siena college division of student life · siena college division of student life ... (kpi) for the...
TRANSCRIPT
Siena College Division of Student Life Fall 2015 Key Performance Indicators
““WWee AArree SSttuuddeenntt LLiiffee””
Siena College Division of Student Life
Key Performance Indicators Fall 2015
The Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for the Division of Student Life are meant to show the breadth and depth of activity within the departments reporting to the Vice President for Student Life. The KPI’s highlight trends and progress that will guide continuous improvement and strategic decision-making within our division. This effort is a supplement to assessment activities which focus on student learning outcomes.
Our plan is to provide this information each semester and to refine the metrics as we determine what it most useful for us to use in conjunction with assessment results. We welcome your feedback as this project takes greater shape.
Sincerely,
Maryellen Gilroy, Ed.D. Vice President for Student Life
6.27.9 9.1
12
3.6 3.1 3 2
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Staffing / Intake Wait Time
Average wait time (days) to schedule intake
# of CCSD staff
21341774
1589
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
# of Appointments
# of Appointments
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Client Treatment History-Prior to CCSD
Interaction
Outpatient Intensive Outpatient
Inpatient None
Center for Counseling and Student Development
Schools Staff to Student Ratio
Staff & Trainee to Student Ratio
Four year private University (2500-5000 students)
3.08 3.74
Four year private college (2500-5000) students
2.77 3.47
Four year public college 3.38 4.42
Art school 5.7 7.7
Siena College 3 3
The intake wait time is calculated by the scheduling program used at the CCSD. It is an underestimate of the actual wait time. The reason for this is if a student comes in for an urgent appointment and has not been seen yet that semester, the system counts that as an “intake”.
• ½ time psychologist position was cut in the spring of 2013 resulting in a decline in appointments for the fall 2013 through spring 2014.
• In spring 2014 – psychiatric nurse hours were reduced in half • In December 2014- psychiatric nurse position eliminated.
34.70%
32.50%
33.20%
8.50%
9.10%
9.10%
46.60%
48.20%
47.60%
2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3
2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4
2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5
Cl ient Se l f -Repor ted Medica t ion Usage
Currently
Past
*None
20.70%
23.00%
24.10%
29.50%
36.20%
40.60%
2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3
2 0 1 3 - 2 0 1 4
2 0 1 4 - 2 0 1 5
Client Suicidal IdeationStudents with Current Suicidal Ideation Students with a History of Suidical Ideation
*Students on Medication- nationally, about 25% of students are on medications. At our center it’s 33%.
*The data shows that the average counseling center has 18% of their students reporting suicidal ideation. At our center, it’s 24%
ACCUD data on staff to student ratios regarding mental health services for schools services *We have an average staff size for the size of our school, through private colleges tend to be slightly understaffed in general compared to similar size schools of a different type. If you look at staff + trainees, we are under staffed relative to the national average at private colleges (because we do not have a training program).
LD, 36
ADHD, 34Mobility, 2
Visual, 2
Psychological, 18
Speech, 4
TBI, 3
Orthopedic, 3
Other Health, 9
% Disability Breakdown2015-2016 AY
LD
ADHD
Mobility
Visual
Psychological
Speech
TBI
Orthopedic
Other Health
8
12
7
4
Self-Advocacy Scale Scores
25-27 (poor)
28-29 (needsimprovement)
30-32 (competent)
33-35 (excellent)
95 100112
129
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16(to date)
Number of Disabled StudentsUsing Services
Avg Registered
Services for Student with Disabilities
The office also provides service to a small number of students who do not complete the registration process and/or on a temporary basis (e.g. broken arm, concussion)
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the percentage of students with disabilities enrolling in college has risen to 11% and will continue to climb. Similarly, Siena College has seen a 25% increase in disabled students registering for services from fall 2010-fall 2015. This increase, along with students’ expectation of more individualized service, has led to a demand for increased staffing and expanded facilities in the near future.
