self appraisal report - sri satya sai university of …sssutms.co.in/uploaddocument/naac of sri...
TRANSCRIPT
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 1
SELF APPRAISAL REPORT
(SAR)
Submitted to
National Assessment and Accreditation Council
(NAAC)
Post Box No. 1075 Nagarbhavi -560072
By
SRI SATYA SAI INSTITUTE OF TEACHER EDUCATIONApproved by Department of Higher EducationAffiliated to Barkatullah University, Bhopal
Campus : SH-18 Bhopal-Indore Road, Pachama Sehore (M.P.)
Website: www.ssist.in, Email: [email protected]
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 2
SRI SATYA SAI INSTITUTE OF TEACHER EDUCATIONApproved by Department of Higher EducationAffiliated to Barkatullah University, Bhopal
Campus : SH-18 Bhopal-Indore Road, Pachama Sehore (M.P.)Website: www.ssist.in, Email: [email protected]
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 3
FROM CHAIRMAN’S DESK
Dear Students,
I am pleased to inform that Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education , have
successfully completed its VIIth year with continuous progress and have come to be
recognized as one of the premier institute specially in the field of professional courses
at pachama Sehore (M.P.).
The level of discipline and academic achievements that this college have
obtained is admirable. It is not only the management but a team of workers whose
inspiration, dedication & motivation have made this institute to go to such greater
heights in the fields of education. I have no doubt that this institute will travel with
strength to strength.
It is my privilege to welcome the NAAC team to access this institute.
I sincerely wish all the staff of this institute for a great success with the divine
blessings of the almighty.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 4
FROM PRINCIPAL DESK
Dear Students,
Tomorrow are required to possess an optimal mix of knowledge and
professional skills. It is desired from these teachers to possess the capabilities to cope
up with the fast changing while at the same time exhibiting high professional
competence and positive moral aptitudes. Careers in are the backbone of industries and
the nation.
The vision of Aayushmati Education of Social Society, which imparts the
quality education in B.Ed. through Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education
Pachma Sehore MP.
These institutes have state-of-the-art infrastructures, well- equipped
laboratories, library and computer centers with qualified and experienced faculties.
I welcome the entire NAAC team to these institute.
Our Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education is committed to in-depth
knowledge & belleves in creating a free bothersome less environment for students,
trained faculties are being engaged for the purpose.
Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education is a creation sanstha A leading
education society fundamentally engaged in training education and info services.
As you know Aayushmati Education of Social Society is an organization which
was founded with the noble objectives of spreading the light of education among the
after full working successfully and having a lot of achievements in the field of total
programme, continuing education and professional education with all appreciation the
school and higher education authorities granted permission organization also got the
approval of national council for teachers education (NCTE) Sri Satya Sai Institute of
Teacher Education has been established by Aayushmati Education of Social Society.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 5
PREFACE:
Few words with students
Our heartily congratulation to all the B.Ed. pass students. No doubt you are
seeking for a best college which could provide you best knowledge. We welcome you
to our institute with extended arms.
Our institute is a dream for those who are keen for quality education. So do join
us and let your dreams comes true. Your faith & hard work is component of our wealth,
if your choice is right it will make your future bright.
This is very important time of your life to choose a correct path so by joining us
for qualitative education, grebe the opportunity and give value to your precisions life.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 6
Preamble
To achieve the golden goals set out in the preamble of the constitution
justice liberty, equality and fraternity the idem polity has to be educated
and educated with excellence education is a national weakly which must
be distributed equality and widely as for as possible in the interest the
creafine and egalitarian society to enable the country to rise high and face
globule competition education institute are temples of learning the
nurtures of human .
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 7
A. Profile of the Institution
1. Name and address of the institution: Sri Satya Sai Institute ofTeacher education , Indore-Bhopal Road, Pachama Sehore (M.P.)
2. Website URL : sssist.in
3. For communication:
OfficeName Telephone
Number withSTD Code
Fax No E-Mail Address
Head/Principal :Ms. Neelam Khare
07562-223647 07562-224636
Vice-Principal : Mr.Dheeraj Kumar
07562-223647 07562-224636
Self - appraisalCo-ordinator :Mr.Rishikesh Yadav
07562-223647 07562-224636
Residence
Name TelephoneNumberwith STD
Code
Mobile Number
Head/Principal: Ms. Neelam Khare 07562224636
9009575088
Vice-Principal : Mr. Dheeraj Kumar 07562 224636 9827283834
Self - appraisal Co-ordinator : Mr.Rishikesh Yadav
07562 224636 9039914648
4. Location of the Institution:
√
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 8
Urban Semi-urban Rural Tribal
Any other (specify and indicate)
5. Campus area in acres:6. Is it a recognized minority institution? Yes No
7. Date of establishment of the institution:Month & Year
8. University/Board to which the institution is affiliated:
9. Details of UGC recognition under sections 2(f) and 12(B) of the UGC Act.Month & Year
2f
Month & Year
12B
10. Type of Institution
a. By funding i. Governmentii. Grant-in-aidiii. Constituentiv. Self-financedv. Any other (specify and indicate)
b. By Gender i. Only for Menii. Only for Womeniii. Co-education
c. By Nature i. University Dept.ii. IASEiii. Autonomous Collegeiv. Affiliated College
3
Barkatullah University Bhopal
√
√.RakeshSingh
MM YYYY
04 2007
MM YYYY
MM YYYY
√.RakeshSingh√.RakeshSingh
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 9
v. Constituent Collegevi. Dept. of Education of Composite
Collegevii. CTEViii. Any other (specify and indicate)
11. Does the University / State Education Act have provision for autonomy?
Yes No
If yes, has the institution applied for autonomy?
Yes No
12. Details of Teacher Education programmes offered by the institution:
Sl.No.
Level Programme/ Course
EntryQualificati
on
Nature ofAward
Duration Medium ofinstruction
i) Pre-primaryCertificateDiplomaDegree
ii) Primary/Elementary
CertificateDiplomaDegree
iii) Secondary/Sr. secondary
CertificateDiploma
B.Ed. Graduation
Degree 01 year Hindi &English
iv. PostGraduate
DiplomaDegree
v.Other(specify)
CertificateDiplomaDegree
(Additional rows may be inserted as per requirement)
√
√
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 10
13. Give details of NCTE recognition (for each programme mentioned in Q.12above)
Level Programme
Order No. & Date Valid
upto
Sanctioned Intake
Pre-primaryPrimary/Elementary
Secondary/Sr.secondary
B.Ed. No.WRC/5-6/106th/2008/40332
2007-2013
100
Post Graduate
Other (specify)(Additional rows may be inserted as per requirement)
B) Criterion-wise inputs
Criterion I: Curricular Aspects
1. Does the Institution have a statedVision
Mission
Values
Objectives
2. a) Does the institution offer self-financed programme(s)?
If yes,
a) How many programmes?
b) Fee charged per programme
3. Are there programmes with semester system NO
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
01
25000
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 11
4. Is the institution representing/participating in the curriculumdevelopment/ revision processes of the regulatory bodies?
If yes, how many faculty are on the various curriculumdevelopment/vision committees/boards of universities/regulatingauthority.
5. Number of methods/elective options (programme wise)
D.Ed.
B.Ed.
M.Ed. (Full Time)
M.Ed. (Part Time)
Any other (specify and indicate)
6. Are there Programmes offered in modular form
7. Are there Programmes where assessment of teachers by the students hasbeen introduced
8. Are there Programmes with faculty exchange/visiting faculty
2/1
Yes √ No
Number 10
Yes √ No
02
Yes √ No
Number 6
Yes No √
Number
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 12
9. Is there any mechanism to obtain feedback on the curricular aspects from
the
Heads of practice teaching schools
Academic peers
Alumni
Students
Employers
10. How long does it take for the institution to introduce a new programme
within the existing system?
11. Has the institution introduced any new courses in teacher education
during the last three years?
12. Are there courses in which major syllabus revision was done during thelast five years?
13. Does the institution develop and deploy action plans for effective
implementation of the curriculum?
14. Does the institution encourage the faculty to prepare course outlines?
NA
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Number
Yes √ No
Number
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 13
Criterion II: Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
1. How are students selected for admission into various courses?a) Through an entrance test developed by the institution
b) Common entrance test conducted by the
University/Government
c) Through an interview
d) Entrance test and interview
e) Merit at the qualifying examination
f) Any other (specify and indicate)(If more than one method is followed, kindly specify the weightages)
2. Furnish the following information (for the previous academic year):a) Date of start of the academic yearb) Date of last admissionc) Date of closing of the academic yeard) Total teaching dayse) Total working days
3. Total number of students admitted
Programme Number ofstudents Reserved Open
M F Total M F Total M F Total
D.Ed.
B.Ed. 56 44 100 36 30 66 26 18 34
M.Ed. (FullTime)M.Ed. (PartTime)
4. Are there any overseas students?
If yes, how many?
√
√
Yes No √
02.02.1225/02/12
11.10.2012140
214
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 14
5. What is the ‘unit cost’ of teacher education programme? (Unit cost = total
annual recurring expenditure divided by the number of students/ trainees
enrolled).
a) Unit cost excluding salary componentb) Unit cost including salary component
(Please provide the unit cost for each of the programme offered by the institution
as detailed at Question 12 of profile of the institution)
6. Highest and Lowest percentage of marks at the qualifying examination
considered for admission during the previous academic session
Programmes
Open Reserved
Highest
(%)
Lowest
(%)
Highest
(%)
Lowest
(%)
D.Ed.
B.Ed. 73.7 63.5 73.8 60.7
M.Ed. (FullTime)M.Ed. (PartTime)
7. Is there a provision for assessing students’ knowledge and skills for theprogramme (after admission)?
8. Does the institution develop its academic calendar?
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 15
9. Time allotted (in percentage)
Programmes Theory PracticeTeaching Practicum
D.Ed.
B.Ed. 60 20 20
M.Ed. (Full Time)
M.Ed. (Part Time)
10. Pre-practice teaching at the institution
a) Number of pre-practice teaching days
b) Minimum number of pre-practice teachinglessons given by each student
11. Practice Teaching at School
a) Number of schools identified for practiceteaching
b) Total number of practice teaching days
c) Minimum number of practice teachinglessons given by each student
12. How many lessons are given by the student teachers in simulation and pre-practice teaching in classroom situations?
13. Is the scheme of evaluation made known to students at the beginning of theacademic session?
14. Does the institution provide for continuous evaluation?
4 0
3 0
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
1 0
1 0
1 0
No. of Lessons Insimulation
No. 05 No. of Lessons Pre-practiceteaching
No. 05
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 16
15. Weightage (in percentage) given to internal and external evaluation
Programmes Internal External
D.Ed.
B.Ed. 10% 20%
M.Ed. (Full Time)
M.Ed. (Part Time)
16. Examinations
a) Number of sessional tests held for each paper
b) Number of assignments for each paper
17. Access to ICT (Information and Communication Technology) andtechnology.
Yes No
Computers Yes
Intranet Yes
Internet Yes
Software / courseware (CDs) Yes
Audio resources Yes
Video resources Yes
Teaching Aids and other relatedmaterials
Yes
Any other (specify and indicate) Yes
18. Are there courses with ICT enabled teaching-learning process?
0 2
0 2
Yes √ No
Number 04
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 17
19. Does the institution offer computer science as a subject?
If yes, is it offered as a compulsory or optional paper?
Compulsory Optional
Criterion III: Research, Consultancy and Extension
1. Number of teachers with Ph. D and their percentage to the total faculty
strength
2. Does the Institution have ongoing research projects?
If yes, provide the following details on the ongoing researchprojects
Funding agency Amount (Rs) Duration (years) Collaboration, if any
(Additional rows/columns may be inserted as per the requirement)
3. Number of completed research projects during last three years.
4. How does the institution motivate its teachers to take up research ineducation? (Mark for positive response and X for negative response) Teachers are given study leave Teachers are provided with seed money Adjustment in teaching schedule Providing secretarial support and other facilities Any other specify and indicate
Yes √ No
√
√√
Yes √ No
√
1Number %
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 18
5. Does the institution provide financial support to research scholars?
6. Number of research degrees awarded during the last 5 years.a. Ph.D.
b. M.Phil.
7. Does the institution support student research projects (UG & PG)?
8. Details of the Publications by the faculty (Last five years)
Yes No Number
International journals
National journals – referred papers
Non referred papers Yes 02
Academic articles in reputedmagazines/news papers
Yes 04
Books Yes 04
Any other (specify and indicate)
9. Are there awards, recognition, patents etc received by the faculty?
10. Number of papers presented by the faculty and students (during last five
years): Faculty Students
National seminars
International seminars
Any other academic forum
√
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
√
Yes √ No
Number 02
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 19
11. What types of instructional materials have been developed by theinstitution?(Mark `’ for yes and `X’ for No.)
Self-instructional materialsPrint materialsNon-print materials (e.g. TeachingAids/audio-visual, multimedia, etc.)Digitalized (Computer aided instructional materials)Question bankAny other (specify and indicate)
12. Does the institution have a designated person for extension activities?
If yes, indicate the nature of the post.
Full-time Part-time Additional charge
13. Are there NSS and NCC programmes in the institution?
14. Are there any other outreach programmes provided by the institution?
15. Number of other curricular/co-curricular meets organized by otheracademic agencies/NGOs on Campus
16. Does the institution provide consultancy services?
In case of paid consultancy what is the net amount generated during last threeyears.
√√
√√√√
√
Yes √ No
Yes No √
Yes √ No
02
FREE
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 20
17. Does the institution have networking/linkage with other institutions/organizations?
Local level √State levelNational levelInternational level
Criterion IV: Infrastructure and Learning Resources1. Built-up Area (in sq. mts.)
