seminario geometry-qm-2
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Geometry of Quantization (II)
Phys. Rev.Lett. 105, 150606 (2010)E.G. and C.Pagani
Ennio GozziDept. of Physics
Theoretical SectionUniversity of TriesteStrada Costiera 11Miramare-Trieste
![Page 2: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MOTIVATIONS
● Superposition of states is one of the main feature of Quantum Mechanics (QM). It is at the heart of typical quantum mechanics effects like interpherence, entanglement etc.
● In Classical Mechanics (CM) instead we do not have superpositions and this creates all the troubles we encounter when we try to couple a quantum mechanical system with a classical one.
● In this work we shall try to understand what kills the superposition in Classical Mechanics.This will shed a new light not only on CM but also on QM.
![Page 3: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
● Path integral counterpart of the operatorial formalism mentioned above (CPI), which is different from the quantum one (QPI);
● Geometrical analysis of the space where the path integral formulation lives. Introduction of two Grassmann partners and to time t and of supervariables;
! !
-1-
Contents
● Koopman and von Neumann Hilbert Space formulation of classical mechanics (KvN) 1931;
● Local invariances;
● Observables;
Superposition principle in KvN?;●
● Solution of the problem.
![Page 4: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Classical Mechanics
(Review of Hamiltonian formalism)
● Hamiltonian: H(!)
● Poisson brackets: {A1(!), A2(!)}pb = "aA1#ab"bA2
● Probability density distribution in phase space:
microcanonical canonical
!("a, t) ! #[H " E]
!("a, t) ! exp["#H]
● Phase space: !a ! (q1 · · · qn; p1 · · · pn), a = 1, · · · , 2n
● Evolution of observables: dO
dt=
!O
!t+ {O,H}pb
● Equations of motion: !a = "ab#bH
● Evolution of probability density:d!
dt= 0 =! "!
"t= "{!,H}pb = !!a"#ab!bH
-2-
![Page 5: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Classical Mechanicsin Operatorial Form
Koopman, von Neumann (1931)
● !("a,!t) = !("a ! #ab$bH!t; 0)
Same functional form but different arguments.
!
● Propagator:
!(", t) =!
d"i K("; t|"i; ti)!("i, ti)
K(!f ; tf |!i; ti) = "[!f ! #cl(tf ;!i, ti)]
is a solution of Hamilton equations of motion.
!cl(t;"i, ti)
-3-
●(Liouvillian)L = i!aH"ab!b = i!qH!p ! i!pH!q
!"
!t= !{", H} = !aH#ab!b" " !iL"
![Page 6: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Koopman-von Neumann(KvN) Postulates
● As L is linear in the derivatives one can derive:
i!"
!t= L"
-4-
|!(")|2 = #(")
Probability density in the phase space.
3):
The evolution of ! is via the Liouvi llian L
i!"
!t= L" L = i!aH"ab!b = i!qH!p ! i!pH!q
4):
KvN introduced a Hilbert space made up of complex and square integrable functions on the phase space and imposed the following two postulates:
!(") ! L2
1)
2): [q, p] = 0
The observables? 5):
![Page 7: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Classical Dynamics
!Same equation !
i!
!t"(#, t) = L"(#, t)
i!
!t"(#, t) = L"(#, t)
is linear in the derivatives. L
Quantum Dynamics
i!
!t"(x, t) = H"(x, t)
Classical Dynamics
same equation!
!"#
"$
i!
!t"(q, p, t) = %H"(q, p, t)
i!
!t#(q, p, t) = %H#(q, p, t)
Why? %H is first order in !q and !p:
%H = !i!pH(q, p)!q + i!qH(q, p)!p
Quantum Dynamics
di!erent
equations
!"#
"$
i!
!t"(x, t) = %H"(x, t)
i!
!t#(x, t) = ! !
2mdiv("!$"" ! "$""!)
