session 1 instrumentation and monitoringcliffs.lboro.ac.uk/downloads/workshop...
TRANSCRIPT
Climate impact forecasting for slopes: are we getting the story right?
The fourth themed CLIFFS workshop, 3 July 2007
Holywell Conference Centre, Loughborough University
Session 1
Instrumentation and monitoring
Andrew Ridley
Geotechnical bservations
www.geo-observations.com
The presence of vegetation can lead to seasonal
effects that can give serviceability problems.
Numerical analysis also suggests that these seasonal
variations of pore water pressure can lead to stability
problems (Kovacevic et al. 2001).
The stability and serviceability of embankments in clay
The effect of cycling the suction at the surface on
the stability of a clay fill embankment
(after Kovacevic, Potts & Vaughan 2001)
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
����
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
������
���
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
��������
Deep standpipe to investigate underlying
ground water
Piezometers capable of measuring positive and negative
pore water pressures
Inclinometers to detect lateral movement
Extensometers to detect vertical movement
Instrumentation for investigating the stability of embankments
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
Displacement (mm)
0.68m
0.85m1.90m
3.00m
3.96m
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Displacement (mm)
0.14m
0.64m
1.14m
1.64m
Vertical displacement at toe
Outward displacement at toe
-10.0
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
09-Mar-06 11-Apr-06 14-May-06 16-Jun-06 19-Jul-06 21-Aug-06 23-Sep-06 26-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 31-Dec-06 02-Feb-07
piezometric head (m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Daily Rainfall (mm)
PWP at 0.64mbgl
-30
-20
-10
0
10
09-Mar-06 11-Apr-06 14-May-06 16-Jun-06 19-Jul-06 21-Aug-06 23-Sep-06 26-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 31-Dec-06 02-Feb-07
Displacement (mm)
-10
0
10
20
30
Displacement (mm)
1.51m
1.48m
1.90m
2.48m
4.09m
Vertical displacement at the top of the slope
Outward displacement at the top of the slope
At the top of the slope vertical displacements are greater than outward displacements
Scale
2m - Section
20mm - Deflection
40mm - Settlement
Summary of pore water pressures and displacements at the toe of an embankment
Scale
2m - Section
20mm - Deflection
40mm - Settlement
Summary of pore water pressures and displacements at the top of an embankment
Unloading will cause a reduction in the pore water
pressures, which may become negative.
The stability of cut slopes in clay
Negative pore pressures will improve stability.
The stability of cut slopes in clay
In some cases swelling due to the increase of pwp
will cause softening in the soil near the toe of the
slope, a plastic zone will develop and failure may
occur in a slope that was otherwise stable in the
static sense.
The effect of increasing pore water pressure on
the stability of a cut slope in clay
(after Potts, Kovacevic & Vaughan 1997)
Design charts to assess the potential for failure (after
Ellis and O’Brien, 2007)
The stability of cut slopes in clay
Instrumentation for investigating the stability of cut slopes
Piezometers capable of measuring positive and negative
pore water pressures to assess the profiles relative to the
long term equilibrium
Inclinometers at the toe for
detecting shear zones
1
3.8
10 20 30 40 50 60
horizontal distance from barrier (m)
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
elevation (m)
Tree Line
5
6
3
1
2
7
8
Long term equilibrium conditions
Weathered brown
London Clay
Unweathered blue
London Clay
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
2
4
6
8
10
Pore pressures measured in a highway cutting with surface vegetation
9 years after construction
1
3.8
10 20 30 40 50 60
horizontal distance from barrier (m)
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
elevation (m)
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Tree Line
Pore pressures measured in a highway cutting with surface vegetation
30 years after construction
1
3.8
10 20 30 40 50 60
horizontal distance from barrier (m)
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
elevation (m)
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Tree Line
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Pore pressures measured in a highway cutting with surface vegetation
30 years after construction
10mm Inclinometer
Deformation
2m - Slope
1
3
~ 5m
Displacements in a failed cut slope in Gault Clay
Pore water pressures can be positive or negative.
