settlements environmental design · historically speaking, man's ways of living and settling down...

4
Historically speaking, man's ways of living and settling down were sponta- neous; they were shaped by impinging natural environments. Early man ex- hibited little capacity for the deliberate organization of his surroundings. During the ages of our cultural evolution, how- ever, we have become increasingly capa- ble of intervening with nature. We are now assisted by a technology which is able to make us live and func- tion in environments (for example, outer space) totally alien to those that shaped us. The initial exhilaration that the im- age of technical omnipotence may have brought us is being dampened by two concerns. In the first place, man in his subjective experiences still relies on mechanisms of his early physical evolu- tion. The way we breathe, feed, move, and are aware of our senses is that of Cro-Magnon man. To what extent will man cease to be the measure of all things in an artificial technical world? In the second place, nature has certain ways to maintain a balance between her constituent elements. To what extent is man threatening his survival by tech- nical interference which produces results intolerant of nature's self-regulating mechanisms? Overpopulation, the threat of a final nuclear war, pollution, each of these results of our cultural progress, if unchecked, is capable of extinguishing human life. It is against this background that our AAAS General Symposium intends to highlight some of the considerations en- tering into environmental planning. The intensity and complexity of emerging dysfunctions in man-environ- ment systems has produced a historical situation in which we are, by necessity, becoming a planning culture. Planning, the process of satisfying a multitude of conflicting demands toward specific hu- man goals, is intrinsically difficult in our particular form of democracy. The polit- ical and economic milieu which pro- duced our technological sophistication is very often the same one which makes its effective utilization impossible. Thus the "technical" solution is rarely com- mensurate with the political and eco- nomic impingements which operate on environmental decisions. This is essen- tially the planner's dilemma. Identifying decision processes which bring about viable environmental states clearly rep- resents one class of technical issues re- quiring attention of the scientific com- munity. There is yet another class of is- sues which also require intensified study. Successful environmental design and management requires not only effective decision methods, but also a more com- prehensive understanding of functional relations wherein the social and be- havioral consequences of particular en- vironmental orders can be explained, predicted, and controlled toward the realization of individual and collective goals. Environment is a ubiquitous term em- ployed as a conceptual convenience by several disciplines as they set about to understand the effects of one system upon another. The environment of man is of primary and immediate concern, but this environment is composed of many interdependent subsystems with their own internal causal structures. Each discipline identifies environment as consisting of a particular set of varia- bles and at various levels of analysis, for example, a region, a city, an organism, a neuron. An integrated understanding of the ecology of man presents a formid- able problem indeed. The need for more sophisticated or- ganizational tools for ordering man- made environments-for systematically relating these to "natural" ecological systems-is manifest. Of equal concern is the interdependent need for an in- tegrated, functional understanding of the effects of man-made and natural en- vironments upon human social and be- 1186 Human Settlements and Environmental Design AAAS Symposium * 28-30 December 1969 * Boston measures upon environmental organiza- tion in a particular domain of current SCIENCE, VOL. 166 havioral outcomes. Specifically we must become more competent in understand- ing the interface between the various interacting environments and individual and collective human processes. Like individual and social behavior itself, this interface is frustratingly complex and difficult to deal with in the context of existing knowledge. Understanding of human biological and extrabiological phenomena required that man be taken apart; the task at hand requires that he now be put back together. We are thus witnessing an abundance of attempts to identify strategies for applying a dis- parate set of scientific and technical resources toward the resolution of physi- cal and social dysfunction, for such is the multivariate nature of the problem. The objective of this general symposium together with related AAAS meetings in the section on "The Design and Na- ture of Cities" is to develop an over- view of our environmental problems and possibilities, with emphasis upon the human arts and sciences, the environ- mental design disciplines, and methods whereby these resources interrelate to- ward a common purpose. The sessions are organized somewhat chronologically, that is, how our present sociophysical state evolved, what has gone wrong, what kinds of research are needed to respond, and some proposals for future environments. Session I will explore the origins of present environmental structures and ideologies; the evolution of physical ex- pressions of community and privacy. Our dichotomized thinking about nature and culture will be discussed and com- parisons and contrasts will be made between this and other cultures with regard to man-environment organiza- tions and interactions. Session II is intended to identify ex- tant environmental structures as these bear upon conflicts among existing be- havior patterns. Also to be explicated are disparities between these and broader social objectives. Having identified the disparities be- tween human intentions and their ac- complishments as these are affected by extant environmental structures, session III turns to certain areas of behavioral research as a basic resource in identify- ing means whereby more humanly rele- vant environments can be developed. Session IV then explores the implica- tions of empirically derived behavioral on June 15, 2021 http://science.sciencemag.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Historically speaking, man's ways ofliving and settling down were sponta-neous; they were shaped by impingingnatural environments. Early man ex-hibited little capacity for the deliberateorganization of his surroundings. Duringthe ages of our cultural evolution, how-ever, we have become increasingly capa-ble of intervening with nature.We are now assisted by a technology

