SHREDDED T I R E BURNING T R I A L

AT ST. CONSTANT, KILN #2 -

P R O J E C T E?0.--10009

,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1) Summary

Objectives of the Test

Kiln Particularities at Time of Test

Site Notes

Kiln Stability

Impact on Burninz Zone

Particles Size of Shredded Tires

Insufflation Pipe Position

Burning Zone Position

Equipment

Impact on Environment

Sampling Done During and After Trial

Industrial Grinding of Clinker Produced

Conclusion

Appendices I to VI

I LCL

I

1. SUMMARY

A t h i r d t r i a l of r u b b e r f i r i n g a t S t . C o n s t a n t , K i l n # 2 , w a s c a r r i e d o u t f r o m O c t o b e r 1 8 t o O c t o b e r 2 7 , 1982 . . D u r i n g t h e t e s t , t h e k i l n was f i r e d w i t h n a t u r a l g a s . A s u b s t i t u t i o n o f 30% o f t h e n a t u r a l g a s w i t h s h r e d d e d t i r e s was a c h i e v e d o n a l o n g r u n . The p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e m a t e r i a l h a n d l i n g e q u i p m e n t was v e r y s a t i s f a c t o r y and p e r m i t t e d f a i r l y good k i l n c o n t r o l d u r i n g t h e t r i a l . Samples of r u b b e r u s e d , c l i n k e r p r o d u c e d , as w e l l as s a m p l e s f o r v o l a t i l e r e c i r c u l a t i o n a s s e s s m e n t were s e n t t o B e l l e v i l l e l a b f o r a n a l y s i s . A l s o , a s a m p l e o f t h e p r e c i p i t a t o r d u s t c o l l e c t e d d u r i n g a n d a f t e r r u b b e r f i r i n g was s e n t t o a s p e c i a l i z e d l a b f o r d u s t r e s i s t i v i t y e v a l u a t i o n . The o n l y n e g a t i v e aspect o f t h e t r i a l w a s t h e p r e c i p i t a t o r e f f i c i e n c y wh ich seemed t o d e c r e a s e when r u b b e r was b u r n e d i n t h e k i l n . The r e a s o n s f o r t h i s a r e s t i l l unknown and a re u n d e r s t u d y .

2 .

3 .

OBJECTIVES O F TEST

The f o l l o w i n g were t h e major o b j e c t i v e s of t h e t e s t :

a ) S u b s t i t u t e 3 0 % o f t h e n a t u r a l g a s w i t h s h r e d d e d t i r e s on a l o n g c o n t i n u o u s r u n .

b ) D e t e r m i n e t h e e f f e c t s of s u c h s u b s t i t u t i o n o n t h e k i l n c o n t r o l and o n t h e b u r n i n g zone .

c ) E v a l u a t e e f f i c i e n c y o f t h e s h r e d d e d t i r e h a n d l i n g system.

d ) E v a l u a t e t h e impact of r u b b e r f i r i n g o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t .

e ) Assess t h e q u a l i t y of c l i n k e r and cemen t p r o d u c e d d u r i n g t h e t e s t .

KILN PARTICULARITIES AT TIME OF TEST

The t r i a l e v a l u a t i o n w i l l h a v e t o t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t t h r e e s p e c i f i c p a r t i c u l a r i t i e s t h a t were p r e v a i l i n g on t h e k i l n , before, d u r i n g , and a f t e r t h e t e s t .

a ) The k i l n f e e d i n d i c a t o r was showing 8 3 t / h f o r a gas c o n s u m p t i o n n o r m a l l y c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o a f e e d of 92 t / h . Hence , t h e k i l n f e e d r a t e i n d i c a t i o n is e i t h e r f a l s e or t h e c h a i n s y s t e m o f t h e k i l n is i n v e r y poor c o n d i t i o n . T h i s w i l l have t o be t a k e n i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n i f any spec i f ic h e a t c o n s u m p t i o n c a l c u l a t i o n is t o be made.

3.

P a g e 2

KILI? PARTICULARITIES AT TIME OF TEST ( c o n t ' d )

The water spray r e g u l a t i o n was bad d u r i n g t h e t e s t w i t h flow v a r i a t i o n s up t o 30 l i t e r s c a u s i n g cycles i n t h e k i l n , i n t h e b u r n i n g z o n e (motor KW t r e n d ) , and i n t h e gas flow p a s s i n g t h r o u g h t h e k i l n ( 0 2 l e v e l ) .