2. Are the following laboratories been established as per NCTE Norms?
a) Methods lab Yes No
b) Psychology lab Yes No
c) Science Lab(s) Yes No
d) Education Technology lab Yes No
e) Computer lab Yes Nof) Workshop for preparing
teaching aids Yes No
3. How many Computer terminals are available with the institution?
4. What is the Budget allotted for computers (purchase and maintenance)
during the previous academic year?
5. What is the Amount spent on maintenance of computer facilities during the
previous academic year?
6. What is the Amount spent on maintenance and upgrading of laboratoryfacilities during the previous academic year?
3697
√
√
√
√
√
120
√
NIL
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 21
7. What is the Budget allocated for campus expansion (building) and upkeepfor the current academic session/financial year?
8. Has the institution developed computer-aided learning packages?
9. Total number of posts sanctioned Open Reserved
Teaching
Non-teaching
10. Total number of posts vacant Open Reserved
Teaching
Non-teaching
11. a. Number of regular and permanent teachers Open Reserved
(Gender-wise)
Lecturers
Readers
Professors
Yes √ No
M F M F
1
M F M F
1
M F M F
2 1 2
M F M F
1 1 1 1
M F M F
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 22
b. Number of temporary/ad-hoc/part-time teachers (Gender-wise)Open Reserved
Lecturers
Readers
Professors
c. Number of teachers from Same state
Other states
12. Teacher student ratio (program-wise)
Programme Teacher studentratio
D.Ed.B.Ed. 1-12M.Ed. (Full Time)M.Ed. (Part Time)
13. a. Non-teaching staff Open Reserved
Permanent
Temporary
b. Technical Assistants Permanent
Temporary
14. Ratio of Teaching – non-teaching staff
04
8-8
04
M F M F
M F M F
M F M F
M F M F
3 2M F M F
M F M F
3
M F M F
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 23
15. Amount spent on the salaries of teaching faculty during the previousacademic session (% of total expenditure)
16. Is there an advisory committee for the library?
17. Working hours of the Library
On working days
On holidays
During examinations
18. Does the library have an Open access facility
19. Total collection of the following in the library
a. Books
- Textbooks
- Reference books
b. Magazines
e. Journals subscribed
- Indian journals
- Foreign journals
f. Peer reviewed journals
g. Back volumes of journals
h. E-information resources
- Online journals/e-journals
- CDs/ DVDs
- Databases
- Video Cassettes
Yes √ No
6
Yes √ No
3500
2800
450
25
10
9
120
Available
Available
Available
Available
5
57
Available
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 24
- Audio Cassettes
20. Mention the
Total carpet area of the Library (in sq. mts.)
Seating capacity of the Reading room
21. Status of automation of Library
Yet to intimate
Partially automated
Fully automated
22. Which of the following services/facilities are provided in the library?
Circulation
Clipping
Bibliographic compilation
Reference
Information display and notification
Book Bank
Photocopying
Computer and Printer
Internet
Online access facility
Inter-library borrowing
Power back up
User orientation /information literacy
Any other (please specify and indicate)
23. Are students allowed to retain books for examinations?
55.76 sqm
√
√
Yes No
√√√
√√√
√
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 25
24. Furnish information on the following
Average number of books issued/returned per day
Maximum number of days books are permitted to be retained
by students
by faculty
Maximum number of books permitted for issue
for students
for faculty
Average number of users who visited/consulted per month
Ratio of library books (excluding textbooks and book bank
facility)to the number of students enrolled
25. What is the percentage of library budget in relation to total budget of the
institution
26. Provide the number of books/ journals/ periodicals that have been addedto the library during the last three years and their cost.
I II III
Number Total cost(in Rs.)
Number Total cost(in Rs.)
Number Total cost(in Rs.)
Text books 2500 300000 500 75000 500 100000
Other books
Journals/Periodicals
30 1500 20 2000 10 1000
Any othersspecify andindicate(Additional rows/columns may be inserted as per requirement)
40
15
90
15
02
03
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 26
Criterion V: Student Support and Progression
1. Programme wise “dropout rate” for the last three batches
Programmes Year 1 Year 2 Year 3D.Ed.B.Ed. 3 2 3M.Ed. (FullTime)M.Ed. (PartTime)
2. Does the Institution have the tutor-ward/or any similar mentoring system?
If yes, how many students are under the care of a mentor/tutor?
3. Does the institution offer Remedial instruction?
4. Does the institution offer Bridge courses?
5. Examination Results during past three years (provide year wise data)
UG PG M. Phil
I II III I II III I II III
Pass percentage 86% 89% 90%
Number of firstclasses
84% 80% 75%
Number ofdistinctions
10% 12%
Exemplaryperformances
(Gold Medal anduniversity ranks)
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 27
6. Number of students who have passed competitive examinations duringthe last three years (provide year wise data)
NET
SLET/SET
Any other (specify and indicate)
7. Mention the number of students who have received financial aid during
the past three years.
Financial Aid I II IIIMerit ScholarshipMerit-cum-meansscholarshipFee concessionLoan facilitiesAny other specify andindicate
(Additional rows may be inserted as per requirement)
8. Is there a Health Centre available in the campus of the institution?
9. Does the institution provide Residential accommodation for:
Faculty
Non-teaching staff
Yes √ No
Yes No √
Yes No √
I
nil
nil
II III
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 28
10. Does the institution provide Hostel facility for its students?
If yes, number of students residing in hostels
Men
Women
11. Does the institution provide indoor and outdoor sports facilities?
Sports fields
Indoor sports facilities
Gymnasium
12. Availability of rest rooms for Women
13. Availability of rest rooms for men
14. Is there transport facility available?
15. Does the Institution obtain feedback from students on their campusexperience?
16. Give information on the Cultural Events (Last year data) in which the
institution participated/organised.
Organised ParticipatedYes No Number Yes No Number
Inter-collegiate Yes 04 Yes 04
Inter-university
National
Any other
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes No √
Yes √ No
√
√
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 29
(specify andindicate)
(Excluding college day celebration)
17. Give details of the participation of students during the past year at theuniversity, state, regional, national and international sports meets.
Participation of students(Numbers)
Outcome(Medal achievers)
StateRegionalNationalInternational
18. Does the institution have an active Alumni Association?
If yes, give the year of establishment
19. Does the institution have a Student Association/Council?
20. Does the institution regularly publish a college magazine?
21. Does the institution publish its updated prospectus annually?
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
2011-2012
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 30
22. Give the details on the progression of the students to employment/furtherstudy (Give percentage) for last three years
Year 1
(%)
Year 2
(%)
Year 3
(%)
Higher studies 60 40 50
Employment (Total) 5 10 20
Teaching
Non teaching
5 5 5
5 7 8
23. Is there a placement cell in the institution?
If yes, how many students were employed through placement cell during the
past three years.
1 2 320 10 15
24. Does the institution provide the following guidance and counselling
services to students? Yes No
Academic guidance and Counseling Personal Counseling Career Counseling
Yes √ No
√√√
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 31
Criterion VI: Governance and Leadership
1. Does the institution have a functional Internal Quality Assurance Cell
(IQAC) or any other similar body/committee
2. Frequency of meetings of Academic and Administrative Bodies: (last year)
Governing Body/management 3
Staff council 6
IQAC/or any other similar body/committee 4
Internal Administrative Bodies contributing to quality improvementof the institutional processes. (mention only for three most importantbodies)
IQACCELL
3. What are the Welfare Schemes available for the teaching and non-teaching
staff of the institution?
Loan facility
Medical assistance
Insurance
Other (specify and indicate)
4. Number of career development programmes made available for non-teaching staff during the last three years
3 3 3
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes No √
Yes No √
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 32
5. Furnish the following details for the past three years
a. Number of teachers who have availed the Faculty ImprovementProgram of the UGC/NCTE or any other recognizedorganisation
b. Number of teachers who were sponsored for professional developmentprogrammes by the institution
National
International
c. Number of faculty development programmes organized by theInstitution:
d. Number of Seminars/ workshops/symposia on Curricular development,
Teaching- learning, Assessment, etc. organised by the institution
e. Research development programmes attended by the faculty
f. Invited/endowment lectures at the institution
Any other area (specify the programme and indicate)
4
2
1 1 1
2 2 2
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 33
6. How does the institution monitor the performance of the teaching and non-teaching staff?
a. Self-appraisal
b. Student assessment of faculty performance
c. Expert assessment of faculty performance
d. Combination of one or more of the above
e. Any other (specify and indicate)
7. Are the faculty assigned additional administrative work?
If yes, give the number of hours spent by the faculty per week
8. Provide the income received under various heads of the account by the
institution for previous academic session
Grant-in-aid
Fees
Donation
Self-funded courses
Any other (specify and indicate)
9. Expenditure statement (for last two years)
Year 1 Year2
Total sanctioned Budget 100% 100%% spent on the salary of faculty 57% 58%% spent on the salary of non-teaching employees 20% 22%% spent on books and journals 5% 5%% spent on developmental activities (expansion of
building)0 0
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
15
2500000
yes
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 34
% spent on telephone, electricity and water 6% 5%% spent on maintenance of building, sports facilities,hostels, residential complex and student amenities,etc.
2% 2%
% spent on maintenance of equipment, teaching aids,contingency etc.
4% 3%
% spent on research and scholarship (seminars,conferences, faculty development programs, facultyexchange, etc.)
5% 4%
% spent on travel 1% 1%Any other (specify and indicate)Total expenditure incurred 100 100
10. Specify the institutions surplus/deficit budget during the last three years?(specify the amount in the applicable boxes given below)
Surplus in Rs. Deficit in Rs.
11. Is there an internal financial audit mechanism?
12. Is there an external financial audit mechanism?
13. ICT/Technology supported activities/units of the institution:
Administration
Finance
Student Records
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
312235
377580
223932
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 35
Career Counselling
Aptitude Testing
Examinations/Evaluation/
Assessment
Any other (specify and indicate)
14. Does the institution have an efficient internal co-ordinating and monitoring
mechanism?
15. Does the institution have an inbuilt mechanism to check the work
efficiency of the non-teaching staff?
16. Are all the decisions taken by the institution during the last three years
approved by a competent authority?
17. Does the institution have the freedom and the resources to appoint and pay
temporary/ ad hoc / guest teaching staff?
18. Is a grievance redressal mechanism in vogue in the institution?a) for teachers
b) for students
c) for non - teaching staff
19. Are there any ongoing legal disputes pertaining to the institution?
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
√√
√
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes No √
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 36
20. Has the institution adopted any mechanism/process for internal academicaudit/quality checks?
21. Is the institution sensitised to modern managerial concepts such asstrategic planning, teamwork, decision-making, computerisation andTQM?
Criterion VII: Innovative Practices
1. Does the institution has an established Internal Quality AssuranceMechanisms ?
2. Do students participate in the Quality Enhancement of the Institution?
3. What is the percentage of the following student categories in theinstitution?
Category Men % Women %a SC 6% 11%b ST 1%c OBC 16% 14%d Physically
challenged01
e General Category 38f Ruralg Urbanh Any other
( specify)13
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Yes √ No
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 37
4. What is the percentage of the staff in the following category ?
Category Teachingstaff
% Non-teachingstaff
%
a SC 1b STc OBC 4d Women 2e Physically
challengedf General Category 2g Any other
( specify)
5. What is the percentage incremental academic growth of the students for thelast two batches?
Category At Admission On completion of the courseBatch I Batch II Batch I Batch II
SC 17 15ST 1 2OBC 30 31Physicallychallenged
1
GeneralCategory
38 35
RuralUrbanAny other( specify)
13 17
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 38
Part II: The Evaluative Report
This part of the report has to present a meaningful self-evaluation of theinstitution giving details on the aspects and processes with reference to the corevalues explained earlier. This part also requires key aspects wise details. Itshould be organized under the following three sections - an Executivesummary giving a brief on the SWOT analysis of the institution, Criterion-wiseanalysis of the specified key aspects and Mapping of Academic Activities of theInstitution. All the three sections put together should not exceed 200 pages. Tobe able to adhere to the page limit, repetition of descriptive information alreadygiven may be avoided by providing appropriate reference. Overall the detailsprovided in this section should basically strengthen the quantitative dataprovided in Part I of this manual.
1. Executive SummaryThis may be a brief summary not exceeding two pages, covering institutionspecific information i.e. the environment in which the institution operates, theregulatory bodies and their controls, key relationship with the practice teachingschools and the community and the challenges faced by the institution inbuilding a quality institution.
2. Criterion- Wise Analysis:
Care may be taken to make this part of the report brief and evaluative byproviding only crucial details. The questions given below each criterion aremeant to help the institution to cover the major aspects of the variousinstitutional processes and quality initiatives of the institution. Informationoverlaps and repetitions may be avoided by giving appropriate references tothe details/information provided in the earlier sections or questions.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 39
Criterion I: Curricular Aspects
1.1 Curricular Design and DevelopmentIntroduction: Year of the Establishment:2007
As you know Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education, Ayushmati Education &
Social Society is an organization which was founded with the noble objectives of
spreading the light of education among the illiterate people of our country. After full
working successfully.
State the objective of the Sri Satya sai Institute of the teacher education pachama
Sehore.
Objectives:
1.Self development
2. Community and National development & ecology and green healthy environment .
3. Various stapes in the curricular development process
Latest knowledge of subject by creating an inspiring atmosphere of learning to
provide personality development program as one of the far reaching movement
created by the college.
To make students achieve an all round excellence in Academics, Sports,
Cultural & Social activities and to fulfill one’s obligation towards college.
Create an average competitive spirit
To prepare teachers suitable to the modern times and educational requirements
To develop tendencies of innovation and research among teachers.
