service business development in manufacturing companies
DESCRIPTION
This presentation is a very comprehensive view on different aspects of service business development in manufacturing companies. It discusses necessary investments into the service business, cognitive limitations for these investments, service strategies, organizational structures, and service business in China.TRANSCRIPT
Service Business Development in Manufacturing Companies
Heiko Gebauer
Department Innovation Research in Utility Sectors - Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
University of St.Gallen (Switzerland)
Karlstad University (Sweden)
Cranfield University
Agenda
1. Attention-based and cognitive perspective on the service business development
2. Environment-strategy & strategy-structure configurations
3. Capability perspective on service business development
4. Service business development in China
Cranfield UniversityMeaning of services in manufacturing companies
Theoretical perspectives Practical illustration
-Transition from product manufacturers to services providers
-Moving downstream towards services
-Servitisation in the manufacturing sector
-Service business development
-Capital equipment manufactures moving towards high-value solutions
-Product-service-systems
- Logistic support and technical advice
- Construction and design of components
- Design of small volume cars
- Outsourcing services for manufacturing small volume cars
Selected sources: Wise and Baumgartner, 1998; Davies (2004), Vandermerwe and Rada, 1988, Oliva and Kallenberg (2003), Mathyssens and Vandendempt (1998 and 2008), Neely (2008), Brown, Gustafsson, Witell, 2009
Cranfield UniversityWhy should companies move into the service business?
Sources: Mathieu, 2001, IBM Annual reports, Simon, 1993
"The [service] market is bigger than we ever
dreamt“, Jack Welch the former CEO of General
Electric
Siemens announced the goal to create 50% of the
total revenue through services
IBM extended the service business (1993, 35.7% to. 60.2% of revenue
attributed to services in 2003).
Anecdotal evidences
Service opportunities
Marketing Financial Strategic
- Augmenting the product offering
- More intense customer relationship
- Additional revenue- Higher profitability than
products- More resistant to
economic cycles
- Adressing more comprehensive customer needs
- Co-created competences as resource barrier
Cranfield University
ThyssenKrupp sells its industrial service business because it could not create synergies with its other business units.
Comau increased the share of service revenue from 14 to 19% (2005-2008), but the corporate revenue declined about 29%
Dürr provided outsourcing services, but the corresponding challenges led to the decision to sell the service unit.
In business practice, companies face the “service paradox”
Anecdotal challenges Industry challenges
- Service offerings are mainly restricted to basic services for the installed product base
- Investments in the service business do not create the corresponding returns leading to the “service paradox”
- Service are often given “free” during the negotiation of the product
- Service approach lack sufficient professionalization and systematization
- Despite expectations of about 50% revenues created through service, most companies still achieve less than 20%
Sources: Belz et al. 1997, Gebauer et al. 2005, Neu and Brown 2005
Cranfield University
Understanding the complexity of service business development
Service business is more complex than the product business
Sources: Cohen et al. 2006
Parameter Product business Service business
Nature of demand More predictable, can better forecast
Always unpredictable, sporadic
Required response Standard, can be scheduled
as soon as possible
Number of product generations
Limited 10 to 15 times higher
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) An investigation of the relationship between behavioral processes, motivation, investments in the service business and service revenue (together with Elgar Fleisch)
b) An attention-based view on service orientation in the business strategy of manufacturing companies
Cranfield UniversityFrom behavioral processes to overall profitability (1)
Behavioral processes
Level of managerial motivation
Investments in the service business
Share of service revenue
Overall profitability
H1 H2 H3 H4
Cranfield UniversityFrom behavioral processes to overall profitability (2)
Behavioral processes
Level of managerial motivation
Investments in the service business
Share of service revenue
Overall profitability
H1 H2 H3 H4
38.7%
26.6%
19.1%
4.5%
11.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
0-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% over 40%Share of service revenue to total revenue
Fraction of companies sampled (n=199)
Cranfield UniversityFrom behavioral processes to overall profitability (3)
Behavioral processes
Level of managerial motivation
Investments in the service business
Share of service revenue
Overall profitability
H1 H2 H3 H4
27.7%
33.9%
21.7%
12.2%
4.5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
0-5% 5-10% 10-15% 15-20% over 20%Share of investment in the service business on total investments
Fraction of companies sampled (n=199)
Cranfield UniversityFrom behavioral processes to overall profitability (4)
Our managers have not regnized the financial opportunities of an extended service businessOur managers are highly risk averse on exploiting the strategic oppportunities of servicesOur managers tend to set overambitious goals for extending the service businessOur managers have shown to overemphasis obvious causalities
Factor 1: Behavioral proceses
Cronbach AlphaFactor loadingFactor (construct) and item description¹item
1234
Our managers put a high valence on extending the service businessOur managers expect that their effort in extending the service business will succeed in more service revenue
Factor 2: Managerial motivation
56
What is the share of investmenst in service to total investments?Our managers invest substantially resources in extending the service business
78
What is the share of service revenue on total revenue?The services that we offer contribute substantially towards overall enterprise revenue
Factor 4: Share of service revenue
910
Average return on sales of the business unit over the last three years.Average return on sales in comparison to industry average.
