semiconductor revolution in the 20th century zhores alferov st petersburg academic university —...
TRANSCRIPT
Semiconductor Revolution in the 20th Century
Zhores AlferovZhores Alferov
St Petersburg Academic University — Nanotechnology Research and Education Centre RAS
2
• Introduction
• Semiconductor research in 1930th
• Transistor discovery
• Discovery of laser–maser principle and birth of quantum optoelectronics
• Invention and development of the silicon chips
• Heterostructure research“God-made” and “Man-made” crystals
• Problems and future trends
3
Polytechnical Institute
Ioffe seminar at the Polytechnical Institute. 1916
4
Yakov Frenkel
5
One of the last Ioffe photo. September 1960
6
Schematic plot of the first point-contact transistor
Laboratory demo model Laboratory demo model of the first bipolar transistorof the first bipolar transistor
7
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1956The Nobel Prize in Physics 1956
"for their researches on semiconductors and their discovery of the transistor effect"
William Bradford
Shockley1910–1989
John
Bardeen1908–1991
Walter Houser
Brattain1902–1987
8
9
10
11
12W. Shockley and A. Ioffe. Prague. 1960.
1313
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1964The Nobel Prize in Physics 1964
"for fundamental work in the field of quantum electronics,
which has led to the construction of oscillators and amplifiers based on the maser-laser principle"
Charles Hard
Townes b. 1915
Nicolay
Basov 1922–2001
Aleksandr
Prokhorov 1916–2002
1414
1515
1616
• January 1962: observations of superlumenscences in GaAs p-n junctions (Ioffe Institute, USSR).
• Sept.-Dec. 1962: laser action in GaAs and GaAsP p-n junctions (General Electric , IBM (USA); Lebedev Institute (USSR).
Condition of optical gain: EnF – Ep
F > Eg
Lasers andLasers and LEDsLEDs onon pp––n junctionsn junctions
Wavelength
Ligh
t int
ensi
ty
“+”
“–”C leaved m irror
p
nG aAs
EnF
EpF
E gL
pD
LnD
h
1717
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2000The Nobel Prize in Physics 2000"for basic work on information and communication technology"
Zhores I.Alferov
b. 1930
Herbert Kroemer
b. 1928
Jack S. Kilby
1923–2005
“for his part in the invention of the integrated circuit”
“for developing semiconductor heterostructures used in high-speed- and opto-electronics”
18
19
20
First integrated circuit/notebook
21
Patent of the first Patent of the first integrated circuit integrated circuit by R. Noyceby R. Noyce
22
(a) Factory sales of Electronics in the United States over the past 50 years and projected to 1990.
(b) Integrated circuit Market in the United States. 22
Factory sales of Electronics and IC Factory sales of Electronics and IC
(a) Factory sa les of E lectronics
Sales in the United S tates
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990Year
(b) In tegratedcircu its
D ig ita l M O S
D igita lb ipo larL inear
Inventionof transistor
Beginning of IC
Sal
es (
$ bi
llion
s)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
S.M. Sze, J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 22 (1983)
2323
Changing composition of work force Changing composition of work force in the United Statesin the United States
S.M. Sze, J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 22 (1983)
1860 1900 1950 1990Year
50
40
30
20
10
0
Period I Period II Period III
Agriculture
IndustryInformation
ServicePer
cent
age
2424
Penetration of technology into Penetration of technology into the industrial output the industrial output
1860 1900 1950 1990Year
Pen
etra
tion
of t
ech
nolo
gy
Electrom echanicaldesign
System organizationsoftware design
Electroniccircuitdesign
Logicdesign
Penetration of technology into the industrial output versus year for four periods of change in the United States electronics industry.