RECOGNITION / AFFILIATION:
The college is Affiliated to Barkatullah University, Bhopal
College is Approved by the National Council for Teacher Education (GOI)
NCTE
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 40
FACULTY:
The biggest asset of our institute is our faculty. The faculty comprises an
available symbioses of diverse talents. Young and highly energetic faculty is extremely
committed to the cause of the students. Due to their fresh minds and unbiased thinking
they always try to experiment with innovative ideas and incorporate them in their
training methodology. The full time faculty comprises highly Qualified, Devoted,
Lecturers and instructors .
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE COLLEGE: (Building)
A. i. Spacious, well lightened, ventilated and well accommodated
classrooms.
ii. Science and psychology lab having various tests, experiment and
equipments
iii. Emphasis on practical knowledge through lab sessions, projects
report preparation.
iv. Seminars, personality development programmes, workshops etc. are
organized as a part of the curriculum.
v. Pollution free environment
B:
I. Workshop & seminars a regular feature.
ii. Intel P-IV computer labs.
iii. Hygienic mess and canteen facility
iv. Well established computerized library
v. Medical care with daily doctors visit.
vi. Bank & ATM facility at campus
vii. Language Lab
viii. Indoor stadium
ix. Hostel
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 41
CANTEEN :
A well-managed and hygienic canteen in institute premises provides
refreshment to the students.
Institute Provide teaching experience in B.Ed Training Students & Assiement,
Projects, Internal Assessment
S.No Group
Filed Experience
Method
I
Evaluation
1 Teaching of Subject-I Plan-20 Language English,
Hindi,
Sanskrit
Internal
Assessment
2 Teaching of Subject-II Plan –II Social
Study/
science/
Math
Internal
3 Criticism Lesson Internal
4 Assignment Each paper of 10
marks
Internal
5 Final lesson in Subject I 3int+3Ext.
6 Final lesson in Subject II 3int+3Ext.
7 Work Experience I SU PW
Work Experience II
Teaching in school (Teaching
Experience)
Int.+ Ext.
Int.+ Ext.
8 Working with community /
Social Services
Internal
9 Psychlogy Experiments Int.+ Ext.
10 Multi skills development in
Students Teachers in
Microteaching Fild
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 42
SUPW in used full for productive work in teaching learning material as books,
notebook, chart, blackboard, slide, overhead projector, education kit, science kit,
mathematic kit used in lesson plan in teaching time team teaching a teaching technique
in which for teaching share responsibility programmers with the same group of learners
Technology used B.Ed. training candidate know and under stand about information
technology to yoga so working teacher effectively students
1.2 Academic Flexibility
The Sri satya sai Institute of Teacher Education attempt to provide
teaching experiences to the 100 students and microteaching lesson also so
that teaching becomes a reflective practice.
In students develop in all communication skills verbal & written ICT
skills life, skills community orientation social responsibility etc.
Sri satya sai Institute of Teacher Education ensure the inclusion work
experience , Multi- skills development, internship in teaching school ,
microteaching lesson plan etc.
Multi Skills Development :
Microteaching Skills:
Microteaching skills used the teacher education technique which allows
teachers to apply clearly defined teaching skills to carefully prepared
lesson in a planned series of five to ten minutes encounter with a small
group of real students often with an opportunity to observe the results
on videotape. In microteaching time teacher depend on the three process.
Knowledge Acquisition phase, Skill acquisition phase, Transfer phase,
microteaching is a teacher training procedure which reduces the teaching
situation to a simpler and more controlled encounter achieved by
limiting the practice teaching to a specific skill and reducing teaching
time and class size. The microteaching teacher the main term plan, teach,
feedback, replan, reteach, refeedback,
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 43
1.3: Feedback on Curriculum :
Provide sample of students feedback on curriculum and faculty, Feedback mechanism
in yoga in B.Ed. Students. Institution sanities the B.Ed teacher Students in curriculum
factures feedback in academic plan for students to learning & teaching creative
learning environment and self motivation by feedback students teachers develop
proficiency for working with children. The B.Ed curriculum revision is based on the
feedback, database and teaching experience in school of implementation. Thus it is
important that the school teaching experiences interned pr practice teaching feedback
and insights of all concerned are collected and the areas of weaknesses and redundancy
in the curriculum obtaining and analyzing feedback/ responses from academic peers
students and employers and their appropriate use for review, design and restructuring
the curriculum reflects the institutions effort towards quality enhancement Institution
encourage the B.Ed tearing students teacher to whole development and given feedback
Sample Questionnaires for Feedback from Students
Affiliated Colleges
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 44
Questionnaire No. 1
College: Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education
Programme: B.Ed.
Department: B.Ed. Semester/Term/Year:Year
Students are required to rate the courses on the following attributes using the 4
-point scale shown. The format given is for one course. Do the same for other
courses on separate page.
4.00 3.00 2.00 1.50 0.0
A B C D
Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Course-I
ParametersA
Very Good
B
Good
C
Satisfa
ctory
D
Unsatisfac
tory
1. Depth of the course content
including project work if any
2. Extent of coverage of course
3. Applicability/relevance to real life
situations
4. Learning value (in terms of
knowledge, concepts, manual
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 45
skills, analytical abilities and
broadening perspectives)
5. Clarity and relevance of textual
reading material
6. Relevance of additional source
material (Library)
7. Extent of effort required by
students
8. Overall rating
3.00
3.00
2.00
Questionnaire No. 2
College: Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education
Student Feedback on Teachers
Department : B.Ed. Semester/Term/Year : Year
Please rate the teacher on the following attributes using the 4 -point scale shown
4.00 3.00 2.00 1.50 0.0
A B C D
Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Name of the Teacher:
ParametersA
Very
Good
B
Good
C
Satisfact
ory
D
Unsatisfacto
ry
1. Knowledge base of the teacher (as 4.00
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 46
perceived by you) (Historical places of
India)
2. Communication Skills (in terms of
articulation and comprehensibility)
3. Sincerity / Commitment of the teacher
4. Interest generated by the teacher
5. Ability to integrate course material with
environment/other issues, to provide a
broader perspective
6. Ability to integrate content with other
courses
7. Accessibility of the teacher in and out of
the class (includes availability of the
teacher to motivate further study and
discussion outside class)
8. Ability to design quizzes /Tests
/assignments / examinations and
projects to evaluate students
understanding of the course
9. Provision of sufficient time for feedback
10. Overall rating
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.4 Curriculum Update
COURSES:
Paper (I) Teacher in emerging Indian society
Paper (II) Development of lamer and teaching learning process
Paper (III) Development of education system in India
Paper(IV) Essentials of education technology and management
Paper (V & VI) any two school subjects to be studied as method paper, these
will be based on the main subjects or the main and one of the ancillary subjects in the
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 47
case of graduates, and the subject offered in post graduation should be the same as in
graduation except in the case of those who have offered the fundamental subjects like
philosophy, psychology OR M.A. education.
Paper (V& VI) Methodist Teaching
Category A Category B
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2
Teaching of
(i) Hindi
(ii) Englis
h
(iii) Sanskr
it
(iv) Urdu
Teaching of
(i) Social
Science
(ii) Civics
(iii) Economi
cs
(iv) Geograp
hy
(v) Social
studies
(vi) History
Teaching of
(ii) Science
(iii) Chemist
ry
(iv) Physics
Teaching of
(i) Life
science
(ii) Mathemati
cs
Paper (VII) Elective Subject (any one of the following)
i. Elementary Education ii. Population Education iii. Environmental
Education
iv. Alternative Education v. Educational Administration & Management
vi. Educational and mental measurement vii. Physical education
viii. Career information in career guidance ix. Teaching of values.
Practical Papers:
i. Field based experience including practice teaching
ii. Co- Curricular activities including physical & health education and work
experience
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 48
Institution attempted to provide teaching experiences to the B.Ed students. So
that teaching reflective practice total practice teaching day 40 . 20 lesson
language and 20 lesson method-II 20 lesson plan given by each B.Ed. Students .
B.Ed. Book & Author’sS.No. Titles Author’s
1 vk/kqfud Hkkjr es f’k{kk MkW- vo/ks’k fd’kksj
2 Hkkjrh; f’k{kk dk bfrgkl ,oa fodkl xqjlunkl R;kxh
3 mnh;eku Hkkjrh; lekt esa f’k{kd MkW- jke’kdy ik.Ms;
4 mnh;eku Hkkjrh; lekt esa f’k{kd MkW- ik.Ms;@T;ksfr ’kekZ
5 mnh;eku Hkkjr es f’k{kk xqjlunkl R;kxh
6 mnh;eku Hkkjrh; lekt esa f’k{kk tas-lh vxzoky
7 f'k{kk vkSj lekt eerk dksBkjh
8 f'k{kk rFkk mnh;eku Hkkjrh; lekt MkW- jkeiky flag
9 Development of Education system in India Dr. R.S. Pandey
10 Development of Edu. System in India Johri/ Pathak
11 f'k{kk euksfoKku ih Mh IkkBd
12 f'k{kk euksfoKku MkW- lsokuh @flag
13 vf/kxedrkZ dk fodkl vkSj f’k{k.k vf/k-
izfdz;k
MkW- ds- th- ’kekZ@ tks’kh
14 vf/kxe dk euksfoKku MkW- jkeiky flag
15 Education psychology Dr. S.S. Mathur
16 f'k{kk dk fl}kUr xqjlunkl R;kxh
17 f'k{kk ds nk’kZfud fl}kUr ikBd @ R;kxh
18 f'k{kk ds nk’kZfud ,oa lkekftd vk/kkj xqjlunkl R;kxh
19 f'k{kk ds nk’kZfud vk/kkj MkW- vks ih ’kekZ
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 49
20 ’kSf{kd fopkj ,oa O;ogkj xqjlunkl R;kxh@lquhrk
21 ’kSf{kd rduhdh ds ewyk/kkj MkW- ,l ih dqyJsB
22 ’kSf{kd rduhdh ,oa izca/k ts lh vxzoky
23 ’kSf{kd rduhdh ,oa izca/k ds vk/kkj ts lh vxzoky
24 i;kZoj.k f’k{kk MkW- mik/;k;
25 i;kZoj.k f’k{kk MkW- ,e ds xks;y
26 i;kZoj.k f’k{kk ,oa mldk f’k{k.k yksds'k ’kekZ
27 v/;kid f’k{kk MkW- th lh HkVkVpk;Z
28 dEI;wVj f’k{kk MkW- ds ds ;kno
29 fgUnh Hkk"kk f’k{k.k MkW- jke’kdy ik.Ms;
30 fgUnh f’k{k.k ’kjn HkVukxj
31 lkekftd foKku MkW- fou;
32 foKku f’k{k.k , ds uk;d
33 laLd`r f’k{k.k jkts'k ’kekZ
34 vaxzsth f’k{k.k vkj ds tSu
35 lkekftd v/;;u f’k{k.k ikB ;kstuk Jhefr vuq xxZ
36 xf.kr f’k{k.k ikB ;kstuk vt; dqekj caly
37 tho foKku f’k{k.k ikB ;kstuk lk/kuk
38 HkkSfrd foKku f’k{k.k ikB ;kstuk lk/kuk
39 Okkf.kT; f’k{k.k ikB ;kstuk izKk ’kEkkZ
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 50
ABOUT B.Ed.:
Aims and Objective: Toward quality teacher education the main goals behind
opening the college of education are:
To bring the quality in education specially in teacher education. To prepare
competent and skilled teacher.
To implement new ideas and innovation in the field of teacher education.
To bring all round development with positive attitude toward teaching
profession.
To inculcate moral values and professional ethics among future teachers.
To make teachers trainees proficient in academic and extra curricular
activities.
Internal Test in Examination : There are various way of assessing and
evaluating teaching work. The measurement of achievement is generally
done through examination. Testing is an essential part of teaching. Test
examination and evaluation are the three main ways to assess the
achievements of the students. They are beneficial to both the students, as
well as the teachers. The result of such assessments provide an index to
the achievements of the students and it also measures, the effectiveness
of the method of teaching, adopted by the teacher. So test examination
and evaluation are very important in the process of teaching.
Test is good teaching device, therefore, it must be designed properly.
If a majority of students know or marked or told the correct answers, it
means that the teacher has taught the lesson successfully.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 51
Types of Questions: Three types of questions can be asked (1) Objective
Type Or Recognition Types (2) Short answer type (3) Essay types
Lesson Plan: A teacher may have the knowledge of teaching principle ,
teaching techniques and subject but his classroom teaching will be
successful. Only it he prepares his lesson plan matching the requirement
of his pupils and in a scientific manner in other words without preparing
lesson plans successful teaching is impossible on the importance of
lesson planning.
Lesson planning signifies the preparation of a teacher in which he
decides- how to teach his students what has he to teach why he has to
reach and by taking help of which device his teaching will be more
successful.
Which type of material should be used in the teaching process. Which
type of questions should be asked to know their understanding of the
topic of acknowledge.
1. through lesson planning the subject is organized properly
2. It makes proper atmosphere for learning process
3. Lesson planning helps in deciding the objectives of a lesson
4. It makes the work of a teacher co-operative and regular
5. This motivates a teacher for asking important question from his pupils.
6.Through this definite works are organized for the children
7.Through this the summary of lesson can be wall climaxed
8.Subject time class average age of the students should be mentioned in
the lesson plan
9.A teacher should know general theories and methods of teaching their
nature and their utilization.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 52
10 The plans of all the lesson should not be made in a particular typical
form.
1.5 Best Practices in curricular Aspects:
Quality sustenance and quality enhancement measures by the Sri satya sai institute of
Teacher education the last five years in curriculum aspects:
1.quest for excellence contributing of National Program
2.Promoting the use of technology
3. Quest for excellence
4.Skill development of students
5.Institution should also demonstrated drive to development of excellence
Extra co curriculum Activities
All over development
Practice teaching visit in the school:
S.N
o
Name of
teaching School
No.
of
Lesio
n
Plan
Teaching
Methods
Language-I
Teaching
Methods
Languag
e-II
Feed
Back
from
Princip
al
No Of
Student
s
1 Navdeep H.S.
School Sehore
20 English/Hind
i/ Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 17
2 St. Mary’s
Residential H.S.
