series 7 - university research...

City Wide Social Survey - Series 7

Dr. Christine S. Diaz

Ms. Mildred M. Estanda

Dr. Cleofe A. Arib

Ateneo de Davao UniversityE. Jacinto St.

With Funding Support from the University Research Council (URC)

Administered by: Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)

Methodology

• CWSS 7 was conducted last April 9 – 12 and April 17 – 18, 2017

• Face to Face interviews

• Random Sampling• ±4, 95 % level of significance

• 630 adults in Davao City• 3 Districts• 11 Sub-districts

• Some questions of the survey were shared by SWS to Ateneo de DavaoUniversity.




Geographical Summaries

City Wide Social Survey Series 7

Geographical Summaries

DistrictPoblacionTalomoAgdaoBuhanginBunawanPaquibatoBaguioCalinan ProperMarilogTorilTugbok Total

33.33%

33.33%

33.33%

District 1 District 2 District 3

Philippines Starting Points

Respondents

Ensuring Integrity of Data




1. Proper screening of enumerators & training.2. Training of field supervisors.3. Feedback mechanisms.4. GIS.




GIS – Geographic Information System

HARDWARE SOFTWARE

PEOPLE DATA

ID1_RID ID2_GPS ID3_Waypoint D4_Duration

107 1 107 60108 1 108 53109 1 109 5027 5 152 6828 5 153 5629 5 155 6330 5 156 5831 5 157 4532 5 158 4333 5 159 4134 5 160 32

PLOTTING

Outline of Presentation

Socio-Demographic CharacteristicsHousehold Facilities/AmenitiesHealthEnvironmentDisaster Preparedness

Labor Force Status and Profile

Financial Situation

Self-Rated Poverty

Economic Trend Indicators

K to 12

Peace and Order

Governance

Happiness

Socio Demographic

Profile




2.86

6.98

9.37 9.05 7.94

9.21

10.95 10.16

8.89

19.37

3.49

1.75

18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-70 71-75 76 andover

Age of Respondents Youngest: 18 yrs. Oldest: 85 yrs.oldMean Age: 46 yrs. old.

49.8450.16

Sex of Repondents

Male Female

23.97

67.30

8.73

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00

Single

Married

Living with partner

Civil Status

5.24

29.52

50.95

14.29

8.10

31.90

40.95

19.05

7.62

26.67

50.00

15.71

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

AB C D E

Class Dwelling


70.00

0.00 0.002.38

14.76

9.05 1.901.43

0.48

75.71

0.48 9.5210.00

0.48

1.43

79.05

0.001.90 6.19 9.05 1… 0.48 1.43

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

OwnHousehold

Mortgaged Amortizing Rights Renting Owned byrelatives

Owned byemployer

Owned bythe

government

Others, pls.specify

Home Ownership

District 1 Distrcit 2 District 3

34.76

1.43 2.384.29

13.8116.67

2.86

18.57

0.95

50.48

0.95

2.383.33 9.52

11.90

1.43

9.52

0.00

57.62

03.81

7.14

16.67

4.76 5.24 0.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Own Lot Mortgaged Amortizing Rights Renting Owned byrelatives

Owned byemployer

Owned bythe

government

Others, pls.specify

Lot Ownership


0.00

6.19 6.67

16.19

23.33

0.48

5.24

21.90 19.05

0.950.48

6.19

10.00

19.0522.86

0.95

4.29

21.90

14.29

0.000.48

8.57

12.86

18.10

26.67

0.95

2.86

14.76

13.81

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

No formaleducation

Someelementary

Completedelementary

Some HighSchool

CompletedHigh School

Somevocational

Completedvocational

Somecollege

Completedcollege

Post college

Educational Attainment

District 1 District2 District 3

90%

3%3%

0%

4%

Language Used at HomeBisaya Tagalog Cebuano Ilonggo Others

Others:Tausug, Maranao,

Kalagan, Mandaya,

Bagobo, Boholano

45.24

17.30

8.89

7.30

3.49

3.02

2.86

2.22

9.68

Ethnic Affiliation

Dabaweño Cebuano Boholano Ilonggo Mandaya Bagobo Tagalog Ilocano Others, specify

Others:Waray, Kalagan,

Bicolano, B’laan, Manobo,

Tausug, Leyteño,

Tagakaulo, Maranao,

Surigaonon, Aklanon,

Maguindanaon,

Masbateño, Iliganon,

Zamboangeño,

Siquihodnon, Antiqueño,

U-bo Manobo, Kamayo,

Diangan, Chinese, Klata,

Cagayanon

79.84

7.78

2.54 2.38 0.95 0.16

6.35

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

Roman Catholic Protestant Iglesia ni Cristo Islam Seventh dayadventist

No religion Others, specify

Religion

Others: Jehovah’s Witness,

Baptist, United Alliance,

Christian Fellowship, Mormon,

Church of God Int’l, Kingdom

of Jesus Christ, Pentecostal,

Born Again, Shani, Four

Square, Moncadista, Church in

Messiah, Apostolic Ministry of

Christ

Household Facilities




88.10

73.81

61.43

11.90

26.19

38.57

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00


Running Water into home

Yes No

Billed 98.29Not billed 1.71

98.91

1.09

93.51

6.49

50.81 49.19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DCWD Barangay

Water Connection


93.39

6.61

Perceived Water Quality

Yes No

28.0032.00

4.00

32.00

0.00

54.55

30.91

5.45

9.098.64

0.00

20.99

64.20

6.17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Pump Artesian well Deep well Spring Communal Waterfrom DCWD

Others, specify

Sources of watern=161


Perceived Water Quality

Yes 84.47

No 15.53

Others: buy water from neighbor, rain water and river

79.05

15.71

0.484.76

54.76

40.00

0.954.29

50.95

20.95 21.90

6.19

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Gripo Delivery Spring Others, specify

Primary Source of Drinking Water(multiple response)


11.9014.29

0.00

70.48

0.002.86

12.86

13.81 0.48

70.00

0.48 2.38

11.909.52

3.810.48

71.43

0.002.86

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Tap Delivery Spring Ulan Same with theprimary source

Don't know Others, specify

Secondary Source of Drinking Water(multiple response)


18.10

27.14

35.24

81.90

72.86

64.76

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90


Use of Rainwater

Yes No

87.8

12.2

Rainwater Collectorn= 172

Yes No

20.78

77.44

1.24 0.530

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Flush toilet De-buhos(manualflushing)