    which is able to make us live and func-tion in environments (for example, outerspace) totally alien to those that shapedus. The initial exhilaration that the im-age of technical omnipotence may havebrought us is being dampened by twoconcerns. In the first place, man in hissubjective experiences still relies onmechanisms of his early physical evolu-tion. The way we breathe, feed, move,and are aware of our senses is that ofCro-Magnon man. To what extent willman cease to be the measure of allthings in an artificial technical world?In the second place, nature has certainways to maintain a balance between herconstituent elements. To what extent isman threatening his survival by tech-nical interference which produces resultsintolerant of nature's self-regulatingmechanisms? Overpopulation, the threatof a final nuclear war, pollution, each ofthese results of our cultural progress, ifunchecked, is capable of extinguishinghuman life.

    It is against this background that ourAAAS General Symposium intends tohighlight some of the considerations en-tering into environmental planning.The intensity and complexity of

    emerging dysfunctions in man-environ-ment systems has produced a historicalsituation in which we are, by necessity,becoming a planning culture. Planning,the process of satisfying a multitude ofconflicting demands toward specific hu-man goals, is intrinsically difficult in ourparticular form of democracy. The polit-ical and economic milieu which pro-

    duced our technological sophisticationis very often the same one which makesits effective utilization impossible. Thusthe "technical" solution is rarely com-mensurate with the political and eco-nomic impingements which operate onenvironmental decisions. This is essen-tially the planner's dilemma. Identifyingdecision processes which bring aboutviable environmental states clearly rep-resents one class of technical issues re-quiring attention of the scientific com-munity. There is yet another class of is-sues which also require intensified study.Successful environmental design andmanagement requires not only effectivedecision methods, but also a more com-prehensive understanding of functionalrelations wherein the social and be-havioral consequences of particular en-vironmental orders can be explained,predicted, and controlled toward therealization of individual and collectivegoals.

    Environment is a ubiquitous term em-ployed as a conceptual convenience byseveral disciplines as they set about tounderstand the effects of one systemupon another. The environment of manis of primary and immediate concern,but this environment is composed ofmany interdependent subsystems withtheir own internal causal structures.Each discipline identifies environmentas consisting of a particular set of varia-bles and at various levels of analysis, forexample, a region, a city, an organism,a neuron. An integrated understandingof the ecology of man presents a formid-able problem indeed.The need for more sophisticated or-

    ganizational tools for ordering man-made environments-for systematicallyrelating these to "natural" ecologicalsystems-is manifest. Of equal concernis the interdependent need for an in-tegrated, functional understanding of theeffects of man-made and natural en-vironments upon human social and be-

