single undulator test status/plans april 06
DESCRIPTION
Single Undulator Test Status/Plans April 06. Geoff Pile. Revisiting the Goals of the Single Undulator Test. Provide critical input to the S/M system design reviews. Help to determine whether the support/mover system design is ready for final production. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Single Undulator Test Status/Plans
April 06
Geoff Pile
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Revisiting the Goals of the Single Undulator Test
Provide critical input to the S/M system design reviews.
Help to determine whether the support/mover system design is ready for final production.
Measurement of girder and rollaway motions
Determine precision and reproducibility of motions, including start and stop
Check for interference
Measure vibration damping or (hopefully not) amplification.
Measure position stability and temperature dependence of components and subcomponents.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Extract From LCLS Single Undulator Test Plan
The first two weeks of the test shall be called “Short Term Tests” and there will be an additional 6-8 weeks for the “Additional testing and Evaluation Period”.
The Short Term tests will be dedicated to gathering enough information to prove the prototype components and use that information to assist in the final design reviews and procurement of production components.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Integration at ANL
We know the SUT is the most crucial point for engineering integration in the Undulator design at ANL. Our workforce is interactive, focused and very enthusiastic about finding and solving integration issues. It’s been tough to keep up with the schedule but we’re still on track!
Formal Planning and Scheduling – 1 x weekUpdate MS project – progress chase components – review effects
Formal “On The Job” planning and scheduling – 5 x weekReview today’s work – coordinate/plan tomorrow’s day
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Integration with SLAC
SUT Collaboration ANL/SLAC
At least five SLAC engineers have been identified to collaborate during the SUT. Hydro Leveling System and Wire Position Monitor systems
It is anticipated that dummy/prototype equipment will be fitted to the SUT during the middle of May 06. SLAC design – integrated at ANL.
Alignment Activities Responsible collaborators are Horst Friedsam and Catherine LeCocq.
Magnetic Measurements No significant magnetic measurements are planned but magnetic testing of the 1st Article Undulator magnet(s) are being performed in the same magnet measurement facility (MM1) in parallel with the SUT tests. Zak Wolf and Isaac Wasserman
Production Planning and SchedulingAssembly processes – lessons learned from the SUT - GP and Rodd Pope
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
The Current SUT Plan and Schedule is Available on ANL LCLS Project page
ANL LCLS Homepage
Single Undulator Test Information
LCLS Single Undulator Test Plan
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
SUT Milestones (planned in early March 06)
Name Finish Date
Detailed SUT test plan complete Fri 3/17/06
SUT Assembly Complete Fri 5/5/06
Magnet System testing complete Wed 5/3/06
Support System testing complete Mon 5/1/06
Vacuum System testing complete Fri 5/19/06
Diagnostic System testing complete Fri 5/5/06
Control System testing complete Tue 6/13/06
Alignment System testing complete Thu 6/1/06
SUT Complete 6/13/06
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Progress so Far April 06 (SUT Complete 6/13/06)
Detailed SUT test plan complete: Completed 3/17/06 Fri 3/17/06
SUT Assembly Complete: OK - but no WPM or HLS expected until mid May
Fri 5/5/06
*Magnet System: Quad/stand & dummy Undulator installed, replacement testing now – good results
Wed 5/3/06
Support System: installed, testing now – good results Mon 5/1/06
Vacuum System: Ready –still in pre alignment –support installed and aligned
Fri 5/19/06
Diagnostic System: Components available for installation now
Fri 5/5/06
* Control System : Support Mover & X translation installed. Wiring issues and a “Stop work order”
Tue 6/13/06
Alignment System testing complete: Target to Fit up WPM & HLS ersatz by mid May – Thermal and Vibration tests in last few weeks of SUT.
Thu 6/1/06
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
The Quad Support Stand
The stage is designed to fit in the quad footprint, has an overall height of 113 mm and can carry a 50 kg loadAdjusts in X and Y directions and has been designed to be able to position Quad to <5 microns.
Lower knob adjusts XUpper knob adjusts Y
Initial thermal and Vibration tests are planned this week. Need to test with new dummy Quad later.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Quad support Testing in the Lab
Horizontal travel is plus & minus 4 mm Vertical travel is plus & minus 2.6 mm Resolution: 3 microns is easily achievable, 2 microns requires more precise adjustment for the both of the motions. We plan to repeat all these tests using a Keyence system with the resolution up to 0.05 microns on the SUT.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Information provided by Jeff Collins
SUT Undulator Segment Replacement Testing
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
SUT Undulator Segment Replacement TestingBackground:
• The Magnetic Axis of each Undulator Segment is Fiducialized to a Fixed Horizontal and Vertical Dimension using Shim Plates Underneath and on the Ends of the Undulator Support Plates in order to make all Undulator Segments Identical and Interchangeable.
