sharing program chapter 7

27
RESEARCH METHODS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS Chapter 7 OBSERVING LANGUAGE CLASSROOMS

Upload: purwanto-ipuk

Post on 26-Jul-2015

186 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sharing program chapter 7

RESEARCH METHODS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE

TEACHERS

Chapter 7

OBSERVING LANGUAGE CLASSROOMS

Page 2: Sharing program chapter 7

Definition

A classroom observation:

• is a formal or informal observation of teaching while it is

taking place in a classroom or other learning

environment.

• Typically conducted by fellow teachers, administrators,

or instructional specialists

• used to provide teachers with constructive critical

feedback aimed at improving their classroom

management and instructional techniques

Page 3: Sharing program chapter 7

Definition

• Pivotal (important because other things depend on it) activity

• with a crucial role to play • in classroom research, • teacher’s personal professional growth, • and school development as a whole

(Hopkins, 1993)

Page 4: Sharing program chapter 7

Definition

• Three categories:– System-based/ethnographic/ad hoc (for

a particular purpose or need, esp. for an immediate need) procedures

(Wallace, 1991)– Systematic/structured/focused/open observation

(Hopkins, 1993)– Binary structured/open distinction

(Seliger and Shohamy, 1989)

Page 5: Sharing program chapter 7

• Requires:– Observer’s degree of participation– Objectivity issue– Inductive (heuristic) parameter– Deductive (analytic) parameter

Heuristic: a method of learning or solving problems that allows people to discover things themselves and learn from their own experiences

Analytic : involving the careful, systematic study of something

Page 6: Sharing program chapter 7

Observation: uses and perspectives• Look at the example:

Page 7: Sharing program chapter 7

Observer:

• Course director• Head/senior teacher• Colleague/peer• Trainee/junior teacher• New/teacher• Researcher from outside the institution• External assessor

Page 8: Sharing program chapter 7

Goals

• Placement of students• Evaluation of efficacy of materials• Apprenticeship for novice/trainee staff• Staff appraisal: formative/developmental• Quality assurance and control• Personal development• Improvement in methodology

Page 9: Sharing program chapter 7

Procedures

• Checklists and written criteria• Audio-and video-recordings• Notes and logs• Participation/non-participation• With/without feedback

Page 10: Sharing program chapter 7

Observation for Research

1) Research to increasing knowledge and understanding of phenomenon

2) Research to bring about change, innovation and action

3) Research for personal-professional development

Page 11: Sharing program chapter 7

Systematizing observation

• Using preplanned observational categories:– Coding schemes or systematic observational

schedules• The observer recognizes instances of particular

categories• Notes them down as they occur• Either live or from recording

Page 12: Sharing program chapter 7

Why systematize?

• Research observation is an intentional activity, not reactive noticing

• Intentional observation implies planning and the use of some previously established categories

• Coding system is in widespread use: checklist approach

Page 13: Sharing program chapter 7

The Advantages of a coding system approach

1) Easier than paper recording

2) Enables comparisons with other studies and generalization

3) Tailor made for a particular problem

4) Simple analysis

5) Established patterns of interaction and development

6) Established personal patterns of a particular teacher and learner

7) Possible to train observers

Page 14: Sharing program chapter 7

The Disadvantages of Coding System Approach

1) Involves editing: reduction of the data

2) The preselected categories may not be the relevant ones

3) Cannot take into account relevant but unobserved shared knowledge

Page 15: Sharing program chapter 7

Kind of analysis

• High- Inference CategoriesAn observer has to make considerable effort

of judgment to decide whether a range of behaviors constitute a category

Page 16: Sharing program chapter 7

Kind of analysis

• Low-Inference Categories Using a description of observable facts or

events, without interpretation. Uses a low degree of subjectivity. Just the facts, not an opinion. A factual observation, not a judgment.

Page 17: Sharing program chapter 7

Published or Invented Categories

• There is no need to rely on published literatures for categories

• A researcher can develop his or her own for some particular research purpose

• For example: a teacher researcher might be interested in the possible effects of different strategies for giving oral feedback or intervening about an error in spoken performance.

Page 18: Sharing program chapter 7

Analysis of codings

Coded transcripts of classes can be analyzed in several ways

1. By counting frequency: the relative frequency of each kind of

behavior is set out in tabular form Conclusion is drawn from the overall picture

2. By finding patterns Soliciting answers→nominating a pupil

→receiving an answer→checking with another pupil→praise

Page 19: Sharing program chapter 7

Live Observation or Recording

• Any form of observation distorts normality• Live observation

– Distract the attention of students and teacher• Recording

– Distract attention– Microphones are more limited than human ears– Voices on the recording are less easy to identify

• Video– Camera equipment also distract and possibly invite

strange behavior

Page 20: Sharing program chapter 7

Alternatives to Coding Schemes

• Recording and field notes– Record a lesson and transcribe it using field

notes taken at the time of recording • Text analysis

– makes qualitative research faster and easier by highlighting important terms and categorizing open-ended responses.

– The ability to analyze what respondents say helps gain insight into their attitudes, behaviors, concerns, motivations, and culture.

Page 21: Sharing program chapter 7

Alternatives to Coding Schemes

• Stimulated recall– A recording is made of the lesson or class to

be observed– Interpretation of the observation is made with

the teacher and students– The researcher freezes the recording at a

point and ask them to memorize

Page 22: Sharing program chapter 7

Naturalistic Observation

• Naturalistic observation is:– a research tool in which a subject is observed

in its natural habitat without any manipulation by the observer.

– During naturalistic observation researchers take great care to avoid interfering with the behavior they are observing by using unobtrusive methods.

Page 23: Sharing program chapter 7

Naturalistic Observation

• In contrast to analog observation which is– a research tool by which a subject is observed in

an artificial setting. – Typically, types of settings in which analog

observation is utilized include clinical offices or research laboratories,

– can be made in any artificial environment, – even if the environment is likely to encounter

naturally.

Page 24: Sharing program chapter 7

Naturalistic Observation

• In contrast to – Contrived– Manipulated– Experimental

• Data are based on– Everyday lessons– Usual participants– In real time

Page 25: Sharing program chapter 7

Two corollaries

• First: Crucial context:– It sites the phenomenon of study in space and

time– It taps into fluctuating interactions and

relationship patterns• Second: the naturalistic observer:

– Multiple perspectives of those observed– Seek to interpret rather than avoid them

Corollary: something that results from something else

Page 26: Sharing program chapter 7

Dealing with Data

• To capture the natural setting:– The techniques used will be at the open, less

structured end of the methodology• The principal data-gathering instrument

will be description:– The aim is producing thick data (as

comprehensive as possible) in terms of individuals, interactions, behavior and setting

Page 27: Sharing program chapter 7

Analyzing Data

1. The data are examined and reexamined to foreground recurrent patterns.

2. Description can be selective and focused– For example: A teacher researcher may have

already decided that Student A is problematic

– He/she takes descriptive notes in class– Another teacher, unsure about its efficacy,

might invite a colleague to examine how he/she sets up pair work