simplified workflow and improved confidence in screening ... · ms. e ⇒ hdms. e ms. e – high...
TRANSCRIPT
©2016 Waters Corporation 1
Simplified Workflow and Improved Confidence in Screening Methods on Time of
Flight Mass Spectrometry
Steve Preece MS Business Manager
Waters Wilmslow
©2016 Waters Corporation 2
Overview
Use of high resolution MS (Q-Tof) for suspect screening
Key criteria for identification
Case study with Xevo G2-XS QTof
What else can I do with the data?
Using ion mobility MS for screening
©2016 Waters Corporation 3
Advantages of accurate mass screening? Over recent years high resolution mass spectrometry has gained in popularity as
a screening tool in the food and environmental sector Ability to perform non-targeted analysis
• The freedom to measure compounds without prior compound specific tuning
Ability to perform full spectral analysis • Providing greater insight into the composition of a complex sample
Ability to perform historical (retrospective) data review • The capability of performing structural elucidations of unknowns or suspected compounds
Ability to screen for larger number of compounds and adducts
• Compared to QqQ based screening Increased specificity & selectivity in complex matrices
• Sensitivity in line with Regulations. Accurate mass, diagnostic fragment ions…
“HRMS strongly competes with classical tandem mass spectrometry in the field of quantitative multiresidue methods (e.g., pesticides and veterinary drugs). It is one of the most promising
tools when moving towards nontargeted approaches...” Kaufman A., Anal BioAnal Chem 2011 Dec 17
©2016 Waters Corporation 4
HRMS UNIFI Screening Key Benefits
Are these compounds in my sample?
Screening
Scientific Library RT, MW, Structure, Fragments & CCS
Workflows Simplify data review
How much is in my sample?
Quantitation
Quan/Qual Workflow MSE Single Analysis
Alternately Tof MRM Ultimate Sensitivity
What else is in my sample?
Elucidation
Discovery Tools Anything Interesting? Elucidation tools
Identify what is interesting
What is the difference between my sample and another one?
Comparison
Binary Compare/Multivariant Analysis Statistical Comparison of Samples
©2016 Waters Corporation 5
Atrazine: TQ
216.1 > 174.1
216.1 > 96.1
Identification from RT and ion ratios
©2016 Waters Corporation 6
Advantages of Non-Target ToF Screening over MRM Target Screening
MRM #1
MRM #2
MRM #3
MRM #4
MRM #5
MRM #6
MRM #7
©2016 Waters Corporation 7
Accurate Mass Screening
Acquiring full MS spectral data – See ‘everything’ unlike specific MRM acquisition
Using 20mDa extraction window for mass chromatograms
– Specificity from accurate mass data
Acquiring MSE data – Molecular weight and fragment data from the same run
Using multiple data features to confirm or identify – Accurate mass, retention time, fragments, adducts, isotopes
©2016 Waters Corporation 8
Xevo G2-XS QTof : MSE
MSE
– High and low energy spectra – Precursor and fragment ions – Single acquisition – Data independent acquisition
Data automatically aligned – Requires partial LC peak resolution – Links associated precursors and fragments
©2016 Waters Corporation 10
Mass accuracy alone …
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
5ppm 3ppm 1ppm
272
151
48
Number of Identified Pesticides (mass accuracy alone)
…. provides insufficient specificity
©2016 Waters Corporation 11
Retention time…..
…. helps reduce false detects
1 min window - better than 1ppm + reduced risk of false negatives
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
± 0.25 min ± 0.4 min ± 0.5 min no Rt
9 15 20
272
Number of Identified Pesticides (using Rt and m/z (5ppm))
±0.1 min
©2016 Waters Corporation 12
Fragment ions
0
1
2
3
4
5
± 0.25 min ± 0.4 min ± 0.5 min no Rt
2 2 2
5
Number of Identified Pesticides (Rt, m/z and at least 1 fragment)
…. provide additional specificity
©2016 Waters Corporation 14
UNIFI: Raw data is processed once Tabulated in oracle database Data is componentised
– Spectral features are already associated – Background ions are excluded
Extracted Spectrum
Component Spectrum
©2016 Waters Corporation 15
Real Life Example: XEVO G2 XS
(strawberry pomace)
Pesticide Screening Application Solution using Xevo G2-XS QTof
Sample supplied as extracted by the customer
Sample information – approx 20 compounds >10 ppb – approx 10 compounds < 10ppb
What else can you see?
