sex differences in antisocial behaviors from … › files › prod › news_files › 223 ›...

1
Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviors from Adolescence to Early Adulthood: A Test of the General Theory of Crime Marie-Pier Robitaille, 1 Isabelle Ouellet-Morin, 1,2 Franca Cortoni, 1,3 Eric Lacourse, 1,2 Sylvana M. Côté, 1,2 Frank Vitaro 1,2 & Richard E. Tremblay 1,2 11-8 - 57% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Adolescence Adulthood Portion of Sex Differences Explained by Self-Control Participants N = 3007 (1587 males and 1420 females) from the Quebec longitudinal study of kindergarten children. Self-Reported Measures and Clinical Interviews Official measures Juvenile (12 – 17 y.) and adult (18 – 26 y.) criminal records. Analyses Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA) Hierarchical and Zero Inflated NegaGve Binomial (ZINB) regressions LogisGc regressions and General Linear Models (GLM) Method 6 – 12 years 13 years 15 years 20 – 23 years Informants Mother, Teachers ParGcipant ParGcipant ParGcipant Instruments Social Behavior Ques0onnaire (SBQ) Self-Reported Delinquency Ques0onnaire (SRDQ) Diagnos0c Interview Schedule (DIS) for Children Calendar approach DIS R-Conflict Tac0cs Scale Measures Poor self-control Overall offending Violent behaviors Against property Vandalism Conduct disorder Overall offending Violent behaviors Against property AnGsocial personality desorder (ASPD) InGmate partner violence (IPV) Poor self-control HyperacGvity Irritability ReacGve Aggression Impulsivity DistracGon NOTES. Standardized. χ2 = 5.722, df = 2, p ≤ 0.05. RMSEA = 0.025, CFI = 1.000, TLI = .998, SRMR = 0.004. ***p < 0.001 . 75*** (.01) . 70*** (.01) .74*** (.03) .98*** (.01) .68*** (.01) Objectives 1) Test whether SC is similarly associated with AB in males and females; 2) Test if SC explains the enGrety of differences between these two groups. Introduction Factor Loading to the Estimation of Poor Self-Control using CFA Antisocial Behavior in Adolescence According to Sex Results 0 20 40 60 80 100 Overall offending Violent behaviors Aainst property Vandalism Conduct disorder Criminal record Violent offence Non-violent offence Boys Girls *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Antisocial Behavior in Adulthood According to Sex 0 20 40 60 80 100 Overall offending Violent behavior Against property AnGsocial personality disorder InGmate partner violence Criminal record Violent offence Non-violent offence Men Women n.s. ** *** *** * *** *** *** Sex Differences in Self-Control * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 Poor self-Control Girls Boys t = 15.27 *** p < 0.001 *** Distinction between the Frequency/Diversity VS Occurrence of AB The Specific Case of Intimate Partner Violence Conclusions More women than men used both psychological and physical IPV; At equal levels of SC, women engage in even more IPV than men. Boys and men engaged in more an<social behaviors than girls and women, with the excepGon of inGmate partner violence. This sex difference varied according to developmental periods, nature of the behaviors and type of measures; The associaGon between self-control and anGsocial behaviors was similar for males and females in both adolescence and adulthood; Results suggest that self-control was mainly associated with the frequency/diversity of AB, rather than with its presence/absence; Self-control IS NOT the sole driving force behind sex differences in anGsocial behaviors. Implications It persists when sex is controlled for. REFERENCES. Fergusson, DM., Boden, JM. & Horwood, LJ. (2013). Childhood Self-Control and Adult Outcomes: Results from a 30-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 52(7):709–17.|Gonredson, MR & Hirschi, T. (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Standford, California: Standford University Press.|Moffiq, TE., Arseneault, L., Belsky,D., Dickson, N., Hancox, Harrington, H., Houts, R., et al. (2011). A Gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety. Proceedings of the Na0onal Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(7):2693–98.|Moffiq, TE., Caspi A., Ruqer, M. & Silva, PA. (2001). Sex Differences in An0social Behavior: Conduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.|Praq, TC. & Cullen, FT. (2000). The Empirical Status of Gonredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: A Meta-Analysis. Criminology 38(3):931–64.|Ruqer, M., Caspi, A. & Moffiq, TE. 2003. Using Sex Differences in Psychopathology to Study Causal Mechanisms: Unifying Issues and Research Strategies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 44(8):1092–1115.| Other factors that biologically and socially differenGate males and females should be taken into account in order to understand sex differences in anGsocial behaviors. Self-control is a risk factor for both males and females, parGcularly so in those who are engaged in trajectories depicGng more frequent and severe anGsocial behaviors. 1 University of Montreal 2 Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment 3 International Center for Comparative Criminology SC was only associated with the frequency and/or diversity of anGsocial behavior, but not with their simple occurrence (presence/absence). Males and Females do not differ regarding their associations between SC and AB Self-Control is associated with all Antisocial Behaviors (r s = .05 to .21, p s < 0.05) In A General Theory of Crime, Gonredson and Hirschi (1990) proposed that self-control (SC) is the main risk factor predicGng individual differences in criminal behavior, and between males and females. To date: It is mainly accepted that women commit fewer crimes than men; There is strong empirical support for the associaGon linking SC and anGsocial behaviors (AB) over Gme and on a variety of outcomes. However: Few studies have tested whether this associaGon is sexually dimorphic, most showing that SC exerts a similar influence on males’ and females’ AB; The sex gap in AB persists auer controlling for SC, and vary according to developmental periods, nature of the behaviors and type of measures.