Deformations near the top of the slope are
principally vertical.Displacements near the toe are principally
lateral.
Embankments
Cuttings
Pore water pressures will initially be negative and
will, in time, become positive. Displacements will begin at the toe.
Displacements in the upper part of the slope
will occur suddenly and with little warning.
SUMMARY
Piezometers that can measure positive and
negative pore water pressures.Extensometers at the top of the slope.
Inclinometers and extensometers near the toe
of the slope.
Embankments
Cuttings
Analysis to identify if the slope is susceptible to
progressive failure.Piezometers that can measure positive and
negative pore water pressures.
SUMMARY
Inclinometers in the lower part of the slope.
Porous
Filter
Valve
Pressure
Sensor
Hydraulic
pipes
Data
Logger
5 cm
GeO flushable piezometers
for pore water pressures
(positive and negative)
PVC stemO'ring seals here
Epoxy seal here1 bar ceramic filter
Flushing
system
Electrical cable
Pressure Sensor
Borehole
Borehole
Piezometer Stem
Cement / Bentonite
Grout
Borehole
Piezometer Stem
Cement / Bentonite
Grout
Borehole
GeO piezometer sensor
and valve
Piezometer Stem
Insitu calibration
check using known
head of water
Open the valve to check calibration
Remove the sensor and valve to check zero and repair
Inclinometers
Manually read or real-time data logging?
Displacements are initially small and slow to develop.
Manually read is normally adequate but perform
baseline readings with two probes so displacements
(if they exist) can be verified.
In-place sensors can be used if displacement is
detected and it is rapid. Sensors only required above,
on and below the shear plane.
Absolute shape of inclinometer casing
Profile of casing in plane parallel to the track(positive values lie to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-900 -750 -600 -450 -300 -150 0 150 300 450 600 750 900
cumulative deviation relative to bottom of casing (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-05
Profile of casing in plane perpendicular to the track (positive values lie closer to the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-900 -750 -600 -450 -300 -150 0 150 300 450 600 750 900
cumulative deviation relative to bottom of casing (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-05
24cm
24cm
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Probe DI1090
Probe DI1090
Movement in plane perpendicular to the track(positive values indicate movement towards the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-06
Movement in plane parallel to the track(positive values indicate movement to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-06
(x = 0 axis represents profile on 13-04-05)
Displacement relative to base set of readings
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
24cm
24cm
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Probe DI1090
Probe DI1090
Baseline reading probe 1090 – run 1 Baseline reading probe 1090 – run 2
Absolute shape of inclinometer casing
Profile of casing in plane parallel to the track(positive values lie to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-900 -750 -600 -450 -300 -150 0 150 300 450 600 750 900
cumulative deviation relative to bottom of casing (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-05
Profile of casing in plane perpendicular to the track (positive values lie closer to the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-900 -750 -600 -450 -300 -150 0 150 300 450 600 750 900
cumulative deviation relative to bottom of casing (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-05
24cm
24cm
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Probe DI1179
Probe DI1179
Movement in plane perpendicular to the track(positive values indicate movement towards the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-06
Movement in plane parallel to the track(positive values indicate movement to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
13-Apr-06
(x = 0 axis represents profile on 13-04-05)
Displacement relative to base set of readings
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
24cm
24cm
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Probe DI1179
Probe DI1179
Baseline reading probe 1179 – run 1 Baseline reading probe 1179 – run 2
Movement in plane perpendicular to the track(positive values indicate movement towards the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
09-May-06
13-Jun-06
07-Jul-06
04-Aug-06
14-Sep-06
13-Oct-06
15-Nov-06
Movement in plane parallel to the track(positive values indicate movement to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
09-May-06
13-Jun-06
07-Jul-06
04-Aug-06
14-Sep-06
13-Oct-06
15-Nov-06
(x = 0 axis represents profile on 13-04-06)
