semi-supervised state space models

62
Semi-Supervised State Space Models

Upload: adolph

Post on 07-Jan-2016

55 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Semi-Supervised State Space Models. A Big Thanks To . Firdaus Janoos , OSU / Harvard,MIT /Exxon. Istavan ( Pisti ) Morocz , Harvard, MNI. Prof. Jason Bohland Quantitative Neuroscience Laboratory Boston University. Sources. http:// neufo.org / lecture_events. NIPS 2011. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Semi-Supervised State Space Models

Page 2: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

A Big Thanks To

Prof. Jason BohlandQuantitative Neuroscience LaboratoryBoston University

Istavan (Pisti) Morocz, Harvard, MNI

Firdaus Janoos, OSU/Harvard,MIT/Exxon

Page 3: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Sources

http://neufo.org/lecture_eventsNIPS 2011

Page 4: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

A Running Example

Page 5: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Difficulty in learning arithmetic that cannot be explained by mental retardation, inappropriate schooling, or poor social environment

Core conceptual deficit dealing with numbers

Very common : 3-6% of school-age children

Heterogeneous

Dyscalculia DyslexiaSelective inability to build a visual representation of a word, used in subsequent language processing, in the absence of general visual impairment or speech disorders

Affects 5-10% of the populationSpelling, phonological processing, word retrievalDisorder of the visual word form systemMultiple varietiesOccipital, temporal, frontal, cerebellum

Page 6: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Experimental protocolsEvent-related designs- single stimuli/“events” at any

time point- Periodic or spread across

frequencies- Require rapidly acquired

data(small TR)- Rapid events (less than ~20s

apart) give rise to temporal summation of BOLD response

- Summation is close to linear, but non-linearities are evident for small ISIs.

Stimulus function (s(t))

Page 7: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Mental Arithmetic Paradigm

Page 8: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Mental ArithmeticInvolves basic manipulation of number and

quantities

Magnitude based system – bilateral IPS

Verbal based system – left AG

Attentional system – ps Parietal Lobule

Other systems – SMA, primary visual cortex, liPFC, insula, etc

Page 9: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Cascadic Recruitment

Page 10: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Classical fMRI Pipeline

Page 11: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

State-of-the-Art - ROI

Janoos et al., EuroVis2009

Page 12: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Another Way ?

Page 13: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Multi-voxel pattern analysis

Traditional analyses focus has focused on relationship between task and individual brain voxels (or regions)

MVPA uses patterns of observed activation across sets of voxels to decode represented information– Relies on machine learning / pattern classification

algorithms– Claim: more sensitive detection of cognitive states (Mind

Reading)– Does not employ spatial smoothing– Typically conducted within individual subjects

http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/nikolaus.kriegeskorte/infonotacti.html

Inter-voxel differences contain information!

Page 14: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Brain States

Page 15: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Brain States

Page 16: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Inspiration

Page 17: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Haxby, 2001

Page 18: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Mitchell, 2008

Page 19: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Functional Networks

Page 20: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Functional / Effective Connectivity

Standard analysis of fMRI data conforms to a functional segregation approach to brain function

i.e. brain regions are active for a stimulus typeAssumes the inputs have access to all brain regions

Pertinent Question: How do active brain regions interact with one another? [ functional integration ]

Effective Connectivity = the functional strength of a specific anatomical connection during a particular cognitive task; i.e. the influence that one region has on another. ( Inferred )

Functional Connectivity = the temporal correlation between signal from two brain regions during a cognitive task ( Measured )[ But these are exceptionally fuzzy terms ]

Page 21: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

A Solution – State Space Models

Page 22: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Functional Distance ?

