sharing good practice · qualitative –unicef bfi initiative feedback from parents stated that...
TRANSCRIPT
Sharing Good PracticeInteragency approaches
Cathy McLaughlinMidwife & Antenatal Education Co-ordinator
WHSCT(Altnagelvin Area Hospital)
And
Margaret FisherMidwife on secondment to SureStart by WHSCT
Development of The Infant Mental (IMH) Health Strategy
How it affected midwifery practice
Other aspects of care that have married into this approach
Improving Outcomes–What Changed our Approach.
Antenatal education classes
SureStart community based services delivered by midwives and health visitors in partnership with others
HypnoBirthing & Aquanatal exercise
Solihull approach
UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiatives
Weigh to a Healthy Pregnancy
What we do
Nurturing parents
Baby brain development
Early Relationship building
Parenting skills
Aims of these models
SureStart
Family Nurse Partnership / Teenage Pregnancy Coordinator
Regional Obesity Project
Maternity Services Liaison Committees
Breastfeeding Peer Support Project
Health Improvement Department
Community & Voluntary Sector Agencies
Interagency Approaches
What supports good brain development?
Good antenatal care
Positive interactions
Security & stability
Needs being met consistently, physically & emotionally
Good quality stimulation & experiences
7
It is an integrated theoretical model
It brings together 3 theories (Containment, Reciprocity and Behaviour Management) to provide a way of thinking about relationships
It supports professionals in their work with families
children’s and parents’ emotional relationship
parent-child relationship as it affects brain development (in particular emotional development) in the foetus and baby MF
What is the Solihull approach?
1. To increase knowledge of the underpinning evidence and theories in:
I. Baby brain development
II. Containment
III. Reciprocity
IV. Behaviour management
V. How the above links to Attachment Theory
2. To think about how each area can help in your approach to working with families and children
3. To use understanding of above to increase effectiveness of interventions & outcomes for children
MF
Learning Outcomes
SureStart Edenballymore
• Covers 7 electoral wards Derry City Council Area-urban
• 1241 currently registered adults
• 1158 children registered on SureStart Database
•All SureStart wards fall within top 10% most deprived electoral wards in Northern Ireland
•1 in 5 births are to teenage mothers
•40% of babies born to mothers who smoke
Services OfferedCommunity Drop in Service for
pregnant womenAnte & Post Natal Aqua-
AerobicsBaby MassageBaby Yoga Baby ReflexologyBaby Aqua
Increased attendance at classes and sustained attendance
Increased use of HypnoBirthingtechniques
Unicef Baby Friendly Re accreditation
Solihull training for staff in WHSCT
Evidence
Qualitative –UNICEF BFI Initiative feedback from parents stated that 85%of them were happy with their care.
10,000 voices – showed a very good result from local Maternity experience
Continuous patient evaluation via Trust Facebook and ‘Twitter’.
Evidence to support we are on the right track
Continue to implement the IMH Strategy in our practice
Funding for other initiatives ,e.g. Post natal aqua aerobics
Antenatal Nurturing Programme within SureStart initiatives
EITP –Early Intervention Transformation Programme
Where do we go from here
Parent/Carer Facilitator Role
• Engage with parents from first initial contact
• Support Parents in their vital parental role
• Identify individual needs and work together to accomplish goals
• Provide a bridge between Early years setting and home Environment
Effective ways to engage parents
• coffee mornings
• one to one sessions
• home visits
• drop-in service
• social media mechanisms.
Variety of formal supports
• Links to Public Health Nurse
• Links to SLT
• Links to Primary Health Care Team
• Link to community and family support agency
Varity of informal supports
• Parent and toddler groups
• Parents Plus Community course
• Come dine with me
• Guest speakers
• Adult Educational workshop
Strengthening links between Early years, home and
Primary school
• Sharing of information between home and Early years setting
• School Registration
• Transition to school programme
• Linking parents with Home-School Liaison officer
Benefits of Engaging Parents
• Parents actively involved in their child’s education
• Stronger links between Early years service and the home
environment• Building stronger positive
communication within the family
• Creating pathways to community awareness
Research
• significant improvements in the Home Learning Environment (HLE)
• a positive effect on family relationships and an improvement
in parenting skills
• especially in relation to other children within the family
Parental Comments
• “I felt I could go to (PCF) at any time to discuss things about my child, or just to
have a general chat”
• ‘‘Loved hearing everyone's examples and experience’’
• PCF ‘‘listened to each of us and gave great ideas to try at home’’
• ‘‘I found myself giving advise to my friends after doing the Parents Plus course’’
Conclusion
• positive parenting improves child outcomes
• this is only made possible through effective and quality
parental engagement
Bibliography
http://www.twcdi.ie/images/uploads/general/CDI-Early_Years_Report_24.01-web.pdf).