The d u s t r e t u r n r a t e f rom t h e p r e c i p i t a t o r w a s n o t r e g u l a r , showing v a r i a t i o n s of 1 8 % o f t h e f u l l sca le o n t h e e l e v a t o r KW w i t h o u t f i r i n g r u b b e r , and 27% when f i r i n g r u b b e r . T h e s e v a r i a t i o n s on t h e d u s t r e t u r n r a t e c a n a l so c a u s e k i l n c y c l i n g .

4 . SITE fJOTES

The i n j e c t i o n of s h r e d d e d t i r e s s t a r t e d o n O c t o b e r 1 8 a t 13:lO e n d i n g on O c t o b e r 27 a t 6:45 A.M. , and c a n be summar ized as follows:

The t o t a l d u r a t i o n of t h e t r i a l was 209 .5 h o u r s .

The t o t a l number of s h u t d o w n s was 2 8 .

The t o t a l downt ime was 33 .15 h o u r s o r 1 5 . 8 % of t h e t o t a l t e s t t i m e .

E l e v e n s h u t d o w n s were c a u s e d b y p r o d u c t i o n problems s u c h a s s l o w s p e e d , k i l n u p s e t , e t c . , fo r a t o t a l of e i g h t e e n hours or 8 . 2 % of t h e t o t a l downt ime .

S e v e n t e e n s h u t d o w n s r e l a t e d to e q u i p m e n t p r o b l e m s fo r a t o t a l of 15.18 h o u r s o r 7 .2% of t h e t o t a l downt ime.

The amount of s h r e d d e d t i r e s b u r n e d was 344.67 t o n n e s

The n a t u r a l gas c o n s u m p t i o n d u r i n g t h e t e s t w a s 942 .103 m 3 .

1 0 , 6 3 5 t o n n e s of c l i n k e r were p r o d u c e d w h i l e f i r i n g rubber . T h i s amount c o u l d be a f f e c t e d by t h e p o s s i b l e error of t h e f e e d r a t e i n d i c a t o r as m e n t i o n e d a b o v e .

4 .

5.

6.

P a g e 3

SITE NOTES ( c o n t ' d )

A l l t h e d e t a i l s o f t h e t r i a l a r e g i v e n on Appendix #1 i n c l u d i n g t h e s p e c i f i c r e a s o n s f o r e a c h s h u t d o w n , and t h e a v e r a g e s e t t i n g o f t h e k i l n parameters d u r i n g t h e t e s t .

K I L N STABILITY

The k i l n s t a b i l i t y was n o t too good d u r i n g t h e t r i a l r e s u l t i n g i n e l e v e n k i l n s lowdowns a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s e v e r a l s t o p p a g e s o f t h e r u b b e r i n j e c t i o n . T h e poor r e g u l a t i o n of t h e water spray s y s t e m seemed t o c o n t r i b u t e l a r g e l y t o t h i s c y c l i n g c o n d i t i o n . On O c t o b e r 2 3 , c h a n g i n g t h e water s p r a y s y s t e m t o manua l mode improved t h e k i l n s t a b i l i t y and t h e oxygen v a r i a t i o n u n t i l Monday m o r n i n g , O c t o b e r 25 . (See t r e n d s on k i l n c h a r t o f O c t o b e r 2 3 , Append ix 11).

C o n s e q u e n t l y , r u b b e r f i r i n g d u r i n g t h e t e s t was n o t t h e main u p s e t t i n g f a c t o r o f t h e k i l n , and seemed t o be q u i t e c o m p a t i b l e w i t h good k i l n s t a b i l i t y .

IMPACT ON BURNI1,lG ZONE

The ma in e f f e c t of i n s u f f l a t i n g s h r e d d e d t i r e s i n t h e b u r n i n g z o n e i s t o c o n c e n t r a t e t h e h e a t where unburned r u b b e r is f a l l i n g i n t o t h e k i l n . T h i s g e n e r a t e s , on 1 0 t o 1 5 f e e t of t h e b u r n i n g z o n e , a h i g h c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f h e a t w h i c h becomes t h e i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r t o be c o n t r o l l e d by t h e k i l n operator .