%H = ! !2
2m
!2
!x2+ V (x) is second order in !x
3
!Different Equations
H = ! h2
2m
!2
!x2+ V (x)Reason: is second order in !x
-5-
Why?
![Page 8: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Classical transition amplitude via path integral
As the evolution of the and the is the same, the propagator will be the same:
! !
K(!f ; tf |!i; ti) = "[!f ! #cl(tf ,!i)]
So in the continuum limit we get
K(!f ; tf |!i; ti) =! !f
!i
D!!!D"DcDc exp i
!dt "L
K(!f ; tf |!i; ti)
= limN!"
!"
#
N!1$
j=1
%d!j"[!j ! #cl(tj ,!i)]
&'
(!["f ! #cl(tf ,"i)]
!["j ! #cl(tj ,"i)] = !["a ! #ab$bH]tj
det[!ab "t ! "b(#ac"cH)]tj
!d!a ei!a["a!#ab$bH]
!dcadca e!ca[!a
b "t!"b(#ac"cH)]cb
!L = !a["a ! #ab$bH] + ica[%ab $t ! $b(#ac$cH)]cb
-6-
![Page 9: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Path Integral and Operatorial Formalism
●
Path Integral Classico
!a ! (q, p) variabili di spazio delle fasi
"acl(t;!i) cammino classico.
Risolve !a = #ab$bH(!)
Z ! "!f ; tf |!i; ti# =!D!!! %(!a$"a
cl(t;!i))
Proprieta delle delta di Dirac:
!("a ! #acl(t; "i)) = !("a ! $ab%bH) det(%t!
ac ! $ab%b%cH)
Esponenziazione:
Z =!D!!!D&DcDc exp i
! tf
ti
dt "L
"L = &a!a + icaca $H
H = &a#ab$bH + ica#ab$b$dHcd
4
Path Integral Classico
!a ! (q, p) variabili di spazio delle fasi
"acl(t;!i) cammino classico.
Risolve !a = #ab$bH(!)
Z ! "!f ; tf |!i; ti# =!D!!! %(!a$"a
cl(t;!i))
Proprieta delle delta di Dirac:
!("a ! #acl(t; "i)) = !("a ! $ab%bH) det(%t!
ac ! $ab%b%cH)
Esponenziazione:
Z =!D!!!D&DcDc exp i
! tf
ti
dt "L
"L = &a!a + icaca $H
H = &a#ab$bH + ica#ab$b$dHcd
4
where:
How can we turn into an operator?
Path Integral Classico
!a ! (q, p) variabili di spazio delle fasi
"acl(t;!i) cammino classico.
Risolve !a = #ab$bH(!)
Z ! "!f ; tf |!i; ti# =!D!!! %(!a$"a
cl(t;!i))
Proprieta delle delta di Dirac:
!("a ! #acl(t; "i)) = !("a ! $ab%bH) det(%t!
ac ! $ab%b%cH)
Esponenziazione:
Z =!D!!!D&DcDc exp i
! tf
ti
dt "L
"L = &a!a + icaca $H
H = &a#ab$bH + ica#ab$b$dHcd
4
● Commutators:![!a(t),"b(t)]" # lim
!!0!!a(t + #)"b(t) $ "b(t + #)!(t)"
With our the only non-zero!L = !a"a + icaca + · · ·commutators are:
![!a(t),"b(t)]" = i#ab , ![ca(t), cb(t)]" = #a
b
classical mechanics.![!a(t),!b(t)]" = 0In particular which confirms
that we are doing ●
-7-
!a !" !i"
"#aca !" !
!ca
A particular realization of the commutator above is:
and as multiplicative operators. !a, ca
●
![Page 10: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Path Integrals --> Operators
!a(t) !" !i"
"#a
(Liouville operator)H = !a"ab#bH !" H = !i"ab#bH#a = L
!
Path integral Operator formulation (Koopman-von ! Neumann 1931)
! !
