selective oxidation of cyclohexane over gold nanoparticles supported on mesoporous silica prepared...

Download Selective oxidation of cyclohexane over gold nanoparticles supported on mesoporous silica prepared in the presence of thioether functionality

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: x-s

Post on 06-Aug-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 285

    Cite this: Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294

    Selective oxidation of cyclohexane over gold nanoparticles supported onmesoporous silica prepared in the presence of thioether functionalityw

    Pingping Wu,ab Zhigang Xiong,a Kian Ping Lohbc and X. S. Zhao*ab

    Received 25th October 2010, Accepted 21st January 2011

    DOI: 10.1039/c0cy00025f

    Gold (Au) nanoparticles (NPs) supported on mesoporous silica were prepared using a one-pot

    synthesis method in the presence of thioether functionality -(CH2)3-S-S-S-S-(CH2)3.

    Bis(triethoxysilyl) propane tetrasulde was used as the source of thioether functionality. The

    complexation of thioether groups with tetrachloroauric anion (AuCl4) led to a good dispersion

    of Au NPs on mesoporous silica. Removal of the template and the thioether functional groups by

    calcination resulted in the reduction of the Au species, leaving behind Au NPs well dispersed on

    mesoporous silica. Selective oxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen was used to evaluate

    the catalytic properties of the Au NP catalysts prepared using the present method and compared

    with that of a Au catalyst prepared using the hydrogen reduction method.

    Introduction

    Cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone (K/A oil) are important

    intermediates for the bulk production of polyamides and

    plastics. The main route to producing K/A oil is the selective

    oxidation of cyclohexane catalyzed by a homogeneous

    catalyst, such as transition metal salts. Such homogeneous

    catalysts are undesirable in these environmentally conscious

    and energy-intensive days. Solid catalysts, such as titanium

    silicalite-1 (TS-1),1,2 metal-substituted aluminophosphate

    molecular sieves,36 metal-incorporated mesoporous and

    microporous aluminosilicate molecular sieves,710 and nano

    structured catalysts (Fe2O3, Co3O4 and mixed FeCo oxide

    nanoparticles)1113 have been explored as heterogeneous

    catalysts for cyclohexane oxidation. These catalysts in general

    exhibit a relatively low activity and/or poor selectivity.

    Very recently, gold (Au) nanoparticles (NPs) supported on

    mesoporous silica have been found to display a high catalytic

    activity in oxidation reactions.1417 As Au NPs are unstable and

    liable to aggregation, ligands such as chloro-group,18 amine,19

    phenyl20 and thioether groups14 have been found to be eective

    for stabilizing Au NPs. Bis(triethoxysilyl) propane tetrasulde

    (TESPTS) with thioether functionality -(CH2)3-S-S-S-S-(CH2)3-

    has been shown to be the most eective stabilizing ligand.14

    In this work, Au NPs supported on mesoporous silica were

    prepared using a one-pot synthesis method in the presence of

    thioether functionality. The interaction of the Au species with

    TESPTS was studied and the evolution of the Au species

    was monitored using a real-time ultravioletvisible (UVvis)

    technique. The Au NP catalysts exhibited an outstanding

    catalytic performance. It was observed that the presence of

    TESPTS in the one-pot synthesis method played an important

    role in the dispersion of Au NPs on the silica support.

    Results and discussion

    Catalyst preparation and characterization

    Fig. 1 shows the X-ray diraction (XRD) patterns of the Au

    catalysts prepared with dierent amounts of TESPTS. Three

    reection peaks indexed as (1 0 0), (1 1 0) and (2 0 0)

    diractions (Fig. 1a and b) can be seen on the SBA-15 silica

    Fig. 1 Low-angle XRD patterns of (a) SBA-15, (b) Au/0.625TESPTS

    SiO2-cal, (c) Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal, (d) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, and

    (e) Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal.

    aDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive, 117576,Singapore. E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +65 6779-1936;Tel: +65 6516-4727

    bNanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiative,National University of Singapore, 117576, Singapore

    cDepartment of Chemistry, National University of Singapore,3 Science Drive, 117543, Singapore. E-mail: [email protected];Fax: +65 6779-1691; Tel: +65 6516-4402w Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI:10.1039/c0cy00025f

    CatalysisScience & Technology

    Dynamic Article Links

    www.rsc.org/catalysis PAPER

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue

  • 286 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011

    (template) and catalyst Au/0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal, indicating

    a highly ordered 2D hexagonal structure of both materials.

    With increasing x, the (1 1 0) and (2 0 0) diraction peaks

    became less intense (Fig. 1c) and eventually disappeared

    (Fig. 1d and e). Only one diraction peak can be observed from

    catalysts Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal and Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal.

    In addition, the intensity of the peak was lowered, revealing a

    decrease in the regularity of the 2D hexagonal ordered structure.

