sensitivity enhancement study of nanostructure-based localized...
TRANSCRIPT
Sensitivity Enhancement Study of
Nanostructure-Based Localized Surface Plasmon
Resonance Biosensor
Kyungjae Ma
The Graduate School
Yonsei University
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Sensitivity Enhancement Study of
Nanostructure-Based Localized Surface Plasmon
Resonance Biosensor
A Master’s Thesis
Submitted to the School of Electrical and Electronic
Engineering and the Graduate of Yonsei University
in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of
Master of Science
Kyungjae Ma
December 2009
감사의 글
졸업을 앞두고 연구실에서 보냈던 2년 여의 시간을 돌아보게 됩니다. 좋은 연구 결과를 얻기 위해 밤을 지샜던 날들은 분명 앞으로 내가 살아가며 이룰 결실들의 밑거름이 될 것이라 믿어 의심치 않습니다. 이제 본 학위 논문이 나오기
까지 많은 가르침과 깨달음을 주신 것에 감사 드리며 여러분들께 감사의 말씀을
드리고자 합니다.
먼저 본 연구를 수행하고 마무리 하는데 있어 아낌없는 지도와 격려를 해
주신 김동현 지도교수님께 감사를 드립니다. 항상 연구를 향한 열정과 늘 새로운
학문에 매진하시는 교수님의 모습을 본받아 졸업 후 어느 곳에 가더라도 이 사회
의 필요한 인재로 성장하도록 앞으로도 노력하겠습니다. 또한 제게 다른 한 분의
지도교수님과도 같으셨던 심은지 교수님께도 감사의 말씀을 드립니다. 특히 저의
학위 논문이 나오기까지 심사위원으로서 여러 가지 조언과 많은 도움을 주신 최
우영 교수님과 이용식 교수님께 감사의 말씀을 드립니다. 또한 2년의 연구 과정
동안 함께 할 수 있었던 물리학과 유경화 교수님, CUHK의 Aaron Ho-Pui Ho 교수
님, 전자과의 이명호 교수님, 의과대학 윤채옥 교수님께도 감사의 말씀을 드립니
다.
본 연구를 진행함에 있어 안 밖으로 많은 도움을 주셨던 우리 연구실 식
구 분들에게도 감사의 말씀을 전합니다. 연구실의 꽃 미남이자 맏형이신 세영 형,
다재 다능하신 신세대 애 아버지 규정 형, 연구실 동기지만 든든하고 배울 점 많
은 동준 형, 연구실 이슈 메이커인 호정 형, 인자한 미소를 가지고 계시지만 요
즘 들어 부쩍 공격력이 상승 중이신 영진 형, 연구실 내 자폭개그의 창시자 종률
군, 그리고 먼저 졸업하셔서 유학길에 올라 고군분투 중이신 순준 형. 이제 연구
실의 새 식구가 될 지유누나, 원주양에게도 감사의 말씀을 전합니다. 또한 즐거
운 시간을 함께한 계산화학 연구실의 희영 누나, 민우 형, 민철에게도 감사의 말
씀을 전합니다. 또한 학부시절 같이 벼락치기하며 날밤을 지샜던 친구들에게 감
사를 전합니다. 특히 결혼을 앞둔 창헌 형, 귀여운 창익 형, 본의 아니게 친구
먹게 되는 바람에 미안했던 재영 형, 춘구 형, 그리고 동갑내기이자 듬직한 혁이
군, 듬지 군, 원석 군에게도 감사를 전합니다.
언제나 날 믿어 주시고, 당신의 아들을 위해 지금껏 눈물로 기도하시며
뒤에서 힘이 되어 주시는 사랑하는 부모님, 그리고 올해 부푼 꿈을 안고 대학에
입학하는 내 동생 경은이에게 감사를 전합니다. 또한 말씀으로 늘 신앙의 버팀목
이 되어 주시는 담임목사님과 사랑하는 교회 식구들, 청년들, 특히 마음이 어렵
고 힘든 시기마다 극복할 수 있도록 기도해 주시고, 밥도 엄청 많이 사주신 (큰
사랑에 보답할 길이 없네요^^) 권성근 전도사님께 감사의 말씀을 드립니다.
마지막으로 오늘날의 내가 있게 해준 사랑하는 나의 조국 대한민국과 궁
극적 감사의 대상이요 앞으로도 나와 함께 하시며 내 꿈도 이루어 주실 지혜의
하나님께 감사와 영광을 돌립니다.
2010년 1월 마경재 올림
Table of contents
Table of contents ································································································ i
List of tables ···································································································· iii
List of figures··································································································· iv
Lists of Abbreviations ····················································································· vii
Abstract ·········································································································· viii
Chapter 1: Introduction ···················································································· 1
Chapter 2: Sensitivity enhancement study on nanostructure-based Localized
surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensor ························································ 3
2.1. Theoretical background ···································································· 3
2.1.1. Dispersion relation ································································ 3
2.1.2. Effective medium theory (EMT) ·········································· 4
2.1.3. Numerical analysis ································································ 5
2.2. LSPR detection analysis for phase sensitive configuration ·············· 6
2.3. Sensitivity characteristics of nanostructure-based LSPR sensor ······· 9
2.3.1. Randomly distributed silver islands structure ······················· 9
2.3.2. Periodic gold nanowire structure ········································ 14
Chapter 3: Experimental study on highly sensitive LSPR detection based on
target localization using periodic nanowire structure ····································· 22
3.1. Numerical modeling ······································································ 22
3.1.1. Sensor design ······································································ 22
3.1.2. Sensitivity enhancement factor ·········································· 24
3.2. Materials and methods ···································································· 24
3.2.1. Sensor fabrication······························································· 24
3.2.2. Optical setup ······································································ 25
3.2.3. DNA hybridization process ················································ 26
3.3. Result and discussion ······································································ 27
i
3.3.1. Numerical analysis ····························································· 27
3.3.2. Detection of DNA hybridization ········································ 33
3.3.3. Discussion············································································ 37
Chapter 4: Conclusion ····················································································· 39
References ······································································································· 41
국문요약 ·········································································································· 45
ii
List of tables Table 1. Maximal phase shift (upper row) and FWHM (bottom row) of the
scheme of conventional thin film and periodic nanowire based LSPR structure
regarding film thickness and structure period. (Unit: degree) ····························8
Table 2. SEFUTV for various gold film thicknesses. Theses parameters other
than dTF have been considered from the results presented in Figure .3-4·········30
iii
List of figures
Figure 2-1. Angular based phase shift at target RI change from 1.333 to 1.334
of (a) conventional scheme using gold thin film at thickness of 40 - 52 nm and
(b) LSPR scheme using periodic nanowire periods of 300-400nm. In addition
Its phase variation at the target RI change at maximal resonance condition of
(c) the conventional scheme at gold thin film and (d) the LSPR scheme.)····· ···7
Figure 2-2. SEM image of randomly distributed silver islands structure ·······10
Figure 2-3. The structure of Adenovirus; (1) penton capsomeres, (2) hexon
capsomeres, (3) viral genome (linear dsDNA)······· ··········································11
Figure 2-4. Magnetic field intensity profile at surface of silver islands based
plasmonic sensor································································································12
Figure 2-5. LSPR and conventional SPR detection as change of adenovirus
concentration·····································································································13
Figure 2-6. (a) Schematics with a target binding DNA layer model of LSPR
structure base on periodic nanowire and (b) Conventional thin film based SPR
structure·············································································································15
Figure 2-7. SEFUTV calculated for periodic nanowire structure for DNA
hybridization. The row and column corresponds to dNW = 10, 20 nm and Λ =
300, 400, 500 nm, respectively··········································································17
Figure 2-8. DNA hybridization far-field characteristics of angular based LSPR
using periodic nanowire and conventional SPR structure using thin film ·······19
Figure 2-9. Magnetic field intensity (|Hy|2) distribution at θSP of (a) LSPR and
(b) conventional SPR structure. (c) z axis cross field profiles on (a) and (b)· ·21
Figure 3-1. 3-D Schematic of a periodic nanowire LSPR sensor with design
parameters. The thick arrows represent the evaporation angle of SiO2·············23
iv
Figure 3-2. (a) An SEM image of the periodic nanowire sample after angled
evaporation. (b) A magnified SEM image of the sample confirms the existence
of the dielectric opening by angled evaporation. ··············································25
Figure 3-3. SPR system set-up (PO: polarizer, CH: chopper, M: mirror, PD:
photodiode, and PC: personal computer). ························································26
Figure 3-4. SEFUTV calculated for various designs of target-localized periodic
nanowire structure. x- and y-axis indicate evaporation angle θeva in degrees and
SEFUTV, respectively. The row corresponds to (dTF, dNW) = (40 nm, 10 nm), (40
nm, 20 nm), (45 nm, 10 nm), (45 nm, 20 nm), (50 nm, 10 nm), and (50 nm, 20
nm) from top to bottom. The columns represent dm = 1, 3, and 5 nm (from left
to right). Λ in nm and f in %.·············································································29
Figure 3-5. Magnetic field amplitude profiles (|Hy|) calculated for dsDNA: (a)
dTF = 40 nm, (b) 45 nm, and (c) 50 nm. Other parameters are same as those