20 English/Hind
i/ Sanskrit
Social
study/
Good 17
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 53
School Sehore Science/
Math
3 Pratibha
convent H.S.
School
20 English/Hind
i/ Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 17
4 Shidharth
School Sehore
20 English/Hind
i/ Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 17
5 Maharanaprat
ap Sehore
20 English/Hind
i/ Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 17
6 Sanshkrit pub.
Acd. School
Sehore
20 English/Hind
i/ Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 15
Additional Information to be provided by Institutions opting for Re-
accreditation / Re-assessment
1. What are the main evaluative observations/suggestions made in the
first assessment report with reference to Curricular aspects and how
have they been acted upon?
2. What are the major quality sustenance and enhancement measures
undertaken by the institution since the previous assessment and
accreditation.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 54
Criterion II: Teaching-Learning and Evaluation
2.1 Admission Process and Student Profile
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION IN B.Ed.:
1. 50% marks at graduation level for General category students & 45% for
reservation category.
2. 75% seats for M.P. quota, 25% for out of state quota
3. Reservation as per Govt. norms SC-16%,ST-20%, OBC-14% other reservation
as per M.P. govt. rule.
Total No. of Seats- B.Ed. 100
Document in B.Ed. Admission :
1.10th marksheet ,
2.12th Marksheet,
3.Graduation & Post Graduation,
4.T.C. ,
5.Domicile,
6.Cast certificate,
7.Gap Certificate,
8.Three photograph,
9. Three postcard ,
2.2 Catering to Diverse Needs:
Institution given to achievement realized and the specific means by which these
are to be attained as a result of the school activities engaged in the learning
development and teaching process provide. The Institute provide motivate B.Ed
Student learning encouragement for teaching & learning & Maximum
opportunities given to in co curriculum activities.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 55
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process:
LIBRARY:
The institutes library is a rich resource, providing multifactor services
and facilities to meet the growing requirements of the education world.
The institute has a well equipped library with sufficient seating capacity.
The library has a meticulously chosen selection of more than 3500 books. The
library has text and reference books on a variety of subjects- literature, B.Ed.
Books.
COMPUTERIEZ LIBRARY:
We have a well furnished library with computerized cataloging of more than
3500 reference books. The library also subscribes national and international
journals and periodicals to deep students abreast on the latest developments in
various disciplines on technical as well as general awareness field.
The institution engage students in active learning training of B.Ed
teacher necessity microteaching skills, teachers used the simulation behavior
and used the all activities in teacher molding role all microteaching base on
feedback and interaction analysis B.Ed teacher used the in class teaching time
Video tape recorder (VTR) Closed circuit television, sound tape recorder ,
Movie film, one way glasses, coding strumpet for changes in student behavior
teacher use the introducing, demonstrating, citing, hypothesizing , reporting,
conjecturing , confirming, explaining questioning elaborating etc. teacher
clewed the indusial project learning activities adopted by the institution self
management of the knowledge the skill development by the students teacher
used the different model of teaching used in the class time then mole chart,
impacted are very effective learning the teaching time these method of used
METHOLOGY:
Learning by Doing
Play way method
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 56
Observation method
Story telling method
Field trip method
Picture and model method
Microteaching time teacher used the 22 teaching skills used and 20
microteaching plan in 10 to 15 min. taken and lesson plan total 40 no. teacher
may use in the classroom technical skills are specific instructional techniques
also they represent an analysis of the teaching process into relatively discrete
components that can be used in different combination in the continuous flow of
the teachers performance microteaching technique for developing teaching
skills teacher agree the all skills list the skills practiced and number of lesson
given by each students per skills. Name of the list of the skills
Writing instructional objectives
Set induction
Fluency in questioning
Probing questions
Higher order
Divergent question
Silence non verbal clues
Explaining
Lustrating with examples
Lecturing
Use of black board
Use of A V aids
Completeness of communication
Pacing the lesson
Reinforcement
Increasing pupil participation
Stimulus variation
Recognizing attending behavior
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 57
Achieving closure
Giving assignment
Class management
Practice teaching in school two lessons per students given to per day and lesson
plan observed by school institution head & B.Ed Prof,. & college head
2.4 Teacher Quality:
Practice teaching visit in the school:
S.No Name of
teaching
School
No. of
Lesion
Plan
Teaching
Methods
Language-I
Teaching
Methods
Language-
II
Feed
Back
from
Principal
No Of
Students
1 Navdeep
H.S.
School
Sehore
20 English/Hindi/
Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 25
2 St. Mary’s
Residential
H.S.
School
Sehore
20 English/Hindi/
Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 25
3 Pratibha
convent
H.S.
School
20 English/Hindi/
Sanskrit
Social
study/
Science/
Math
Good 25
4 Shidharth
School
20 English/Hindi/
Sanskrit
Social
study/
Good 25
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 58
Sehore Science/
Math
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms:
SCHEME OF EVALUATION:
Various assessment internal assessment any five – 40 marks
Section -A
S.No Group Paper Total
1 Teacher in emerging Indian society I 08
2 Development of learner and teaching
learning process
II 08
3 Problems and development of
education system in India
III 08
4 Essentials of educational technology
and management
IV 08
5 Special Methods of teaching Subject
I English,Hindi, Sanskrit
V 08
6 Special Methods of teaching Subject
II socialstudy, Science, Math
VI ----
7 Additional specialization VIII -----
Total 40
Part-I Section -B
S.No Group Paper Total
Max Min
1 Teacher in emerging Indian society I 100 36
2 Development of learner and teaching
learning process
II 100 36
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 59
3 Problems and development of
education system in India
III 100 36
4 Essentials of educational technology
and management
IV 100 36
5 Special Methods of teaching Subject
I English,Hindi, Sanskrit
V 100 36
6 Special Methods of teaching Subject
II socialstudy, Science, Math
VI 100 36
7 Additional specialization VIII 100 36
Total 700
Part-II External
S.No Group Max Min Evaluation
1 Teaching of Subject-I 50 20 Internal
2 Teaching of Subject-II 50 20 Internal
3 Criticism Lesson 20 10 Internal
4 Assignment Each paper of
10 marks
70 28 Internal
5 Final lesson in Subject I 50 20 3int+3Ext.
6 Final lesson in Subject II 50 20 3int+3Ext.
7 Work Experience I
Work Experience II/
Enviroment education
25
25
10
10
Int.+ Ext.
Int.+ Ext.
8 Working with community /
Social Services
10 4 Internal
9 Psychlogy Experiments 50 20 Int.+ Ext.
Total 400
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 60
ICT as larnining resources computer, internet, teaching aids, software,
CDs, Vidio recourses Teaching aid and other ICT material provide for B.Ed.
students.
Demo classes observation, teaching , visit in the school for teaching lesson plan
No 40, Microteaching plan No 20
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 61
Criterion III: Research, Consultancy and Extension
3.5 Faculty activities
Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education faculty engaged in the
school in teaching time 40 lesson plan. Teaching Faculty member
collaborate with school in activities.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 62
Criterion IV: Infrastructure and Learning Resources
4.1 Physical Facilities
Physical infrastructure of the sri satya sai institute:
Modern lecture halls
Modern tutorial rooms
Modern conference halls
Well equipped laboratories
Computer lab provides full day internet facility
Separate hostel for boys and girls
Canteen facility with necessary stationery and many other things.
Sport ground and indoor games
In a single sight campuses away from pollution free surrounding. Our institute
provides individual computers with latest internet facility to each and every
students.
We also conduct classes for all round development of the students this includes
Class for improving communication skill & personality development
CLASS ROOM:
The college has spacious, well ventilated and nicely famished classrooms. So
that student can remain comfortable and at ease while studying.
LABORATORY:
Well equipped laboratory for B.Ed. students. It also assists students in
improving teaching technologies and over all develops learning environment.
Identification & sharing good provide with various constituents of the Institute.
Educational Technology & Computer Lab: Lab equipped with high
quality computers OHP and LCD , for the development of technically
skilled teachers Sri satya sai Institute of Teacher education facilitates
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 63
each and every teacher trainees with knowledge of computers . the
educational CD’s Video-taps, Audio cassettes and latest version of
encyclopedias are also available in educational technology lab. the well
equipped language lab and internet facility is also available in Sri satya
sai Institute of Teacher education.
Psychology Lab: Well equipped psychology lab is especially designed
with the aim to evaluate the ability and aptitude of students. The lab
consists of standard apparatuses related to practical aspects of
psychology in order to enhance the E.Q. and I.Q. level and to establish
personality dimensions of students.
Work Experience Lab: To develop self dependence ands self
confidence Sri satya sai Institute of Teacher education is facilitating
teacher trainees with professional skills of handicraft like- book binding,
soft toys making, ceramic work, clay arts, music and gardening etc.
Science Lab: The Sri satya sai Institute of Teacher education has well
equipped physics, chemistry and biology labs, guidance and relative
apparatuses are provided to the teacher trainees during practice teaching
which make the teacher trainers confident and well skilled in teaching.
Sports and Cultural Activities: For all round skilled development of
the teacher trainees different cultural and sport activities are organized.
The campus has football ground, basketball, volleyball and badminton
court, cricket pitch and arrangement for several indoor games like table
tennis, carom and chess etc.
PERSONALITY DEVELOPMET:
Through our group discussion cell and personality development class we
sharpen students introvert and extrovert personality. Students when face the outer
would of competitions are fully confident and competent to face the interviews of the
leading companies and challenges of the future life. Special care is taken for overall
development of the students mainly through communicating skill group discussion,
facing personal intermarries and right attitude toward life.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 64
Maintenance of Infrastructure:
Expenditure Statement :
S.No Planning Expenditure
2012-13
2011-
12
2010-
11
2009-
10
2008-
09
1 Salary (Teaching
& Non Teaching )
77% 74% 73% 71% 70%
2 Purchase of
Library Book
5% 5% 5% 4% 4%
3 Telephone,
Electricity, Water,
news paper,
Magazine etc.
6% 4% 4% 3% 3%
4 Building
Maintenance,
Sport,
Hostel,Students
amenities etc.
2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
5 Maintenance of
equipment,
teaching aids,
Affiliation Fee etc.
4% 4% 4% 4% 4%
6 Seminars,
conferences,
faculty
5% 5% 5% 4% 4%
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 65
development
programmes.,
faculty exchange ,
office etc.
7 Travel 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
4.3 Library as a Learning Resource
LIBRARY:
The institutes library is a rich resource, providing multifactor services and facilities to
meet the growing requirements of the education world.
The institute has a well equipped library with sufficient seating capacity. The library
has a meticulously chosen selection of more than 3500 books. The library has text and
reference books on a variety of subjects- literature, B.Ed. Books.
COMPUTERIEZ LIBRARY:
We have a well furnished library with computerized cataloging of more than 3500
reference books. The library also subscribes national and international journals and
periodicals to deep students abreast on the latest developments in various disciplines on
technical as well as general awareness field.
The institution engage students in active learning training of B.Ed teacher necessity
microteaching skills, teachers used the simulation behavior and used the all activities in
teacher molding role all microteaching base on feedback and interaction analysis B.Ed
teacher used the in class teaching time Video tape recorder (VTR) Closed circuit
television, sound tape recorder , Movie film, one way glasses, coding strumpet for
changes in student behavior teacher use the introducing, demonstrating, citing,
hypothesizing , reporting, conjecturing , confirming, explaining questioning elaborating
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 66
etc. teacher clewed the indusial project learning activities adopted by the institution self
management of the knowledge the skill development by the students teacher used the
different model of teaching used in the class time then mole chart, impacted are very
effective learning the teaching time these method of used
4.4 ICT as Learning Resource
COMPUTER LAB:
The college has excellent and sophisticated computer labs having TFT-LCD
screen, C2D 3.0 GHz based WIPRO/HCL branded computer. All the systems, labs and
library are connected through LAN using structure networking.
4.5 Other Facilities
TRAINING AND PLACEMENT:
All academic and soft skill development pursuits are aimed at preparation ,
participation and selection of students at campus placement in reputed schools.
We have a central training and placement cell, headed by dynamic and energetic
officials who take care of all related activities.
Students are exposed to live professional situations through industry visit,
summer training guest lectures by eminent and experienced professionals from
experts as guide for project work this relationship is bound to attract a wide
variety of employees enabling high level of campus selections and placement
for students.
CLASS ROOM:
The college has spacious, well ventilated and nicely famished classrooms. So
that student can remain comfortable and at ease while studying.
CANTEEN AND TRANSPORTATION:
A well-managed and hygienic canteen in institute premises provides
refreshment to the students. Also provides the students exclusive bus facilities to pick-
n-drop from various locations in the city.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 67
Seminars & Gust Lecturer: are conducted in collaboration with the B.Ed. Students in
Sri Satya Sai Institute.
SPECIAL FACILITIES:
Spacious Classrooms
Well equipped laboratories
Interactive learning environment
Personality development classes
Indoor sports, gymnasium
Bus facility
Cafeteria
Hostels
Yoga room
4.6 Best Practices in Infrastructure and Learning Resources
Faculty used the different model according to lesson plan and also used the
projector, Slid, educational video, tape recorder ect
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 68
Criterion V: Student Support and Progression
5.1 Student Progression
Counseling Guidance Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
1. Mrs. Neelam Khare Principal
2. Mr. Dheeraj Shinde Lecturer
3. Mrs. Neelam Mishra Prof.
Monitoring Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education :
1. Mrs. Neelam Khare Principal
2. Mr. Rishikesh Yadav Lecturer
3. Mr. Beerbal Umaria Lecuter
Financial Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
1. Mr. Ashfak Shidheki CA
2. Mrs. Suman Accountant
Sport Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education :
1. Mr. Vikas Kumar Sport Incharge
2. Mr. Rishikesh Yadav Lecturer
Internal Quality Insurance Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
1.