    This was probably due to the presence of TESPTS, which

    aected the structure of the surfactant micelles, leading to the

    formation of a poor hexagonal structure. The right shift of the

    main (1 0 0) diraction peak with increasing x indicated

    increased framework shrinkage after removal of the template.

    The pore diameters (DBJH) shown in Table 1, estimated

    from the adsorption branches using the BJH method, showed

    that the pore diameters decreased with increasing x, as well as

    the wall thickness. This trend can be rationalized in terms of

    dierent interactions between the surfactant molecules and the

    silicate and/or organosilicate precursors in the hydrothermal

    system.21,22 A strong hydrophobic interaction between the

    thioether group (-CH2-CH2-CH2-S-S-S-S-CH2-CH2-CH2-)

    and the hydrophobic PPO blocks of P123 induced the

    penetration of silicate species into the micelle core, leading to

    the reduction of channel diameters. Thus, the amount of

    TESPT introduced in the synthesis mixture played a crucial

    role in determining the mesostructure of the resultant catalysts.

    The wide-angle XRD patterns of the Au catalysts prepared

    with dierent TESPTS/TEOS ratios are shown in Fig. 2 and

    the Au particle sizes calculated from the Scherrer equation are

    presented in Table 2. Four peaks at 38.181, 44.431, 64.551 and77.651 are the characteristic peaks of the (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0)and (3 1 1) reections of cubic Au nanoparticles (JCPDS card

    no.: 4-784). The Au nanoparticle size calculated from the

    XRD data showed an optimized TEMPTS/TEOS ratio of

    about 1/40 f(x = 2.5), for which well dispersed Au NPs with

    an average Au particle size of about 5.5 nm were obtained.

    When the TESPTS/TEOS ratio was less than 1/40, the size of

    Au particles increased with the decrease of TESPTS, as shown

    in the cases of catalysts Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal and Au/

    0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal, which exhibited average Au particle

    sizes of 6.6 nm and 24.4 nm, respectively.

    The Au contents in dierent catalysts were measured by

    using the inductive-coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS)

    technique and the results are shown in Table 1. It is seen that

    when the amount of TESPTS was equal to or larger than

    1.25%, almost all (^94%) Au precursors were introduced into

    the mesoporous silica to form Au NPs, indicating a very high

    Au loading eciency. However, if less than 1.25% of TESPTS

    was added, only B75% of Au precursors was immobilized inthe silica.

    The TEM images and Au NPs size distribution histograms

    of catalysts Au/xTESPTSSiO2-cal are shown in Fig. 3. When

    the amount of TESPTS was equal to 0.625%, unevenly

    distributed Au NPs (with sizes in the range of 415 nm) were

    obtained on the mesoporous silica support (Fig. 3a), consistent

    with XRD results. With the increase of the TESPTS ratio,

    uniformly dispersed Au NPs in the range of 38 nm were

    observed on catalysts Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal (Fig. 3b) and

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal (Fig. 3c) with a TESPTS ratio of

    1.25% and 2.5%, respectively. However, Au NPs began to

    aggregate and were unevenly distributed (Au NPs with sizes in

    the range of 412 nm) with a further increase of the TESPTS

    ratio (Fig. 3d) due to the deterioration of the mesoporous

    structure.

    The incorporation of thioether groups into the silica frame-

    work of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 was veried by the29Si and 13C CP MAS NMR spectra as shown in Fig. 4. From

    the 29Si MAS NMR spectra, the signals in the range of 90 to150 ppm can be assigned to the silicon resonances of Si(OSi)4(Q4, d = 110 ppm), (OH)Si(OSi)3 (Q3, d = 102 ppm) and(OH)2Si(OSi)2 (Q2, d = 91.7 ppm), and the signals in therange of 50 to 70 ppm can be assigned to the siliconresonances of Tx [(SiO)x(OH)3xSiC] sites.

    23 The resonances

    at about 65 ppm and 56 ppm attributed to the resonancesof T3 and T2 for the organosiloxanes were observed on sample

    Table 1 Textural properties of the Au catalysts prepared in this work together with SBA-15 silica

    Catalysts Au loadinga/wt% d100/nm a0b/nm SBET/m

    2 g1 Vtotal/cm3 g1 DBJH/nm Wall thickness/nm

    SBA-15 8.7 10.0 782 1.0 7.9 2.1Au/0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal 0.75 9.5 11.0 960 1.09 9.2 1.8Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal 0.94 8.8 10.2 1050 1.17 8.4 1.8Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal 1.07 8.3 9.6 945 0.89 7.7 1.9Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal 1.10 8.1 9.4 919 0.78 5.6 3.8Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 0.76 9.1 10.5 665 0.75 7.4 3.1

    a Measured using the ICP-MS technique. b a0 is the lattice parameter calculated from the d100 spacing according to the equation of a0 2d100=

    3p

    .

    SBET, surface area calculated by the BET method. Vtotal, total pore volume calculated at P/Po = 0.998. DBJH, pore diameter calculated from the

    adsorption branch using BJH method. Wall thickness obtained by subtracting pore size from lattice parameter.