Parental Comments.
Effective Inter-agency Working to Support Families & Children – The
Common Sense Parenting Programme
Liam White: PPFS
Mary O Malley: ADPHN
County Mayo
Presentation content
Background to Common Sense Parenting
Description of Common Sense Parenting
Contents of Common Sense Parenting
Effective Inter-agency Working implementing CSP
Background to Common Sense Parenting in Mayo
Local initiative in 2005 in relation to adopting a family
support programme from the Boystown organisation
in United States.
Boystown one of the largest child care providers in
the US. Residential, secure care, foster care, In-
Home Family Services and Common Sense
Parenting Programme.
Local research completed, reciprocal site visits.
Boystown model adopted and introduced in 2007
Background to Common Sense Parenting
Initially introduced the In-Home Family
Services Model or Family Preservation
Model in Mayo and Roscommon.
Staff specifically trained-up in use of model
which included specific skills, methods of
assessment, family service plans and model
fidelity checks
Programme named Mol an Oige
Background to Common Sense Parenting programme
In 2007/2008 began to roll out Common Sense parenting.
Immediate feedback from service users and practitioners was very positive and demand for the programme increased.
Now providing 15-20 CSP per year across Mayo
Description of the Programme
Two types of CSP programme.
2-5 yr old programme. This is rolled out by
Public Health Nurses ( 19 trained PHN`S)
6-16yr old programme. This is rolled out by
child care staff (30 STAFF)
CSP Programme Content
Two facilitators
Programme duration 6 x 2 hour sessions
Text Book
Personal parenting plan
Videos
Role play
Inter-active
Fee E20
CSP Programme content
Parent are teachers- describing behaviours and using consequences to change behaviours.
Encouraging good behaviours- giving children reasons, using effective praise
Preventing problems – social skills, using preventive teaching to set kids up for success
Correcting problem behaviour and teaching alternative behaviours.
Teaching self-control, Safety plans
Putting it all together – family meetings, routines and developing a plan for use of all skills
Effective Inter-agency working to implement CSP
Public Health Nurses deliver – 2-5yr
programme.
Also Joint programmes co-delivered with
Child Care staff.
A wide range of Child Care practitioners
deliver the 6-16 yrs programme
Effective Inter-agency working to implement CSP
Community Based Family Support Workers (Tulsa Funded, located in FRC`s)
Foroige staff
Child Care Leaders – Social Work Dept
Mayo Rape Crisis Centre
Juvenile Justice Project
Western Regional Drugs Task Force
Child & Adolescent Mental Health Service
CSP Programme content
Mayo Rape Crisis Centre – Six modules and one additional module that relates to their specific client group.
Western Regional Drugs Task Force – Six modules and one additional module that relates to their specific client group.
Developing CSP programme aimed specifically at traveller parents – this is to address issues where literacy might be a barrier.
CSP in context of Direct provision hostel.
CSP in context of a prison.
Benefits of effective inter-agency working to support families and children
Developed closer partnerships between disciplines.
Set up local inter-agency subgroup to oversee
implementation of CSP.
Common more integrated approach by a range of
services to supporting parents/families
Sense of shared professional strategy – all using the
same programme.
The Benefits of using CSP
CSP programme endeavours to provide support to all parents who require or request support.
CSP Programme is a preventative intervention –links in well with the development of LAPS and Meitheal –e.g could be part of a Meitheal plan.
It may be the case that some individual parents need more intensive input or referral on to another service.
Common Sense parenting and the 50 key messages to improve outcomes
Very strong on parent-child relationship.
Provides parents with a positive parenting
style.
Promotes positive role-modelling by parents
Assists parents to problem-solve
Feedback from parents is that they enjoy
programme and it helps them.
Common Sense Parenting
CSP currently being formally evaluated by the Child
and Family Research Centre, NUIG – This will
involve 300 parents in this evaluation.
Work towards modifying our programme and making
it more consistent with national parenting support
strategy and the 50 key messages supporting
parents to improve outcomes for children.
Routes of referral to CSP
CSP universally available across Mayo. This reduces stigma, preventative and can be beneficial – shared learning/role modelling.
Parents can self-refer.