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviors from … › files › prod › news_files › 223 › ...Sex Differences in An0social Behavior: Conduct Disorder, Delinquency, and Violence

Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviors from Adolescence to Early Adulthood: A Test of the General Theory of Crime

Marie-Pier Robitaille,1 Isabelle Ouellet-Morin,1,2 Franca Cortoni,1,3 Eric Lacourse,1,2 Sylvana M. Côté,1,2 Frank Vitaro1,2 & Richard E. Tremblay1,2

11-8

- 57%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60% Adolescence Adulthood

Portion of Sex Differences Explained by Self-Control

Participants N = 3007 (1587 males and 1420 females) from the Quebec longitudinal study of kindergarten children.

Self-Reported Measures and Clinical Interviews

Official measures Juvenile(12–17y.)andadult(18–26y.)criminalrecords.

Analyses ConfirmatoryFactorialAnalysis(CFA)HierarchicalandZeroInflatedNegaGveBinomial(ZINB)regressionsLogisGcregressionsandGeneralLinearModels(GLM)

Method

6–12years 13years 15years 20–23yearsInformants Mother,Teachers ParGcipant ParGcipant ParGcipant

Instruments

SocialBehaviorQues0onnaire

(SBQ)

Self-ReportedDelinquencyQues0onnaire

(SRDQ)

Diagnos0cInterview

Schedule(DIS)forChildren

CalendarapproachDIS

R-ConflictTac0csScale

Measures Poorself-control

OveralloffendingViolentbehaviorsAgainstproperty

Vandalism

Conductdisorder

OveralloffendingViolentbehaviorsAgainstproperty

AnGsocialpersonalitydesorder(ASPD)

InGmatepartnerviolence(IPV)

Poorself-control

HyperacGvity Irritability ReacGveAggression Impulsivity DistracGon

NOTES.Standardized.χ2=5.722,df=2,p≤0.05.RMSEA=0.025,CFI=1.000,TLI=.998,SRMR=0.004.***p<0.001

.75***(.01)

.70***(.01)

.74***(.03) .98***

(.01) .68***(.01)

Objectives 1) TestwhetherSCissimilarlyassociatedwithABinmalesandfemales;2) TestifSCexplainstheenGretyofdifferencesbetweenthesetwogroups.

Introduction Factor Loading to the Estimation of Poor Self-Control using CFA

Antisocial Behavior in Adolescence According to Sex Results

0

20

40

60

80

100

Overalloffending

Violentbehaviors

Aainstproperty

Vandalism Conductdisorder

Criminalrecord

Violentoffence

Non-violentoffence

Boys

Girls

***

*** ***

***

******

******

Antisocial Behavior in Adulthood According to Sex

0

20

40

60

80

100

Overalloffending

Violentbehavior

Againstproperty

AnGsocialpersonalitydisorder

InGmatepartnerviolence

Criminalrecord

Violentoffence

Non-violentoffence

Men

Womenn.s.**

******

*

***

******

Sex Differences in Self-Control

*p<0.05**p<0.01***p<0.001

Poorself-Control

Girls

Boys

t=15.27***p<0.001

***

Distinction between the Frequency/Diversity VS Occurrence of AB

The Specific Case of Intimate Partner Violence

Conclusions

•  MorewomenthanmenusedbothpsychologicalandphysicalIPV;•  AtequallevelsofSC,womenengageinevenmoreIPVthanmen.