In teaching time B.Ed. Students teacher clacked the observation file and Questionnaire
in submit the project assiement all so. Appropriate procedure to the lesson teaching
time teacher
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 69
CULTURAL ACTIVITY:
Various curricular and co-curricular activities are planned and organized like
seminars and workshops, faculty development program, group discussion,
entrepreneurship, counseling communication skills, annual function and sports meet.
We have very good sports grounds where students play, cricket, football, volleyball and
indoor games have also been arranged.
Institute Academic Performance result :
Year No of
Student
s
Category First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Fail
2010 37 Gen 32 4 1
11 OBC 9 2
12 SC 8 2 2
15 ST 13 1 1
25 ALL
India
19 3 3
100
Year No of
Student
s
Category First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Fail
2011 37 Gen 30 2 2 3
11 OBC 9 1 1
12 SC 7 2 1 2
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 70
15 ST 11 1 2 1
25 ALL
India
17 5 3
100
Year No of
Student
s
Category First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Fail
2012 37 Gen 33 1 3
11 OBC 7 2 2
12 SC 8 2 2
15 ST 11 2 2
25 ALL
India
13 3 6 3
100
5.2 Student Support
Students Activities in College Magazine:
S.No Name of Students Class Articles
1 Arpita Thakur B.Ed. National Policy
2 Banwari lal B.Ed. Life
3 Anil Verma B.Ed. Attitude
4 Aruna Mishra B.Ed. Friendship
5 Sunita B.Ed. Personality development
6 Sanjay Tamoliya B.Ed. Great leader of philosophy
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 71
7 Dolly Verma B.Ed. f’k{kk lcls mRe fe=
8 Babita Jogi B.Ed. ,d iasM nsrk gS nks yksxks dks ftanxh
9 Anjana Yadav B.Ed. VSxksaj ds n’kZu dh ,d >yd
10 Alam Singh B.Ed. Importance of the time
No. of Elect Students:
S.No Name of Students
1 Arpita Thakur
2 Banwari lal
3 Anil Verma
4 Aruna Mishra
5 Sunita
6 Sanjay Tamoliya
7 Dolly Verma
8 Babita Jogi
9 Anjana Yadav
Alumni Meet:
Since its inception over 100 B.Ed. training students form sri satya sai
institute of teacher education various discipline including teaching. The
number of students who complete B.Ed degree is over 80 the rest
obtained 20 teachers in administration these alumni today work as
headmistress senior teacher etc. they have contributed significantly in the
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 72
building off the nation theses 100 alumni teachers from sri satya sai
institute of teacher education sehore alumni association with the
objective of providing a platform for networking amongst themselves,
and between the alumni sri satya sai institute of teacher education. They
do so by organizing various professional, social and cultural activities
year 2010,2011,2012 . other than organizing the annual general body
meeting sports events and picnics, the alumni association organizes
lectures by distinguished speakers and panel discussions on topics of
current interest to its members. More recently the alumni association has
got involved with career counseling for current students at sri satya sai
institute of teacher education.
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMES:
Education programme is also a major part SSS Inst. Of Teacher Education
group of institutes located at Sehore and includes all ingredients for excellence
for achieving academic perfection. The institute is approved by NCTE and
govt. of Higher Education and affiliated to Barkatullh University, Bhopal, the
campus environment is excellent for studies and all around development of
students. Because the role of a teacher in a democratic system of education is
very crucial, they have to act as teachers to develop physical, mental, social,
emotional, intellectual and aesthetic aspects i.e. total personality of the
students. The college has tie-up with other colleges & schools to provide
training to students keeping the motto as A teacher can never truly teach
unless he is still learning himself. A lamp can never light another lamp unless it
continues to burn its own flame.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 73
Institute leader ship core value:
: Council of students : No of left students Sri satya sai Institute of teacher
education council is formed in college responsibility are nominated for
different activities for each students academic session 2010,2011,2012
nominated class representatives were is as under.
Details of activities committee organize students name :
S.no Name of Students Name of the
committee
1 1.Arpita Thakur
2. Banwari Lal
3. Anajana Yadav
Sports
2 1.Dolly Verma
2.Arti sen
3. Alam singh
Discipline
3 1.Babita Jogi
2. Sunita
3. Md. Jahagir Alam
Cultural Co-
Curallar Activities
4 1.Rahul
2.Usha Indoria
3. Archana
Program
Coordinator
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 74
Education Tour:
S.No Name of the
Place
Educational
Tour Date
1 Science center
Bhopal
10 July 2013
2 Sanchi, Bhojpur 15.09.2013
Website: www.sssist.in
SSS Institute of Teacher's Education
B.Ed.
TIME - TABLE (SESSION -2012-13)
Periods Days
Prayer
Vandana
10.00
to
10.40
10.40
to
11.20
11.20
to
12.00
12.00
to
12.45
12.45
to 1.25
1.25
to
2.05
2.05
to
2.45
2.45 to
3.30
MONDAY I II III
LUNCH
MI IV VII
LIBRA
RY
TUESDAY II VII IV MI III I
WEDNESDAY III II I MI IV VII
THURSDAY III IV II MII VII I
FRIDAY I III VII MII IV II
SATURDAY I VII III MIII II IV
Paper-I,V,VII Usha
Paper-III& Maths Dhiraj Shinde
Paper-V &VI ( H/Sans.) Preeti Saxena
Paper-II& IV Rishikesh Yadav
Social St. & So. Sc. Neelam Khare
MI English Neelam Khare
Gen. science Manisha Bhargava
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 75
Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education
Academic Calendar : 2011-12
d{kk,a izkjaHk ,oa vkarfjd ewU;kadu tuojh uoEcj
ijh{kk iwoZ rS;kjh uoEcj fnlEcj
vfrfjDr d{kk,a 50izfr’kr ls de mifLFkfr okys
Nk=kas dks fu;ekuqlkj
vkarfjd ijh{kk flrEcj vDVwoj
izks;ksfxd ijh{kk uoEcj
vlkbesV] izkstsDV vxLr flrEcj
okf"kZd ijh{kk fnlEcj
ijh{kk ifj.kke laHkkfor vafre
frfFk
fnlEcj& tuojh
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 76
5.3 Student Activities
Details of the activities organize Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
S.No. Activities Date
1 New year calibration 01.01.2011
2 Independence Day 15.08.2011
3 Teacher Day(Dr. Radhakrishanan) 05.09.2011
4 Gandhi Jayanti 02.10.2011
5 Bal Divas 14.11.2011
6 Republic Day 26.01.2011
7 Welcome of B.Ed Student 27.02.2011
8 Firewall of B.Ed. Student T. Teacher 05.12.2011
9 Lecturer of Expert 14.09.2011
10 Alumni Meet 28.09.2011
11 Picnic Education tore 10.04.2011
12 Blood Donation camp 04.10.2011
13 Seminar Educational
Detail of the achievement of the students rewarded :
S.No. Name of Students Competition Position
1 1.Aarti Yadav
2.Akansha Gupta
Quiz I
II
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 77
3.Ankita Gupta
4.Anupama Duebey
III
IV
2 1.Preeti Jain
2. Priya Saxena
3. Priyanka Kumari
Rangoli I
II
III
3 1.Priyanka Namdev
2.Preeti Jain
3. Aarti Yadav
Mehdi I
II
III
4 1.Ranjana Tiwari
2.Sanjay singh
3. Uday Singh
Devated I
II
III
5 1.Ankita Gupta
2. Arvind Bais
3. Beerbal Pamrma
Speech I
II
III
6 1.Bharti verma
2. Bhanu pratap singh
3. Virendra Singh
Assay Writing I
II
III
7 1.Uday singh
2.Vijay Kumar Sen
3.Rajni Mahoviya
Fock Song I
II
III
8 1.Rambabu Malviya
2.Priyanka Namved
3. Ravikant
Daring/
Painting
I
II
III
9 1.Rajkumar Malviya
2.Pradeep Nagar
3.Pooja Paniya
Model I
II
III
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 78
Detail of the achievement of the students rewarded 2011-12 :
S.No. Name of Students Competition Position
1 1.Puja Vyas
2.Kshama Sharma
3.Archana Deshmukh
Quiz I
II
III
2 1.Pinky Maheswari
2. Swati Verma
3. Urmila Shivhare
Rangoli I
II
III
3 1.Babita Padidar
2.Preeti
3. Meena Diwan
Mehdi I
II
III
4 1. Madhu rathoure
2.Vinod Kumar
3. Komal Bai
Devated I
II
III
5 1.Rajkumari Bagwan
2. Surendra Singh
3. Farhat parveen
Speech I
II
III
6 1.Ritesh dharwa
2. Shayam Khan
3. Babita Mewada
Assay Writing I
II
III
7 1.Gayatri Kushwaha
2.Priya Rathoure
3.Neha soni
Fock Song I
II
III
8 1.Ravikant Bajpai
2.Arti Soni
3. Shobha Raghuwanshi
Daring/
Painting
I
II
III
9 1.Vijaylaxmi
2.Rahul Kumar
3. Rekha Mewada
Model I
II
III
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 79
Detail of the achievement of the students rewarded 2012-13 :
S.No. Name of Students Competition Position
1 1.Alam Singh
2.Anil verma
3.Anjana yadav
Quiz I
II
III
2 1.Archna Sharma
2. Arpita Thakur
3. Aruna Mishra
Rangoli I
II
III
3 1.Babita Jogi
2.Aruna Mishara
3. Dolly Verma
Mehdi I
II
III
4 1.Banwari lal Ahirwar
2.Bhagwati Chandwani
3. Bhajan Lal
Devated I
II
III
5 1.Divya Upadhyay
2. Dolly Verma
3. Kriti Bhargara
Speech I
II
III
6 1.Padma Parmar
2. Pragya Chouhan
3. Preeti Kaushik
Assay Writing I
II
III
7 1.Preeti Namdev
2.Rachna Malviya
3.Rajendra Prasad Goyal
Fock Song I
II
III
8 1.Rajesh Bharti
2.Reena nagar
3. Reena Thakur
Daring/
Painting
I
II
III
9 1.Sanjay Tamoliya
2.Shikha choursiya
3.Sunita
Model I
II
III
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 80
Education Empowerment & excellence:
Education is the tool that not only empowers the mind, but also helps one reach
great heights of excellence. The entire process of learning lays stress on enabling the
individual to put his potentials to optimal use. The human mind was made to be
groomed for welfare of world at large. In this context it will not be an exaggeration to
state that in absence of education a person is incomplete. Education marks man a right
thinker and a correct decision- marker.
At Sri satya sai Institute of Teacher education we encourage our students to
learn not only to earn a B.Ed , but to augment their knowledge on various subjects.
Each person has a different level of understanding that is way has experts in various
fields to help students explore the best in themselves. We prefer interactive learning
over conventional methods of B.Ed. students imparting education as is the interactive
learning that infuses a greater level of comprehension and an improved retention of
knowledge in students our B.Ed college Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education
assigns greatest importance to developing right skills by making students enthusiastic
learners.
Education plays a very important role in life usually education and knowledge
sri satya sai instate of teacher education I believe education is a mean to gain
knowledge and effectively putting it to use. It is important that education is imparted
with global standards and is also aimed at social cultural- economic development of the
students and faculties as well. It is even more important that educational institutes
provide with opportunities and environment that contributes towards multi-level
development. We believe that the real success is when each and every associate feels
benefited with the association at we are striving to live up to this philosophy.
Skills: The college offers several courses and all the courses place profound emphasis
on practical experience for which efforts are put to ensure that the students are not only
technically skilled but also have great communication skills to suit to the increasing
demand of qualified B.Ed. teachers.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 81
Placement : To prepare and orient the students the process of training and placement at
sri satya sai instate of teacher education is handled by the training and placement
department headed who coordinates the relevant activities with departmental heads and
students representatives. The TPO would get guidance from the director corporate HR
to leverage from corporate expertise.
This department takes initiatives for developing right attitudes, soft skills,
analytical capabilities and exposing them to the nuances of economic and financial
aspects related to their professional careers.
Teacher – Guardian Scheme: The institute follows the teacher- guardian scheme.
This system proves beneficial in establishing healthy relationship between the pupils
and teachers. The guide the students and provide as interface between parents students
and college management.
Individual Performance: Personal attention approach strict adherence to teacher
student ratio of performance mapping programme personal guiding sessions.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 82
Criterion VI: Governance and Leadership
6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
MISSION:
Our team with the motto “SATAY MEV JAYATE” together workd towards the
mission to evolve, develop and implement dynamic learning system to equip
professionals with conscience commitment to excellence and courage to face business
challenges. To provide wholesome, learning & most professional education of highest
order to the students of SSS Inst. Of Teacher Education.
VISION:
To motivate and mould young management trainees into world class
professionals who will excel in their fields and efficiently to meet the challenges of the
dynamic global scenario.
What are the institution’s stated purpose, vision, mission and values? How are
they made known to the various stakeholders?
Counseling Guidance Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
4. Mrs. Neelam Khare Principal
5. Mr. Dheeraj Shinde Lecturer
6. Mrs. Neelam Mishra Prof.
Monitoring Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education :
4. Mrs. Neelam Khare Principal
5. Mr. Rishikesh Yadav Lecturer
6. Mr. Beerbal Umaria Lecuter
Financial Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 83
3. Mr. Ashfak Shidheki CA
4. Mrs. Suman Accountant
Sport Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education :
3. Mr. Vikas Kumar Sport Incharge
4. Mr. Rishikesh Yadav Lecturer
Internal Quality Insurance Cell Sri satya sai Institute of teacher education:
In teaching time B.Ed. Students teacher clacked the observation file and Questionnaire
in submit the project assiement all so. Appropriate procedure to the lesson teaching
time teacher
STRENGHTHS:
Leadership by renowned scientist technocrats
Experienced & trained faculties, dedicated to work as a team and go forward for
the challenges as fraternity.