Zt1 Zt2

Zt3

Is Zt1 < Zt2 ,or Zt2 < Zt3 ,orSort Zt1, Zt2, Zt3

Page 23: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

State Space Model

Page 24: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Comprehensive Model

Page 25: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

State-Space Model

Janoos et al., MICCAI 2010

Page 26: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Computational Workflow

Page 27: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Feature Space Estimation

Page 28: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Functional Distance

Page 29: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Transportation Distance

Page 30: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Functional Distance

Zt – activation patternsf - transportation

Page 31: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Transportation Distance

Page 32: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Functional Connectivity Estimation

Gaussian smoothing

HAC until f ≈0.25N

Cluster-wise Correlation Estimation and Shrinkage

Voxel-wise Correlation Estimation

Page 33: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Clustering in Functional Space10

0s 4s 8s0s 4s 8s

Bra

in S

tate

Lab

el

5

0

10

5

0

Page 34: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

CritiqueNo neurophysiologic model

Point estimatesHemodynamic uncertainty Temporal structure

Functional distance - an optimization problemNo metric structureExpensive !

Page 35: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Embeddings

Page 36: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

A SolutionDistortion minimizing

Page 37: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Feature Space Φ

Orthogonal Bases Graph Partitioning

Normalized graph Laplacian of F

Page 38: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Working in Feature Space Φ

Page 39: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Feature SelectionY

Φ

Rtimes

Resampling with Replacement

Basis Vector φ(l,m) Computation

Bootstrap Distribution of Correlations ρ (l,m)

Feature SelectionRetain φ(l,m) if Pr[ρ (l,m) ≥ τΦ] ≥ 0.75

Functional Network Estimation

Page 40: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Model Size Selection

Strike balance between model complexity and model fit

Information theoretic or Bayesian criteriaNotion of model complexity

Cross-validationIID Assumption

Page 41: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Estimation

Page 42: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Chosen Method

Model Estimation

State Sequence Estimation

Φ Feature-Space Transformation

y

Until convergence

θ

Until convergence

s

K, λWError Rate

HyperparameterSelection

x

YfMRI Data

Feature-space basis

E-stepCompute q(n)(x,z) from p(y,z,x|θ(n))

M-stepEstimate θ(n+1) : L(q(n), θ(n+1)) > L(q(n), θ(n))

E-stepCompute q(n)(z) from p(z| y,x(n),θ)

M-stepx(n+1) = argmax L(q(n), x)

Stimulus Parameters

Hyperparameters

Page 43: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Premise - EM Algorithm

Page 44: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Generalized EM Algorithm

http://mplab.ucsd.edu/tutorials/EM.pdf

Page 45: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Mean Field Approximation

Page 46: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Experimental Conditions

Page 47: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Comprehensive Model

Page 48: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Comparisons

Page 49: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

HRFs

Page 50: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Optimal States

Page 51: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Spatial Maps

Page 52: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Population Studies (sort of)

Page 53: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Interpretation

Janoos et al., NeuroImage, 2011

Control Dyscalculic

Dyslexic

Page 54: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

MDS Plots

Page 55: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

MDS Plots

Control MaleControl Female

Dyslexic FemaleDyslexic Male

Dyscalculic MaleDyscalculic Female

Page 56: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Stage-wise Error Plots

Page 57: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 1: Product Size

Phase 2: Problem Difficulty

Stage-wise MDS Plots

Page 58: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

What Else ?

Page 59: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Maximally Predictive Criteria

Multiple spatio-temporal patterns in fMRINeurophysiological

task related vs. default networksExtraneous

Breathing, pulsatile, scanner driftSelect a model that is maximally

predictive with respect to taskPredictability of optimal state-

sequence from stimulus, s

Page 60: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

“Resting State”Rather than evoked responses, rs-fMRI looks at random, low-

frequency fluctuations of BOLD activity (Biswal, 1995) “industry standard” filters data at ~0.01 < f < 0.08 Hz

“Default mode” network (Raichle et al., 2001) Set of regions with correlated BOLD activity Activation decreases when subjects perform an explicit task Ventromedial PFC, precuneus, temporal-parietal junction…

But the default mode is only one network that emerges from the correlation structure of resting state networks

Smith et al (2009) showed various task-active networks emerge from ICA based interrogation of rs-fMRI data

Page 61: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Summary

Process model for fMRI Spatial patterns and the temporal structureIdentification of internal mental processes

Neurophysiologically plausibleTest for the effects of experimental

variablesParameter interpretation

Comparison of mental processesAbstract representation of patterns

Page 62: Semi-Supervised  State Space Models

Thank You for Putting Up with me for 9 Lectures