service life planning of building components the brazilian experience

60
Service life planning of building components: the brazilian experience Vera Fernandes Hachich Sócia gerente

Upload: ovelha

Post on 15-Nov-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Service Life Planning of Building Components the Brazilian Experience

TRANSCRIPT

  • Service life planning of building components: the brazilian experience

    Vera Fernandes Hachich Scia gerente

  • Themes of the lecture

    How to establish minimum criteria to SERVICE LIFE PREDICTION AND ASSESSMENT OF DURABILITY of building products

    The Brazilian Building Performance Standard

    Long-term performance evaluation of technological innovation the Brazilian experience

  • Palace building

    Non conformity X short service life

    Failure of pipes

    Early replacement

  • PIPES FAILURE OF

    WATERTIGHNESS

    4 MANDATORY replacement = costs, impacts, loss

  • http://www.cidades.gov.br/pbqp-h/

    SiMaC - PBQP-H SiNAT - PBQP-H

    Technical

    Assessments

    Quality Assurance

    Programs

    What are we doing?

    PBQP-H Brazilian

    Quality and Productivity Program for

    Habitat

    INNOVATIVE

    PRODUCTS NO BRAZILIAN

    STANDARDS

    STANDARDIZED

    PRODUCTS AND

    BUILDING

    SYSTEMS

  • 90

    92

    94

    96

    98

    100

    102

    104P

    erf

    orm

    ance

    Time

    minimum acceptable

    average service life

    Nonconformity

  • 0 40 80 120 160 200 240

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    Coeficiente de perda de carga K

    Mar

    ca

    2000

    Loss of pressure of valves

    Comparison of results from 14 products since the beginning of PSQ

    0 40 80 120 160 200 240

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    Coeficiente de perda de carga K

    Mar

    ca

    2014

    standard K

  • Lab Study Objective: To assess toilet bowl performance in different conditions and propose adequate testing methods;

    Field Study Objective: To assess the behavior of low volume bowls under real usage conditions:

    Test qualification main critical properties of performance criteria

  • Dual Flush

    PSQ Toilets - Low Volume Flush Study 2000 and 2014

  • LOCKERS - Simulation of use

    Salt spray test

  • Simulation of use

    Handling simulation

  • PRODUCTS, PERFORMANCE AND MATERIALS

    Site conditions can be differents

    Instalallation conditions are differents

    SAME PRODUCT, diferent performance:

    PRODUCT PERFORMANCE AS A STANDARD COMPLIANCE

    low pressure

    User Confort vazo mnima necessria para o uso

    High pressure

    Probability of loss of water

  • Simulation of use

  • 29% 36%

    87% 88% 94% 89% 89%

    71% 64%

    13% 12% 6% 11% 11%

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Re

    sult

    ado

    s d

    e a

    pro

    va

    o

    Referncia Reprovados AprovadosIncio das avaliaes

    Comparao:

    Sector Evolution

  • 15

  • Estimated period of time for which a system is designed to meet the performance requirements set out by a standard, considering the requirements of the applicable standards, the stage of knowledge at the time of the project, and assuming compliance with the periodicity and correct work of maintenance processes specified in its Manual of use, operation and maintenance.

    The design service life (VUP) must not be confused as the actual service life, durability, certified or legal warranty.

    Note: The VUP is a theoretical estimate of service life. The VU may or may not be realized due to efficiency and maintenance, registration of changes in the work environment, climatic factors etc.

    Cost of maintenance and replacement over the useful life Category

    Design service life (VUP)

    Design service life (VUP) System VUP minimal (years)

    Structure 50*

    Internal floors 13

    External envelope (vertical) 40

    Internal partition walls 20

    Roofing 20

    Water and sanitation system 20

  • 17

    DRYWALL: Conformity of components

    Drywall

    Components

  • 18

    DRYWALL performance of the system FIRE SECURITY - RESISTANCE AND REACTION

  • DRYWALL SECURITY; ACOUSTIC PERFORMANCE

    70mm

    95mm

  • DESIGN SERVICE LIFE - VUP = 8 years approved products according to Brazilian standards. MANUFACTURER ASSUMES VUP, respecting ways of maintenance, installation and operation

  • What are we doing?