Factor 5: Overall profitability
1112
¹ All items were measured on a 5-point scale (1 = lowest score, 5 = highest score). Exept for item 7, 9, 11 and 12 asked on a Likert-type scale (with the anchors 1 = totally disagree and 5 = totally agree). Item 7 was measured on a Likert-type scale with 1 = 0-5%, 2 = 5-10%. 3 = 10-15%, 4 =15-20% and 5=more than 20%. Item 9 was measured on a Likert-type scale with 1 = 0-10%, 2 = 10-20%. 3 = 20-30%, 4 = 30-40 and 5=more than 40%. Item 11 was measured on a Likert-type scale with 1 = negative, 2 = 0-2.5%. 3 = 2.5-5%, 4 = 5-7.5 and 5=more than 7.5%. Item 12 was measured on a Likert-type scale with 1 = very much below the industry average and 5 = very much above industry average.
0.780.820.670.86
0.87
0.840.83
0.81
0.920.97
0.95
0.900.82
0.87
0.740.72
0.78
Factor 3: Investments in the service business
Cranfield UniversityFrom behavioral processes to overall profitability (5)
Behavioral processes
Level of managerial motivation
Investments in the service business
Share of service revenue
Overall profitability
H2: β =.352, p ≤ .01 H3: β =.479, p ≤ .05 H4: β =.493, p ≤.01H1: β =.-501, p ≤ .011 2 3 4
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) An investigation of the relationship between behavioral processes, motivation, investments in the service business and service revenue (together with Elgar Fleisch)
b) An attention-based view on service orientation in the business strategy of manufacturing companies
Cranfield UniversityAttention-based theory of the firm
Model of attention and firm behavior Key triggers
• Focus of attention
• Situated attention
• Structural distribution of attention
Source: Ocasio, 1997
Cranfield UniversityResearch model
Source: Gebauer (2009)
Strategy-formulation perspective
Service orientationof the business
strategy
Competitive intensity
Customer expectations
Overall profitability
H1 (+)
H2 (+)
H3 (+)
Focus of attention
H4 (+) and H5 (+)
Situated attention
H6 (+)
Strategy-implementation perspective
H - Hypothesis
Cranfield UniversityResearch model
Source: Gebauer (2009)
Strategy-formulation perspective
Service orientationof the business
strategy
Competitive intensity
Customer expectations
Overall profitability
H1 (+)
H2 (+)
H3 (+)
Focus of attention
H4 (+) and H5 (+)
Situated attention
H6 (+)
Strategy-implementation perspective
H - Hypothesis
Hypothesis can not be rejected
Cranfield University
Agenda
1. Attention-based and cognitive perspective on the service business development
2. Environment-strategy & strategy-structure configurations
3. Capability perspective on service business development
4. Service business development in China
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) Identifying service strategies in product manufacturing companies by exploring environment–strategy configurations
b) Match or mismatch: strategy-structure configuration in the service business in the service business of manufacturing companies (together with Anders Gustafsson, Bo Edvardsson, and Lars Witell)
Cranfield UniversityResearch framework (1)Configuration of external environment and strategy
External environment •Competitive intensity in the product field
•Competitive intensity in the service field
•Market growth•Customer’s price sensitivity
•Customer’s strategic options for operating the product
Strategy•Cost leadership•Product differentiation•Service differentiation•Service marketing differentiation
•Service offering
Cranfield UniversityResultsThe eight cluster emerging from the external environment constructs and strategy constructs match to four configurations• After-sales service providers• Customer support service providers• Outsourcing partners• Development partners
