

Case No. :

Matrix (soil/water} : SOIL/SEDI .

I.evel {lott/med} : I,oW

Sag NO. i

I.ab Saxple ID:

. 31 J14ckso" STszueLE HO.

SDG tSO.: 40dACK

250190


a Solids: 85.7

Concentration Units (ug/I- or mg/kg clay weight) : MG/KG

CIAS No, chalyte Gancentration

7429-90-5 lAlndnun I 941ol INIpl

NIpl7440-36-0 Iintimony I 2.5181

7440-38-2 I Arsenic I 21.511

7440-39-3 I Bariun I 2951 lN

I Berylliun II 7440-41-7 o.77181

Icadriun II 7440-43-9 2.311*lpl7440-70-2 I calcium I 112ool I

7440-47-3 lch=orium I 26.71 l*N

1o.21817440-48-4 I cobalt I7440-50-8 I c:opper I loll I7439-89-6 I IJ=on 264oo I

I 7439-92-1 I I.ead I7439-95-4 I Magrnesiun I

I Manganese II 7439-96-5 74ol I

lMercury II 7439-97-6 o-25l lN

I 7440-02-0 I Nic=kel I 22.'71.I

117440-09-7 I potassium I1.311 I

lE1

7782-49-2 Iselenim II 7440~22-4 I silvez' I 1.2 I a

37.7 Iu I7440~23-5 I sodium I

I 7440-28-0 linalliun I 8.91 I

I 7440-62-2 lvanacHun I 27.ol I

I 7440-66-6 I zinc I 62811

Te]{ tule NED Itn6

irtif acts :Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: ,

Color After : YEI,I.OH Clarity After: CIEAR

Comments :

roam I - IN Nrs Asp 12/!

•olumDltl Antll.ylicai servLces, L[.c.

Contract: 9810000391

I.ab Code:

INORCENIC CI.P-1-

IHORGANlc ENAI.ysls DATA sHEEr

C:ase No. :

(soil/tfater) : SOIL/SEDI .

{low/ned) : LOW

% Solids: 77.a

SAS NO, :

Lab Saxple ID:

`T8' £`XC#Aw6£ sTsrmlE NO.

SDG NO.: 40dACK

250191


Concentration Units (ug/L or mg'/kg dry weigrht) : MG/KG

CAS No. chalyte G;oneentration

7429~90-5 lAlndziun I 1o4ool I

7440-36-a lchtinony I 1.418 I NNIpl7440-38-2 I Arsenic 25.31 I

7440-39-3 I Bariun I 5o6l I

7440-41-7 I Berylliun I a.75181

7440-43-9 I Cadriun 2.31 I

7440-70-2 lcalciun I 162ool I

I chroriunI 7440-47-3 39.211*

7440-48-4 I cobalt I 9.4181

9721 lN I7440-50-8 I copper II 7439-89-6 I Iron I 195ool I

74711 . II I,eadI 7439-92-17439-95-4 I Hagnesiun I 1*1

I 7439-96-S I Hang.anese I 46711

7439-97-6 I Mercury I o-72l lN

I Nickel I17440-02-0 19.21 1

( 7440-09-7 I Potassium I 116o 18 I

7782-49-2 lseleniun I 1.31 I

EIpl7440-22-4 I silver I 2.3181

I 7440-23-5 I sodium I 824181

7440-28-a lthalliun I 8.71 I

7440-62-2 lvanadiun I 22.711

7440-66-6 I zinc I 66811

Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: .

Color After : ¥ELI,OW Clarity After : CIEAR

Cormen±s :

Tex tu re lflD IUM

Artifacts=

Fort.` I -IN N¥S ASP 12/

Colul.nbia Ana[ytlcal Services, 1nc.

lD:=Contlac€: 9810000391

Cocle :

INORenlc cLp-1-

INORGANIC ANAI;YSIS DATA SHEET

Case No. :

Matrix {soil/water) : Soil/SEDI .

Level (low/ned) :

% Solids: 85.6

LOW

S-AS No. :

I.ab Saxple ID:

i3i t`xcif44i6f 3. rsArmLE HO.

SDG NO.: 40|ACK

250192

I)ate Received: 10/27/98

Concentration Units tug/I. or ng/kg dry weig.h€) : MG/KG

GAS No. inalyte CC)ncentration

7429-90-5 I Alurinun .I 932ol I

NIpl

NIPI7440-36-a Ichtimony I 4.o 181

7440-38-2 I Ars.enic I 22.all

7440-39-3 I Bariun I 3411 lN

I Berylliun II 7440-41-7 o.6918 I

I cadiun II 7440-43-9 2.311

7440-70-2 I calcium I 134ool I

I 7440-47-3 lchroriun I 3o.1l l*N

I 7440-48-4 I cobalt I 8.8181

7440-50-8 I copper I 234o I

I 7439-89-6 I Izon I 23600I Lead II 7439-92-1

I 7439-95-4 I Magnesium I

I 7439-96-5 I Manganese 8321 I

I Mercury II 7439-97-6 o.33l lN

7440-02-0 I Nickel I 21.ill

7440-09-7 I potassium I 152ol I

7782-49-2 lseleniun I o.97181

EIplI 7440-22-4 I silver I 2.o 18 I

7440-23-5 I Socfiun I 37.a lu I

|7440-28-0 I.Thallium 6.711

7440-62-2 lvanadiun I 2o.3l I

7440-66-6 I zinc I 78611

Color Before: BRorqN Clarity Before: .

Color After : FELLOW Clarity After : CIEAR

Comments :

Tex tu =e MED I UH

Altifacts :

Fom I - IN N¥s asp 12/

•ui.itrliui,u I+Iiueyucu. -c:I v.Leo, i.ILc.INORCENIC CLP

-1-INORGANIC ENAI;YSIS DATA SHEET

sanlE No.

Contract: 9810000391•::i:Code i

[I::v::x

IIII

Case lto. :

(soil/water) : SOIL/SEDI .

(low/med} : Low

8 Solids: 85.8

Sas No. : SDG NO. : 40dACK

I.ab Saxple ID: 250193


Cc}ncentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

Cue No. inalyte Concentration

|7429-90-5 lAlutnun I 10500| I I P I|7440-36-a Iintinony I 1.8[B|N I P I|7440-38-2 lAIsenic I 16.9| |N I P I|7440-39-3 lBarium I 330| |N I P I|7440-41-7 lBerylliun I 0.77|8| I I I|7440-43-9 Icadmiun I 2.3| I |P||7440-70-2 lcalciun I 5370! |* |P||7440-47-3 lchroriun I 25.7| |*N I|7440-48-4 lcobal€ I 10.1|8 II 7440-50-8 I Copper I 104 I|7439-89-6 llron I 21900|7439-92-1 I I,ead I 668|7439-95-4 lMagrnesiurn I 3230|7439-96-5 lManganese I 709 I[7439-97-6 lMercury I 0.25| |N|7440-02-0 `lNickel I 21.8| I[7440-09-7 IPo€assiun I 2180| I I|7782-49-2 Iseleniun I 1.2| I I F|7440-22-4 lsilver I 1.2|B|E I P I|7440~23-5 lsodiurL I 37.3|U| I P I|7440-28-0 IThalliurL I 6.5| I I P I|7440-62-2 lvanadiurn I 23.9! I I P I|7440-66-6 lzinc I 663| I |P I

Color Befc}re: BROWN Clarity Before:

Color After: YEliLOW Clarity After : CIEAR

Co-nts :

Tex tu =e lflD IUM

Artif acts :

Fo]mi I - IH IIlrs ZISP 12/9.- .`-i

Geneva Foundrv Residential Gardens

GPInorganic drlyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 324Aluninun 9730arsenic 58.9Bariun 91.4Calcium 30600Chromium 15.5COpper 34.7 .Iron 15500Magnesium 10800Manganese 370Mercury 0.47Nickel 14.9Potassium 2190Vanadium 23.4Zinc 148

BAljLPARKInorganic Analyte Concentrati on MGAIG

LEAD 66.4Aluminum 6850Arsenic 2.3Barium 62.6Calcium 5800Chromium 9.0COpper 19.2Iron 11200Magnesium 2770Manganese 303Meroury 0.18Nickel 9.7Pofassiun 1340Vanadium 16.3Zinc 76.9

G:\Opendoc\1997V}7119UcraftData\GFgardens.doc


CrmcHInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 287Aluminun 10000arsenic 48.5Balun 91.8Calofun 16300Chromium 14.5COpper 21.0Iron 16500Magnesium 6850Manganese 394Mercury 0.13Nickel 16,5Pofassiun 1710Vanadium 23.9Zinc 116

34JACRThorganic Analyte Co ncentration MG/KG

LEAD 425Aluninum 11500Arsenic 26.9Bariun 146Calcium 4760Chromium 21.9Copper 46.4hon 21200Magnesium 3420Manganese 484Mercury 0.14Niekct 18,3Potassium 1790Vanadium 26.7Zinc 329

G:\Opendoc\1997\97119ucraflData\GFgardens.doc


34JACKBSInorganic Analyte Concentration MGfl£G

LEAD 265Aluninun 10500Ar§ehic 10.2Bariun 186

Calcium 12200Chromium 26.4copper 50.7 .Iron 19700Magnesium 6450Manganese 589Mercury 0.29Nickel 18.3

Potassium 2220Vanadium 26.6Zinc 279

34JACKBDInorganic Analyte Co ncentratio n MG/KG

LEan 266Aluminum 10800Arsenic 14.1

Barium 228Calcium 9350Chromium 2:J .2copper 58.8Iron 31700Magnesiun 4360Manganese 665Mercury 0.33Nickel 20.6Potassium 2060Vanadium 30.9Zinc 319

G:\Opendoc\1997V)7119UcrafiData\GFgardens.doc


178EXCHDInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 1210Aluninun 6630Arsenic 24,6Bariun 365Cadndun 3,5Cblcium 8240Chromium 40.8 .copper 165iron 24500Magnesium 2640Manganese 449Mercny 0.69Nickel 32.4Selenium 1.7Vanadium 28.8Zinc 853

226EXCHInorgautc Analyte Concentration MGurG

LEAD 648Alunrinun 8830Arsenic 20.3Barium 519Cadmium 2.0Calcium 16600Chromium 30.9copper 144iron 24800Magnesium 5450Manganese 377Mercury 1.1

Nickel 23.1Selenium I.5Vanadium 26.9Zinc 652

G:\Opendoc\1997ro7119ucrafData\GFgardens.doc

:I

•H

•H

•E


234EXCHSInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 1010Aluninun 11300

Arsenic 17.0Bariun 305Cadmium 2.3Calcium 15100Chromium 32.3 `

Copper 143Iron 27500Magnesium 3650Manganese 7151Mercury

0.20Nickel 23.4Potassium 2170Vanadium 29.5Zinc 739

234EXCHDInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 1210Aluminun 12800Arsenic 22.3Bariun 493Cadmium 2.7Calcium 14900Chromium 36.8

Copper 210Iron 29900Magnesium 4140Manganese 757Mercury 0.24Nickel 28.3Potassium 2280Vanadium , 33.6Zinc 949

G:\Opendoc\1997®7119Ucraffl)ata\GFgardeus.doc


234ExcmsInorgalc Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 805Aluminun 8990arsenic 38.6Bariun 335Cadium 2.0Calcium 14400Chromium 25.0 .COpper 114

Iron 27200Magnesium 4320Manganese 620Mercury 0.61Nickel 20.8Potassium 1650Selenium 1.7

Vanadium 27.7Zinc 747

234EXCHBDInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 667Aluminum 7920Arsenic 36.0Barium 314Cadmium 1.5

Calcium 13600Chromium 20.3Copper 103

Iron 18600Magnesiun 4090Manganese 498Mercury 0.64Nickel 17.0Potassium 1390Seleriun 1.9

Vanadium 23.1Zinc 631'

G:\Opendoc\1997\97119ucraftData\GFgardens.doc


ELEmssInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 435Aluminum 7800Arsenic 11.0

Bariun 183Calcium 21100Chromium 16.4Copper 51.9 .