listed in Table 2. The arrow indicates the incidence direction. (d) Horizontal
and (e) vertical magnetic field distribution show that increased radiation
damping decreases the near field for larger dTF and is associated with less
efficient sensitivity enhancement······································································31
Figure 3-6. Magnetic field amplitude distributions (|Hy|) calculated for the
optimum structure with parameters listed in Table 2 for dTF = 40 nm: from (a)
ssDNA to (b) dsDNA. The arrow indicates the light incidence. (c) Field
difference between the near-fields of (a) and (b), where the arrow indicates the
field difference at localized hotspots formed in the position of target dielectric
opening. ············································································································32
Figure 3-7. Measured reflectance for resonance characteristics of hybridization
process on the periodic nanowire and a thin film control ·································34
Figure 3-8. Real-time reflectance dynamics of DNA hybridization measured by
the periodic nanowire and the control sample, the incident angle was fixed at
v
θin = 60°.······································································································· ····34
Figure 3-9. DNA hybridization in the reverse incidental configuration, the
sample is mounted in the reverse orientation. Calculated near field profile of
(|Hy|): (a) ssDNA and (b) dsDNA, (c) Field difference between the near-fields
of (a) and (b), where the arrow indicates the field difference at localized
hotspots formed in the position of target dielectric opening. (d) Measured
reflectance based resonance characteristics.··················································· ··36
vi
List of Abbreviations
SP Surface Plasmon
SPR Surface Plasmon Resonance
RI Refractive Index
LSP Localized Surface Plasmon
LSPR Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance
EMT Effective Medium Theory
RCWA Rigorous Coupled Wave Analysis
FDTD Finite-Difference Time Domain
RIU Refractive Index Unit
FWHM Full With at Half Maximum
SEM Scanning Electron Microscopy
TIRF Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence
SEF Sensitivity Enhancement Factor
SEFUTV Sensitivity Enhancement Factor per Unit Target Volume
SAM Self-Assemble Monolayer
MCH 6-mercapto-1-hexanol
vii
Abstract
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is the optical phenomenon by
propagating electromagnetic field under specific incidental wave condition,
which has been used in molecular detection and imaging as biosensors. This
thesis aims to investigate highly sensitive localized SPR (LSPR) detection
using nanostructure. As a result, several enhancement factors were proved by
theoretical and experimental study including actual chip fabrication process.
In the theoretical analysis, rigorous coupled wave analysis and
finite-difference time-domain methods were employed to evaluate far and near
field characteristics as the LSPR biosensors. By using silver nanoislands based
LSPR, sensitivity improvement was induced by localized near fields. In this
study, actual fabricated islands chip was directly modeled from own SEM
image for the near field calculation. Here, relatively strong and tiny hotspots
were sparsely formed at the sensor surface, this hotspots were effective to
decade-nanoscale molecules detection. Actually, we could confirm
experimentally that the structure gives reasonable reflectance signal for lower
concentration of Adenovirus compared with conventional SPR detection. In
addition, the structure is expected to be used as noble imaging technique by
compensating blurring effect due to condensed fluorescence emission.
In nanowire based LSPR sensing, the scheme has merits of graphical
modeling using various numerical parameters to evaluate as well as to actual
fabricate. Far field analysis shows that the scheme with the optimum
parameters was 3 times more sensitive than conventional detection by thin
film based SPR. This result can be interpreted by broaden resonance angle
shifts accompanied with reflectance damping because of the localized surface
plasmon (LSP) propagation. These LSP modes were formed at both sides of
the nanowire ridge which formed as bimodal hotspots referred to the result of
near field analysis.
viii
Finally, experimental study for investigating highly sensitive LSPR
detection was conducted based on the enhancement issues by hotspots
excitation. Here, angled evaporation for dielectric mask layer was employed to
be exclusively raised the interaction event only at intended localized-areas
which overlap localized hotspots in the structure. By DNA hybridization
detection, sensitivity enhancement by resonance angular shift per unit target
volume was observed to be 64 times compared with conventional thin film
based SPR detection. In conclusion, the nanostructure-based LSPR detection
was excellent to characterize for sensitivity improvement of SPR biosensing,
and is expected to be used more enhanced detection method by additional
improvement using appropriate mask layer for target localization.
Keywords: Nanoplasmonics, Biosensor, Sensitivity enhancement,
Nanostructure, Target localization
ix
Chapter 1 Introduction
Surface plasmon (SP) is a longitudinal electromagnetic wave formed
between a dielectric and metal interface when TM wave is incident. Condition
of SP resonance (SPR) varies in response to molecular interactions which
occur on the metal surface. Due to the capability to detect by label-free as
refractive index (RI) changes, SPR has been used in well-known biosensing
technique. Basically, the dispersion relation between SP momentum and
energy can be postulated from Maxwell’s equations, which is given by
SPS0dm
dmSP sinθnk
εεεε
cωk =
+= , (1)
where θSP, εm, εm and ns are the incident angle at resonance condition, metal
permittivity, dielectric permittivity of target and RI of a dielectric prism
substrate. In Eq. (1), kSP is the SP wave vector and ω is angular frequency. c
and k0 are the speed of light and wave vector in free space. kSP and θSP in Eq.
(1) are required to be complex values as εm is complex. For gold or silver that
is typical metal used to excite SPs, |Re(εm)| >> |Im(εm)|, so that sinθ values of a
measured SPR condition can be approximated as [εmεd/(εm + εm)]1/2/ ns from Eq.
(1). It is the change of εd related in molecular interactions that one measures
using SPR.
Recently, intensive research have been made to enhance the sensitivity
limit of SPR: for example, by signal amplification using functionalized
nano-particles [1], magneto-optic methods [2], localized SPR (LSPR) based on
periodic various nanostructure [3,4,5,6,9,10,11,12,13,20,29,30] and detection
schemes of phase-sensitive SPR [7,8]. Especially, nanostructure-based LSPR,
typically, which is characterized by intensity measurement of periodic groove
patterns on the metallic film, improves the sensitivity by means of generating
1
partially distributed hotspots. It was also found that the sensitivity
enhancement relies on the molecular interaction [9] and can be acquired
additionally by localizing the target molecules in the hotspots [10].
This research contains theoretical background which describes
numerical analysis on LSPR detection based on metallic nanowire structure.
Then, we will consider sensitivity enhancement effect associated with
localized SP (LSP) based on randomly distributed silver nanoislands and
metallic nanowire structure.
The thesis’s goal is ultimately to investigate highly sensitive LSPR
detection system using numerical and experimental methods. For this reason,
it is important to consider the spatial distribution of localized near-fields on a
sensor surface and the target localization effect on the distributed field. This
research thus contains theoretical background which describes numerical
analysis on LSPR detection based on metallic nanowire structure. Then, we
will consider sensitivity enhancement effect associated with LSP based on
silver nanoislands and gold nanowire-structure. Then, for the experimental
study using periodic nanowire based LSPR detection, note that angled
evaporation process is additionally used in chip fabrication for target
localization. This research can be potentially important to taking advantage of
nanophotonic fields for biomolecular sensing and imaging.
2
Chapter 2 Sensitivity enhancement study on nanostructure based Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) sensor 2.1. Theoretical background 2.1.1. Dispersion relation An analytic solution does not exist in a closed form to describe
plasmonic phenomenon of electromagnetic fields in nanostructures.