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) Identifying service strategies in product manufacturing companies by exploring environment–strategy configurations
b) Match or mismatch: strategy-structure configuration in the service business in the service business of manufacturing companies (together with Anders Gustafsson, Bo Edvardsson, and Lars Witell)
Cranfield UniversityResearch framework (2)Configuration of service strategy and organizational design elements
Service Strategies
•Basic services for the installed base (after-sales services)
•Advanced services for avoiding failures on the installed base
•Design & construction services•Operational services (outsourcing services
Organizational design elements
Corporate culturea) Abstract value of services,b) Role understanding,
Human resourcesc) Personnel recruitingd) Personnel traininge) Personnel compensation
Organizational structuref) Distinction product and service
organizationg) Proximity to customers
Cranfield UniversityResultsFour matching configurations were identified
Cranfield University
Service orientation in organizational design elements¹A – abstract value of services, B – role understanding, C – personnel recruiting, D – training, E – compensation, F – distinction product and service organization, G –proximity to customers
A
B
C
DE
F
G
0
0.5
1
Organizational design elements for implementing the service strategies
After-sales service providers
Customer support service providers
Development partners
Outsourcing partners
A
B
C
DE
F
G
0
0.5
1A
B
C
DE
F
G
0
0.5
1
A
B
C
DE
F
G
0
0.5
1
Legend (0 – low, 1 – high – cluster means)¹
Source: Gebauer, Gustafsson, Edvardsson and Witell (forthcoming 2010), Neu and Brown (2005 and 2008)
Cranfield UniversityImplement the strategy by adaptating typical factors on organizational design
Corporate culture
Values of providing services
Role of employees
Human resource management
Personnel recruitment
Personnel training
Organizational structure
Integration of business unit responsibility
Intra-& interfirm collaboration
Global service infrastructure
After-sales service provider
Customer support service provider
Outsourcing Partner
Development partner
Service Strategy
Cranfield UniversityDefining different service packages for customers
TRUMPF ServicePlus NaSa The extended night / saturday telephone hotline for support outside normal office hours.
TRUMPF ServicePlus Tele The online-connection for efficient services and higher availability of machinery.
TRUMPF ServicePlus Classic All preventive maintenance for one flat-rate.
TRUMPF ServicePlus Special All preventive maintenance and remedy of all ocurring breakdowns for one flat-rate.
TRUMPF ServicePlus Premium All-in-one – the extensive service for a TRUMPF machine.
TRUMPF ServicePlus Extra The special services for more convenience.
Cranfield UniversityTriggers for improving the service excellenceEstablish a separate service organization
SIG Pack
BU Systems BU Stand. Mach.
SIG Pack ...
Service
Service
SIG Pack ...
SIG Pack ...
BU Service
Business CC
Logistics
Profit & Loss ResponsibilityOperative Leadership of Service-HubsDefinition of standardisedProcesses / IT InfrastructureProduct-ManagementResonsibility of localservice business– Service-Sales– Spare parts Management– Fieldservice– Modernization– Hand over management
IT / Prozesse
Prod. Manag.
Sales andService-Hubs
SIG Pack ...
Service
Service
SIG Pack ...
BU Systems BU Stand. Mach.