•  Boysandmenengagedinmorean<socialbehaviorsthangirlsandwomen,withtheexcepGonofinGmatepartnerviolence.Thissexdifferencevariedaccordingtodevelopmentalperiods,natureofthebehaviorsandtypeofmeasures;

•  TheassociaGonbetweenself-controlandanGsocialbehaviorswassimilarformalesandfemalesinbothadolescenceandadulthood;

•  Resultssuggestthatself-controlwasmainlyassociatedwiththefrequency/diversityofAB,ratherthanwithitspresence/absence;

•  Self-controlISNOTthesoledrivingforcebehindsexdifferencesinanGsocialbehaviors.

Implications It persists when sex is controlled for.

REFERENCES.Fergusson,DM.,Boden,JM.&Horwood,LJ.(2013).ChildhoodSelf-ControlandAdultOutcomes:Resultsfroma30-YearLongitudinalStudy.JournaloftheAmericanAcademyofChildandAdolescentPsychiatry52(7):709–17.|Gonredson,MR&Hirschi,T.(1990)AGeneralTheoryofCrime.Standford,California:StandfordUniversityPress.|Moffiq,TE.,Arseneault,L.,Belsky,D.,Dickson,N.,Hancox,Harrington,H.,Houts,R.,etal.(2011).AGradientofChildhoodSelf-ControlPredictsHealth,Wealth,andPublicSafety.ProceedingsoftheNa0onalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica108(7):2693–98.|Moffiq,TE.,CaspiA.,Ruqer,M.&Silva,PA.(2001).SexDifferencesinAn0socialBehavior:ConductDisorder,Delinquency,andViolenceintheDunedinLongitudinalStudy.NewYork,NY:CambridgeUniversityPress.|Praq,TC.&Cullen,FT.(2000).TheEmpiricalStatusofGonredsonandHirschi’sGeneralTheoryofCrime:AMeta-Analysis.Criminology38(3):931–64.|Ruqer,M.,Caspi,A.&Moffiq,TE.2003.UsingSexDifferencesinPsychopathologytoStudyCausalMechanisms:UnifyingIssuesandResearchStrategies.JournalofChildPsychologyandPsychiatry44(8):1092–1115.|

•  OtherfactorsthatbiologicallyandsociallydifferenGatemalesandfemalesshouldbetakenintoaccountinordertounderstandsexdifferencesinanGsocialbehaviors.

•  Self-controlisariskfactorforbothmalesandfemales,parGcularlysointhosewhoareengagedintrajectoriesdepicGngmorefrequentandsevereanGsocialbehaviors.

1University of Montreal 2 Research Unit on Children’s Psychosocial Maladjustment 3International Center for Comparative Criminology

SCwasonlyassociatedwiththefrequencyand/ordiversityofanGsocialbehavior,butnotwiththeirsimpleoccurrence(presence/absence).

Males and Females do not differ regarding their associations

between SC and AB

Self-Control is associated with all Antisocial Behaviors

(rs = .05 to .21, ps < 0.05)

InAGeneralTheoryofCrime,GonredsonandHirschi(1990)proposedthatself-control(SC)isthemainriskfactorpredicGngindividualdifferencesincriminalbehavior,andbetweenmalesandfemales.Todate:•  Itismainlyacceptedthatwomencommitfewercrimesthanmen;•  ThereisstrongempiricalsupportfortheassociaGonlinkingSCandanGsocialbehaviors(AB)overGmeandonavarietyofoutcomes.

However:•  FewstudieshavetestedwhetherthisassociaGonissexuallydimorphic,mostshowingthatSCexertsasimilarinfluenceonmales’andfemales’AB;

•  ThesexgapinABpersistsauercontrollingforSC,andvaryaccordingtodevelopmentalperiods,natureofthebehaviorsandtypeofmeasures.