A too h i g h temperature a t t h i s p o i n t w i l l cause c o a t i n g e r o s i o n , h i g h e r s h e l l t e m p e r a t u r e and on a l o n g e r term c o u l d r e s u l t i n a s h o r t e r b r i c k l i f e , T h i s p rob lem c a n e a s i l y be c o n t r o l l e d , t o a c e r t a i n e x t e n t , by t h e oper- a tors , b u t w i l l l i m i t t h e p e r c e n t o f p o s s i b l e s u b s t i t u - t i o n a n d t h e s i z e of t h e pa r t i c l e s o f t h e s h r e d d e d t ires u s e d .

A s u b s t i t u t i o n o f 3 0 % was a c h i e v e d w i t h o u t p r o b l e m s , m e e t i n g t h e o b j e c t i v e s of t h e t r i a l . A 38% s u b s t i t u t i o n was p l a n n e d b u t u n f o r t u n a t e l y a h i g h s h e l l t e m p e r a t u r e , a r i s i n g t h e n i g h t b e f o r e t h e t e s t w a s t o be d o n e , f o r c e d t h e p r o d u c t i o n Management t o c a n c e l t h e t e s t .

I

I

1 I I i

P a g e 4

7 . PARTICLE S I Z E OF THE SHREDDED TIRES ( c o n t ' d )

The p a r t i c l e s i z e o f t h e s h r e d d e d t i res u s e d is v e r y i m p o r t a n t i n o r d e r t o a v o i d a too h i g h h e a t c o n c e n t r a t i o n o n t h e same s p o t . The p a r t i c l e s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n s h o u l d , a s much as p o s s i b l e , promote i g n i t i o n w h i l e t h e p a r t i c l e s are s t i l l i n s u s p e n s i o n i n t h e g a s stream. O v e r s i z e d pieces e x c e e d i n g 1" s h o u l d be a v o i d e d a s t h e y h a v e t i m e t o f a l l , almost a t t h e same p l a c e , b e f o r e b e i n g i g n i t e d i n t o t h e k i l n .

8. INSUFFLATION P I PE O R 1 ENTAT I O N

The o r i e n t a t i o n and t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e i n s u f f l a t i o n p i p e i s i m p o r t a n t and s h o u l d a i m a t g e t t i n g t h e s h r e d d e d t ires i n c o n t a c t w i t h t h e g a s f l a m e as l o n g as p o s s i b l e . D u r i n g t h e t e s t , t h i s p o s i t i o n was n o t r e a c h e d d u e t o p h y s i c a l c o n s t r a i n t o f t h e e q u i p m e n t l a y o u t . T h i s w i l l be corrected i n t h e f u t u r e . D u r i n g t h e t e s t , t h e r u b b e r s p r a y w a s c u t t i n g t h e f l a m e i n a s l i g h t a n g l e and a b o u t 70% of t h e r u b b e r w a s f a l l i n g on t h e opposi te s i d e o f t h e l o a d b e f o r e b e i n g i g n i t e d . The exac t p o s i t i o n o f t h e i n s u f l a t i o n p i p e is g i v e n o n t h e s k e t c h i n c l u d e d i n Append ix 111.

9 . BURNING ZONE CONTROL

B u r n i n g s h r e d d e d t i res d o e s n o t cause a d d i t i o n a l problems w i t h t h e b u r n i n g z o n e c o n t r o l and t h e k i l n o p e r a t i o n i n g e n e r a l , and i s s u b j e c t o n l y t o t h e f a m i l i a r i z a t i o n o f t h e k i l n operator w i t h t h i s p a r t i c u l a r new process. N e v e r t h e l e s s , s t o p p i n g a n d r e s t a r t i n g t h e r u b b e r f i r i n g u p s e t s t h e b u r n i n g z o n e by s h i f t i n g t h e c l i n k e r i z a t i o n p o i n t u p and down t h e k i l n . A t i r e i n j e c t i o n shu tdown w i l l c a u s e a p u s h o f t h e l o a d , t h e opposite o c c u r r i n g o n a s t a r t - u p p r o c e d u r e ; t h i s is n o t a major p r o b l e m and as t h e opera tors8 e x p e r i e n c e g r o w s , t h i s d i f f i c u l t y w i l l b e e a s i l y h a n d l e d .

10, EQUIPMENT

The mater ia l h a n d l i n g e q u i p m e n t p e r f o r m e d w e l l d u r i n g t h e t e s t c a u s i n g o n l y s e v e n t e e n s h u t d o w n s f o r a t o t a l o f 15.18 h o u r s o r 7.2% of t h e t o t a l d u r a t i o n o f t h e t es t . The weak p o i n t s i n t h e c i r c u i t were t h e f o l l o w i n g :

a ) F r e q u e n t p l u g g i n g o f t h e o u t l e t of b o t h r o t a r y a i r l o c k s .