Scale Score Summary:
In 2014-15 AY registered students were asked to complete an internally developed scale to measure their competency with self-advocacy. The target score for “passing” was 30 out of 40.
31 students completed the instrument.
39 % of respondents achieved a “passing” grade
Lowest score was 25, highest 35.
This represents an area of needed improvement for the office. Self-advocacy is the primary learning outcome for the Services for Students with Disabilities Office so resources will need to be devoted to implementing services and learning opportunities in this area.
Summary:
Siena’s percentage of students with disabilities continues to hold steady though total disabled students seeking services continue to climb as the overall number of students with disabilities in college continues to rise.
Student satisfaction with services and accommodations continues to remain high though lower satisfaction is reported specifically with the physical space of the office (lower Foy Hall) and the availability of 1-1 assistance.
An increasing number of students are coming to Siena with highly complicated disability related needs. For instance, the percentage of students registered for accommodations related to psychological disorders (ex: anxiety, depressions, OCD) has increased from 13% in 2008 to 18% in 2015.
Average GPA of current class of students with disabilities: 2.82 (Siena overall 3.10)
Average Retention Rate of students with disabilities: 89% (Siena overall 89.8%)
The percentage of students who are regular or occasional users of accommodations has increased from 59% in 2013-14 to 68% in 2014-15 primarily through direct outreach to students. Goal is 70%.
The number of exams administered (proctored) by the office has increased from 657 in 2013-14 to 830 in 2014-15. This represents a 21% increase compared to the 9% increase in accommodation usage stated above.
*13% of 129 registered students have multiple
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Student Veteran Enrollment
Vet Dependents*
Vets (inc Natl Guard)
*Includesstudents who are using parent's veteran benefits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
PriorityRegistration Vets Lounge
Vets EmailsVets Office
VetsLuncheon Vets Dinner
Ranking of Services for Student Veterans
1 (mostimportant)2
3
4
5
6 (leastimportant)
Veterans Services
Fast Facts: Avg. GPA of Veterans= 3.1 All branches of the military are represented in the current class. Assessment Summary:
• 90% of student veteran respondents ranked accessing support services at Siena easy or doable with help.
• 90% of student veteran respondents felt Siena supported them academically.
• 80% of student veteran respondents felt that Siena supported them emotionally.
Challenges:
• Small population so it’s difficult to form a collective veterans’ community. Efforts to counter this include gathering spaces for student vets (lounge) social opportunities for all Siena vets including faculty and staff (luncheons and vets dinner) as well as a newly initiated veteran mentoring program for new veteran students.
• No formal recruitment plan for this population.
At the conclusion of the 2013-14 AY and again for 2014-15, student veterans were asked to rank from 1 (most important) to 6 (least important) the services offered by the Veterans Office. They are in order by the cumulative ranking received.
2741
2228*2012
1761**
2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015
Health Services Student Visits
Student visits
Triage calls
37%
27%
26%
6% 4%
Top 5 Reasons for Student Visitsin 2014
Sick Visit
Urgent Care
Nursing Triage
Preventative/TBScreening
Medication Pick-up
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2013(n =642) 2014(n=447)
Siena College Health Survey Results
Heath Sevices is a campus resource
Would contact Health Services for a health issue
28 117
13 104
4 610
2128
10
16
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2012 2013 2014
Special Accommodation Requests due to a Medical Condition
Special Housing
Air Conditioning
Meal Plan Waiver
Parking Permit
Request for Release from Housing
Health Services
2014-2015 Highlights:
Secure a Software contract with PyraMED for implementation of a patient appointment scheduling system and Electronic Health Record in compliance with the NYSDOH electronic prescribing mandate.
Developed a Travel Health program consistent with CDC travel health immunization practice guidelines and American College Health Association recommendations (2013/2014)
Enhanced the Travel health program to include a 2 step ppd testing for students traveling to high risk destinations consistent with CDC Travel recommendations (2014/2015)
Achieved 100% compliance for NY State Immunization Public Health Law for ten consecutive years (2006-2015). NYSDOH conducted an On-site audit on 10/30/14. All standards of care were met with no issues identified.