    TECHNICAL EVALUATION

    OF INNOVATIVE

    PRODUCTS

    PBQP-H Brazilian Quality and

    Productivity Program for Habitat

  • INNOVATIVE PRODUCT INNOVATIVE BUILDING SYSTEM INNOVATIVE BUILDING SUBSYSTEM

    THERE ISNT A BRAZILIAN STANDARD

    SINAT National System of Technical Assessments

  • SINAT - DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

    PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS NBR 15575 - Edifcios habitacionais

    Establishes minimum performance requirements of systems for residential buildings (structure, roof, floor, walls, etc.);

    Requirements non dependent of materials and building system.

  • System with national coverage;

    Technical assessment of innovative products and systems;

    Reduction of hazards caused by ignorance of the real performance and durability of these products.

    Recycled roof tile - Tetrapak ~ 2 years

    SINAT - DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

  • Conformity assessment in relation to performance standards, Fire Departments, Buildings codes, international standards and other requirements defined for the ITA.

    Procedure for evaluating products or systems TECHNICAL EVALUATION

    The innovative product or system must be subjected to technical evaluation

    SINAT - DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES

  • Telha Reciclada aps ~2 anos

    Customer

    ITA

    Study and draw up Guideline SINAT

    Draw up Technical Evaluation Report

    Conducts Audits of Quality

    Prepare the DATEC

    Appreciation of Guideline SINAT by CT- SINAT

    PUBLISHED of Guideline SINAT

    Conducts periodic control (validity of the Datec)

    Appreciation of DATEC by CT- SINAT

    Concession of the official approvall DATEC by CN-SINAT

    PUBLISHED DATEC

    referendum about the Guideline SINAT by CN- SINAT

    STEPS

  • MINISTRIO DAS CIDADES - Secretaria Nacional da Habitao

    Programa Brasileiro da Qualidade e Produtividade do Habitat (PBQP-H)

    Sistema Nacional de Avaliaes Tcnicas (SINAT)

    Diretrizes para Avaliao Tcnica de Produtos

    DIRETRIZ SINAT

    N 004

    Sistemas construtivos formados por paredes

    estruturais constitudas de painis de PVC

    preenchidos com concreto

    (Sistemas de paredes com formas de PVC incorporada)

    Braslia, julho 2010

    Tabela 1 - Requisitos para caracterizao dos materiais e componentes que formam os sistemas construtivos objetos desta Diretriz

    Item Requisitos Indicador de conformidade

    A Painis de PVC rgido

    A.1 Espessura mnima dos

    perfis 1,7mm

    A.2 Cor dos perfis Conforme especificao de projeto, com () 0,6

    A.3

    Resistncia do PVC aos raios ultravioleta

    (exposio de placas de PVC em cmara de CUV-

    UVB)

    2000 horas de exposio em cmara de CUV, com lmpada de UVB

    A.4 Mdulo de elasticidade na flexo (antes e aps CUV)

    Raps envelhecimento 0,70 Rinicial

    A.5

    Resistncia ao impacto: realizar ensaio de impacto

    Charpy ou ensaio de impacto na trao (antes e aps exposio em cmara

    de CUV)

    Raps envelhecimento 0,70 Rinicial

    A.6 Aspecto visual aps ensaio

    de envelhecimento acelerado

    As duas faces do corpo de prova devem ser avaliadas:

    Sem bolhas, sem fissuras, ou escamaes, aps exposio de 2000 horas em cmara de CUV, com avaliao a 500h, 1000h, 1500h e 2000h

    SINAT GENERATION OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS

  • EXAMPLES OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS

    INNOVATIVE FAADES PVC TILES

    LONG TERM PERFORMANCE

  • Difficulties of durability evaluation

    Changing degradation factors geographically and over time

    Difficulties for the choice of factors and their intensities

    Necessity to reduce the number of tests and testing time

    Validation of the relationship between results and reality

  • Tests qualification main critical properties of long

    term performance;

    Conduction of exploratory tests and technical

    discussions;

    Natural Weathering and comparison of types of

    degradation mechanisms

    Monitoring and tracking performance in real conditions

    Main steps

  • Structural performance, safety during handling and operation

    Assembly and maintenance load

    Weight of the structure and components

  • WATERTIGHNESS; SECURITY

    Requisitos Exigncia

    ESTANQUEIDADE GUA

    No ocorrncia de escorrimento, gotejamento de gua ou gotas aderentes

    Segurana no uso e na operao - POSSIBILIDADE DE CAMINHAMENTO DE PESSOAS SOBRE O TELHADO

    Suportar carga vertical concentrada mnima de 1,2kN nas posies indicadas em projeto sem apresentar ruptura, fissuras, deslizamentos ou outras falhas.