LCL

10. EQUIPMENT ( c o n t 'd )

P a g e 5

b ) E x t r a c t i o n p r o b l e m s o n t h e ma in h o p p e r a t g r o u n d l e v e l .

c ) The d u s t c o l l e c t i n g s y s t e m o f t h e f e e d e r c h u t e . T h i s system w i l l h a v e to be c h a n g e d c o m p l e t e l y .

N e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e e q u i p m e n t r e s p o n d e d t o t h e p r o c e s s n e e d s d u r i n g t h i s t e s t a n d , w i t h a f e w small improve- m e n t s , w i l l be a d e q u a t e f o r p e r m a n e n t u t i l i z a t i o n .

11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

Rubber b u r n i n g i n t h e k i l n a f f e c t s t h e p r e c i p i t a t o r e f f i - c i e n c y and c h a n g e s t h e s t a b i l i t y o f t h e d u s t r e t u r n i n t o t h e k i l n . V i s i b l e d u s t e m i s s i o n o c c u r s a t t h e s t a c k w h i l e r u b b e r is f i r e d i n t h e k i l n .

D u s t e m i s s i o n t es t s and SO2 s a m p l i n g were made by t h e C.T.S. e n v i r o n m e n t a l team d u r i n g t h e t r i a l . R e s u l t s of t h o s e tests a re n o t known y e t . R e a d i n g s o f t h e elec- t r i c a l r e a c t i o n s o f t h e t r a n s f o r m e r s were t a k e n , a n d r e c o r d i n g s o f t h e d u s t e l e v a t o r motor were made. Typical

t h r e e d i f f e r e n t

r e s u l t s were:

- S p a r k i n g R a t e / M i n u t e f o r t h e t r a n s f o r m e r s :

Wi th Rubber

L i n e I: T r a n s f o r m e r A T r a n s f o r m e r B T r a n s f o r m e r C

L i n e 11: T r a n s f o r m e r A T r a n s f o r m e r B T r a n s f o r m e r C

2 6 8 s p a r k / m i n 11 2 s p a r k / m i n

4 .8 s p a r k / m i n

1 0 . 3 s p a r k / m i n 13,9 s p a r k / m i n

5 7 s p a r k / m i n

W i t h o u t Rubber

1 8 . 4 s p a r k / m i n 1 . 2 s p a r k / m i n 0 . 0 0 6 s p a r k / m i n

1 .8 s p a r k / m i n 0 6 s p a r k l m i n 0 0 4 s p a r k / m i n

11.

12.

13.

Page 6

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (cont'd)

- Dust return stability showing variations on the elevator motor amps (Scale 0-15 amps)

With Rubber Without Rubber

Variations: 6.4 to 10.4 amps 6.4 to 9.2 amps

The complete details of the precipitator, reaction appear in Appendix 111. Also, a sample of the precipitator dust, collected during and after the test, was sent to a specialized lab for resistivity analysis.

The deterioration of the precipitator efficiency is the only negative aspect of the trial made in St.Constant, and the reasons for this are unknown at this time but are under study.

SAMPLING DONE DURING AND AFTER TEST

Three samplig campaigns were made during the trial in order to determine the volatile recirculation:

a) Two were made during rubber injection on October 20 and 22, between 9:00 and 12:OO.

b) The last one was done on October 29, 48 hours after the rubber firing test was completed. All these samples were taken under very stable kiln conditions and should be very representative for volatile recirculation evaluation.

Daily rubber and clinker samples were taken during the test and sent to the Belleville lab for analysis. The results of these analysis are not yet known but will be included in the final report. A sketch showing the sampling points on the kiln circuit is included in Appendix V.

INDUSTRIAL GRINDING OF CLINKER PRODUCED

A four-hour grinding test of pure clinker produced during the test has already been done, and the internal test results are included in Appendix VI.

. -.