Iron 16400Magnesiun 7220Manganese 359Mercury 0.37Nickel 15.9


ELEVISDInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 452Aluninun 8540Alsenic 10.2Barium 193

Calcium 24800Chromium 15.8

copper 50.0Iron 19200Magnesium 7250Manganese 617Mercury 0.37Nickel 16.9


G:\Opendoc\1997V}7119UcraftData\GFgardeus.doc


VIounR¥sInorganic Analyte Con centration MG/KG

LEAD 270Aluninun 16600arsenic 14.7Bariun 235Chlciun 7220Chromium 23.2copper 56.1 .

Iron 23400Magnesium 3630Manganese 855Mercury 0.36Nickel 24,5Potassium 3500Selenium 2.1Vanadium 36.0Zinc 291

WFOUNDRYDInorganic Analyte Concentratio n MG/KG

LEAD 229Aluminum 14800Arsenic 15.4Barium 216Calcium 5380Chiomiun 20.4Copper 51.2hen 20800Magnesium 3220Manganese 716Mercury 0.25Nickel 22.1Potassium 2700Selenium 1.5VanadiLm 31.3Zinc 245

G:\Opendoc\1997\97119UcraflData\GFgardeus.doc

•D

.I

.I

.I

lj

!H

:I

:I

.I

.I


195EXCHInorganic chalyte Concentratio n MG/KG

LEAD 646Aluninun 9530Arsenic 22.2Bariun 294Cadmium 2.5Calcium 16500Chromium 28.9 .copper 85.2Iron 29200Magnesium 4770Manganese 398Mercny 0.29Niekel 25.4Potassium 1740Selenium 1.5

Vanadium 31.8

Zinc 679

90CENTSInorganic Analyte Concentratio n MGurG

LEAI) 760Aluminum 9400Arsenic 25.6Bariun 374Cadmium 1.6

Calcium 15900Chromium 29.4copper 125nan 33200Magnesium 5580Manganese 797Mercury 0.51Niekel 22.6Pota§siun 1830Vanadium 31.7Zinc 840

G:\Opendoc\1997V)7119uchaftData\GFgardens.doc


2lsTATESBInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 491Aluninun 8770Arsenic 15.9Bariun 345Cadmium 1,7Calcium 9950Chromium 18.5 .

Copper 82.1Iron 19000Magnesium 4410Manganese 381Mercury 1.3

Nickel 16.3Potassium 1450Silver 3.1


21STATESDBInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEJro 376Aluminum 7730Arsenie 15.4Barium 356Cadmium 1.9Calcium 11100Chromium 17.3

Copper 82.7Iron 18500Magnesiun 3820Manganese 382Mercury 1.4Nickel 15.5Potassium 1220Silver 3.1


G:\Opendoc\1997\97119UcraflData\GFgardeus.doc

!1

[1

[D

H


71STATESBSInorganic Analyte Concentration MG/KG

LEAD 410Aluninun 7540Arsenic 11.0Barium 315Cadmium 2.9Calcium 61900Chromium 16.7 .copper 87.2hon 17900Magnesium 7120Manganese 420Mercury 0.24Nickel 17.5Potassium 1260Selenium 1.3Vanadium 20.1Zinc 686

G:\Opendoc\1997\97119ucrafiData\GFgardeus.doc

APPENDIX 8 - GRotJNDWATER CONT0tJR MAP

APPENDK 9 - SLUG TEST DATA

T-to.9L-®

cO

sJe|aun.puao u! }^

8o-- I - Oo

Lr)i=LL-a

C)COCJaC)a 0PIS!C-aa-C)LOa

T

+ir

+/-r

+

/

/

/I

!BS§§?SEEggg:g= % a a a. = r` T:I = ¥ = g. g

g 9 :. g g i : i i :. i -i g. g

APPENDIX 10 - 1987 NYSDEC MEMORANDUM

..EE

DATE=

f-''rf:{v -. U2f l3Wtryc~~tryife~dde5

}1 E M 0 R A Iq D 0 El

Michael Ilnse, Geneva District CffficeNYS I)epa±t=merfe of 15ealth

rcap Jane Et3adey

Elevated }±tal Conoendratioris jn Soils nearCLe"RE FoundyGeneva {C} r CItario (C)

Febr€ 27, 1987

fl`Y#£S¢€oiff#i!°gf§Lsl¥:#:;i:'3-a

At the suggestion of lt[. Thomas yalker, I an forrarding t:he attacheddata for interpretation b}. xpur agertc¥.

-Bning dime 1986r a soil saTrple +7a€ oollectei. fran the prqpertyof rEs. Kay trirgrE¥i, 234 EGchange Strect, Geneva, lee+€=fi4 Ycffki CbnellOniversity canducted the analytical indc and .found levels of iron,cadritm, chromium., a3pper, lead, nickel, zinc and phos=}horirs abovet.Ypical soil valtF~s.

Cornell then a±eed €o anal]rze the green beans grcan in Hs. Ciringeri'5garden. Results are:

less than detectable1.63 ng/ky2.06 m9/kg5-80 ng/k9

31.0 .ng/kgT.3 .RE./fas

This office is requesting an interpretation of these data andthe imicent or long-term threat, if a]ry, to Ms. Ciringeri, her Finopertyand garden craps. ¥caar rec"rmeendations for remedial i:reasares t`zouldalso be appreciated.

A fleeting between aaprcpriate agenc]r personzrel is waarrented.

=nee¥g¥vefivi}¥fo¥ir±nfoLTFs±td±d=+£L:secohactreEoaHangetar=vvattacfi,ca w/attacin: tom tfalJcer

Paul -edi.. " |farri:oti+

ae<;:T.;..:.

.®

rlelals in soil near a foundry. Geneva NY.

ParamoLer Fence Gardefl Mid:;;lie::".

Tolal nitrogenOrganic NAmmonia h'

Pho5ohorusPolassi.urnCalciumrlagneslumSodiumIronAluminummanganese

.CadmiumChromiumCooperLead

Nickel

Zinc

0-'5 0.16

0.24 0.442.93 :.72a.7S O.is0.04 S.Oi3`24 3.37I.'8 L7C

0. I 0. 0,oa

AIPENDIX 11 -NYSDOH JUNE 1987INTER-OFFICE MEMO

.-.Document #5186P

STATE 0F NEW YORK - DEPARTMENT 0F HEALTH

INTER-OFFICE ttEMORANOUM

Mr. Michael Linse

Dr. John Hawley

June 22,1987

.EE.E:.CE:IVED

JUN 2 5 7987

gEg:FSDKtsEgR:¥T

SuBJECT: Elevated Metal Concentrations in Soils Near Geneva .Foundry• (C) Geneva, Ontario County

We have reviewed the data on the heavy metals contamination ofsoils and green beans from the Gringeri residence in the City of Geneva. Ourreview focused on the lead contamination and the toxicity of lead. However,the levels oF zinc, copper and. to a lasser extent, cadmium also appear to beel evated .

The concent+ation of lead in the two soil samples from Geneva arehigh.1y elevated when compared to natural levels and also above levelstypically found in iirban areas but not imediately adjacent to busy highways.

I:ill::e::e°:i::a:n!no:°#: i:n::e#i.:.g:r:;:c¥:#a{|:a: :::n:°i: ::8!naJ::dsin limited sampling performed by this Bureau in 1985. The Bureau's data are Iconsistent with other studies of urban areas. For example, a 1983 study ofsoil in and around Baltimore..Maryland found only lox oF so" samples fromgardens in the city or within 30 miles of the city contained lead levelsgreater than 777 ppm. Elevated levels of lead` i.n soil and dusts are ofconcern due primarily to the potential for increasedt exposure by ingestion.This problem is particularly serious for young children. Blood lead levels inchildren appear to increase above background levels when the leadconcentration in residential soil or dust exceed around 500 to 1000 ppm.Therefore, young children with c}aily access to nan-vegetated areas of theGringeri yard may be subject to increased blood levels due to this exposure.

Studies have also shown that vegetables can be contaminated by leadin garden soil. The concentrations of lead in green beans from the Gringerigarden may be typical of vegetables grown in soils with lead contaminationgreater than 1,000 ppm. We contacted CorneH university.to determine how thegreen beans were analyzed. The heavy metal concentrations were reported on adry weight basis; therefore, assuming a water content in the beans of 80%, theactual lead concentrations in the fresh beans would have been about 12 mg/kgor 12 ppm. In studies with lead in soils in the range of 2.000 ppm, Spittlerand Feder (1978, cited in Elias,1985) reported 0.98 -S.2 ppm in vegetables,afld Preer et al. (1980, cited in Elias 1985) reported in to in ppm(corrected to fresh weight).

-2-

In a recen`t summary of lead exposure data. R.W. Elias of EPA hasestimated that the average daily lead irltake for an urt)an child is 138 llg/clay(47 ug/day baseline dietary exposure plus 91 ug/day for dust and Soil) withoutthe consumption of vegetables grown in an urban garden; a childts intake.wouldincrease by 48 ug/day (about 30%) if all leafy and root vegetables. com andpotatoes were from an urban garden and the average lead concentration in thevegetables was 0.9 mg/kg. An urban adult male.s estimated daily intake wouldincrease from 67 ug/day to 187 ug/day based on the above scenario.

The degree of corltamination in the Gringeri yard and vegetal]1es andknown emissions problems associated with the Geneva Foundry indicate thisproblem warrants further investigation. -I`js.ugges±...I.a.§. €.911ovying steps.betaken:

Hm

(2)

(3). .

(4)

Ms. Gringeri should be advised that the elevated contaminant levelsin so" create the possibility oF elevated exposure. Youngchildren (those prone to placing fingers other objects or dirt intheir mouths) are of particular concern because they can be exposedto such contamination from repeated daily contact withnon-vegetated areas in the yard. Such exposiire can be minimized bycovering with clean soil. Ms. Gringeri should be advised that shemay want to discuss with her physician the possibility of beingscreened for elevated blood-lead levels using the erythrocyteprotoporphorin {EP) test or a bloodT1.ead test expecially if youngchildren are involved. If there are other properties adjoining thefoundry. the same advice may be warranted for them as well.

Exposure to lead may be significantly increased for all familyITiembers if -a high proportion of vegetables consumed on a year roundbasis are from the garden. If Ms. Gringeri has any remainingpreserved vegeta-bles from her garden. we .would like to analyze asample in our laboratory. If a sample is submitted. it should beaccompanied by infomiation on how the beans were prepared (washing,blanching. freezing, etc). Regardless of the outcome of suchanalyses. Ms. Gringeri and other local gardeners should be aclvisedto wash thoroughly aH produce from their gardens to remove so"particules which may contain high levels of lead or other metals.

Work with DEC to obtain all data on the_ _ 1 _ J_ ,,,,potentially be useful in furEE;Iinformation would include fdata. reports of emissions vi

tmayproblem. Such

ry, emissionsOff-;ite`;;1i ;;in;'i'i.;;';:€aY;f aviaTab]e. roses. and on-or

Provide a map showing the locations of the foundry, residentialareas, and other potentially sensitive receptors such as schoolswithin a 1/4 mile radius of the foundry. Of particular concern arefacilities with outdoor play areas for young children.

-3-

wi 1 1 schedui€t:rm::t!::et:e:i::::st::r:::iti::::r::f:;g:ti:S g:un::3:i:e. WePlease contact Steven Bates at (518} 473-8427 if you have any questions or ifMs. Grifigeri or her physician would like to discuss the lead-screening testswith a Health Department physician.

Elias, R.W. Lead Exposure in the Human Environment in K..R. Mahaffey (ed.)Dietary and Environmental Lead: Human liealth Effects,1985. Elsivier

. .Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

CC: Or- KilTI

Mr. Tramon.tanoMr.. BatesOr. StarkMr. WalkerMr. MohankaMr. ReilleyMr. ViolantiMr. DeckerMr. Buf iMs. Peachey

APPENDIX 12 - OCTOBER 6, 1987NYSDOH LETTER

STATE OF NEW YORK•' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHli2.088-87

OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTHGENevA OisTflicT OFFlcE

DAVID AXEL80D. M.D.Coranl.1Ion.I

Ms. Kay Gringeri234 Exchange StreetGeneva, NI 14456

Dear Ms. Gringeri:

• 81 NO8TH STREET

(315) 789-3030

October 6, 1987

• GENEVA, N.Y.14456 -1880

RE: TOXICSHeavy Metal Soil Contamination

This July we met and discussed the bealt:h issues related to elevatedmetal concentrations in soils surrounding the Geneva Foundry. I shared withyou our Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment site history review and con-sequent potential health risks. At that time I also collected additionalsamples of vegetables and soil from your garden. The materials collectedwere examined by the Health Department's laboratories. The results o£analysis confirmed that there is no sithe consumption of edibleare enclosed

nificant health hazard associated with|ants

As discussed, the soilsin your garden.do

metals. Therefore, thorough washing of all fruits and vegetables is recoinendedand important.