Nevertheless, an alternative approach can be offered use of effective media
approximately. Dispersion relation for a surface mediated nanostructure can be
revised from Eq. (1) as [11,12,13]
SPS0effm
effmSP sinθnk
εεεε
cωk =
+= , (2)
In Eq. (2), εeff indicates the effective permittivity of the nanostructures.
kSP is significantly varied by the condition of a nanostructure, as it modulates
εeff in Eq. (2). It tends to take stronger momentum to establish plasmonic
oscillations in a surface mediated nanostructure. This suggests the SP
generation at shorter plasmon wavelength (λSP = 2π/kSP) and implies the
increased degree of field localization. In other words, an increased momentum
may functionalize as a sensitivity enhancement indicator. Especially, If
periodic nanowire at a smaller pitch and an extreme fill factor are used to
induce SPs, back-bending damping of plasmon momentum may be
significantly appeared [14]. This induces the decreased momentum at
resonance, although the configuration nature is complicated by the diverse
design parameters. Such a momentum variation is often accompanied by the
significant enhancement of plasmon fields-formation and sensitivity [4].
3
2.1.2. Effective medium theory (EMT) In this section, we describe periodic nanowire as an effective medium
related in the Rytov effective medium theory (EMT) for qualitative analysis
[15,16]. If the ambient medium including target area on the periodic nanowire
is approximated by εd, an overall effective medium that considers both sensing
target and nanowire may be given by
dmTEeff ff εεε )1()0(, −+= , (3)
dmTMeff
ffεεε−
+=11
)0(,
, (4)
22)0(,
3)0(,
222
)0(,
11)()1(3
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ Λ
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−+=
λεεεεπεε
dmTEeffTMeffTMeffeff ff (5)
with ε(0)eff,i and λ as the dielectric constant of effective medium at first order in
TE or TM polarization and wavelength of incident light, respectively.
While this approximation has been applied only when obtained
phenomenally and used in the Fresnel analysis [17,18], the EMT introduced in
Eqs. (3)-(5) refers to only qualitative viewpoint and has limitation of
completive analysis of the SPs excitation process in periodic nanowire,
because of the following reasons in [19]. First, the second-order EMT shown
in Eqs. (3)-(5) normally does not provide valid results which converge for
metallic nanowire. Second, the periodic nanowire and a metallic film layer are
so thin that entering wave can be directly coupled to outgoing wave. Moreover,
what an EMT does is only limited to homogenize the distributed field
produced by a periodic nanostructure to approximate the far field, in contrary
to the truth that evanescence waves are localized in the near-field. Therefore,
we have mainly used in numerical analysis by following analysis in next
section.
4
2.1.3. Numerical analysis The analysis was numerically calculated to investigate enhanced
sensitivity using rigorous coupled wave analysis (RCWA) and the
finite-difference time domain (FDTD). RCWA has been successfully
employed to presenting optical characteristics of various nanostructures. If the
ambient media are assumed to be linear in terms of the electromagnetic fields,
isotropic, time-invariant, homogeneous and source-free, Maxwell’s equations
are derived to a generalized by Helmholthz equation
0z)(x,Hnkz)(x,H y22
y2 =+∇ (6)
for TM polarized light. RI parameter, n = [ε(x,z) μ(x,z)]1/2. For a boundary
condition as pseudo-periodic, the Floquet-Bloch theorem is derived as follows: )sin(),(),( θi
yy ezxHzxH Λ+= (7)
for 0 < x < Λ and -∞ < z < ∞. Also, θ can be denoted as the incident angle. In
this event, the Rayleigh expansion holds as a solution of the near field:
)(),( zikxik
mmy
zmxmeAzxH +∞
−∞=∑= (8)
where Am may be the reflection or transmission coefficient in place. The z
dependence of the complex permittivity can be neglected for an infinitely long,
one-dimensional nanowire, thus, it is possible to have solution inside the
grooves as a Fourier expansion. The unknown values such as Am can be
determined based on the tangential-components continuity rule of the
electromagnetic fields at the boundaries between two media. For the
simulation in this study, spatial harmonics have been employed by 15-30.
5
2.2. LSPR detection analysis for phase sensitive configuration
Phase sensitive SPR detection is typical method for sensitivity
enhancement using a modified optical interferometric scheme. The system is
basis on detection to reflective differential phase-angles between TM and TE.
Here, TE is only used in a reference signal with respect to TM variation
because TE is not strongly varied for SPR condition. In the sensitivity aspects,
RI unit (RIU) by the order of 10-8 was reported [8], which refers a result by 10
times enhancement than conventional reflectance sensitive based SPR
detection. Note that RIU can be estimated by maximal RI detection
performance multiplied by sensing resolution.
Here, I want to brief phase sensitive effect of LSPR structure such as
periodic nanowire for a moment. We can carry out two sensitivity criterions to
compare sensing performance between structure of conventional SPR and
LSPR. The first is ∂φ/∂n that denoted differential phase shift for target RI
change, and the other is full with at half maximum (FWHM) of angular profile.
Former indicates that how phase shift are generated for target RI change, later
implies that how much angular margins that lead to reasonable sensing results
at least half phase shift.
6
Figure 2-1. Angular based phase shift at target RI change from 1.333 to 1.334 of (a) conventional scheme using gold thin film at thickness of 40 - 52 nm and (b) LSPR scheme using periodic nanowire periods of 300-400nm. In addition, Its phase variation at the target RI change at maximal resonance condition of (c) the conventional scheme at gold thin film and (d) the LSPR scheme.
7
Table 1. Maximal phase shift (upper row) and FWHM (bottom row) of the scheme of conventional thin film and periodic nanowire based LSPR structure regarding film thickness and structure period. (Unit: degree)
Conventional Period = 300nm Period = 400nm Period = 500nm
40 nm 6.2538 28.057 144.8507 63.7226
2.52 0.34 0.095 0.16
44 nm 12.7572 6.594 9.541 8.995
0.99 1.13 0.84 0.86
48 nm 162.0628 3.542 4.634 4.661
0.085 1.58 1.3 1.27
52 nm 13.12 2.283 2.896 2.998
0.56 1.85 1.58 1.53
Fig. 2-1 and Table 1 show numerical evaluation of phase sensitive
detection results. RCWA method was used in this simulation. Fig. 2-1 (a)
shows dramatic thickness dependence of a phase shift in the case of
conventional SPR. This result implies that each maximal phase shifts are
strongly dependant on the thin film thickness. In particular, appropriate
thickness was 48 nm. Fig. 2-1 (b) indicates each periodic nanowire case when
film thickness is 40 nm. Other cases of thickness are listed in Table 1. In this
result, 400 nm periodic nanowire shows is superior in the listed result, yet the
effect of that can’t exceed conventional performance. Figs. 2-1 (c) and (d)
show phase variation at target RI changes upon ambient condition using
conventional and periodic nanowire, respectively. Those are in the fixed
incident angle at resonance condition that indicates the maximal phase shift in
Figs. 2-1 (a) and (b). Here we can confirm a nonlinear variation tendency of
phase at fixed incident angle and ∂φ/∂n of each case is the largest at center of
RI change. In addition, Table 1 implies that FWHM is in inverse proportion to
the maximal phase shift, and an issue is that there is case that FWHM is less
8
than 0.1˚. Therefore, it is possible to causing a serious damage to the sensing
performance when the phase detection system employs a scheme which is
vulnerable to mechanical vibration or has sensing fluctuation range above 0.1˚.
Eventually, the phase sensing based LSPR structure could enhance
only in case the thin film thickness is equal to 40 nm. Therefore, use of
periodic nanowire structure is only rational to be applied when structure
conditions are specific and limited [20].
2.3. Sensitivity characteristics of nanostructure-based LSPR sensor In this section, sensitivity characteristics of LSPR sensors are
evaluated numerically using RCWA and FDTD methods. Formal is silver
islands structure that is used to randomly generate LSP mode. However, this
configuration had a limit of analysis using above evaluation methods since the
structure is formed randomly. In contrast, later, periodic gold nanowire
structure was properly adopted in this numerical analysis. For this reason,
feasible results were only presented about silver islands structure. Adenovirus
detection and DNA hybridization were assumed to biomolecular event for
characteristics analysis of silver islands and gold nanowire based LSPR
detection respectively.
2.3.1. Randomly distributed silver islands structure Randomly distributed silver islands structure generates stronger field
localization between each island than that of normally generated SP modes
from silver thin film. However, it is actually impossible that not only
numerical evaluation but also specific modeling due to random distribution of
islands. Therefore, surface near field profile was calculated using an actual
produced silver islands pattern.