! !f
!i
D!!!D" exp i
!dt "L !" exp!iHt = exp!iLt
Question: If the bosonic part of is related to the Liouville operator, what is the meaning
of the full ?
Path Integral Classico
!a ! (q, p) variabili di spazio delle fasi
"acl(t;!i) cammino classico.
Risolve !a = #ab$bH(!)
Z ! "!f ; tf |!i; ti# =!D!!! %(!a$"a
cl(t;!i))
Proprieta delle delta di Dirac:
!("a ! #acl(t; "i)) = !("a ! $ab%bH) det(%t!
ac ! $ab%b%cH)
Esponenziazione:
Z =!D!!!D&DcDc exp i
! tf
ti
dt "L
"L = &a!a + icaca $H
H = &a#ab$bH + ica#ab$b$dHcd
4
Path Integral Classico
!a ! (q, p) variabili di spazio delle fasi
"acl(t;!i) cammino classico.
Risolve !a = #ab$bH(!)
Z ! "!f ; tf |!i; ti# =!D!!! %(!a$"a
cl(t;!i))
Proprieta delle delta di Dirac:
!("a ! #acl(t; "i)) = !("a ! $ab%bH) det(%t!
ac ! $ab%b%cH)
Esponenziazione:
Z =!D!!!D&DcDc exp i
! tf
ti
dt "L
"L = &a!a + icaca $H
H = &a#ab$bH + ica#ab$b$dHcd
4
!L = !a["a ! #ab$bH] + ica[%ab $t ! $b(#ac$cH)]cb
-8-
![Page 11: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
c- variables and Jacobi fields
!L = !a["a ! #ab$bH] + ica[%ab $t ! $b(#ac$cH)]cb
generates the evolution of both the points of the phase space and their first variations.
Campi di Jacobi
!"a(t)
•
!"a(0)
•
!""#
""$
d
dt(!"a) = #ab$b$dH(!"d)! equazione di !"a
d
dtca = #ab$b$dHcd ! equazione di ca
ca " !"a
• H genera l’evoluzione sia dei punti dello spaziodelle fasi che delle loro prime variazioni.
• H: le sue proprieta spettrali forniscono informazionisulle poprieta dinamiche del sistema (ergodicita,caos, esponenti di Lyapunov).
14
ca(0) ca(t)
[Fig. 1]
1
!c(t)c(0)" # exp!t
Lyapunov exponents.
-9-
Equations of motion:
standard equations of ! motion for
!!
● Variation with respect to ! gives !a ! "ab#bH = 0
Variation with respect to ● c gives ca ! !ac"c"bHcb = 0
have the same evolution equation as the first variations of ca !a
Jacobi fields.
(!"a)! #ab$c$bH(!"c) = 0
![Page 12: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
c and differential forms
●
Forme Differenziali
Evoluzione temporale infinitesima!"#
"$
!a! = !a + "#ab$bH
ca! = ca + "#ab$b$dHcd =$!a!
$!bcb
ca si trasforma come una base per le forme ! ca " d!a
%(!, d!) = %0(!) + %a(!)d!a + %abd!a # d!b + . . .
$%(!, c) = %0(!) + %a(!)ca + %abcacb + . . .
%(!, c) e una forma di!erenziale
H%(!, c) = Lh%(!, d!)
Lh: derivata di Lie lungo il flusso hamiltoniano
(Cartan 1900).
13
Infinitesimal time evolution:
ca transform as a basis for forms;
T !!Mca = d!a ! basis of
ca · cb ! d!a " d!b
!
●forms on M
F (p) =1p!
Fa1...apd!a1 ! · · · ! d!ap "# F $ 1p!