Diretso sakinalot nga

yuta (Direct tothe ground)

Diretso satubig ( Direct to

the water)

Type of Toilet

89.37

10.63

Toilet Ownership

Owned Shared

97.14

2.86

Electricity in the home

Yes No

36.84

31.58

31.58

Sources of Light n=18

Kerosene/Lampara

Generator

Chargeable flashlight, candles

23.81

52.38

3.33

20.00

10.00

7.622.86

31.90

51.43

0.95

15.717.14

8.10

0.95

68.57

25.71

0.48

13.33

1.43 1.900.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Firewood Gas/LiquefiedPetroleum Gas

(LPG)

Kerosene Kahoy na uling(charcoal out of

wood)

Bagol na uling(charcoal fromcoconut shell)

Butane Others, specify

Household Energy Sources for Cooking(multiple response)


TELEPHONEYes 11.27

No 88.73

Telephone Subscriptionn=71

PLDT 69.01

Globelines 18.31

BAYANTEL 12.68

Cellphone OwnershipYes 76.03

No 23.97

Network

Smart 57.20

Talk n text 23.59

Globe 25.47

Tm 20.88

Sun cellular 10.23

Abs-Cbn 0.42

For out of the country sim 0.21

Number of cellphones owned

1 - 2 92.07

3 - 5 6.89

5 and above 1.04

Household members who own a cellphone

Less than 5 82.06

5 - 8 16.03

9+ 1.90

90.95

9.05

TV Ownership

With television Without television

With TV

n=573

With cable 11.52

Without cable 88.58

66.67

21.64

6.46 5.060.17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Daily, 3+hours

Daily, 1-2hours

Daily, lessthan an

hour

A few daysa weel

Refused toanswer

Number of hours watching TV everyday

59.05

40.95

Radio Ownership

With radio Wtihout radio

30.11

29.30

11.29

25.54

3.49

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Daily, 3+ hours a day

Daily, 1 - 2 hours a day

Daily, less than an hour a day

A few days per week

Never

Number of hours listening to the radio everyday n=372

48.25

51.75

Transportation

With transportation Without transportation

87.78

12.22

Do you commute?

Yes No

80.95

18.10

1.43

17.6220.00 11.90 10.95

3.81

80.95

12.86 0.95

26.67 24.76

8.57 11.43 0.48

52.38

0.48

50.00

22.8622.86

11.90

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Mode of Transportation(multiple response)


Health




80.79

19.05

Do you consider yourself healthy?

Yes No

Reasons for being healthy

n=509

Wala koy nabati na sakit sa lawas ( I feel well)

Wala koy problema ( I do not have a problem)

Aduna koy kwarta ( I have money)

Makatulog ko ug tarung ( I can sleep well)

Maayo akong pamatasan (I have good disposition)

Maayo akong relasyon sa komunidad ( I have good relationship with the community)

Malipayon ko ( I am happy)

Aduna koy kalinaw sa panghuna-huna ( I have peace of mind)

Kontento sa akong kinabuhi ( I am contented with my life)

Reasons for not being healthy

n=120

Naa koy nabati na sakit sa lawas ( I do not feel well)

Naay problema ( I have a problem)

Walay kwarta ( I do not have money)

Dili ko katulog ug tarung ( I cannot sleep well)

Dili maayo ako pamatasan ( I do not have good disposition)Dili ko kontento sa akong kinabuhi ( I am not contented with my life)

Family Members who got sick over the

last 6 months

n=297

Daughter 30.64

Son 29.29Mother 19.87

Father 19.87

Number of Family Members who got sick over the

last 6 months

1 67.68

2 23.23

3 5.72

4 2.36

5 0.67

6 0.34

47.14

52.86

Family members who got sick over the last 6 months

Yes No

40.07

33.00

28.28

6.40

6.06

5.39

5.39

4.71

31.99

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Ubo (Cough)

Kalintura (Fever)

Sipon (Colds)

Diabetes

High blood

Hubak (Asthma)

UTI

Diarrhea

Others

Illness(multiple response)

Others: Dengue, Pneumonia, Cancer, TB, Kidney failure

61.00

32.00

6.00 8.00

74.23

31.96

2.06 3.09

63.00

35.00

8.005.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

Consulted a private doctor Self - medicate Went to the health center Others

Manner of Treating the Illnesses n=297


Others: waited for the illness to heal on its own, consulted traditional doctors, used herbal medicines

40.63

58.10

1.27

Do you know of any illnesses in the community?

Yes No Do Not Know

57.33

52.0049.33

6.674.00

24.00

13.3312.00

53.49

45.3543.02

9.30 16.28 6.98 1.16 22.09

57.89

36.84

46.32

7.375.26

11.58

7.37

2.114.21

22.11

Ubo (Cough)

Sipon(Colds)

Kalintura(Fever)

Diarrhea Hubak(Asthma)

High blood Diabetes Skindisease

Lungdisease

Others


Illness in the community

(multiple response) n=256

Others: dengue,

cancer and

pneumonia

76.03

23.97

Awareness on HIV

Yes No

65.24

34.76

Awareness on the spread of HIV in the city n=479

Yes No

Sources of Information (multiple response)

TV 83.5

Radyo 19.42

Barangay Health Center 8.74

Newspaper 7.28

Neighbor 6.55

Friends 6.55

Internet 5.34

52.91

46.84

Awareness of HIV testing facilitiesn=412

Yes No

Disaster Preparedness




44.29

0.00

4.292.86

25.24

4.30

24.76

2.86 2.861.43

21.90

2.87

22.38

14.76

3.33 2.864.76

6.21

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

Flood Drought Earthquake Landslide Fire Others

Hazards in the Community


Others: traffic, robbery, riot, theft, hold-up

37.7835.08

16.1917.62

9.377.46

39.52

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Stock food andwater

Stock candlesand flashlight

Listen to radio tofollow the news

Safe place torelocate

Stock materialsfor flood

Made repairs inthe house

None

Preparations in case of disaster(multiple response)

Training Provider (multiple response)

Barangay 63.23

Central 911 4.52

Don't know 1.29

Others: (Company, School,Workplace

and BFP) 30.97

Drills given in the community (multiple

response)