9
The islands structure was fabricated simply by annealing process for a
little bit minutes. In detail, silver thin film upon SF10 slide glass was coated
by thermal evaporation. Then, the metal film heated using a hot plate at 175˚C
for 5min and cooled at room temperature. Fig. 2-2 shows scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) image of islands pattern by treating above process. A
shape of each island was round and embossing approximately, some got
tangled like chunks or preserved their shape. The average size and separation
was 100nm and 50nm, respectively.
Figure 2-2. SEM image of randomly distributed silver islands structure
10
We calculated surface near field distribution of the islands pattern
using FDTD methods. In actual, it is proper to exam characteristics of periodic
structure rather than the islands structure. Therefore, the calculation period
was assumed to enough large values to avoid useless coupling effect as
comparing a size of detection target, adenovirus.
Adenoviruses are composed of a nucleocapsid and a double-stranded
DNA genome, which are responsible for 5–10% of upper respiratory
infections, and many infections in adults as well as children. Typical size of
adenovirus is range of 80-90 nm, a basic structure is Fig. 2-3. The image was
obtained from [21].
Figure 2-3. The structure of Adenovirus; (1) penton capsomeres, (2) hexon capsomeres, (3) viral genome (linear dsDNA)
Fig. 2-4 shows the exited surface near field profile at 60 degree
incidental TM wave. A number of local hotspots are confirmed within range of
1.5um ×1.5um plane of pattern. Diameters of hotspots are less than 100nm,
approximately. These are formed by field localization from LSP coupling. In
particular, overall size of each hotspot was well matched to average size of
one adenovirus. It is implies that the hotspots are appropriate to identify
11
characteristics of individual adenovirus. In other word, this technique might be
possible to use toward to analysis the single molecule like adenovirus.
Especially, it enables us to improve resolution issue of total internal reflection
fluorescence (TIRF), etc. For example, TIRF microscopy adopted the islands
pattern can distinguish unit pixel from an image sensor more accurately and
brightly at localized hotspots areas to be compared with conventional TIRF
system since it generates only uniformly monotonous near field distribution.
Especially, labeled fluorescence dyes are significantly exited at localized
hotspot area, which can be effective to obtain enhanced resolution image.
However, the resolution enhancement is far from our overall subject related in
study on sensitivity characteristics of LSPR.
Figure 2-4. Magnetic field intensity profile at surface of silver islands based plasmonic sensor
12
Experimental result proved that the islands structure contributes to
sensitivity enhancement of LSPR detection. Fig. 2-5 shows the reflectance
variation as change adenovirus concentration at fixed incident angle. In this
figure, an error bar means detected reflectance fluctuation when incident angle
is varied in range of ± 1˚.
Figure 2-5. LSPR and conventional SPR detection as change of adenovirus concentration
The result implicates intuitively sensitivity enhancement effect and
detailed measurement method will be introduced in next chapter. In this figure,
two configurations were not able to detect low concentration less than 106
units/μl. Especially, in conventional, reflectance varied unclearly as increased
adenovirus concentration until 1010 units/μl. These values were fluctuated
within the scope of error. Then, extremely rapid reflectance jump was found to
13
concentration of 1011 units/μl. In contrast, in silver islands structure,
reflectance was increased constantly as increased adenovirus concentration
from 1011 units/μl. In addition, slope of conventional and islands pattern were
approximately 0.012 and 0.008, respectively, in the concentration range from
1010 to1011 units/μl. Thus, in the high concentration detection, conventional
would be more effective sensing tool because this reflectance difference was
larger as increased the virus concentration. However, island structure
guarantees low concentration range from 107 to1010 units/μl, it enhances by
thousand-fold compared with conventional structure. In this result, we can
induce that sensitivity enhancement effect was caused by interaction between
hotspot and adenovirus and there were equivalent size approximately.
Silver island structure based LSPR detection is beneficial to mass
production and industrialization since it can be made by relatively easy
procedure, annealing. However, this process is vulnerable of reproducibility.
In other word, this technique is not appropriate for LSPR detection due to a
significant issue with random condition.
2.3.2. Periodic gold nanowire structure We have confirmed briefly sensitivity characteristics using random
distributed silver islands based SPR detection. As a result, hotspots were
important factor related in reflectance based sensitivity enhancement. In this
section, we will deal with LSPR detection using periodic gold nanowire
structure since various enhancement factors as well hotspots issues can be
modeled and calculated by numerical methods mentioned above. For this
purpose, LSPR detection to measure DNA hybridization was modeled, which
was compared with conventional thin film based SPR detection. DNA
hybridization generally refers to a biology technique that measures the
14
polymerization between each complementary nucleotide. This process is help
to identify genetic characterization of bacteria, virus, and etc.
In the event, the hybridization process was assumed as changing
ssDNA to dsDNA abbreviated single and double strand of DNA, respectively.
Optical constants of ssDNA and dsDNA were referred and obtained from [22]
as n = 1.45 and 1.52. Ambient condition was assumed distillated water nature.
The thickness of DNA layer was assumed to be 8nm and uniformly conformed
on the sensor surface although the thickness might be actually fluctuated due
to hybridization process in liquid.
Figure 2-6. (a) Schematics with a target binding DNA layer model of LSPR structure base on periodic nanowire and (b) Conventional thin film based SPR structure
Figs. 2-6 (a) and (b) present a schematic configuration of a LSPR
using gold nanowire structure and conventional thin film based SPR structure.
The thickness of the gold (dTF) and gold nanowire (dNW) are assumed as 40-50
nm and 10-20 nm, respectively. Chromium layer was considered as addition
layer for adhesion between metal and prism. Optical constants of both metal
and prism are obtained from [23]. In addition, period (Λ) and fill factor (f) of
15
nanowire have also been considered as design parameters. In this scheme,
conjugated DNA layer was added on the sensor surface.
Here, the plasmonic sensitivity enhancement has been quantitatively
carried out by sensitivity enhancement factor (SEF) that is ratio of resonance
angle shift in terms of target binding on a LSPR sensing to that of a thin film
based conventional SPR sensing. SEF is defined as
[ ][ ]TF
NW
TF
NW
dsDNAssDNAdsDNAssDNA
SEF)()()()(
θθθθ
θθ
Δ−ΔΔ−Δ
=ΔΔ
= (9)
Δθ represents the resonance angle shift as a result of RI change from
ssDNA to dsDNA of DNA layer. This expression presents enhancement effect
for DNA hybridization process when we use the detection method of using
nanowire based LSPR compared with that of using thin film based SPR. The
notation is well known expression as reported research using periodic
nanowire structure [3,4,5,9,10,11,12,13,29,30]. SEF can be lower than 1,
which refers to negative effect of nanowire structure in terms of some special
cases.
In Figs. 2-6 (a) and (b), however, DNA layers are not identical
because of difference of sensor surface shape. This difference actually implies
that nanowire scheme can include much more DNA oligomers than
conventional SPR. Consequently, it is necessary to induce precisely a way to
compensate the difference of the sensing target volume for performance
analysis. Hence, we have newly employed an SEF per unit target volume
(SEFUTV), which is ratio of resonance angle shift per unit target of
cross-section of nanowire as the target volume. The SEFUTV is derived as
Λ+Λ
=ΛΔ
Λ+Δ=
NWTF
NWNWUTV d
SEFdSEF2/
)2/(θ
θ (10)
The SEFUTV maybe imply more reasonable analysis result than the SEF when
we consider near field effect which was dealt with previous section. Because
16
this notation is appropriate to quantify the sensitivity enhancement of LSPR
sensing associated with all of target tiny molecular sensing as well as DNA
binding event. In particular, target localization effect related in The SEFUTV
for various sensing position was reported using self-assembled monolayer
(SAM) [10]. The SEFUTV will be revised at next section based on newly
considered fabrication.
The nanowire structure was selected for simulation by inducing SEF
and SEFUTV with few design parameter (dTF, dNW, Λ and f). The parameters
were varied in range of dTF = 40-50 nm, dNW = 10-20 nm, Λ = 300-500 nm and
f = 50-70%. These parameters were referred with respect to actual fabrication
process.
Figure 2-7. SEFUTV calculated for periodic nanowire structure for DNA hybridization. The row and column corresponds to dNW = 10, 20 nm and Λ = 300, 400, 500 nm, respectively.
