silica vs. ps np etching rates
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Qualitative Analysis: SiO2 and Polystyrene
NP Etching Using Lactic Acid
Ann Meek | Sarin Parikh |Suranjan Oruganti
![Page 2: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Shout Out
Dr. Esener,
Negin M., Yasan Y., and Mukanth V.
2
![Page 3: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
OutlineI. IntroductionII. Objective and BackgroundIII. ProcedureIV. ResultsV. DiscussionVI. Conclusion
3
![Page 4: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Motivation
4
“Convincing the macrophages that the nanoparticles were part of the body and shouldn’t be cleared.”
To the left: A peptide “passport” attached to nanoparticles tells macrophages “Don’t eat me” (credit:: Mary Leonard, Biomedical Art & Design)
![Page 5: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Introduction
5
To engineer quasi-molecular complexes for
highly specialized delivery, it is essential to understand
endocytosis (right): the mechanism by which a cell internalizes a vesicle from
its’ surroundings.
Melis Çağdaş, Ali Demir Sezer and Seyda Bucak (2014). Liposomes as Potential Drug Carrier Systems for Drug Delivery, Application of Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, PhD.
Ali Demir Sezer (Ed.),
![Page 6: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Objective
The goal of this experiment is to qualitatively assess the etching characteristics of a nanoparticle in an endosomal
environment.
6
![Page 7: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Why Silica & Lactic Acid?• The material must be versatile in its surface functionality, size-
modulation and porosity. Biological-relevant functionality include: favoring colloidal stability, long-time blood circulation. The evaluation of silica-based nanoparticles as drug carriers has become very popular among the last 5 years or so (Slowing et al. 2008; Di Pasqua et al. 2008; Rosenholm et al. 2010).
• Late endosomes contain lactic acid of pH 4.5-5.5 and could melt away the thin silica shell.
7
![Page 8: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Effects of nanoparticles on the body
8
Flow-chart to the left: Klara Slezakova, Simone Morais and Maria do Carmo Pereira (2013). Atmospheric Nanoparticles and Their Impacts on Public Health, Current Topics in Public Health, Dr. Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales (Ed.),
![Page 9: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Procedure
9
![Page 10: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Procedure
I. Coating with TMOS and APTMSII. WashingIII. CalcinatingIV. Sealing with PLLV. EtchingVI. Analyzing
10
![Page 11: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
I. Coating with TMOS and APTMS
• Polystyrene beads were mixed with 2 samples of ethanol, APTMS and TMOS were mixed in a solution with the beads and sonicated.
11Jung, Hak-Sung, Doo-Sik Moon, and Jin-Kyu Lee. "Quantitative Analysis and Efficient Surface Modification of Silica Nanoparticles." Journal of Nanomaterials 2012 (2012): 1-8. Web.
TMOS
![Page 12: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
II. Wash• The samples were washed using ethanol • Centrifuged at 4000 RPM, 20 °C for 10 min• Extra liquid was pipetted out
12
![Page 13: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
III. Calcinate• Sample particles mixed with ethanol
and sonicated• Placed on 4 glass slides for 12 hours
at 480 °C• Slide washed once with ethanol and
3x with water and emptied into respective vials
• 3 solutions created with lactic acid at pH 2.1, 4.5, 6.9.
13
Void
Polystyrene
Calcinated
Non-Calcinated
![Page 14: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Before & After Calcination
Réfega, Ricardo. "Nanoparticles in Biomedical Imaging." Fundamental Biomedical Technologies (2008): Web.14
![Page 15: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
IV. Seal with PLL
• Silicic acid added to PLL to seal particles overnight.
1515
Void
Polystyrene
Calcinated
Non-Calcinated
![Page 16: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SEM of Nanoparticles
Calcinated Non-Calcinated
16
![Page 17: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
V. Etching• 26 solutions were created using a lactic acid
solution and 37°C bath
17
![Page 18: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
![Page 19: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
VI. Analysis Each sample placed on siliconwafer for analysis under SEM.
19
![Page 20: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ResultsDLS
SEM
IMAGE J
20
![Page 21: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DLS DataNon-calcinated Calcinated
21
![Page 22: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Results Calcinated at pH 4.5
22
10 min 1 hr
6 hr Overnight
![Page 23: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results Non-Calcinated at pH 4.5
23
10 min
6 hr Overnight
1 hr
![Page 24: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Results Calcinated at pH 2.1
24
1 hr
Overnight
![Page 25: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Results Non-Calcinated at pH 2.1
25
1 hr
Overnight
![Page 26: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Results Calcinated at pH 6.9
26overnight
1 hr
![Page 27: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Results Non-Calcinated at pH 6.9
27
1 hr
Overnight
![Page 28: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
To Summarize
28
![Page 29: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Discussion
● PLL protected the silica!● From our results, we gathered that the PLL barrier prevented
the silica from etching.
29
![Page 30: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Room For Improvment
- Washing: the etching is pH sensitive. - Use Dye as maker: For noncalcinated particles we can use
fluorescent dye in the NP that are released upon rupture. Then use UV-Vis.
- Preventing colloidal aggregation
30
![Page 31: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Sources of Error
- TMOS and APTMS added in separate vials- Image J was used for analysis
31
![Page 32: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Conclusion and Thoughts ● It must be noted that agglomerate forms of nanoparticles
might interact differently in a system than in single form.● To keep the nanoparticles in monodispersed suspension,
coatings must be applied● PLL can be used as a protector from etchants● Longer circulating pattern for NP coated with PLL and PEG
32
![Page 33: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Thank You- Dr. Esener, - (Dr. Tao, Dr. Sirbuly, Dr. Luo, Dr. Horvath).- Negin M., Yasan Y., and Mukanth V.- Thank you audience for listening
33
![Page 34: Silica vs. PS NP etching rates](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022070514/587cc4d71a28abfa018b4d5d/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Questions?
34