Earthquake drill 69.03

Fire drill 60.00

Flood drill 27.74

Violence response drill 14.19

Tsunami drill 6.45

Storm drill 5.81

24.60

75.40

Participation in Disaster Preparedness

Yes No

Earthquake preparedness

Household

Evacuation plan 30.95


Communication plan 13.97

Survival kit 5.40

None 43.65

Community




Survival kit 6.51

None 48.10

Typhoon preparedness

Household



Survival kit 7.30

Secured important docs 9.84

None 47.62

Community



Survival kit 9.37

Secured important docs 3.97

None 50.32

Environment




86.03

7.94

6.03

Willingness to participate in climate change mitigation

Yes No Do not know

46.02

51.70

28.41

28.98

23.86

0.57

1.14

16.48

43.48

51.09

22.83

37.50

21.20

1.09

1.63

11.96

30.77

45.05

40.11

34.62

18.13

10.44

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Waste segregation

Reduce,Re-use-Recycling

Tree planting

Hindi pagsunog ng basura, plastic and rubber

Conserving electricity

Using environmentally friendly appliances

Using renewable energy

Conserving waterActivities to mitigate

climate change


34.13

48.73

16.51

Better Same as before Worse thanbefore

Air cleanliness of the city

34.13

53.97

10.95

Better Same as before Worse thanbefore

Water Quality

62.86

30.95

3.65

Better Same as before Worse than before

Cleanliness of Davao City

40.79

59.21

Awareness on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management

Ordinance of Davao City

Yes No

57.59

24.12

18.29

Compliance on the ordinance (n=257)

Yes No Do not know

17.46

25.87

26.03

25.56

55.24

63.97

66.35

65.40

16.83

4.44

3.49

5.08

4.13

0.32

0.48

1.43

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00

Our water source in the city will NOT be depleted.

There is a need to rehabilitate the watershed

I have a responsibility in rehabilitating the water source

I am willing to pay for the rehabilitation of our watershed

Perception on Watershed Protection

Strongly Disagree Disgaree Agree Strongly Agree

Who has the GREATEST responsibility to rehabilitate the

watershed?

Ordinary Citizens 45.40

Local Government Unit 30.79

National Government 18.25

74.44

25.56

Heard about organic products?

Yes No

31.34

68.66

Do you buy organic products? (n=415)

Yes No

46.94

17.69

4.08

22.45

7.0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Once amonth

Twice amonth

Thrice amonth

Four timesa month

None

Purchase of Organic Products per Month (n=147)What product do you buy? (n=147)

Gulay (vegetables) 69.39

Bugas (rice) 12.24

Prutas (fruits) 3.40

Karneng manok (chicken) 2.04

Where do you purchase the

products? (n=147)Organized organic market

bazaar 31.29

Supermarket 23.81

specialized organic

product store 21.09

Market 13.61

Neighbor 6.12

14.620.16

85.279.84

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

CWSS series 6 CWSS series 7

Awareness on Renewable Energy

Yes No

Type of renewable energy (n= 127)

Solar power 90.55

Hydro power 31.50

Wind power 17.32

Geothermal power 14.96

Biomass 4.72

68.89

60.00

26.67

70.00

55.00

20.00

54.5550.00

18.18

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

News Television Internet / Social Media

Top 3 Source of Information on Renewable Energy


Electricity bill will be lower 71.68

I can help the environment 23.01

Reasons for willingness to use solar power

Reasons for unwillingness to use solar power

Using solar energy is costly 50.00

Using solar energy is not easy 50.00

26.83

73.17

Awareness of putting a Mega Harbor in the City

Yes No

Labor Force Profile and Status




55.71

50.4851.9

36.67

40.9539.52

7.62 8.57 8.57

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


WORK STATUS

Has a job

Does not have a job now but had a job before

Never had a job

63.1

33.8

3.2

42.444.3

13.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Has a job Does not have a job nowbut had a job before

Never had a job

Male Female

Work Status vs. Sex

45.1

37.6

54

41.743

55.8

52.7

40.9

46.5

35

44.4 45

33.9

39.05

1415.9

1213.8

1210.3

8.25

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5 CWSS 6 CWSS 7

Work status TREND

Has a job Does not have a job now but had a job before Never had a job

10.16

4.88

4.07

80.89

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

1-3 months ago

4-6 months ago

6-12 months ago

More than a year ago

Last Time Davaoeño had a job(n =246)

35 3638

65 6462

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


Not Working but Looking for work (n=298)

Yes

No

Reason why not working but looking for work (n=108)

15.7

8.3

2.8

18.5

5.6

43.5

4.6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Never had a job

Did not voluntarily leave the job

Laid off from work

Contract ended and not renewed

Business closed operations

voluntarily left job

waiting for the result of application

Available to have a job in the next two

weeks (n=108)

63.6 62.2

57.9

36.4 37.8

42.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


Yes No

92.4

7.6

Willing to start a job in the next two weeks (n=66)

Yes No

Among those working (n= 332)

45.3

51.3

3.4

42.5 54.7 2.8

33.9

66.1

0.00.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

Hired Self-employed Unpaid family worker


40.7

57.2

2.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70


Hired, self-employed or unpaid family worker

53.7

47

44.4

49.4

5450.5

40.739.7

47

48.1

47.643.2

40.3

57.2

6.7 6 7.4

3 2.8

9.2

2.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70



TYPE of Employment n % %

Private Enterprise 104 32

Registered 89.4

Not Registered 10.6

Self-employed 192 59.08

Registered 29.7

Not Registered 71.3

Government 29 8.92

34.5

54.9

10.6

34.9

55.3

8.7

25.7

67.0

7.3

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Private Enterprise

Self-Employed

Government


Type of employment by district

34.1

23

10.4

11.9

4.4

14.8

1.5

0 10 20 30 40 50

Blue Collar

professional/technician

Community worker

Non Agri/Skilled

Agriculture

clerical/admin/sales

Manager

If hired, what type of work (n=135)

1.9

4.7

3.7

5.7

9.0

28.2

22.6

17.4

19.1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Boarding House owner/Custodian

Construction

On call massues/manicure/pedicure

Online Business/Small Scale Bus.