*Health Services contract was revised to include a reduction in staffing resulting in less provider appointments for students due to budgetary constraints. **Health Services began tracking more specific triage data as a result of less provider appointments available to students.
We continue to see an increase in requests for special accommodations due to the increase in medical complexity of the students in the college setting.
3.14
4.844.35
4.844.43
5.03 4.8 5.07
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
InternetConnectivity
Timeliness ofRepairs
Laundry Facilities Flexibility ofroom change
policy
Areas for Growth
2014
2011
Community Living
Residence Hall Occupancy Semester Occupied Beds Maximum Occupancy Percent Occupied Fall 2015 2401 2454 97.8% Fall 2014 2434 2488 97.8% Fall 2013 2441 2502 97.6%
Overall Satisfaction
5.425.7 5.94
5.23 5.35.77
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Overall Satisfaction withResidence Life
Residence Life hascontributed to my
learning
Would recommend livingon campus to a new
student
Satisfaction with Community Living
2014
2011
The Association of College and University Housing Officers International Resident Assessment is administered at Siena every three years to all residential students in early November. We continue to see growth in overall satisfaction, contributions to learning, and willingness to recommend living on campus to new students. Score is based on a 1-7 scale with 1 being strongly disagree and 7 being strongly agree. (N=1550).
Community Living staff has noted some areas of increased dissatisfaction since the 2011 administration of the ACUHO-I Resident Assessment. Four main areas are noted in the graph to the right. Community Living staff has shared this data with campus partners (Information Technology Services, Facilities Management, etc) to address these concerns to improve the student experience in the residence halls. (N=1550). Historically, these concerns have remained the same since we first began administering the ACUHO-I survey in 2001.
Strategic Planning Beginning in fall 2014, a group of students, staff, and administrators from across campus began meeting to explore ways to diversify Siena’s housing stock and to improve student satisfaction. This group thought about strategic options to provide new options for students to respond to student needs and to improve satisfaction with housing options for residential students. As a result of this group’s work, Community Living was able to implement the following new features/offerings for the 2015-2016 academic year:
• Single-occupancy rooms to 22 students (10 men and 12 women) as a pilot program. • Two new lounges (one social, one study) in Ryan Hall, a first-year student residence hall • One new social lounge in Plassmann Hall, a mixed first-year and sophomore residence hall
Student Involvement & Leadership Activities
The First-year Leadership Institute (FLI), Exploring Campus Engagement & Leadership (EXCEL), and Future Leaders in Student Affairs (FLSA) are signature leadership programs housed in the Office of Community Living for students who express interest in developing leadership skills and career exploration. Resident Assistants, Residence Hall Association, and Hall Councils provide year-long leadership and programming opportunities geared towards other residential students.
Community Living cont.
Comparative Satisfaction
Activity Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015
Resident Assistants (includes alternates)
83 72 82 75 76
First-year Leadership Institute (FLI)
18 15 17 12 20
Exploring Campus Engagement & Leadership (EXCEL)
23 27 22 24 N/A (Program undergoing changes)
Future Leaders in Student Affairs (FLSA)
4 5 6 5 8
Residence Hall Association Executive Board
10 12 12 11 11
Residence Hall Councils 14 16 20 17 18
“Select 6” included: Iona College, Fordham University, St. John Fisher College, Seton Hall University, College of the Holy Cross and Loyola Chicago. Survey results show that we are ahead of our peers in several areas, but need to focus on improvements to our facilities and services provided to students (dining services, wireless internet, etc). These remain priority items for the Community Living staff to advocate for moving forward.