    1186

    Human Settlements and Environmental Design

    AAAS Symposium * 28-30 December 1969 * Boston

    measures upon environmental organiza-tion in a particular domain of current

    SCIENCE, VOL. 166

    havioral outcomes. Specifically we mustbecome more competent in understand-ing the interface between the variousinteracting environments and individualand collective human processes. Likeindividual and social behavior itself, thisinterface is frustratingly complex anddifficult to deal with in the context ofexisting knowledge. Understanding ofhuman biological and extrabiologicalphenomena required that man be takenapart; the task at hand requires that henow be put back together. We are thuswitnessing an abundance of attempts toidentify strategies for applying a dis-parate set of scientific and technicalresources toward the resolution of physi-cal and social dysfunction, for such isthe multivariate nature of the problem.The objective of this general symposiumtogether with related AAAS meetingsin the section on "The Design and Na-ture of Cities" is to develop an over-view of our environmental problems andpossibilities, with emphasis upon thehuman arts and sciences, the environ-mental design disciplines, and methodswhereby these resources interrelate to-ward a common purpose.The sessions are organized somewhat

    chronologically, that is, how our presentsociophysical state evolved, what hasgone wrong, what kinds of research areneeded to respond, and some proposalsfor future environments.

    Session I will explore the origins ofpresent environmental structures andideologies; the evolution of physical ex-pressions of community and privacy.Our dichotomized thinking about natureand culture will be discussed and com-parisons and contrasts will be madebetween this and other cultures withregard to man-environment organiza-tions and interactions.

    Session II is intended to identify ex-tant environmental structures as thesebear upon conflicts among existing be-havior patterns. Also to be explicatedare disparities between these and broadersocial objectives.Having identified the disparities be-

    tween human intentions and their ac-complishments as these are affected byextant environmental structures, sessionIII turns to certain areas of behavioralresearch as a basic resource in identify-ing means whereby more humanly rele-vant environments can be developed.Session IV then explores the implica-tions of empirically derived behavioral

    on June 15, 2021

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

  • [The Bettman Archives]

    I -

    Present

    [New York CityConventien andVisitors BuLreaui]

    Future

    The simplest form of the ideal Dynapolis. The expan-sion in one direction allows the center to expand with-out difficulty. [C. A. Doxiadis, in Cities of Destiny,McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1968]28 NOVEMBER 1969

    Past

    12187

    on June 15, 2021

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

  • social concern. It will focus on thesocioenvironmental factors influencing

    S the organization of and personal involve-ment in various life settings. The es-sential nature of home life, work, lei-sure, and recreation will be explored asa basis for the discussion.

    Session V addresses issues related tonew environmental orders which move

    outside conventional configurations.These new systems offer alternatives tohuman settlements as we know them.The emphasis in these discussions is onthe implementation of emerging scien-tific and technological developments inthe behavioral, biological, and social sci-ences, and the integration of these withinsights from artistic intuitions, subjec-

    tive viewpoints from our experientialworld, and environmental design andmanagement approaches.

    A. H. ESSERLetchworth Village,Thiells, New York

    R. G. STUDERPennsylvania State University,University Park

    Speakers and Topics

    1188

    Arranged by Aristide H. Esser;Gyorgy Kepes (M.I.T.); DavidLowenthal (American Geographi-cal Society); and Raymond G.Studer.

    28 December, Morning

    Session I: Historical Perspectives,David Lowenthal, chairman.

    Conflict and Concordance in Ex-planations of Nature, Clarence J.Glacken (University of Cajifornia,Berkeley).

    Envih onmental Ideals versusAmerican Institutions, Leo Marx(Amherst College).

    Nature, Art, and Utility in theMaking of the Landscape, Hugh A.Prince (University College, Lon-don).Dysfunction East and West: Com-

    parison and Contrast, Yi-Fu Tuan(University of Minnesota).Panel Discussants: J. Ralph Audy

    (San Francisco Medical School),Marvin W. Mikesell (University ofChicago), and William Koelsch(Clark University.)

    28 December, Afternoon

    Session II: Social Dysfunction andEnvironment: Some Harbingers ofCatastrophe, Aristide H. Esser,chairman.Some Juxtapositions: Urban-

    Rural, North-South, Black-White,Small Communities-Large Societies,Harold Haskins (Temple Univer-sity).