• When Referenced to the Undulator Alignment Pins on the Stage Transition Plates, Undulator Segments can be Interchanged Without the need for Realignment.
• The Total Tolerance Budget Mandates that this Process Must be Repeatable to within 180 µm rms Horizontally and 70 µm rms Vertically* (Robert Ruland’s 7/7/05 Presentation “Alignment Considerations”)
• In Reality, the Process Needs to be Repeatable to within a Percentage of this Tolerance to Allow for Additional Tolerance Stack Up elsewhere.
Purpose:
• Using only One Undulator Segment, Determine the Positioning Repeatability at Both End of the Undulator after Removal and Reinstallation.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Threaded Stud Guides
Undulator Support Plate
Stage Transition Plate
Undulator Alignment Pins
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Testing Method:
• Four Keyence Sensors were used to Measure the X and Y Displacement at Both Ends of the Undulator Relative to the Girder.
• A Laser Tracker Network was Established using Numerous Monuments around the Undulator System and Numerous Monuments on the Undulator and on the Girder.
• Positions were Zeroed, and the Undulator was Unbolted and Removed from the Stages using our Lifting and Positioning Fixtures.
• The Weight of the Undulator is Removed from the Girder using a Forklift.
• The Undulator is then Captured by the Lifting Fixtures and Brought back Down onto the Stages.
• Bolts are Retightened using a Torque Wrench and then the Final Positions are Noted from the Keyence Sensors and Compared with the Laser Tracker System Results.
• This Method was Repeated 6 Times for a Good Statistical Average.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Keyence Sensor Locations:
Xupstream : Upstream End of Undulator, Horizontal MeasurementYupstream : Upstream End of Undulator, Vertical MeasurementXdownstream : Downstream End of Undulator, Horizontal MeasurementYdownstream : Downstream End of Undulator, Vertical Measurement
Laser Tracker Monuments:
UX : Upstream End of Undulator on the Outboard SideUY : Uptream End of Undulator on the TopDX : Downstream End of Undulator on the Outboard SideDY : Downstream End of Undulator on the TopG1 : Upstream Outboard Corner of the GirderG2 : Downstream Outboard Corner of the GirderG3 : Inboard Center of the Girder
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
UX
UY
G1
DYDX
G2
Lifting/Positioning Fixture
Xupstream
Yupstream
Xdownstream
Ydownstream
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Zero Position
(µm)
Final Position
(µm)
Change In Position (µm)
XUpstream 0.01 21.63 21.62
YUpstream 0.03 -2.48 -2.51
XDownstream 0.03 12.63 12.60
YDownstream 0.03 2.47 2.44
∆Z
(µm)
∆Y
(µm)
∆X
(µm)
UX 819 -16 26.2
UY 789 -27 25.4
DX 831 -26 -28.9
DY 791 -45 -31.3
G1 -162 -12 28.5
G2 154 -27 -34.1
G3 66 -32 -30
Laser Tracker Data:
Keyence Sensor Data:
Trial #1
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Zero Position
(µm)
Final Position
(µm)
Change In Position (µm)
XUpstream 0.04 -2.78 -2.82
YUpstream 0.01 1.60 1.59
XDownstream -0.08 2.14 2.06
YDownstream 0.03 3.63 3.60
∆Z
(µm)
∆Y
(µm)
∆X
(µm)
UX -181 -2 -1
UY -164 -1 9
DX -186 45 -7
DY -172 14 12
G1 -24 6 1
G2 -23 41 8
G3 -3 33 16
Laser Tracker Data:
Keyence Sensor Data:
Trial #2
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Zero Position
(µm)
Final Position
(µm)
Change In Position (µm)
XUpstream 0.03 15.31 15.28
YUpstream 0.04 -2.74 -2.78
XDownstream 0.01 11.63 11.62
YDownstream 0.01 -4.11 -4.12
∆Z
(µm)
∆Y
(µm)
∆X
(µm)
UX -468 -20 14
UY -491 -29 18
DX -447 -71 35
DY -527 -36 6
G1 13 -4 -10
G2 21 -50 -1
G3 -3 33 16
Laser Tracker Data:
Keyence Sensor Data:
Trial #3
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Zero Position
(µm)
Final Position
(µm)
Change In Position (µm)
XUpstream 0.02 -23.71 -23.69
YUpstream -0.03 7.30 7.27
XDownstream 0.01 18.71 18.70
YDownstream -0.02 2.93 2.91
∆Z
(µm)
∆Y
(µm)
∆X
(µm)
UX 268 -5 -36
UY 308 -18 -36
DX 294 29 6
DY 284 7 10
G1 -31 -31 -6
G2 46 6 -13
G3 30 8 -19
Laser Tracker Data:
Keyence Sensor Data:
Trial #4
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Zero Position
(µm)
Final Position
(µm)
Change In Position (µm)
XUpstream 0.06 31.51 31.45
YUpstream 0.01 -3.23 -3.24
XDownstream -0.02 -18.09 -18.11
YDownstream -0.06 0.18 0.24
∆Z
(µm)
∆Y
(µm)
∆X
(µm)
UX 101 -3 21
UY 74 -1 36
DX 83 -8 -17
DY 98 26 5
G1 16 15 -3
G2 3 10 8
G3 7 -2 7
Laser Tracker Data:
Keyence Sensor Data:
Trial #5
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Zero Position
(µm)
Final Position
(µm)
Change In Position (µm)
XUpstream -0.01 -4.72 -4.73
YUpstream 0.06 -.02 -0.08
XDownstream -0.06 15.19 15.25
YDownstream -0.03 1.03 1.06
∆Z
(µm)
∆Y
(µm)
∆X
(µm)
UX 5 6 32
UY 7 15 32
DX -26 -24 28
DY -18 -42 37
G1 N/A N/A N/A
G2 N/A N/A N/A
G3 N/A N/A N/A
Laser Tracker Data:
Keyence Sensor Data:
Trial #6
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Conclusions:
• The Process of Replacing an Undulator Segment is Quick and Easy Using the Lifting and Positioning Fixtures.