    Fig. 2 Wide-angle XRD patterns of (a) Au/0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal,

    (b) Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal, (c) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal and (d)

    Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 287

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as and catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2.

    The predominant T3 resonance over T2 resonance indicates

    the existence of cross-linked organosiloxanes in sample

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as and catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2.

    Moreover, the enhancement of T3 resonance on catalyst

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 was due to further dehydration of

    organosiloxane [(SiO)2(OH)SiC] (T2) sites to [(SiO)3SiC] (T3)

    sites during the H2 reduction at 250 1C. However, on catalyst

    Table 2 Cyclohexane oxidation results on dierent catalysts

    Catalysts Au NPs sizea/nm Time/h C6H12 conversion/mol%

    Selectivity/mol%

    TOFc/h1C6H12OH C6H12O By-productsb

    SBA-15 Au/0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal 24.4 0.5 10.3 40.3 56.7 3.0 9900

    1 19.4 30.7 59.5 9.82 27.8 17.7 50.4 31.8

    Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal 6.6 0.5 13.4 37.3 60.5 2.2 103941 24.2 34.4 60.0 5.62 31.4 20.0 57.3 22.7

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal 5.5 0.5 15.9 35.7 62.6 1.7 116531 31.7 24.0 69.5 6.52 33.4 18.5 56.6 24.8

    Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal 6.4 0.5 13.6 35.8 61.7 2.5 98861 27.3 31.0 62.7 6.32 34.5 18.8 61.6 19.6

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 0.5 0 01 3.3 60.6 38.0 1.42 11.2 55.4 41.0 3.6

    C6H12, cyclohexane. C6H12OH, cyclohexanol. C6H12O, cyclohexanone.a Au particle sizes were estimated from the XRD patterns using the

    Scherrer equation, t = 0.9l/Bcos(y), where t is the crystallite size, l is the wavelength, B is the full width at the half maximum, and y is thediraction angle. b By-products are mainly ring-opened acids such as n-butyric, n-valeric, succinic, glutaric and adipic acid. c Moles of K/A oil

    produced per mole of Au per hour.

    Fig. 3 TEM images and Au NPs size distribution histograms of catalysts (a) Au/0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal, (b) Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal,

    (c) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal and (d) Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • 288 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, no T3 or T2 peak was observed

    because of the complete removal of functional groups. The

    presence of the peaks in the range of 1040 ppm on the 13C CP

    MAS NMR spectra further conrmed the presence of

    organosiloxane in sample Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as and catalyst

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. Three dierent carbon chemical

    environments with chemical shifts of d = 10 ppm, 21 ppm,and 40 ppm in the 13C CP MAS NMR spectrum can be

    assigned to C1, C2 and C3 of the thioether group (Si-1CH2-2

    CH2-3CH2-S-S-S-S-

    3CH2-2CH2-

    1CH2-Si), respectively.23 A

    featureless 13C CP MAS NMR spectrum observed on catalyst

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal veried the complete removal of

    functional groups.

    The TEM image in Fig. 5 clearly shows the well dispersed

    Au NPs on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. The diameters

    of the Au particles were estimated to be in the range of 26 nm.

    But the Au NP sizes were in the range of 37 nm for catalyst

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal (see Fig. 3c). The larger Au NPs of

    catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-calmay be due to the aggregation

    of Au particles during the calcination (500 1C for 6 h). The Auloadings on catalysts Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 and Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal were 0.76 wt% and 1.07 wt% (shown

    in Table 1), respectively, with an expected Au loading of

    1.0 wt%. The lower Au loading eciency on catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 (76%) may be due to the leaching of Au

    species during the template removal.

    Fig. 6 shows the UV-vis spectra of pure SBA-15 (Fig. 6a),

    catalysts Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 (Fig. 6b) and Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal (Fig. 6c). A featureless spectrum was

    observed for the pure SBA-15 sample, while a strong Au

    surface plasma resonance (SPR) peak at about 513 nm can

    be seen on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, which is a typical

    SPR absorbance of nano-sized Au particles (510 nm).24 However,

    a signicant shift of the SPR peak occurred for catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2, which exhibited an absorption peak at

    ca. 423 nm. This blue shift is probably due to the interactions

    between thioether groups and Au NPs.25 The dierent colours

    of the catalysts (Fig. 6, inset) justied the dierent complexation

    forms of Au NPs on catalysts Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 and

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, conrming the existence of strong

    interactions between Au NPs and thioether groups in the

    H2-reduced catalyst.

