semiconductor device: pn junctionmil.ee.nctu.edu.tw/course/semiconductor/review_modern... · 2012....
TRANSCRIPT
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Semiconductor Device: PN Junction
Prof. Yu-Ting Cheng
Microsystems Integration Laboratory
Department of Electronics Engineering &
Institute of Electronics
National Chiao Tung Univesity
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Fermi Level of PN Junctions
In forward and reverse bias:
φbi → φbi −V
Space Charge
Region (SCR)
Quasi Neutral
Region (QNR)
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Thermal Equilibrium
2
0
0
00
ln
)0(
)0(ln
)()(
i
ADbi
xFcxFcsnspbi
n
NN
q
kTV
xn
xnkT
EEEEWWqV
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Carrier Profile in Thermal Equilibrium of
PN Junction
1-D Poisson’s Eq.:
Gauss Law:
E
VEV 2
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Electrostatic Potential (Build-in Potential)
V(x)
V(x)
V(x)
V(x)
1. Two unknowns: xn and xp.
:Overall charge neutrality: qNAxp = qNDxn
2. Potential difference across structure must be Vbi:
V(xn) - V(-xp) Vbi
Vbi Vbi
Vbi
Vbi
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
PN in Non-equilibrium State
I. Qualitatively, electrostatics unchanged out of equilibrium, but SCR widens
and shrinks, as needed:
Vbi Vbi+V
Vbi-V
V
V
V
V
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I-V Characteristics
In thermal equilibrium:
balance between electron and hole flows across
SCR
Balance between G and R in QNR’s
I =0
In forward bias:
energy barrier to minority carriers reduced
minority carrier injection
R>G in QNR’s
I ∼ eqV/kT
In reverse bias:
energy barrier to minority carriers increased
minority carrier extraction
G>R in QNR’s
I saturates to a small value
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Quasi Fermi Level
Review:
Let’s define:
Then
v
B
Fv
C
B
cF
E
v
Tk
EE
E
C
Tk
EE
dEEFEgpep
dEEFEgnen
))(1)((
)()(
00
00
v v
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Interested in energy band diagram representations of complex situations in
semiconductors outside thermal equilibrium.
In TE, Fermi level makes statement about energy distribution of carriers in bands
⇒ EF relates no with Nc and po with Nv:
Outside TE, EF cannot be used. Define two ”quasi-Fermi levels” such that:
Under Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics (n <<Nc, p<<Nv):
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
What Can we implement the concept of quasi-Fermi levels?
Take derivative of n = f(Efe) with respect to x:
Then, from
Similar
Gradient of quasi-Fermi level: unifying driving force for carrier flow.
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Quasi-Fermi levels: effective way to visualize carrier phenomena outside equilibrium
in energy band diagram.
Visualize carrier concentrations and net recombination
Visualize currents:
∇Efe =0 ⇒ Je =0
∇Efe 0 ⇒ Je 0
if n high, ∇Efe small to maintain a certain current level
if n low, ∇Efe large to maintain a certain current level
1. If Efe >Efh ⇒ np > ni 2⇒ U> 0
2. Efe <Efh ⇒ np < ni 2 ⇒ U< 0
3. If Efe = Efh ⇒ np = ni 2 ⇒ U = 0 (carrier conc’s in TE)
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Quasi-equilibrium: carrier distributions in energy never depart too far from TE in
times scales of practical interest.
Quasi-equilibrium appropriate if:
scattering time << dominant device time constant
⇒ carriers undergo many collisions and attain thermal quasi-equilibrium with the
lattice and among themselves very quickly.
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
In forward bias
Compute diode current density as follows:
J = Je(−xp)+Jh(xn)
Compute each minority carrier current contribution as follows:
Je(−xp)= −qn 0(−xp)ve(−xp)
Jh(xn)= qp0(xn)vh(xn)
Boundary conditions across SCR. In thermal equilibrium, Boltzmann relations:
If net current inside SCR is much smaller than drift and diffusion components, then
quasi-equilibrium⇒ Boltzmann relations apply:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-720j-integrated-microelectronic-devices-spring-2007/
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Quasi-Fermi levels across long diode:
•Inside SCR:
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
•In terms of excesses:
Boundary conditions have all expected features. For electrons (for example):
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Minority carrier velocity at edges of SCR (”long” diode: Wn �>> Lh,Wp �>>Le).
•Carrier velocities:
•Excess minority carrier currents:
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Total current: sum of electron and hole current:
Define Js ≡saturation current density (A/cm2):
If diode area is A, current is:
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Rectifying Behavior of a Diode
Rectifying behavior arises from boundary conditions across SCR:
In forward bias: carrier concentrations at SCR edges growup exponentially
In reverse bias: carrier concentrations at SCR edges reduced quickly to zero (can’t go
below!)
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Quasi-neutrality in QNR’s demands n’ p’ .Consequences:
In n-QNR,quasi-neutrality implies:
Also, if V ↑→ Qhn ↑→|Qen|↑ with:
ΔQhn supplied from p-contact, ΔQen
supplied from n-contact.