17
Fig. 2-7 shows the simulation results of various nanowire structures
for the various design parameters. First of all, we could confirm overall trends
of decrease SEFUTV with lager fill factor in terms of different dNW. In case of
dNW = 10nm, SEFUTV has a constant trend as increasing the fill factor. Instead,
SEFUTV tends to decrease slightly in near of 1.5 with lager Λ. However, thicker
dNW leads to dramatic SEFUTV variation in terms of fill factors compared with
thinner case. In particular, the structures with condition of Figs. 2-7 (d) and (e)
have not only maximum values at f = 50% among total result but also negative
values at f = 70%, negative effect corresponds to sensitivity degradation or
back bending effect. The optimum SEFUTV that was numerically described was
3.12 with design parameters of dTF = 45 nm, dNW = 20 nm, Λ = 400 nm and f =
50 %.
In the hybridization process, angular based far-filed characteristics of
LSPR applied the optimum parameters are compared with that of conventional
SPR as shown Fig. 2-8. In this figure, each change from solid to dashed line
implies reflectance variation due to the hybridization form ssDNA to dsDNA.
In Fig. 2-8, LSPR structure leads to broadening and increased reflectance
variation at resonance angle (θSP) compared with conventional SPR structure.
θSP of LSPR structure was larger than that of conventional SPR structure. This
far-field analysis is obvious to investigate shift of ΔθSP which corresponds to
sensing signals.
18
Figure 2-8. DNA hybridization far-field characteristics of angular based LSPR using periodic nanowire and conventional SPR structure using thin film
In addition to far-field analysis, we can concentrate on near-field
characterization. Fig. 2-9 presents the distribution of magnetic field intensity
(|Hy|2) of the near-field in the course of the DNA hybridization. Figs. 2-9 (a)
and (b) show the field formed by the optimum structure at θSP of incident (θSP
= 68.45˚ at nanowire and θSP = 60.58˚ at conventional structure) in medium.
Contrary to uniformly distributed in terms of conventional of Fig. 2-9 (b), the
fields were localized at both side of nanowire in Fig. 2-9 (a). Especially,
intensity of primary peak is larger than that of secondary peak; this position
depends on the incident direction. In addition, conventional SPR structure
leads to matching completely DNA layer to localized hotspots; however LSPR
structure enables only small hotspots to coincident side target DNA layer.
Despite this unfair condition, LSPR detection induced larger ΔθSP as change
19
from the hybridization process than conventional SPR detection. Here, larger
ΔθSP can be explained by target volume difference with LSPR and
conventional structure since larger volume makes more broaden ΔθSP.
However, it is not easy to explain the large SEFUTV of LSPR using only this
volume difference. Fig. 2-9 (c) proves that extraordinary amplified localized
fields contribute sensitivity enhancement of the far-field analysis with respect
to ΔθSP. As shown in Fig. 2-9 (c), z-cross profile at hotspot of LSPR structure
and normal penetration of conventional SPR are plotted. Both maximum fields
are located at near dNW = 45 nm. This obviously corresponds with sensitivity
enhancement related in randomly distributed amplified hotspot that was dealt
with chapter 2.3.1. However, in LSPR structure; field intensity is rapidly
decayed as increase z-axis compared to the conventional structure. In detail,
field intensity was decayed and halved at approximately 10 nm and 50nm
from the maximum point in case of LSPR and conventional SPR, respectively.
In other word, these results suggest that available target size for LSPR is
limited by rapid field decaying. However, this truth suggests that a LSPR
method might be more sensitive to detect tiny molecules less than the
limitation more than a conventional SPR scheme.
20
Figure 2-9. Magnetic field intensity (|Hy|2) distribution at θSP of (a) LSPR and (b) conventional SPR structure (c) z axis cross field profiles on (a) and (b)
21
Chapter 3 Experimental study on highly sensitive LSPR detection based on target localization using periodic nanowire structure It is necessary to match target localization area to hotspots for
investigating highly sensitive LSPR detection when we judged many results in
previous chapter. For this purpose, we will deal with DNA hybridization
detection using periodic nanowire structure with newly additional fabrication
for target localization. In addition, numerical enhancement results as various
sensor design parameter and experimental evaluations for optimum structure
are presented as following.
3.1. Numerical modeling 3.1.1. Sensor design We examine the feasible study for this approach experimentally, where
target molecular interactions was designed to occur only in the strongly
localized evanescent near field, i.e. hotspots. In particular, we modeled
localized target on a nanowire which has dealt with chapter 2.3 using angled
evaporation to add a SiO2 dielectric mask to obtain a small opening. Hence,
we attempted to make highly sensitive LSPR detection by coinciding localized
DNA area and hotspots excited by LSP. Note that adopting periodic nanowire
of matalodielectric double layers consisting of a dielectric opening that
separates each nanowire and a metallic thin film would enhance the sensitivity
of detection by manipulating an additional control over the coupling effect
between LSP modes and propagating SPs.
22
Figure 3-1. 3-D Schematic of a periodic nanowire LSPR sensor with design parameters, the thick arrows represent the evaporation angle of SiO2.
Fig. 3-1 represents a schematic diagram of the periodic nanowire
fabricated by angled evaporation. θeva indicates the evaporation angle.
Evaporated dielectric thickness is varies at side and top of nanowire in terms
of shot thickness of mask layer (dm) and θeva. It prevents non-specific binding
between thiolated probe ssDNA bare gold surface that is not modified by SiO2
[23]. Only the openings beside side of nanowire are opened to DNA
immobilization. Fig. 3-1 indicates the helixes in which immobilized and
hybridized DNAs. Other design parameters are same as chapter 2.
23
3.1.2. Sensitivity enhancement factor As mentioned, we have newly employed an SEFUTV. Because an SEF
can’t represent the amount of target molecules that is needed to achieve a
resonance shift, SEFUTV can be inevitably more appropriate to molecular
sensing. Note that for newly modified periodic gold nanowire structure,
SEFUTV may be approximated as an SEFUTV, i.e.,
evaTF
evaNWNWNWUTV SEF
ddSEF
θθθθ
tan1/)tan/(
+Λ
=ΛΔ
+Δ≈ ,
(11),
which explains the dependence of SEFUTV on various fabrication parameters.
3.2. Materials and methods 3.2.1. Sensor fabrication For fabrication of designed periodic nanowire structure, a gold film
(thickness: dTF = 40 nm) was basically evaporated on an SF10 substrate. Gold
was considered only as a metal for nano-plasmonic sensor due to the superior
biocompatibility. Periodic nanowire was then patterned by electron beam
lithography method with the optimum fabrication parameter. Then, SiO2 was
evaporated on the sample by angled-mounting by θeva = 30°. An SEM image
of the fabricated nanowire is shown in Fig. 3-2 (a). Approximately 11-nm
wide openings were created at left side of nanowire by the angled evaporation.
A magnified SEM image of the periodic nanowire sample in Fig. 3-2 (b)
confirms the opening to expose DNA hybridizations.
24
Figure 3-2. (a) An SEM image of the periodic nanowire sample after angled evaporation. (b) A magnified SEM image of the sample confirms the existence of the dielectric opening by angled evaporation.
3.2.2. Optical setup For experiment, a SPR instrument was set up, as shown in Fig. 3-3,
with dual motorized rotation stages (URS75PP, Newport, Irvine, CA). Light
source from a He-Ne laser (36 mW, λ = 632.8 nm, Melles-Griot, Carlsbad, CA)
is TM polarized coherent beam and incident on the chip from a SF10 prism.
Incident angle (θin) was scanned by a rotation stage, while a connected
photodiode (818-UV, Newport, Irvine, CA) was rotated by same θin of
opposite direction to measure the reflected light. The angular resolution of the
rotation stage was 0.0002°. The measured signal was taken by a lock-in
amplifier (Model SR830, Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA) to
compensate noise. The measurement procedure is controlled by LabView™
program (National Instruments, Austin, TX). Each measurement was taken 5
times and averaged. The resolution of the SPR sensor set-up is estimated to be
Δn ~ 2 x 10-6 in RIU.
25
Figure 3-3. SPR system set-up (PO: polarizer, CH: chopper, M: mirror, PD: photodiode, and PC: personal computer).
3.2.3. DNA hybridization process Complementary 24-mer length of sequence are following:
5΄thiolated-TTT TTT CGG TAT GCA TGC CAT GGC-3΄ and
complementary 5΄- GCC ATG GCA TGC ATA CCG AAA AAA-3΄ (Bioneer
Co., Daejeon, Korea), abbreviated as HS-ssDNA and C-ssDNA,
respectively.