    Regies Condies de ensaio

    Presso esttica Pa

    Vazo de gua L / m2 / min

    I 10

    4 II 20 III 30 IV 40 V 50

    Carga de

    1,2kN

    Ensaio em

    laboratrio

    Solicitao real

  • Requisitos Exigncia

    DESEMPENHO ESTRUTURAL

    Resistncia ao do vento

    Clculo das cargas de vento - NBR 6123:1988 - Foras devidas ao vento em edificaes

    No ocorrncia de remoo ou danos no telhado sujeitos a esforos de suco. Deformao mxima admissvel residual L/250 Deformao mxima admissvel instantnea 2 x L/250

    Ao de granizo e outras cargas acidentais em telhados

    No ocorrncias de ruptura ou traspassamento 1J

    Regio

    do Brasil

    Presso de ensaio (Pa)

    Altura do solo: 5m Altura do solo: 15m

    I 500 850

    II 750 1100

    III 950 1500

    IV 1200 1900

    V 1500 2300

    Esfera: 65g

    Dimetro 25mm

    Aplicar um impacto na posio mais desfavorvel por meio de esfera de ao abandonada em queda livre (1,5m).

    Energia de impacto: 1J

    WIND PRESSURE; SECURITY

  • Action of heat and thermal shock

    10 cycles of heat and cooling with water spray

  • PVC TILES

  • Proposed text: revision of the standard NBR 15575: The outer surface of the covering system should provide flame propagation coefficient 75. For kitchen environment, flame propagation coefficient should be 25.

    For joints forming materials, when installed, the assessment of outer surface could be:

    European method of roof for outer

    surface in real conditions 15:

    ENV 1187 - Test methods for

    external fire exposure to roofs

    FIRE PROTECTION

  • PVC TILES FIELD EXPERIENCE

  • Teresina

    Palmas

    Piracicaba

    Macei

    Piracicaba Weather Station - ESALQ/USP Teresina

    Palmas

    Macei Building at seaside (strong wind action)

    SELECTED LOCATIONS

    EXPOSITION OF PROTOTYPES ROOFS

  • PALMAS: replacement of metal

    tiles for PVC tiles

    ESALQ structures manufacture

    PVC TILES

  • Natural Weathering stations Rio Grande

  • 20/4/2005 Vera Fernandes-Hachich and Vahan

    Agopyan 41

    Unplasticized PVC window frames accelerated weathering of PVC specimens X natural

    weathering Rate of strength decrease

    MBC10 - Reduo relativa de

    resistncia

    Exposio acelerada

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    0 1000 2000 3000

    Tempo (h)

    RI(

    t)/R

    I(0)

    MBC10 - Reduo relativa de

    resistncia

    Exposio natural

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    Tempo (anos)

    RI(

    t)/R

    I(0)

    y = -0,0002x + 0,9827

    R2 = 0,8653

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    0 1000 2000 3000

    y = -0,1385x + 0,9217

    R2 = 0,8956

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    0 1 2 3 4 5

    DR/Ro = 13,85% / year DR/Ro = 20% / 1000 h

    In the examples above:

  • Maximum fee of impact resistance decrease: criteria

    Reducing the

    consumer risk, i.e, the

    risk of accept an

    inapropriated

    formulation (consumer

    risk = 1,9%), without

    excessively increasing

    the risk of the producer

    (2,2%), ie, a good

    formulation be

    rejected, one arrives at

    a rate of strenght

    decrease of

    7% per year 0,0%

    5,0%

    10,0%

    15,0%

    20,0%

    25,0%

    30,0%

    4% 6% 8% 10% 12%

    Valor limite da taxa de

    decrscimo de resistncia

    Prob

    abili

    dade Prob. de rejeitar

    compostoadequado

    Prob. de aceitarcompostoinadequado

    0

    0,5

    1

    1,5

    2

    2,5

    3

    2% 6% 10% 14% Mais

    Distribuio de taxas de decrscimo de

    resistncia - Exposio natural

  • Accelerated weathering 1000 hours are enough?

