sharvari karandikar-chheda

Upload: sandeep11661

Post on 14-Apr-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    1/23

    Gender-based Violence Among Female

    Sex Workers Of Kamathipura, Mumbai,India: A Contextual Analysis

    Sharvari Karandikar

    College of Social Work

    The Ohio State [email protected]

    May 27, 2010

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    2/23

    Presentation Outline

    Location of research:

    Mumbai, India

    Nature of Sex-trafficking in

    India Nature of Sex Work in India

    Purpose of the Research

    Overall Findings of the

    Research

    Trafficking in person study

    Commission: research sub-

    commission

    Research Part I Research Part II

    Major Findings

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    3/23

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    4/23

    Location of Study: Kamathipura

    Asias largest red-light area(Menen, 2007)

    Almost 200 years old

    5,000 sex workers (male,female and transgendered)

    90 percent sex workers havesome sexually transmittedinfection at any given pointof time (Gangoli, 2006)

    70 percent are estimated tobe HIV positive (Avert,2006)

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    5/23

    Location of Study: Kamathipura

    Kamathipura was originallysettled by construction

    workers called Kamathis

    In 1800s, British troops

    brought European womenfor sex work to Bombay

    They were provided rooms

    in Kamathipura which were

    later termed as brothels Gradually sex workers from

    India settled in this area

    (Tambe, 2004)

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    6/23

    Nature of sex work in Kamathipura India

    Kamathipura is divided in14 lanes

    7 lanes have brothels andare populated by sexworkers

    Other lanes have low-income houses, shops, teastalls, small factories etc

    Sex workers are both,Brothel-based and Street-

    based Sex workers earnings range

    from $1-$200 per day

    Sex workers of all agegroups are seen in

    Kamathipura

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    7/23

    Nature of sex trafficking in Kamathipura

    India

    Destination city fortrafficking victims

    Majority sex workers arevictims of sex-trafficking

    Average age of entry is 12years

    From rural areas to Mumbai

    Nepal and Bangladesh toMumbai

    South India to Mumbai

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    8/23

    Purpose of the Study

    To exploreexperiences ofgender-basedviolence amongfemale sexworkers ofKamathipura

    To study the

    social, economic,political and legalcontext in whichviolence occurs

    Macro-context

    Legislatures,

    policymakers, health

    ministers, etc.

    Micro-context

    Intimate partners,

    pimps, clients, brothel-

    owners

    Female

    Sex

    Worker Mezzo-context

    Police, social

    workers,

    health-care

    workers

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    9/23

    Research Questions

    How do sex workers of Kamathipura, India define and explaingender-based violence (GBV) in their day-to-day lives?

    What are the perceptions of stakeholders on sex work ingeneral?

    What are the perceptions of stakeholders on violence against sexworkers of Kamathipura?

    How do sex workers individual experiences relate to thebroader social, economic, political and legal context ofKamathipura?

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    10/23

    Research Methods

    Phase I (pilot)

    [May-June, 2006]

    10 Female Sex Workers

    Interviews were done in

    collaboration with

    Prerana and the TataInstitute of Social

    Sciences

    Phase II

    [December-February,

    2008]

    10 Female Sex Workers

    13 Male Clients, Pimps,

    Partners

    5 Female Brothel-keepers

    5 Social Workers

    2 Police Officers

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    11/23

    Results

    Severe forms of coercion

    and violence reported from

    intimate partners, pimps,

    clients, and the police

    Expressed anxiety over

    safety and security in the

    red-light area

    Difficulty in condom

    negotiation and HIV

    prevention

    Majority of sex workers

    were HIV positive

    Transition in the role of

    male partners from

    Clients to Intimate

    Partners to Pimps

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    12/23

    Female sex workersreported partners

    becoming pimps,managing their

    business

    Male partnersconsidered pimping to

    be a way of helping

    Male partnersperceived their roles asprotectors

    Males followed sexworkers, controlledtheir time, number ofclients and income

    Female sex workersviewed help as anuisance

    Female resistance wasdealt with by actual

    physical, sexualviolence

    Results Continued

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    13/23

    Sex workers identified

    themselves as victims of

    violence

    Male intimate partners did

    not identify themselves as

    perpetrators

    Male partners

    acknowledged use of

    violence

    Normal household issue

    Women have to be beatenfor their mistakes

    We have a right to beat if

    she does not listen

    Results

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    14/23

    The research highlighted the macro and micro-context of

    sex work, particularly with reference to India

    Analyses of these contexts indicated sex workerseconomic, social, political and legal vulnerabilities