Fa1...apca1 · · · cap
!" functions of and ! c
November 4, 2003 17:17 WSPC/139-IJMPA 01598
Cartan Calculus via Pauli Matrices 5233
where the Lagrangian is given by
L = !a"a + icaca !H , with H = !a#ab$bH + ica#ac$c$bHcb . (2.5)
From the Lagrangian (2.5) one can derive, besides the standard Hamilton’s equa-tions (2.1) for ", the following equations of motion for the Grassmann variables:
cb = #bc$c$aHca ,
˙cb = !ca#ac$c$bH .(2.6)
So infinitesimal transformations generated by H are given by
"a!= "a + %#ab$bH ,
ca!= ca + %#ac$c$bHcb =
$"a!
$"bcb ,
c!a = ca ! %cb#bc$c$aH =$"b
$"a! cb .
(2.7)
We notice from these equations that ca transforms, under the di!eomorphismgenerated by H, as a basis for the di!erential forms d"a, while ca transforms asa basis for the vector fields !
!"a , see Refs. 1 and 7. From the kinetic part of theLagrangian (2.5) we can derive, as Feynman did for quantum mechanics, the gradedcommutators of the theory. They are:
"["a, !b]"# = i&ab , "[cb, c
a]+# = &ab . (2.8)
All other commutators are zero. In order to satisfy the above commutators we canrealize "a and ca as multiplication operators and !a and ca as derivative ones:
!a = !i$
$"a, ca =
$
$ca. (2.9)
Substituting the previous relations into the Hamiltonian H of Eq. (2.5) we obtainthe following operator (from now on we will omit the hat signs ! on the symbols ofthe abstract operators. Instead we will use them on the symbols which indicate thematrices associated to these operators):
H = !i#ab$bH$a ! i#ac$c$bHcb $
$ca. (2.10)
The first term of (2.10) is just the Liouville operator that appears in the operatorialformulation of classical mechanics due to Koopman and von Neumann.2,3 Thisconfirms that (2.4) is just the correct functional counterpart of the operatorialformulation for classical mechanics. Moreover, thanks to the presence of Grassmannvariables, the CPI provides also the evolution of more generalized objects.1 In factthe following kernel:
K("f , cf , tf |"i, ci, ti) ="
D!!"D!D!!cDc exp#
i
" tf
ti
dtL$
(2.11)
●transform as a basis for vector fieldsca
●antisymmetric tensors
V (p) =1p!
V a1...ap!a1 ! · · · ! !ap "# V $ 1p!
V a1...ap ca1 · · · cap
!" functions of and ! c-10-
![Page 13: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Global symmetries
Dynamical Symmetries(they depend on )
Simmetrie e Geometria del CPI (1)
!L = !a"a + icaca ! !a#ab$bH ! ica#ad$d$bHcb
!H = !a#ab$bH + ica#ad$d$bHcb
Trasformata di Legendre
Esistono alcune simmetrie globali e universali di !H i cuigeneratori sono i seguenti:
Simmetrie puramente
Geometriche
(Non dipendono da H("))
Algebra Isp(2)
"########$
########%
QBRS = ica!a
QBRS = ica#ab!b
K = 12#abcacb
K = 12#abcacb
Qgh = caca
Simmetrie Dinamiche
(Dipendono da H("))
"######$
######%
NH = ca$aH(")
NH = ca#ab$bH(")
QH = QBRS ! NH
QH = QBRS + NH
& '( )
Algebra N = 2 SUSY [QH , QH ] = 2i !H
4
[QH , QH ] = 2iHalgebra N=2 susy:
Simmetrie e Geometria del CPI (1)
!L = !a"a + icaca ! !a#ab$bH ! ica#ad$d$bHcb
!H = !a#ab$bH + ica#ad$d$bHcb
Trasformata di Legendre
Esistono alcune simmetrie globali e universali di !H i cuigeneratori sono i seguenti:
Simmetrie puramente
Geometriche
(Non dipendono da H("))
Algebra Isp(2)
"########$
########%
QBRS = ica!a
QBRS = ica#ab!b
K = 12#abcacb
K = 12#abcacb
Qgh = caca
Simmetrie Dinamiche
(Dipendono da H("))
"######$
######%
NH = ca$aH(")
NH = ca#ab$bH(")
QH = QBRS !NH
QH = QBRS + NH
& '( )
Algebra N = 2 SUSY [QH , QH ] = 2i !H
4
(conserved charges for any system)Universal Symmetries
K =12!abc
acb; K =12!abcacb
QBRS ! ica!a; QBRS ! ica"ab!b; Qg ! caca
Square roots of the Hamiltonian:
Q2(1) = Q2
(2) = !iH
If we apply twice the transformations generated by we get a time translation.