(Temperature, Bathrooms, Common Spaces & Lounges, Layouts, Repairs)
(See Areas for Growth Chart)
69.4%
70.0%
66.4%
65.0%
66.4%
63.1%
50.0% 55.0% 60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0%
The staff involved demonstrateda satisfactory level of concern
The staff involved demonstratedprofessional conduct
The staff involved were helpful inaddressing or resolving the issue
EBI/ACUHO Resident Assessment Survey
2011
2014
85.4%
92.0%
91.2%
87.9%
82.2%
87.4%
88.3%
84.7%
60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0%
Security of possessions in room
How safe you feel in room
How safe you feel in residence hall
How safe you feel walking on campus at night
EBI/ACUHO Resident Assessment Survey
2011
2014
86.4%
81.5%
82.2%
91.0%
84.0%
79.4%
60.0% 65.0% 70.0% 75.0% 80.0% 85.0% 90.0% 95.0%
The campus is safe and secure for all students.
Parking lots are well-lighted and secure.
Security staff respond quickly in emergencies.
Noel Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory
2011
2014
Public Safety
The two charts (above and right) shows the percentage of students who expressed satisfaction with campus safety and security on the EBI/ACUHO Resident Assessment Survey. (The percentages show the percent of students who responded with a rating of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point satisfaction scale.) To the question: “During my interaction(s) with the Department of Public Safety:” the following responses were provided. The chart below shows the percentage of students who expressed satisfaction with campus safety and security on the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory. (The percentages show the percent of students who responded with a rating of 5, 6, or 7 on a 7-point satisfaction scale.)
Public Safety cont.
CRIME STATISTICS FOR 2012, 2013 and 2014 The crime statistics are reported for a calendar year, not an academic year.
Siena College Clery Crime Statistics OFFENSE (Reported by Hierarchy)
On‐Campus In Residence Halls Non‐Campus Public Property Unfounded Crimes
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Murder/Non‐ Negligent Manslaughter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Negligent Manslaughter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rape 7 6 11 5 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fondling 0 0 0 0 0
Incest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Statutory Rape 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aggravated Assault
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Burglary 10 3 9 10 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Motor Vehicle Theft
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Liquor Law Arrests
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Drug Law Arrests 7 5 4 6 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Weapons Law Arrests
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Liquor Law Violations ‐ Disciplinary Referrals
789
730
568
724
623
530
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Drug Law Violations ‐ Disciplinary Referrals
112
104
96
90
82
84
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Weapons Law Violations ‐ Disciplinary Referrals
3
7
2
3
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 OFFENSE (Not Reported by Hierarchy)
On‐Campus In Residence Halls Non‐Campus Public Property Unfounded Crimes
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Domestic Violence
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dating Violence 3 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Stalking 3 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
“In Residence Halls” crime statistics are a subset of the On Campus category, i.e. they are counted in both categories.
Domestic Violence, Dating Violence and Stalking were new requirements starting with 2013.
Forcible and Non‐Forcible Sex Offenses were changed in 2014 to Rape, Fondling, Incest and Statutory Rape.
Institutions are required to publish the number of “Unfounded Crimes” beginning with the calendar year 2015 crime statistics. Siena College has elected to voluntarily report this information for the 2014 crime statistics.
• 82% of students are involved in at least one
student organization, while about 62% are involved in two or more
• With the addition of Casey’s Lounge, the Paddock, Welcome Desk and new appearance of the atrium, the Sarazen Student Union is the hub of student life at Siena.
• The ACUHO-EBI Student Activities survey is
administered in the spring of ’11, ’13 and ’15. The overall performance in 2015 for Student Activities was quite high and students gave high ratings for learning outcomes related to their experiences at Siena.
16%
37%15%
8%
24%
82 Clubs & OrganizationsClub Composition
Club sports Academic Affinity/Cultural Performance Service
7266 64
79 8178
9491 93
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Are You satisfied with Student ActivitiesOffered here?
Are You Satisfied with StudentOrganizations Offered Here
Would You Recommend Joining StudentOrganizations
Overall Evaluation of Student Activities
2011
2013
2015
Student Activities and Leadership Development
Engagement
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Average number of attendees at Student Activities events 98 165 171 Total Student Clubs & Organizations 65 76 82 Total Students Active in Student Clubs & Organizations 1,778 1925 2,040 Total Number of attendees at Family Weekend 600 1600 2100 Overall Student Satisfaction with Orientation 68% 71% 78%
Student Activities and Leadership Development cont.
