shad valley mcmaster - in-class debate rules

Upload: andrew-colgoni

Post on 30-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Shad Valley McMaster - In-Class Debate Rules

    1/1

    Debate - Canadas Aging Population

    Topics

    1. The aging population is a burden on society.

    2. The senior majority (of 2030) should dictate and set the priorities of society

    (medical, financial, etc.).

    Preparation

    All groups have 1/2 hour to prepare their initial argument, which is not to

    exceed 5 minutes in length.

    Your arguments ought to be based on fact where possible, so attempt to locate

    reputable sources. Making arguments based on incorrect information will leave

    you open for easy rebuttal.

    The setup For each topic, the pro side will provide a maximum 5 minute uninterrupted

    argument, followed immediately by the argument from the con side (also

    maximum 5 minutes).

    There will be a 3-minute recess where each group can prepare a rebuttal, the

    delivery of which should not exceed 3 minutes. The con side will be the first to

    offer rebuttal, which is, again, uninterrupted. This will be followed by the pro

    sides rebuttal.

    A straw vote (by show of hands) will be taken immediately after the debate closes

    to determine which side made the strongest argument.

    Participation

    Determine which of your group will be the speakers, note-takers (creating initial

    points; in preparation for rebuttal), researchers (to source facts), etc. Look to each

    others strengths.

    All members are expected to participate in the preparation and research.

    2 or more members may deliver the argument and the rebuttal. Please have

    different speakers for each section.

    Rules of Engagement

    When one side is speaking, they are to speak uninterrupted. Interruptions will lead

    to time deductions.

    Be civil. You will not make your argument stronger by name-calling or insults.

    During rebuttal, speak directly to the statements of the opposing viewpoint. The

    other team makes the argument that __________________, however they neglect to

    mention ________________.

    July 6, 2010