short peripheral iv catheters and infections - ipac mb · pdf fileshort peripheral iv...

76
Short Peripheral IV Catheters and Infections CHICA- Manitoba Victoria Inn June 21, 2013

Upload: lephuc

Post on 14-Mar-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Short Peripheral IV Catheters and Infections

CHICA- Manitoba

Victoria Inn

June 21, 2013

Financial Disclosure

• None

Personal Disclaimer

I think I’m very funny, not everyone

thinks I’m funny.

I am a glass half empty girl. I look for the

undesirable outcomes.

Multiple challenges obtaining data

regarding peripheral outcomes.

Lynn Hadaway

Image and Bio

Lynn Hadaway

1400 abstracts, 588 Publications.

Medline (via PubMed), Ingenta, CINAHL,

Google Scholar.

Included data/ discussion of any type if

infection associated with short peripheral

catheters.

Excluded any data on mechanical and

chemical causes of phlebitis.

Intravenous Catheters and

Infection

Intravenous (IV) catheters are now

reported to be the single most common

source of bacteremia and fungemia. (1)

1.7 billion sold annually worldwide.

330 million sold annually in the USA.

National Healthcare Safety Network

(NHSN)

Voluntary submission of infection data

for CDC.

Includes data on any vascular access

device.

Addresses both patient and healthcare

worker safety.

National Healthcare Safety

Network (NHSN)

Central Line Associated Bloodstream

Infections (CLBSI) are addressed.

Tip location in the SVC/ CAJ

Definitions include:

CVAD present 48 h before S&S develop

Not related to any other infection site

National Healthcare Safety

Network (NHSN)

No mention of surveillance on Vascular

Access Devices (VAD) within the

peripheral vessels.

- Yet these devices are part of the

reporting system.

CRBSI

CRBSI- laboratory findings that identify

CVC as BSI source and used to

determine diagnosis, treatment, and

possibly epidemiology of BSI in patients

with CVC.

Not typically used for surveillance (more

in clinical research).

CLBSI

CLABSI- laboratory confirmed BSI only

requires a CVAD to be present with in 48

hrs of S&S and it not be related to any

other source.

Not a rigorous criteria. May lead to an

overestimation of the actual rates.

These rates would NOT include infection

from a short peripheral catheter.

Financial Implications

2008 Medicare & Medicaid Services

disallowed payment for certain hospital

acquired conditions.

List included vascular catheter-

associated infections.

No clarity on type of catheter, location of

catheter.

No clarity on type of infection.

Financial Implications

Nosocomial BSIs reported to be the 8th

leading cause of death in the US (3).

$23,242 +/- $5184 (2005 dollars) (3).

Financial Implications

Hospital must prove the infection was

present or incubating on admission.

Financial Implications

Hospitals participating in NHSN system

has no formal way to document

infections related to peripheral IV.

No real incentive as these would be

considered hospital acquired with no

payment to the hospital for their

treatment.

What's the Big Deal?

3 cases- Osteomyelitis.

5 cases- Cardiac Implantable electronic

devices (24).

2 cases- Peritonitis in PD catheters (25).

4 immunocompromised oncology pt with

probable cutaneous zygomycosis from

adhesive tape on a peripheral catheter (26).

CDC Guidelines

Center for Disease Control (CDC) 2011

does include peripheral catheters.

However, the discussion section only

includes CVADs.

Includes a table of catheters for venous

and arterial, but states “rarely associated

with bloodstream infection.” 2(p22)

Types of Infections

Local: cellulitis and

soft tissue.

Types of Infections

Phlebitis or thrombophlebitis

Types of Infections

Suppurative thrombophlebitis: presents

of purulent drainage.

The clinical S&S may overlap making it

difficult to identify the problem without

additional diagnostic tools such as

ultrasound and cultures.

Phlebitis

Definition: inflammation of the vein (4)

Nursing/ medical literature describes 3

causes:

Chemical

Mechanical

Infectious

Chemical

Infusion of

hyperosmolar fluids

(>600 mOsm/ liter)

and/ or solutions and

medications with a

pH <5 or >9.

pH

Indicates hydrogen

ion concentration in

a solution

Blood = 7.35 - 7.45

pH of 6 - 8 minimizes

disruption of venous

endothelium

Blood has significant

buffering capacity

Mechanical

Catheter size,

insertion technique

and methods of

catheter and joint

stabilization.

Infectious

Deficits in skin

antiseptics, catheter

handling and joint

stabilization.

Confusion?

This leads confusion about whether the

inflammation allows for the infection, or if

the infection creates the inflammation.