Quelle: R. Hänggi, 2003
Cranfield UniversityInvesting in an international service infrastructure
Third Level Support•Document services and database information support•Extended training support•Extended trouble shooting with qualified engineers•Technology and process support•Project support•Spare part stock for most used parts•Repair and Manufacturing of spare parts•Sales support
HQ
First Level Support (service base)•Local contact / language•Basic helps on phone•Local engineer support•Spare part order handling
Second Level Support (subsidiary)•Hotline support•Preventive service programs•Basic training programs•Trouble shooting on side•Replacement parts on stock for urgent help•Spare part order handling•Commissioning and start up handling
Cranfield UniversityABB and NOKIA
Cranfield UniversitySucceeding through the service strategies opens-up the potential of providing solutions
After-sales service provider
Customer support service provider
Development partner
Outsourcing partner
Source: Gebauer, Fischer and Fleisch (2010)
Solution provider•Key capabilities: •Balancing different business models
•Integration of different business models
•Flexibility across different business models
•Customer proximity to understanding requirements according to the business model
Cranfield University
Agenda
1. Attention-based and cognitive perspective on the service business development
2. Environment-strategy & strategy-structure configurations
3. Capability perspective on service business development
4. Service business development in China
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) Exploitation or exploration in service business development?: Insights from a dynamic capabilities perspective (together with Thomas Fischer Thomas, Ren Guanjin and Mike Gregory)
b) Capability perspective on service business development in small and medium suppliers (together with Marco Paiola and Bo Edvardsson)
Cranfield University
Two different approaches for the service business development
Characteristics Exploitation Exploration
Type of organizational change
Incremental improvements of the existing strategic stage
Radical, jump towards new strategic stage
Primary addressed service opportunity (customer activity chain)
Temporal expansion within the primary customer activity chain
Spatial reconfiguration within the adjacent customer activity chain
Value constellations Value-adding to existing value constellations
Defining new value constellations
Service-oriented performance improvements
10% to 27% of share of service revenue within a period of 10 to 12 years.
From less than 20% to more than 40% share of service revenue within about 5 years
Cranfield UniversityExploitation or exploration: How to approach the service opportunities?
Adapted from Sawhney, 2004, Fischer, Gebauer, Guanjie, Gregory and Fleisch. (forthcoming 2010)
Reconfiguration
Extension
How do service opportunities
appear?)
Primary customer activities
Where do service opportunities appear?
Supplementary customer activities
SalesPre-Sales After-sales
Exploration
• Radical improvement
• New value constellation
• Dynamiccapabilities
Exploitation
• Incremental improvements
• Value-adding to existing value constellation
• Development of operational capabilities
Cranfield UniversityExploitation and the corresponding service strategies
After-sales service provider
Customer support service provider
Development partner
Outsourcing partner
Source: Gebauer, Fischer and Fleisch (forthcoming 2010)
Cranfield UniversityExploration and forming a new value constellation
After-sales service provider or customer support
service provider
New value constellation capturing nearly all customer
activities
Hilti has formed a new value constellation through its fleet management
Dynamic capabilities- Sensing opportunities beyond existing
industry barriers- Seizing the business model- Reconfiguring companies assets and
structure
Cranfield UniversityService business development
Phase 3:Making use of the service expansion along the adjacent customer activity chain
Phase 2:Creating a new value constellation
Phase 1:Integrating basic services into the product price
Exploration
Exploitation
Phase 3:Making use of the service expansion along the primary customer activity chain
Phase 2:Separating product and service business to extend service profit and revenue
Phase 1Integrating basic services into theproduct price
Cranfield UniversityService business development
Phase 2:Creating a new value constellation
Exploration and dynamic capabilities
Sensing • Create markets, new customer value opportunities, and shape market behavior
• Past competitive behavior function as hurdles for re-shaping the market structure.
• Opened-up beyond traditional value chain logic and industry borders
Seizing • Strategic vision of new value opportunities
• Sophisticated approach to decision-making under high uncertainty
• ‘Umbrella strategies' for the new value constellations
• Risk management routines
Reconfiguring • Reconfigure internal organizational design factors
• Reconfigure business relationships with external
• Integrate or reintegrate service and product
• Customers buy and value is not a product or service but utility
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) Exploitation or exploration in service business development?: Insights from a dynamic capabilities perspective (together with Thomas Fischer Thomas, Ren Guanjin and Mike Gregory)
b) Capability perspective on service business development in small and medium suppliers (together with Marco Paiola and Bo Edvardsson)
Cranfield UniversityExisting research concentrates on OEMs
Endcustomer
OEM(Original
equipment manufacturer)
1st tiersupplier
2nd tiersupplier
3rd tier supplier
Focus of existing research• OEMs moving into the aftermarket• OEMs possessing strong resource
positions
• Very few evidences how small and medium suppliers can exploit the potential of service business development
Sources: Matthyssens and Vandendempt, 2008; Fang, Palmatier, and Steenkamp, 2008; Oliva and Kallenberg, 2003; Davies, 2004; Neu and Brown, 2005; Raddats and Easingwood, 2010; Windahl and Lakemond, 2010.