Please contact this of fice if you desire additional information or haveany questions concerning the above matter.

Copies of the analysesed levels of heavy

Very truly yours,

L( -< ¢,`-3 ,--. 3-i -.-.i .-

Michael G. LinseDistrict Director

MGL:jbEnc,

cc: Ms. Mary Jane Peachy -DEC, Region 8.:..'..

lD

ID

IE

ID

PAGE: I

sAMP[,i. ID'=PROGRAM=SullRCE: |n:P OT, I T 1 C A '.LA.riTUDE:I 0 C. A T I tl N :

ijE..w yap.i` s.T/`Ti.; itF:tJî{T,|F:i.ii` l.`g. itr::^l,.iì.•rfAr`SWCIRTi.I L.I:I..iTt.R [ùR liAfl|lt!ATuf! 1F:..3 ,`Nu |{l:S[:/`ljcl.i

t{F.sÌLTc; uF E^î+I;t^r.I:jtl t.i:I^L t{F=i,tlKT

*7iaf`Qit 1 s^tipi,E Rt:c£|.v'f:I[!:6.//o./zji/1 i cli^t<(;d:I 06:Blli<LÀl.I I.j[` ENvlHo:1.u[:itlàL I:X.?t]S`Ji<E Tt`tvE:s'i.Tc:^T{utv.

iiRAT,ì^tjf: r`j`.sii.i: G^2r:1.Tt..F.t< (:flijf.`: 3Sti-j!slit`r)IVTs t[.I'l : Gti;I.IEVA c. ctiijî'i'v: n...i'TAR [i.i

• Iic].`GITU[}E;: . .4 ull{F.CT1[)RE:

.234 I:XcitA!.G± Sr Grfh{.±Vt` C AI`J4C€:I.€T FullNni{y

.:£3.:I,:A3?::¥: "-:::;g::i.!t,?P:`:,I:lc TEs.HAi'Ti.p"TIME: l)F SA*PLTNC:: 8.7/U7/1.7

4.72

DESCRIP.rlc}N :GtilivGL`Ri Pf2uPEP.TY Gi\RiiF:rJREPoRi.IiuG I,^B: iu:L,\Bn!{îùt<T I.)r lwuRGAi.IIC At.lAr,rT1(:Al. CilF..`tlsi.kv -ALF`.î

L` A i £ P a 1 1 I 1` F. D : .a 7 / 0 .I / lj 3

SOTL Cc)I.L€CTEr.` Prto,t.I {;At{rtL.tt ltuT..I, 1987. sCOC`pE.Lj FRO.`lcARDrN suRi.ACE; EArfDi`JtiLr UVE:p FtjuH Soi]ARE FGE:I.

FCIT.Lc`'*TIJG P.a.PÀ..`!F:.1ÈRS Nul. rl;`R1. uF TE;.Sl. PA.Ill.£pil

----------- p A R A .`{ a .T` I; R -----------LilGEST[oN iT.F` sri[.ins £-lli{ 4iti:.1.AL,sLF.AD ItJ [!R.Y SOLItjsCHROMluM [hl nR+. ``nL,TL]SCOPPE:R It.. [}R¥ snLIDS .ZINC l!V [lRY SOT.IL}SARS6Nlc IN o8Y si]T.,ir)aCADM|H,.I ire :`cy i:-,... rr)..i

---------- [< i: ti i I 1, T --.--.------r) 0 rJ F:c!71. #CG/C`32.9 Hcc/r`1fl7. tic(;/(;

.tl0'J. MCG/G18.0 klcG/G

• '?.,: .`.|.`;/f:

tf.iT I,f,.11..jG-EtARAiiF.rE:{{s :ì{jt pip-r ijf. TEs.r .iiAiìÈ,QH

----------- P A R A i.4 L` T c. R -----------NIcr`€:L t}. nRy .srii,[ijsSOLIDS` I.Py

37. HCG/(;' 77. P£P|.F::,T

**** I:Nij Or PE:P,JR.I ****

COPIEs sEt:T To: co(2). Rn(rl), LPHL.(2). fF:ii( ), INFn-p( ), I.I.i[.u-I,( )+

N.Ew 1.nt?K ST^.rE: obpARTMEN`r uF [iEALTi!GEt{F:vA DTSTRlcr OFti.ICF:81 NOD.TH ST.GENE:VA.rJ.Y.. 1445t]

SIJF`}.lil.T[;0 a.I. : Lli`ls£

`] u94

PAGE 1

!i[.w y.]BK €;TATt: I.F.tJ^rtTs`!pivi. ..iE. HF:^t,`.1.HWAT`SW.ORl'H CF:NTE.R FUR f.ABUPATiJQ1.I:`S ANU BE:SF^L}CH

ltF:SIJLTS UF F;*`I.J\{*J4.l`IUN i.Il`rf Ai. i<F,iir.IrtT

§£:€:£M:n"710::!:3[,ttEAL,a:.Ag:i::kg,:.:±.i:,:.E:::Z€33t:;+,`.;I:.`'Es.rlG£¥:3:'" 4.12

§i{ii!§i.i:s`,:::v:;:::i:::N§§§;i;:;`;::S;`::Acp;:,„ouooi;.§!!::!`§:.i;!g""`D£SCRIPTltm:GFINGE:RI pRupc;Pi.I GARDF.N

i;:::.:::§5:i?: '°-::i;§§#;`:::i.:I.`T:.¥:R8#R3NALYTICAL CH"ISTRy..`Lp.A,TiME 0F SA.\{PLll.Ic: 87/u7/t7 OATH Pf3lN1.I:D:87/09/„

pEAs HAD.vF:sTEn r{.{ JUNF. 1gfl6-PLACED DiREcl.LY I!u PLASTICp.^r` ANr` E`ROZE..I (P.Qt:-POL[!.uTlrli.I AaATc.`klE^lT).

Fir.LowTNb' PARA+iE.rFTs rtuT PAR.|' OF Tt:Sr PATrt:R.N

;;:::;;;:-::ASS.::I5:.a;;;-:;;;:;-LEAD IW hE:'r `sof.IL>SCHRoriluM Tw wEi SOLIDSCOPPF..R [N k:ET `shLTD.S .ZINC IAl h!F:T `S01.I.DSNlcK=L tN i.JET sintDsARSE:NIC IN WET SOLIDSCADMIUJ,1 IN- WET SuljlDS

-------- I--R i: S (I LT --------.-i, 0 N I

< 0.'20 tlcG/G< a.'20 .¥cG/(:

2.0 !¢cG/G14. .HCG/G

< 1.0 :MCG/G<. 0.20 .MCG/G< u.02 HCG/G

**** E;I.iu tjF` RE;PUR.r +***

COPIES SENT TO: COC2), RO(OJ, T.P!lE.(2), E.ED( ), INfo-P( ), Ii`lFU-L( )

NEw' Y[`RK STATE: DE.T'AB`1'M.ENT UP lil.ALiTH

G8NE.VA DISTPIC1' OF'€.ICE81 Nc,Ri`H sr.GENE:VA.N.Y.14456

SURtlll`T£D BY:LTiusB

.1097.

[D

ID

11

(i

!D

PAGL' I

tiE:W VuRt` STATE: uEt.ARTttEi..T n{.. t{E:Abi'H•¢Answc]tt" C€:¢1TL.R FUR I..ABORATURIES AND t{E:SEARCH

I.<E:SUILTS tJF` EX^/.l.TfiA|'[iJ}f

uu`.nic. LIJ: L)RAI.hJ^l;E BASI.V:POLITICAT. `SnB[t[vlsl0N:Gt;NL-VA i`.

I..il.{AL t{F;lJf]HT

§§ti:::M::: "":`::::ii.kEAlj,`g;:`:.;;,.::k;t;;;;:;';`;:::::€33€:::ìtivEsr|G:.::#:.[:: 4. I?G~^zE;rr[:F:i< CrJo£: 3.it)2

:32#!8:: ~`-.-: --.. Vu":a{tG;iuDL.: . .. £.n:,ii:i:i,;i?:[oDEscR"taN:.2,!fwg§g±Agggp§;[§Eg:g3Eg ATJiJACENT Ft]it`qDRy

i;:::.:Et:i:::i: : io.:::-;;i;:;3.i:::::i.T:`::R3i':;:a:`"Al.YTICAL C{If:.1ISTkv -`LPATIH-I 0F ,SAHP[ITNG.: 87/07/1.7

nAiÈ; pBIN'lÈij:87/og;o3

PO" BE`.AS"S iiARVESTED Juljt. „„ PICKED fROM VINl. J6}rtyrH8.S At3`r)vF Gkou.Vu, PLACEu IN PLASTic BAS A{`JD FRnzF.tJ.

For.rjbwTNG. Pî{Ar[F:.lÈt{S ivoT PART. C}F TLST PA.1'.r£R"

;;:.:;;:;;-i::A::;:E:.:p`;:;-:;I;;::-LEAD Ii`! lfuÈT. Sol,IUSCHt{nMluM [N wet SOLIi)ScOppE:a [t,` .*,FT .àL[ijs .ZIIJC IN hlE:T sdr.TDSNICKEL TN W.ET S;.`L[DSARSENIC .T}J WF:T Sot.lDSCADMIuht I.`J WE:T `SoulDS

81 NORi.H S.T..GE:NEVA.N.Y.14456

---------- t< F: S I I L' I ----------DONE

< 0.20 l'cC/G< il.20 lfcG/G

< I,r) MCG/.C

4.2 .\!.CG/G< 1.() UCG/G

< 0.20 MCG/G0.02 pr.CG/G

*S** g`J,J 0F RE:Pot?.i. **t*

COPIE:S S" lil: Crj(2L Rn" LPHE;(2). £ÈD( ). IITr`0-P{ h lrjF.0-I.( )

tw-F.d I.aRK STATE rit;.FAR.rnght.I Or I+t;^L"GF:NEVA OrsTfiicT OF-FrcF:

.Sur!iiliÌE;n B¥-:hli`.s£

`10 9.t} .

PAGE: 1

(I

ID

1B

'H

SUUHcki ir):POLITICA[,L A I I I U D i. :

tiffiff yuRh sl.Art: i)I:p^Rrt.tF.`îT t.iE` tie:^{;i'!+w^nswcmm cE:!{TE:R FUR i.AHURATcjRiEs Aìu i{F:5E:.qpc.H

i3F:SllLT§ UF EÂiqT..lA|Ì:jN.,

|Ìi.tAL lit:I)i.,tit

§#;M.;:.: " ":'::: :ijttEAii o:î:Ei:Fft3[:::ii:fj::8!:33ul:±ì:vt;sT.I.G,:.::8:E`:•iu:::V:::ui.I::_£N'::`:::.:::E:A`SIN: . i:§i,:::.:i:.§`!:g:34o2.

TIME uF SA.¥PL|NG: 97/07/17 .

4.12

LocATloi" .234 I:xcHAijGÈ sT G€N8vA c Anu^c`F.I.„ Foijwo;yu`"[L"u"DE.SCRIPTIC":GBIhlGt;RI PRuPERIY GARUEtu

:;:::i::`:i:;i?: io.:i::,:§{:::3;`:::::FT!`::ft;!'`:Ei:R3NA'`YTICA"HE{'ÌSTttv -ALBAh

I.)ATE: {'RiN1'E:lJ:87/09/03

P01,E BEAN tiARVESTti`LI JUIIY, 1986 WAsi{ED, STRAI:i`JED 1`~ APRF`..SsUpE CorlKEft 6Òtt 1.5 MIIIu'fES, T;"E;RSED |N CuLu wA.rF.RANri i-RrizL'N (t>RE:-POLLUT10i.i ABATEt{E:N1.).