Displacement relative to base set of readings
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
24cm
24cm
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Probe DI1090
Probe DI1090
Readings to Nov 2006 – probe 1090
Movement in plane perpendicular to the track(positive values indicate movement towards the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
15-Nov-06
Movement in plane parallel to the track(positive values indicate movement to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
15-Nov-06
(x = 0 axis represents profile on 13-04-05)
Displacement relative to base set of readings
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
24cm
24cm
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Probe DI1179
Probe DI1179
Reading in Nov 2006 – probe 1179
Movement in plane perpendicular to the track(positive values indicate movement towards the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
Probe 1179
Probe 1090
Movement in plane parallel to the track(positive values indicate movement to the right when facing the track)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cumulative displacement relative to baseline readings (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
Probe 1179
Probe 1090
(x = 0 axis represents profile on 13-04-05)
Displacement relative to base set of readings
Site Location : Pound Green Embankment
Inclinometer : BH32
Stickup : 24cm
: ArupClient
24cm
24cm
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
Broken lines indicate the range of random error
110°
+
+
T R A C K
Nov 06
Nov 06
Comparison of displacements with probe 1090 and probe 1179 – Apr 06 to Nov 06
Movement in plane perpendicular to the M25 Motorway.(positive values indicate movement towards the motorway)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
displacement (mm)
depth (m)
pre Apr 04
05-Apr-04
13-Apr-04
19-Apr-04
26-Apr-04
Movement in plane parallel to the M25 Motorway.
(positive values indicate movement to the right when facing the motorway)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
displacement (mm)
depth (m)
pre Apr 04
05-Apr-04
13-Apr-04
19-Apr-04
26-Apr-04
Displacement relative to base set of readings
(x = 0 axis represents profile on 07-05-03)
Site location : M25 - Junction 6 - Godstone
Inclinometer : BH4-06
Stick-up : + 35 cm
Client : Mouchel Parkman / Highways Agency
M25
+
+
348o
35cm
35cm
range of random error
range of random error
Displacement in the plane perpendicular to the motorway(positive values indicate movement towards the motorway)
Displacement in the plane parallel to the motorway(positive values indicate movement to right when facing the motorway)
Manual readings to identify where the shear surface is
-12.0
-10.0
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
14/03/2003 13/05/2003 12/07/2003 10/09/2003 09/11/2003 08/01/2004 08/03/2004 07/05/2004
Cumulative displacement (m
m)
5.65m
6.15m
6.65m
7.15m
Displacement verses time to assess the speed of movement
Figure B1 Location of inplace sensors
Site location: M25 - Junction 6 - Godstone
Inclinometer: BH4-06
Length of casing: 20m
Stick-up: + 35 cm
Client: Mouchel Parkman / Highways Agency
Profile of casing in plane parallel to the M25 Motorway.
(positive values to the right when facing the motorway)
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Cumulative deviation (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
Profile of casing in plane perpendicular to the M25 Motorway.
(positive values lie closer to the motorway)
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Cumulative deviation (mm)
depth below top of casing (m)
#1
#5
#4
#3
#2
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
M25
+
+
348o
Profile of casing in plane perpendicular to the motorway
(positive values lie closer to the motorway)
Profile of casing in plane parallel to the motorway
(positive values lie to the right when facing the motorway)
Place sensors above, on and below the shear plane
Displacement predominantly on the shear plane
Insertion tool
Spider Magnet
Flush access pipe
Insertion tool is used to push
the magnet to the required
depth. Sprung legs bend and
rest on borehole wall during
insertion
Insertion tool is pulled to
embed sprung legs into the
wall of the borehole
Insertion tool is withdrawn
leaving magnet in place
Borehole
GeO Magnet Extensometers for vertical movement
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
09-Mar-06 11-Apr-06 14-May-06 16-Jun-06 19-Jul-06 21-Aug-06 23-Sep-06 26-Oct-06 28-Nov-06 31-Dec-06 02-Feb-07
Settlement (m
m)
0.695 1.290 1.521 2.073 2.605 3.114 3.452 4.168 4.484 5.027 5.459 6.372
7.404 8.771
Site location: Pound Green Embankment
Extensometer: BH21
Client: Arup
Geotechnical bservations
www.geo-observations.com
Thank you