    The one-pot synthesis chemistry

    Fig. 7 shows the real-time UV-vis spectra of the synthesis

    mixtures in the absence and presence of TESPTS. The pure

    HAuCl4 solution (Fig. 7, curve 0) with a yellow colour

    exhibited two absorption bands centred at B220 nm andB310 nm, which originated from the gold(III) chloride andpartially hydrolyzed gold chloride (Au(OH)xCl4x

    ) species,respectively.26 After adding the AuCl4

    solution into thesynthesis mixture, the UV-vis spectra of the solution are

    shown in Fig. 7a and b. Without introducing the functional

    precursor TESPTS, the absorption peak shifted slightly to a

    longer wavelength (B325 nm) which is due to the hinderingeect of the strong acidic condition (pHo 1) on the hydrolysis

    Fig. 4 29Si and 13C MAS NMR spectra of catalysts (a) Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-as, (b) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 and (c) Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-cal.

    Fig. 5 TEM image and Au NPs size distribution histogram of

    catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2.

    Fig. 6 UV-visible spectra of (a) SBA-15, (b) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2and (c) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 289

    of AuCl4 to (Au(OH)xCl4x

    ). The concentration of AuCl4

    in the solution exhibited a slight decrease after 1 h reaction,

    which may be due to the adsorption of AuCl4 on silicate

    species. On the other hand, with the presence of TESPTS, the

    two absorption spectra shifted to shorter wavelengths and

    developed new adsorption bands at about 210 nm and 280 nm.

    The intensity of these two peaks gradually enhanced, indicating

    that a certain form of complex gradually formed between

    AuCl4 and functionality TESPTS.27

    The evolution of this complex under the hydrothermal

    treatment conditions was studied by comparing the UV-vis

    spectra of the synthesis mixture with sample Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-as (Fig. 8a and b). Similar spectra were

    observed in the range of 200300 nm due to the absorption

    band of the thioetherAuCl4 complex; while an enhanced

    UV-vis spectrum was seen on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as

    in the range of 400500 nm, indicating that Au NPs with a size

    of less than 2 nm (Au clusters) may be formed during the

    hydrothermal treatment.28

    The XPS results shown in Fig. 9a and d supported the above

    conclusion. As seen from Fig. 9a, sample Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-as exhibited the Au 4f7/2 and 4f5/2 doublet with binding

    energies of 84.5 eV and 88.2 eV, respectively, similar to those

    of thiolate-passivated Au clusters (Au:SR clusters) at

    84.4 eV,29 indicating the presence of thioether-stabilized Au

    clusters in the as-synthesized sample. The S 2p spectrum for

    sample Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as showed doublet peaks with

    binding energies of 163.9 eV and 165.1 eV (Fig. 9d), conrming

    the existence of interaction between S and Au.30 Herein, it can

    be concluded that the Au clusters began to form during the

    hydrothermal process and Au species were partially present as

    thioether-stabilized Au clusters in sample Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-as. After H2 reduction or high temperature calcination,

    the UV-vis spectra showed the formation of thioether-stabilized

    Au NPs on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 (Fig. 6b) and the

    formation of Au NPs on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal

    (Fig. 6c). The XPS results shown in Fig. 9 veried this

    conclusion. Au 4f7/2 with binding energies of 84.0 eV and

    84.1 eV were observed on catalysts Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2(Fig. 9b) and Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal (Fig. 9c), respectively,

    due to metallic Au0 (84.0 eV),31 indicating that the Au species

    were completely reduced after H2 reduction or high tempera-

    ture calcination. The S 2p spectrum shown in Fig. 9e con-

    rmed the presence of interaction between S and Au NPs on

    catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. The obvious decrease of

    spectrum intensity may be due to the partial decomposition

    of thioether groups during the H2 reduction. The S 2p peaks

    are absent on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal (Fig. 9f). The

    evolution of Au species is also veried by the colour of the

    sample. The as-synthesized sample showed a light yellow

    colour, indicating the presence of AuCl4 while the ruby

    colour of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal indicated the

    presence of Au NPs (insets in Fig. 6 and 8).

    Based on the above results, a possible formation mechanism

    of Au NP catalysts was proposed as illustrated in Scheme 1.

    Upon mixing of the silica precursors, TEOS and TESPTS,

    Fig. 7 Evolution of UV-visible spectra by introducing HAuCl4 into

    the synthesis gel with and without TESPTS addition.

    Fig. 8 UV-visible spectra of (a) synthesis gel after 60 min reaction

    and (b) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as.

    Fig. 9 Au (4f) (a, b, c) and S (2p) (d, e, f) XPS spectra of catalysts

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as, Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 and Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-cal.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • 290 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011

    with the gold precursor (HAuCl4) and the surfactant solution,

    a mesoporous silica phase was formed. At the same time,

    complexation of AuCl4 with thioether groups occurred to

    form AuCl4thioether complexes (Step I). With the

    co-condensation of the silica precursors to form the silica

    framework under the hydrothermal treatment (100 1C), partof AuCl4

    thioether complexes decomposed to form Auclusters stabilized by thioether groups (Step II) as proved by

    the UV-vis and XPS data of sample Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as.

    The template was removed by ethanol extraction or high

    temperature calcination. The extracted sample was reduced

    by H2 (Step III). The residual AuCl4thioether complexes

    were completely reduced and thioether-stabilized Au clusters

    assembled to form thioether-stabilized Au NPs as proved by

    the UV-vis spectrum of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2.