P a g e 7

1 3 . INDUSTRIAL G R I N D I N G OF C L I N K E R PRODUCED ( c o n t ' d )

A good p o r t i o n of t h e c l i n k e r p r o d u c e d d u r i n g t h e t e s t h a s a l r e a d y b e e n g r o u n d w i t h 5 0 % of n o r m a l c l i n k e r . The r e m a i n i n g c l i n k e r is s t o c k e d o n a n i so la ted p i l e i n t h e prehomo h a l l . The cement and c l i n k e r a n a l y s e s a re i n c l u d e d i n Appendix V I and c a n be summar ized as f o l l o w s :

W i t h o u t R u b b e r - K K With Rubber ( b e f o r e t e s t )

Fe203 3 .08 2 .91

F .CaO 0.62 0 .87

so3 0.87 1 .06

K20 0.66 0 .87

T h e s e r e s u l t s m u s t be c o n f i r m e d by t h e B e l l e v i l l e l a b r e s u l t s .

1 4 CONCLUSION

The S t . C o n s t a n t K i l n # 2 r u b b e r f i r i n g t es t was g e n e r a l l y p o s i t i v e . However, t h e d u s t co l l ec to r r e a c t i o n was a n e g a t i v e p o i n t i n t h i s t e s t and r e m a i n s t h e major q u e s t i o n mark of t h e f e a s i b i l i t y of b u r n i n g r u b b e r i n o u r c e m e n t k i l n s on a p e r m a n e n t b a s i s i n t h e f u t u r e .

f

\

Y

8

ut- I * Q Y

Y

L I 'I,

Y Y

-C

.'I -? ' . L J

'JJ b C' r:

0

s L

5 5 . I 1

; . - 2 , ' t ---------- t E $ Q' -2

" -- I

_ .

"

. - ' .I

,

'4 ic

I

. .

G o u R "2.

-T

Aa

I 2 2

27.

f i 3- I 2 2. I I S I 2 0

2 6 . 2 8 2 7 2 6 .

3 5- d

' I '

.. . - . * .

I .

;1 I .

. .

. .

. . . . .

‘-L 4 J

\ - - - a u

" , '.T .: :. 'L

. . . . . . . .,.. . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . PJ . . . . .

. . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .

. .

. . r

. . . . . . 1 . . >

' * ! I . - > .. ,

. , . . . ';r -. . ,, . ~ _,'.

i : : ; . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

' . . - . -

. . - ..

. . .

. .

- - . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . - . ' .. ' _ 'L I . . . -... I

. -. . _ - - - -. ~ .. . . ,.: L.'...; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<

. . -e:'

. . . . . . _'_ 7 : ' .

. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .

. . . .

0 0

cu cu c'

. r

- 0 0

m a cu Q

0 0

ln 0 0 cu

. d

a

c? 0

0 c\) =.I

Q

0 0 c o G.07 v o C Y a I??

. -

a .

4

e - c o u c o

.. W t- P a

0 0

cv e2 0

a

- a t- u €3

0 0

a cv

W t-

a

.. s

0 cu 0

II v) W 1 3 J W v) 2

a

m

W

c3 Q

0 a

d

o\ . 0 ..

e m u 0 O J

a

P- 6 6

..

0 0

cu 00 0'

a

.-. . e .u m 0 0

\o cu

Ltl i-

a

.. a a

'1 .------ ------ -- . e?.----,..- - "..- ............. _I--. .. . . . ,. _ I

. ..:-:';I g ' ?YJ p Fd a jiJ g ;-. pJ ~ - r"3 ._ , .

. . - . . . . . . f . . . .

. . . . !

. . .

. . . . . . - . .

: . .. . .

, - . . . f . .

. .

. . . .

. .

- . . . . . - . . . . . . _

. I . . . .

. . . . . .

t o n sieur M i c he I Baupre ' Ciment ,k f a r g e C.P. 390 ST €ONSTANT ($1 e'kc ) JOL 1x0

171 7, du Hnvre !Jr;ntri.al, OLJG!,~C t iX 2x3

Montr&al, Outbcc 113C 31i9 C.P. 61 11, S t J L C U : L ; l l e "A"

(514) 598-3444 Telex: 05-829541

Le 1 9 o c t o b e 1982

Idonsieur,

A Za sui te de notre coizversution t B Z @ b n i p e , UetriZZez tzqouver c i - j o i n t une copie montrant des aml_vses typiques du gaz mt-ireZ que nous achetons de notre fournisseur T~msCa-wda P ipe 1 ine s .

Si vous de'sirez plus de de'tails, n'he'sitez pus de e m - mirniquer avec Ze soussigne'.

VeuiZlez agre'er, monsiacr, Z 'expression de mes sentGnents Zes meiZZeurs.

,Wu CCL u- Roland Franeoeur, ing. Direeteur, ,4:ncrZFses e t D 5 i e Zoppement s techno log i p e s

f . . e .