Rigorous adherence to NCTE norms and guidelines, implementation of BU
curriculum and students certification system.
Digital library
Separate hostel facilities for boy & girls
Provinces with in municipal corporation
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 84
6.3 Strategy Development and Deployment
MISSION:
Our team with the motto “SATAY MEV JAYATE” together workd towards the
mission to evolve, develop and implement dynamic learning system to equip
professionals with conscience commitment to excellence and courage to face business
challenges. To provide wholesome, learning & most professional education of highest
order to the students of SSS Inst. Of Teacher Education.
VISION:
To motivate and mould young management trainees into world class
professionals who will excel in their fields and efficiently to meet the challenges of the
dynamic global scenario.
What are the institution’s stated purpose, vision, mission and values? How are
they made known to the various stakeholders?
6.5 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
Expenditure Statement :
S.No Planning Expenditure
%
1 Salary (Teaching & Non
Teaching )
77%
2 Purchase of Library Book 5%
3 Telephone, Electricity,
Water, new paper,
Magazine etc.
6%
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 85
4 Building Maintenance,
Sport, Hostel,Student
amenities etc.
2%
5 Maintenance of equipment,
teaching aids, Affiliation
Fee etc.
4%
6 Seminars, conferences,
faculty development prog.,
faculty exchange , office
etc.
5%
7 Travel 1%
6. 6 Best practices in Governance and Leadership
Society Advisory council:
S.No Name Designation Retired honorable
person
1 Mr. P.D. Soni Principal Govt. PG College
2 Dr. G. R. Selokar Principal Retired
Council of Students in sri satya sai institute of teacher education : council of students
formed in sri satya sai institute of teacher education but all responsibility are culture
activity, co-circular activity committees are nominated for each students. Academic
session 2010-11. Provide the loan facility & medical facility and other welfare scheme
provide by institution management.
Manual for Self – appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 86
Criterion VII: Innovative Practices
7. 1 Internal Quality Assurance System
Inclusive Practices
7. 3 Stakeholder Relationships
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 106
Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
Admission andOrientation
Theory
Tutorials/Seminars
Sessional Work– Tests &AssignmentsPractical Work
Preparation ofInternship:Demonstration/ Observationof lessons/micro teaching/simulationsPracticeTeaching/InternshipCo-curricularActivities
Working withcommunity/project workEnd-TermExamination
Note: A week is of six working days and a day is of six clock hoursThe table should cover the entire academic session and may be extended as per the requirement
Mapping of Academic Activities of the Institution
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 107
D. Declaration by the Head of the Institution
I certify that that the data included in this Self-Appraisal Report (SAR) are true to the best
of my knowledge.
This SAR is prepared by the institution after internal discussions, and No part thereof has
been outsourced.
I am aware that the Peer team will validate the information provided in this SAR duringthe peer team visit.
Signature of the Head of the institutionwith seal:
Place:
Date:
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 108
Section C: Appendices
1. Sample Questionnaires for feedback from Students
2. Sample formats for Teacher appraisal Reports
3. Value Framework for Assessment of Higher Education Institution and
Suggested Parameters
4. Documents to be annexed with the Self-appraisal Report
5. Data Sheet to record the “Best Practice”
6. Glossary
7. Abbreviations
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 109
Appendix 1: Sample Questionnaires forFeedback from Students
A Sample suggestive questionnaire to obtain feedback from students is givenin this Appendix. As the sample questionnaires are framed for institutionscatering to liberal Arts and Science streams it is advised that the TEI’s evolvesuitable questionnaires as for the programme requirements. Thedata/information collected through such questionnaire , analysed andappropriately used is expected to form an important input for qualityenhancement of the institution.
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 110
Sample Questionnaires for Feedback from StudentsAffiliated / Constituent Colleges
Questionnaire No. 1College XYZ
Programme:
Department: Semester/Term/Year:
Students are required to rate the courses on the following attributes using the 4 -point scaleshown. The format given is for one course. Do the same for other courses on separate page.
4.00 3.00 2.00 1.50 0.0A B C D
Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Course-I
ParametersA
Very GoodB
GoodC
SatisfactoryD
Unsatisfactory
1. Depth of the course contentincluding project work if any
2. Extent of coverage of course
3. Applicability/relevance to real lifesituations
4. Learning value (in terms ofknowledge, concepts, manualskills, analytical abilities andbroadening perspectives)
5. Clarity and relevance of textualreading material
6. Relevance of additional sourcematerial (Library)
7. Extent of effort required bystudents
8. Overall rating
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
Questionnaire No. 2
College XYZ
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 111
Student Feedback on Teachers
Department : Semester/Term/Year :Please rate the teacher on the following attributes using the 4 -point scale shown
4.00 3.00 2.00 1.50 0.0A B C D
Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Name of the Teacher:
ParametersA
VeryGood
BGood
CSatisfactory
DUnsatisfactory
1. Knowledge base of the teacher (asperceived by you) (Historical places ofIndia)
2. Communication Skills (in terms ofarticulation and comprehensibility)
3. Sincerity / Commitment of the teacher4. Interest generated by the teacher5. Ability to integrate course material with
environment/other issues, to provide abroader perspective
6. Ability to integrate content with othercourses
7. Accessibility of the teacher in and out ofthe class (includes availability of theteacher to motivate further study anddiscussion outside class)
8. Ability to design quizzes /Tests/assignments / examinations andprojects to evaluate studentsunderstanding of the course
9. Provision of sufficient time for feedback10. Overall rating
4.00
4.00
4.004.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 112
Questionnaire No. 3College XYZ
Students’ overall Evaluation of the programme and Teaching(To be filled only after the course results are declared)
Department : Course :
Teacher : Year :
Your responses will be seen only after your course results have been finalised andrecorded.
The information will be used only for the improvement of the course and teaching infuture.
You need not disclose your name if you do not wish to.
You may tick more than one answer to a question to the extent that they do notcontradict each other.
1. The syllabus of each course was
a) adequate b) inadequatec) challenging d) dull
2. Background for benefiting from the course wasa) more than adequate b) adequatec) inadequate d) cannot say
3. Was the course easy or difficult to understand?a) easy b) manageablec) difficult d) very difficult
4. How much of the syllabus was covered in the class?a) 85 to 100% b) 70 to 85%c) 55 to 70% d) less than 55%
5. What is your opinion about the library material and facilities for the course?a) more than adequate b) adequatec) inadequate d) very poor
6. To what extent were you able to get material for the prescribed readings?a) Easily b) with some difficultyc) not available at all d) with great difficulty
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 113
7. How well did the teacher prepare for the classes?a) thoroughly b) satisfactorilyc) poorly d) indifferently
8. How well was the teacher able to communicate?a) Always effective b) sometimes effectivec) Just satisfactorily d) generally ineffective
9. How far the teacher encourages student participation in class?a) mostly yes b) sometimesc) not at all d) always
10. If yes, which of the following methods were used?a) Encouraged to raise questions b) get involved in discussion in classc) encourage discussion outside class d) did not encourage
11. How helpful was the teacher in advising?a) Very helpful b) sometimes helpfulc) not at all helpful d) did not advise
12. The teacher’s approach can best be described asa) Always courteous b) sometimes rudec) always indifferent d) cannot say
13. Internal assessment wasa) Always fair b) sometimes unfairc) Usually unfair d) sometimes fair
14. What effect do you think the internal assessment will have on your course grade?a) Helps to improve b) discouragingc) no special effect d) sometimes effective
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 114
15. How often did the teacher provide feedback on your performance?a) Regularly/in time b) with helpful commentc) often/ late d) without any comments
16. Were your assignments discussed with you?a) Yes, fully b) yes, partlyc) not discussed at all d) sometimes discussed
17. Were you provided with a course contributory lecture too at the beginning?a) Yes b) no
If yes, was it helpful?a) Yes b) no
18. If you have other comments to offer on the course and suggestions for the teacher youmay do so in the space given below or on a separate sheet.
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 115
AAppppeennddiixx-- 22:: SSaammppllee ffoorrmmaattss ffoorr TTeeaacchheerr aapppprraaiissaall RReeppoorrttss
(Source: UGC)Format- 1
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORT
FOR SELF APPRAISAL OF TEACHERS
i) General Information
a) Name : Mrs Neelam Khare
b) Address (Residential) : Lalghati Bhopal Ph. No. :9165603848
c) Designation : Principal
d) Department : Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education (B.Ed.)
e) Date of Birth : 09.12.1953
f) Area of Specialization : M.Ed. (R.C.E.)
A) Academic QualificationsExam Passed Board/
UniversitySubjects Year Division/Grade
Merit etc.
Higher Secondary orPre-degree
MP Art 1969 II
Bachelor’s Degree(s)
BU Art 1972 I
Master’s Degree (s) BU Art 1978 II
Research Degree (s) RCE M.Ed.
specializ
ation in
Teacher
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 116
Educatio
n & work
values in
rural &
urban
area
comparat
ive
studies
Other Diploma /Certificates etc.* Teachers already in employment at the time of introduction of the scheme and for new entrants at the
time of joining of the institution.
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 117
ii) Research Experience & Training
Research Stage Title of work/Theses University where thework was carried out
M.Phil or equivalent
Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral
Publications (give a listseparately)
Research Guidance (givenames of studentsguided successfully)
Training (please specify)
B) Research Projects carried out
Title of theProject
Name of thefunding Agency
Duration Remarks
C) Seminars, Conferences, Symposia Workshops etc. attended
Name of the Seminar/Conference/Symposia Workshop,etc.
Name of the Sponsoring Agency Place and Date
ConferenceCarrier Society
Bhopal 1978
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 118
iii) Teaching Experience
Courses Taught Name of theUniversity/ College /
Institution
Duration
iv ) U.G.(B.A./B.Sc., etc. Pass)(B.A./B.Sc. etc. Hons.)
BU 30 years
v) P.G.(M.A./ M.Sc., etc.)
vi) M.Philvii) Any other
Total Teaching Experience : _______________30 Years__________________________
a) Under-graduate (Pass) : __________________.............._________________________
b) Under-graduate (Hons): ___________________..............._______________________
c) Post-graduate : ______________________..............______________________
viii) Innovations/Contributions in Teaching
a) Design of Curriculum
b) Teaching methods
c) Laboratory experiments
d) Evaluation methods
e) Preparation of resource materialIncluding books, reading materials,Laboratory manuals etc.
f) Remedial Teaching / Student Counseling (academic)
g) Any Other
ix) Extension Work/Community Service
a) Please give a short account of your contribution to:
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 119
i) Community worksuch as values of National Integration,secularism, democracy, socialism, humanism, peace,scientific temper, flood or drought relief, small family norms etc.
ii) National Literacy Mission: Adult education (Social Welfare Department )Bal Kalyanprewar & priyojana
b) Positions held/Leadership role played in organizations linked with ExtensionWork and National Service Scheme (NSS), or NCC or any other similar activityParticipated in NCC
D. Participation in Corporate Life:
Please give a short account of your contribution to :
a) College/University/Institution
b) Co-curricular Activities
Extra –Curricular Activities:1. Dance & Drama Ist Prize certificate
2. Guidance certificate in games dance & drill certificate
3. NCC certificates of Part one
4. NCC Certificate G part –I CPL Rank annual senior division NCC camp Indore
5. Lazim Dombuel, Drill & Games certificates6. Republic day National Program In charge7. Health Center Prashatri Patra8. Family & chilled welfare ( social welfare Department)9. Govt P G college Member of Janbhagidari Prbandhan Samiti Bareli Dist Reaisen10.In National programmes dist. Raisen member of 20 programme committee member11. Member of shala vikas samiti of Govt. Girls H.S. School bareli Dist. Raisen
c) Enrichment of Campus Life(Hostels, sports, games, cultural activities) Participated in Indore Camp Sport & Cultural
Activities
d) Students Welfare and Discipline
e) Membership/Participation in Bodies/Committeeson Education and National Development
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 120
f) Professional Organization of Teachers.E. (a) Membership of Professional Bodies, Societies etc.
(b) Editorship of Journals
F. Any other information : Exam Supt. In Board Examination
(Signature of the Teacher)
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 121
Format- 2PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORTFOR SELF APPRAISAL OF TEACHERS
A. General Information
a) Name : Mrs Neelam Khare
b) Date of Birth: 09.12.1953
c) Address (Residential) Lalghati Bhopal Ph.No. 9165603848
d) Designation : Principal
e) Department : Sri Satya Sai Institute of Teacher Education (B.Ed.)
f) Area of Specialization : Teacher Education & Social Studies
g) Date of Appointment :Feb 2006
(i) in the institution
(ii) in the present post : Principal
h) Honors Conferred
B. Teaching
(a) Classes Taught
Class Periods
Assigned perweek
**L T/P
(1)
Taught in theyear
L T/P
(2)
Steps taken for theteaching of periodsmissed during absenceor leave
(3)
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 122
i) U.G.(B.A./B.Sc.etc. pass)(B.A./B.Sc.etc.
Hons)
ii) PG(M.A./M.Sc.etc.)
iii) M.Phil
iv) Any other (B.Ed) 03/01/02 45/15/30 Nil
* (To be filled at the end of every academic year)** L=Lecture T=Tutorial P=Practical
b) Regularity and Punctuality
c) Details of course teaching plan, synopses of lecturers, and reading lists supplied tostudents
d) Details of participation in the following:
(i) University Education
(ii) Internal Evaluation
(iii) Paper Setting
(iv) Assessment of Home assignments
(v) Conduct of Examinations
(vi) Evaluation of Dissertation etc.