    On the other hand, after high-temperature calcination (Step III0),the template and functional groups were completely removed

    and AuCl4thioether complexes and thioether-stabilized Au

    clusters decomposed and further deposited to form Au NPs.

    The removal of the functional groups (e.g., -CH2-CH2-CH2-S-

    S-S-S-CH2-CH2-CH2-) led to the formation of structure

    defects in the silica framework, which were the favourable

    sites for the formation of Au NPs, and the silica framework

    prohibited the growth of Au NPs during the high temperature

    treatment.14

    Catalytic performance

    The catalytic performance of the catalysts prepared with

    dierent TESPTS/TEOS ratios or reduced by dierent methods

    was investigated on selective oxidation of cyclohexane with

    molecular oxygen. The catalytic reaction prole with time was

    studied on catalyst Au/xTESPTSSiO2-cal and the H2-reduced

    catalyst. The conversion, selectivity, turnover frequency

    (TOF) and product distribution are summarized in Table 2.

    It can be seen that the calcined catalysts showed a good

    catalytic activity (the cyclohexane conversion ranged from

    19.4% to 31.7%) and K/A oil selectivity (>90%) in the rst

    hour reaction. After that, the selectivity of K/A oil declined

    with a slight increase in the cyclohexane conversion

    (27.834.5%). The results indicated that control over the

    reaction kinetics is important in terms of avoiding further

    oxidation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone and further

    oxidation of K/A oil to by-products. During the reaction,

    the formation of by-products is inevitable with the increase of

    reaction time. The TOF was measured in moles of product

    K/A oil produced per mole of Au per hour. The remarkably

    highest TOF number (11 653 h1) for the rst half an hourreaction was observed on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal,

    indicating the highest initial reaction rate of cyclohexane

    oxidation on this catalyst, followed by catalysts Au/

    1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal (10 394 h1), Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal

    (9886 h1) and Au/0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal (9900 h1). This

    trend was closely related to the Au NP sizes of the catalysts.

    Catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal exhibited the smallest and

    most uniform Au particles (with an average Au NPs size of

    about 5.5 nm), followed by catalysts Au/1.25TESPTSSiO2-cal

    (with an average Au NPs size of 6.6 nm), Au/5TESPTSSiO2-cal

    (with an average Au NPs size of 6.4 nm) and Au/

    0.625TESPTSSiO2-cal (with an average Au NPs size of

    24.4 nm). The higher reaction activity on catalyst with smaller

    Scheme 1 Evolution of Au species during the one-pot synthesis process: (I) mixing of all reaction precursors in one pot; (II) hydrothermal

    treatment at 100 1C for 24 h; (III) ethanol extraction followed by H2 reduction, and (III0) high-temperature calcination.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 291

    Au NPs size can be explained below. More surface-free Au

    atoms were presented as the active sites on the catalysts with

    smaller AuNPs. Judging from the characterization and reaction

    results, the optimized TESPTS/TEOS ratio was obtained as

    1/40 (at the value of x = 2.5) with which well-dispersed Au

    NPs were obtained and a high Au loading eciency was

    achieved, thus leading to a high catalytic activity.

    Table 2 also shows that catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal

    exhibited a much higher cyclohexane conversion than catalyst

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. The lower activity of the latter,

    on the other hand, minimized the deep oxidation of K/A oil

    to by-products, thus leading to a high K/A oil selectivity. The

    catalytic data collected in this study showed that catalyst

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 with Au particle sizes in the range of

    26 nm exhibited a lower catalytic activity than the calcined

    catalyst with Au particle sizes in the range of 37 nm. The

    lower cyclohexane conversion on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-H2 (0.76 wt%) is probably due to the lower Au loading

    than that on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal (1.07 wt%).

    But the extremely lower TOF of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-H2 (0 h1) than that of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-cal during the rst half an hour reaction indicated a

    lower initial reaction rate of the former. This is most probably

    due to the partial coordination of active Au sites with capping

    agent TESPTS, which hampered the accessibility of the active

    Au sites to the reactants.32

    Based on above reaction results, catalyst Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-cal synthesized with a TESPTS/TEOS ratio of 1/40 and

    reduced by calcination exhibited the best catalytic activity for

    cyclohexane oxidation. Furthermore, the optimized reaction

    time for this catalyst was 1 h with respect to achieving a high

    cyclohexane conversion and K/A oil selectivity. The results

    obtained in present work are more signicant than the previous

    reported results shown in Table S1 (see ESIw).15,18,3335

    Compared to these materials, the present catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal emerged as the most promising catalyst

    for cyclohexane oxidation with respect to both high cyclohexane

    conversion (B32%) and high TOF (11633 h1). The highreaction rate and cyclohexane conversion on catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal is because of more surface-free Au atoms

    acting as active sites after complete removal of functional

    groups. Correlating the above reaction results with the catalyst

    properties, it was realized that the available surface-free Au

    atoms determined the catalytic activity of Au nanoparticles

    supported on functionalized mesoporous silica, while the

    presence of functional groups on the resultant catalyst may

    poison the catalytic activity.

