sensor planarity study (pogress report) v. karimäki

14
March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 1 1 Sensor planarity study (pogress report) V. Karimäki Project meeting Helsinki 03.03.2009

Upload: yestin

Post on 05-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Project meeting Helsinki 03.03.2009. Sensor planarity study (pogress report) V. Karimäki. Recall the basic idea. Our CMSSW detector model: planar sensors (w=0). Q: track impact point at planar sensor P: true impact point at curved sensor near the true hit position - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 11

Sensor planarity study(pogress report)

V. Karimäki

Project meeting

Helsinki 03.03.2009

Page 2: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 21

Recall the basic idea

Q: track impact point at planar sensorP: true impact point at curved sensor near the true hit positionQ': point where our flat detector model assumes the hit lies

Departure from planarity causes a systematic offset:

u = (du/dw)*wP

du/dw=t1/t3 from track direction t = (t1,t2,t3)

Our CMSSW detector model: planar sensors (w=0)

Page 3: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 31

Hit correction for non-planarity

Corrected u-coordinate: uc = uh - u = uh - (t1/t3)*w [1]

So preserve the detector model, but

do correction

From [1]:

w=(t3/t1)* u

For fixed position (u,v):

w=<(t3/t1)*u> [2]

So systematics (u) in residuals give an estimate of w

i.e. the surface coordinates, computing [2] in bins

Page 4: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 41

Sensor curvature can be studied

1. Parametrizing shape: w=au2+buv+cv2 and fitting a,b,c

2. Model independent sensor shape by plotting mean residuals weighted with

(t3/t1) as a function of u,v

Page 5: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 51

Verification with Monte Carlo

Parameterized surface Fitted surface

Page 6: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 61

Model independent surface shape

By plotting weighted uncorrected mean residuals

Here MC

Page 7: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 71

Sensor shape study in cosmics

CRAFT data CMSSW TOB and TIB so far Begin with non-aligned data Pick up a few sample modules

Page 8: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 81

Residuals profile, uncorrected

v [cm]

Page 9: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 91

Residuals profile, corrected

v [cm]

Page 10: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 10

1

Residuals, uncorrected, a TOB mod

Page 11: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 11

1

Residual correction for non-planarity

Page 12: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 12

1

Corrected residual

Page 13: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 13

1

Sensor shape, example

Page 14: Sensor planarity study (pogress report)  V. Karimäki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 14

1

Summary

By simple Monte Carlo:Demonstrated method to fit sensor shapeMethod to correct hit positionsDemonstrated model independent way to

look for possible sensor curvatureCosmics: First studies using TOBNo significant effects so far Further studies with many more modules