1 EAZ t

I I

SAMPLE DATE 12922-9 l G A Z

STN.NO..... 4501 DATE ON..... E2-9-15 DATE OFF 82-9-29

COlfPANY.... TCPL CYL PRESS... ieo PSIG SAMP TEMP 58 F.

0.5539 I . G382 1.5225 2. G05S 2. 00sa 2.4910 2.4910 2.9753

-

* . 0.52669 0.02647 O.OC;15S 0.00000 0.00000 0.00900 0.00000 0. 00000

0.57846

.-- ------ --

994. E 5 1742.66 2480.40 3205.27 3214.21 394 1 .54 3SS0.58 4653.41

346.01 105 44.4u40 2.53001 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

952. 9%40

.----------

CALC. SP GR 0.57SE1 KI?!.RAS S P GR ,579 DE! r IAT ION 1.03199

B T U CALO,?IKETER 955 CALCLfLATED SSS.952Q 30" HC;, 60 DG Fz SAT.

COV\llJERT POTU TO MJ 37.89550 37.65206 I1 II n a i

1 (FROM CALCULATED ETU) I

i I ( FROM CA!-C.R I KETER B T U 1

. . ZGkZ

I

SFlKPLE DATE 1992-8-26 TRANSCANADA P I P E L I N E S 8SO8-27

C A L C U L A T I C N OF S.G. A N D B.T.U. CHROHATOGRAPHIC A N A L Y S I S

-------------________________ _-__-____-_--______________________ -------_ R E M L Y S I S NO. 82-100 S A f l P L E LOCN. h A P L E CYL NO. 111

S T N . N O ..... 4501 DATE ON.... . 82-8-9 DATE O F F 82-8-25 COMPANY.... T C P L CYL P R E S S ... 172 P S I G SAMP TEMP 64 F.

SOURCE P R E S S &poQ.SIG AMB.TEMP. .. . 64 F. TAKEN EY D.H. ------------ ------__ -----__--_-_-____ ----------- -------__-______________

EL EM EN T S UOL . MOL. ELEMENT S P . G R . BTU CONST eTu S P . G R . EXTN @ 30" HG EXTN F R A C T I O N

( 1 1 ( 1 ) X ( 2 ) 60 DG S A T ( 1 ) X ( 4 )

' (2) (3) ( 4 ) (5 ) ----------_ ---------- ---------- -_-_______ _____ - - - -- -_-

N2 . 0 1930 0.9672 0.01867 I N E R T co2 .OK381 1.5195 0.00579 I N E R T SUE TOTAL 0.02311

I 0

Cy4 4 -94654 0.5539 0.52429 994.89 941.70319 47.22988

0.52953 I . 15714 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

997.46875

C 2 H 6 ,02710 1.0382 0.0281 4 1742.86 C 3 H 8 .0@260 . 1.5225 . 0.00396 2980.40 C 4 . u 1 0 ( ! S O ) .00029 ' 2.0069 0.00058 J'Z05.27

2.0069 0.00072 3214.21

C S H I Z ( ! S O ) - 2.4920 0.00000 3541.54 C S H 1 2 ( N O R ) - 2.4910 0.00000 3S50. 5E 0.00000 4683.41

SUM 1. 00000 0.58214

---------__

C S H l O ( h ! . 3 2 ) ,00036

CGHl4+ 0 2.9753 ----------- -- ----__

K I M R A Y SP GR CALC. SP GR 0.58332 .584

BTU CALOR!HETER 1000 CALCULATED 999.490@ 30" HG, 60 DG Fr S A T .

D E V I R TI ON

CONIJERT BTU TO MJ 37.86319 (FROM CALCULATED BTU)

NCTE: TO D E T E R M I N E MOL % I MOVE MbL F R A C T I O N DECIMAL 2 P L A C E S

Y n 01 n 37.88750 (FROM CALORIMETER ETU)

TO T H E R I G H T .

I1 - H I N D I C A T E S " T R A C E ? UNDER L

NIL. KOL. F R A C T I O N . -- + / - a "

1.00203

SAMPLE DATE 1982-07-29 TRANSCANADA PIPELINES 82-97-29 . CALCULATION OF S.G. AND B.T.U. CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS .

______----_____--_______________________-------------------------------- GNALI'SIS NO. 82-87 SAMPLE LOCN. MAPLE CI'L NO. 637

STN.NO. .... 4501 DATE ON..... 82-7-12 DATE OFF 82-7-28

COHPANY.. . . TCPL CYL PRESS... 175 PSIG SAMP TEMP 62 F.