DNA hybridization protocol are referred to [25,26] in detail. A
conventional thin film based chip and a periodic nanowire chip were used in
this experiment. Both samples were cleaned by sonication in acetone for 10
min and in 70% ethanol for another 10 min. Then, they were surface-treated
for attaching the gold surface to thiol compound at HS-ssDNA end using
plasma cleaner (Harrick Scientific Products, USA). In immobilization of
HS-ssDNA, the processed chips were dipped in 1.0-M KH2PO4 buffer mixed 2
μM HS-ssDNA at 4ºC for 5 hours. From this process, DNA immobilized chips
were treated in 1.0 mM 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (MCH) (Sigma-Aldrich) in
26
ethanol for 1 hour. Then, the chips were incubated in TE buffer (10 mM Tris
buffer (pH 7.6) and 1 mM EDTA) (Bioneer Co., Daejeon, Korea) at 65ºC.
Also, TE buffer mixed with 2 μM C-ssDNA and1 M NaCl solution was
conserved in water at 65ºC for hybridization experiments. In hybridization
process, the C-ssDNA solution was injected onto the DNA chip by a fluidic
system for 200 min using the syringe pump (KD Scientific Inc., Holliston,
MA). Pumping rate was at 10 μl/min. After hybridization, TE buffer was
injected to remove the DNA chip from the residue C-ssDNA particle in
medium. Because thiolated DNA has a tendency to immobilize onto gold
rather than to SiO2 and residue HS-ssDNA is washed out in TE buffer
injection process after immobilization, non-specific binding event of DNA to
SiO2 was neglected.
3.3. Result and discussion 3.3.1. Numerical analysis The periodic nanowire was selected for fabrication by calculating SEF
and SEFUTV with the design parameters (dTF, dNW, dm, Λ, and f). Especially,
parameters were varied in the range of dm = 1 to 5 nm, θeva = 30° to 60° and
the others were varied same range of chapter 2.
Fig. 3-4 represents a few inductions in a worth result. Moreover,
overall increased trends of SEFUTV with smaller θeva were critical. Target DNA
molecules can be better localized with smaller values of θeva, which affects
SEFUTV to increase. When effect of damping affects the SPs characteristics,
high f was predominant issues, for instance, in the case of dTF = 50 nm and
dNW = 20 nm, the overall trends were reversed. In many cases, damping gives
to broaden effect of the reflectance for θin so much, so that the structure can’t
be serving as a good SPR biosensor any more.
27
In Fig. 3-4, thicker dNW and dm were observed to increase SEFUTV,
because of amplified localized field, although the effect strongly depends on
the specific position of a nanowire. Also, a thinner gold film based nanowire
structure makes higher SEFUTV effect, as listed in Table 2. The preference of a
thinner gold film for higher SEFUTV is related to an increase of damping effect,
as the sensitivity enhancement is often correlated with strongly excited
damping effect. The increase factor of SEFUTV by a thin gold film only appears
to be independent of any other parameters, because the parameters other than
dTF do not affect the optimum film thickness. The optimum design parameter
and SEFUTV that was determined was 12.02 for dTF = 40 nm.by numerical
methods, which were listed in Table 2. Ten times of enhancement is very
important, because it is quite difficult challenges to attain significance
improvement in liquid medium due to reduced index contrast [9].
28
Figure 3-4. SEFUTV calculated for various designs of target-localized periodic nanowire structure. x- and y-axis indicate evaporation angle θeva in degrees and SEFUTV, respectively. The row corresponds to (dTF, dNW) = (40 nm, 10 nm), (40 nm, 20 nm), (45 nm, 10 nm), (45 nm, 20 nm), (50 nm, 10 nm), and (50 nm, 20 nm) from top to bottom. The columns represent dm = 1, 3, and 5 nm (from left to right). Λ in nm and f in %.
29
Table 2. SEFUTV for various gold film thicknesses. Theses parameters other than dTF have been considered from the results presented in Fig. 3-4
dTF dNW dm Λ f θeva SEFUTV
40 nm
20 nm 5 nm 400 nm 50% 30°
12.02
45 nm 11.55
50 nm 11.32
Figs. 3-5 (a)-(c) show the magnetic field distributions (|Hy|) for dTF =
40, 45, and 50 nm, whereas other parameters are same as listed in Table 2.
Figs. 3-5(d)-(e) provide horizontal and vertical field profile (|Hy|) which point
maximum values. In Fig. 3-5(d), the distribution shows typically a couple of
localized hotspots: a primary peak formed at the left-hand side which exists
opening and a secondary peak formed at the other side. The intensity ratio of
the primary to secondary peak was 2.27, 2.08, and 1.91 for dTF = 40, 45, and
50 nm, respectively. The intensity of primary peak was approximately 2 times
larger than that of secondary peak. In addition, the values were strongly
dependant on dTF variation. Therefore, the increased radiation damping related
in SP modes makes an negative effect of the near field amplification for larger
dTF, and is also associated with less efficient sensitivity enhancement.
In addition, note that the target openings induce effect of additional
field localization compared to a structure without the openings by complete
evaporation of SiO2. In terms of the primary peak field comparison, the
additional enhancement by the opening to be 8.5% compared to using a
complete SiO2 covered chip.
30
Figure 3-5. Magnetic field amplitude profiles (|Hy|) calculated for dsDNA: (a) dTF = 40 nm, (b) 45 nm, and (c) 50 nm. Other parameters are same as those listed in Table 2. The arrow indicates the incidence direction. (d) Horizontal and (e) vertical magnetic field distribution show that increased radiation damping decreases the near field for larger dTF and is associated with less efficient sensitivity enhancement.
Fig. 3-6 shows the distribution of magnetic field (|Hy|) in the near-field
in response to DNA hybridization process from ssDNA to dsDNA. Figs. 3-6 (a)
and (b) represent the fields distribution formed by the optimum structure (dTF
= 40 nm) at resonance angle of incidence (θin = 66.29° for ssDNA and 66.60°
for dsDNA) in TE buffer. Fields are localized in a small area of hotspots near
side of nanowire. The near-field variation induced by the DNA hybridization
can’t be appeared significant if Figs. 3-6(a) and (b) are feasibly compared.
Once ssDNA is hybridized to dsDNA, both the two peaks of field near
nanowire ridge slightly increase, whereas the hotspots are more localized in
the primary peak. In Fig. 3-6(c), it provides the numerical differences between
the near fields visualized in Figs. 3-6(a) and (b). The minute difference in the
fields can be induced as a significant change related in a molecular interaction,
31
since the interaction event occurs in the opening near primary peak that
roughly overlaps the hotspots area of large difference of magnetic field. This
implies that the lager field difference with smaller dTF, corresponds tendency
of SEFUTV presented in Fig. 3-4.
x [nm]
(a)
x [nm]
z [n
m]
(c)
z [n
m]
x [nm]
(b)
z [n
m]
Figure 3-6. Magnetic field amplitude distributions (|Hy|) calculated for the optimum structure with parameters listed in Table 2 for dTF = 40 nm: from (a) ssDNA to (b) dsDNA. The arrow indicates the light incidence. (c) Field difference between the near-fields of (a) and (b), where the arrow indicates the field difference at localized hotspots formed in the position of target dielectric opening.
32
3.3.2. Detection of DNA hybridization Fig. 3-7 shows the reflectance based resonance characteristics
measured by the fabricated periodic nanowire sample and a conventional thin
film control (dTF = 40 nm). Measured angle shifts were ΔθNW = 0.17° ± 0.05°
and ΔθTF = 0.05° ± 0.01°, i.e., SEF = 3.4 ± 2.1. In other words, angular
sensitivity has 3.4 times of enhancement factor. This implies to SEFUTV = 65 ±
40. This result confirms that the significant enhancement is induced by
localizing of target interactions at hotspots using periodic nanowire structure.
Note that the measured SEFUTV was larger than predicted SEFUTV mainly since
a larger ΔθNW and a smaller ΔθTF give a result of larger SEF than a numerical
result.
A smaller ΔθTF obtained experimentally might be related to the some
limited factors of the numerical modeling, for example, the model did not
consider the concentration of DNA layer and it dealt with DNA hybridization
only as the RIs variation. In addition, a larger ΔθNW can be interpreted partly a
cause of the angled evaporation process. The dielectric opening size might
have been narrower than designed due to angled evaporation nature. The
narrower opening may have an amplifying the hotspots even more expectation.
In addition, denser ssDNA molecules might have attached at smaller opening
for immobilization.
33
Figure 3-7. Measured reflectance for resonance characteristics of hybridization process on the periodic nanowire and a thin film control
Figure 3-8. Real-time reflectance dynamics of DNA hybridization measured by the periodic nanowire and the control sample, the incident angle was fixed at θin = 60°.
