sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: ladakh, nw himalaya daniel hobley...

8
Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai Grant Institute

Upload: britney-short

Post on 11-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh,

NW Himalaya

Daniel HobleySupervisors: Hugh Sinclair,

Patience Cowie, Tibor DunaiGrant Institute

Page 2: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

?

“Late Cenozoic uplift of mountain ranges and global climate change: chicken or egg?”

(Molnar & England, 1990)

• Disequilibrium alters process rates

• Timescales?

• Erosive mechanisms?

• Relative importance?

Page 3: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

Glacial rivers vs normal rivers• Enhanced erosion

• Enhanced discharge

• Reduced variability

• Temperature controlled

• Altered sediments

•…but with Jokulhlaups

• Signals transmitted

…we need to quantify these effects.

Page 4: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

Study area: Ladakh, NW Himalaya

• Restricted glacial area, variable down batholith

• Simple chronology

• Dry (Arctic desert)

• Constant forcings

• Limited human alteration

• Many comparable catchments

100km

Page 5: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

Approach1. GIS study

3200

3400

3600

3800

4000

4200

4400

4600

4800

5000

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000

Distance downstream / m

Ele

vati

on

/ m

Unglaciated catchment

Typical fluvial profile

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

5500

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

Distance downstream / m

Ele

vati

on

/ m

Glaciated catchment

Fluvial section

Major knickpoint

Increased concavity(elevated erosion

rates)

Slope plot

Max modern glacial extent

Approx extent of significant glacial alteration

DEMs used to obtain channel form, drainage area, slope data

Page 6: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

2. Fieldwork • Groundtruthing

• Measuring critical field parameters…

•…and how they vary downstream

• Cosmogenic samples

• Compare glaciated and unglaciated catchments

Sediment supplied

Channel morphometry

Sediment caliber

Channel width

Modern glacial behaviour

Nature of knickpoint & gorging

Page 7: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

(Crave & Davy 2001)

3. Modelling

• Can we mechanistically understand the response to the imposed disequilibrium?

• Shape vs hydrology

• Analytical models?

• Or numerical? (e.g., EROS)

• Non-“steady state” analysis required…

Page 8: Sensitivity of glacially-fed rivers to rapid climate change: Ladakh, NW Himalaya Daniel Hobley Supervisors: Hugh Sinclair, Patience Cowie, Tibor Dunai

Outstanding questions

Glaciers seem to increase downstream erosion, but…

• Fluvial (shape) vs glacial (hydrological) response?

• Distribution of erosion in time?• Lifetimes of various aspects of disequilibrium?• Can we scale up? (e.g., to Indus)• Understanding of transient responses of

systems?