Some targeted referrals; S.W, CAMH,PSY
Parents referred as part of child protection plan
Other agencies: FRC, Schools, JLO,
Strengthening Families: An Interagency Approach to Supporting Parents and their
FamiliesCliodhna Mahony
Chair, National Strengthening Families Council of Ireland
Supporting Parents Conference, CES, February 2015
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Overview of SFP
Development
• Developed by Dr. Karol Kumpfer (Utah, USA) in 1982
• 1st research-based family programme for substance abusing parents and their children (6-11 years)
• Dissemination in 35 countries through Alta Institute (formerly LutraGroup) (USA)
• 1994 universal ages 10-14 (7 weeks, UK, “Iowa” model)
• 2004 at-risk ages 12-16• 2006 at-risk Ages 3-5
(effective with universal also) • 2012 – DVD for home use (8-16
years)
International Evidence• 8 Independent randomized
control trials
• 10 RCT’s
• Over 100 quasi-experimental
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
What is SFP?
Description A 14-week skills
based programme for parents/carers and their teens / children
Booster session 3/6 months post programme
Internationally recognisedevidence –based family
prevention programme.
Aim• To prevent substance use
and other adverse behavioural outcomes.
• Improve parenting and family functioning
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Ire
lan
d
SFP Structure• 1 evening per week 3 skills course: Parenting,
Teens/Children, & Family Skills
Family Dinner
1 Hour Simultaneously
+
1 Hour
Teen / Children Parents/Carers
Family Group
• Childcare (0-12 years)• Incentives• Transport
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
SFP Outcomes (USA)Parent Skills :
• Improves: Parenting skills, efficacy, confidence, monitoring & supervision as well as parent-child involvement
• Decreases: negative child behaviour, overt and covert aggression and conduct disorders
Children's Skills
• Improves: school results, social competencies (communication, problem-solving, peer resistance, anger & behaviour control)
Family Skills:
• Improves: family attachment & bonding, harmony, communication, organisation, family strengths and resilience
All 3 together: 1)Reduces alcohol and drug use or initiation into.2) Improves protective factors and decreases risk factors
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
SFP in Ireland
Unique Community Based Interagency
Model Utah Model –14 weeks
(dose effect)
Manual Adaptations
9 years (2007-present)
SFP 12-16**SFP 6-11
National SFP Council of Ireland
Supported by National Policy
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Estimated 60 SFP sites across Ireland
Family Support Levels 1-3
National Council MembershipName Organisation
1 Cliodhna Mahony (Chair) Ballymun LDATF2 Anne Conroy Le Chéile, Mentoring and Youth Justice Support
3 Sunniva Finlay Ballyfermot STAR4 Patsy Moran Addiction Response Crumlin5 Donna Butler (Vice Chair) Families Matter, Alcohol Forum6 Marie Lawless & Roisin Byrne Ballymun LDATF
7 Thomas O’Donnell Tusla, Child & Family Agency, Geraldstown House
8 Leona Scott/Emmett Lynch Derry Healthy Cities
9 Valerie Scully / Patricia Levins Foróige (Tallaght SFP)
10 Joan Bolger (Interim Vice Chair Regional Framework Support Agency
11 Rosemary Fox / Gemma O’Leary
Young Persons Probation (Cork SFP)/ Cork Local Drugs & Alcohol Task Force
12 Rachel Browne Empowerment Plus SFP Coordinator (Western Region)
13 Joe Slattery CSMT (Limerick)14 Cathryn O’Reilly Finglas / Cabra Resource Centre
15 Cathy Whelan / Patricia Egan Meath Community Drug and Alcohol Services (Meath SFP)
16 Miriam Galvin Kerry ETB17 Ciara Jubani Blanchardstown LDATF
18 Jacki Thompson Dublin North City and County RDATF
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Evidence / Reviews in Ireland
• Analysis of 200 high risk families (who completed SFP (12-16) across Ireland showed statistically significant positive results in all variables (parent, teen and family variables) (2012).
• Teen Gender Analysis (2008 – 2014) of 327 teens in Ireland, & compared to USA teens showed:• Statistically significant positive results for all variables (parent, teen
and family) (higher effect sizes than USA)• Boys and girls benefitted equally except:
• Boys benefitted more in overt aggression • Parents of boys benefitted more in Parental Supervision• Conflict reduced more in families with boys.
• SFP reviewed in CFA document “ What Works in Family Support” (2013)
• Numerous local outcome and process evaluations since 2007 (incl 3 year report, teen report…).
• Feedback anecdotally from communities, participants, agencies…
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Community Based Interagency Implementation –Ballymun
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Ballymun SFP
Funding
Evaluations
SFP Interagency
Team
Follow Up Support
Management Committee
Referrals and Process
Policies & Procedures
Programme Manager &
Site Coordinator
Ballymun Interagency
Network
National SFP Council of
Ireland
Benefits of Interagency
Benefits to agencies• Facilitates community
“buy-in”• Facilitates strong
relationships agency to agency (increases knowledge).