Sources: Matthyssens, Vandenbempt and Weynst, 2009; Gebauer, Paiola, Edvardsson, 2010
Cranfield UniversityFollowing factors motivate research on SMSs (small and medium suppliers)Small and medium suppliers Research motivation
• Scope of product and service components necessary to provide solutions might correspond with the competence-base of MNEs, but is most probably beyond the organizational boundaries of SMSs
• SMSs might not reach the critical mass, which is needed by the service business to become profitable
• OEMs are in superior market position to offer services throughout a long life cycle
Sources: Wise and Baumgartner, 1999; Davies, 2004; Oliva and Kallenberg, 2003; Gebauer , Fleisch and Friedli, 2005; Auguste, Harmon and Pandit, 2006; Gebauer, Paiola, Edvardsson, 2010.
Source: Picture is free-licensed by Gettyimages
Cranfield UniversityDeepening the theoretical concept onservice business development is necessary
Success factors Organizational capabilities
Source: Picture is free-licensed by Gettyimages
• Organizational structures, human resources, corporate culture, measurement & rewards, service business development
• Organizational capabilities, in general, originate from the resource-based view
• Organizational capabilities are twofold, including operational and dynamic capabilities
• Operational capabilities enable a company to earn a living in a relatively stable business environment
• Dynamic capabilities encapsulate the evolutionary nature of resources and capabilities (sense, seize, reconfigure)
Sources: Penrose, 1959; Barney, 1991; Zollo and Winter, 2002; Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000; Teece et al., 1997; Zahra and George, 2002; Winter, 2003.
Sources: Wise and Baumgartner, 1999; Davies, 2004; Oliva and Kallenberg, 2003; Gebauer , Fleisch and Friedli, 2005; Auguste, Harmon and Pandit, 2006; Gebauer, Paiola, Edvardsson, 2010.
Cranfield UniversityFocus is on qualitative research
Research question Research methodology
How organizational capabilities of small and
medium suppliers co-evolve with the service business development?
•Interpretative multiple-case study approach relying on a range of supplier industries in four European countries (Germany, Italy, Sweden and Switzerland)
•Setting was chosen on conceptual grounds rather than for its representativeness
•Qualitative data was obtained between 2001 and 2009 through longitudinal action research with three of the nine participating SMSs and interviews with the remaining six SMSs
•Analysis includes within-case analysis and cross-case analysis
•As the capabilities emerged inductively from the field work, we turned to the previous research conceptually substantiated the capabilities and their interrelation with service business development.
Cranfield UniversityDynamic and operational capabilities are conceptualized in the following way
Dynamic capabilities Operational capabilities
Organizational routines
Individual cognition and skills
External Internal
Sensing
Seizing
Reconfiguring
Based on: Teece 2007; Stefano, Peteraf, Verona, 2010.
Individuals’ specialized competencies
Cross-functional
Broad-functional
Activity-related
Specialized
Single-Task
Based on: Grant, 1996.