Areas for Growth
Event Ideas: Work to include more well-rounded events for students including additional off campus activities, activism events, and cultural events.
Student Government- SGA can improve on their outreach with the Student Body in making a better effort to seek their opinions and concerns. One area of concern is the awareness of election timelines so everyone has an equal opportunity to run for open positions; suggestions include a newsletter so the students know what the groups are working on, the progress they are making, and where they can address their concerns.
Marketing of Events: Utilize one location on our website that lists all events including club meetings. Looking into new ways to promote events and improve dialogue with students through social media, online forums/comments, and texting services.
The number of clubs on campus has increased by 30% over the last three years. Additionally we are seeing an increase request for club sports teams in the last 8 months. The student activities fee has remained at $250 for the last 8 years with a proposal on the table for a $35 increase in 2016 to fund the increase in club request. This request will provide an additional $100,000 for clubs & club sports funding.
Students in Leadership Positions 2013 2014 2015
Clubs 260 288 320
Organizations & Class Councils 60 60 63
Student Activities Positions (Marketing Interns, Welcome Desk & Building Captains
15 19 23
Orientation Leaders 67 70 72
Total: 402 437 478
90% of students stated attending programs helped them learn to challenge other’s abusive use of stereotypes. 89% of students stated attending programs increased their interaction with people different from themselves.
The ACUHO-EBI survey is administered in the spring of ’11, ’13 and ’15. The overall performance in 2015 for Student Activities was quite high and students gave high ratings for learning outcomes related to their experiences at Siena
45
90120
75
150
210
0
50
100
150
200
250
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Bowman Center Residential Hall Student Attendance
02468
10121416
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Bowman Center Residential Hall Programs
93% 92% 87%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Spring 2011 (n=287) Spring 2013 (n=465) Spring 2015 (n=436)
*Source: ACUHO-EBI Student Activities Survey, 2011, 2013, 2015
Students strongly agree or agree that the Sr. Thea BowmanCenter for Women raises awareness of social justice issues(i.e., fair trade, dating violence, and breast cancer),particularly those affecting women.
Sr. Thea Bowman Center for Women
The Sister Thea Bowman Center for Women’s vision is to be a leader in providing innovative, value-based programs and initiatives that educate, engage and empower students – in collaboration with the Siena community – to advocate for social justice, gender equity and women’s development.
Program Committees The Bowman Center reaffirms that women students, and the issues they face, are important to the college and are supported. Programming at the Bowman Center is centered on three programming committees: Health and Wellness Committee; Peace and Non-Violence Committee; and Global Action Committee.
Bowman Center Program Attendance (approximate student, faculty, staff and community attendance)
Week without Violence (Fall 2015) 200
Donut Dollies in Vietnam (Fall 2015) 100
St. Clare Leadership Lecture Series: Ours to Do Women Leading the Way (Spring 2015)
70
LUNAFEST (Spring 2015) 100
Human Trafficking Featured Speaker (2015) 150
Fair Trade Colleges and Universities Conference (Spring 2015)
75
Signature Programs The Bowman Center sponsors a service trip, travel course and educational immersion trip to provide students with the opportunity to extend their learning regarding gender equality, social justice and women’s development.
Dominican Republic Service Trip – Dominican Republic.
Gender Equality in the Nordic Countries Course - Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and Finland.
Border Awareness Experience in the Southwest (BAE) - New Mexico.
92% 92%83%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Spring 2011 (n=287) Spring 2013 (n=465) Spring 2015 (n=436)
*Source: ACUHO-EBI Student Activities Survey, 2011, 2013, 2015
Students strongly agree or agree that the Sr. TheaBowman Center for Women provides opportunities toparticipate in programs for service and advocacy onsocial justice (i.e., fair trade, dating violence, and breastcancer).
Sr. Thea Bowman Center for Woman cont.
