simulating dynamical features of escape panic
DESCRIPTION
Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic. Dirk Helbing, Illés Farkas, and Tamás Vicsek Alex Turek. Stampedes. People trying to move faster than normal Physical interactions between people Uncoordinated passing of bottlenecks Arching/clogging at exits - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic
Dirk Helbing, Illés Farkas, and Tamás Vicsek
Alex Turek
Stampedes
• People trying to move faster than normal• Physical interactions between people• Uncoordinated passing of bottlenecks• Arching/clogging at exits• Dangerous pressures within jammed
crowd (up to 4,450 N/m)
Stampedes (cont’d)
• Injured/fallen people turn into obstacles• Tendency of “mass behavior,” i.e. herd
instinct• Alternative exits are overlooked or
underused
Studying Stampedes
• Mostly social psychology (mentality of herd behavior)
• Helbing et al. attempted to model them using self-driven particle systems
• Combine socio-psychological and physical forces
A Single Particle
Affected by multiple forces:Desired Velocity and associated acceleration
Interaction forces
Desired Velocity ForceHelbing et al. specified these parameters:
vi0 (Desired velocity)
• 0.6 m/s – Relaxed• 1.0 m/s – Normal• 1.5 m/s – Nervous• >1.5 m/s – Panic (transition to uncoordinated
bottleneck behavior)
Interaction Forces
• Psychological desire to have room between you and another person
• Psychological desire to not be too close to the walls
F
F
Interaction Forces
• Body force – counteracting body compression
• Sliding friction force – counteracting movement tangential to something you’re in contact with
F
F F
Measured Effects: Transition to uncoordination due to clogging
Arch-like bunching, with avalanche effect when arches break (demo)
• Attempting to have too high a vi0
• High interpersonal friction becoming the dominant force at a bottleneck
• Buildup of forces causing extremely high pressures, and injuries (demo)
• Asymmetrical columns can improve outflow and prevent buildup of fatal pressures (demo)
Measured Effects: Faster-is-Slower Effect
• Jamming can occur at widening of escape routes (demo)
Measured Effects: Faster-is-Slower Effect
• Individualism vs. Herd behavior• Each pedestrian may either select individual
direction, follow avg. direction of his neighbors in a certain radius, or a mixture of both, weighted by panic parameter pi. (demo)
Measured Effects: Mass Behavior
Desired direction at time t
• Both have drawbacks:– All individualistic means no one will learn from anyone
else (demo)– All herding means no exploration for other exits
(demo)
Measured Effects: Mass Behavior
Measured DataLeaving time vs. Desired
velocity
Measured DataLeaving time for 80 people, given
different combinations of individualistic and herding behavior
Questions?
Cited Paper:Helbing, Farkas, Vicsek.
“Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic”. 2000
http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/~lboloni/Teaching/EEL6938_2007/papers/Helbing-EscapePanic.pdf
Presentation by Alex Turek