simulating the blister tap hole concept design

21
SIMULATING THE BLISTER TAP HOLE CONCEPT DESIGN USING CHT CAPABILITIES IN STAR-CCM+ V5.02.009 Bateman Engineering Projects, Pyro Technologies, SA 2011 STAR European Conference: 22 & 23 March, Netherlands

Upload: goran-vukovic

Post on 05-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 1/21

SIMULATING THE BLISTER TAP HOLE CONCEPT DESIGNUSING CHT CAPABILITIES IN STAR-CCM+ V5.02.009 

Bateman Engineering Projects, Pyro Technologies, SA

2011 STAR European Conference: 22 & 23 March, Netherlands

Page 2: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 2/21

www.Bateman.com

CONTENTS

•  Current Blister Tap Hole:

•  Numerical CFD Models (x4).

•  Conclusions.

•  Bull Nose Blister Tap Hole:

•  Numerical CFD Models (x3).

• 

Conclusions.

Page 3: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 3/21

www.Bateman.com

Current SiC insert blister tap hole configuration

(oxygen fuel burner effect included).

1.  Steady state simulation – clay in tap hole with the Oxygen Fuel

Burner (OFB) off. Results not shown. Aim: Establish the initial

conditions for the subsequent transient runs.

2.  Transient simulation – clay in tap hole with the OFB on (duration =

37 minutes). Determine the OFB heat flux required to incite the 6thermocouple positions to correspond with the measured thermo-

couple values (benchmark).

3.  Transient simulation – blister flowing in tap hole with the OFB on

(duration = 62 minutes). Simulate the transient tapping process to

correspond with measured thermocouple values / trends.

4.  Transient simulation – clay in tap hole with the OFB off (duration =

62 minutes). Simulate the cool-down cycle after transient tapping

to correspond with measured thermocouple values / trends.

Page 4: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 4/21

www.Bateman.com

Current Blister Tap Hole – Thermocouple Positions

Page 5: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 5/21

www.Bateman.com

Clay in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB on @ 34.8 kW/m²)

T1T2

T3T4

T5T6

Page 6: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 6/21

www.Bateman.com

Clay in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB on @ 34.8 kW/m²)

Page 7: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 7/21

www.Bateman.com

Blister in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB on @ 34.8 kW/m²)

Page 8: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 8/21

www.Bateman.com

Blister in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB on @ 34.8 kW/m²)

Page 9: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 9/21

www.Bateman.com

Clay in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB off)

Page 10: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 10/21

www.Bateman.com

Clay in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB off)

Page 11: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 11/21

www.Bateman.com

BTH7 – Summary of OFB on / OFB off conditions

•  Measured- & predicted CFD temperaturevalues at the end of each transient cycle:

Measured vs.

Predicted

T1

[° C]

T2

[° C]

T3

[° C]

T4

[° C]

T5

[° C]

T6

[° C]

T/C (clay & OFB on) 242.3 91.3 50.5 43.4 47.7 64.7

CFD (clay & OFB on) 242.5 142.0 98.9 81.2 78.4 89.8

T/C (blister & OFB on) 990.3 882.2 825.3 801.4 745.0 798.8

CFD (blister & OFB on) 961.7 911.3 963.9 971.1 906.3 923.8

T/C (clay & OFB off) 399.4 431.8 438.9 478.8 460.9 529.6

CFD (clay & OFB off) 355.7 389.8 426.5 446.0 451.8 463.9

Page 12: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 12/21

www.Bateman.com

Current Blister Tap Hole – Conclusions

•  Differences in measured vs. predicted values attributed to:

•  Thermocouple positions & measurements maybe not exactly thesame in the SiC insert (on-site vs. models).

•  Temperature CFD results are higher due to constant thermal materialproperties in all directions (isotropic).

•  Thermal resistances between region interfaces not incorporated inthe numerical models (conjugate heat transfer).

•  However: Trends of graphs predicted more or less correctly for eachtransient stage.

•  Next step: Apply oxygen fuel burner boundary condition to the newbull nose blister tap hole concept. Predict thermal behaviour beforeactual installation earlier this year (March 2011).

Page 13: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 13/21

www.Bateman.com

Bull Nose High Alumina insert blister tap hole configuration

(oxygen fuel burner effect included).

1.  Steady state simulation – clay in tap hole with the OFB off (results

not shown). Establish the initial conditions for the subsequent

transient runs.

2.  Transient simulation – blister flowing in tap hole with the OFB on

(duration = 62 minutes). Simulate the transient tapping process to

determine the increase in the maximum monitored SG Iron bull

nose- & steel can temperatures.

3.  Transient simulation – clay in tap hole with the OFB off (duration =

62 minutes). Simulate the cool-down cycle after transient tapping

to determine the decrease in the maximum monitored SG Iron bull

nose- & steel can temperatures.

Page 14: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 14/21

www.Bateman.com

Blister in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB on @ 34.8 kW/m²)

Page 15: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 15/21

www.Bateman.com

Blister in Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB on @ 34.8 kW/m²)

SG Iron Bull Nose

Steel Frame & Can

Page 16: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 16/21

www.Bateman.com

Clay in the Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB off)

Page 17: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 17/21

www.Bateman.com

Clay in the Tap Hole – Temperature (OFB off)

SG Iron Bull Nose

Steel Frame & Can

Page 18: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 18/21

www.Bateman.com

BTH8 – Summary of OFB on / OFB off conditions

•  Predicted CFD temperature values at the endof each transient cycle:

Maximum Temperatures for: SG Iron

[° C]

Steel Can

[° C]

High

 Alumina

[° C]

CFD (blister & OFB on) 483.5 386.1 1394.2

CFD (clay & OFB off) 242.2 362.4 502.8

Page 19: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 19/21

www.Bateman.com

Bull Nose Blister Tap Hole – Conclusions

•  Maximum monitored temperature value in the SG Iron bull nose withthe OFB on just short of 500 °C after an hour of blister tapping withconstant heat flux = 34.8 kW/m² on the front face.

•  Maximum monitored temperature value in the steel can hot facetapered tip just short of 390 °C after an hour of blister tapping(Thermal cycling / induced stresses not investigated).

•  Front of the High Alumina insert much hotter with the OFB on, albeitonly locally around the tap hole exit.

•  All the regions monitored (SG Iron, Steel & High Alumina) heat-upduring the tapping cycle within acceptable operating limits.

•  Cool-down cycle with the clay plug; after an hour the SG Iron cooleddown to halve the maximum value when the OFB was on. The SteelCan cooled down by 24 °C, which is less sensitive to either tappingor plugged conditions.

Page 20: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 20/21

www.Bateman.com

QUESTIONS?

Page 21: Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

7/31/2019 Simulating the Blister Tap Hole Concept Design

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/simulating-the-blister-tap-hole-concept-design 21/21

www.Bateman.com