• Shared expertise.• Improved relationships
with families – strengths based approach.
• Integrates with current work
Benefits to Families• Reduces barriers to local
agencies.
• Increases connectedness with the community.
• Exposure to various expertise/resources on site and access further supports.
• Demonstrates community wide support – increased engagement with education, training and other community projects.
• Opportunity to increase skills.
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Ballymun Case Study• 7 Years completed (2015 – 8th year)
• 19 Programmes to Date
• 180 Families have Graduated
• 130 Local Agency Reps and Volunteers Trained (incl 2 parent graduates)
• 20-25 agencies involved in programmes in various roles.
• Parent Advocate Role Began in 2012
• 2 programmes per year
• Local SFP Trainers
• National SFP Council of Ireland
• Presented at international conferences 1st Family Based Prevention Conference, Slovenia & EUSPR in Majorca.
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Ballymun 7 year follow up (2008-2014)
SFP Parent Skills Always Sometimes Never
I communicate about drugs and alcohol 80.4% 17.4% 2.2%
I give clear directions to my teen 78.3% 21.7% -
I set clear boundaries for my teen 73.9% 23.9% 2.2%
I reward & notice good behaviour 67.4% 32.6% -
I communicate about relationships and sexuality 65.2% 30.5% 4.3%
I use good speaking and listening skills 58.7% 41.3% -
I set clear goals and objectives 50% 47.8% 2.2%
I use my skills to handle stress better 50% 47.8% 2.2%
I follow through on consequences
(e.g. punishment, removing privileges)
47.8% 43.5% 8.7%
I spend quality time with my teen 43.5% 50% 6.5%
I use problem solving skills 36.9% 60.9% 2.2%
I ignore bad behaviour (where safe to do so) 31.8% 52.3% 15.9%
I use behaviour change contracts 19.1% 47.6% 33.3%
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Sample Survey responses (adults)
58%
40%
2% 0% 0%
Helped improve my relationship with my family
Strongly agree Agree
Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
Strongly disagree
56%
38%
6%
0% 0%
Helped my family to communicate better
Strongly agree Agree
Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
Strongly disagree
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
49%
38%
11%
2% 0%
Made my family stronger and better able to deal with
problems
Strongly agree Agree
Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
Strongly disagree
96%
2%2%
Has SFP made a difference in your life or that of your
family?
Yes No Unsure
What young people said:
• Young People:
• (Family life) “I didn’t think it was going to help because everyone was always arguing before and now we talk to each other. We don’t argue anymore. It is a lot quieter house now”
• “It got our family closer together than it actually was…ever since we are communicating better and going out together.”
• (School)“It helps you cop on more. If someone is messing with you, just step away and don’t get in trouble because someone is acting the eejit”.
• (Parents) “Me ma deals with things better than before”
• “I have great parents…instead of giving out to you they listen to both sides of the story and sort things out”
• (Linking in) “I got involved in Comhairle na nÓg. The programme made me realise I have to make something of my life…”
• “It teaches you how to respect them (neighbours) and not just your parents”
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
Conclusion
• SFP is an effective evidence based programme to support parents and their families.
• Ireland has effectively and successfully implemented a unique interagency community based implementation model which has had positive ripple effects throughout each community.
• By involving children and parents together in a family process, family protective factors enhance the building of communication, bonding, attachment, love, support and reduce risk factors such as conflict, d&a use, and criminal behaviour.
• Challenges going forward will involve ongoing support for SFP locally and through the NSFPC; local community sustainability (buy-in, supply vs demand);
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and
References
• Kumpfer, K.L., Xie, J., O’Driscoll, R. (2012) Effectiveness of a culturally adapted Strengthening Families Programme 12-16 years for high risk Irish families. Child and Youth Care Forum, 41 (2), pp. 173-195 Sage Publications.
• Kumpfer, K.L., Xie, J., Cofrin-Allen, K., Lawless, M., Mahony, C. (2014). A teen gender analysis of SFP (12-16) in Ireland. (Presented on behalf of NSFPC at EUSPR Conference 2014, Palma Mallorca).
• Child & Family Agency. (2013). What Works in Family Support.
• Ballymun Local Drugs and Alcohol Task Force. (2015). A 7 Year Longitudinal Follow Up Study of SFP (12-16) in Ballymun.
Nat
ion
al S
FP C
ou
nci
l of
Irel
and