Q(i)
Q(1) ! QBRS " NH , Q(2) ! QBRS + NH
-11-
![Page 14: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
CARTAN CALCULUS
!"Differential Geometry Operations
Path Integral Corrispondent
!"dF (p) [QBRS, F (p)]exterior derivative
!"!V F (p)[V , F (p)]
interior contraction
!" HLie derivative
Lh = d!h + !hd
!" [QBRS,H] = 0[d,Lh] = 0
!"equivariant exterior ! derivative
Q(1)deq = d ! !h
-12-
![Page 15: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Way Out ?.● !
OBSERVABLESin KvN theory
● KvN did not specify which are the observables in their formulation
In standard classical mechanics the observables are only:
●
So all the observables commutes and there is no interpherence effects.
!O(!)
● If the observables were hermitian operators but functions also of , ,
then they would not commute and interpherence effects would appear
because superposition is admitted in KvN
! c c
!O(!,", c, c)
-13-
![Page 16: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Superspace and Superfields
superspacet!
!
t !" (t, !, !)!
●(!, c, c,") target space
Superfield :!a(t, !, !) = "a(t) + !ca(t) + !#abcb(t) + i!!#ab$b(t)
!
base spacet●
-14-
![Page 17: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Confronto Tra Path Integral
Ampiezza di transizione classica:
!!qf ; tf |!q
i ; ti" =!
D!!!qD!p exp i
!idtd!d! L[!]
Ampiezza di transizione quantistica:
!qf ; tf |qi; ti" =!
D!!qDp expi
!
!dtL["]
Il path integral classico ha la stessa Lagrangiana e lastessa misura del path integral quantistico con i super-campi al posto dei campi e il supertempo al posto deltempo.
8
Quantum transition amplitude (QPI):
Confronto Tra Path Integral
Ampiezza di transizione classica:
!!qf ; tf |!q
i ; ti" =!
D!!!qD!p exp i
!idtd!d! L[!]
Ampiezza di transizione quantistica:
!qf ; tf |qi; ti" =!
D!!qDp expi
!
!dtL["]
Il path integral classico ha la stessa Lagrangiana e lastessa misura del path integral quantistico con i super-campi al posto dei campi e il supertempo al posto deltempo.
8
Classical transition amplitude (CPI) :
Comparison ofPath Integrals
The classical path integral has the same Lagrangian and the same measure as the quantum path integral but with the fields replaced by the superfields and the time integration replaced by the supertime integration.
-15-
![Page 18: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Local universal symmetries
●!
!a ! !a + "(t)#$abcbcb ! cb " "(t)cb
!!a ! !a + "(t)#ca
ca ! ca " "(t)ca
!!a ! !a + i"(t)##$ab%b
%a ! %a " "(t)$ab!b
● The only quantity invariant under all three transformations above is .
So is invariant and the transformations turn out to be local
symmetries of our systems
!a!
L[!]d!d!
-16-
● As they are like gauge transformations,the only admissible observables are
the following ones:
which are gauge invariant.O(!a)
![Page 19: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Heisenberg picture for and! !
● Let us go from the Heisenberg picture in , to the
Schroedinger one ! !
● e!!QBRS!QBRS !!!a(t, !, !)e!QBRS+QBRS ! = !"a(t)
● So is the Heisenberg picture,in ( , ), of
!!a(t, !, !)