Foi.LciwTNG PARA"I.iÈ:Rs NcjT pAl:I ur TEST pA.ITEM~~,----------- P A F} A 0! i- T li` a -----------

DIGESTION .i:F Sill.1.DS F0tt ~lt;?.CALSI.GAD IN h'FT sr]|,TDScHt}oftlijM 11` IWFT sciLruscOppER Itw. trET saijlLisZINC I,v kET sol.tDS .NIcttEL Itl ld.ET SbLTDSARSENIC IN WE:T SOLIDSCAD.Itiu,.4 IN WE:T s@Llns

---------- H €S ,J LJ T ----------Jj 0 N i:

< 0.2(1 MCG/G< `).20 `1C.a/G

2.4 F!CG/G4.0 .\tc`G/G

< 1.0 `1CG/G< 0.20 .u.CG/G< 0.02 .UCG/G

**** E;i`j.ii Ur F}L`PijRT ***f

coplE:s SEM Ta: ccit2L RdtoL LPHL." „w ). INr'ci-pt L T!.jFO-L{ ]

NEW yr]RK Si.AIL: r>E.PAR.rMEli!'1. uF .lt;ALTH+

GENEv^ DIsi`Rlci. uFFrcÈ81 NOR1.H ST.GE:NF..V`.V.Y. 14450 SUB,rflTTE:a nr:LINSL.

APPENDK 13 -NYSDEC SEPTEREER 1995FIELD NOTES

3 ` ` ., N . , .

i..,Ai,,.

III 'J'i: 11'111'

i. : 'i rT-'ii :'1

I I•-,..•S)•\

!! 1' '1 ®, I

''1I 'IIIIJlll- I I . I ' i ELffi •\. - . , -, .

• I ,I I I . i ' ' I • ' '-1'I . . -- ` I

•.Ll `1 I,

I'1`, I,'I,I.I.I•',i

• . -LLJ-I 1 !'! ! I ' i i

_'11 I -I ' .I , I . ' , ' I

I I I . , I I I ' I . , , I 1'!'!1

I

•It -. i I I : , ` 1'

I i L' I ,I':..T..i-H-*Th.I, '.'' !§.ts.te¥!&I I+IL,..,,II I ' I '

'`I. i .. '-RE!,¥ i

I I_ I . I TIE

I•.`iin

I'1-S,F5 - ''1

.-1' I:-. , i..:-, +,I I

I11

I .. ..T= i 'LJ± ,'i `5E

I i .,I_--i-''

II, -I

'

I

I'11 '\I,̀' i_I .1' I I 'd I I I 'I

I '''1II.3, Ill ;:.,

1I. I+ „, ' rirT .I!'1 .1 I1'

IT. -i 11,. I I I '

L`.11'\I'1 1'lL='

''1'..,.

''1

II''

:,I I

II II-I I I

'1. ''' I

IIll I . I ' I I,'T 11 I.I

`,sS-RE-.''

''1

i

I-LL II,: ''1I

•

_ap i-I .'' I'1,

IIiII

I I .I

i

IRr

I,I- ''. I I, .caII?II

.i:.:i§,I,i i;§I

11

\I.

I,I

J,..;.•...-,,,

i)ii'I

T§ S!11ffi.!

i

III

S!I.-¥.iI

i:IIIII

:ffi E= - - - -

Iii

I,i

SI IllIi

11,

• --` `_-----.:==--==-1.-_.-. _._------.--..-.--.---..-....---.-------.----------.--..-- . .~+I , It..`-.r`.. `".T3€.pi]tvf?+w7rulJiEE , _ . ..Ii3_.]er/:¥rl}qur.-t.iqf •--,7prFT.7Ezry3Eti*7Tt;i-+-Ji7..i¢wa]FfFpp

_-...-

:io,•'.¥i

I...Iii,ingp tli3-T`§ ¢S

§to£,I,I-,!'1~#iaa\,:aI.21:•..•=1',.,C,...,`£1.?.£.',,,I.•S.Lr.i..-~.`-t...

i i i,¢diIr``,I`rs?£frf+`J^

- #:||||IulllLIII]l[I'IIItl1111'1,11,11,Ill,,,11',111111,'11111111111111,,` i-

. I ..¥{gi%±`g:.: ++.,Dy+of-+€rfr.?.rf`¥¥.;,:ET~^...• :J-,. :. . `. +I:I .-- . . - -.

- ¥'1

E --. -," .§" . Jyll

=,,i.1±a`.,.•,,,'',:i3::!`:..gitv-.-i:,•:S*?``f.J.aa:i¢.•.,t,

•' '_-'---€3i;,a*.,.'tt !\!.i.`E`! E§try ,::jlvjfcoti.,lr

iL!3...3.: LiE££.![#j;.„= 3g?£-S JE§i;i.`SSL° i?...±d==.g.= ... .dd. ......I-.:..:-,--E,±i;;:du_gT! -. i. ' .g-E.=`3`#j`t {£].zz¥= .;.:... ..a.i..*„L:.. .in.':I:?'£:T

`t ,, ,,-=.Life : g.•.?i,;J ,`-'Ii===========C===C=,i.Ii:-i:iii!=i!:i!i3ii.

•-i__ _|!!`J.`#*±_ife= £=•*®!'jfL-Ei! I. i- -€=:===3=:I;I:.SET

''•`1`.E.=-..-.--i-....-....-....---1_-..---._,-,~---,

-.i-..........`.,..-...,............'.............`....`...,.--:,...,.....'..,:.tr<`=`:,..i,.:-..:.=„,'..`.=r........;;`:....'...I:=..:.f`i`.i.,

its;'r-: a-*.?..

!f,E`,.S ,_,tas` a.sS."`| `-.

I>#

.,,.i§T-.I - .I,I .

I , : , I I I''` : IJ

<'II

ffiE¥. . i Stl'''{I I A s I .I ,

'. I 11; . I: I

'' I I i. : :I •1

I, I

•ii ,i-.. .-= `*I. - L= . -,, I11

i Ill-1'i: I •1, I I I ' I11Ill

. I ' I .'' '' r=11

Ill 11,|ut- II -I. 1111 '' 1

• -'i I lt

I

-• I I , ' .

1'.I.:I? .\'I'€' I - - I. I . .t. IJ' I L) |J I I ' I,

JJ-IIH( I. I,,-RB a I -a a IIiRE,-,i.,1I

'' I

1'

•B-S9.,,•,.a._ .. J= I 1£ I:''

II¥

I , I I I

I.'I'i= I,.I`.!1'Ill'1I !'.',II.`' I-, I•T'•T_FT''11'1' ;,I,IHae.;

I

-LJ±,II

i r, it , Ill I . , I I I _ I..: diI.I,I.'I' I ' 11 I-

LL! ._I

IT'''''

11

. . Hti'=11 I I

'

I,'1I

I I.,tFaF± .i; iI

.I.I

'',I 1\

II :, .'1.1''HLJ•'tl:',I

I

''I . :J= II--.+ili .; ' -i -I''1'

II

I

II

I

i RE;=;, I ESIIII_i'T S'I1 ''1''.II

I

I

II IllIIII.:IIJ.iI:.T '11 I '

I ;ii-:5RE+" ngI i `. ,-I I :,':

- _. I `_' ' I . !-, - I.

I

I,is

iiI ,I

§!¥stiS SSI,L.`i;;•:

-tl

•§'Qt;'

iELE. I ' S Q) :-Sii---®-€S S: '¥ " o*a+ET

---i-§RE`-LS-I

IIl``RI I`¥I

::-iiji==Lt §` RE i ,`-?S.=+ RELLTS S-,rfe§ i i¥--=-Its`SRT-T.SngesTse§,.S

. ./..•\.-,,'

;r§ •,¥I .

•,i,i

ii I-a I lllllLILI llIIl di I I I1'V I I I I I I I I LIIEI '.'I I,I I I I I I

rJ-+`-a\\§t\,rIt-"-§_ale'1 I I

I1., [IJ iI I \ I 1!

-$5,

`|+ullllu I i I ^\4 I I I. -L I.

'' -''''

I u T\_ 11I

II,

I I I I I '1,

I 1111 '`: I I I I I

I I 1 . Ill_ I I

' I \ -I

I

II

I

I II _,I.I- I

Ii II I

I

I,

II1' I I 11

`1

I I ' II,, '' I I I I,I I I 1\ I I I '1.IIIJIIII:L||I I ' I

I..`!

J= '1I

i •®

I

Ill I '1 I Ill

.;gI''

I

I It LNII I

I I'1

II

I I I.I I 11-

III

' IRE I

I

I

I 'I I I

I

!11 - \:-±1

I

•1-t++ I- I

E=.JL:

I

i I II_ H.I I iii3iI ` -Hdii

_I''

I

II I

I

I.I

L_,i,,11 I

---I I,I.

I in,\ .,NI I .\Th..I1,,,

I I 1'II ELI h`J,

I II ' lJ lEll 11

II

f.

I ' I I ' I III

I'

I I I I.\[' 11IJEl I I

',II

II

I I

I-*

IImi==`

i

...E<;.,+..:,.:i!;.§,,,-::'!-...7!..:i:.'3``,r§.,,•,#a1~I:'.ii,,i*\

I

.I

ngttELSi£€no:,I(I

I Sds*ngts!rsf?1`I !!,I8SIt' INhl

I 11iEse Ist_,. i i vI:

iIIt5II -=_¥

I''`, ' I¥te. 'I.isIREI

II IIIII

§1!_` _i

I,a

!Si±I

Srs[SII`.

n §III.' §]

I

I '',a

ap-

I:s:II§!-tI`k

IT`:IIis

~. 'ngI,

ISesili±: ts.t\`S.,,¢

leg''I'1

I,STva

q

I.¥.'Y5 I

RE,RE-Ilsl&

- .-, -. - - -- „.-.-..-.-.i.-----_i-. I..i`+t..i-t`;=?.td..ir,.I.tth+.*;?.utg-...i5{.I.I....-.:£t.+_'I.rL^.A

1 =!`- if\ I `.i j ` .is.+.:

....,..S1+:-.•`,`,`:J.`...,,.,.,:'.:::.,,,.,,r'I?.,,

I\jI')''±,•Z•,3`3J'.I

.I.I I, I. I,,. •1 ',.I. 1' I I • ' - _ ..=I..-I:i

r

7S

-S•.~

1' ''' I, :I

I

11`1

I :.,I ' I

rl, 'IID I '1I 1, I '1 I I

C).=:,

I I.I a. I 1' II 1=

IL*|1 I!' I I

' I I I I

I II •!.' I

_I '1'- \ I. I '1 :I I I:

L - I11,

1I

''1' t

II I I I I 1`

I'`SS I ' I I

'I I

I I IT•,1' I I

I I i' I

I

1' I ''' I

I I '1 I I •: I - iI1',L'II ''t I i I I. '' I

I

I

I I I

.II_

I11 I, I

'' N`.=1 I I 1' I I I

I.11 I I'J

11 IIll:HIIIIIIE,J| I I

11 I I jJ IiJ

'

I LJ.11. ''I

11 11. I,

•' ''' I, II

I

I I- IL T+I -' I 1', I 'i'

IIll 'Su I I 1'

T-'1

'1. I'1..i, , - rlr ffi.STII,\I I:

•_I I-I

'11

Ill I \ '1 I `' I '1 I ie ' hi trL| _1111 I I I .I t I.

I. 11 t 11.1 I u.._I I '1 11

I ', I I I I ' I '1 I

' ' 1' I 11 \'tl ul '1 - I I I,I

I I, I'1 I

I 11. I I

. II,-, !`1 I ' I I Ill I I . ' . .

_.I I,. I

I

I .I I

• II+i _-

I I''

I . ( I , , '!`. `::

n.g+I

ul 1,J` ' I - -,11 `

Ia-a,ffi!T[], ,-aEfi,§,ap!,,,i

€RL§I'1I-IlGIII,11

iJqc3I,i:-'1,11I'011iisi±Ei5I,!§IIII1 1'1-Its-\1

''jI

ts-¥III

`1.-181#i..£

glfr&1#!,#

II,,,I.€'I,:`!!,--iH,Ia.§_a_&

u---.. <;---r...``;-...-...,-`..''.:.`'-...'.`.i-,~.`

. [aaitTw.I-.in++A.n

1 •-.

:€•£1a,

... ~1 . > ..f t .... .. . ..I

`,

I

I . ' -+=j1''

._.-...=i =: ffi#'SS. I I,•'1 I

iI -\`~ .5?i=ji.;.-:. `. . ` 11..11 r!