Cherie’s Opinion

All three contribute to infection.

Maki, Systematic Lit Review

(2006)

January 1966-July 2005 (38.5 yrs).

110 studies of plastic catheters.

10,910 catheters; 28,720 device-days.

13 BSIs= pooled mean rate 0.1 event

per 100 days.

0.4 pooled mean events per 100 device days.

Lowest rates of all devices by percentage. (23)

Culture Results

Most prevalent pathogen in peripheral

catheters BSI is Staphylococus aureus (5-

7).

Retrospective analysis of all US hospital

admissions estimate > 10,000 S. Aureus

bacteraemia from peripheral catheter

occurring annually(8).

Rates of each type of Infection

Zingg and Pittet (6) widely held

assumption that thrombophlebitis can

become BSI.

They estimate 5%-25% of peripheral

catheters were colonized at the time of

removal.

Reasons for the low BSI rate vs high

colonization- short dwell time, fewer

manipulations and lack of surveillance.

Issues Related to BSI

Catheter design,

Skin Antiseptic,

Inserters skill level,

Predisposition to phlebitis,

Use of vein visualization technology,

Catheter stabilization.

Sources of Contamination

Catheter Design

Ported catheters- multiple injection ports,

or ones with non-replaceable caps.

Injection Ports

Attachment of stopcocks known risk for

infection.

Germany study reported 27 BSI cases

per 100 patients, 104 events per 1000

catheter days.

27% of patients experiencing possible

infections, there is little doubt about the

risks of injection ports. (11)

Infusion System

One hospital in London had 30 reported

MRSA bacteremia's. Changing to a

closed system decreased rates to 14

MRSA bacteremia's.

BUT...Also introduced split septum, CHG

along with other policy changes and a

massive educational campaign.

Microbiology of the Skin

80% of the

resident bacteria

exist within the

epidermis.

20% are found in

biofilms within hair

follicles and

sebaceous

glands.

Complete re-

colonization can

occur within 18 hrs of

antiseptic application

Ryder, MA. Catheter-Related Infections: It's All About Biofilm. Topics in Advanced Practice Nursing eJournal. 2005;5(3)

©2005 Medscape, Posted 08/18/2005 .

Skin Antisepsis

Primary source of organisms colonizing

the IV catheter comes from the skin.

Careful attention to the antiseptic agent,

method of application and the total

contact time for application and drying.

Familiarization of the various products

and their uses directly contributes to their

effectiveness.

Antiseptic Agents

Traditional teachings

involved inner/ outer

concentric circles.

This typically

involved simply

painting the skin.

Three impregnated

sticks.

CHG

Use of a back and forth scrubbing

method (Manufactures IFU).

Only 1 published study available on the

application technique .(12)

Several studies show CHG produces

better outcomes for blood donation and

blood culture collection. (14-17)

Best Practice Guidelines

Infusion Nurses Standards and CDC

(2011) states CHG is preferred skin

antiseptic (except infants less that 2

months).

Tincture of iodine, iodphor, and 70%

alcohol are also acceptable for short

peripheral catheter insertion.

Both state should be applied to CLEAN

SKIN.

Infectious Disease Society of

America (IDSA)

These list alcohol, tincture of iodine, or

alcoholic CHG as acceptable.

State povidone-iodine is not adequate.

Emphasizes the need for adequate

contact and drying time. (18)

Inserters Skill Level

Two studies assessed the skill of

inserters.

One reported ER nurses had a greater

phlebitis rate than IV therapists (3.7% vs.

2.1%). (13)

Second reported 36% inserted by

generalists and 20% by infusion nurses

were removed for complications. (19)

Predisposition to Phlebitis

Pt experiencing phlebitis with the first

catheter were 5.1 times more likely to

suffer from phlebitis from subsequent

catheters. (19)

Why?

Is related to the infusions?

The insertion site?

The skill of the inserter?

Use of Vein Visualization

Technology

Infrared and ultrasound

Infrared

Infrared is hands free.

No change in technique for insertion.

Does not touch the patients skin.

Ultrasound

Widely available in most hospitals.

Requires one hand to hold the probe.

Coupling gel.

Ultrasound

CVAD insertions: sterile procedure

covers and sterile coupling gel.

Short peripheral catheter insertion is not

considered sterile.

Mini Ultrasound Equipment

- Smaller, portable

equipment

- Individual, sterile probe

tips.

- Assists in determining

vessel size,

appropriateness of

catheter

Disadvantages

Formal education not available.

Healthcare workers picking up the device

and using it.