    Racially Changing Communities,Peter Labovitz (Harvard Universityand Arthur D. Little, Inc.).

    After Private Enterprise-WhatNext?, Robert Choate (Choate andAssociates).

    Panel Discussants: Matthew Du-

    SCIENCE, VOL. 166

    mond (National Institute of MentalHealth), Nathan Glazer HarvardUniversity), Bernard M. Kramer(Tufts University), Florence Shelton(Harvard University), ConstancePerin (University of Chicago),Stephen Carr (M.I.T.), and JohnBuggs (Urban Coalition).

    29 December, Morning

    Session III: Research into Envi-ronment and Behavior, LawrenceHeideman, Jr. (University of Penn-sylvania), chairman.Environmental Factors in Growth

    and Development, Richard Chase(Johns Hopkins University).The Human Environment as

    Manifest Behavior, Israel Gold-diamond (University of Chicago).

    The Impact on the Design Coin-munity of Research into Environ-ment and Behavior, Bernard Spring(C.C.N.Y.).

    Panel Discussants: Irwin Altman(University of Utah), Kenneth H.Craik (University of California,Berkeley), Ido de Groot (Univer-sity of Cincinnati), Andrew F.Euston, Jr. (U.S. Department ofHousing and Urban Development),Bernard Kaplan (Clark University),and Kevin Lynch (M.I.T.).

    29 December, Afternoon

    Session IV: Living Environmentsfor Work and Leisure, BeverlyDriver (University of Michigan).

    Recreation: A Generic or SpecificForm of Behavior?, Rolf Meyer-sohn (Herbert H. Lehman College).

    Influence of Early Environmenton Recreational Behavior, WilliamR. Catton, Jr. (University ofWashington) .

    Vacation Homes, Environmental

    Preferences, and Spatial Behavior,Larry W. Tombaugh (U.S. ForestService and North Carolina StateUniversity).

    Panel Discussants: Samuel Z.Klausner (University of Pennsyl-vania), William R. Burch, Jr. (YaleUniversity), James G. Kelly (Uni-versity of Michigan), Hugh C.Davis (University of Massachusetts),John B. Lansing (University ofMichigan), and Roy I. Wolfe (YorkUniversity, Ontario).

    30 December, Morning

    Session V: Future Environments,Jerome Wiesner (M.I.T.), chair-man.

    Comprehensive Designs for RuralLiving, Hassan Fathy (United ArabRepublic).

    Integrated Environmental Con-trol Systems, James Marston Fitch(Columbia University).

    Social Planning and Action in theLight of Alternative Futures, Don-ald Schon '(M.I.T.).

    30 December, Afternoon

    Technology and the Future City,John McHale (State University ofNew York, Binghamton).

    The Artists in EnvironmentalParticipation, GyorgyKepes (M.I.T.).

    Panel Discussants: Topper Ca-rew ("New Thing" Art & Archi-tecture Center, Washington, D.C.),Hermann H. Field (Tufts, NewEngland Medical Center), Carl 0.Hodge (University of Arizona),Karl J. Ingebritsen (Reston), AlfredKazin (author), Donlyn Lyndon(M.I.T.), Michael Michaelis (Ar-thur D. Little, Inc.), and RaymondG. Studer.

    I

    -1

    on June 15, 2021

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

  • Human Settlements and Environmental DesignA. H. Esser and R. G. Studer

    DOI: 10.1126/science.166.3909.1186 (3909), 1186-1188.166Science

    ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/166/3909/1186.citation

    PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions

    Terms of ServiceUse of this article is subject to the

    trademark of AAAS. is a registeredScienceAdvancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title

    (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for theScience

    of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.Copyright © 1969 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement

    on June 15, 2021

    http://science.sciencemag.org/

    Dow

    nloaded from

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/166/3909/1186.citationhttp://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissionshttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/terms-servicehttp://science.sciencemag.org/