    Catalyst stability and recyclability

    Recycling tests with repeated use of catalysts Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-cal and Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 in six consecutive reactions

    were carried out. The catalyst was removed from the reaction

    system by ltration after 1 h reaction and washed thoroughly

    with ethanol, followed by drying at 80 1C overnight and thensubjected to the next cycle. The recycling results shown in

    Fig. 10 indicated that a slight decrease in conversion occurred

    after the 2nd run on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal and no

    obvious activity loss was observed in the following 4 cycles,

    demonstrating a good stability of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-cal. The slight decrease of catalytic activity during the

    rst two cycles is due to the aggregation of small Au NPs on

    the surface of the silica support.

    Fig. 11 shows the recyclability of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTS

    SiO2-H2. It is interesting to note that the catalytic activity kept

    increasing in the rst several runs and decreased after the 4th

    run. This is due to the fact that part of the Au surface was

    coordinated by the functional ligand in the fresh catalyst. The

    functional groups would be decomposed under the high

    temperature reaction. Thus, after one or two runs the active

    sites were completely released from coordination, leading to

    the higher activity in the 3rd and 4th cycles. However, these

    free Au NPs may easily aggregate to larger Au particles;

    Fig. 10 Recyclability of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal. (a) Fresh

    catalyst, (b) catalyst after two reaction cycles and (c) catalyst after six

    reaction cycles.

    Fig. 11 Recyclability of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. (a) Fresh

    catalyst, (b) catalyst after one reaction cycle, (c) catalyst after two

    reaction cycles and (d) catalyst after six reaction cycles.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • 292 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011

    explaining that after the 4th reaction cycle, the catalytic

    activity decreased again. The colours of the fresh and used

    catalysts shown in Fig. 10 and 11 justied the above results.

    For catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, the appearance of catalyst

    became slightly dark red after two reaction cycles and no

    obvious change of colour occurred after the 2nd reaction cycle

    until the 6th cycle, indicating that no further aggregation

    occurred after the initial aggregation of surface Au NPs. On

    the other hand, the colour changed signicantly in each cycle

    of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2, indicating the decomposition

    of functional groups, the release of Au NPs and the further

    aggregation of Au NPs.

    Fig. 12 shows the S 2p XPS spectra of catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 before and after use. It is seen that the

    thioether groups with a binding energy of 163.8 eV were

    oxidized to form SO3 with a binding energy of 168.8 eV after

    the 1st reaction cycle, and then decomposed after the 3rd

    reaction cycle. This exactly explains that the catalyst preserved

    the highest catalytic activity in the 4th reaction cycle and after

    that aggregation of Au nanoparticles occurred. As is seen from

    the TEM images in Fig. 13, no obvious aggregation of Au NPs

    was observed on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, while

    distinct aggregation of Au NPs was found on catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. The excellent stability and recyclability

    of catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal is due to the connement

    of Au NPs in the silica framework, while the poor stability of

    catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 is attributed to the attachment

    of Au NPs with functional groups, which were unstable at high

    temperatures. These reaction results conrmed the validity of the

    formation mechanism proposed in Scheme 1 that for catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 the AuNPs were attached and stabilized by

    thioether groups, while on catalyst Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal, the

    Au NPs were protected by the silica framework.

    Experimental

    Chemicals

    HAuCl4xH2O (Aldrich), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 98%,Acros Organics), triblock co-polymer PEO20PPO70PEO20

    (P123, Aldrich),bis(triethoxysilyl) propane tetrasulde

    (TESPTS, 97%, Aldrich), hydrochloric acid (37%, Merck),

    cyclohexane (99.99%, Fisher) and absolute ethanol (99.98%,

    Merck) were used as received without further purication.

    Catalyst preparation

    In a typical synthesis, 4 g of P123 was dissolved in 30 mL of

    deionized water at room temperature followed by adding 120 mL

    of a 0.74 M HCl solution into this solution. A mixture of

    TEOS and TESPTS was slowly added. Then, 6.4 mL of 0.02 M

    HAuCl4xH2O solution was added. After stirring at 40 1C for24 h, the mixture was transferred to a Teon-lined stainless

    steel autoclave to undergo a static hydrothermal treatment at

    100 1C for 24 h. The solid products were ltered o, washedwith deionized water till no Cl was detected using a AgNO3solution, and dried at 80 1C in a vacuum oven overnight. Toinvestigate the eect of TESPTS on the loading of Au, the

    molar percentage of TESPTS/TEOS = x% was varied by

    changing x from 0.625 to 5. The samples thus obtained, herein

    denoted as Au/xTESPTSSiO2-as, were calcined in air at 500 1Cfor 6 h to remove the template. During the calcination process,

    Au species were reduced to Au nanoparticles. The nal solid

    products are designated as Au/xTESPTSSiO2-cal, which

    were used directly as catalysts without further reduction.