    2000 h

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    0 1000 2000 3000

    RI

    (t

    )/R

    I(

    0)

    Time (hs)

    MBC10 - Relative strenght

    decrease

    - accelerated weathering

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    0 1000 2000 3000

    RI(t)/R

    I(0

    )

    Time (hs)

    MBC10 - Relative strenght

    decrease - accelerated

    weathering

    1000 h

  • 1000 h 2000 h 2000 h r2=0,78

    SATISFACTORY

    1000 hours vs. 2000 hours

    R = 0,3125

    0%5%

    10%15%20%25%30%35%

    0% 5% 10% 15%

    AC

    CE

    LE

    RA

    TE

    D(1

    000X

    %h)

    Natural (%/year)

    Rate of strenght decrease DRI/RI(0),

    of different formulations

    (acceletated test until 1000 h)

    MBC10 ABC10

    CPP10 CPC10 ACC10

    ACB10 Linear ()

    R = 0,7803

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    0% 5% 10% 15%

    AC

    CELER

    ATED

    (100

    0 x

    %/h

    )

    Natural (%/year)

    Rate of strenght resistance, DRI/RI(0), of different formulations

    (acceletated test until 2000 h)

    MBC10 ABC10

    CPP10 CPC10 ACC10

    ACB10 Linear ()

    1000 h r2=0,31

    INSATISFACTORY

    ACCEPTABLE?

  • Rate of strenght decrease

    DRI/RI(0), of several formulations

    (accelerated weathering test until 2000 h)

    R 2 = 0,7803

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    0% 5% 10% 15%

    Natural (%/year)

    Acc

    ele

    rate

    d (

    1000 x

    %/h

    )

    MBC10

    ABC10

    CPP10

    CPC10

    ACC10

    ACB10

    Linear

    Criteria DR/Ro < 0,015% / h on QUV

    Accelerated:

    15% / 1000 h

    0,015% / h

    Measures at 0, 500, 1000 e 2000 h

    Natural: 7% per year

  • 46

    Degradation of PE reservoirs exposed to the weather

    - accelerated exposure = 18000h WOM.

    - natural exposure = 10 years

    Technical experiments

  • 47

    Technical experiments

    Reservoirs's deformation

    Laboratory tests:

    - Short duration test (72h);

    - Test chamber: 50C;

    - Detect the possible deformations and loss of watertight;

    - Distinguish products that present different deformations behavior.

    Field Study:

    - Exposure of reservoirs by 130 days to weather (in SP);

    -Determination of reservoirss deformation

  • Lifetime of Plastic Pipes

    environment

    load

    material

    Lifetime = f

  • Environmental Factor Chlorine

  • Testing Techniques

    Hydrostatic Pressure Testing

    Notch Pipe Testing (SCG-test)

    Rapid Crack Propagation Testing (Up to 250 mm)

    Circulation Loop Testing Water

    Circulation Loop Testing Chlorinated water

    N 2 PIP

    E

    Bath

    or

    oven

    at

    0-

    160C Float valve

    Float

    Time registration

    P

    N 2

    H 2 O

  • Evaluating the Results

  • Development of PE Pipe Materials

    Discovery of low pressure polymerization by Dr. Karl Ziegler

    Mid 1950s, First generation PE 50 and PE 63

    1980s, Second generation Unimodal PE 80

    [MPa]

    [h]

    1st Generation

    20C

    60C

    80C

    [MPa]

    [h]

    2nd Generation

    20C

    60C

    80C

  • STRESS REGRESSION LINE (PE) Transition of failure mechanism

  • STRESS REGRESSION LINE (PE)

  • STRESS REGRESSION LINE PVC PIPES

    EUA (HDB) = 100.000 h = 11,4 anos Europa (MRS) = 50 anos = 438.000 h

    HDB = Hydrostatic Design Basis MRS = Minimum Required Strenght

  • STRESS REGRESSION LINE(PP)

  • LAB FAILURES AND NOT

    PR

    ES

    SU

    RE

    FAILURE TIME

  • .NOT FIELD FAILURES!

  • THANK YOU,

    FOR YOUR ATTENTION!