Driving

Others, specify

Sari-sari store

Farming

Food Vending/vendor

Type of Business of the self-employed (n=190)

Others: Artist, car shop, automobile shop, internet café, lending

31.75

38.73

17.78

68.25

61.27

82.22

0

20

40

60

80

100

SSS PhilHealth Pag-Ibig

YES

NO

Whether Davaoeño paid…

Among those who pay…

0.0

9.3 9.3

14.8

11.0

14.8

16.5

12.1 12.1

0.0

9.7 12.0 14.3 11.5 13.8 15.2 13.8 9.70.0

12.1

14.0

20.6

8.4

13.1

15.9

8.47.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59

SSS/GSIS Philhealth Pag-ibig

SSS/GSIS: n=200Philhealth: n=246Pag-ibig: n= 113

Benefit received in the past three months (multiple response) Min. number of working hours/day: 1

Maxi. number of working hours/day: 18Median: 8.96

33.3

7.4

32.6

44.4

0 10 20 30 40 50

Regular Salary increase

Additional Benefits

Productivity Bonus

No benefits at all

29.5

70.5

Yes No

Wanted to increase working hours? (n=325)

Whether looking for additional Work (n=325)

Reasons for looking additional work (multiple response)

2.3

7.9

8.1

9

17.4

11.6

60.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

I have maintenance for illness

others

Can not spend for liesure

Additional income or savings

I have obligation

Numerous loans

Can not buy enough for my needs

Perceived availability of Jobs next year Ease or difficulty in finding a Job today

69.1

15.7

3.8

11.4

68.1 12.9 9.1 9.9

64.8

15.2

8.611.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

More No Change Fewer Jobs Don't Know


34.0

21.4

40.3

4.3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Easy to find Neither easynor hard to

find

Difficult tofind

Don't Know

Whether easy to find job in Davao City in 12 months

16.2

49

43.545.7

32.4

2122.4

24.1

46.5

2022.4

25.4

4.9

1011.7

4.80

10

20

30

40

50

60

CWSS 4 CWSS 5 CWSS 6 CWSS 7

Easy to find Neither easy nor difficult Difficult to find Don't Know

23.3

21.9

21.9

76.7

78.1

78.1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

District 1

District 2

Dsitrict 3

No Yes Aspiration to work abroad

Looking for a job abroad

85.4% said NO 14.6% replied YES

1 in every 5 Davaoeno belong to a HH with an OFW

7.46

2.99

26.12

19.0

47.01

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Mother

Father

Son

Others

Daughter

Others: aunt/uncle, in-laws, cousins

Family member working as OFW (multiple response)

Mode of Hiring (n=134)

Direct hiring (On-line)

19%

Thru Agency43%

Walk-in5%

Referral (Friends/Relativ

es)21%

Others, specify12%

Agency Fee: Median: P 32,000Max amount: P 80,000

Singapore and

Malaysia

Japan and

KoreaUAE, Kuwait

and Saudi Arabia

USA and Canada

In what country are they working?

North America

15.7%

Europe 4.5%

East Asia 22.4%

Middle East 43.3%

Southeast Asia 7.5%

Seafarer1.5%

France and London

Oceania 5.2%

Australia and New Zealand

Remittance Allocation

(n=88)

Food 1

Education 2

Utilities 3

Health 4

Savings 5

Payment for loans/ debt 6

Entertainment 7

Transportation 8

Often51%

Sometimes

21%

Seldom7%

Never21%

Frequency of sending remittance (n=134)

Monthly Family Income

Mean: P 16,509Min: P 500.00Max: P150,000.00STD: 7365

Monthly Individual Income

Mean: P5,089Min: P200.00Max: P100, 000.00STD: 12594.6

Family Income Allocation

Food 1

Utilities 2

Education 3

Transportation 4

Payment for Loans 5

Health 6

Entertainment 7

Savings 8

FINANCIAL SITUATION




Financial Situation in the past three months

23.2

63.5

13.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Income is notenough

Just enough income With savings

7.5

5

20

14.17

24.17

9.2

43.33

0 10 20 30 40 50

Help from private sector

Help from the government

Relatives

Savings of the family

Additional income

Others

Loans

Sources of additional funding (multiple response)

Efforts to reduce Expenditure (n=144)

77.7885.7 85.71

22.22

14.3 14.29

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90


Yes No

Perceived financial situation in the next three months Source of funds for next three months

(multiple response)

3.88

3.88

19.38

16.28

18.6

37.21

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Help from private sector

Help from the government

Relatives

Savings of the family

Others

Loans

20.5

60.5

17.9

1.10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Income willnot be

enough

Income willbe enough

Might be ableto save

Don't Know

Financial Assistance receivedHad loan in the past year

How many loans last year?

Minimum: 1Maximum: 52Median: 2

17.5

8.4

17.8

4.4

2.4

2.7

3.7

61.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Money given

Monetary loan

Food

Non-food items

work

Support in education

any other form of service

None

Yes58%

No42%

What is loaned? (multiple response)

82.14% 14.01% 5%6.87%

Who is the lender (multiple response)

15.7

7.1

0.5

3.6

3.3

3.0

11.0

20.1

19.5

10.2

15.7

5.5

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0

Credit Cooperative

Bank

Credit Card

SSS/GSIS/Pag-ibig

Resource Pooling "Paluwagan"

Employer

Micro-finance

Friends

Five-six

Relatives

Store

Others

Borrow from cooperative (n=260)

Member of a cooperative

72.92

27.08

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Personal Business

Purpose of borrowing (n=96)

20.6

79.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Yes No

73.8

26.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Yes No

Attempted to loan from the bank

8.1

91.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Yes No

Refused by the bank (n=51)

Yes16%

No84%

Whether with credit cards

Min: 1Max: 3

Use of credit cards (multiple response)

3.2

96.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Yes No

80

35

30 30

10

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Food Clothes Travel Gadget MEDICINE Equipment

Whether with savingsWhere the savings are placed

(multiple response)

55

8

2

40

4

51

10 0

34

2

78

15

0

52

11

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Bank Cooperative Resource Pooling"Paluwagan"

Piggy Bank Others

Dist 1 Dist 2 Dist 3

Reason for saving (multiple response)Perception on savings in the next

three months (n=233)

7.3

8.6

15.5

9.4

76.4

0 20 40 60 80 100

For Business

For Investment

Education of Children

others

Emergency purposes

11.2

61.8

27.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Can not save Not easy nordifficult to save

Difficult to save

Common skills in the community (multiple response)