34
Real-time reflectance dynamics of DNA hybridization were detected
by measuring reflected light from the sample at θin = 60°, as shown in Fig. 3-8.
Hybridization kinetics was continually tracked to fulfill stabilized interactions
between each complementary ssDNA stands. A drop at 800 sec in the
reflectance was result of the injection of C-ssDNA solution of TE buffer
mixed NaCl. As the C-ssDNA injection was stopped at around 12,000 second
later, the reflectance jump was observed as normal TE buffer. The slope (S =
ΔR/Δt) of reflectance during DNA hybridization process was constant for both
control and periodic nanowire indicating a fixed state of an interaction and
provides information on the hybridization kinetics between C-ssDNA and
HS-ssDNA. Measured slope of reflectance increase is S = -5 pW/sec and -10
pW/sec for the periodic nanowire and control sample, respectively. In this
evaluation, S can’t be necessarily representative detection of the enhanced
sensitivity. S is actually smaller for the periodic nanowire sample, because its
reflectance based resonance characteristics are broader due to strong damping
effect and thus a smaller reflectance change is induced by an interaction in
spite of a larger θSP shift. Also, the measured reflectance has a higher than that
of a conventional thin film based control, which was detected higher
reflectance for a periodic nanowire sample as shown in Fig. 3-8.
35
Figure 3-9. DNA hybridization in the reverse incidental configuration, the sample is mounted in the reverse orientation. Calculated near field profile of (|Hy|): (a) ssDNA and (b) dsDNA, (c) Field difference between the near-fields of (a) and (b), where the arrow indicates the field difference at localized hotspots formed in the position of target dielectric opening. (d) Measured reflectance based resonance characteristics.
36
Other experiments were additionally conducted to evaluate reverse
configuration. In this event, the beam was incident from the reverse direction,
i.e., the incident angle was negative so that the secondary hotspot coincides
with DNA hybridization as shown in Fig. 3-9. Reflectance based resonance
characteristics were measured as an angular shift by Δθsn = 0.06° ± 0.05°. Note
that the data of control should be same as that of previous experiment for thin
film. Thus, a smaller SEF was obtained as SEF = 1.2 and SEFUTV should be 23
under numerical assumption, which is still significant because of the
secondary hotspot that exists where target is localized.
3.3.3. Discussion In this section, I want to concentrate on the implication of SEF in detail.
The LPSR detection has been related in the increase of detection volume and
the enhanced surface sensitivity due to the excitation of localized hotspots. In
this study, we conducted angled evaporation to make dramatically the
localized sensing space to overlap hot spots excitation area. The SEF was
numerically expectation value that presumes an evenly distributed molecular
interaction. In this respect, when calculating SEF, it was an indicator of the
amount of reaction molecules that participate in a binding to cause a unit
resonance angular shift and thus SEFUTV, i.e., the efficiency of angular shifts
per unit volume compared with conventional thin film based sensor
The detection criterion that expresses the sensitivity limitation of 1
ng/mm2 as 0.1º shifts eventually of the resonance angle from molecular
interaction on the sensing surface [27,28]. Based on the criterion, the number
of DNA molecules in case of the control experiment on the conventional SPR
detection can be estimated as 3.91 x 108 units assuming a beam for detection
area was collimated by forms 100 μm × 100 μm. Because the surface where
probe DNA helixes are immobilized on the opening of the ridge of nanowire
37
became smaller approximately by 7% compared to that on the conventional
thin film, it can be induced that 0.02 ng/mm2 results in 0.1º resonance angle
shift on the sensing surface matched localized hotspots of the periodic
nanowire.
Instead, assuming SPR detection system with performance of 1 pg/mm2,
the nanowire structure suggests roughly 20 fg/mm2 sensing efficiency, if
localized molecular interaction in the dielectric opening for subsequent SPR
measurement is presumed.
The cause for significant sensitivity enhancement reported in this thesis
can be mainly the hotspots from localized field. Due to the limitation of target
area, fewer binding event can be detected by an appreciable signal. Note that
practical applications without the localization of target have been improved by
two fold of sensitivity enhancement in numerical and experimental way
[9,29,30]. Another issue is that denser DNA may immobilized on the opening
compared with area of conventional thin film, since a relatively limited
adsorption at target opening results in staying a lasting number of DNA
molecules for binding event in liquefied nature throughout the process.
This result suggests that the detection by LSPR with target localization
doesn’t merit of revealing individual or interactions of molecules effectively
so far. Nevertheless, there is still a plenty of room by some improvement.
Assuming that target molecules of 0.1 pg/mm2 can be detectable and that this
study realize sensitivity enhancement by an order-of-magnitude increasing
using periodic nanowire including target localization, a very cautious estimate
would make the sensitivity limit achievable toward to 1 fg/mm2 in the near
future. In appropriate optical system with well-maintained related in issues
such as temperature and humidity, potentially 800 DNA molecules can be
detectable.
38
Chapter 4 Conclusion
The thesis aims to analysis the fundamental and sensitivity
characteristics of LSPR detection and to investigate high sensitive LSPR
scheme using nanostructure such as randomly distributed nanoislands and
periodic nanowire.
Silver nanoislands structure generates localized hotspots distributed
randomly on the structure since each island is randomly distributed on the film.
Nevertheless, this was effective tool as LSPR detection to detect tiny
molecules like adenovirus. However, the islands structure can’t be appropriate
LSPR detection methods due to the issues related in weak of reproducibility
and numerical modeling. Instead, the structure would be used to overcome
resolution failure including the blurring effect in fluorescence-based imaging
sensor because randomly localized-hotspots in islands could significantly
enhance fluorescence excitation.
In contrast, it is useful LSPR detection using periodic nanowire based
on practical fabrication. By using RCWA and FDTD method, optimum design
parameters were obtained as the modeling of DNA hybridization process. In
this event, we have confirmed strong relation with near-field and far-field to
induce amplified SPR detect signal. In other word, broader plasmon angular
shift could be detectable compared with conventional thin film based SPR
detection.
Based on above analysis, we have investigated the high sensitive LSPR
detection using periodic nanowire structures. Using numerical methods, we
modeled a nanowire structure in which event related in molecular interactions
are localized in hotspots by only LSPs modes. These results to optimize
nanowire structures proved that sensitivity enhancement by an order of
magnitude and it may be feasible on a per-unit-volume basis. Then, we used
39
angled evaporation to make target-localized periodic nanowire samples for
experimental way and employed DNA hybridization process as the target
interaction model to confirm the sensitivity enhancement. Eventually, the
measured data gave a proof that the LSPR detection scheme shows feasibility
of individual molecular detection for sensitivity enhancement.
40
References [1] L. He, M. D. Musick, S. R. Nicewarner, F. G. Salinas, S. J. Benkovic, M.
J. Natan, and C. D. Keating, “Colloidal Au-enhanced surface plasmon
resonance for ultrasensitive detection of DNA hybridization,” J. Am. Chem.
Soc., vol. 122, no. 38, pp. 9071-9077, Sep. 2000.
[2] B. Sepúlveda, A. Calle, L. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, “Highly sensitive
detection of biomolecules with the magneto-optic surface-plasmon-resonance
sensor,” Opt. Lett., vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1085-1087, Apr. 2006.
[3] K. Byun, S. Kim, and D. Kim, “Design study of highly sensitive
nanowire-enhanced surface plasmon resonance biosensors using rigorous
coupled wave analysis,” Opt. Express, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 3737-3742, May
2005.
[4] K. Kim, S. J. Yoon, and D. Kim, “Nanowire-based enhancement of
localized surface plasmon resonance for highly sensitive detection: a
theoretical study,” Opt. Express, vol. 14, no. 25, pp. 12419-12431, Dec. 2006.
[5] K. M. Byun, S. J. Yoon, D. Kim, and S. J. Kim, “Experimental study of
sensitivity enhancement in surface plasmon resonance biosensors by use of
periodic metallic nanowires,” Opt. Lett., vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1902-1904, Jul.
2007.
[6] L. Malic, B. Cui, T. Veres, and M. Tabrizian, “Enhanced surface plasmon
resonance imaging detection of DNA hybridization an periodic gold
nanoposts,” Opt. Lett., vol. 32, no. 21, pp. 3092-3094, Nov. 2007.