0.5539 1.0382 1.5225 2.0068 2.0068 2.4910 2.4910 2.9753

0.52794 0.02339 0 . 00 1 2 3 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0 . 00000

L 0.00000

0.57744 -----------

994.89 1742.86 2480.40 3205.27 3214.21 394 1 .54 3950.58 4683.41

948.25952 39.26529 2.00912 0.00000 0.00000 O.(j0000 0. 00000 0. 00000

989.53387 -----------

CALC. SP GR 0.57858 \ K I M R q Y SP GR .578 DEVIATION 1.00198

ETU CALORIMETER 992 CALCULATED 991.490@ 30" HGr 60 DG Fr SAT.

CONVERT BTU T O MJ 37.56506 (FROM CALCULATED BTU 1 I1 II I I II 37.58440 (FROM CALORIMETER BTU)

V O T E : TO DETERMINE MOL % I MOVE MOL FRACTION DECIMAL 2 PLACES +.-

T O THE RIGHT.

t

I - 1 . I

I I .' I i I I I :; I 3 m I

- I C n I > l b -110 c i a Z I

* I 0 U I Z - I I I J

Q I U

a i =

a i > -

I I I I h

I e I I 2x10 I 3 i - A - I l - % d

- n

. I m w - 11

- 1

I > - I F - I-

I Z I C n 2 1 0 w I U = ad-

c1I- 0

a i

m i cnua

X I o n - a i = ~ m

I m m m

h

I I I I I I . N I & - A

I U Z % O I * I - - -

h

L L I a x 4 e 1 W W - t o 1

I * I - 1 . I - I +

a i z . E l w e W I T G - I - I W . N

. t -La .- m i w c n

0 N 0 ~ P 0 0 0 P m e N 1 0 0 0 0

Pa e 4 4 0 0 0 4.4 o m m o o 0 4 m m c\i PI o 0 o . . . . . . . .

I I I I I I I 1 I I I

b

0

0

m m

a m .r(

0 0

4

0 m I

c!l / 3 L L l e

Pl LD

a L t I r - w o i - w p - + x

m

a 5 a m

4 4 N O 0 0 0 0 1013 0

a m

z 0

l- Q

U

U

ffl W u -I R

N

a - 2 xi- + m

3 W a

I lV

%t

PI m 4

I-l- LL [L w w z z H H

z ti \ 0

L H

-1

t a l r I

G I 0 1 C I

. c (n

LL

a

L

\ i_l a [I: LL c:

H

u W

z 0

n

W c

In to P ul

I a i

'I: E I 3 1

x(2: 00 J-1

uu a<

I I a 0

U.JO m m 40

03 0 .o 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s o 0

v) m 10 fi

U a F

-1 0 x 00 . .

0 0

in . 0

Lz U Q cn i

cr E Y

a

U

x x 00 e[I:

0 CD

c5 I

0 FJ

L

- -

0 5 (L L L .

. . . . 0000 0

. . . 0 0 0

Y Y

I I I I I I I I

- 1 I

-1 0 (2: u

n W I> 0 E:

m m 0

m 0

E l

I I I

U I * z 1 - 1 0

cn I O H

I .u 4

I OLL

a i

n i E +

1-1a -

0

N In W ,

m m -I

0 ~ . WI- ZI M U t u ee W k-W W I

00 I-I-

W

Qt

..

4 - 1

u l u * I - o a

0 0 0

-3: t:

O = I-

[I: W c- n

a W l-

-I 3 U J

u a

0 0 0

I I i L I

f f l l f f l l W I L T I a l m

I I - W I Z U I W L z I X 3 1 W O I J f f l i w

0 0

U n I' z I

I I

w t 0 0 0

A A

. a . . . . ar U

U J a

3 I--= m L

W

e 0 J

0 a

0 Cn

(r 0 z ' >

0 2 z a . a

H Y h:

W 2: Z 0 0

- Y

0 4 U

J Q: u

z x I - 0 m u

r ct

3 I- m

I IATE OFF 82-4-21

SAMP TEMP 44) Fa

- -

C Y L FRESS*, , 300 F'SIG

I Ctf4 t 95753

c3tio * 0012b C 4 t t 1 0 ( IS01 00009 C 4 t I 1 0 (NOR) *00010 CSIi12( ISU) 0 C S l t 1 2 ( N O R ) 0 Cf)H14+ 0