7.6

21.4

51.0

20.5

18.1

3.3

9.5

5.2

3.8

14.8

5.71

24.76

48.10

21.43

20.00

6.67

6.67

6.19

10.00

7.1

4.8

12.9

37.6

18.1

10.5

2.9

3.8

1.4

51.0

7.1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Arts and Crafts

Mechanical Skills

Carpentry

Automotive

Entrepreneurial

Computer Programming

Food Technology

Computer Seceretarial

Farming

Other, specify


Natural Resources in the community

27.1

1.9

17.1

44.3

21.9 3.3 28.1 40.5

28.6

3.3

56.2

14.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Water resources Mineral resources Land Resources Wala Kabalo / Refused to answer


Usual sources of income in the community

8.1 9.1

2.5

12.9

8.1

43.8

6.2

1.4

44.3

18.1

12.95.7 2.9

21.4

14.3

51.4

10.0

1.9 38.111.4

53.8

6.213.3

9.55.7

30.5

1.9

2.4

25.7

11.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Whether a training on business was given to the community

Who provided the training? (n=169)

Yes, 26.8

No, 72.5

3.0

76.9

1.2 1.05.3

11.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

NGO Barangay Academe Church PrivateSector

Others

Others:

4Ps, gov’t and coop

Self-Rated Poverty




Perceived poverty status

3 3 3.2 35.6 3.5 4.92

82 80

86 8480.7

83.5 84.92

15 17

11 13 13.7 1310.16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


Not poor On the Line Poor Linear (On the Line)

Perceived poverty status across districts

5.2 6.72.9

84.3 85.2 85.2

10.58.1

11.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90


Not poor On the Line Poor

Among those who experienced hunger, how often (n=75)

119

15

89 9185

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100


Yes No

Experience Hunger by District

25.3

66.7

6.7

1.30

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Once a month At least twice amonth

Often Always

Past six months there is a widening gap between the rich and poor

49

27

32.7

28.3

24.1

33

57

46.4 47.2

51.0

13 1316

22.3 21.7

34.9 5

2.2 2.7

CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5 CWSS 6 CWSS 7

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

Responsibility of Davao City local government to close the gap

19.5

33

25.1 24.1

54.5

47.545.7

51.0

18

13.2

18.421.7

3.1 2.2 2.5 2.7

4.8 4.1

8.3

0.50

10

20

30

40

50

60

CWSS 4 CWSS 5 CWSS 6 CWSS 7

Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know

Economic Trend Indicators




Quality of Life

51 50.2

43

51.9

45.1

33.736.7

23 22.1

33

25.8

34

51.7

47.9

2426.4

2422.3

20

14.6 15.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Better now than before The same More difficult now

Quality of Life in three Districts

41.044.3

14.6

35.2 50.5 14.2

32.4

47.1

20.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Better now than before The same More difficult now


Personal optimism

3632.7

44.8

45.4 50

56.753.2

35

43.3

42

47.1

32

37.940.6

1412.7 13.2

7.65 5.4 6.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Will be better The same Will be worse

Perception on the local economy

51

41.02

5754.9

73 74.2 73.8

36

42.6

33

38.5

14

22.8 23.4

1216.02

96.6

2 3.0 2.70

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


Will be better The same Will be worse

K TO 12




86.03

13.97

yes

no

Are you aware of K to 12?

22.51

77.49

yes

no

Is there a family member enrolled in Grade 11 this year? (n=542)

56.56

40.98

2.46

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

public school

privateschool

don't know

public or private school? n = 122

45.943.44

10.66

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

yes no don't know

if enrollee availed the voucher system? n = 122

85.71

64.29

19.64

16.07

7.14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

amount of the voucher is enough

process of availment is clear

process of availment is not tedious

documentary requirements are easy to comply

release of the voucher amount is timely

Reasons for satisfaction on the voucher system (n=56)multiple response

18.86

40.5

18.86

7.54

15.1

3.78

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

amount of the voucher is not enough

The process of availment is not clear

The proces of availment is tedious

The documentary requirements are difficult to comply

The release of the voucher amount is late

others

Reasons for dissatisfaction on the voucher system (n=53)multiple response

54.43

42.54

4.29

8.57

0.16

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00

additional expense

longer time to finish schooling

looking for a school

choosing the track

others

Challenges of K to 12 implementation (multiple response)n = 542

39.05

44.44

13.97

16.19

0.16

0.16

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Lack of teachers

Classrooms

Preparation of teachers

Teaching resources

Students' readiness

others

Challenges in Grade 11 (multiple response) n = 542

ASEAN

INTEGRATION




24.76%

75.24%

Yes

No

Awareness on ASEAN Integration

24.4

58.3

1.9 0.6

14.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Stronglyagree

Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

Don't know

For the next 12 months, ASEAN Integration will have

positive effects on Mindanao (n=156)

19.2

49.4

9.6

1.3

20.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't know

Mindanao is ready for ASEAN Integration (n=156)

PEACE AND ORDER




36.03

67.94

60.16

20.95

19.05

39.52

21.11

22.54

13.17

11.27

0.16

0 20 40 60 80

Absence of gangs, juvenile delinquency

Absence of violent crimes/assaults

Absence of drugs/Drug trafficking

Absence of loose firearms /weapons

Absence on insurgency

Absence of terrorism

Availability of work opportunities

Food security

Freedom from debt patronage

There is reasonable distibution of wealth or riches

Others

Definitions of peace and order

Others: cooperation, unity, discipline, development

Threats to peace and order (1=least, 6=greatest)