C. Details of Innovations / Contribution in Teaching, during the year :
Manual for Self – Appraisal of Teacher Education Institutions
NAAC for Quality and Excellence in Higher Education 123
a) Design of curriculum : As per Norms
b) Teaching methods: Psychological & all Education methods used
c) Laboratory experiments: According to curriculum
d) Evaluation methods : All Methods used as per norms
e) Preparation of resource material including books,reading materials, laboratory manuals etc. : All are used
f) Remedial Teaching / Student Counseling (academic)
g) Any other
D. Improvement of Professional Competence:
(a) Details regarding refresher courses/orientation attended, participation in summer schools,workshops, seminars, symposia etc. including open university courses/M.Phil., Ph.D.
F-t-*-
Ht-L-uuuuL-t-bl-1--t-.l-.bul--l--TJ
Eul-LlJLtrk]JkL
MASTER PLAN
THE MANAGERIAL PROCESS OF DEVELIPING, OVER ALL GUIDANCE, TEACHING
LEARN I NG DEVELOPM ENT,.
NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND SPENDED, PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
FACILITY WILL BE DEVEVLOPED
QULAIW REFORMS
SUPPORT FOR NATIONAL WELFARE SCHEMES BY INSTITUTE
EXTENSION TO ALL CIRCRICULAR ACTIVITIES.
*./ /":,'/-
;" $ q:bq ;.,-. >crrY& L"' lt'tt ''i'o'S "t
.u*-i,*,iluiiori"' l;"''*rru {nd F )
7.4 Curricuium Update
COURSES:
Paper (l) Teacher in emerging Indian society
Paper (li) Development of lamer and teaching learning processPaper (lll) Development of education syste* in IndiaPaper(lv) Essentiars of education technorogy and managementPaper (v'& vr) any two schoor subjects to be studied as method paper, these
will be based on the main subjects or the main and one of the ancillary subjects in thecase of graduates' and the sub.iect offered in post graduation shoulcl be the same as ingraduation except in the case of those who have offered the fundamental subjects likeph i losophy,. ps,r.,chology OR M.A. educari on.
Group I
Teaching of
(i) Hindi
(ii) Englis
h
(iii) Sanskr
it
(iv) UrdLr
___= 1
\.A,\['./br Quali4, uncl Excellenc:e in tiighet. Ecltrc,ctrirn 49
IJt-:l;t-uf--TJl-.tl_-l-.t-'.LLl--l_-Lt--uIJt_.t*Lt_-t-.-t-t--L*-t--lrt*-t-
Teaching
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
o1'
Social
Science
Civics
Economi
CS
Geograp
hy
Soc ial
stud ies
Teaching
(i)
of
Life
science
Mathernati
CS
./L/ *j-
u,,*q,fj:m[S*,
Paper (V& VI) Merhodist TeichrrA
Categorl,A Category B
Teaching ol(ii) Science
(iii) Chemist
ry
(iv) Physics
l--
bIJuu,lJ,':-
l--l--f'-uHL*,u,L.LHuLHHLHL
E
Manua! for Self - apprarsal af Teacher Education lnstt{utions
Paper (VII) Elective Subject (any orte o1'the follou'ing)
i. Elementary Education ii. Population Education
Edrication
iv. Aiternbtive Education v. Educational Administration & Management
vi. Educational and mental measurement vii. Physical education
viii. Career information in care er gr,ridance ix. Teaching of values.
Practical Papers:
Field based experience including practice teaching
ii" Co- Curricular activities including physical & health education and work
experience
Ilstitution attempted to provide teaching experiences to the B.Ed students. So
that teaching reflective practice total practice teaching day 40 20 lesson
language and 20lesson method-ll 20lesson plan giver-r by each B.Ed. Sh-nlents .
B.Ed. Book & Author's
iii. E,nvironrnental
50
S.No. Titles Author's
sTrJh-fi qrso i Rru{I d arqelYT fAtqi{
2 .ffiq Rren znr gfrETit \q fd-orq T{{]ril-iT roi{la-) s€qrTq -ilTftq lt.qlq d Riero d qEtrc-d qroeq
4 sfi-qqrn qxfiq qrqtq d ftrc{fi cT qlrl+q/Gqifi erqi
5 s-frqqrq qrso t f*en {w{i-qrs iqr.fr
,6 sf;qqm qT{fiq qlqm d tintt d qft 3{qilG
l ffierT 3f{ qq.rq q-qnT
8 Fel dttT sfr-qryT qr{fr-q lrqrq GT RTqqTf,
o Development of Education s.vstem in lndia Dr. R.S. Pandel'
\.'\.rit lbr Quulin' urd Escellartce in Higher Et{u:crliott
Manual for Self - appraisal of Teae her Education lnstitutians
Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
LLt-uuuf-.uLEL.uuUFHH
Expenditure Statement :
S.N<r Planning Expenditureo/o
1 Salary (Teaching & Non
Teaching )
--,// v/./*
2 Purchase of Library Book \ r.'" lt
.-) Telephone, Electricity,
Water, new paper,
Magazine etc.
6j' ./,
4 Building Maintenance,
Sport, Hostel,Student
amenities etc.
2 in
5 Maintenance of equipment,
teaching aids, Affiliation
Fee etc.
4
6 Seminars, conferences,
faculty development prog.,
faculty exchange , office
etc.
)"'
7 Travel 1
-,r r,lt-'./br QLtdin, uncl Excellence irt t'ligher Edtrrution 92
Manual for self - appraisal of Teacher Education lnstitutions
Ll_-Hl-..Ljt*lJ,'L.l-ut-1-..l-1-..t--t--l*LL*l--l--t--l*-l-.L.Hl*-l*-f,--L
F
Year No of
Student
S
Category First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Fail
2072 J/ Gen aa.).) 1 aJ
77 OBC 7 2 2
1,2 SC B 2 2
15 ST 77 2 2
25 ALL
India
73 -.-) 6 J
100
Institute Academic Perforrnance result
l-.Ij1-1-l-H
Year No of
Student
S
Category First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Fail
2010 3/ Cen 32 4 1
11 OBC 9 2
12 SC B 2 2
15 ST 13 1 1
25 ALL
India
19 ,-)aJ
100
Year No of
Student
S
Category First
Division
Second
Division
Third
Division
Faii
I
2017 a-7J/ Gen 30 2 2 J
11 OBC 9 I 1
12 SC n 2 1 2
r-AAC./br Qnality and Excellence in Higher Educcttion 13
J
i't..2j/,*/\
,; x*gm; in*ririf'€ nt
s I ;' ,. ., ,,.0 sa+*rgl {nl 'P tT$eShftrs
t*-LTJIJutjl_
-'
L.I_l-l-l--IJt--l*L.r*L*L.L.r*L*L.HL.L_tL.LLLF;
Manual far Self * Ap'praisa! af Teacher Education Insfjfuti,:ns
Sarnpler Questionnaires far Feedback from StudentsAffiti at e d / C ttttstitu ent C a l\e g e s
Questionnaire No. 1Coilege XYZ
Programme:
Deparhnent: Semester/'f erm/Year:
Students are requiretl to rate the courses cxr the following attributes using the 4 -point scale
shown. The format given is for one course. Do the same for other courses on separate page'
0.02.00 1.50
Very Good
Course-I
Parameters
Dcpth of the course content
including proiect work if anY
Extent of t overage of course
Appiicabilitv/relevance to real life
situations
Learning value (nt terrns of
knontledge, concepts, manual
skills, analYtical abilities and
broaclening PersPectives)
5" Ciar'it1' and relevance of textual
reading material
6" Relevance of aclelitional source
material (I-ibrarY)
7. Extent of effort requirecl bYi
stuelents
8. f)verall ratin
A B
CoodVerv Good
4.00
4"00
C
Satisfactor
DUnsatisf act
2
--)
Questionnaire No.2
College XYZ 5rytr;16ir'm1
Wi g*YP li'ai "*sti{uts f}i
\ ',. i,i' i'rtr" Qtrolit.,',,,,,1B-d*mmr-V,'-tl FSIP'lffi;ii i it)
Satisfactory UnsatisfactorY
l*-LIJt_uL.t:ul-Ul-ul-l-*t-.t*.l__L.L*l*1*L*l*-uUl--t--r-.f--r*-LL.Lt{
Department :
Please rate the teacher ort
Very Good
Name of the Teacher:
Parameters
Manua!forSelf_Appraisa!afTeacherEducaiianlnstttutlans
Student Feedback on Teachers
Semester/Telm1\'ear :
the follou'ing attributes using the 4 -point scaie short'n
1.50 0.0
2.
.).
4.
5.
Knowleclge base of the teacher (as
perceirreJ by you) (Historical places of
I ndia)
Communication Skills (in terms of
articulation ancl comprehensibility)
Sincerity / Commitrnent of the teacher
Interest generated bY the teacher
Ability to integrate course material with
envirorunentfother issues, to provide a
broader PersPective
6. Ability to integrate content with other
COLITSCS
7. Accessibility of the teacher in and out of
the class (includes availability of the
teacher to motivate iurther siucly and
discussion outside class)
8^ Ability to design quizzes /Tests
/ assignments / examinations ancl
prolects to ev aluate students
utrderstanding of the course
g. Provision oi sufficient fime for feedback
10. Overall ratin
FH#$n $*tv"r l+**I*temt*e of *
fm#s ktlu';dtrori $€lsru tM'P t
lli
SatisfactorY Unsatisfactory
\ \,1'1.'/bl attaIit.t' cmcl Lrce ilancc in Higher [tcli;''itriott
L*l*-l-.LIJl-L',:'L.l-1-r-.l-l-.l-....l_L*L*L*L*L*l*L*TJul*-l*l*-l-_l--t--LLLH
Deparimeut :
Teacher :
Your resPonses
recorded.
Manua! for Se/f * Appraisal of Tez;,";tter Educatian /nsfifufions
Questionnaire No.3
{li:ilege XYZ
Studenis' overall Er,:aluation of ihe piilgranlille and Teaching
(To be filled onlr' after the course results are declarecl) j
, ,'j ,,'" -.
-i:'
.j::J .;:.:, :::al Course : :- 'l:"" '' ':;j--"
t'.,,':., .1 ; ! -,", Year : *:: j; .i.''1i ; - 't ' t... 1' P"a'- '
r.,r,ill be seen only after your course results have been finalised and
The information will be used only for the improvement of the course and teaching in
future.
You need not disclose Your
You may tick more than
contradict each other.
1" The syllabus of each course was
a) adequate e,'c) chaiienging
Background for benefiting from
a) nlore than adequaie :
c) inadequate
name if you do not wish to.
one answer to a question to the extent that they do not
b)
d)
inadequate
duli
2. the course was
b) adequate
d) cannot saY
3. Was the course easy or difficult to understand?
a) easy i..'"r'i'
c) difficult
c) inadeqtlaiet 6. -l'o t'r'hat extent rt'ere
a) Easillr
b) manageable
d) very clifficult
b) 70 to 85;'/"
ci) less than 55%
library matelial and facilities for the course?
b) adeqr"rate
d) ver\r poor
vou able to get n-raterial for the prescribed reacliirgs?
Lt n'itir some difficr'r16'
4,Howtnuchofthesyllabrrswascover.etlintheclass?a) 85 to 100o'o
c) 55 to 70%
5. lVl-rat is your oPiniou about the
a ) nlorc th.l n a (l t'(l u 'l te
d) u,ith great rlifficult't'
'r,\ "!
li;r i)uulitt' tind E.rt'el/cnct iit [[iyhei i]Liti''nlit;tic) not availtrble at all
ll:
Ll-b1*I'l-..uL.l-ul-1-.-L-l--l='-l*-l--LL.l_t--L.*IJrjur-l*l--uul.-rJu+{
11. How helpfui was the tea-9$.er in advising?
Very helpful L/3
not at all helpful
13" Internal assessmenlyes
a) Always fair i--o- b)
c) Usually unfair d)
14. What effect do 1'ou thirrk the intelnal
a) Helps to imProrze ,, b)
c) no special effect d)
e teacher's approach can best
AIwal'5 cottt'teous
always indifferent
i
\' j*'!"''/*'ftfr#
ffiiis,i" *ts*Irritnt.(€ i'rl"-\ i I
&rt; ':;'.rcatiur gsn/6 (M'P )
Manual far Self -' Appraisat of Teacher Educatian lr;stitutians
7. Hor.r, well ciid lhe teqgher prrtpare for tlre classes?
a) thoroughly b) satisfactorilY
c) poorlv d) indifferentlY
B. How weil was the teacher abJe to communicate?
a) Always effective -roo b) sometimes effective
c) Just satisfactorily d) generally ineffective
g" How far the teacher enspurages student participation in class?"tf,a) mostly yes \Es" b) sometimes
c) not at all d) alwaYs
10. If yes, which of the following methods laere used?
a) Encouraged to raise questions 3$) get involved in discussion in class
c) encourage discussion outside class d) did not encourage
a)
c)
12. Th
a)
c)
b) sometimes helpful
d) clid rtr:t advise
be describecl as
b) sornetimes rude
rl) cannot say
sometimes unfair
sonretimes fair
assessment will have on
cliscouragingsometimes effective
youl coulse gracle?
ii;r Qtttrlin' ortcl Erc'e llanca in Highr:r L'tltit'rtti';;'
1--
Fl-t--uI-t*I-l-l-^r-l-.,f-..t=-tl*-HL*EHLhLrF
Manual far Self * Appraisal of Teae her Educatian institutians
15. Holv often did the leachei prof ide feedback cn your perforr:-lance?
a) Regularly/in time b) u'ith helpful comment
c) often/ iate d) n'ithout an'v'comments
16. Were your assignments {iscussed with you?
a) Yes, fully L,i"-. b) Yes, PartlY
c) not discussed at all d) sometimes discussed
17. Were you provided with a course contributory lecture too at the beginning?
a) Yes '... "''" b) no
If yes, was it helpful?