II

.11 •1,L\HI I

- 111] I I•--.- J1.I, 1`

I I

I --.~-._ . ..I 1'

.i. ' I 11 I 1

11 .+ 11 m`n,`r-...J=f:iL .- i..t;;.ib-_i -1 11.I!'' I I

_. ~\+ I.i

I

1I

1'

I I

I

i I

':,

I:.i•£',,`:.,'\

IIITI I

'1=I

'

I..i.;,I

I

lr', •'

\.III

II

.. i...,r`

:i!.¥,II

I

I,\

II *'''.''''i'.*

:i.:i:S..¥,, I

:I

.i•,:-:.`-\..,,j.,'`,`.\,..`1£.:.....•?

¥`.`

I

I .I'I II'1 I

I I ' I I

' ,Ju-..-.--.-.- . ìSiIasRE,,.`,,I,-,iÈ.. iI..,.. ..Il`:iI.

I

11'

\ I I II

I

I

• '

I ..I

-I

II

ì

kJeds i11

'....'..i

i:i diis i,i-si§1F§-I

IIaI'

rT_ I

'!#I_1 ., I

§. 'T1,:I:::-IRElffi`È

II1,

Isera . .RE , ,

II

-iHi. .,Ia?I

dr`

`QIB\ '!ffi _,

I_ . '`

st=RErs'€

II..

III

*fi[B-,§esfasi,-I:\

'1I,§sS''-

pS.ì nestsI1

-I.. . .. ..-.....`. `...

-Jcr.-.``-..-.--~`..-.

1111.5 ei . -. ,`i'.:.?i.:.:.i;':.:.`T]t.\`+ _ I.-

lDbIjljrunnbnEnbb11!D!D•E..

I.,I:i 'iI '!I I_ _ .' €

is•,

' I I I I,I I , I i i , .I

1! I Irl.t -,-` . . . .. ..( 1!'

..i..6L. -t,.•.``..¥...,

I I ''1 11,,. 'J++ i - I II

LJ 11 111 I I •.,` ILIL|,Ill IIll_rT'I

IllIll I_II_

I

Hrl`|t.t . . ` . --. .. •..::..;........`.;i:.u .#-> . I IIll`.'1

II1II ''II

1'''

.>•.. . . a `!.f.,3;!,,®tt=-.t=¥:.;,:i;:.,',rd:.i.,:`......:.i5• I fty~,

1111II

!II

I Ill- I nll I

1111 a I I I I

lil - .

IIll I II [1] . .F. . LI Ill I

I II |IIRI '' I I

'1 '1_ I I11 I

-`S. I |IITqlh`| I I1] I \,

-'-#IIIIIII|+|I.LI II

a.I

I

II I I \\'_

I

I; I II

I•-.

Ii'fI I III `5.`-~..,, Ii' .

r{ I

* I II

III,I

+,,,III

I

I I 11 1 II

-_I_ I I''1'1__t1 Iul[111]1I'_11 II.''

I

II

I

II''

11

I 1-'1I

I

=+i.::i..:.=;~~.I.ii,.£1.v-``..:i::,:i:,.:.J'J•`:i....,`.,+3,,,I:.-.C!.-.t.-,,,.,,'.;,+,,,,

I:

1`..!`.: `,,,I

II I

•,..` j£=-( -.- _- . , I

I

I

I

:.!lRE . .`¥ i±JIsdt=

III

tHI-idlu,\,.---~-.,RERERE, II--- ,, •.- . .

rmJ:t=,?.J+

:]`¥..I, ..FZTf3ri¥.i==.'..`.11,,:..-.....¥`.

iI.,-\.,,.,

i. %t3¥- ` iB.E..i:1i`..?......

II

'

?::.-f.-r. --

-,ERE = ,,

LEEI

...

Lee-~i1`S=i-.':#;`.ve•.. -I-)I

•8.=:.:. . .

I I

I

•:` ..

aef=-i±Tg¥ ...? `«¥¥£.=. -

iiiis;:;:::..:......

I.I.I,Iliststsa;se€¥raE= -, `..~#+#¥rfe.i . -.

'fffEffFifffffEfEfFREfffa`

I-:-

:i..'=`?.`- .'L= •.---.---.-.--.--. .-.-.--.-.-. -~-i---I-__

-.-- . ..----.-.-.-...-I-.-----..----. .. . .• . . . . . ....` . . ' -......--..I: -;-:.i -,---.I---._ =_ ...J|

• . .. .. t.

«.-'. `_-''-'LL/-,--..--I.-A..-+>*1`-i--_,-.-`-.--i.I,,?..JL.-...,..-.---....`^.------==---'-, i-.. i-----i -----,. , I-. --- I ..,I,

it®,.{,`

1111 Ill

I

II 1'li Ill1''1'.. =1.IllI,!'1\'ill

•Ill Ill111 II I I I I II'__i ' 11111 I 11'.IIII-I-.I '111!+I '''' II

I: Ill,`-.D• -,.`.,..

Ii..

11,i,

I

I

i .': :.,.`,?,...,

:i::i:

I--,.1

'.r\

•,,.II 1'II-,--- -,,---

I• ,. .. .i.__._I_*....a-....-.+-....-....1':''ilI I

I,IIll I,I

::I1

I

I \I;,.i

•;'.;'.'.....::11I 1'I__, •

I

I

=ng 'I

I

•::.,

.- •'.\I

::.:..I 11

I

-3``-'.- `--.-```--**. -.•.-E='... -. I :-- ..;`:--.: .i. . r.. i,.,i--

-.,,~ -LI| .

I_IIII I

I

i -± =J-',--.'? -.---....

..

.... .'.

__:..=. -._ _ .1

L

•...-

I . ------ . . - ~ ,-,,,.,!1 '

•..;,i..-.`.,..=ql=..

=Z1 - - , 1'

I

'I

I.`I11,

•:.I::: - in-£E=- `=\[=;I.=- _L=.IIIIII 1I . .I,J| . . . -. -.- I 1'

- - -, \ I I-' .I #.=r--l=i3ir= - i- . , . I I

I,„iliiiiii,flit,,,,Hl:;!i,i.,ii !I!il-,"",, "" ,FT,:

+

-.- . ` •``-.,.,.-.1..,...-+.

**`'1iI

Fi..?,:` ` a...

:,..,,i,ffia'3¥• . .- :. ..: I : := -. -.-.-i.1= I .

I..:................

']=.`.....`...,...,:....• . ... ...!t:£ii!f±±E!ii¥¥.:i..;.,.- . . . .

.

ii•..i..:.-:......I i.

..::;;.....:..:.:....,:.. a•'i. •:::.:

Ill•,.

n

--... : ... .. i... --=`-_11_ . I-•

:.....• ``'.¥ J| `

.-.

II

I.I

EEF#' • ..a.Lut.i•:...:!

RE.-!iqu'ms= ..

i`•.. .. .- .:.:1 t'.,`

: q`? ,• -.-.-... . ..-,:: ..: ; .

I. . ....

.;.:.::..

` .:-:: ..;...

S.g.I :.;i.•-... ....,:..

==..1

•..'--..'..'.:::.,';.::::....:.::.:-

=1'1'.

I

I.•_'_,_ .

2::;.:...

;,I...it..A....:LE,...

I

..;;.;:,:.:;..

`:.5-,,®

•..

I,!iS,i `.,

.

!-...

I•.-

..I,.A t --` •..::.

I-.-.--*-

•t.-.--.JHm r~vyurw`iu 5 I-q..mL. .a /=.yT..). I/tr*[ +.T``. + rlgr+Y~¥T r± , ifen!.L][-,..|``£,HPHiRzslt=J*¥* - -___ RE

I

..' .I--.--.--

iI))III

\J

iS£!:,

*,.

11'' I__rrrr_I 1111 I I I111111I11II

IllII__I11'116,,,,,

II

II•' ...:... ...:'

•-,-..:-..-,.-: EI]!I

.,...:.??,i:........::.::::..:.......

I I

I

I,lbllI

••. .

Ii

....

.... •..

'.,II

•t. .... . . .. .

I--.:+,:

1\

I

....

• ... .

i:.:..

- •.'E\ IIh--11 •.. +

::.i..:.-.::

Ill• ..

..•|..-.:ck

I•...

- ...:, ::,.. .

....I.`?. .i- 1111•.. .

•iI \1'11

•. • .. . .: .::rT.. -..•.'

II rL-.:..... • ..-.'-J.

.. :..

j .,.>.--.ri---`.-.-11-.i-'.-_i:

11 J||•

...

. \11

I

...

•'-.'.-:`T

...

I

... '

.' ' :'

i.,...'...,.'...:

111111I.I

I'

I

... .. •.I

I IHJ I I I I I 11 l''.T-il I I• ... Ei .A

f. I I I 1111 ' I 11111I111I1111I'Ill 1''.

I I I I I I I11 11'1 '1 I

_I,_

iiI

:.ll lillllll

I

IIIIII,I.. ... . . . . IIIIIIL=IRT

• .. :. . . - . I . . - , . , I-I '1a.. ... . .'..

. . --\-;....:.=.:+.;:...i.'l=?!`

...

....`........

I...

:'.:::.I;::...-:...: - • . .' .`,-...-...i.a:I,.`'RExp.

¥,-__, -I

. . ...

i+:IJ.' .i/.i-,.

•:ii-::-:-;;;:

.,,•,,

I.......

•.. .I i -:..i...-...I;:i`.

I,IIaII..` ..I...

•...I TS1-i .i- . .. . *_:-... ti- -.

.. .. .

. |tt+ }H .- -I, . -., ..L4,..

£:!j:::i:ill_. , .i --i. I--1T,ijI.'.

•..

i.....•. . , I- -'_-:. I-.±~+,..`

I

IH... '•. I I . - .~-,,, ,P -+

E..-- .. .. . ' T=. 3J,•... • I...=.... . ~ . . ..:..I?-I?.f'.-

.11lj Ill

£ .->1 . . . . _ . : , .-. . .- 2`

111111111!

'

:1. J'.:

•RE ' _`.-.'` __--__-_ i_ ' _'----.'_`-'_-_-:-'`_-'-__=*'.`_'_ -_____---_-._______._.__ _` ' ' - .---_-g5,¥.Z±

f2

:,

ts,

I 1' 11 1'' 1111 I I I I I I i I 11111 I II 11 11 I I

a,ap

IIII 11 I I '1 I !11' 'illlll I 111[ I 11

}!

I I I , I l I I . IIlmlllllllllllllll[|I[I.1.'1..I I.!ii''..``.=j?i.€i:.\`: `I : I I I I i I : '.: i I I I I II Ill II II 11

.5,3!8!:;r'i;t}.S.'`3`*:i.II'I::,:'}}ifeI

1•S

C.'

`t'..¥`.i-r¥¥::+.f '`-ts`.±-.`t.Efg;.i£... .

•'15!.`i1\'I''1''1'

II

IIIIIIIIII I ``? ¥#'E.., : +~L(.'.-'S~.,,It-i:._:-ti

111I.11,'1.II'il11i.1±..-!Ii.-LIJ'1'I:1''1,iLS._,1'

1

IIll'11''1'''11111Ill1',11'1''1'

Jr:

•..#,i.,.-.i.

~'.i.`.t`=.- ¢`'2+.,>\I:|*^, I II-1'E_I1'II.''I

RE' I'.i.H.I•,,,11,.,.III111Ill,i:I

;H'!,:¥i!`..:.I!ffi11''','1.

rfu.

III

II I

I

't.. ..I.- .. '^. .

-' ±_' .. : --.: .^b¥>i--II11 •f-.i_:.if± I I

1'' I I I , I I I I I I I I r I-1` , r ,. I I !\11, I•'

I 111I '1 I I I I I I Ill I ! '11'''1 I I I : I, i

1!1111 i,11-!!

VstsI

-..•.

~•-.-¥j=, I

I«.,•q*

1

se !TSRI_'1Q£T'-tsL--

.`#=t -.!...{` .:---

i?J `' :`fi\i!.;..:` ` ... . j¥'.

I

I,

.'' I.:*-.':.:.`:.-.`-:;£ +

i

_`. 7{.I;:fiit:;-I=i.==:+_-_?++.Jr:.JZL:L\

----I

•se;:;:.,. ¥ 'F3l=_ass

L_,,

+.-t; - -

1!11111 !! I I I I I I I I I ITl q6¥-._..,./`• .--_,,,._-.-..J---'--'----a_------de

APPENDIX 14 - 1995 RECRA ANALYTICALDATA

r--I +

.:

PE.CRAENVIRONMENTALINC.