21.27

17.46

27.62

15.4

20.95

34.13

25.24

11.9

16.51

21.75

17.94

20.95

15.4

21.11

18.25

12.86

14.44

19.05

13.17

12.54

15.87

10.32

7.46

9.68

12.7

9.05

6.51

8.41

6.35

10.95

7.78

10.32

9.68

6.83

9.21

27.3

31.75

15.71

22.06

23.49

12.38

16.83

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

terrorist type of bombings

drugs and drug trafficking

calamities and disasters

poverty

killings

DDS

criminal incidents

6

5

4

3

2

1

45.71

57.94

71.75

69.37

75.24

76.03

81.90

70.79

19.68

30.48

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00

Speed Limit Ordinance

Anti-smoking Ordinance

Anti-Discrimination Ordinance

Liqour Ban Ordinance

Anti-Nuisance Ordinance

Women's Development Code

Anti-Jaywalking Ordinance

Garbage Segregation and Waste DisposalOrdinance

Halal Food Certifcation Ordinance

Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance

always

sometimes

not at all

don't know

Ordinance Compliance

INFRASTRUCTURE




43.17

33.81

10.48

7.78

3.33

1.43

38.57

40.48

9.21

8.73

0.79

2.22

37.14

36.67

10.63

11.9

0.79

2.86

29.37

30.32

14.76

14.76

1.27

7.94

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

very big improvement

big improvement

little improvement

no improvement

worse

don't knowPublic parks

Public hospitals

Public schools

Roads, bridges, canals

Improvement in public infrastructure for the past 12 months

27.62

38.89

11.27

17.46

2.54

2.22

23.97

37.14

14.6

18.73

2.54

3.02

23.02

34.6

16.35

17.46

5.4

3.17

17.14

25.56

15.24

14.29

24.29

3.49

42.86

34.76

6.03

11.11

1.11

4.13

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

very bigimprovement

big improvement

little improvement

no improvement

worse

don't know

911 services

traffic system

transportation system

garbage disposal

electric power

Improvement in services for the past 12 months

Satisfaction rating: Performance of government officials

Very satisfiedSomewhat

satisfiedsomewhat dissatisfied

very dissatisfied refused to answer don't know

President Rodrigo Duterte 88.57 9.05 0.95 0.48 0.63 0.32

VP Leni Robredo 14.44 33.33 19.05 26.83 2.22 4.13

National administration 59.37 29.84 6.67 1.11 0.48 2.53

Senate 33.49 42.22 13.65 5.05 0.95 4.64

House of Representatives 36.67 39.37 12.70 2.86 1.43 6.97

Supreme Court 37.14 37.94 10.79 4.92 1.27 7.94

Senate President 42.70 37.62 10.48 2.70 0.79 5.71

Speaker of the House 39.05 38.10 10.95 3.17 1.59 7.14

Mayor Sarah Duterte-Carpio 90.00 8.25 0.79 0.00 0.32 0.64

Vice Mayor Paolo Duterte 74.60 17.46 4.13 1.11 0.79 1.91

District representative 60.79 24.60 4.44 3.97 0.63 5.57

Local council 62.86 24.44 5.24 2.06 0.48 4.92

Barangay officials 57.78 22.38 9.52 6.35 0.95 3.02

Satisfaction rating

88.57

9.05

0.95 0.48 0.63

President Rodrigo Duterte

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

somewhat dissatisfied

very dissatisfied

refused to answer

don't know

14.44

33.33

19.05

26.83

2.22 4.13

Vice President Leni Robredo

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied


very dissatisfied

refused to answer

don't know

Satisfaction rating

59.37

29.84

6.67

1.11

0.48

2.53

33.49

42.22

13.65

5.05

0.95

4.64

36.67

39.37

12.7

2.86

1.43

6.97

37.14

37.94

10.79

4.92

1.27

7.94

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied


very dissatisfied

refused to answer

don't know

Supreme Court

House of Representatives

Senate

National administration

Satisfaction rating

42.7

37.62

10.48

2.7

0.79

5.71

39.05

38.1

10.95

3.17

1.59

7.14

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied


very dissatisfied

refused to answer

don't know

Speaker of the House

Senate President

Satisfaction rating

90

8.25

0.79

0

0.32

0.64

74.6

17.46

4.13

1.11

0.79

1.91

60.79

24.6

4.44

3.97

0.63

5.57

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied


very dissatisfied

refused to answer

don't know

District representatives

Vice Mayor Paolo Duterte

Mayor Sarah Duterte-Carpio

Satisfaction rating

62.86

24.44

5.24

2.06

0.48

4.92

57.78

22.38

9.52

6.35

0.95

3.02

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied


very dissatisfied

refused to answer

don't know

Barangay officials

Local council

Top three local problems

1. Illegal drugs

2. Traffic

3. Poverty/job opportunities

35.08

55.08

3.81

1.11

4.92

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

strongly agree

agree

disagree

strongly disagree

No answer, don't know

The local government of Davao City addresses the concerns of ordinary people

40.63

54.44

0.32

1.75

2.86

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

yes

no

no opinion

refused to answer

don't know

Do you believe in the presence of the Davao Death Squad (DDS)?

12.89

18.75

51.95

16.41

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

There are witnesses

There are empiric data

There is a continuing pattern ofkillings

others

If you believe in the presence of DDS, why? (n=256)

Others: Based on observation and town talks, news, etc.

14.58

16.03

7.29

53.94

8.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

media hype

myth

used by political opponents of the present administration

no concrete evidence

others

If you do not believe in the presence of DDS, why? (n=343)

6.83

12.06

9.37 9.37

34.92

12.8614.59

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

against humanrights

unjust just immoral can solvecriminality

don't know,refused to answer

others

Opinion on DDS

Others: not true, exaggeration, no evidence, just being used by political opponents of the President

FEDERALISM




63.81

35.71

0.48

Have you heard of federalism?

yes no no opinion

54.73

23.38

30.1

12.69

4.73

4.48

0.25

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

will facillitate distribution ofresources

can solve the peace problem

can empower regions

will promote more accountability

may lead to secessionism

will encourage political dynasties

others

Basic information about federalism multiple response (n=402)

Others: change in government, separate income for local government, local improvement, independent powers, etc.