S.M. Sze, J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 22 (1983)
25251900 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
10 nm8
10 nm7
10 nm6
10 nm5
10 nm4
10 nm3
100 nm10 nm
Vacuum tube The first active e lectronic device to be invented w as the vacuum tube
First silicon transistor Texas Instrum ents in troduced the first
s ilicon transistor n 1954
The first Integrated circuit Jack K ilby developed the first in tegrated circu it in 1958
Size m atters Transistors in the first m icroprocessor (the In te l 4004) m easured 10 µm
Sm all talk The transistors in In te l's Pentium 4 processor are just 45 nm in s ize
Trade-offSm aller devices suffer from larger leakage currents
How low can you go? Further dow nsizing m ay not prove to be econom ically v iab le
Moore's law I: device downsizingMoore's law I: device downsizing
H. Iwai, H. Wang, Phys. World Vol. 18, 09 2005
2626
Moore's law II: chip densityMoore's law II: chip density
1970 1980 1990 2000 2004 2010 2020
104
105
106
107
108
109
1010
Gordon Moore C o-founder of In te l, w ho identified the trend for ch ip density 40 years ago
First m icroprocessor The Inte l 4004 conta ined 2300 transistors
Intel Pentium The first Pentium processor conta ined 5.5 m illion transistors
Intel Pentium 4 By 1995 the Pentium
chip conta ined42 m illion transistors
Intel Itanium The w orld 's m ost pow erfu l ch ip can perform hundreds of m illions of operations per second
The road ahead Further increase in chip density re lies on new technologies
Larger m em ory M em ory ch ips conta in m ore transistors than processors
H. Iwai, H. Wang, Phys. World Vol. 18, 09 2005
2727
1
10
100
1000
Feature size (µm )
Chi
p m
axim
um p
ower
den
sity
(W/c
m)2
1.5 1 0.7 0.5 0.35 0.25 0.18 0.13 0.1 0.07
H eating p latesurprassed( )
Itanium: 130 W
Pentium 4: 75 WPentium III: 35 W
Pentium II: 35 WPentium Pro: 30 W
Pentium: 14 W
I486: 2 W
I386: 1 W
Increase in the power density of VLSI chipsIncrease in the power density of VLSI chips
B. Jalali et. all., OPN, June 2009
28
Fundamental physical phenomena Fundamental physical phenomena inin classical heterostructuresclassical heterostructures
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fn
E c
E v
E c
Fp
Electrons
H oles
Fn E c
E v
Fp
Electrons
H oles
Electrons
One-side InjectionPropozal — 1948 (W. Shokley)
Experiment — 1965 (Zh. Alferov et al.)
SuperinjectionTheory — 1966 (Zh. Alferov et al.)
Experiment — 1968 (Zh. Alferov et al.)
Diffusion in built-in quasielectric fieldTheory — 1956 (H. Kroemer)
Experiment — 1967 (Zh. Alferov et al.)
29
(d)
(e)E c
E v
Fn
E c
E v
Fp
Electron and optical confinementPropozal — 1963 (Zh. Alferov et al.)
Experiment — 1968 (Zh. Alferov et al.)
Superlattices and quantum wellsTheory — 1962 (L.V. Keldysh)
First experiment —1970 (L. Esaki et al.)
Resonant tunnelling — 1963 (L.V. Iogansen)
In Quantum Wells — 1974 (L. Esaki et al.)
Fundamental physical phenomena Fundamental physical phenomena inin classical heterostructuresclassical heterostructures
30
Lattice matched heterojunctions
• Ge–GaAs–1959 (R. L. Anderson)
• AlGaAs–1967 (Zh. Alferov et al., J. M. Woodall & H. S. Rupprecht)
• Quaternary HS (InGaAsP & AlGaAsSb)Proposal–1970 (Zh. Alferov et al.)First experiment–1972 (Antipas et al.)
Heterojunctions — a new kindHeterojunctions — a new kindof semiconductor materials:of semiconductor materials:
5.40 5.56 5.72 5.88 6.04 6.20Lattice constant ( ) [300 K ]Å
Ene
rgy
gap
(eV
) [3
00 K
]
2 .8
2.0
1.2
0.4
A lP
G aP
G aAs
G e
InP
A lSb
G aSb
InAs
Long journey from infinite interface recombination to ideal heterojunction
31
Energy gaps vs lattice constants for semiconductors IV elements, III–V and II(IV)–VI compounds and magnetic materials in parentheses. Lines connecting the semiconductors, red for III–V, and blue for others,
indicate quantum heterostructures, that have been investigated.Nitrides have not been yet included.