!! !!a(t)
● Let us then turn the physical observables into the
Schroedinger picture form:e!!QBRS!!QBRS !OH(!a)e!Q
BRS+!QBRS
! OS = O(!a)
!O(!a)
● We get in this way the standard observables of CM!O(!a)
-17-
![Page 20: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Super-selection rule
● We have an operator which commutes with all the observables and which is not a multiple of the
identity.
!!a
!O(!!a)
● This triggers a superselection mechanism which says that the
Hilbert space of the system is given by the eigenvariety of the superselection
operator :!!
!!a|!a0! = !a
0 |!a0!
● Another eigenvariety will be:!!a|!a
1! = !a1 |!a
1!
-18-
![Page 21: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
No-superposition in CM
● As and belongs to different Hilbert spaces we cannot superimpose
them:
|!a1!|!a
0!
|!!a! " |!a0!+ |!a
1!
|!!a! is not a physical state.
● Not all hermitian operator are observables . The non-observables
ones are all those hermitian operators which connects different superselected
sectors.Example: the Liouvillian operator:
which moves from one point to another.!L = !a"
ab#bH
-19-
![Page 22: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Schoredinger picture in , of the KvN
waves! !
● Besides the obsevables we have to bring also the KvN-waves in the Schoeredinger picture in , !!
!!S(t, ", ") = e!QBRS+QBRS !!(t) =
= !(#a + "ca + "$abcb, c)
● Note that commutes with all the observables so the system lives also in the eigenvariety:
ca
ca|ca0! = ca0 |ca0!
● The physical states are then:! = !"|"a
0"!c|ca0" == #("# "0)#(c# c0)
-20-
![Page 23: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Schroedinger picture
● Is !! = "(#! #0)"(c! c0)
!!S = !("a + #ca + #$abcb, ca)
of the form?
● The only manner to achieve that is to put so:c = c = 0
!!S = "(#! #0)"(c)
and this is isomorphic to:!!S = "(#! #0)
which are the physical states.
-21-
![Page 24: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
● If we had neglected the differential forms in the KvN procedure, we would have had only functions of the , . These would make up non- commuting observables and there would be no way to get rid of them via some principle but only via a postulate:
restrict the to the
!! !!O(!!, !")
O(!!, !") !O("!)
Role of , cc
● The , instead allow us to go to the superfield and have a gauge invariance which automatically selects the correct observables.
c c
-22-
![Page 25: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Quantization and superposition
● In this framework quantization is achieved by sending (identical to “geometric quantization”).
!, ! ! 0
● The “gauge invariace” disappears if : !, ! ! 0!
!a ! !a + "(t)#ca
ca ! ca " "(t)ca
● Having no gauge invariace the superselection mechanism is not triggered anymore and we can have superposition.
-23-
![Page 26: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Physical Meaning of the Superfield
● We would like to get CM in the CPI formulation by starting from the path integral of QM and performing a “block spin” transformation to “block spin” of phase space of size ? >> h
●points in
phase spaceblock spin in phase space
QPI CPI
● We already passed from the QPI to the CPI via:
!a !a
so maybe the represent the block spin: !a
!a(!, c, . . .) = c = side
= center of the block spin !
![Page 27: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
If the new basic variables in CM are the blocks of phase space, then we can reparametrize its internal points as we
like provided the block remain the same.
Crucial Physical Freedom that we have
![Page 28: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The local-transformation on the components of the superfields that we have
used for the superselection rule are, “maybe”, the above Internal Point
Reparametrization
![Page 29: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
RENORMALIZATION GROUP APPROACH
Can we find an “analog” of the Gamma-function of the Callan-Symanzik renormalization group equation and its associated zeros ?
We proved that the Lagrangians in the QPI and the CPI are the same, except for the exchange field-superfield, it means there is only a field “renormalization” and not a coupling and mass renormalization. This is typical of supersymmetric field theory .
![Page 30: seminario geometry-qm-2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062906/58735c121a28abf9608c30eb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)