    At a macro-level, sex workers were victims of thecriminalization policy

    At a micro-level, sex workers were physically, sexually

    and financial exploited on a regular basis

    The findings provide a unique and in-depth understandinginto the lives of sex workers in India and generated ideasfor research, social work practice, and policy

    Overall Summary of the Research

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    15/23

    Developing strategies to

    work with male partners on

    violence prevention in

    Kamathipura

    Gender sensitization

    workshops to break

    patriarchal myths

    Interventions such as

    Bystander intervention

    model andJohns School

    Practice Implications

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    16/23

    AVERT. (2005).HIV/AIDS in India. Retrieved September 19, 2005 from

    http://www.avert.org/aidsindia.htm

    Dutton, M.A., & Goodman, L.A. (2005). Coercion in Intimate PartnerViolence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52,743-756.

    Gangoli, G. (2000). Silence hurt and choice: Attitudes to prostitution inIndia and the west. London School of Economics.

    Lim, L. (1998). The sex sector: The economic and social bases of

    prostitution in Southeast Asia. Geneva: International Labor Organization.

    Menen, R. (2007).Karma Sutra, Essays from the margin. Canada: SagaBooks

    References

    http://www.avert.org/aidsindia.htmhttp://www.avert.org/aidsindia.htmhttp://www.avert.org/aidsindia.htm
  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    17/23

    Graham-Kevan, N. (2006). Partner violent typologies. In J. Hamel & T.Nicholls (Eds.), Family interventions in domestic violence: A handbook ofgender-inclusive theory and treatment (pp. 145-163). New York: SpringerPublishing.

    Guttman, M. C. (1997).Trafficking in men: The anthropology ofmasculinity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 385-409.

    Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence:Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and theFamily, 57, 283-294.

    Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: symmetry and asymmetry indomestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.),Couples in conflict (pp. 95-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.

    References

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    18/23

    Human Trafficking in Ohio

    Research Sub-commission established (July 2009) within the

    Ohios State Trafficking in Persons Study Commission

    Research sub-commission decided to undertake research in

    two parts Part 1: Estimate the number of victims of human trafficking in

    Ohio

    Part 2: Understand the experiences ( problems, difficulties) of

    victims of human trafficking in Ohio

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    19/23

    Research Part 1

    Research Committee Members

    Celia Williamson, Ph.D. Chair University of Toledo

    Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda, Ph.D. Ohio State

    Jeff Barrows, M.D. Gracehaven

    Trisha Smouse, Coalition on Human trafficking

    Gene Kelly, Clark County Sherriffs Office

    Peter Swartz, Toledo Police Department Nadia Lucchin, Not for Sale Campaign

    Mark Ballard, Immigration Customs Enforcement

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    20/23

    Methods

    Based on reports, databases, newspaper articles, and research

    articles, the team developed risk factors for foreign-born

    victims that may be most prevalent in Ohio.

    The framework for estimating the prevalence of human

    trafficking in Ohio was taken from Clawson, Layne, and

    Smalls (2006) study entitled,Estimating Human Trafficking

    into the United States: Development of a Methodology.

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    21/23

    Ohio: Case Study

    Transit, Destination and Origin State

    The Presence of Markets for Human Trafficking

    Demand for Sexual and Labor Services in NeighboringStates

    The Presence of Sizable Populations of Foreign BornIndividuals

    Weak Laws that would Attract Potential Traffickers & TheirVictims

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    22/23

    Factors contributing to trafficking in Ohio

    include

    Ohios response to trafficking is weak,

    Ohios first responders to human trafficking remain

    unaware and unprepared and services are insufficient

    Customers who purchase youth remain protected, and

    traffickers suffer minimal consequences

    Ohio youth experience high rates of vulnerability

  • 7/27/2019 Sharvari Karandikar-Chheda

    23/23

    Major Findings

    Ohio Youth Ages 12 to 17 =675,922

    Estimate of the Total At-Risk Ohio Youth Population= 3,016

    Estimated to be Trafficked=1,078