5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6
Ene
rgy
gap
(eV
)
3 .0
2.4
1.8
1.2
0.6
0
–0.6
Lattice constant ( )Å
32
Schematic representation of the DHS injection laser in the first CW-operation
at room temperature
250 µm
120
µm
200 m A
Copper
M etal
M etal
S iO 2
p A l G a As 3 µm0.25 0.75
p A l G a As 3 µm0.25 0.75
p G aAs 0.5 µm
p G aAs 3 µm+
n G aAs
33
Space station “Mir” equipped with heterostructure solar cells
Heterostructure solar cellsHeterostructure solar cells
34
Heterostructure microelectronicsHeterostructure microelectronicsHeterojunction Bipolar Transistor
NAlGaAs-n GaAs Heterojunction
Suggestion—1948 (W.Shockley)Theory—1957 (H.Kroemer)Experiment—1972 (Zh.Alferov et al.)AlGaAs HBT
HEMT—1980 (T.Mimura et al.)
Speed-power performances
J–J
100 nW 1 µW 10 µW 100 µW 1 m W 10 m W
10 ns
1 ns
100 ps
10 ps
Pro
paga
tion
dela
y
Pow er d issipation
E c
E v
E c
E v
F
F
E c
E v
E cE 1
E 0
E v
35
(by I. Hayashi, 1985)Heterostructure TreeHeterostructure Tree
HighPow er
E lectronics
LD
LED
APDPIN
DetectorA rray
FET
HEM THBT
G aAsIC
HSSolarCell's
PhasedArray
LD
M ulti-Wavelength
LDPIN-FETLD-Driver
O ne C hipRepeater
M onolith icO EIC
Sw itch O pticalConnection
Betw eenLSIs
O pticalW iringInside
LSISSI
MSI
LSIIntegrationof O ptica l
and E lectronicDevices
Integrationof O ptica lDevices
Integration ofB ifunctional
Devices
W ide BandO ptical Transition
Wavelength D ivisionM ultip lexity
A ll O ptica l L ink
Laser D iskLaser Printer
O ptica l Sensor
Advanced LAN
BidirectionalVideo Netw ork Super H igh Speed
Com puter
O ne C hipCom puter
IntegrationTechnology
Device Technology
ProcessTechnology
SubstrateCrystal
EpitaxiThin Film
MaterialCharacterization
36
Liquid Phase Epitaxy of III–V compounds
5 nm
InAsGaP thin layer inInGaP/InGaAsP/InGaP/GaAs (111 A) structure with quantum well grown by LPE. TEM image of the structure.
H 2Heater coils
Pull rod
SolutionG aAs
sourceG aAs
substrate
Q uartz reactor
37
e-gun
ion gauge
ion pum p
R H EEDscreen
shutters
effusioncells
substrateunit
residual gasanalyzer
Schematic view of MBE machine
Riber 32P
MESFET, HEMT
QCL, RTD, Esaki-Tsu SL
PD, LED, LD
....
MBE — high purity of materials, in situ control, precision of structure growth in layer thickness and composition
Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)III–V compounds
38
Schematic view of MOCVD chamber
Inlet
StreamlinesWaffer
Quartz sealing
Unique method of wafer rotation leads to high uniformity of structure in wafer and high reproducibility from wafer to wafer
Al O 2 3
HEMT LED LD
MOCVD — high purity of materials, large-scale device-oriented technology
Aixtron AIX2000 HT (up to 6 x 2” wafers) Production oriented growth machine for the fabrication of device structures
Epiquip VP50-RP(up to 1 x 2” wafer)Flexible growth machine for laboratory studies
MOCVD growth of III–V compounds
39
Impact of dimensionality ondensity of states
Lz
Lx
Lz
3D
0D
1D
2D
Ly
LzLx
E gap
E 00 E 01
E 0 E 1
E 000 E 001
Den
sity
of s
tate
sP
N
P
N
P
N
P
N
Energy
40
Band diagram Layer sequence
Emission spectrum at room temperature
Light- and Volt-current characteristics
Pulsedroom tem perature
8.5 8.6 8.7W avelength, µm
Opt
ical
pow
er (
log.
, a.u
.)