Looks like a capacitor ⇒ diffusion capacitance.
Minority Carrier Storage
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Diffusion capacitance(per unit area):
where
For a long diode
For a short diode: with τtn and τtp are the minority carrier transit times through QNR’s:
Similar result to long diode!
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Cd grows exponentially in forward bias, negligible in reverse bias:
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Series Resistance Effect
I. Accounts for ohmic drop in QNR’s
:Reduces internal diode voltage → I ↓
Higher VF required to deliver desired
IF →more power dissipation, potential
process control problems
RC time constant degraded.
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Second Order Effect:
Space-charge generation and recombination In real devices, non-ideal I −V characteristics often
Anomalies often due to:
*Recombination through traps in SCR (in forward bias)
*Generation through traps in SCR (in reverse bias)
Simple model for SCR generation and recombination:
Starting point: trap-assisted G/R rate equation:
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. In SCR:
II.SCR G/R current:
*Since n and p changing quickly with x in SCR, no analytical solution.
Since np constant, point of SCR with highest Utr where: τhon = τeop
Thus,
Use this across entire SCR upper limit to current:
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
High Voltage Effects in Diode
I. Forward Bias: High Injection Region
One of the assumption in the device model is that the injection of minority carriers was
at a fairly low level, so that essentially no voltage dropped across the bulk of the
structure. All the voltage was assumed to be dropping over the depletion region.
However, Iforward, the injection level the injected minority carrier density the
majority carrier density. At that time, an increasely larger fraction of the external
bias drops across the undepleted region. The diode current will then stop growing
exponentially with the applied voltage, but will tend to saturate and the whole diode
will behave like a conductor. (Thus, as the forward bias increase, the current is now
controlled by the resistance of the n- and p- type regions as well as the contact
resistance.
II. Reverse Bias: Punchthrough
As the reverse bias is increased, the diode current may abruptly run away with the
current being only limited by the external circuit. This phenomena called breakdown
may be due to any of three causes: Punchthrough, Impact Ionization and Zener
Breakdown.
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Cont. on Reverse Bias: Punchthrough
As the reverse bias is increased, the depletion region across which the potential
drops also increases. Consider a situation where we have, a heavily doped p-region
next to a lightly doped n-region. The n-side depletion region is then much larger than
that of the p-side. At sufficiently large voltage, the n-side depletion region will reach
the n-side ohmic contact. If the voltage is further increased, the contact will feel the
electric field penetration and will supply electrons to the p-n diode. The diode
essentially then suffers a short and the current is simply limited by the outside circuit
resistance. If Vrp is the punchthrough voltage, the current for Vr> Vrp is essentially
Where RL is the resistance in the circuit and includes the effect of the diode resistance.
L
rpr
R
VVI
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Zener Breakdown
http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/~schubert/Course-ECSE-2210-Microelectronics-Technology-2010/A-MT-Ch13-PN-junction-Reverse-bias.pdf
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Tunneling breakdown will occur in lightly doped pn junctions at sufficiently high
reverse voltages. Tunneling breakdown is called Zener breakdown. Such diodes are
called Zener diodes. Typical Zener voltages = 5 – 20 V
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
Impact Ionization
I. Physical basis: Impact ionization at high electric fields. Generation of electron-hole
pairs by impact ionization.
During impact ionization a rapidly propagating electrons hits the electron shell of an
atom and “kicks” an electron out of its orbit thereby ionizing the atom
The free carriers created this way will create further free carriers by impact ionization
carrier multiplication higher current
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. Avalanche breakdown is caused by impact ionization of electron-hole pairs. When
applying a high electric field, carriers gain kinetic energy and generate additional
electron-hole pairs through impact ionization. The ionization rate is quantified by the
ionization constants of electrons and holes, n and p. These ionization constants are
defined as the change of the carrier density with position divided by the carrier
density or:
The ionization causes a generation of additional electrons and holes. Assuming that the
ionization coefficients of electrons and holes are the same, the multiplication factor M,
can be calculated from:
ndxdn n
2
1
1
1x
x
dx
M
Avalanche breakdown
IEE5017, NCTU, 鄭裕庭
I. The integral is taken between x1 and x2, the region within the depletion layer where
the electric field is assumed constant and large enough to cause impact ionization.
Outside this range, the electric field is assumed to be too low to cause impact
ionization. The equation for the multiplication factor reaches infinity if the integral
equals one. This condition can be interpreted as follows: For each electron coming
to the high field at point x1 one additional electron-hole pair is generated arriving at
point x2. This hole drifts in the opposite direction and generates an additional
electron-hole pair at the starting point x1. One initial electron therefore yields an
infinite number of electrons arriving at x2, hence an infinite multiplication factor.
II.The multiplication factor is commonly expressed as a function of the applied voltage
and the breakdown voltage using the following empirical relation:
62 ,
1
1
n
V
VM
n
br
a