a) Yes b) no
18. If you have other comments to offer on the course and suggestions for the teacher you
may clo so in the sPace given telow or on a separate sheet'
,{':,Y't .l'' ! '.)-- -
ffispls*r ;orsabIF:Yffifl'rt
lkchers ililu{"ilc'n b'
\,r\'\( /iv )uuiir1, ttnd Excellence itt i{igher Erlr'rcttii'tit
ffiffi& %ffi€e ffi&$ *ffisg*$'#'g*. #$ F'F;#*ffi#ffi-s &:ffi,W#ffiffi*#S.t-r;":l'i.,1 '.'.1 .. :, "'Tf. ;j:,:. r:r :1';l 5'ir.:;t 1:i i'i.F:.
ti,tnniuij'for Selt' apiraiial gf Teether Educitic;t i. siiiutio/itlAffrliated ta Si;tatuiia,\ \i';$h 11* ridyaiaya. Bhap;,;1
li*p. *i:Fe* Fisti. i*t"r*;:xi'li,**r'i **a* F;:*,1**:4. *ist $*h+r* itr'P':4***r:X
] : {*?5S?! ;43*gS ':??g*:
t-*L'.Ldt-l*i.L-L*-t*,"L-l'-ul-t-.lj1.-t-*.l-."l-L.hl_-l-_rJl=_-ubtLLuHuI-
--;'',.rr 1-:er.q
,rJi\Ji1 I
, uESDhi'
';1,/=il'riSlAY
TirLrSDAr
.t.ii,rAY
P rayerVandana
SSS institute of Teacher's Eciucation
EEdTIME - TABLE
1o.oo lo.aol 11'to-:nnat0 to to toi0.40 't1 ?_9 :120-0- .12 !9
i
rlllll! -
----
1) ^q 1'25 2'05 2.45 to
::':'.. to t0 : .:,i.'-LU r'4r 2-05 z.4s:_ _.
- 'r-
I
Mr I lv _vr!
Dat* "
LIBRAKY
Princ ipal
tr vlt i rv
ll_lll- -ll --l- |
, r_UrucH
lll IV -]-ll -,illilt lvri
I : :.) _i.r \,' I lll rvlll_ i rl I IV lvll
Tapei-i,ir.Vii-ap:i-iil& ;viainsPap*r-v &'v'i i iiiSans.)i.;1.;",.ii& i
"i!li,:iai 3.. & 5+ 3c.iVii E.:iEiisir
-g;,. slitlic-'
usnaDniral ShtndePreetr Saxena
ilrshikesh Yadavi..leelam Knare
Neelam Khare
Manjsha Bhargava
&ffi# ffiffiw& sffiF #ffiffiKffiyffi€K #F€.ffiffiffiffiffi.ffi #ffiffiffiey*ffiffi*.gJ:r*v*d by l**?F, ,$*v" **lhi & ii.r,;i. i:f ;*,t:.
iAff i r i ared & {.?,{r4fr{t {fl'€ :klr& ;#ig, E{, {: f,i r e r E d u c a t i o n t n s r i t u t i o n s
*E*. *iiF:** Fi**i. *h*Bai" in**r* ffioas, l-*cnen-ia, [ii*r. l*nri* t.4.pi4s6**1
i' : i*75$3! 3?3fi4S :p:d*2t;l-:,1-1-.t-1-lju-lj1-*.L-L-l*l-1-l--t*l-.1*Hr*t-f--Lt*-uLuH
*ate
Sri Satl,a.Sai Institr-rte of Teacher Education
Acaclemic Calendar :
] qor<n
- ,., -.-1----lqqE{ - -EEa
' , ; -loffi e mq sffi .rF srA-_i o) iqqqrJsn
i1
f} rq 3rir-daiiqtlER
3lrf{f, jt1'ei.er
-l{sq{lrjri -6* ;ffi
.r, ,'@F,'lill $*. , :i . ' "r it'rirj{i*x '"'t
€e***rg i 's].o -j*f't* l i&" :'' I
ffiffi& ffi&€we ffieg &ffiffiKffi€w$Yffi ffiw Yffiffiffiffiffi-# trffiffiffi&€*ffiffiFr* pr*v *d *nH fiii iti. #fg,$f t' feFi,'X! r?t# f;eo' n e r € d u c a ti o n i n s ri t u t i a n s
{Affil iated to Ba rkatullah Vishsrav idyalaya, Bh*pa i}
**p'. *i: f ed Pla*t, Sh*pal " i*d*re ft*sd, F**han:e' *;st $c**r* {fo{'F.}4SS*€1
l. : i075G?i ??3s+6, ;??4$;
t*=l-dLI'J**t;TJLst-1--'l-tjHHhLl--L.l--1*L.HHhr,uL.t-uH
Dat*.
l). lJeciaration bY the Head of the Institution
i i.';i.ifi thai lhal the clata
,,i ifi'\ i(i rlrr'r'le,.i ge.
lir,,, -,'iii. i: Lrii.'ir,il'etl bl, lirr
ii,'.'i I . lil l\()fil a('(1
inclucletl in this Self--'\ppraisal Repolt (SAI{; ate lrLtt' lo thc bcsi
institntitrtl a ftet' intenral rliscussiotrs, alltl \tr parrt thercof has
valiti.r te tht,, itririlniatiou pro.",itlt't1 ilr :i ris !,.\f( ti ltiin g
i;,*:e5dsrs*ii*,.ffifruu
f*td:FEF* F ii'-rr -'Jorr sr
. .;,i:--*
Signature'of the Headwith seal:
uf the insiiiulii'rr
={h*'n-fiiL -zzfu:'sz;*v.'
---zG>vr=-Cc?&*frEq,*fr.trs grdq.6dT ztd 2010-r r tg slztrg riE€- razaz q,€ fi{r{r.F i
a-,-61(q-,
?l$q sltarqo flieil sfiq{, d rrf, o-d{i.F --Qd-s}-?=---- traitn -a8:8-€gra orfi arqar d 3{T€rr{ qr uti ittra qftq-d of z.n€ trkft o.i am R. 14.06.1 0
deil e-rffiqE of Aere R 2 e.0 6. 1 0 fr ft{A a'* ffisr€Err :uqd q.'fr=rsq fr?i?"rfr-d fr"u-g. qTd{6ar d Err rirql r o 0 6e sn-en$ eEE{dr,fudrdl Eaa erd * er.,J
u-qia of 'ilrfr B r
c-rd,-
1 srrqol 3rrrd ?tdgai trRd? tg srTrrfr ?r5I 2011-12 fr ftil* F.qff-d qio d zlr"J fAsiFdart{d trr sndea o-rar *an I
?-. 3nq?b] fiedfa{r"tq qftft-q+r 2j ad 28 o1 c{ieJT 3iEq-r}ar effii6 s,6,i 6r st{d 6-14I
A-rn, ffi sTrq fdea-fr-drdq z} qrql o-z ee-i ? r
3. 3rrq6l an"ft B-firq o1 fi.rafi'-d A@1 t znrzigd fu-a,fr ftesfA-flr-fq d qfbBRr sqfi?ra dFaizo-3-e-€:lQ*a-o 3rqaqc5 oq * rqn o-r* rln I
4. s',Erd,&reffit1 .bt BgfrET tnrlo siE-ze d d-€;d sa.$.fl€ 4rd d 3€rTrr erfr aH r
5. ziaiicaroq en-r 3{Fi-arEr tnro artd trfl:ifu ?} u-srfid 6-rqT oi rzga o-ear r}onr
==fr-.i-,;.- ?=l rr"l cT ?Tc=r:D r-irt rElrr rr. n6'::= ir.t r
i 3u}fi ad Wf a eH ilr ziqgdT Blff o1 ul rrqH
goo-ario /V7 ,zra,r<*,rzi"icrorr t o a,i.na, fqer.E l{-P tc
-
t, l' it,/Q
q-I.n-dSc.ci i
':iaii t o
l?iQat;r ': l83y .., " ,
!., ti.
L*Ih-
ts--
-h-
t
aTlh-l
hn
hrf
b
-:h*r
ta:*r
rr*r
:*r
ftr
l{r
at:*
r*i.t
r-
\
I*Lt-l\it-LIt:bih
Ii-t-rjlvL_tl--,LLl*l_t*t_t--.l*.t*LL..tr-L-L-L-H
.l
:'"lit'r::t tillqU; I L . l'_l 14,t.r. t\,i -. .
r .iiii-i {r4ril c,l qcr. ta'u-q-, grjn )
qrytrri g:]q iriqfii
el lt-l< G0!,Sfn.'1F.,i a)l iil{.1iil
iji:q il i::1 ecnii;:iliE e
-1 t- \ir E;bY Ef
,E u
"e.,;r...j*r,* r"';'.
r./-T'I'i\L i r-
x
't
Becognition Order
(lr. 5l;itli,,rrY iiudr
V/e:!e rn
TO RE FUitl,t5ilEl} Iti TtlE GAZ}]TI'E
Iro.\YRC/5-6/106th/200 At \'A O 372
oF'ltrllIA * tsAIr i'-iil, sflcl'lo;\-jl
',.,:; ;fir{. \rIl "1-l f'r-i', '+;:i ii{'1 - l'u2 0l'l | ':
;r:r : 2ill.?372, 2Oi'lll 'i'21, 2'rtl:17!i 2'rL-:r-r l
llr:te; 28/i'i8/0iJ
S : r ; .. I lil i'. i l i I I :', !l I r'-r p :: I'4 ;i'l i-''
l,tl:,!-il3t'jlrll i'.., l. -lrl.. "'' i"(:' ii
\ni, )rr Nla..-{ [ \,'1.'._i.qiip i..r.-,,,\'
*HEREA'intermsofSectionia(t)oftheNcrE,Aot,lggisRlSATYAsAltNsrITurEoF
'EA'HER EDucAiioi, nux^s: L!; r'a.is'xav *-ou-arloi{ soclErv' BII'PAI'-
INDORE ROAD, O;iliJi' FED PL;Nf TAiiIAMA S'HOd-MADIIYA PRA,,ESII' hAS
subnritted an application (coae. N".- Ap*' 36591223613) to the $,/estern Regional comn.iirlee ot
NCTE for grant of reeognitionlp^ennissi""'r*-.""aucting B'E;' (co'ED) "ott"t
u'ith art i*inrtai
;";-k;of 100 students on2-03-2007 '
7,AND\\rHE,REASonscrutiny/perusaiofthe."p-p]::.i""submittedbytheinstitution.tiredocuments attached ,#ii",rln , the afrrdavit and the inpur receir'"J non, tfie visiting tearn rn the lornr oi
report and videographv:.:":ot*:11Y: ;i;;' State GoYetl*;; in" co**ittee js satisficc thai the
institutior,rsociety tutfills the requiremeilts under the er"r'iri";t ;f NCTE Act' Rules aud rele'an'.
Res*laiions iu.ruai"g'tt"-*orrn, *d s;;d"rJ, ro. the sECteacher ecrucation programme sr'tch as
in#uctiorral t-acilitiei infrastructural,facilities, library, a"co,nmoJation, financial resotttces' labcratory'
etc" for nrnning the programme and h", ,;i;;iJ^rp"i",.o dw q";iti"cl teachi"g stafl as per Nt'TE
r10Ims.
3,No\\r'THEREFORE,,itiexercisecfthepowersvestedunderSection]"1!:)(a)oftlrcl'.C1LAct, i,gg:,t15",-rr,*ri",r't n"gir,nai Cclnmiitte hetlb,,, gr?-nts recognitic:i i pe'1iis-1.on ic SRI 'c\-'i-\'A
sAt INSTIT'T' oF rna.cnnn rnt,cl,iroro,"nux_ni'1;AA t''ats'r"*Lv ]itlui'A''loh
socrETy, nnopa'uNDoRE RoJ;' oit* g*- ril puxr PACHAI1A slYioill;-
N{Ar}ti.*A rnaon,s'. for conclucting;,L}i. (co.lDrl::urs* or sEc of 1 r'ear ciuratic:r *'itir .r'
annual inrake of 100(sEC) under "r"J-"
"liirr or NCrii n*"iu"n r'itrms & proceciure ')
Regulatiotr 2001'
c,. r.rrs instiiutioi; srrari,.*ithi'one montrr oi.rhe receil:t of recogrition oTd.er" con'efitl-re eril''r\\'ill3i-ri
fund anrl reiierve 1.und account into alo-ini "...,,,rt to be op"t^*iorong rvith' an officet of tli': \\'e-cte;-rt
il clr'.,'ral Ctrnrtrt it'tce'
s. -fhe institution sharl conrpry lvith.tlie, varic'-i:i o..he' no''s anci standarcl-* presc.ibcd in tir: l'lt iil
requlations, as arrrended from time to tlnle'
6. Thc instituiio. shan make arlmission or,1\,after it obtains afilliation fio'r the exai'inirirr rri-j''' i;;
tcrins of c,rause E(12) of the'i.,lCTE G;;;g;;;it'' Xo'n.t' d: Frocedure) Regulatior''s' 20C7'
L l-iit ir,'-tti'.utiolt shall ensr'tre tiiai tir': reqirircii tlittlii''er of ar'ilder'ic siafi {br coniir"irri' i'i- " :
i:.1r'. ;i','s ii' ilosition'
ii. i:Lr:'11'rr:r. sr'rbje':i to lhi pl(ivlsl.oll
...,ii'.,..,.,irs as nlav br picscribt'i b-t
,; . "-, ,- {lclerlirtetll eic. aPl-lii'atb1c'
.i'