Identified, at least 1 fragment ion Identified, no fragment ion(s)
©2016 Waters Corporation 16
Non-Targeted Screening with Xevo G2-XS QTof
Higher instrument sensitivity means : – Lower screening detection limits – Better confidence in data – Better isotope match scores – Better ability to detect adducts – Greater ability to detect fragments
More pesticides being detected…
…and they are now being detected with fragments – Fragments are considered to be confirmatory – Other MS information is used as additional evidence
©2016 Waters Corporation 17
Example 3: Non targeted Screening
January 2014 – Analysis of more samples requested (
Sample information
– approx 20 compounds >10 ppb – approx 10 compounds < 10ppb
What else can you see?
(strawberry pomace)
Are these compounds in my sample?
Screening
How much is in my sample?
Quantitation
What else is in my sample?
Elucidation
What is the difference between my sample and another one?
Comparison
©2016 Waters Corporation 18
Region of interest Red = Blank/Reference Blue = Unknown Green = Difference
Qualitative Screening: Binary Compare Spinach
©2016 Waters Corporation 19
Highlight Masses of Interest Send to Batch Elucidation Tool
Reference sample
Control sample
Qualitative Screening: Binary Compare Spinach
©2016 Waters Corporation 21
Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
Why ion mobility for complex samples?
How does it work? – Orthogonal separations – Calculation of collision cross section
What effect does it have on analyses? – Drug metabolism data – Pesticide screening data
©2016 Waters Corporation 22
Ion Mobility Spectrometry LC-IMS-MS
IMS provides greater peak capacity than LC-MS alone – Reveals compounds that would have been missed – Provides greater coverage for sample profiling
IMS generates cleaner data – Removes background ions from spectra – Allows easier and faster data interpretation
IMS reduces errors in compound confirmation – Additional collision cross section (CCS) information – Reduces false positives and negatives for screening
©2016 Waters Corporation 23
The Basic Principal
Ions are driven through a tube by an electric field – Velocity of ions is determined by mass and charge
Motion of the ions is resisted by a drift gas – Resistance is determined by size (mass) and shape of the ion
Ions are separated based on their charge, mass and shape
With chromatography and MS, this provides additional separation power
N2
©2016 Waters Corporation 25
IMS drift time ⇒ CCS Additional identification point Matrix independent System independent
The ability to see more Resolution of isomers Cleaner spectra
IMS
Orthogonal Separation Collision Cross Section
©2016 Waters Corporation 26
What is CCS?