Chem;cal and Env;ronmental Analysis Services

Mr. John RyanNew York State Department ofEnvironmental Conservation50 Wolf Road, Room 305Albany, NY 12233-3502

RE: Analytical Results

Dear Mr. Ryan:

October 26, 1995r:ng .:'.?`--I F= .i .T5 `? -i`;

`: :F. :i .* ...}-. :.i ,.' ..''}3

i `.-.ri -... ' `-'= . ' _-==' r'`'-I --- ' `-'''--`_!

I

I. .' NOV -6 i.:,:;;5 ;

:_ .-.... ____ -~ __._.!!`!., S C?E:.:T. C}`= i.`j..+'3 .-... :........ : ;:.`i'T..i.L

•..`.C:.:`.-±E.=.`J.:..i..?ft'?:`T=;:;...`:8

ts|.¥!`,TS./''£.=..'.,.',.)

Plcase find enclosed results concerfung the analyses of the sanples recently submitted by yoiiragency. The pertinent information regarding these analyses is listed below:

Comract #:Ca(se # ..SDG #:Matrix:

Samples Received:Sample Dates:

C002989RE0950920Soil & Water9121195 .912!f)19S

If you have any ques[ious concerning these data, please comact Ms. Deborah Carella` ProgramManager. at (716) 691-26.00 and refer [o the I.D. number listed below. It has been our plcasur.eto provide New York State Departmem of Environmental Conservation with EnvirounentalTesting Services. We look forward to serving you in.the future.

Sincerely,

TZA`DA£

DAC/REK/dmsEnclosure: Diskettecc: Region #8

Deborah A. Carella `Program Manager

%{th.i,.K.I.aboratory Director

I.D. ue5-5065#NY4A5020

Auaut)on Business Centre . 10 Hazelwooa Drlve . Arnnetsl New Yor.* 1d228.229e .17:61591-26o0

1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

RECRA BNVIRON

I,ab Code: RECNY Case No. : B±±Q2±

atrix: (Soil/Water) WATER

ample wt/Vol: 5.0 (g/mL) ±£L

Ievel: (low/ned) ±Q!:I

Moisture: not dec.

Column: DB-624 ID: 0.530 (mm)

Extract Volume:

GAS NO. COMPOUND

Contract: C002989

SAS No. :

EPA sAes©®:. .

GENE01

SDG No. : 0920

Lab Sample ID: A5506501

Lab File ID: J5038


Date Analyzed: _O__9i2_5J±±

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS :(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L

FORM I VOA 3/90

NYSDEC ASP

1INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET

Name : RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Contract: C002989

I I,ab Code: RECNY Case No.: RH095 SAS No. :

Matrix (soil/water) : WATER

Level (low/ned) : LOW

000017-,

NYSDEC SAMPLE NO.

GENE01

SDG No. : 0920

Lab Sample ID: 5110


% solids= 0.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : UG/Ij_

GAS No.

7429-90-57440-36-07440-38-27440-39-37440-41-77440-43-97440-70-27440-47-37440-48-47440-50-87439-89-67439~92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67 4: 4 0 - 0 2 - 07440-09-77782-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-28-07440-62-27440-66-6

Color Before: COLORLESS

Color After = YELLOW

analyteAluminumAntimony_`ArsenicBariumBeryllHCadmiumCalcium-ChromiuFTCobaltcopper_IronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercury_NickelpotassHSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliinVanadium-Zinccyan-

Concentration

SN

Clarity Before: CLEAR

Clarity After: CLEAR

Comments :LAB SAMPLE ID: A5506501-SG000003TCLF EXTRAET

Texture :

Artifacts :

FORM I - IN12/91

lab

NYSDEC ASP


Name : .RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Contract: C002989

ab Code: RECNY

)atr±X (Soil/wa:er) : so::Se N°. : RHO95

evel (low/ned) :

Solids :

LOW

90-4

SAS No. :

000018NYSDEC SAMPLE NO.

GENEO2

SDG No.: 0920

Lab Sample ID: 3769


Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

GAS No.

7429-90-57440-36-07440-38-27 4 4.0 -3 9 -37440-41-77440-43-97440-70-27440-47-37440-48-47440-50-87439-89-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-07440-09-77782-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-28-07440-62~27440-66-6

)lor Before: BIjACK

)lor After: YELLOW

inalyteAluminumAntimpny-ArsenlcBariumBeryllHCadmiumcalcium_ChromiuFTCobaltcopper_IronLe.a.a .MagnErfuManganeseMercury_Nicke-iPotassffiSeleniumSilversodium_ThaiiiaFTVanadium-ZincCyanide

Concentration

1630

Clarity Before:

5

5


)mments =LAB SAMPLE ID: A5506502-SG000010

Texture : MEDIUM

Artifacts :

FORM I - IN12/91

[Hab

NYSDEC ASP


Name: RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Contract: C002989

Lab Code: RECNY

[Hatr±X (soil/wa=er) : so::Se N°. : REog5

(ie::,i(low/med) : I.OW

Solids: 97.2

n[E

[E

!E

[b

n[1

[1

[D

!nor

SAS No. :


GENE03

SDG No. : 0920

Ijab Sample ID: 3772


Ccincentratioq Units (ug/Ii.or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

GAS No. Analyte ConcentrationI

C Q M

7429-90-5 Aluminum5iUU5B-*

7440-36-0 intimony 6.2 N--- Pp_7440-38-27440-39-3 Arsenic - 2.2 F_7440-41-7

BarJ.urnBeryllin 21.40.41 - p_p-7440-43-9 Cadmium 10 -*-- p-7440-70-2 Calcium- 2600 p-7440-47~3 ChromiuFT 97 P

-'7440-48-4 cobalt _ 6.216.32820o'14i.1977283_.0.o6=6.22530.610.109960.617440-50-8 copper PP*--7439-89-6 Iron -7439-92-i .Lead_ P-7439-95-4 riagnEEri Fp_-7439-96-5 Manganese -*-- -7439-97-6 Mercury P7440-02-0 Nickel _ CV*---7440-09-7 potassin P7782-49-27440-22-4 Selenium . PW--silver. - F7440-23-5 sodium_ Fp--*7440-28-0 Thalliin --W -7440-62-2 Vanadium- FD

10.329.6 *7440-66-6 ZincCyanide ----*--

PNR

I -Before: BLACK Clarity Before:

Texture : MEDIUMor After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:

ments :LRE~S"PLE ID: A5506503~SG000010-_

12/91FORM I - IN

[E::

NYSDEC ASP .

1

INORGAHIC JINAIIYSES DATA SHEET

{HName : RECRA_ENVIRONMENTAL_|Nc. _

h.Code: RECNY~ Case No. : RHO9S

{soil/wacer) : SOII._

Contract: C002989_

SAS NO-:

UUuu--NYSDEC SAMpljE NO.

GENE04

SDG No. : 0920~

Lab Sample ID: 3773


[iiE

[1

n

n

n

n[[

1[

[D

i {1ow/ned) : LOW_

1 ids :

lHcolor

98.2

U .ts (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/K(

GAS NO. analyte ConcehFration C2000QMi-Fi--

7429-90-57440-36-0 AluminuTn_Antimony_ 6.i17.3_22.0_.0.41_1.0_2540_6.96.118.7_SS50_66.5_84-11370.03_6.1.2135_N-_-a_U_U*--_-_-U_*_--_-

5Pp=FF=PF=0T,NE

7440-38-2 Arsenic~7440-39-3 Barium_7440-41-7 Berylllum7440-43-9 Cadmlum~7 4- 4 0 - 7 0 - 2 calcium_7 4 4 0 - 4. 7 - 3 Chromium_7 4. 4. 0 - 4. 8 - 4 cobalt_7 4. 4 0 - 5 0 - 8 copper-7439-89-67439-92-i7439-95-4 Iron_i:::EEITm

8UU

-'---* -7439-96-5 Manganese7439-97-67440-02-0 Mercury_Nickel_ -*---7 4 4- 0 - 0 9 - 7 Pocassium 0.60

`W---7 7 8 2 - 4. 9 - 2 Selenium_ 0.107440-22-4 silver_ 1260

*--7 4 4. 0 - 2 3 - 5 Sodlum~ 20.27440-28-0 Thalllum_Vanadium 10.2

-*--*--7440-62-2 23.47440-66-6 E;::ife= --

Before: BIjACK~

Color Aft,er: YELI.OW~

Clarity Before:

Clarity After: CLEAR_

Comment s :LAB SAVPLE_ID:_A5506504-SGOO00"

FORM I - IN

Texture : MEDlur

Artifacts: ~

12/91

'1::

NISDEC ASP


Name: RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Contract: C002989

Code: RECNY Case No. : RH095 SAS No. :

atrix (soil/water) : SOIL

•evel {low/ned) : I]OW

Solids :

OOooelNYSDEC SAMPLE NO ...-

GENE05

•,

SDG No.: 0920

Lab Sample ID: 3774


97.8

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight} : MG/KG

GAS No.

7429-90-57440-36-07440-38-27440-39-37440-41-77440-43-97440-70-27440-47-37440-48-47440-50-87439-89-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-07440-09-77782-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-28-07440-62-27440-66-6

olor Before: BLACK

:olor After : YELLOW

inalyteAluminumintimony_ArsenicBariumBeryllffiCadmiumCalciumChromiuFTCobaltcopper_IronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercury_NickelpotassriSeleniumSilversodium_ThalliEFTVanadium-ZincCyanide

Concentration

Clarity Before:

W


omments :LAB SAMpljE ID: A5506505-SG000010

Texture : MEDIUM

Artifacts :

FORM I - IN12/91

NYSDEC ASP


Name : RECRA ENVIRONMENTAI. INC. Contract: C002989


ix (soil/water) : SOII.

el (low/ned) : LOW


GENE06

SDG No.: 0920

Lab Sample ID: 377S


olids: 98.2


GAS No. Analyte Concentration C5a Q M

7 4 2 9 - 9 0 -.5 Aluminum 2230 * F7440-36-0 intimony_ 6.1 N p_7440-38-2 Arsenic 1.2

*

F7440-39-3 Barium 23.0 aU P7440-41-7 Beryllium 0.41 p_7440-43-9 Cadmium,_ 1.0 U p_7440-70-2 Calcium 2330

*

p_7440-47-3 Chromium 5.3 P7440-48-4 cobalt _ 6.1 55UUaUU5U P7440-50-8 copper_ 10.8 P7439-89-6 Iron 4750

*

P7439-92-1 Lead i3.7 F_7439-95-4 Magnes].urn 882T p_7439-96~5 Mariganese 84.3 p_7439-97-6 Mercury 0.04 cV7440-02-0 Nickel 6.1 * P7440-09-7 Potassium 229 P7782-49-2 Selenium 0.60 W F_7440-22-4 Silver 0.10 F_7440-23-5 Sodium 1290 * p_7440-28-0 Thallium 0.60 F-7440-62-2 Vanadium 10.2 * p-7440-66-6 Zinc 27.1 * p_

Cyanide NR

r Before: BLACK Clari.ty Befor&:

I After: YELLOW Clarity After: CliEan

Rents :;JAB SAMPIIE ID: A5506506-SG000010

Texture : MEI)IUM

Artifacts:

FORM I - IN12/91

NYSDEC ASP -

iINORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET


i:,:Name: RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Contract: C002989


atrix (soil/water) : SOIL

level (low/ned) :

Solids :

)lor Before:

)1or After:

LOW

96.5

GENE07

SDG No. : 0920

Lab Sample ID: 3776



GAS No. Analyte Concentration C55U Q M

7429-90-5 aluminum 3700 * F7440-36-0 intimony_ 6.2 N P7440-38-2 Arsenic 8.9

*

F_7440-39-3 BariulTl 73.3 p_7440-41~7 Beryllium 0.41 p-7440-43-9 Cadmium i.0 p-7440-70-2 Calcium 20200

_p_

7440-47-3 ChromiuFT 16.8-

*

p_7440-48-4 Cobalt 6.2 5aUUa5 p_7440-50-8 copper_ 43.7 P7439-89-6 Iron 30000 P7439-92-1 Lead 211 F_7439-95-4 Magnesium 2590 p_7439-96-5 Manganese 360 * p-7439-97-6 Mercury 0 . ogT cV7440-02-0 Nickel _ 15.0 * P7 4 4. 0 - 0 9 - 7 Potassium 510 p_7782-49-2 Selenium 0.62 W F_7440-22-4 Silver o .1o_. F_7440-23-5 Sodium 277 * p_7440-28-0 Thallium 3.3 F_7440-62-2 Vanadium 10.3 * p_7440-66-6 Zinc 235 * p-

Cyanide NE

BLACK Clarity Before : Texture : MEDIutyl

YEI.LOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:

)mments :IjAB_SAMpljE ID: A5506507-SG000010

FORM I - IN12/91

=IiE

NYSDEC ASP .