Cranfield UniversityOur results indicate three differenttrajectories of service business development (1)
Trajectories for the service business development
Key characteristics
Alpha: Enhancing relational value to the existing supplier-buyer
relationships
Beta: Financial value-seeking behavior in existing and new supplier-buyer relationships
Gamma: Radical leap towards a new value
constellation downstream in the value chain
Number of SMSs 6 2 1
Strategic intension
• Exploiting service opportunities in supplier-buyer relationship
• Exploiting service opportunities for additional service revenues and profits
• Exploring untested service market
Business logic • Changing incrementally from transaction- to relationship-oriented business logic
• Changing incrementally from transaction-orientation for products to transaction-orientation for products and service
• New customers in adjacent value-added steps
• Forming radically a new value network
Competitive advantages
• Co-produced relational-competencies
• Co-produced service-competencies
• Competencies co-produced within the value network
Financial indicators
• Services create 10% price premium for products
• Services create about 15% of the total revenue
• Service achieves margin leverage of two compared to product revenue
• Services create additional revenues and create about 25% of revenue
• Service revenue achieves margin leverage of three compared to product revenue
Cranfield UniversityDynamic capabilities for the trajectories
Alpha Beta Gamma
Sensing • Timely and reactively• Incremental
improvements• Marketing opportunities in
customer relationships
• Breaking with the preoccupations
• More counter-cycle• Financial opportunities
• Opening-up to strategic opportunities• Market structure endogenous• Substituting theory-in-use• Emphasizing new value propositions• Driving the structure of the market
and shaping the market behaviorSeizing • Balancing costs for
services and quality of supplier-buyer relationship
• Defining the value associated with the new services
• Value-based prices for each service
• Verifying willingness to demand and pay for the services
• Value propositions as utility, which product and service does for the customers
• ‚Umbrella strategies' with various scenarios
• Anticipating how each scenario would affect value creation logics
• Mobilizing other network player• Visioning a value network, which
forms new value constellationsRecon-figuring
• Corporate culture, human resources and measurement systems
• Corporate culture, human resources, organizational structures, and innovation process
• Corporate culture, human resources, organizational structures, and innovation process inside the single supplier
• Orchestrating reconfiguration activities of other network actors
Cranfield UniversityOperational capabilities for the trajectories
Alpha Beta Gamma
Corporate culture
• Behavioral roles of trusted adviser and “whatever-it-takes” philosophy
• Services as potential source of revenue and profits
• Behavior roles of a reliable service providers and "whatever-is-paid and valued" philosophy
• Openess to re-structure the value chain and value constellations
• Roles on breaking and critically reconsidering industry recipe
• Roles on providing reliable solutions
Human resources
• Learn more quickly the nature of customer's service expectations
• Rewarding “whatever-it-takes philosophy
• Convince customer's to pay for services
• Rewarding outstanding financial performance (rewarding the "whatever-is-paid and valued" philosophy)
• Partnering competencies to create collaborative learning relationships
• Developing behavioral competencies to learn quickly to provide integrated solutions through a network of business partners
• Rewarding cooperation's with business partners and solving customer problems in collaboration with business partners
Organ-izational structure
• Service teams with profit-and-loss responsibilities
• Solution teams with profit-and-loss responsibilities
• inter-company collaboration with business partners
Measurement systems
• Erratic re-calculation of customer profitability
• Set of financial and non-financial indicators for the service teams
• Set of financial and non-financial indicators for the solution teams
Innovation process
• Milestones and assessments of the financial benefits
• Opening-up the innovation process to business partners
• Integrating product and service innovation into solution innovation processes
Cranfield UniversityOur study offers following insights
Managerial implications
Limitations
Described guidelines are managerial guidance for implementing one of the three trajectories
Future research should obtain additional qualitative data to replicate our findings
Analysis of dynamic and operational capabilities is limited when it comes to understand the potential path dependence leading
Theoretical implications
By concentrating on SMSs, we could also depart from the previous focus on considering the service business development as a single firm effort.
Trajectory Alpha and Beta entail network insights by describing the reconfiguration of capabilities between SMSs and their distributors.
Gamma shows how cooperating with new business partners forms a new network.
The dominating trajectory Alpha results from a familiarity, propinquity and maturity traps.
High path dependence for each trajectory
Source: Matthyssen and Vandendempt (2008)
Cranfield University
Agenda
1. Attention-based and cognitive perspective on the service business development
2. Environment-strategy & strategy-structure configurations
3. Capability perspective on service business development
4. Service business development in China
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) Global approach to the service business in manufacturing companies
b) Business-to-business marketing as a key factor for increasing service revenue in China (together with Chunzhi Wang, Bernold Beckenbauer, Regine Krempl) and Spare parts logistics in China (together with Gunther Kuzca and Chunzhi Wang)
Cranfield University
Global challenges in internationalizing the service business
Establishing a globalservice infrastructure
Service business development in China
Cranfield University
Establishing a global service infrastructure
Global levelOrganizational distinctiveness between product
and service business
Market levelResponsiveness local
requirement
Integration Separation
Low (1) Integrated and ethnocentric global service approach (4) Separated and
geocentric global service structure
Medium
High ( 2) Integrated and polycentric global service structure
(3) Separated and polycentric global service structure
Cranfield University
(1) Integrated and ethnocentric global service approach
M1
M2
M3
C
C
Service organization is integrated as a cost center in the business unit for products
Market organizations (M)
Central
Customers (C)
De-central
Description
Service offering:• Basic services for the installed base• Advanced technical support• Part delivery from central warehouse
Configuration
• Service organization is integrated as a cost center in the business unit for products
• Central product organization controls marketing, sales, services, manufacturing, R&D, accounting/finance, and human resources
• Market organizations (sales agent or subsidiaries) sell products and provide customer service to augment the product during the sales phase of the product
• The central service organization provides basic services for the installed base and advanced technical support
• Services are included in the product price
• Market organization has low decision-making authority
• The central organization communicates intensively with the local organization
Product organization
Service organization
……
Service offering:• Customer
serviceC
Cranfield University
(2) Integrated and polycentric global service structure
M1
M2
M3
C
C
Service organization is integrated as a cost center in the business unit for products
Market organizations (M)
Central
Customers (C)
De-central
Service offering:First-level and second- level support• Customer service• Basic services for
the installed base• Maintenance
servicesParts delivery from local warehouse
Service offering:• Third level support
Product organization
Service organization
DescriptionConfiguration
• Service organization is integrated as a cost center in the business unit for products
• The market organizations are a relatively independent units and control product sales, provision of customer service, basic services for the installed base, few maintenance services, and human resources.