Important differentiating characteristic of an ion
— Chemical structure (mass, size)
— Dimensional information (shape)
Precise physicochemical property of an ion
©2016 Waters Corporation 27
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Acet
amip
ridAz
oxys
trob
inBr
omuc
onaz
ole
IICa
rbet
amid
eCa
rbof
uran
Chlo
rbro
mur
onCh
lorid
azon
(Pyr
azon
)Cl
etho
dim
ICl
etho
dim
Ifgt
Clet
hodi
mII
Clet
hodi
mII
fgt
Cyro
maz
ine
DEET
Dem
eton
-S-m
ethy
l-sul
fone
Dich
lorv
osDi
etho
fenc
arb
fgt
Disu
lfoto
n-su
lfone
Diur
onEt
hopr
opho
sFe
nam
ipho
ssul
phon
eFe
noxy
carb
Feno
xyca
rbfg
tFe
npro
pim
orph
Fenp
yrox
imat
Flut
riafo
lFo
rmet
anat
eFo
sthi
azat
eFu
rath
ioca
rbHe
pten
opho
sHe
xazin
one
Indo
xaca
rb
Isoxa
ben
Linu
ron
Mes
otrio
neM
etal
axyl
Met
habe
nzth
iazu
ron
Met
obro
mur
onM
etol
achl
orM
etrib
uzin
Mev
inph
ostr
ans
Nite
npyr
amO
xadi
azon
peth
oxam
idph
enth
oate
Pirim
icar
bPr
imic
arb-
desm
ethy
lfgt
*Pr
opam
ocar
bpr
opar
gite
Pros
ulfo
carb
Pym
etro
zine
Pyra
clos
trob
inPy
ridab
enPy
ridab
enfg
t1Py
ridat
ePy
ripro
xife
nSi
maz
ine
Spin
osad
Spiro
dicl
ofen
Spiro
xam
ine
IITe
buco
nazo
lete
pral
oxyd
imTh
iacl
oprid
Thio
dica
rbTh
ioph
anat
e-m
ethy
lTr
iasu
lfuro
nTr
iflum
uron
Trin
exap
ac-e
thyl
Triti
cona
zole
Vam
idot
hion
% C
CS D
iffer
ence
Axis Title
Synapt WIV ISP/Vion IMS Q ToF Comparison April 2015
Pesticide
WIV ISP Study: SYNAPT/Vion Comparison for Pesticides
• Consistent CCS values • Different instruments in different countries
©2016 Waters Corporation 28
MSE ⇒ HDMSE
MSE
– High and low energy spectra – Precursor and fragment ions – Single acquisition – Data independent acquisition
Data automatically aligned – Requires partial LC peak resolution – Links associated precursors and fragments
HDMSE
– IMS separation in front of MSE
– Can separate ions that co-elute in LC – Cleaner spectra due to mobility resolution
©2016 Waters Corporation 29
Spectral Cleanup Pentanochlor at 1 µg.kg-1
courtesy of Dr. Jens Luetjohann, GALAB, Germany, 2015
©2016 Waters Corporation 30
Screening
Detection of low level compounds in complex samples – Requirement for efficient separation – Need not to miss peaks
Confident confirmation of presence or absence of targets – No false negatives – No false positives
Identification Points -Exact mass -Retention time -Fragment ions -Isotope peaks
Matrix and system dependent
Can be lost near limit of detection
Increased likelihood of false positives with large library
Use additional identifier - CCS
©2016 Waters Corporation 31
Mandarin EU PT Sample
29 Observed using a “wide screen”
8 Expected to be detected
©2016 Waters Corporation 32
Results summary for EU RL proficiency sample FV-13
9 observed after 10ppm accurate mass and fragment filtering
8 Expected to be detected
False +ve
False -ve
8 observed with 2% CCS filter
©2016 Waters Corporation 33
Vion and UNIFI: Providing routine ion mobility
• Just press START
• Simply Acquire
• Get to the Answers
Seamlessly from sample to answers
©2016 Waters Corporation 34
UNIFI screening workflow for Vion
courtesy of Dr. Jens Luetjohann, GALAB, Germany, 2015
1.4 -0.03
©2016 Waters Corporation 35
UNIFI screening workflow for Vion
courtesy of Dr. Jens Luetjohann, GALAB, Germany, 2015
©2016 Waters Corporation 36
Sensitivity: 0.001 mg/kg pentanochlor in tomato extract
HDMSE
courtesy of Dr. Jens Luetjohann, GALAB, Germany, 2015
©2016 Waters Corporation 37
Conclusions
Targeted, suspect and unknown screening require sensitivity and selectivity for successful outcomes – Xevo G2-XS QTof
Data processing and review have evolved
– Beyond 2D extracted ion chromatograms – Using all of the data for confirmation
CCS adds another dimension for separation and identification
– Matrix and system independent – Additional confidence in decisions