Name: RECRA EiwIRONMENTALINC. Contract : C002989


trix (soil/water) : SOIL

vel (low/ned) : LOW

N¥SDEcsAM9PE°N°o?4

GENEO8

SDG No. : 0920

Lab Sample ID: 3777

Date Received: 09/21/95Solids: 95.3

Concentration Units tug/Ij or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

n

nifl

n1[

lD

!Dor

GAS No- inalyte Concentration C Q M

t 74 2 9 -9 0 -5 Aluminum 604055U5UUaUU

* P7440-36-0 Antimony_ 6.2 N P7440-38-2 Arsenic 7.6

***

F_7440-39-3 Barium 85.0 P7440-41-7 Beryllife 0 . 4. 1 p_7440-43-9 Cadmium 1.0 P7 4. 4 0 - 7 0 - 2 calcium_ 55900 D7440-47-3 ChromiuFT 17.3 p-7440-48-4 Cobalt 6 . 2_. D7440-50-8 copper_ 39.7 P7 4. 3 9 - 8 9 - 6 Iron 20700 p-7439-92-i Lead 252 F7439-95~4 Magnesium 7110 p_7439-96-54 Manganese 459 D7_39-97-67440-02-0 #:::fy- 0.87140

*CVP

7 4 4- 0 - 0 9 - 7 potassin 1200 p_7782-49-2 Selenium 0.630.102290.63 W F-7440-22-4 . Silver -

F7440-23-5 SodiuTn- * 07 4 4- 0 - 2 8 - 0 ThalliFT a7440-62-2 Vanadium 10.3 * P7440-66-6 Zinc 257 * p_NE

Cyanide

Before: Bl.ACK . Clarity Before:

or After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEan

ments :LAB_SAMpljE ID: A5506508-SG000010

Texture : MEDIUM

Artifacts:

FORM I - IN12/91

NYSDEC ASP


ab Name: RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Contract: C002989

ab Code: RECNY Case No. : RH095 SAS No.:

atrix {soil/water) : SOIL

±evel (low/ned) :lri

Solids :

lDolor

IJOW

00002SNYSDEC SAMPLE NO.

GENE09

SDG No. : 0920

Lab Sample ID: 3778


86.3


CAS NO.

7429-90-57440-36-07440-38-27440-39-37440-41-77440-43-97440-70-27440-47-37440-48-47440-50-87439-89-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-07440-09-77782-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-28-07440-62-27440~66-6

Before: BI.ACK

olor After: YELLOW

analyteAluminumAntimony_ArsenicBariurnBeryllriCadmiumcalcium_ChromiuiFTCobaltcopper_IronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercury_NickelpotassriSelep-iumSilverSodiurn~ThaliiFVanadium-ZincCyanide

Concentration.

27600

Clarity Before:

W


omments :I-AB SAMPLE ID: A5506509-SG000010

Texture : NED Iui\;I

Artifacts :

FORM I - IN12/91

Ii-c+i+p-\

I-'§U[DiI-!1:-iF`.I....LjI[#iH•ffEI:.i

?t^±a<=ua=§I

)

)(

)):I,I )I

L,iIIII((

jI

U,uJCC==J-1-<<ZZgot£€>>Caa9C)c)L|,uJ>>lJJuJuuWuCCcE,I,\JJ==-~uLuL-<<QO

!''dA

Eil•yrtyz;a g`04f»=£ay.u-SE~\-<<ZzuLÙ,t^>>a)aoaQuJdIVlIun3JC'c'ZzJ'J|LJuC=cE

-I

I \ - \ \ - \ \! a

al1 I I \

1 \'

I I0-<

i

' ( ( / i-,I '/ '1 atA983iI

-\ \\ 1®aa®aPC,a0aa>aaaaa£®®aCa)tlEa0ua1'=aaCaIaI,5L` ì \

-aJa~a>a=

LL'=<Iu~t^ci

'•<Ù\±;?\`\\-is\t\:iuJa::lT\CJt^£.,o:J:.r\<0 aC'+<uC)\JZaL<•L`0a)<a:®tLIau

\'*SSX

€i€`se\+d'SSJ•".`

\0=Si--\

:J=+I::iiiI

II

IiI <<ae,3£€>>®caOo¥¥8Sg aICE,:g5-58.¥§

`'., U3

=%.-|J:§C1 :\u<|LJ=-\u-q[a

Y k X* X * X X|LJCE3-aZ9`LO>:\uJI0,5àa=\ ua:JL<atJt^>atuI01IC'aJ ua:I~aZat^>aJC)uI0,.aZJ

a € a €S = €v) a ¥t 11=LutJ=aa 01u_)

iD_esia'C)-

+,a- a- C)T}a- na+-

aSI o\N * & >S GT`T€, a* * * Ia=0<Z*,u7

ia)ty g!m! a)J€U

£o,;i'cL,So 11try G G tr¢u tr

LIJ |L'CE tJ,Cr

APPENDIX 15

GENEVA HSTORIC SOCIETY

(

•,,

.

\

1

\((J(

)

J`~`

I

~-~,

E-_E=.H

i

•`\,r

/

ul

!!

i

-o,.I

TJ1

`

I

'

I_I

`

i.'1

LELJ]EEEEEJ=J=

...,

~

=:iXa!=I-cOI 8!C4,=* o>`CQO'a=

?1It-`?:\±'5;`=C| Iee

tsJaI3-ai;9Ec3=t9at=a'!0`£aJ®0aC>-eCq Oe C>

:€cae-C, 8-ts 8`a

£8E£to CO ce i

e l =_. CO tl.§i\=!i§ce -a30 =r - -

;.;I?.:.i!eJ1^5c;.

ueu,EJ)

•~-0

?i.:EE'g0 c?flz -i g 2b= CJ 5CC i _acO

OCI i.ts'=h E1

=% Of <8fQCLCO < ta

I

*

EEEH

\

.,,

.

n

H

n

n

n

n!D

ID

ID

ID

Geneva Historical Society

Industrial Pursuits :The History of Manufacturing in

Geneva, New York

Linda NorrisRIverhill

July, 1997

This report is rrlnde possible with the support Of a grant from the New York State Council on the Arts

-21

n

n

n

n

n[D

ID

fu.

ID

ID

Multiply the square Of the diameter of the cylinder in inches by thecube root of the stroke in feet, and divide the product by 47, thequotient is the number of nominal Horse power.

Remarks: This rule assumes the assistance of a uniform effectivepressure upon the piston of 7 lbs. per square inch. The AfmalEe!±celof an Engine can ordy be ascertained by the use of anIn_differ_attached to the cylinder, to indicate the amount ofpressure .or Vaccum existing within the Cylinder, about one pounda half of the pressure per square inch is auowed for friction,working the air pump, eta., expended on the Engine itself,

fwri[teninthesidemarginis"AccordingtoBowne,alsoNewYorkEngineWorks." Catchpole's 1867 a.ccount book gives an idea of his business. He

provides a quote for IIham Wilfiaus o£ Wyomil`g County, "Estimate for tenhorse power engine & boiler with Engine attached to boiler. Boiler with fire boxand sufficient 2 inch tubes to make the required amo\int of power-the engine &boiler with all the fixtures-smoke pipe, heater, governor, etc. so that it can bemade portable power. deliver on the cars or carnal, weight, 40,000 lbs. price$900.00.''ThepricesOfen8ine6arebasedonboththehorsepowerandthesizeo£Cylinder.28

Pages labeled "New Shop Account 1867" evidently reflectJ'.the materials forthe construction of a new fa.ctory. The payments include se7.14 for a bill ofshafting from New York, $9.00 for 15o lb. of iron for girders, e[c., 96 cents for 81bs of Hangar bolts and nuts, and se.50 for 250 feet of hemlock board. 29

h1887,thePierce,ButlerandPierceCgmpanyofSyracusebough[Catchpole out, purchasing his patents, shop and machinery. in somecorrespondence, they condnually ask Catchpole and his partner, Corydon Wheat,to protest and bring a halt to other companies who are maou.facturing boilerssimilar to the Florida, without the patent. Ca[chpole continued to run thecompany for the next five years. The company eventuauy moved the operationsto Syracuse, a direct result, Herendeen writes, ''of a. long and bi.tter strike amongGeneva molders that for lack of better city pouce protection caused the move toSyracuse," around 1903.30

However, a brochure fclr the Geneva Foundry Corporatiorl says that it Wasformerly the Catchpole t3oiler, Foundry and Machine Company and the name

was changed to the Geneva Foundry Corporation when the business wasacqu.iredbyWiluam].Ererman,Sr.InteIviewswithworkersatthisfoundry

provide insight in what it must have been like to work at many foundry andforge jobs-hard, dirty. and occasionally dangerous. Unlike many other Genevacompanies, the foundry did not discriminate, hiring both African.Americans andLathos. h an interview with Kathryn Grover, John Kenney described gettinghiredatthefoundryandhiswiorkthere:

I heard that they were hiring down there at sixty cents an hour, andhere I was making thirty cents. And if you can get on, they said, asa machine man or a floor man that you would make good money-That was the highest wage there was around here then. PateritCereals only paid forty, fifty cents and hour. . .Andes was the same;that was a strict union, a closed shop. They had to pay at least adollar an hour for their journeymen. That's journeymen; that's ten,fifteen, twenty years,. that`s the most you made. . .

When I started at the foundry I was making forty cents.

¥f:a:td::i;dnc¥;;d¥efh:[3]::b[¥t:a:d:::u:pta#:e{:a::#mEar:P:otrofu:I::nr::atu:dran there and. ran over there. And that's what I did, and that's why

. I got burns an over me.` This he.re came from picking up what wecall pigs, ingots of iron. The thing slide ciut and it dropped down

. ar`d a piece oftha{ sHtme in the face. Ihad abouteight Stitches and 'DocSnyderseweditup,andmybosswantedmetocome.backtowork and he said, "you're going home, John.-" So they wanted todock me for the whole afternoon. That's when the ulrion steppedin. And I had joined. h fact I still got my card. . .

I was a journeyman molder twelve years, opt of forty-seven .. .I worked on a machine on the side floor. . .We made Easy Washer .I)arts when I was just new there. Easy Washer had a big order inthere, and i[ was a stable order--that's what paid our Christmasbonus. We had a beautiful contract. This machine here puts downwhat they call the drag--it's the bottom part of the casting-facedup, this man here put the hard part down, which was the cope, ittook two men to carry this. Now the man that carried this or`e setthe cores, what we call ^cores, and went back to this other machinewrdie the drag man tcok his flask and went back and startedanother mold. He was paid approximately ten per cent oLit ofeverything they put down. If they made good, he had a good paycoming. If they lost any of 'em, his ten per cent was gone. He

22

J23

IIn

n

lD

b

tl

fu

n

!D

Wasn't making any more day work, as we can it, than I was pushingthe bowl, because I got ten cents more an hour for pushing thebo.Wl. I had to push the bowl for an hour and fifteen minutes,which was running iron to these various floors, and there was a lotOf them then, au the way around.

About a .hundred, a hundred and twenty people workedthere then. Because they had about thirty, thirty-five journeymenau went to union meeting and the rest were au apprentices. Theydidn'twantusintheunionbecauseweweremakingle§s,bu[itSupplanted their benefits to have us in there. We paid. the samedues that they paid, and they were getting jouneymen.s pay for it,and we had to pay the same dues. I have my bc>ok~three dollarsand a half every months, and it come out of your pay every twoweeks.