[7] H. P. Ho, W. C. Law, S. Y. Wu, C. Lin, and S. K. Kong, “Real-time optical
biosensor based on differential phase measurement of surface plasmon
resonance,” Biosens. Bioelectron., vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2177-2180, Apr. 2005.
[8] S. Y. Wu, H. P. Ho, W. C. Law, C. Lin, and S. K. Kong, “Highly sensitive
differential phase-sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on the
41
Mach-Zehnder configuration,” Opt. Lett., vol. 29, no. 20, pp. 2378-2380, Oct.
2004.
[9] S. J. Yoon and D. Kim, “Target dependence of the sensitivity in periodic
nanowire-based localized surface plasmon resonance biosensors,” J. Opt. Soc.
Am. A, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 725-735, Mar. 2008.
[10] K. M. Byun, S. M. Jang, S. J. Kim, and D. Kim, “Effect of target
localization on the sensitivity of a localized surface plasmon resonance
biosensor based on subwavelength metallic nanostructures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.
A, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1027-1034, Apr. 2009.
[11] D. Kim and S. J. Yoon, “Effective medium-based analysis of
nanowire-mediated localized surface plasmon resonance,” Appl. Opt., vol. 46,
no. 6, pp. 872-880, Feb. 2007.
[12] D. Kim, “Effect of resonant localized plasmon coupling on the sensitivity
enhancement of nanowire-based surface plasmon resonance biosensors,” J.
Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2307-2314, Sep. 2006.
[13] D. Kim, “Nanostructure-based localized surface plasmon resonance
biosensors,” in Optical Guided-Wave Chemical and Biosensors, Springer
Series on Chemical Sensors and Biosensors, vol. 7, M. Zourob and A.
Lakhtakia, Eds. New York: Springer, 2009, in press.
[14] J. Cesario, R. Quidant, G. Badenes, and S. Enoch, “Electromagnetic
coupling between a metal nanoparticle grating and a metallic surface,” Opt.
Lett., vol. 30, no. 24, pp. 3404-3406, Dec. 2005.
[15] S. M. Rytov, “Electromagnetic properties of a finely stratified medium,”
Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 466-475, May 1956.
[16] P. Lalanne and D. Lemercier-Lalanne, “On the effective medium theory of
subwavelength periodic structures,” J. Modern Opt., vol. 43, no. 10, pp.
2063-2085, Oct. 1996.
42
[17] G. T. Hermanson, Bioconjugate Techniques. London: Academic Press,
1996.
[18] S. Moon and D. Kim, “Fitting-based determination of an effective
medium of a metallic periodic structure and application to photonic crystals,” J.
Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 199-207, Jan. 2006.
[19] P. Lalanne and M. Hutley, “The optical properties of artificial media
structured at a subwavelength scale,” in Encyclopedia of Optical Engineering,
R. Driggers, Ed. Marcel Dekker: New York, 2003, pp. 62-71.
[20] K. Ma, D. J. Kim, and D. Kim, "Numerical evaluation of periodic
nanowire-based phase sensitive surface plasmon resonance detection," Current
Applied Physics, 9(4), Suppl. 1, e239-e242, July, 2009 (Nanobio-Seoul 2008
Special Issue).
[21] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenovirus
[22] S. Elhadj, G. Singh, and R. F. Saraf, “Optical properties of an
immobilized DNA monolayer from 255 to 700 nm,” Langmuir, vol. 20, no. 13,
pp. 5539-5543, Jun. 2004.
[23] E. D. Palik and G. Ghosh, Handbook of optical constants of solids.
Orlando; London: Academic Press, 1985.
[24] G. T. Hermanson, Bioconjugate Techniques. London: Academic Press,
1996.
[25] T. M. Herne and M. J. Tarlov, “Characterization of DNA probes
immobilized on gold surfaces,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 119, no. 38, pp.
8916-8920, Sep. 1997.
[26] A. W. Peterson, L. K. Wolf, and R. M. Georgiadis, “Hybridization of
mismatched or partially matched DNA at surfaces,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol.
124, no. 49, pp. 14601-14607, Dec. 2002.
[27] L. S. Jung, C. T. Campbell, T. M. Chinowsky, M. N. Mar, and S. S. Yee,
“Quantitative interpretation of the response of surface plasmon resonance
43
sensors to adsorbed films,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 5636-5648, Sep.
1998.
[28] D. K. Roper, “Determining surface plasmon resonance response factors
for deposition onto three-dimensional surfaces,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 62, no.
7, pp. 1988-1996, Apr. 2007.
[29] K. M. Byun, D. Kim, and S. J. Kim, “Investigation of the profile effect on
the sensitivity enhancement of nanowire-mediated localized surface plasmon
resonance biosensors,” Sens. Actuators B, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 401-407, Oct.
2006.
[30] K. M. Byun, S. J. Kim, and D. Kim, “Profile effect on the feasibility of
extinction-based localized surface plasmon resonance biosensors with metallic
nanowires,” Appl. Opt., vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 3382-3389, May 2006.
44
국문요약
국소 나노플라즈모닉 바이오센서의 광학적 특성 및
측정 감도 개선 연구
표면 플라즈몬 공명은 일정 광 입사 조건에서 금속 층에 전자적
표면진동파가 형성되는 현상으로, 일반적으로 극 미량 물질의 검출 및 이
미징을 위한 센서로서 이용되고 있다. 본 논문은 표면 플라즈몬 공명현상
을 이용한 국소나노플라즈모닉 센서의 측정 감도를 높이기 위해 진행되었
다. 이를 위해 이론적 접근을 비롯하여 실제 센서 제작 공정 및 실험을 통
해 그 효과를 입증하였다.
먼저 다음의 목적을 이론적으로 접근하기 위해 맥스웰 방정식에
기초한 엄 결합파동분석법 (Rigorous coupled wave analysis) 과 유한 요소
법 (Finite-difference time-domain)을 이용한 원거리 및 근거리 장의 반사광
특성 분석을 하였다. 이를 이용하여, 랜덤하게 분포하는 은 나노섬
(Nanoislands)구조의 경우 기판에 형성되는 국소 근거리장의 분포가 센서의
민감도 개선에 이용될 수 있음을 확인 할 수 있었다. 무질서 하게 분포하
는 패턴은 정해진 구조적 파라미터가 없기 때문에 반도체 공정으로 얻은
구조의 SEM 이미지를 토대로 직접 시각화 모델링 하였다. 센서의 근거리
장 분포를 분석한 결과, 센서의 표면 곳곳에 일부 강한 세기의 여기장 성
분 (Hotspots) 들이 형성 됨을 확인 할 수 있었다. 이러한 요인들은 기존의
단순박막구조와 비교해 볼 때 보다 작은 물질을 감지하는데 효과적이었으
며, 특히 실제 아데노바이러스 (Adenovirus) 측정을 통해 보다 저 농도의
물질을 감지할 수 있음이 확인 되었다. 또한 이미징 개선 측면에서 볼 때
에 이미지의 퍼짐현상 (Blurring)을 개선하기 때문에, 해상도 개선 효과를
기대 할 수 있다.
한편 나노선 구조의 경우 구조 자체의 주기적 성질와 제작의 용이
45
함으로 인해 다양한 공정 파라미터에 대한 민감도의 계산이 가능했다. 원
거리장 분석 결과 최대 3배 이상의 센서의 민감도 개선을 확인 할 수 있었
으며, 이것은 강한 국소 표면 플라즈몬 공명으로 인한 반사광의 감쇄 현상
과 공명각 변화 차이에 기인한다. 특히 근거리장 분석을 통해 나노선 양단
의 접합면 부근에 강한 국소 여기장이 형성되는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.
마지막으로 국소화된 여기장은 센서의 감도 향상에 영향을 미친다
는 이론적 결과를 토대로 고감도 측정을 위한 국소표면 플라즈몬 센서를
제작하였다. 특히, 강한 여기장이 발생하는 부분에만 선택적인 감지가 일어
나도록 금속 나노선에 기울임 증착을 통한 유전체 마스크층을 형성하였다.
이렇게 제작된 센서는 DNA 중합 반응 실험 결과 기존 대비 약 64배 이상
의 단위 접합면 당 공명 각 변화 감도 개선효과를 가져 왔다. 결과적으로
나노선 구조는 특성화 분석, 모델링 및 감도 개선 정량화에 유리하며 마스
크층을 이용한 추가적 감도 개선효과를 얻을 수 있음을 확인 할 수 있었
다.
핵심되는 말: 나노플라즈모닉, 바이오센서, 민감도 개선, 나노구조, 국소단
위측정
46