• Market organizations set-up local warehouses for spare parts delivery.
• The third level support remains in the central organization
• Key positions are obtained by local sales and service employees
• Central service organization has relatively low authority and decision making competencies
• Volume of communication and information from the central to the market organization and among different market organizations is low
• Services are included in the product price
……
C
Cranfield University
(3) Separated and polycentric global service structure
M1
BUProduct
M2
M3
C
C
Separate business unit (BU) for services with own profit-and-loss
responsibility
Market organizations (M)
Central
Customers (C)
De-central
BU Services
Service offering:First-level and second- level support• Customer service• Basic services for
the installed base• Maintenance
servicesParts delivery from local warehouse
M1
Service offering:• Third level support
DescriptionConfiguration
• Service organization is an independent business unit with its own profit-and-loss responsibility
• The business unit for services controls the service development, spare parts logisticss, and service support functions.
• In each country remains a single market organizations that is still responsible for the product and service business, but the cost and revenue structure clearly distinguish between product and service business.
• Market organization provides first- and second level support (customer service, basic services, maintenance services, whereas the separated central service organization takes over the responsibility to provide third level support.
• Services are charged separately facilitating service profitability.
• Relatively low decision-making authority remains in the central service organization.
• Little communication between central business unit for services and local service centers and among the local service centers of different market organization.
……
C
Cranfield University(4) Separated and geocentric global service structure
BUProduct
C
M2
M3
C
C
Market organizations (M)¹
Central
Customers (C)
De-central
BU Services
Service offering:First-level support¹• Customer service• Basic services for
the installed base• Preventive services
and service contracts
M1
Service-Hub
Service offering:• Third level
supportService offering:• Second-level
support• Parts delivery from
regional warehouse
DescriptionConfiguration
• Collaborative approach between both central business units (products and services) and the market organizations. To enhance the collaborative approach, the manufacturing companies reported to install regional functions.
• Regional warehouses are established• Service hubs provide second-level support• Market organizations concentrate on selling preventive
services and service contracts.• The service hubs facilitate the information flows between
the central and local organization and promotes the exchange of experiences among the different market organizations.
• Service hubs decide about the degree of standardization of the service offer and balance between the transferability of services across market organizations versus customization for individual customers.
• Companies recruit and develop the best employees everywhere in the world for key positions across the global service network.
• The managing directors of the different market organizations and the head of the business unit services are typically part of the management team of the hub.
¹According to market size and maturity, large market organizations can offer both 1st and 2nd level service offerings.
Regional
Large markets
M1
Other markets
Separate business unit (BU) for services with own profit-and-loss
responsibility
Cranfield UniversityContributions
a) Global approach to the service business in manufacturing companies
b) Business-to-business marketing as a key factor for increasing service revenue in China (together with Chunzhi Wang, Bernold Beckenbauer, Regine Krempl) and Spare parts logistics in China (together with Gunther Kuzca and Chunzhi Wang)
Cranfield UniversityManufacturing companies achieve lower shares of service revenue in total revenue in China
0
5
10
15
20
25
European service organizations of Swiss
equipment manufacturing
companies
Chinese service organizations of Swiss
equipment manufacturing
companies
21.2
10.3
Service revenue as a percentage of total revenue, operating margin [in percent]
8.2
5.1
Percentage of service revenue on total revenue
Operating margin
Cranfield UniversityEffects of Chinese cultural characteristics on service management (1/2)
Service strategies
Cultural characteristics
Effects on service management
After-sales service provider
Long-term orientation
Establishing a binding relationship corresponds with supporting customer's purchase decision by offering customer service for "free".