To Kemey, the work of tipping the bowl was "just like pouring three hundredand fifty degrees at you;" anc>ther Genevan, Mose Kermey, who tried foundrywork soon left saying, "Everything I touch here is hot, dirty or heavy." GloriaPeak's father worked at the foundry and she remembered visiting his workplace,

I remember going to the .foundry. And I remember the foundry justbeing a horrible place, because it was all metal andL§±gel andLf99t

` andj£±it. Afld dad would.always come home, his clothes vyould beblack. You kriow, mom was always washing these black clothes,

:yfget:o8ge:t:eo:eel::;infiheieo:€owgaesthd¥Fu%:.re:eqm[b8e°rtagagging, and when I came out I started to Sneeze and spit, it was allblack, and it really sea.red me, you know? And now that I thinkabout it, the fact that my father worked there for so many years, I'm.convinced that contributed to his heart attack and his decune inhealth.31

Joe Marino began working at the foundry when he was sixteen. His first contactwith the foundry was as a member of their ball team (Marina is now a member ofthe Geneva Sports Hall of Fame), He worked for the company for 331/2 years,retiring in 1977. His first job was as a cor±-maker, "It's like making a loaf ofbread. The ordy thing is you use sand,oil and some binder, mixed with waterand you bake them just like a loaf of bread and they put them in the mold.Wherever the core was set, it'll just form an opering into the metal." The binder

-25

Theworkers,however,didnotdependsolelyonthegoodwillof theowners. The union provided a measure Of protection. It began to raise concernsabouthealthandsafety,but,observesMarino,"thosedays,itisn'tlikefoday~theunion tells you what to do. Years ago, the urdon representative, weld come in fora hittle raise. h those days, if we got a nickel, we Were lucky. cud then we wentfor benefits." Marino was never on strike and there were rarely lay-a.ff§. DuringtheDepression,however,everyonewouldworkathreeorfourdayweek,elindnating the need for layoffs and providing all the workers with at least someincome for their fandlies.36

To Marina, like many workers, the union provided a measure ofprotection. "if there was anything to gain by it, they would come here and say,`'now you can get this," or 'You can get that." and maybe we wouldn't get what

we asked for, but we probably got part of it." The urtion helped insure a peusion.Many Genevans, both union members and not, have some degree of discondortwith` the national uulons, Berg, a union member hinself, reflects that view:

Feey¥:°=o]:=chn:VBauTfr;eth8ocon:;t¥£tti£:re}fne`G{edn°e:':,a|¥;:e#'with them very much. ` .I worked with this friend of mine who wasa union steward. in fact, Wimam Brennan, Sr.none time we lookedfor a nickel and hour raise, it was in the fall, and he said, '1 can'tgive it to you now, but 1`11 ten you what 1'11 do. I will give you a .' nickel per hour as a bonus at Christmas time." We agree.d withthat, that was fine. Everything was all set.' Wen, that was all right'til it came time they paid us. They gave us the checks and they putit down as a bonus, it wasn't, wages. So this friend of mine and Iwent in to see Mr. Brennan and sit down and taut this thing over,

-i and afe=;e we got through he says, 'You know, fellas, that's whythey put erasers on pencils. I'm sorry. I can see your point andWe're going to fix that." That was the kind of man he was.37

Herendeer. Manufacturing Company

F.A. Herendeen himself was from a boiler manufacturing family. The HerendeenManufacturing Company produced Furman boilers and radiators, invented byFrederick I. Furman of Geneva (1853-1930), I.Iis irmovatior\ was the developmentof a cast iron vertical tubular boiler--an idea borrowed from the quick s teaming

11

4ZfiinGENEVA HISTORICAL SOCHTY

543 South Main Street, Cet`eva, New York 14+56-3194Phone (315}?89-5151 Faj{ (SIS)?89-0314

prepared February 19. 1997

Geneva Foundry Site HistoryA Geneva Foundry booklet notes its I)eginrings on the present site in 1868, as the CatchpoleBoiler Works. This refers to the Catchpole Works on Exchange Street. .The present Site wasactually residential until between 1884 and 189o when a small "Pattern and Expedment Shop" isshown in the sane building once occupied by a Methodist School. (Sanbom hrsurance Maps 1884and 1890). By 1897, a foundry has been added and the business identified as Catchpole & Co.The site enlarged gradually , and became the Geneva Foundry Carp. when purchased in 1921 byWjl]iam J. Brerman, Sr. The foundry was destroyed by fire in the early ]940's and replaced withthe present masonry and steel structure covering over 80,000 square feet (rzre Geriev4 Fo##dryCoxpar¢fJ.on, booklet) This enlarged facility expanded into areas once occupied by the OntarioCoal Co. and the Beard Coal Co. to the west of the former complex. The Ontario site formerlyhad a grain elevator. The industrial development of the site was influenced by the construction ofthe Syracuse & Rochester Railroad in 1841, which borders the site. This RR became part of theNew Yafk Central system. For 8 detailed description of the Geneva Foundry operation, seeenclosed photocopy of promotional booklet.

Mat.ket Basket Corp. Siteln1892,theBuffaloExtensionoftheLehighValleyRailroadwiascompleted.':Thiswasthecatalyst for the industrial development of the northern end of town. This area was parceled ol]tand marketed by the TolTey Park Land Co. in 1891. When Geneva t]ecame .a City in 1897, the .corporate limits of the city were extended to the north to en6ompass this area. The l91S Sanbominsurance map shows the Geneva Cutlery Co *(organized in 1900) occupying the block borderedby Lehigh, Gates, Ontario and Aveoue E. Nothing is shorn for the block to the north, and theGeneva Glass Plant** (established 1909) is to the north of that. By 1925, Market Basket.Carp.buildings occupy half of the block on the Gates Avenue side. In May of 1931, Market BasketCarp. aunounced the purchase of the old Geneva Glass Co. property at Avenue F and LehighStreets. The Corporation moved its headquarters to the Gates site in April of I 955] a year beforeoperations were halted in 1956. The site was sold at public auction in April of 1962, and thetransfer to William Yalden was made in September of that year. He reportedly plamed to open agelatin & frozen foods plant, but thereis no evidence that he ever.did. In.the 1965 Geneva CityDirectory, there is a listing for Great Eastern Co., a storage warehouse. This disappears from thedirectories after that until 1975, when Old Town tool rental appears. Yalden was murdered in1985-6, and had been operatirig Old Town Rentals. He also rented out space for paint booths fordo-it-your-self auto bo dy repair.

*manufacturer of straight edge shaving razors* *manufacturcr ofglas§ bot€]es

Prott¢y. Chew Musct{m, Rose Hi.!! Ma"jon. Wgat;cr 7i!€ Mtdewm (.n ihe John johoton Hottse

APPENIK 16

iJ-i±H±,iz'

I,F'B

:-i-i;I

•.:RE

L= '-.-`\

=*,...

!S,-¢i,,, I_

. -~ fry ...--

iII!ri!D•b;.IiI-I.id,!1!:I!H:,Ii-II.,Ì

• , '...qi.. =r=.+*. i:*.?.i,.=.=...:?;<.T....:.:.`:-Z.L..`'-@±:.I.....,....```'.`...ii.ii=......--`..........`,.....- '..-.,`.-..```.-`;'.-•-,.-- •.=..:i.i-...,i.,-jii::;.`.`jE±ERE..-..i=,'-.-.?.1..'-''```-`_._.._..,_-€__-_

S|. .. ..; ``.. . . .- ...:. .. . ` ...,...I....-.-\_,.,-f£..Li:.:....i.i..-i¥1=.:.:...,,•....;`,-..;.`:`::i......`•,,o •',,,..-.--....

. :..-':-.i.-.''-' . ..': -i . :.s. .. .. . . . -... .... , .,.-....,. ......!;.!i..;':?`.J..a,I-I..;,,¥,.-,-J--I--.,•-.i~£5fGi5fS#3zE:fee•.,,,•,_i.I'+.1I . .v ...15=T57-I,\.±±±±3==-1-,--.-

•,

•.,.,,.®`.

._ . ''E'K'*fo ;..a....-., .. . .`. -. ` ....:.-.:.-.--`=innd:iii...'..-.:....iGS¢È=4bof....5.-

-• =- .`. ..•.-.'i = ";14;i,.# .,. . . . I -•.--..I....., ,..i.:.......;.:`?.;.;;ii€!,i,,....I.

I:..iF-.`::`....:..f.:.=iT:i,.-`...:.•'........+,.g:..S..--.i..'..,.`,`.....:....',,.-_-.,i` -`#!l:-h=,=-:I.i:-;;*,;::=a,--: 4•....-',..`=i. S`...,-..

.`-.-al..`*±RE38gRE#.,.

S . .<. `t¥.Ec.ffi5*f.i¥§ife¥,¥H„%¥{.i..g..,.

i,i.. '`.-..:''.-.--a..L=i;i.:ji-'.`-..i...`:-....:`.

- .,a . -a#lL*.i.1-==ny¥.i.i--....--.•.....-=.T.----.-EE-- -.. -|+e•-I....al:TL¥• .--. .-.-."'<i---i-.`=-'.!=,tttj:\'€-a

5grJ. -:.•_ .. - . . . ; ?.i.i.i...i...aJ- - 11

`//-/..-^-`..--.---.-`¥T]atà- - .--.;'.:.:-:if.#p£?!gRE

I.`-:,I

.tL- . .. - 0 - . a.."¥--iS§-¢`--*iI •....--..-.:,.r-.-...i'.-...:3:i¥!?.i- .---:-I ... . .-..EE..g±::.::`¥F....."`,.•.-:..i?..I ::: I...::. :-I.t.£=3.,.I:i:==.I,- •,,...;-gs.."'i.:.g= .J'

- ' ..'...-*'f . .,,.rri .--....:...:.`,.:3:..\Slg,3

¥'>;!,.-..i. .'.-. `.'*-.. .........I:i::I

......-J=¥.--.`--`. . -. .. ----; Pe. .ii-j&?:i;:

i . ;:I.. I:< • .i-..a.`±j'i£.£=±? `,jiL=T

'-I,----,-, -.-, ' .. . ai_'gop:..:..-...?.:i.i:.;::¥

• . +. . rrb. , . .......,,....`..i..1.,.e...--

•.. ' .. ;.`. . ..?-.i *T .`.-`.I.-.--...'`-..-..-...~.-.`tsds:ir'''1=1 :.?c<-`¢#:L`;.?a-=i.;-`,•.. . .•,.i?J?`,-~,,

I

.. . I &_`-...--ID2S,a

RE& a :.I. ..I:k/L--+ . :` u.I i ...ìsT.3`+\ I..k&./.ln.fir.:„OteL .. . .I . - I I .i -. -+LI.-Ct=sl lfJJ'

-L,, .i , a ..-. ..:--.:;I-:.-.I-.:.' I -._a-,.;'`.-€.S,...`-¥...,..-.-... •-^P-./I/_-/_`:•.I:_-`j'i-:i-.`8eN##€=.I._` I....-.-......:`.=T.........`.....--.--.---..

•ti c±:±if.I i. -I-.1 . p>iTT:=iii:riii--:..-. . . `..- ..aiL`= b3j I..-|{ :.E±3/ .]T-1 ` -+=±::;I`....-` . : .-.I..-.-.tar.-.-.'-.-':

•\`.0--. ., ` •|`.`.,rì-L| . , `-I.. I -.~,,,,-* \ I,Ird*u `zti|@ff . / Fg/ J.:/n / tq : /.` .} .i `1.`±++.!.....-:~:.:/i:-..-`l:±n``:`r#ff/©/ffi.+,`T±:~`-fS&

=. . `` +_ ,z§G;a*+=`ry./RI-. . Ia.

vwh/i _ :,```._ -qp 85ag`l:£.. I-`, ,I ed` rdri;...I`, I . r. •.,~\...a',.

-,. io. I bj.i:-.``H ~ Ldii ì . I. . ```.+rii:i \•.,.

.•...a...,.i.-`..-18..-

`-.` . =+++.•.```4..+`~f*`c,,..`,--.........,...'-....'.. ('.,ItyN`Se` +:` - .¥Ì` a+=_+:;I`.ì_

=T..d¢-.I•.., `:.i-._._:.-:@

``.`..........,.....--;.-..i?-.*.`+A..--..... .' ` ... . ' . .. *£;i,-i:ii-#`HiE_-. . =. -. --. --i-T!--.-.-.-.. a...==. :-:.-==-:==.:!`g,=..::.a-.i;¥i=--..-.,..I-------I-rr--.iJ~--. I__. . dr `---.

'ELz-a

site investigation report and remedial alternatives …

Documents