Poor site selection

Poor vessel: vein ratio

No training on anatomy (nerve identification)

No peripheral infection data reported on

any vein technology.

Catheter Stabilization

Gained attention

over the past 15 yrs.

Initially advertise to

replace sutures.

Studies showed

decrease in

unplanned restarts,

no data on infectious

outcomes. (20)

Tape

Tape is not sterile

- Pockets, on bedside

tables, on IV poles,

window etc.

- The adhesive picks

up fuzz, bacteria and

other debris.

- NEVER place this

under a sterile

dressing.

Time in Situ

Prior to 2011, all documents

recommended routine removal/

replacement after a specific dwell time.

The length of time was increased from

48 hours to 96 hours.

CDC revised wording states “... No more

frequently than every 72-96 hours for the

purpose of reducing infection...”

INS, 2011

Removed the routine removal

recommendation.

“The nurse should consider replacement

of the short peripheral catheter when

clinically indicated...” 4(pS57).

Scrub the Hub

When you access a

catheter to

administer

medications, change

the end cap, or flush

the catheter. You

can inadvertently

introduce micro-

organisms into the

catheter.

Flushing Techniques

- Use of a 5-10mL syringe

- Do not use the pump to

flush your catheter

- It is the pressure exerted

from a syringe that really

forces fluid through the

device and clears it of

blood and residual

drugs.

Cherie’s Opinion: Education

Inserters skill level directly influences

success rate, increases longevity of the

device and decrease infection risks.

1-3 hours spent in traditional classroom

theory surrounding infusion therapy.

3-10 hours spent in “lab” type

environments.

Opportunity to develop skill fragmented.

Cherie’s Opinion: Skill Level

No literature supporting a required

amount of time or XX number of

insertions before becoming proficient.

I estimate 3 months, full time hours on

VAT before advancing beyond “novice”.

Average of 10 “insertions” day, can be

40/week. 3 months = 480 ish.

The generalist nurse may get 2/wk= 25

ish in the same time period.

Vascular Access Specialized

Training

Education on skin cleansing agents.

Education on dressing material and

application.

Education on solutions/ medications (pH

and osmolarity).

Education on vessel assessment.

Education on vessel preservation.

Admit when you are licked.

Protect the Skin

The skin or integument is the first organ

affected by vascular access.

It is a barrier against micro-organisms

and provides sensory temperature

regulation.

Inserting an intravenous device breaks

this natural barrier and

increases the risk of infection.

Nursing Assessment

Measure twice, cut once.

Site selection aides in the longevity of

the device.

CDC states “In adults, use an upper-

extremity site for catheter insertion.

Replace a catheter inserted in a lower

extremity site to an upper extremity site

as soon as possible.” Category II (2)

Insertion Sites

Nursing textbooks recommend starting

low on the extremity and moving

upwards

Site Selection

Perhaps this is

related to the low

success rate on

the first attempts

necessitating the

need to go above

previous

insertions?

Device Selection

Smallest device, in the biggest vein for

the desired therapy.

“Go big, or go home...”

7 rights of medication, 7 IV rights

Appropriateness of request.

Device size, (diameter/ length), design,

need.

Insertion site, vessel size (diameter/ length),

health.

Nursing Assessment

Consideration regarding the use of the

device is upmost importance (i.e. CT,

Chemo, pre-op, blood transfusion etc.).

This determines site selection, gauge

and even appropriateness of the

need/request.

Blood Flow

Blood flow to the

hand is approx. 10

ml/ minute.

Multiple small, short

vessels.

Subject to movement

due to decreased

tissue/ muscle in the

hand.

Blood flow

Forearm vessels offer

a longer, straighter

pathway.

Higher blood flow for

greater dilution.

Bones of the ulna and

radius act as natural

splints which allow for

freedom of movement

and greater

independence.

Danger Zone

Devices placed at or

about the wrist area.

Must be a minimum of

two fingers above the

bend at the wrist.

Can take up to 3 months

for the numbness to

resolve.

Many suffer permanent

nerve damage.

Dressing

Decreases the

movement within

the vessel.

Documentation

Often overlooked and poorly done.

Must include:

All attempts.

Site location (vessel name, description).

Gauge/ length of catheter.

Cleansing agent.

Add on equipment.

Blood returns/ flushing.

Patients tolerance.

Summary

Numerous practice changes in 30 yrs.

Sicker patient population, living longer.

Improved skin cleansing agents (CHG).

Removed teams with highly skilled

infusion nurses, giving this task to

primary care/ generalists.

Summary

330 million IV catheters sold in the US.

Venipuncture success rates of 2.18

attempts (21) and 2.35 attempts (22) to

establish one site.