Guanxi, renqing and mianzi
Service managers deliberately use "free" customer services for establishing a guanxi network and "giving face" to their customers.
Customer support service provider
Long-term orientation
Chinese service managers also use the "free-of-charge" approach for related services.
Guanxi, renqing and mianzi
Service managers deliberately use "free" product-related services for establishing a guanxi network and "giving face" to their customers.
Power distance The high power distance in China limits the empowerment of service managers and service technicians to offer product-related services proactively.
Guanxi, renqing and mianzi
Service managers and service technicians are highly reluctant to change their mindsets.
Cranfield UniversityEffects of Chinese cultural characteristics on service management (2/2)
Service strategies
Cultural characteristics
Effects on service management
Uncertainty avoidance
The preference for personal relationships limits the implementation of contractual arrangements for pricing equipment availability
Power distance Establishing a long-term relationship by using a "free-of-charge" approach for product-related services reduces the risk perceived by customers when they consider the purchase of equipment availability
Customer support service provider
Guanxi, renqing and mianzi
Service managers support customers to improve all processes associated with a company’s product. In this case, they “give face” to their customers by praising customers' reputations
Guanxi, renqing and mianzi
Service managers deliberately use "free" product-related services for establishing a guanxi network and "giving face" to their customers.
Guanxi, renqing and mianzi
The guanxi network supports a reputation and personal relationships with its customers.
Family as the base economic actor
The fact that the base economic actor is the family rather than the firm leads to a high fluctuation among service staff.
Cranfield UniversityIncreasing spare parts logistic performance (1)
(1) Direct export of spare parts from Europe to
customers in China (Asia).
(2) Provision of spare parts from local warehouses and warehouses
replenished from Europe to customers in China (Asia)
Advantages - Low inventory and working capital costs.
- Low operating costs for the central warehouse in Europe.
- High availability of spare parts at the central warehouse.
- Short delivery times for parts available locally.
- High customer satisfaction due to short delivery times.
- Low logistics costs due to replenishment shipments from Europe to Asia rather than single express deliveries.
Disadvantages - High logistics costs due to express transport mode.
- Long delivery times caused by customs clearance delays.
- Low customer satisfaction due to long delivery times.
- High inventory and working capital costs.
- High costs for operating and maintaining a network of local warehouses.
- Limited availability of spare parts at the local warehouses.
Existing spare parts logistic concepts are insuffficient for the Chinese market
Cranfield UniversityIncreasing spare parts logistic performance (2)Combination of bonded and non-bonded stock could solve various challenges
Japan
Singapore*
India
Thailand
Beijing
TaiwanHong Kong
CSC AsiaShanghai
Korea
*SEA is in charge of the following countries:Malaysia VietnamIndia PhilippinesPakistan MyanmarIndonesia AustraliaNew Zeland
Spare parts center in Europe
Local warehousesHub ( bonded / non-bonded)
Cranfield University
63
Detailed processes
Delivery (physically)Document / Value transfer
Europe
SAPValue1
Europe
SAPValue1
Logistics partner /
WMSBonded stock
Logistics partner /
WMSBonded stock
End User in China
End User in China
Non-bonded stockValue 3 =
Value 2 + duty + fees
Sales Co.
Customs authoritiesCustoms
authoritiesIT-Link
Invoice for services
Delivery
Delivery
Temporary
Borrowing (only China)
Invoice (local currency)
Value3+freight+margin+VAT
Defective part
Pay
me
nt
VA
T +
d
utie
s
Vir
tua
l tr
ans
fer
of
pa
rt
Invoice (USD) Value 2
Value1 + freight + margin
Customs border
Defective part by log. partner
Credit note (USD)For defective part
Daily process Monthly/weekly process process