1
0.1
0.01
0.001
8K
150K
200K
250K
C urrent, A
Pow
er, m
W
Vol
tage
, V
12
0
4
8
80
60
40
20
00 0.5 1.0 1.5
Quantum cascade lasers
41
Quantum dot as superatom
Atom Semiconductor Quantum dot
photon
kT
photon
valenceband
conductionband
phonon
forb idden gaps
electronlevels
holelevels
42
• Evolution and revolutionary changes
• Reduction of dimensionality results in improvements
Milestones of semiconductor lasers
4.3 kA /cm(1968)
2
900 A /cm(1970)
2
160 A /cm(1981)
2
40 A /cm(1988)
2
6 A /cm(2002)
2
19 A /cm(2000)
2
Impact of SPSL QW
105
104
103
102
10
01960 00 200565 70 75 80 85 90 95
Years
J th
2 (
A/c
m)
Impact of DoubleHeterostructures
Impact of Quantum Wells
Impact of Quantum
Dots
4343
““Magic leather” Magic leather” energy consumptionenergy consumption
200 000
150 000
1 000 000
90 000
1 440 000
15 000 000
Energy Carrier
Tota l throughout the w orld
Reserves(know n andextractive)
(G Watt year)
Consumptionrate
(G Watt)
Period ofexhaust
(years)
Oil
Gas
Coal
Nuclear Power(therm al reactors)
Tota l
Nuclear Power(fast reactors)
4 600
2 200
3 000
750*
11 000
11 000*
40–50
60–70
300–400
120
130
1 500
*C alculated value
4444
Multijunction solar cells provide conversion of the solar spectrum with higher efficiency. Achievable efficiency of multijunction cells is > 50%
SiGaInP GaAs
Ge
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 0500 1000 1500 2000 2500 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Wavelength (nm ) Wavelength (nm )
Spe
ctra
l irr
adia
nce
(W/m
µm
)2
4545
The experimental PV installation with output power of 1 kW based on concentrator III-V solar cells and Fresnel lens panels arranged on the sun-tracker (development of the Ioffe Institute). The efficiency >30% can be ensured by such a type of installations if they are equipped by tandem solar cells with efficiency >35%.
4646
White light-emitting diodes:White light-emitting diodes:efficiency, controllability, reliability, life time
Today:Today:InGaN-QW/GaN/sapphirelight-emitting chip + YAG Ce phosphor
Outlook:Outlook:Monolithic microcavity LED with InGN/GN MQW active region
+ simple design
– phosphor loss+ monolithic nature
+ absence of additional loss
W hitePhosphor YAG C e
Sapphire
Buffer
n+G aN
InG aN -Q W
p+G aN
Ti/Ag/AuN i/Ag/Au
W hite
Sapphire
Buffer
n+G aN
Ti/Ag/Au
InG aN-Q W
p+G aN
Ni/Ag/AuBragg resonator G aN/A lG aN
4747
Nanostructures for high power Nanostructures for high power semiconductor laserssemiconductor lasers
Laser array output power > 100 WMatrix output power > 5 kW
Laser efficiency > 75%
Laser power > 10 W
5 nm
Band gap, eV
Thi
ckne
ss, n
m
Solid-state lasers pum ping
Atm ospheric and fibre optical
com munication
Navigation
Energy transport in the atm osphere
and fibre
Welding and cutting
Atm ospheric lidars
Medical apparatus
Fibre lasers
4848
Global nanotechnology market forecast:Global nanotechnology market forecast: More than 1 trillion USD annually in the nearest 8–10 years
Accelerants b illion100
N anom ateria ls b illion350
Transport b illion 70Ecology
b illion100
N anoelectronics b illion350
Pharm aceutics b illion180
4949
1. Heterostructures — a new kind of semiconductor materials:• expensive, complicated chemically & technologically but most efficient
2. Modern optoelectronics is based on heterostructure applications• DHS laser — key device of the modern optoelectronics
• HS PD — the most efficient & high speed photo diode
• OEIC — only solve problem of high information density of optical communication system
3. Future high speed microelectronics will mostly use heterostructures
4. High temperature, high speed power electronics — a new broad field of heterostructure applications
5. Heterostructures in solar energy conversion:
the most expensive photocells and the cheapest solar electricity producer
6. In the 21st century heterostructures in electronics will reserve only 1% for homojunctions
SummarySummary