    For comparison purpose, sample Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-as

    was treated with ethanol to remove the template, followed by

    hydrogen reduction at 250 1C for 2 h. This catalyst is designatedas Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2.

    Fig. 12 S 2p XPS spectra of fresh and used catalyst Au/

    2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2. (a) Fresh catalyst, (b) after one reaction cycle,

    (c) after two reaction cycles and (d) after three reaction cycles.

    Fig. 13 TEM images of catalysts (a) Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-cal and (b)

    Au/2.5TESPTSSiO2-H2 after 6 cycles of reaction.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 293

    Catalyst characterization

    X-Ray powder diraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a

    XRD-6000 (Shimadzu, Japan) system with a Cu-Ka radiationof wavelength l = 0.15418 nm. N2 adsorptiondesorptionisotherms were measured at 196 1C on an automaticvolumetric sorption analyzer (Micromeritics, ASAP2020).

    Prior to adsorption, the samples were degassed at 200 1C for4 h under vacuum. The solid ultravioletvisible (UV-vis)

    spectra were measured on a UV-vis-NIR (UV-visible Near

    Infra-Red) scanning spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV-3101 PC)

    with an ISR-3100 integrating sphere attachment and BaSO4 as

    an internal reference. Chemical analyses of Au in the catalysts

    were carried out on an Agilent 7500 series inductive-coupled

    plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS), after dissolving the

    solids by attacking with a 2 : 1 mixture of HNO3/HF.

    X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were recorded

    on an AXIS HIS 165 spectrometer (Kratos Analytical) with a

    monochromatized Al-Ka X-ray source. The Au 4f signals wererecorded in a 0.05 eV step with a pass energy of 40 eV. Solid-

    state magic-angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance

    (NMR) spectra were obtained on a Bruker DRX400 FT-

    NMR spectrometer. A 4 mm rotor was used. The MAS speed

    was 8 kHz. The cross-polarization (CP) technique was used for13C measurements while the single-pulse method was used for29Si spectrum collections. The microstructures of the catalysts

    were observed on a transmission electron microscope (JEM

    2010 from JEOL) operated at 200 kV.

    Measurement of catalytic properties

    The selective oxidation of cyclohexane was carried out in a

    200 mL Parr batch reactor with a polytetrauoroethylene

    (PTFE) liner. In a typical oxidation reaction, 20 mL of

    cyclohexane and 50 mg solid catalyst were added into the

    reactor and the reaction was conducted under the conditions

    of 150 1C and a pressure of 1 MPa controlled by O2. After thereaction, the mixture was dissolved by ethanol and an excessive

    amount of triphenylphosphine (Ph3P) was added to the reaction

    mixture to completely reduce the cyclohexyl hydroperoxide

    (CHHP), an intermediate in the cyclohexane oxidation to

    cyclohexanol. The products were analyzed using a gas chromato-

    gram (HP 7890 series GC) with a mass spectrometer detector

    (HP 5973 mass selective detector) and a capillary column

    (HP 5MS).

    Conclusions

    Gold nanoparticles supported on mesoporous silica have been

    prepared using a simple one-pot synthesis method in the

    presence of bis(triethoxysilyl) propane tetrasulde (TESPTS)

    as a ligand. The amount of TESPTS present in the synthesis

    system was found to play a crucial role in the dispersion of

    the nal gold nanoparticles because of the complexation eect

    of thioether groups with AuCl4 species. Calcination of the

    as-synthesized solids for removing the template and the organic

    ligand directly yielded ruby-colored gold catalysts. Removal of

    the template by using alcohol extraction followed by hydrogen

    reduction yielded a light-brown-colored gold catalyst. The

    catalyst prepared by direct calcination exhibited a higher

    catalytic activity in selective oxidation of cyclohexane with

    molecular oxygen than the catalyst prepared using the hydrogen

    reduction method because of the smaller gold nanoparticle size

    of the former catalyst and partial coverage of the gold particle

    surface by organic functional groups in the latter catalyst. The

    gold catalyst prepared using the one-pot synthesis method also

    displayed an excellent stability and recyclability.

    Acknowledgements

    P. W. wishes to thank National University of Singapore

    Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NUSNNI) for oering a

    scholarship.

    References

    1 E. V. Spinace, H. O. Pastore and U. Schuchardt, J. Catal., 1995,157, 631635.

    2 M. H. Zahedi-Niaki, M. P. Kapoor and S. Kaliaguine, J. Catal.,1998, 177, 231239.

    3 S. S. Lin and H. S. Weng, Appl. Catal., A, 1993, 105, 289308.4 R. Zhao, Y. Q. Wang, Y. L. Guo, Y. Guo, X. H. Liu, Z. G. Zhang,Y. S. Wang, W. C. Zhan and G. Z. Lu, Green Chem., 2006, 8,459466.