If ½ the catheters sold are successfully

inserted, 0.1% of these produce a BSI.

165,000 infections annually.

Clearly, more research is needed.

Cherie’s Opinion

Devices/ equipment do

not directly cause

infection.

People cause infection.

Protect the skin.

Follow the Best

Practice Guidelines.

Follow the

Manufacture’s IFU.

Questions

References

1. Pien BC, Sundaram P, Raoof N, et al. The clinical and prognostic importance of positive blood cultures in

adults. Am J Med. 2010;123(9):819-828.

2. O’Grady N, Alexander M, Burns L, Dellinger E. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-

Related Infections. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/BSI/BSI-guidelines-2011.html Accessed April 1, 2011.

3. Weber DJ, Rutala WA. Central line-associated bloodstream infections: prevention and management. Infect

Dis Clin North Am. 2011;25(1):77-102.

4. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion nursing standards of practice. J Infus Nurs. 2011;34(1 suppl):S1-S110.

5. Zingg W, Pittet D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents.

2009;34(4)(suppl):S38-S42.

6. Siegman-Igra Y, Jacobi E, Lang R, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. Unexpected hospital-acquired bacteraemia in

patients at low risk of bloodstream infection: the role of a heparin drip. J Hosp Infect. 2005;60(2):122-128.

7. Boyd S, Aggarwal I, Davey P, Logan M, Nathwani D. Peripheral intravenous catheters: the road to quality

improvement and safer patient care. J Hosp Infect. 2010;77(1):37-41.

8. Trinh TT, Chan PA, Edwards O, et al. Peripheral venous catheter related Staphylococcus aureus

bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(6):579.

9. Chavakis T, Wiechmann KT, Preissner MH. Staphylococcus aureus interactions with the endothelium.

Thromb Haemost. 2005; 94:278-285.

10. Sinha B, Herrmann M. Mechanism and consequences of invasion of endothelial cells by Staphylococcus

aureus. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94(2):266.

11. Grune F, Schrappe M, Basten J, Wenchel H, Tual E, Stutzer H. Phlebitis rate and time kinetics of short

peripheral intravenous catheters. Infection. 2004;32(1):30-32.

12. Stonecypher K. Going around in circles: is this the best practice for preparing the skin? Crit Care Nurs Q.

2009;32(2):94-98.

References

13. Lee WL, Chen HL, Tsai TY, et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized

patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(8):683-686.

14. McDonald C, McGuane S, Thomas J, et al. A novel rapid and effective donor arm disinfection method.

Transfusion. 2010;50(1):53-58.

15. Ramirez-Arcos S, Goldman M. Skin disinfection methods: prospective evaluation and post implementation

results. Transfusion. 2010; 50(1):59-64.

16. Marlowe L, Mistry RD, Coffin S, et al. Blood culture contamination rates after skin antisepsis with

chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine in a pediatric emergency department. Infect Control Hosp

Epidemiol. 2010;31(2):171-176.

17. Tepus D, Fleming E, Cox S, Hazelett S, Kropp D. Effectiveness of Chloraprep in reduction of blood culture

contamination rates in emergency department. J Nurs Care Qual. 2008;23(3):272-276.

18. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of

Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin

Infect Dis. 2009;49:1-45.

19. Palefski S, Stoddard G. The infusion nurse and patient complication rates of peripheral-short catheters: a

prospective evaluation. J Intraven Nurs. 2001;24(2):113-123.

20. Smith B. Peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times. J Infus Nurs. 2006;29(1):14-17.

21. Barton A, Danek G, Johns P, Coons M. Improving patient outcomes through CQI: vascular access

planning. J Nurs Care Qual. 1998;13(2):77-85.

22. Lininger R. Pediatric peripheral IV insertion success rates. Pediatr Nurs. 2003;29(5):351-354.

23. Maki D, Kluger D, Crnich C. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices:

a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81(9):1159-1171.

References

24. Othman H, Fishbain JT, Khatib R. The role of intravenous catheters in cardiovascular implantable

electronic device infections: Identifying potential targets for prevention. Am J Infect Control 2012.

25. Ma M, Yap D, Yip T, Lui S, Lo W. Staphylococcus aureus Peritonitis in Two Peritoneal Dialysis Patients:

An Uncommon Complication of Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Infection. Peritoneal Dialysis International

2012;32:573-4.

26. Lalayanni C, Baliakas P, Xochelli A, et al. Outbreak of cutaneous zygomycosis associated with the use of

adhesive tape in haematology patients. J Hosp Infect 2012;81:213-5.