Social Media The Bowman Center has an active Facebook presence to connect with students, faculty, staff and community members. The Bowman Center posts at least every other day, frequently twice a day. These posts range from notifying about upcoming Bowman Center events, reporting on successful events, and posts shared from Facebook about body image, sexual assault, gender equality and the workplace. On average, each Bowman Center post reaches 743 people. In March 2015, Bowman Center reached its highest reach of 2,457 persons.
Bowman Leaders The Bowman Leaders are a core group students who provide programming over a range of issues, such as sexual violence, relationships, positive body images, cat-calling, fair trade and sexual harassment. The number of residential hall programs provided by the Bowman Leaders has increased to an average of seven programs per semester. Since 2011, the Bowman Center has posted at least two stall stories each semester in the residence hall restrooms and academic buildings reaching almost 100% of students with anti-violence programming messages. The Bowman Leaders lead monthly tabling activities to the campus population focusing on Anti-Violence in the fall and Anti-Human Trafficking in the spring.
202
172
261
263
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100%
Spring 2013 (n=463)
Spring 2015 (n=435)
*Source: ACUHO-EBI Student Activities Survey, 2013, 2015
Since entering Siena have you participated in anactivity or event sponsored by the Sr. Thea BowmanCenter for Women? (Cinderella Project, fair tradechocolate tasting, speakers, etc.)
YES
NO
*ACUHO-EBI Student Activities Survey is designed to determine the level of satisfaction of college students with student activities and their student life experiences.
307
609691
0
200
400
600
800
2012 2013 2014
Diversity Training Participation
Participants AttendingDiversity Training
7146
0
252
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2011 2012 2013** 2014
Ally Training Attendance
ParticipantsAttending AllyTraining
Damietta Cross Cultural Center
Damietta Cross-Cultural Center fosters campus-wide, cross-cultural competency in order to advance Siena’s commitment to building a world that is more just, peaceable and humane. Damietta Cross-Cultural Center offers educational, cultural and fun activities for campus. Events include guest lectures, cross-cultural workshops, heritage month celebrations and performances.
Programming
Diversity Training Damietta Cross-Cultural Center provides a variety of diversity training for students and student leaders. Training includes Game of Enlightenment, Taste of Difference, Taboo with a Twist, What Would You Do? Strategies for Promoting an Inclusive Community, and In My Own Voice. All training programs aim to help students gain a better understanding of the importance of being culturally competent; and developing awareness, acceptance, and affirmation for the dignity of each individual from diverse backgrounds.
Ally Training Attendance Damietta Cross-Cultural Center offers Ally Training annually to Siena community members. We incorporate the active bystander model into the Ally Training and give participants concrete skill to serve as ally and advocate for our LGBTQ members.
1778
2106
1600
1800
2000
2200
2013-2014 2014-2015
Student Attendance at Damietta Events
Students AttendingPrograms
Damietta Cross-Cultural Center offered 43 programs in the 2013-2014 academic year and 52 programs in 2014-2015.
99% of Diversity Training participants (n=142) stated that they were able to demonstrate awareness, acceptance, and affirmation for the dignity of each individual from diverse backgrounds.
99% of student leaders (n=145) agreed that being an ally is a Franciscan and Catholic value.
*Sept/Oct 2015: 76 participants
*Sept/Oct 2015: 459 participants
*Sept/Oct 2015: 372 participants
**In 2013, Damietta did not provide Ally Training as the Center used the transitional year to develop an in-house training curriculum.
Damietta Cross Cultural Center cont.
Cross-Cultural Solidarity Experience Part of Siena College’s Strategic Plan 2011-2016, the Cross-Cultural Solidarity Experience program aims to enhance student engagement by providing cross-cultural learning opportunities inside and outside the classroom through cross-cultural solidarity experiences. The Damietta Cross Cultural Center administers and provides logistical support for grants which offer funding for a cultural immersion component for the selected courses. Examples of immersion experiences that have taken place include: trips to Cornell Hip Hop Museum, Buddhist Monastery: Karma Triyana Dharmachakra, Iroquois Indian Museum, United Nations, Museum of Chinese in America, Polynesian Culture Center; exchanges with refugees through community partners; and guest lecturers inside and outside the classroom.