• The Process is Very Accurate and Repeatable.
• The Worst Case Repeatability for Vertical Alignment is Less than 10 Microns.
• The Worst Case Repeatability for Horizontal Alignment is Less than 40 Microns.
• The Laser Tracker Network Established around the SUT Provides Excellent Results that are in Good Agreement with the Keyence Sensor
Measurements.
• The Laser Tracker Network will be Used Throughout SUT Testing to Provide a Secondary Set of Measurements for Comparison to The Keyence
Sensors and Positioning Potentiometers.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
“Stop Work Order” Control System - X translation stage
At approximately 10:30am on 4/05/06 we had mechanical failures of both of the Undulator "X" translation stages. The stages were damaged due to software/operator set point errors that allowed the stages to dislodge their end stop plates. The failures have been reported to APS and SLAC management, safety officials and Tom Barsz (QA ).
The minimum corrective action will be: (written 4/05/06)
No ANL/LCLS support mover system motor (connected to the SUT) is to be operated until further notice.*
The system will modified and then re-inspected for functionality and safety. The minimum modifications and re-commissioning procedure will be as follows:
1. Addition of Software P.V. limits, fully wired limit switches and hard stops will be installed.
2. All component cabling will be re-inspected for completeness, damage, connection quality and workmanship.
3. A test procedure for functionality checkout will be generated. ( A check off commissioning list)
4. An APS group peer review of the safety associated with the SUT,for controls and support mover system, will be held.
5 Approval from the ANL LCLS director to re-start commissioning.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
“Stop Work Order” Control System - X translation Still in effect 4/20/06
Root Cause: Unplanned work, perceived schedule pressure.Lessons Learned: Not enough ISM. We speak it, write it, but don’t do enough of it.Had positive Safety reviews with management and peers.Scheduled “SMART Training” for LCLS Supervisors.LCLS Controls group assigns wireman and designer to SUT project to enhance quality and safety.
Currently wiring and testing the positioning - potentiometers, additional limit switches and integrating Emergency Off push buttons into power circuits.Need to install hard stops and test software modifications – expect to rescind “Stop Work” 4/24/06Has slowed us down (but in parallel with other design issues) – May have lost a few days in the schedule?
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
Additional SUT Construction pictures
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
“Long Term Tests”
In parallel with the SUT- a completely separate “Long Term Test" (Drawings of the long-term test layout) facility is just getting underway. Half of the existing APS EAA RF area has be designated for this work. To start with the system will be constructed with prototype undulator components which will be subsequently swapped out for production components as they become available. The test area will have a full scale, twenty foot long, half-section mock tunnel. The undulator components will be located in exactly the same proximities as they will be located in SLAC’s U.H. Tunnel. It is expected that this facility will remain in place through the LCLS commissioning stages.
Geoff Pile
FAC: SUT Status & Plans [email protected]
20th/ 21st April 06
“Long Term Tests”
Mock Tunnel design completed. (very Simple)
Unistrut tunnel components delivered to EAA.
Area preparation started – Preliminary tunnel construction starts next week.
LTT will utilize MM1 (2nd) girder, support stands and the Metalex 1st article undulator.
Motion Controls and alignment testing moves to “Long Term Tests” end of June as SUT is dismantled.
Planning and Scheduling the usage of the Long Term Test facility will be phased in as SUT nears completion