C 2 ti6 01732 0 5539 1 e 0382 1 * 5225 2 a 0068 2 * 0068 2,4910 2,4910 2,9753

0 53038 0,01798 0,00195

0.00020 0 * 00000 0 * 00000 0 * 00000

0. 0001 a

994 89 1742+[36 2480 * 40 3205 * 27 3214 e 21 3941e54 3950.58 '

4603*41

952 t 63702 30*.18530 3,17491 0.2q847

0 , 00000 0 00000 0 t 00000

.0,3q143

C A L C , SF GR 0,57642 KIMRAY SF GR ,576 D E V I A T I O N 1 *00195

TU CALORIMETER 988 C A L C UL A T E LS 988,535@ 30' HGr 60 DG Fr SAT,

CONVERT BTU TO M J 37,45311 (FROM CALCULATED RTU) 8 8 8 8 37,43285 (FROM CALORIMETER DTU)

- * NOTE: TO DETERMINE M O L % r MOVE MOL FRACTION I IECIMAL 2 PLACES

T O THE RIGHT,

8 - 8 INDICATES 'TRACE' UNDER VOL M O L FRACTION,

: . .. , . ( .

i

+ G A i

STN.NO..... 4501 DATE ON..... 82-5-4 DATE OFF 82-5-26

COHPANY.. . . TCPL CYL PRESS... 205 PSIG SAMP TEMP -

SOURCE PRESS 740 PSIG

ELEMENTS I'OL. moL. FfiACT I ON

CH4 .95646

C3H8 .00131 C4HlOtISO) .00010 C4HlO(NOR) .00010 CJHIZ(IS0) - C5HlZ(NOR) 0 CSH 14+ 0

C2H6 .oi7as

SUM 1.00000

0.9672 0.02055 INERT -1.5155 0.00500 INERT

0.5539 1.0382 I .5225 2.0068 2.0068 2.4910 2.4910 2.9753

0.52370 0.01816 0.00199 0.00020 0.00020 0.00000 0.00000 0.0@000

0.57589

334.83 1742.86 2480.40 3205.27 3214.21 3341.54 3950.58 4683.41

551.57251 30.481 57 3.24332 0.32053 0.32143 0.00000 0.00000 0. @OOOO

385.94537 -------__-

CALC. SP GR 9.57701 KIMRAY SP GR .577 DEVIATION 1.00195

BTU CALORIMETER 988 CALCULATED 987.8728 30" HGr 60 DG F. SAT.

CONVERT ETU TO MJ 37.42798 (FROM CALCULATED BTU) 8 37.43285 (FROH CALORIMETER BTU) m n m

NOTE: T O DETERMINE MOL Zv-MOWE HOL FRACTION DECIHAL 2 PLACES . TO THE RIGHT.

4 .

.. r *

I.. CI~E,ENTS CANADA LAFARGE L T E E 1 USINE DE ST.CONSTANT

Le 1 7 septembre 1982.

LISTES DES MODIFICATIONS A F A I R E SUR L ' APPARE I L A . CHAUFFAGE AU CAOUTCHOUC

TRAVAUX

1-

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

7-

8-

9-

Tremie niveau l e r plancher, modification d u c i r c u i t "Air Blaster" e t i n s t a l l a t ion de deux valves sur l e c i r c u i t .

Tremie niveau 2e plancher, i n s t a l l a t ion de def lecteur sur l a courroie pour empecher l e materiel de tomber en bas de l a courroi e.

Tuyere - Fabrication d'une nouvelle tuyere 4 " dia . - 20 pied de long - Recouvrement de materiel i so lan t sur 10 pieds.

Poutre en I - Relocalisation de l a poutre servant ; . re teni t - l a tuyere - Rendre para l le le ce t t e poutre 5 l a tuysre bunker.

Depoussierage - dGpoussi6rage de l a valve ro ta t ive .

- Depoussierage f a i t a l ' a i d e de l ' a i r primaire.

Ins ta l la t ion de tuyaux e t f l ex ib l e pour l e

Valve ro t a t ive - Ins ta l la t ion de l a nouvelle valve rotative de marque - ' ' ? q a s ~ ' I

Compresseurs - Ins ta l la t ion d'un,compresseur de marque

Detecteur de haute pression

Detecteur de d e b i t - 3 savoir s i l a chijte e s t remplie.

L

Merci 1.

Pierre Beau1 i eu