Damietta Student Leaders Damietta Leaders are peer educators who help to deliver key programming to improve diverse students’ experience at the College while continuing educating our non-diverse students about the importance of diversity and cross-cultural competency. Solidarity Advisors are peer advisors who serve as facilitators for class workshops and field/service trip experiences; and they assist faculty in the implementation of field/service trips through the Cross-Cultural Solidarity Experience program.
4 6 5 7 7
187
247238
129
190
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
5
10
15
20
25
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015
Cross-Cutural Solidarity Experience Program
Semester Courses
CCSE Faculty
Student Enrollment
Damietta Student Leaders
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Damietta Leaders 7 7 12 11
Solidarity Advisors 14 18 17 17
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2012-2013 (1298 total) 2013-2014 (1049 total) 2014-2015 (694)
77 64 5155 51 43
546
417
347
620
517
253
Alcohol and Drug Violations -Findings
Drugs-Responsible Drugs-Not Responsible Alcohol-Responsible Alcohol-Not Responsible
Dean of Students
Alcohol and Drug Violations
Sanctions – Multiyear Comparison 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Educational Sanctions 720 573 370
Probation 265 175 109
Housing Relocation 3 14 6
Suspension 2 6 3
Dismissal from Housing 13 11 4
Dismissal from College 2 4 1
Expulsion 1 2 0
Fined 708 505 532
Warnings/Reprimands 1066 982 736
Alcohol policy violations consist of: underage possession, gift/sale/distribution, public intoxication, rapid consumption device, and alcohol disorderly conduct.
Drug policy violations consist of: possession, intended/actual sale or distribution, possession and/or use of prescription drugs, misuse.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015*
Sexual Misconduct Reports
Reports Clery Statistic Timely Warning
20
35
23
0
10
20
30
40
2013-2014 2014-2015 Fall 2015
SCT Referrals
309
108
62
3940
2013-2014 Top 5 Violations
Res. Living Guidelines
Noise
Disruptive Conduct
Property Damage
Non Compliance
300
134
91
75
57
2012-2013 Top 5 Violations
Res. Living Guidelines
Noise
Disruptive Conduct
Property Damage
Non Compliance
67
110
63
25
46
2014-2015 Top 5 Violations
Res. Living Guidelines
Noise
Disruptive Conduct
Property Damage
Non Compliance
Dean of Students cont.
Top 5 violations (other than Alcohol and/or Drug Policy violations)
From the fall 2011 – spring 2015 we have received 48 reports involving sexual misconduct (sexual harassment, sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence and stalking)
18 reports went to a formal resolution process for finding and potential sanctioning. (13 responsible, 5 non responsible). Many reports to not go through a formal resolution process for the following reasons: anonymous reporting, unidentified complainant, unidentified respondent, choice of the reporting party)
Not all reports result in a registering a Clery statistic for the following reasons: the report was not a Clery reportable crime (e.g. Sexual Harassment) or the reported incident did not occur in our Clery geography.
Not all reports require that the College issue a timely warning for the following reasons: the report was not a Clery reportable crime, the reported incident did not occur in our Clery geography, the time lapse between when the incident occurred and when the incident was reported was significant, interim measures were put in place to mitigate ongoing, potential threats to the community, the potential ongoing threat was to a specific individual, not the community.
* 2014 – 2015 is the first year that VAWA required Clery reporting of dating violence (4), domestic violence (0) and stalking (0).
The Student Concerns team is made up of representatives from Student Life, The Chaplain’s Office and Academic Affairs. The team is charged with promoting student health and success by coordinating information and developing support plans for students. The team is focused on prevention and early intervention for students experiencing distress or engaging in harmful or disruptive behaviors.
sienalife123
/sienalife123
@sienalife123