86.57

16.92

7.46

6.22

4.48

1.99

4.48

7.21

0.25

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 90.00100.00

Television

Radio

Internet

Forum

School

Church

Friends

Neighbors/Local Talk/Tsismis

Others

Sources on information on Federalism multiple response (n=402)

Others: seminars, President Duterte, barangay officials, research, own analysis

41.29

41.29

5.72

0.5

2.99

0.25

7.96

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

strongly agree

agree

disagree

strongly disagree

no opinion

refused to answer

don't know

Based on what you know, are you in favor of federalism? (n=402)

30.85

45.52

7.71

1.744.48

0.25

9.45

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no opinion refused to answer don't know

Do you favor Charter Change in order to pursue a federal type of government? (n=402)

ANTI ILLEGAL

DRUGS CAMPAIGN




45.71

53.97

0.320

10

20

30

40

50

60

yes no refused toanswer/no opinion

Awareness on the existence of illegal drugs in the community for the past 6 months

46.18

3.82

84.72

1.04 0.350

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Marijuana Cocaine Shabu Ecstacy Others

If yes, what type of illegal drugs? multiple response (n=288)

Others: “vulca”, rugby, solvent

24.31

5.56

2.08

2.43

1.04

0.69

19.79

76.74

0.35

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Television

Radio

Internet

Forum

School

Church

Friends

Neighbors/Local Talk.Tsismis

Others

Sources of information about the drug problem in the community

multiple response (n=288)

Others: barangay, hospital,

72.22

26.74

0.35 0.69

Awareness on the presence of drug users in the community (n=288)

Yes No Refused to answer Don't know

45.14

52.78

0.35 1.73

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Yes No Refused toanswer

Don't know

Awareness on the presence of drug pushers in the community (n=288)

46.53

53.47

Awareness on community-based rehabilitation in the community for drug

surrenderees (n=288)

Yes No

93.4

5.90.35 0.35

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

yes no no opinion don't know

Willingness to support community-based rehabilitationprograms (n=288)

96.53

2.43 0.350.69

yes

no

no answer

don't know

whether or not Davaoeños are in favor of Duterteadministration's manner of solving the illegal drugs problem

(n=288)

60.07

34.38

4.171.38

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

strongly agree agree disagree stronglydisagree

Operation Tokhang (“Knock and Plea”)

44.44

33.68

17.36

2.78 1.74

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

stronglyagree

agree disagree stronglydisagree

don't know

public reading of names of personalities involved in illegal drugs (n=288)

45.14

39.93

48.61

0.35

0 20 40 60

will not engage in illegal drugtrade

will not use illegal drugs

will join activities to educatepeople about the bad effects of

illegal drugs

others

Nature of support to the Anti-illegal Drugs Campaign


others: report to authorities, promote sports, pray, etc.

82.29

15.28

1.74 0.35 0.340

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

very satisfied satisfied somewhatdissatisfied

verydissatisfied

don't know

Performance of Duterte administration in addressing the problem on illegal drugs

(n=288)

79.84

19.68

0.32 0.16

yes

no

refused to answer

don't know

Awareness on Extra Judicial Killings (EJK)

10.54

27.44

42.74

9.34

5.57

0.4

3.97

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

stronglyagree

agree disagree stronglydisagree

no opinion refused toanswer

don'tknow

if respondents agree or disagree on the alleged EJK (n=503)

22.27

40.16

15.71

8.15

0.6

2.19

10.92

0 10 20 30 40 50

very satisfied

somewhatsatisfied

somewhatdissatisfied

very dissatisfied

no opinion

refused to answer

don't know

Satisfaction on Senate hearing about EJK (n=503)

21.27

40.16

34.39

4.2

0 10 20 30 40 50

done by the police

done by drugsyndicates

done by vigilantes

others

Opinion on EJK multiple response

45.24 45.56

0.48 0.32

8.4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

yes no no opinion refused to answer don't know

Is there a fair justice system in the Philippines?

60.63

33.33

4.44 0.49 1.110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

very credible credible not so credible refused to answer don't know

Perceptions on Duterte administration in terms of CREDIBILITY

62.38

31.11

4.76 0.16 0.63 0.960

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

very transparent transparent not sotransparent

no opinion refused toanswer

don't know

Perceptions on Duterte administration in terms of TRANSPARENCY

26.67

47.62

22.38

2.06

0.79

0.48

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

strongly agree

agree

disagree

stronglydisagree

no opinion

don't know

Are you in favor of the choice of words of President Duterte?

51.11

44.29

35.71

31.59

25.24

9.37

6.83

6.98

5.40

9.05

7.46

10.48

3.65

0.48

0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00

Fighting Criminality

Employment Generation

Higher salary of workers

Fight corruption

Lowering the prices of commodities

Enforcing the rule of law

Lowering of taxes

Protecting the environment

Control population growth

Address traffic problem

Federalism

Terrorism

Improvement of the Business climate

Charter change

Issues that must be addressed by President Dutertewithin the next 6 months

79.21

16.35

0.79

0.48

3.17

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

yes

no

no opinion

refused to answer

don't know

Are you in favor of the President's move to forge closer ties with China?

80.79

16.51

0.16

0.32

2.22

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

yes

no

no opinion

refused to answer

don't know

Are you in favor of the President Duterte's direction of forging closer ties with

countries other than the US?

72%

28%

Are you aware of the territorial claim of the Philippines on the West Philippine Sea?

yes no

53.42

40.18

3.53

17.22

0.22

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

CONTINUE BILATERAL TALKS

SUSTAIN OWNERSHIP OF THE PHILIPPINE TERRITORY

SUSPEND US MILITARY OPERATIONS

IMPROVE BILATERAL TRADE WITH CHINA

OTHERS

Suggestions regarding the West Philippine Sea issue


11.48

46.58

11.26

14.13

0.66

6.39

1.55

1.77

5.96

6.39

0 10 20 30 40 50

The Chinese are bullying theFilipinos

They are intruding in the Philippineterritory

They have the technology to putthose installations

They are destroying theenvironment

None

No answer

No opinion

Refused to answer

Don't know

Others

Perceptions towards the Chinese regarding the installation of facilities at

the Scarborough Shoal multiple response (n=453)

10.63

39.05

23.49

5.87

0.16

7.94

0.63

12.23

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

StronglyAgree

Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree

Noanswer

Ihonestlyhave noopinion

Refusedto

answer

Ihonestly

wouldnot

know

Do you agree or disagree on the position of President Duterte about the Benham Rise issue that he will not

stop China for now, but will raise the matter at an appropriate time?

50.63

21.59

21.27

9.37

22.54

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

They help boost the economyof Davao City

They are peaceful residents ofDavao City

They are competing with thelocal business

They are also Davaoeños

They are law-abiding

Others

Perceptions towards the Chinese living in Davao City

multiple response

25.56

54.29

9.68

1.9

3.17

5.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

I honestly have no opinion

I honestly would not know

Do you agree or disagree on the national administration's seeming friendliness of the Philippines with Russia?

2.86

96.5

0.32 0.32

YES NO NO OPINION DON'T KNOW

Are you in favor of the move to impeach President Rodrigo R. Duterte?