    5 B. Moden, B. Z. Zhan, J. Dakka, J. G. Santiesteban and E. Iglesia,J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 14021411.

    6 J. Li, X. Li, Y. Shi, D. S. Mao and G. Z. Lu, Catal. Lett., 2010,137, 180189.

    7 S. E. Dapurkar, A. Sakthivel and P. Selvam, New J. Chem., 2003,27, 11841190.

    8 S. Samanta, N. K. Mal and A. Bhaumik, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,2005, 236, 711.

    9 H. Zhao, J. C. Zhou, H. Luo, C. Y. Zeng, D. H. Li and Y. J. Liu,Catal. Lett., 2006, 108, 4954.

    10 J. Li, Y. Shi, L. Xu and G. Z. Lu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2010, 49,53925399.

    11 N. Perkas, Y. Koltypin, O. Palchik, A. Gedanken andS. Chandrasekaran, Appl. Catal., A, 2001, 209, 125130.

    12 V. Kesavan, D. Dhar, Y. Koltypin, N. Perkas, O. Palchik,A. Gedanken and S. Chandrasekaran, in 11th European Conferenceon Analytical Chemistry (EUROANALYSIS 11), Lisbon, Portugal,Int Union Pure Applied Chemistry, 2000, pp. 8591.

    13 J. M. Thomas, B. F. G. Johnson, R. Raja, G. Sankar andP. A. Midgley, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 2030.

    14 L. F. Chen, J. C. Hu and R. Richards, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,131, 914915.

    15 R. Zhao, D. Ji, G. M. Lv, G. Qian, L. Yan, X. L. Wang andJ. S. Suo, Chem. Commun., 2004, 904905.

    16 G. M. Lu, D. Ji, G. Qian, Y. X. Qi, X. L. Wang and J. S. Suo,Appl. Catal., A, 2005, 280, 175180.

    17 B. P. C. Hereijgers and B. M. Weckhuysen, J. Catal., 2010, 270,1625.

    18 K. K. Zhu, J. C. Hu and R. Richards, Catal. Lett., 2005, 100,195199.

    19 H. G. Zhu, B. Lee, S. Dai and S. H. Overbury, Langmuir, 2003, 19,39743980.

    20 T. Maddanimath, A. Kumar, J. DArcy-Gall, P. G. Ganesan,K. Vijayamohanan and G. Ramanath, Chem. Commun., 2005,14351437.

    21 J. C. Hu, L. F. Chen, K. K. Zhu, A. Suchopar and R. Richards, inGold 2006 Meeting, Limerick, Ireland, Elsevier Science Bv, 2006,pp. 277283.

    22 H. Liu, J. Yang, Q. H. Yang, G. Wang and Y. Li, Adv. Funct.Mater., 2005, 15, 12971302.

    23 J. Liu, Q. H. Yang, L. Zhang, D. M. Jiang, X. Shi, J. Yang,H. Zhong and C. Li, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 569576.

    24 S. Link and M. A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103,42124217.

    25 Y. Negishi and T. Tsukuda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,40464047.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online

  • 294 Catal. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 285294 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011

    26 F. Moreau, G. C. Bond and A. O. Taylor, J. Catal., 2005, 231,

    105114.27 K. Torigoe, A. Suzuki and K. Esumi, J. Colloid Interface Sci.,

    2001, 243, 528.28 T. Shimizu, T. Teranishi, S. Hasegawa and M. Miyake, J. Phys.

    Chem. B, 2003, 107, 27192724.29 S. R. Johnson, S. D. Evans, S. W. Mahon and A. Ulman,

    Langmuir, 1997, 13, 5157.30 D. G. Castner, K. Hinds and D. W. Grainger, Langmuir, 1996, 12,

    50835086.

    31 M. Brust, M. Walker, D. Bethell, D. J. Schirin and R. Whyman,J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 801802.

    32 V. C. L. Butselaar-Orthlieb, A. Quintanilla, C. Kwakernaak,W. G. Sloof, M. T. Kreutzer and F. Kapteijn, J. Catal., 2010,271, 104114.

    33 G. M. Lu, R. Zhao, G. Qian, Y. X. Qi, X. L. Wang and J. S. Suo,Catal. Lett., 2004, 97, 115118.

    34 L. X. Xu, C. H. He, M. Q. Zhu and S. Fang, Catal. Lett., 2007,114, 202205.

    35 L. X. Xu, C. H. He, M. Q. Zhu, K. J. Wu and Y. L. Lai, Catal.Lett., 2007, 118, 248253.

    Dow

    nloa

    ded

    on 0

    2 Ju

    ly 2

    012

    Publ

    ished

    on

    16 F

    ebru

    ary

    2011

    on

    http

    ://pu

    bs.rs

    c.org

    | doi:

    10.103

    9/C0C

    Y0002

    5FView Online