46.19 50

0.32 0.95 0.48 2.06

YES NO NO ANSWER NO OPINION REFUSED TO ANSWER

DON'T KNOW

Are you in favor of the plan to impeach Vice President Leni Robredo?

If President Duterte was able to fulfill his promises to the Filipinos in terms of the following:

yes no

Climate Change 58.89 41.11

Agriculture and fisheries 79.68 20.32

Peace process 88.25 11.75

Peace and order/security 91.90 8.10

Fast internet and connectivity 49.68 50.32

Federalism 56.67 43.33

Corruption 84.92 15.08

Promotion of human rights 70.48 29.52

Freedom of Information (FOI) 78.73 21.27

International Relations 87.30 12.70

yes no

Jobs and Employment 84.13 15.87

Mining and illegal logging 75.24 24.76

Lumads and ancestral domain 77.62 22.38

OFW Welfare 89.21 10.79

Taxation 74.44 25.56

Women's Rights 83.02 16.98

Transportation 79.52 20.48

Infrastructure 88.57 11.43

Reproductive Health 85.4 14.6

Top three issues President Duterte must pursue within the next year

1. Corruption

2. Illegal Drugs

3. Jobs/employment

Top 3 issues that must be included in the next SONA of President Duterte

1. Illegal drugs

2. Corruption

3. Peace and order/ Poverty

Aspirations of Davaoeñosfor Davao City1. employment/job opportunities

2. Peace and security

3. Drug-free city

4. No traffic

https://www.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://img.clipartall.com/traffic-20clipart-traffic-clip-art-1300_1095.jpg&imgrefurl=http://clipartall.com/clipart/11923-traffic-clip-art.html&docid=wHMnzC4vBEDM0M&tbnid=0KyDOHAZmNG6XM:&vet=1&w=1300&h=1095&bih=775&biw=1440&ved=0ahUKEwiglZDqh6jUAhXRNpQKHfkJBmwQMwgjKAQwBA&iact=c&ictx=1








53.17

53.97

55.56

45.87

43.65

29.37

70.48

49.05

50.79

22.22

19.68

59.68

60.16

48.41

60.32

74.76

63.97

76.51

44.13

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Violence Against Women

Child Labor

Human Trafficking

Discrimination

Extra Judicial Killings

Marital Infidelity

Drug Use and Abuse

Prostitution

Teenage Pregnancy

Divorce in the Philippines

Same Sex Marriage

Family Planning (Pro-Choice)

Access to Justice

Lumad issues

HIV-AIDS

Unemployment

Environmental Protection

Corruption

West Philippine Sea Dispute

Important Social Issues

70.16

21.27

1.437.14

Closure of mining sites in the Philippines

yes no refused to answer don't know

71.43

21.75

0.48

6.34

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

yes no refused toanswer

don't know

Restoration of ROTC in curriculum

74.29

18.73

0.32

6.66

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

yes

no

refused to answer

don't know

Restoration of CAT in curriculum

26.03

71.43

1.11 1.43

Plan to distribute condom in high school

yes no refused to answer don't know

51.11

46.51

0.63

1.75

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

yes

no

refused to answer

don't know

Plan to distribute condoms in tertiary schools

92.54

6.51

0.16

0.79

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

yes

no

refused to answer

don't know

Plan to have mandatory drug test in schools

70.16

26.19

1.11

2.54

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Yes

No

Refused to answer

Don't know/Can't tell

Restoration of Death Penalty

55.2

54.75

24.43

9.95

0.23

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

It will lessen criminality

The criminals should bepunished

It renders justice to thevictim

It can improve the justicesystem

Others

If yes, why? multiple response (n=442)

6.06

36.36

23.03

47.88

0.610

10

20

30

40

50

60

It will not lessencriminality

It is immoral It is against human rights The innocent may bewrongly executed

Others

Restoration of death penalty:If no, why? Multiple response (n=165)

78.7

57.3

35.9

44.4

41.3

36.7

0.2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

availability of work

availability of food

absence of poverty

peace

opportunities for development

unity

others

Key elements of Common Good (multiple response)

25.71

72.54

1.27 0.480

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

extremelyhappy

moderatelyhappy

not totallyhappy

not happy atall

At this point in your life, how happy are you?

6.14

15.35

70.92

7.11

4.2

2.1

2.42

6.46

27.95

13.41

8.89

5.17

0.81

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Religion

Financial stability

Relationship with Family

Relationship with Partner

Relationship with Friends

Relationship with co-workers

Relationship with community

Relationship with God

Health and wellness

Security

Sense of selfworth

With work

Position at work

Others

Reasons for happiness multiple response (n=619)

4.132.38

18.25

21.75

17.78

35.71

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1 2 3 4 5 6

If you are to rate extent to which you are committed to the teachings and practices of your own religion, what would be your self-rating?

(1= lowest, 6=highest)

1

1.3

1.7

4

5

87

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

I do NOT believe that there really is a God, and the matter is a settled onefor me.

I do NOT know whether or not there is a God, but I do NOT think there isany way to find out.

I do not beliecve in the existence of a personal God, but I do believe thereis a power of some kind.

I find myself believing in God's existence some of the time, but not at othertimes.

While I may have occasional doubts, I feel that I do believe that God reallydoes exist.

I believe that God really exist, and I have absolutely no doubts about it.

Which of the following statements comes closest to describing what you believe about God?

2.86

0.79

3.81

92.54

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

I do NOT believe in God now, and never have.

I do NOT believe in God now, but I used to in thepast.

I believe in God now, but I did NOT use to in thepast.

I believe in God now, and I always have.

Basic history of belief in God

44.76

37.62

9.21

4.13

2.54

0.3

0.16

0.32

0.32

0.16

0.48

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Very,very close to God

Fairly close to God

Adequately close to God

Somewhat close to God

Minimally close to God

Not at all close to God

I do not relate with God at all

I do not believe in God at all

Not applicable

Refused to answer

Don't know

If you were to consider your relationship with God, how close to God would you say you were?

3.973.17

17.94

24.29

19.68

30.95

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5 6

If you were to consider your own religiosity, how religious would you say you are as a whole?

(1=least, 6=greatest)

The City Wide Social Survey - Series 7With Funding Support from the

University Research Council (URC)and

Administered by theSocial Research Training and Development Office

Ateneo de Davao University

Thank You!

series 7 - university research...

Documents